1
|
Ye Z, Kou Y, Shen J, Dang J, Tan X, Jiang X, Wang X, Lu H, Chen S, Cheng Z. A comparative study of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and pelvic MRI in newly diagnosed prostate cancer. BMC Med Imaging 2024; 24:192. [PMID: 39080625 PMCID: PMC11290235 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01376-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the difference in the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and pelvic MRI in primary prostate cancer, as well as the correlation between the two methods and histopathological parameters and serum PSA levels. METHODS A total of 41 patients with suspected prostate cancer who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT imaging in our department from 2018 to 2023 were retrospectively collected. All patients underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI scans. The sensitivity, PPV and diagnostic accuracy of MRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in the diagnosis of prostate cancer were calculated after comparing the results of MRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT with biopsy. The Spearman test was used to calculate the correlation between 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, MRI parameters, histopathological indicators, and serum PSA levels. RESULTS Compared with histopathological results, the sensitivity, PPV and diagnostic accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in the diagnosis of prostate cancer were 95.1%, 100.0% and 95.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, PPV and diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer were 82.9%, 100.0% and 82.9%, respectively. There was a mild to moderately positive correlation between Gleason (Gs) score, Ki-67 index, serum PSA level and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT parameters (p < 0.05). There was a moderately negative correlation between the expression of AMACR (P504S) and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT parameters (p < 0.05). The serum PSA level and the Gs score were moderately positively correlated with the MRI parameters (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between histopathological parameters and MRI parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Compared with MRI, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT has higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in the detection of malignant prostate tumors. In addition, the Ki-67 index and AMACR (P504S) expression were only correlated with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT parameters. Gs score and serum PSA level were correlated with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI parameters. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT examination can provide certain reference values for the clinical diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of malignant prostate tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenyan Ye
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Guang'an District People's Hospital, Guangan, China
| | - Ying Kou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiaqi Shen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Jun Dang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaofei Tan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiao Jiang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaoxiong Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Hao Lu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Shirong Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhuzhong Cheng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alberts IL, Seifert R, Werner RA, Rowe SP, Afshar-Oromieh A. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen: Diagnostics. PET Clin 2024; 19:351-362. [PMID: 38702228 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
Since its clinical introduction in May 2011, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/computed tomography has quickly gained worldwide recognition as a significant breakthrough in prostate cancer diagnostics. In the meantime, several new PSMA radioligands for PET imaging have been introduced into routine clinical practice. This article aims to introduce the most commonly used tracers and their key areas of application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian L Alberts
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer - Vancouver, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1H5, Canada
| | - Robert Seifert
- University Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Rudolf A Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Germany
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- University Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiang Z, Yang T, Xu L. Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:436-445. [PMID: 38582633 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
AIM Our main goal of this meta-analytical analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) against multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the context of identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS A thorough search covering articles published until March 2023 was carried out across major databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Studies examining the direct comparison of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in patients with PCa suffering biochemical recurrence were included in the inclusion criteria. Using the renowned Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 technique, each study's methodological rigor was assessed. RESULTS We analyzed data from six eligible studies involving 290 patients in total. The combined data showed that for PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI, respectively, the pooled overall detection rates for recurrent PCa after definitive treatment were 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.89) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.44-0.91). The detection rates for local recurrence were specifically 0.52 (95% CI: 0.39-0.65) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.31-0.89), while they were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.26-0.74) and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.18-0.48) for lymph node metastasis. Notably, there was no discernible difference between the two imaging modalities in terms of the overall detection rate (P = 0.95). The detection rates for local recurrence and lymph node metastasis did not differ statistically significantly (P = 0.55, 0.23). CONCLUSION The performance of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in identifying biochemical recurrence in PCa appears to be comparable. However, the meta-analysis' findings came from research with modest sample sizes. In this context, more extensive research should be conducted in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Jiang
- Medical School, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, 410208, China.
| | - T Yang
- Medical School, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, 410208, China
| | - L Xu
- Medical School, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, 410208, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhu M, Liang Z, Feng T, Mai Z, Jin S, Wu L, Zhou H, Chen Y, Yan W. Up-to-Date Imaging and Diagnostic Techniques for Prostate Cancer: A Literature Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2283. [PMID: 37443677 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) faces great challenges in early diagnosis, which often leads not only to unnecessary, invasive procedures, but to over-diagnosis and treatment as well, thus highlighting the need for modern PCa diagnostic techniques. The review aims to provide an up-to-date summary of chronologically existing diagnostic approaches for PCa, as well as their potential to improve clinically significant PCa (csPCa) diagnosis and to reduce the proliferation and monitoring of PCa. Our review demonstrates the primary outcomes of the most significant studies and makes comparisons across the diagnostic efficacies of different PCa tests. Since prostate biopsy, the current mainstream PCa diagnosis, is an invasive procedure with a high risk of post-biopsy complications, it is vital we dig out specific, sensitive, and accurate diagnostic approaches in PCa and conduct more studies with milestone findings and comparable sample sizes to validate and corroborate the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhen Liang
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Tianrui Feng
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhipeng Mai
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Shijie Jin
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Liyi Wu
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Huashan Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Yuliang Chen
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Weigang Yan
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang YF, Lo CY, Chen LY, Chang CW, Huang YT, Huang YY, Huang YH. Comparing the Detection Performance Between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:e321-e331. [PMID: 37145456 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has been promoted as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for prostate biopsy. However, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) including 68 Ga-PSMA-11, 18 F-DCFPyL, and 18 F-PSMA-1007 applied PET/CT imaging was an emerging diagnostic tool in prostate cancer patients for staging or posttreatment follow-up, even early detecting. Many studies have used PSMA PET for comparison with mpMRI to test the diagnostic ability for early prostate cancer. Unfortunately, these studies have shown conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences in diagnostic performance between PSMA PET and mpMRI for detecting and T staging localized prostatic tumors. METHODS This meta-analysis involved a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases. The pooling sensitivity and specificity of PSMA and mpMRI verified by pathological analysis were calculated and used to compare the differences between the 2 imaging tools. RESULTS Overall, 39 studies were included (3630 patients in total) from 2016 to 2022 in the current meta-analysis and found that the pooling sensitivity values for localized prostatic tumors and T staging T3a and T3b of PSMA PET were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.86), 0.61 (95% CI, 0.39-0.79), and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76), respectively, whereas those of mpMRI were found to be 0.84 (95% 0.78-0.89), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.80), and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.45-0.73), respectively, without significant differences ( P > 0.05). However, in a subgroup analysis of radiotracer, the pooling sensitivity of 18 F-DCFPyL PET was higher than mpMRI (relative risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis found that whereas 18 F-DCFPyL PET was superior to mpMRI at detecting localized prostatic tumors, the detection performance of PSMA PET for localized prostatic tumors and T staging was comparable to that of mpMRI.
