Dose escalation of an Evans blue-modified radiolabeled somatostatin analog 177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

Extended peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: evaluating nephrotoxicity and therapeutic effectiveness in neuroendocrine tumor patients receiving more than four treatment cycles

PURPOSE

Currently, the most used peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) regimen for neuroendocrine tumors comprises 4 treatment cycles, and there is not enough large-scale data to support the safety of more individualized extended PRRT. This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and potential nephrotoxicity related to PRRT using more than four treatment cycles.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we included patients who had received at least four PRRT cycles and had available follow-up data. We analyzed renal function indicators before and after multiple treatments, comparing nephrotoxicity in patients receiving four cycles ("standard") with those receiving more than four ("extended treatment"). Nephrotoxicity was assessed via creatinine levels and CTCAE creatinine grades. Treatment effectiveness was gauged using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, focusing on overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 (IBM), R 4.2.3, and GraphPad Prism 9.0.0. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value of less than 0.05.

RESULTS

Our study cohort consisted of 281 patients in the standard group and 356 in the extended treatment group. No significant differences in baseline characteristics or renal function were noted between the two groups pre-treatment. Mean post-treatment creatinine levels did not significantly differ between the standard (89.30 ± 51.19 μmol/L) and extended treatment groups (93.20 ± 55.98 μmol/L; P = 0.364). Similarly, there was no statistical significance between the CTCAE creatinine grades of the two groups (P = 0.448). Adverse renal events were observed in 0.4% of patients in the standard group and 1.1% in the extended treatment group. After a median follow-up time of 88.3 months, we found that median overall survival was significantly higher in the extended treatment group (72.8 months) compared to the standard treatment group (52.8 months). A Cox regression analysis further supported these findings, indicating a better prognosis for the extended treatment group in terms of overall survival (HR: 0.580, P < 0.001) and DSS (HR: 0.599, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that extending PRRT treatment beyond the standard four cycles may be a safe and effective therapeutic strategy for NET patients. This approach could be particularly beneficial for patients experiencing disease recurrence or progression following standard treatment.

A phase 1 trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose and patient-specific dosimetry of [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This translational study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, dosimetry, and therapeutic efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-EB-01 (denoted as [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

METHODS

A total of 13 patients with mCRPC were recruited in this study. A standard 3 + 3 dose escalation protocol was performed. The following dose levels were ultimately evaluated: 1.11, 1.85, and 2.59 GBq/cycle. Patients received [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 therapy for up to two cycles at a 6-week interval.

RESULTS

Patients received fractionated doses of [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 ranging from 1.11 to 2.59 GBq per cycle. Myelosuppression was dose-limiting at 2.59 GBq, and 1.85 GBq was determined to be the MTD. The total-body effective dose for 177Lu-LNC1003 was 0.35 ± 0.05 mSv/MBq. The salivary glands were found to receive the highest estimated radiation dose, which was calculated to be 3.61 ± 2.83 mSv/MBq. The effective doses of kidneys and red bone marrow were 1.88 ± 0.35 and 0.22 ± 0.04 mSv/MBq, respectively. The tumor mean absorbed doses for bone and lymph node metastases were 8.52 and 9.51 mSv/MBq. Following the first treatment cycle, PSA decline was observed in 1 (33.3%), 4 (66.7%), and 2 (50.0%) patients at dose levels 1 (1.11 GBq), 2 (1.85 GBq), and 3 (2.59 GBq), respectively. Compared with the baseline serum PSA value, 1 (33.3%) at dose level 1 and 4 (66.6%) patients at dose level 2, presented a PSA decline after the second treatment cycle.

CONCLUSION

This phase 1 trial revealed that the MTD of [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 is 1.85 GBq. The treatment with multiple cycles at the dose of 1.11 GBq /cycle and 1.85 GBq /cycle was well tolerated. [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 has higher tumor effective doses in bone and lymph nodes metastases while the absorbed dose in the red bone marrow should be closely monitored in future treatment studies with higher doses and multiple cycles. The frequency of administration also needs to be further explored to assess the efficacy and side effects of [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

177Lu-PSMA-EB-01 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (NCT05613738, Registered 14 November 2022). URL of registry https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT05613738.