Collapse
|
6
|
Chan TH, Haworth A, Wang A, Osanlouy M, Williams S, Mitchell C, Hofman MS, Hicks RJ, Murphy DG, Reynolds HM. Detecting localised prostate cancer using radiomic features in PSMA PET and multiparametric MRI for biologically targeted radiation therapy. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:34. [PMID: 37099047 PMCID: PMC10133419 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-00984-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) are well-established modalities for identifying intra-prostatic lesions (IPLs) in localised prostate cancer. This study aimed to investigate the use of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for biologically targeted radiation therapy treatment planning by: (1) analysing the relationship between imaging parameters at a voxel-wise level and (2) assessing the performance of radiomic-based machine learning models to predict tumour location and grade. METHODS PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI data from 19 prostate cancer patients were co-registered with whole-mount histopathology using an established registration framework. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps were computed from DWI and semi-quantitative and quantitative parameters from DCE MRI. Voxel-wise correlation analysis was conducted between mpMRI parameters and PET Standardised Uptake Value (SUV) for all tumour voxels. Classification models were built using radiomic and clinical features to predict IPLs at a voxel level and then classified further into high-grade or low-grade voxels. RESULTS Perfusion parameters from DCE MRI were more highly correlated with PET SUV than ADC or T2w. IPLs were best detected with a Random Forest Classifier using radiomic features from PET and mpMRI rather than either modality alone (sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of 0.842, 0.804 and 0.890, respectively). The tumour grading model had an overall accuracy ranging from 0.671 to 0.992. CONCLUSIONS Machine learning classifiers using radiomic features from PSMA PET and mpMRI show promise for predicting IPLs and differentiating between high-grade and low-grade disease, which could be used to inform biologically targeted radiation therapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsz Him Chan
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alan Wang
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Centre for Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Mahyar Osanlouy
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Scott Williams
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Catherine Mitchell
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hayley M Reynolds
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A Systematic Review of the Variability in Performing and Reporting Intraprostatic Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Primary Staging Studies. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 50:91-105. [PMID: 37101769 PMCID: PMC10123424 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide. Men at risk are typically offered multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and, if suspicious, a targeted biopsy. However, false-negative rates of magnetic resonance imaging are consistently 18%; therefore, there is growing interest in improving the diagnostic performance of imaging through novel technologies. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for PCa staging and, more recently, for intraprostatic tumour localisation. However, significant variability has been observed in how PSMA PET is performed and reported. Objective In this review, we aim to evaluate how pervasive this variability is in trials investigating the performance of PSMA PET in primary PCa workup. Evidence acquisition Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed an optimal search in five different databases. After removing duplicates, 65 studies were included in our review. Evidence synthesis Studies dated back as early as 2016, with numerous different source countries. There was variation in the reference standard for PSMA PET, with some using biopsy specimens or surgical specimens, and in some cases, a combination of the two. Similar inconsistencies were noted when studies selected histological definitions of clinically significant PCa, while some omitted their definition altogether. The most significant variations in performing PSMA PET were the radiotracer type, dose, acquisition time after injection, and the PET camera being utilised. Substantial variation in the reporting of PSMA PET was noted, with no consistency in defining what constitutes a positive intraprostatic lesion. Across 65 studies, four different definitions were used. Conclusions This systematic review has highlighted considerable variation in obtaining and performing a PSMA PET study in the context of primary PCa diagnosis. Given the discrepancy in how PSMA PET was performed and reported, it questions the homogony of studies from centre to centre. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for this to become a consistently useful and reproducible modality in the diagnosis of PCa. Patient summary Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for staging and localisation of prostate cancer (PCa); however, there is significant variability in performing and reporting PSMA PET. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for results to be consistently useful and reproducible for the diagnosis of PCa.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bauckneht M, Marini C, Cossu V, Campi C, Riondato M, Bruno S, Orengo AM, Vitale F, Carta S, Chiola S, Chiesa S, Miceli A, D’Amico F, Fornarini G, Terrone C, Piana M, Morbelli S, Signori A, Barboro P, Sambuceti G. Gene's expression underpinning the divergent predictive value of [18F]F-fluorodeoxyglucose and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in primary prostate cancer: a bioinformatic and experimental study. J Transl Med 2023; 21:3. [PMID: 36600265 PMCID: PMC9811737 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03846-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging with Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) and Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) represent promising biomarkers for risk-stratification of Prostate Cancer (PCa). We verified whether the expression of genes encoding for PSMA and enzymes regulating FDG cellular uptake are independent and additive prognosticators in PCa. METHODS mRNA expression of genes involved in glucose metabolism and PSMA regulation obtained from primary PCa specimens were retrieved from open-source databases and analyzed using an integrative bioinformatics approach. Machine Learning (ML) techniques were used to create predictive Progression-Free Survival (PFS) models. Cellular models of primary PCa with different aggressiveness were used to compare [18F]F-PSMA-1007 and [18F]F-FDG uptake kinetics in vitro. Confocal microscopy, immunofluorescence staining, and quantification analyses were performed to assess the intracellular and cellular membrane PSMA expression. RESULTS ML analyses identified a predictive functional network involving four glucose metabolism-related genes: ALDOB, CTH, PARP2, and SLC2A4. By contrast, FOLH1 expression (encoding for PSMA) did not provide any additive predictive value to the model. At a cellular level, the increase in proliferation rate and migratory potential by primary PCa cells was associated with enhanced FDG uptake and decreased PSMA retention (paralleled by the preferential intracellular localization). CONCLUSIONS The overexpression of a functional network involving four glucose metabolism-related genes identifies a higher risk of disease progression since the earliest phases of PCa, in agreement with the acknowledged prognostic value of FDG PET imaging. By contrast, the prognostic value of PSMA PET imaging is independent of the expression of its encoding gene FOLH1. Instead, it is influenced by the protein docking to the cell membrane, regulating its accessibility to tracer binding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bauckneht
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Cecilia Marini
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,grid.428490.30000 0004 1789 9809CNR, Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), 20054 Milan, Italy
| | - Vanessa Cossu
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Cristina Campi
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065LISCOMP Lab, Department of Mathematics (DIMA), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Mattia Riondato
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Bruno
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Experimental Medicine, Human Anatomy, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Orengo
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Vitale
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Sonia Carta
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Chiola
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Sabrina Chiesa
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Alberto Miceli
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca D’Amico
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fornarini
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Michele Piana
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065LISCOMP Lab, Department of Mathematics (DIMA), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,grid.482259.00000 0004 1774 9464CNR-SPIN Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Morbelli
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessio Signori