Development of a New Class of CXCR4-Targeting Radioligands Based on the Endogenous Antagonist EPI-X4 for Oncological Applications

The peptide fragment of human serum albumin that was identified as an inhibitor of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), termed EPI-X4, was investigated as a scaffold for the development of CXCR4-targeting radio-theragnostics. Derivatives of its truncated version JM#21 (ILRWSRKLPCVS) were conjugated to 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and tested in Jurkat and Ghost-CXCR4 cells. Ligand-1, -2, -5, -6, -7, -8, and -9 were selected for radiolabeling. Molecular modeling indicated that ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA incorporation C-terminally did not interfere with the CXCR4 binding. Lipophilicity, in vitro plasma stability, and cellular uptake hinted ¹⁷⁷Lu-7 as superior. In Jurkat xenografts, all radioligands showed >90% washout from the body within an hour, with the exception of ¹⁷⁷Lu-7 and ¹⁷⁷Lu-9. ¹⁷⁷Lu-7 demonstrated best CXCR4-tumor targeting. Ex vivo biodistribution and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/positron emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging of ¹⁷⁷Lu-7/⁶⁸Ga-7 showed the same distribution profile for both radioligands, characterized by very low uptake in all nontargeted organs except the kidneys. The data support the feasibility of CXCR4-targeting with EPI-X4-based radioligands and designate ligand-7 as a lead candidate for further optimization.

Evaluation of Safety, Biodistribution, and Dosimetry of a Long-Acting Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analog 177 Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE With and Without Amino Acid Infusion

PURPOSE

Kidney is considered to be one of the dose-limiting organs in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Amino acid cocktail infusion has been applied to reduce renal absorbed dose by inhibiting the proximal tubular reabsorption of the radiopeptide. An Evans blue-modified 177 Lu-labeled octreotate ( 177 Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE) has an extended circulation in the blood, which may make the amino acid infusion unnecessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry of 177 Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE with and without amino acid infusion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors were randomly divided into 2 groups. The effect of amino acid infusion on renal uptake was assessed in a crossover randomized setting. Group A received 177 Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE at a dose of 3.7 GBq without amino acid infusion for the first cycle and with amino acid infusion for the second cycle; group B received 177 Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE at a dose of 3.7 GBq with amino acid infusion for the first cycle and without amino acid infusion for the second cycle. All patients underwent serial whole-body planar imaging at 1, 24, 96, and 168 hours and SPECT scan at 24 hours after radioligand administration. Abdominal CT was performed 2 days before PRRT for SPECT/CT fusion. The dosimetry was calculated using the HERMES software. Dosimetry evaluation was compared on a between-group and intrapatient basis.

RESULTS

Administrations of 177 Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE with or without amino acids were well tolerated. No grade 4 hematotoxicity was observed in any of the patients. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was reported in 1 patient. No nephrotoxicity of any grade was recorded. No significant difference was observed in creatinine (75.1 ± 21.7 vs 67.5 ± 18.1 μmol/L, P = 0.128), blood urea nitrogen (4.5 ± 0.8 vs 5.1 ± 1.4 mmol/L, P = 0.612), or GFR (109.3 ± 25.2 vs 100.9 ± 24.9 mL/min, P = 0.398) before and after PRRT. For each cycle, there was no significant difference in whole-body effective dose, kidney effective dose, as well as residence time of the kidneys between group A and B ( P > 0.05). By intrapatient comparison, without and with amino acid infusion also did not show significant difference in whole-body effective dose (0.14 ± 0.05 vs 0.12 ± 0.04 mSv/MBq, P = 0.612), kidney effective dose (1.09 ± 0.42 vs 0.73 ± 0.31 mSv/MBq, P = 0.093), and residence time of the kidneys (2.95 ± 1.58 vs 3.13 ± 1.11 hours, P = 0.674).

CONCLUSIONS

177 Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE PRRT with and without amino acid infusion demonstrated a favorable safety profile in neuroendocrine tumor patients. Administration of 177 Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE without amino acid infusion has acceptable slightly increased kidney absorbed dose and residence time of the kidneys, and does not affect kidney function. Further investigation in a larger cohort and long-term follow-up are warranted.

Advances in Radionuclides and Radiolabelled Peptides for Cancer Therapeutics

Radiopharmaceutical therapy, which can detect and treat tumours simultaneously, was introduced more than 80 years ago, and it has changed medical strategies with respect to cancer. Many radioactive radionuclides have been developed, and functional, molecularly modified radiolabelled peptides have been used to produce biomolecules and therapeutics that are vastly utilised in the field of radio medicine. Since the 1990s, they have smoothly transitioned into clinical application, and as of today, a wide variety of radiolabelled radionuclide derivatives have been examined and evaluated in various studies. Advanced technologies, such as conjugation of functional peptides or incorporation of radionuclides into chelating ligands, have been developed for advanced radiopharmaceutical cancer therapy. New radiolabelled conjugates for targeted radiotherapy have been designed to deliver radiation directly to cancer cells with improved specificity and minimal damage to the surrounding normal tissue. The development of new theragnostic radionuclides, which can be used for both imaging and therapy purposes, allows for more precise targeting and monitoring of the treatment response. The increased use of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is also important in the targeting of specific receptors which are overexpressed in cancer cells. In this review, we provide insights into the development of radionuclides and functional radiolabelled peptides, give a brief background, and describe their transition into clinical application.