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Paola Barboro
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Proteomic and Mass Spectrometry Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Gianmario Sambuceti
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nguyen TT, Bhosale PR, Xu G, Pan T, Wei P, Lu Y. Comparison of PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and pelvic multiparametric MRI for lesion detection in the pelvis in patients with prostate cancer. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 12:166-179. [PMID: 36636233 PMCID: PMC9831857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To directly compare the performance of pelvic mpMRI versus recently approved and increasingly used PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in intermediate-high risk and biochemical recurrent prostate cancer patient cohort while exploring their potential differing applications in specific clinical scenarios. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and pelvic mpMRI done from September 2021 to January 2022 at a single institution. The inclusion criteria were paired exams within a 3-month interval. Exclusion criteria were intervening treatment between exams, a change in PSA by more than 50% and absolute difference more than 1 ng/mL, or concurrent history of other malignancy. Abnormal lesions on these 2 imaging exams were reviewed with the identification of concordant and discordant imaging findings. The findings were verified by pathology or other imaging techniques within minimal 5-month clinical follow-up. RESULTS A total of 57 patients with 57 paired exams were included. The rate of concordant exams was 43/57 or 75.4%. Lesion-based analyses of sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for mpMRI and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in the prostate bed were 96%, 94%, 98%, 89% and 96%, 100%, 100%, 90% respectively. For pelvic lymph node metastases, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for mpMRI and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT were 52%, 100%, 100%, 55% and 100%, 100%, 100%, 100% respectively. For bone metastases, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for mpMRI and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT were 86%, 73%, 50%, 94% and 100%, 98%, 95%, 100% respectively. Exact McNemar's test for paired data suggested that in diagnostic performance between 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and mpMRI was not statistically significant in prostate bed (p-value = 1.00), but significantly in pelvic lymph nodes (p-value < 0.0001) and bone lesions (p-value = 0.0026). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and pelvic mpMRI have a good concordance rate in the detection of primary or recurrence prostate disease and can have complementary roles in the clinical assessment of the prostate bed lesions. However, there are key differences in their performance, with the notably superior performance of PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in the detection of small metastatic nodal disease and bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trinh T Nguyen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, United States,Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, United States
| | - Priya R Bhosale
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, United States
| | - Guofan Xu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, United States
| | - Tinsu Pan
- Department of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, United States
| | - Peng Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, United States
| | - Yang Lu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang X, Son MH, Ha LN, Lan X. PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET: a better choice than multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis? AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 12:195-200. [PMID: 36636231 PMCID: PMC9831858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Owing to the high tissue contrast, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has already been the most widely applied imaging method for prostate cancer. Recently, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands for nuclear imaging are emerging as a promising modality in prostate cancer, especially since the 2 PET/CT agents (68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPy) approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, limited studies have performed the comparison of mpMRI versus recently approved 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. In this issue of AJNMMI, Lu et al. compared the performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and pelvic mpMRI in intermediate-high risk and biochemical recurrent prostate cancer patients. The results demonstrated the two modalities have a good concordance rate for patient-based analysis, and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT has a better diagnostic performance in detecting lymph node metastases and bone metastases for lesion-based analysis. The use of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT provides more diagnostic confidence to better assess prostate cancer lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhan 430022, Hubei, China,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular ImagingWuhan 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Mai Hong Son
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital 108Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Le Ngoc Ha
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital 108Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Xiaoli Lan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhan 430022, Hubei, China,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular ImagingWuhan 430022, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pei Y, Ning R, Hu W, Li P, Zhang Z, Deng Y, Hong Z, Sun Y, Guo X, Zhang Q. Carbon Ion Radiotherapy Induce Metabolic Inhibition After Functional Imaging-Guided Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:845583. [PMID: 35936669 PMCID: PMC9354483 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.845583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeAs local recurrence remains a challenge and the advantages of the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique have been validated in photon radiotherapy, we applied the SIB technique to CIRT. The aim was to investigate the metabolomic changes of the CIRT with concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in localized prostate cancer (PCa) and the unique metabolic effect of the SIB technique.Material and MethodsThis study enrolled 24 pathologically confirmed PCa patients. All patients went through CIRT with concurrent ADT. The gross target volume (GTV) boost was defined as positive lesions on both 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI images. Urine samples collected before and after CIRT were analyzed by the Q-TOF UPLC-MS/MS system. R platform and MetDNA were used for peak detection and identification. Statistical analysis and metabolic pathway analysis were performed on Metaboanalyst.ResultsThe metabolite profiles were significantly altered after CIRT. The most significantly altered metabolic pathway is PSMA participated alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism. Metabolites in this pathway showed a trend to be better suppressed in the SIB group. A total of 11 identified metabolites were significantly discriminative between two groups and all of them were better down-regulated in the SIB group. Meanwhile, among these metabolites, three metabolites in DNA damage and repair related purine metabolism were down-regulated to a greater extent in the SIB group.ConclusionMetabolic dysfunction was one of the typical characteristics of PCa. CIRT with ADT showed a powerful inhibition of PCa metabolism, especially in PSMA participated metabolic pathway. The SIB CIRT showed even better performance on down-regulation of most metabolism than uniform-dose-distribution CIRT. Meanwhile, the SIB CIRT also showed its unique superiority to inhibit purine metabolism. PSMA PET/CT guided SIB CIRT showed its potentials to further benefit PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulei Pei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy lon Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Renli Ning
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy lon Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Research and Development, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy lon Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Li
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy lon Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenshan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy lon Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong Deng
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy lon Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Research and Development, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhengshan Hong
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy lon Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun Sun
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy lon Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Research and Development, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Qing Zhang, ; Xiaomao Guo, ; Yun Sun,
| | - Xiaomao Guo
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy lon Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Research and Development, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Qing Zhang, ; Xiaomao Guo, ; Yun Sun,