Imaging-guided targeted radionuclide tumor therapy: From concept to clinical translation

Since the first introduction of sodium iodide I-131 for use with thyroid patients almost 80 years ago, more than 50 radiopharmaceuticals have reached the markets for a wide range of diseases, especially cancers. The nuclear medicine paradigm also shifts from solely molecular imaging or radionuclide therapy to imaging-guided radionuclide therapy, which is deemed a vital component of precision cancer therapy and an emerging medical modality for personalized medicine. The imaging-guided radionuclide therapy highlights the systematic integration of targeted nuclear diagnostics and radionuclide therapeutics. Regarding this, nuclear imaging serves to "visualize" the lesions and guide the therapeutic strategy, followed by administration of a precise patient specific dose of radiotherapeutics for treatment according to the absorbed dose to different organs and tumors calculated by dosimetry tools, and finally repeated imaging to predict the prognosis. This strategy leads to significantly enhanced therapeutic efficacy, improved patient outcomes, and manageable adverse events. In this review, we provide an overview of imaging-guided targeted radionuclide therapy for different tumors such as advanced prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumors, with a focus on development of new radioligands and their preclinical and clinical results, and further discuss about challenges and future perspectives.

China’s radiopharmaceuticals on expressway: 2014–2021

This review provides an essential overview on the progress of rapidly-developing China’s radiopharmaceuticals in recent years (2014–2021). Our discussion reflects on efforts to develop potential, preclinical, and in-clinical radiopharmaceuticals including the following areas: (1) brain imaging agents, (2) cardiovascular imaging agents, (3) infection and inflammation imaging agents, (4) tumor radiopharmaceuticals, and (5) boron delivery agents (a class of radiopharmaceutical prodrug) for neutron capture therapy. Especially, the progress in basic research, including new radiolabeling methodology, is highlighted from a standpoint of radiopharmaceutical chemistry. Meanwhile, we briefly reflect on the recent major events related to radiopharmaceuticals along with the distribution of major R&D forces (universities, institutions, facilities, and companies), clinical study status, and national regulatory supports. We conclude with a brief commentary on remaining limitations and emerging opportunities for China’s radiopharmaceuticals.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogs-A Continuously Evolving Class of Radiopharmaceuticals

Somatostatin receptors (SSTs) are recognized as favorable molecular targets in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), with subtype 2 (SST₂) being the predominantly and most frequently expressed. PET/CT imaging with ⁶⁸Ga-labeled SST agonists, e.g., ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TOC (SomaKit TOC^®) or ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE (NETSPOT^®), plays an important role in staging and restaging these tumors and can identify patients who qualify and would potentially benefit from peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with the therapeutic counterparts ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-TOC or ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-TATE (Lutathera^®). This is an important feature of SST targeting, as it allows a personalized treatment approach (theranostic approach). Today, new developments hold promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy. Among them, the use of SST₂ antagonists, such as JR11 and LM3, has shown certain advantages in improving image sensitivity and tumor radiation dose, and there is evidence that they may find application in other oncological indications beyond NETs and NENs. In addition, PRRT performed with more cytotoxic α-emitters, such as ²²⁵Ac, or β^- and Auger electrons, such as ¹⁶¹Tb, presents higher efficacy. It remains to be seen if any of these new developments will overpower the established radiolabeled SST analogs and PRRT with β^--emitters.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.