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy lon Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Qing Zhang, ; Xiaomao Guo, ; Yun Sun,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marinescu IM, Spohn SKB, Kiefer S, Bronsert P, Ceci L, Holzschuh J, Sigle A, Jilg CA, Rühle A, Sprave T, Nicolay NH, Winzer R, Rehm J, Kotzerke J, Hölscher T, Grosu AL, Ruf J, Benndorf M, Zamboglou C. Intraindividual Comparison Between [18F] PSMA-1007 PET/CT and Multiparametric MRI for Radiotherapy Planning in Primary Prostate Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:880042. [PMID: 35912219 PMCID: PMC9329567 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.880042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Accurate detection and segmentation of the intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) is pivotal for radiotherapy (RT) in primary prostate cancer (PCa) since it influences focal therapy target volumes and the patients’ cT stage. The study aimed to compare the performance of multiparametric resonance imaging (mpMRI) with [18F] PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PET) for intraprostatic GTV detection as well as delineation and to evaluate their respective influence on RT concepts. Materials and Methods In total, 93 patients from two German University Hospitals with [18F] PSMA-1007-PET/CT and MRI (Freiburg) or [18F] PSMA-1007-PET/MRI (Dresden) were retrospectively enrolled. Validated contouring techniques were applied for GTV-PET and -MRI segmentation. Absolute tumor volume and cT status were determined for each imaging method. The PCa distribution from histopathological reports based on biopsy cores and surgery specimen was used as reference in terms of laterality (unilateral vs. bilateral). Results In the Freiburg cohort (n = 84), mpMRI and PET detected in median 2 (range: 1–5) and 3 (range: 1–8) GTVs, respectively (p < 0.01). The median GTV-MRI was significantly smaller than the GTV-PET, measuring 2.05 vs. 3.65 ml (p = 0.0005). PET had a statistically significant higher concordance in laterality with surgery specimen compared to mpMRI (p = 0.04) and biopsy (p < 0.01), respectively. PSMA PET led to more cT2c and cT3b stages, whereas cT3a stage was more pronounced in mpMRI. Based on the cT stage derived from mpMRI and PET information, 21 and 23 as well as 59 and 60 patients, respectively, were intermediate- and high-risk according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) v1.2022 criteria. In the Dresden cohort (n = 9), similar results were observed. Conclusion Intraprostatic GTV segmentation based on [18F] PSMA-1007 PET results in more and larger GTVs compared to mpMRI. This influences focal RT target volumes and cT stage definition, but not the NCCN risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioana M. Marinescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- *Correspondence: Ioana M. Marinescu,
| | - Simon K. B. Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Selina Kiefer
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Lara Ceci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Julius Holzschuh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - August Sigle
- Department of Urology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Cordula A. Jilg
- Department of Urology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Nils H. Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Robert Winzer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jana Rehm
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- Tumorbank Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rothberg MB, Enders JJ, Kozel Z, Gopal N, Turkbey B, Pinto PA. The role of novel imaging in prostate cancer focal therapy: treatment and follow-up. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:231-238. [PMID: 35275101 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has fundamentally changed how intraprostatic lesions are visualized, serving as a highly sensitive means for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) via image-targeted biopsy. However, limitations associated with mpMRI have led to the development of new imaging technologies with the goal of better characterizing intraprostatic disease burden to more accurately guide treatment planning and surveillance for prostate cancer focal therapy. Herein, we review several novel imaging modalities with an emphasis on clinical data reported within the past two years. RECENT FINDINGS 7T MRI, artificial intelligence applied to mpMRI, positron emission tomography combined with either computerized tomography or MRI, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and micro-ultrasound are novel imaging modalities with the potential to further improve intraprostatic lesion localization for applications in focal therapy for prostate cancer. Many of these technologies have demonstrated equivalent or favorable diagnostic accuracy compared to contemporary mpMRI for identifying csPCa and some have even shown improved capabilities to define lesion borders, to provide volumetric estimates of lesions, and to assess the adequacy of focal ablation of planned treatment zones. SUMMARY Novel imaging modalities with capabilities to better characterize intraprostatic lesions have the potential to improve accuracy in treatment planning, real-time assessment of the ablation zone, and posttreatment surveillance; however, many of these technologies require further validation to determine their clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael B Rothberg
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute
| | - Jacob J Enders
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute
| | - Zachary Kozel
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute
| | - Nikhil Gopal
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter A Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zamboglou DC, Spohn DSK, Ruf PJ, Benndorf DM, Gainey DM, Kamps DM, Jilg PC, Gratzke PC, Adebahr DS, Schmidtmayer-Zamboglou B, Mix PM, Bamberg PF, Zschaeck DS, Ghadjar PP, Baltas PD, Grosu PAL. PSMA-PET- and MRI-based focal dose escalated radiotherapy of primary prostate cancer: planned safety analysis of a non-randomized 2-armed phase II trial (ARO2020-01). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:1025-1035. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
15
|
Spohn SKB, Adebahr S, Huber M, Jenkner C, Wiehle R, Nagavci B, Schmucker C, Carl EG, Chen RC, Weber WA, Mix M, Rühle A, Sprave T, Nicolay NH, Gratzke C, Benndorf M, Wiegel T, Weis J, Baltas D, Grosu AL, Zamboglou C. Feasibility, pitfalls and results of a structured concept-development phase for a randomized controlled phase III trial on radiotherapy in primary prostate cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:337. [PMID: 35351058 PMCID: PMC8960686 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09434-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Failure rate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is > 50%, includes safety-problems, underpowered statistics, lack of efficacy, lack of funding or insufficient patient recruitment and is even more pronounced in oncology trials. We present results of a structured concept-development phase (CDP) for a phase III RCT on personalized radiotherapy (RT) in primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients implementing prostate specific membrane antigen targeting positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET). Materials and methods The 1 yr process of the CDP contained five main working packages: (i) literature search and scoping review, (ii) involvement of individual patients, patients’ representatives and patients’ self-help groups addressing the patients’ willingness to participate in the preparation process and the conduct of RCTs as well as the patient informed consent (PIC), (iii) involvement of national and international experts and expert panels (iv) a phase II pilot study investigating the safety of implementation of PSMA-PET for focal dose escalation RT and (v) in-silico RT planning studies assessing feasibility of envisaged dose regimens and effects of urethral sparing in focal dose escalation. Results (i) Systematic literature searches confirmed the high clinical relevance for more evidence on advanced RT approaches, in particular stereotactic body RT, in high-risk PCa patients. (ii) Involvement of patients, patient representatives and randomly selected males relevantly changed the PIC and initiated a patient empowerment project for training of bladder preparation. (iii) Discussion with national and international experts led to adaptions of inclusion and exclusion criteria. (iv) Fifty patients were treated in the pilot trial and in- and exclusion criteria as well as enrollment calculations were adapted accordingly. Parallel conduction of the pilot trial revealed pitfalls on practicability and broadened the horizon for translational projects. (v) In-silico planning studies confirmed feasibility of envisaged dose prescription. Despite large prostate- and boost-volumes of up to 66% of the prostate, adherence to stringent anorectal dose constraints was feasible. Urethral sparing increased the therapeutic ratio. Conclusion The dynamic framework of interdisciplinary working programs in CDPs enhances robustness of RCT protocols and may be associated with decreased failure rates. Structured recommendations are warranted to further define the process of such CDPs in radiation oncology trials. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09434-2.
Collapse
|
16
|
Vlachostergios PJ, Niaz MJ, Thomas C, Christos PJ, Osborne JR, Margolis DJA, Khani F, Bander NH, Scherr DS, Tagawa ST. Pilot study of the diagnostic utility of 89 Zr-df-IAB2M and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging and multiparametric MRI in localized prostate cancer. Prostate 2022; 82:483-492. [PMID: 34985786 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate diagnosis of localized prostate cancer (PCa) is limited by inadequacy of multiparametric (mp) MRI to fully identify and differentiate localized malignant tissue from benign pathologies. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) represents an excellent target for molecular imaging. IAB2M, an 85-kD minibody derived from a de-immunized monoclonal antibody directed at the extracellular domain of human PSMA (huJ591), and PSMA-11, a small molecule ligand have been previously tested as probes for visualization of recurrent/metastatic PCa with PET/CT. This pilot, non-randomized trial studied their diagnostic utility in patients (pts) with localized PCa. METHODS Pts planned for radical prostatectomy (RP) were enrolled and underwent mpMRI and PET/CT imaging with 89 Zr-df-IAB2M and/or 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT. Image results were read by a radiologist blinded to clinical information and pathology results, mapped and compared to corresponding histopathology findings from all lesions, both clinically significant and nonsignificant. The detection rates of all three imaging modalities were measured and correlated. RESULTS 20 pts with median age of 64.5 (46-79) years and PSA level of 7.5 (1.6-36.56) ng/ml were enrolled. 19 pts underwent RP and were imaged pre-operatively with 89 Zr-Df-IAB2M PET/CT and mpMRI. Nine of those were imaged using 68 Ga-PSMA-11 as well. Out of 48 intraprostatic lesions verified on surgical pathology, IAB2M PET/CT was able to detect 36 (75%). A similar proportion of pathologically confirmed, clinically significant lesions (22/29, 76%) was detected. IAB2M PET/CT was also able to identify 14/19 (74%) extraprostatic lesions. The performance of mpMRI was inferior, with 24/48 detectable lesions (50%) and 18/29 clinically significant intraprostatic lesions (62%). Compared to the current standard (mpMRI), IAB2M PET/CT had a sensitivity of 88%, specificity 38%, positive predictive value 58%, and accuracy 63%. In 9 pts who underwent Ga-PSMA-11 as well, the latter yielded a detection rate of 70% (14/20), which was also seen in clinically significant lesions (10/14, 71%). Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT also detected 4/6 (67%) extraprostatic lesions. CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study, the performance of 89 Zr-df-IAB2M was superior to mpMRI and similar to 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The higher detection rate of PSMA-PET supports its use as a diagnostic tool with consequent management change implications in men with localized PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis J Vlachostergios
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Muhammad J Niaz
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Charlene Thomas
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Paul J Christos
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniel J A Margolis
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Division of Body Imaging, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Francesca Khani
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Neil H Bander
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Douglas S Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Scott T Tagawa
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
PSMA PET/CT and radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a winning team. Clin Transl Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-021-00478-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
18
|
Galgano SJ, West JT, Rais-Bahrami S. Role of molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221105018. [PMID: 35755177 PMCID: PMC9218890 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221105018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging of prostate cancer continues to grow, with recent inclusion of several positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers into the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the US Food and Drug Administration approval of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiotracers. While much of the work for many of these radiotracers is focused on systemic staging and restaging in both newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer and biochemically recurrent disease patients, the potential role of molecular imaging for the detection of localized prostate cancer has not yet been fully established. The primary aim of this article will be to present the potential role for molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer and discuss potential advantages and disadvantages to utilization of both PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this clinical indication of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, JT J779, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Janelle T West
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zamboglou C, Spohn SKB, Adebahr S, Huber M, Kirste S, Sprave T, Gratzke C, Chen RC, Carl EG, Weber WA, Mix M, Benndorf M, Wiegel T, Baltas D, Jenkner C, Grosu AL. PSMA-PET/MRI-Based Focal Dose Escalation in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (HypoFocal-SBRT): Study Protocol of a Randomized, Multicentric Phase III Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225795. [PMID: 34830950 PMCID: PMC8616152 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Technical advances in radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning and delivery have substantially changed RT concepts for primary prostate cancer (PCa) by (i) enabling a reduction of treatment time, and by (ii) enabling safe delivery of high RT doses. Several studies proposed a dose-response relationship for patients with primary PCa and especially in patients with high-risk features, as dose escalation leads to improved tumor control. In parallel to the improvements in RT techniques, diagnostic imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and positron-emission tomography targeting prostate-specific-membrane antigen (PSMA-PET) evolved and enable an accurate depiction of the intraprostatic tumor mass for the first time. The HypoFocal-SBRT study combines ultra-hypofractionated RT/stereotactic body RT, with focal RT dose escalation on intraprostatic tumor sides by applying state of the art diagnostic imaging and most modern RT concepts. This novel strategy will be compared with moderate hypofractionated RT (MHRT), one option for the curative primary treatment of PCa, which has been proven by several prospective trials and is recommended and carried out worldwide. We suspect an increase in relapse-free survival (RFS), and we will assess quality of life in order to detect potential changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
- German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol 4108, Cyprus
| | - Simon K. B. Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria Huber
- Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany; (M.H.); (C.J.)
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Ronald C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA;
| | | | - Wolfgang A. Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Carolin Jenkner
- Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany; (M.H.); (C.J.)