Treatment for gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several available therapies for neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) have demonstrated efficacy in randomised controlled trials. However, translation of these results into improved care faces several challenges, as a direct comparison of the most pertinent therapies is incomplete.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of therapies for NETs, to guide clinical decision-making, and to provide estimates of relative efficiency of the different treatment options (including placebo) and rank the treatments according to their efficiency based on a network meta-analysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified studies through systematic searches of the following bibliographic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (Ovid); and Embase from January 1947 to December 2020. In addition, we checked trial registries for ongoing or unpublished eligible trials and manually searched for abstracts from scientific and clinical meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We evaluated randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more therapies in people with NETs (primarily gastrointestinal and pancreatic).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data to a pre-designed data extraction form. Multi-arm studies were included in the network meta-analysis using the R-package netmeta. We separately analysed two different outcomes (disease control and progression-free survival) and two types of NET (gastrointestinal and pancreatic NET) in four network meta-analyses. A frequentist approach was used to compare the efficacy of therapies.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 55 studies in 90 records in the qualitative analysis, reporting 39 primary RCTs and 16 subgroup analyses. We included 22 RCTs, with 4299 participants, that reported disease control and/or progression-free survival in the network meta-analysis. Precision-of-treatment estimates and estimated heterogeneity were limited, although the risk of bias was predominantly low. The network meta-analysis of progression-free survival found nine therapies for pancreatic NETs: everolimus (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.46]), interferon plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.80]), everolimus plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.57]), bevacizumab plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.89]), interferon (HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.94]), sunitinib (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.67]), everolimus plus bevacizumab plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.83]), surufatinib (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.76]), and somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.77]); and six therapies for gastrointestinal NETs: 177-Lu-DOTATATE plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.26]), everolimus plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.12 [95%CI, 0.03 to 0.54]), bevacizumab plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.94]), interferon plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.93]), surufatinib (HR, 0.33 [95%CI, 0.12 to 0.88]), and somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.76]), with higher efficacy than placebo. Besides everolimus for pancreatic NETs, the results suggested an overall superiority of combination therapies, including somatostatin analogues. The results indicate that NET therapies have a broad range of risk for adverse events and effects on quality of life, but these were reported inconsistently. Evidence from this network meta-analysis (and underlying RCTs) does not support any particular therapy (or combinations of therapies) with respect to patient-centred outcomes (e.g. overall survival and quality of life).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this study suggest that a range of efficient therapies with different safety profiles is available for people with NETs.

Treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia, are we on the way to personalised medicine?

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (GEPNEN) comprises clinically as well as prognostically diverse tumour entities often diagnosed at late stage. Current classification provides a uniform terminology and a Ki67-based grading system, thereby facilitating management. Advances in the study of genomic and epigenetic landscapes have amplified knowledge of tumour biology and enhanced identification of prognostic and potentially predictive treatment subgroups. Translation of this genomic and mechanistic biology into advanced GEPNEN management is limited. 'Targeted' treatments such as somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radiotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are treatment options but predictive tools are lacking. The inability to identify clonal heterogeneity and define critical oncoregulatory pathways prior to therapy, restrict therapeutic efficacy as does the inability to monitor disease status in real time. Chemotherapy in the poor prognosis NEN G3 group, though associated with acceptable response rates, only leads to short-term tumour control and their molecular biology requires delineation to provide new and more specific treatment options.The future requires an exploration of the NEN tumour genome, its microenvironment and an identification of critical oncologic checkpoints for precise drug targeting. In the advance to personalised medical treatment of patients with GEPNEN, clinical trials need to be based on mechanistic and multidimensional characterisation of each tumour in order to identify the therapeutic agent effective for the individual tumour.This review surveys advances in NEN research and delineates the current status of translation with a view to laying the basis for a genome-based personalised medicine management of advanced GEPNEN.

Strategies Towards Improving Clinical Outcomes of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Purpose of Review

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA⁰,Tyr³] octreotate is an effective and safe second- or third-line treatment option for patients with low-grade advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). In this review, we will focus on possible extensions of the current use of PRRT and on new approaches which could further improve its treatment efficacy and safety.

Recent Findings

Promising results were published regarding PRRT in other NENs, including lung NENs or high-grade NENs, and applying PRRT as neoadjuvant or salvage therapy. Furthermore, a diversity of strategic approaches, including dosimetry, somatostatin receptor antagonists, somatostatin receptor upregulation, radiosensitization, different radionuclides, albumin binding, alternative renal protection, and liver-directed therapy in combination with PRRT, have the potential to improve the outcome of PRRT. Also, novel biomarkers are presented that could predict response to PRRT.

Summary

Multiple preclinical and early clinical studies have shown encouraging potential to advance the clinical outcome of PRRT in NEN patients. However, at this moment, most of these strategies have not yet reached the clinical setting of randomized phase III trials.

Intraindividual comparison of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TOC

Purpose

The radiolabelled somatostatin analogue [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE binds to albumin via Evans blue, thereby increasing the residence time in the blood and potentially allowing more therapeutic agent to be absorbed into the target tissue during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. It was tested in selected patients whether the substance is superior to [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TOC.

Methods

Activity kinetics in organs and tumours after [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TOC were compared intraindividually in five patients with progressive somatostatin receptor-positive disease scheduled for radionuclide therapy.