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cao J, Chen Y, Hu M, Zhang W. 177Lu-PSMA-RLT of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: limitations and improvements. Ann Nucl Med 2021; 35:861-870. [PMID: 34176105 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01649-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The prevalence of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is increasing, and its prognosis is often poor. As a highly expressed target in mCRPC, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is very attractive for its diagnosis and treatment. When the efficacy of chemical therapy is limited, radioligand therapy (RLT)-based on Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA has received more research as an emerging treatment. To date, most published related studies have proven this method is effective and safe. However, about 1/3 of mCRPC patients have not benefited from 177Lu-PSMA-RLT. The underlying mechanism of this phenomenon remains unclear. So based on the comprehensive research in recent years, this article proposes the possible reasons, including tumor lesions, PSMA heterogeneity, differences in DNA repair defects, and accelerated repopulation. Combining with the existing experience to give suggestions to improve the treatment efficacy, benefit more mCRPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianpeng Cao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
- Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Yue Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
- Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Mei Hu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
- Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
- Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
- Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences/Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610072, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ng TSC, Gao X, Salari K, Zlatev DV, Heidari P, Kamran SC. Incorporating PSMA-Targeting Theranostics Into Personalized Prostate Cancer Treatment: a Multidisciplinary Perspective. Front Oncol 2021; 11:722277. [PMID: 34395293 PMCID: PMC8355555 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.722277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent developments in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted diagnostic imaging and therapeutics (theranostics) promise to advance the management of primary, biochemically recurrent, and metastatic prostate cancer. In order to maximize the clinical impact of PSMA-targeted theranostics, a coordinated approach between the clinical stakeholders involved in prostate cancer management is required. Here, we present a vision for multidisciplinary use of PSMA theranostics from the viewpoints of nuclear radiology, medical oncology, urology, and radiation oncology. We review the currently available and forthcoming PSMA-based imaging and therapeutics and examine current and potential impacts on prostate cancer management from early localized disease to advanced treatment-refractory disease. Finally, we highlight the clinical and research opportunities related to PSMA-targeted theranostics and describe the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in this space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas S C Ng
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Xin Gao
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Keyan Salari
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Dimitar V Zlatev
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Pedram Heidari
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sophia C Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Spohn SKB, Sachpazidis I, Wiehle R, Thomann B, Sigle A, Bronsert P, Ruf J, Benndorf M, Nicolay NH, Sprave T, Grosu AL, Baltas D, Zamboglou C. Influence of Urethra Sparing on Tumor Control Probability and Normal Tissue Complication Probability in Focal Dose Escalated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy: A Planning Study Based on Histopathology Reference. Front Oncol 2021; 11:652678. [PMID: 34055621 PMCID: PMC8160377 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Multiparametric magnetic resonance tomography (mpMRI) and prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) are used to guide focal radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation concepts. Besides improvements of treatment effectiveness, maintenance of a good quality of life is essential. Therefore, this planning study investigates whether urethral sparing in moderately hypofractionated RT with focal RT dose escalation influences tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). Patients and Methods 10 patients with primary prostate cancer (PCa), who underwent 68Ga PSMA-PET/CT and mpMRI followed by radical prostatectomy were enrolled. Intraprostatic tumour volumes (gross tumor volume, GTV) based on both imaging techniques (GTV-MRI and -PET) were contoured manually using validated contouring techniques and GTV-Union was created by summing both. For each patient three IMRT plans were generated with 60 Gy to the whole prostate and a simultaneous integrated boost up to 70 Gy to GTV-Union in 20 fractions by (Plan 1) not respecting and (Plan 2) respecting dose constraints for urethra as well as (Plan 3) respecting dose constraints for planning organ at risk volume for urethra (PRV = urethra + 2mm expansion). NTCP for urethra was calculated applying a Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model. TCP-Histo was calculated based on PCa distribution in co-registered histology (GTV-Histo). Complication free tumour control probability (P+) was calculated. Furthermore, the intrafractional movement was considered. Results Median overlap of GTV-Union and PRV-Urethra was 1.6% (IQR 0-7%). Median minimum distance of GTV-Histo to urethra was 3.6 mm (IQR 2 - 7 mm) and of GTV-Union to urethra was 1.8 mm (IQR 0.0 - 5.0 mm). The respective prescription doses and dose constraints were reached in all plans. Urethra-sparing in Plans 2 and 3 reached significantly lower NTCP-Urethra (p = 0.002) without significantly affecting TCP-GTV-Histo (p = p > 0.28), NTCP-Bladder (p > 0.85) or NTCP-Rectum (p = 0.85), resulting in better P+ (p = 0.006). Simulation of intrafractional movement yielded even higher P+ values for Plans 2 and 3 compared to Plan 1. Conclusion Urethral sparing may increase the therapeutic ratio and should be implemented in focal RT dose escalation concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ilias Sachpazidis
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Wiehle
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Thomann
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - August Sigle
- Department of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kalapara AA, Ballok ZE, Ramdave S, O'Sullivan R, Ryan A, Konety B, Grummet JP, Frydenberg M. Combined Utility of 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Prostate Biopsy Pathology. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:314-320. [PMID: 33741337 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 68Gallium-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (68Ga-PSMA-11 PET) is a valuable staging tool, but its utility in characterising primary prostate cancer remains unclear. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) is a quantification measure of highest radiotracer uptake within PET-avid lesions. OBJECTIVE To assess the utility of SUVmax in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on biopsy alone and in combination with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a retrospective analysis of 200 men who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, mpMRI, and transperineal template prostate biopsy between 2016 and 2018. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary and secondary outcomes were detection of grade group (GG) 3-5 and GG 2-5 prostate cancer, respectively. We used the Mann-Whitney U test to compare SUVmax by GG, and calculated sensitivity and specificity for csPCa detection via 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, mpMRI, and both. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of csPCa on biopsy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The median SUVmax was greater for GG 3-5 tumours (6.40, interquartile range [IQR] 4.47-11.0) than for benign and GG 1-2 tumours (3.14, IQR 2.55-3.91; p < 0.001). The median SUVmax was greater for GG 3 (5.70, IQR 3.68-8.67) than for GG 2 (3.47, IQR 2.70-4.74; p < 0.001). For GG 3-5 disease, sensitivity was 86.5%, 95.9%, and 98.6%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 88.4%, 88.5%, and 93.3% using SUVmax ≥4, a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3-5, and both, respectively. This combined model detected more GG 3-5 disease than mpMRI alone (98.6% vs 95.9%; p = 0.04). SUVmax was an independent predictor of csPCa for GG 3-5 disease only (odds ratio 1.27 per unit, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.45). Our results are limited by the retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS Greater SUVmax on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is associated with detection of GG 3-5 cancer on biopsy. The combination of PI-RADS score and SUVmax provides higher sensitivity and NPV than either alone. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT may be useful alongside mpMRI in improving risk stratification for localised disease. PATIENT SUMMARY The amount of a radioactive tracer taken up in the prostate during a type of scan called PET (positron emission tomography) can predict whether aggressive prostate cancer is likely to be found on biopsy. This may complement the more usual type of scan, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), used to detect prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arveen A Kalapara
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Urology Associates, Malvern, Australia; Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | | | - Shakher Ramdave
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Monash Medical Centre, Bentleigh East, Australia
| | | | | | - Badrinath Konety
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Urology Associates, Malvern, Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Urology Associates, Malvern, Australia; Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
The impact of the co-registration technique and analysis methodology in comparison studies between advanced imaging modalities and whole-mount-histology reference in primary prostate cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5836. [PMID: 33712662 PMCID: PMC7954803 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85028-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Comparison studies using histopathology as standard of reference enable a validation of the diagnostic performance of imaging methods. This study analysed (1) the impact of different image-histopathology co-registration pathways, (2) the impact of the applied data analysis method and (3) intraindividually compared multiparametric magnet resonance tomography (mpMRI) and prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) by using the different approaches. Ten patients with primary PCa who underwent mpMRI and [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT followed by prostatectomy were prospectively enrolled. We demonstrate that the choice of the intermediate registration step [(1) via ex-vivo CT or (2) mpMRI] does not significantly affect the performance of the registration framework. Comparison of analysis methods revealed that methods using high spatial resolutions e.g. quadrant-based slice-by-slice analysis are beneficial for a differentiated analysis of performance, compared to methods with a lower resolution (segment-based analysis with 6 or 18 segments and lesions-based analysis). Furthermore, PSMA-PET outperformed mpMRI for intraprostatic PCa detection in terms of sensitivity (median %: 83-85 vs. 60-69, p < 0.04) with similar specificity (median %: 74-93.8 vs. 100) using both registration pathways. To conclude, the choice of an intermediate registration pathway does not significantly affect registration performance, analysis methods with high spatial resolution are preferable and PSMA-PET outperformed mpMRI in terms of sensitivity in our cohort.