Results

In comparison to [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TOC, tumour doses per administered activity were higher for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in 4 of 5 patients (median ratio: 1.7; range: 0.9 to 3.9), kidney doses (median ratio: 3.2; range: 1.6 to 9.8) as well as spleen doses (median ratio: 4.7; range 1.2 to 6.2) in all patients, and liver doses in 3 of 4 evaluable patients (median ratio: 4.0; range: 0.7 to 4.9). The tumour to critical organs absorbed dose ratios were higher after [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TOC in 4 of 5 patients.

Conclusions

Prior to a treatment with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE, it should be assessed individually whether the compound is superior to established substances.

177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE, a Radiolabeled Analogue of Somatostatin Receptor Type 2, for the Imaging and Treatment of Thyroid Cancer

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to analyze the role of somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2) as a molecular target for the imaging and treatment of thyroid cancer through analysis of SSTR2 expression and its epigenetic modulation and testing tumor uptake of different radiolabeled SSTR2 analogues.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We analyzed SSTR2 expression by immunostaining of 92 thyroid cancer tissue samples and quantified standard uptake values (SUV_max) of SSTR2 analogue, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE, by PET/CT imaging in 25 patients with metastatic thyroid cancer. We utilized human thyroid cancer cell lines characterized by differential SSTR2 expression (TT, BCPAP, and FTC133) and rat pancreatic cell line (AR42J) with intrinsically high SSTR2 expression for functional in vitro studies. SSTR2-high (AR42J) and SSTR2-low (FTC133) xenograft mouse models were used to test the uptake of radiolabeled SSTR2 analogues and their therapeutic efficacy in vivo.

RESULTS

Thyroid cancer had a higher SSTR2 expression than normal thyroid. Hurthle cell thyroid cancer was characterized by the highest ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake [median SUV_max, 16.5 (7.9-29)] than other types of thyroid cancers. In vivo studies demonstrated that radiolabeled DOTA-EB-TATE is characterized by significantly higher tumor uptake than DOTA-TATE (P < 0.001) and DOTA-JR11 (P < 0.001). Treatment with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE extended survival and reduced tumor size in a mouse model characterized by high somatostatin (SST) analogues uptake (SUV_max, 15.16 ± 4.34), but had no effects in a model with low SST analogues uptake (SUV_max, 4.8 ± 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

A novel SST analogue, ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE, has the potential to be translated from bench to bedside for the targeted therapy of patients characterized by high uptake of SST analogues in metastatic lesions.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy of Late-Stage Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients with Multiple Cycles of 177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of multiple cycles of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-Evans blue (EB)-TATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) at escalating doses in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Methods: Thirty-two NET patients were randomly divided into 3 groups and treated with escalating doses. Group A received 1.17 ± 0.09 GBq/cycle; group B, 1.89 ± 0.53 GBq/cycle; and group C, 3.97 ± 0.84 GBq/cycle. The treatment was planned for up to 3 cycles. Treatment-related adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. Treatment response was evaluated according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria and modified PERCIST. Results: Administration of PRRT was well tolerated, without life-threatening adverse events (CTCAE grade 4). CTCAE grade 3 hematotoxicity was recorded in 1 patient (16.6%) in group B (thrombocytopenia) and 3 patients (21.4%) in group C (thrombocytopenia in 3, anemia in 1). CTCAE grade 3 hepatotoxicity (elevated aspartate aminotransferase) was recorded in 1 patient in group A (8.3%) and 1 patient in group C (7.1%). No nephrotoxicity was observed. According to the criteria of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, the overall disease response rates were similar in groups A, B, and C (50.0%, 50.0%, and 42.9%, respectively), and the overall disease control rates were higher in groups B (83.3%) and C (71.5%) than in group A (66.7%). According to modified PERCIST, a lower disease response rate but a similar disease control rate were found. When a comparable baseline SUV_max ranging from 15 to 40 was selected, the percentage change in SUV_max increased slightly in group A (2.1% ± 40.8%) but decreased significantly in groups B and C (-38.7% ± 10.0% and -14.7% ± 20.0%, respectively) after the first PRRT (P = 0.001) and decreased in all 3 groups after the third PRRT (groups A, B, and C: -6.9% ± 42.3%, -49.2% ± 30.9%, -11.9% ± 37.9%, respectively; P = 0.044). Conclusion: Dose escalations of up to 3.97 GBq/cycle seem to be well tolerated for ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE. ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE doses of 1.89 and 3.97 GBq/cycle were effective in tumor control and more effective than 1.17 GBq/cycle.