Collapse
|
25
|
Spohn SKB, Kramer M, Kiefer S, Bronsert P, Sigle A, Schultze-Seemann W, Jilg CA, Sprave T, Ceci L, Fassbender TF, Nicolay NH, Ruf J, Grosu AL, Zamboglou C. Comparison of Manual and Semi-Automatic [ 18F]PSMA-1007 PET Based Contouring Techniques for Intraprostatic Tumor Delineation in Patients With Primary Prostate Cancer and Validation With Histopathology as Standard of Reference. Front Oncol 2020; 10:600690. [PMID: 33365271 PMCID: PMC7750498 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.600690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate contouring of intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) is pivotal for successful delivery of focal therapies and for biopsy guidance in patients with primary prostate cancer (PCa). Contouring of GTVs, using 18-Fluor labeled tracer prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography ([18F]PSMA-1007/PET) has not been examined yet. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ten Patients with primary PCa who underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET followed by radical prostatectomy were prospectively enrolled. Coregistered histopathological gross tumor volume (GTV-Histo) was used as standard of reference. PSMA-PET images were contoured on two ways: (1) manual contouring with PET scaling SUVmin-max: 0-10 was performed by three teams with different levels of experience. Team 1 repeated contouring at a different time point, resulting in n = 4 manual contours. (2) Semi-automatic contouring approaches using SUVmax thresholds of 20-50% were performed. Interobserver agreement was assessed for manual contouring by calculating the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and for all approaches sensitivity, specificity were calculated by dividing the prostate in each CT slice into four equal quadrants under consideration of histopathology as standard of reference. RESULTS Manual contouring yielded an excellent interobserver agreement with a median DSC of 0.90 (range 0.87-0.94). Volumes derived from scaling SUVmin-max 0-10 showed no statistically significant difference from GTV-Histo and high sensitivities (median 87%, range 84-90%) and specificities (median 96%, range 96-100%). GTVs using semi-automatic segmentation applying a threshold of 20-40% of SUVmax showed no significant difference in absolute volumes to GTV-Histo, GTV-SUV50% was significantly smaller. Best performing semi-automatic contour (GTV-SUV20%) achieved high sensitivity (median 93%) and specificity (median 96%). There was no statistically significant difference to SUVmin-max 0-10. CONCLUSION Manual contouring with PET scaling SUVmin-max 0-10 and semi-automatic contouring applying a threshold of 20% of SUVmax achieved high sensitivities and very high specificities and are recommended for [18F]PSMA-1007 PET based focal therapy approaches. Providing high specificities, semi-automatic approaches applying thresholds of 30-40% of SUVmax are recommend for biopsy guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon K. B. Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria Kramer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Selina Kiefer
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - August Sigle
- Department of Urology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann
- Department of Urology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Cordula A. Jilg
- Department of Urology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lara Ceci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas F. Fassbender
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H. Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kramer M, Spohn SKB, Kiefer S, Ceci L, Sigle A, Oerther B, Schultze-Seemann W, Gratzke C, Bock M, Bamberg F, Grosu AL, Benndorf M, Zamboglou C. Isotropic Expansion of the Intraprostatic Gross Tumor Volume of Primary Prostate Cancer Patients Defined in MRI-A Correlation Study With Whole Mount Histopathological Information as Reference. Front Oncol 2020; 10:596756. [PMID: 33330088 PMCID: PMC7719800 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.596756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction An accurate delineation of the intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) is of importance for focal treatment in patients with primary prostate cancer (PCa). Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is the standard of care for lesion detection but has been shown to underestimate GTV. This study investigated how far the GTV has to be expanded in MRI in order to reach concordance with the histopathological reference and whether this strategy is practicable in clinical routine. Patients and Methods Twenty-two patients with planned prostatectomy and preceded 3 Tesla mpMRI were prospectively examined. After surgery, PCa contours delineated on histopathological slides (GTV-Histo) were superimposed on MRI using ex-vivo imaging as support for co-registration. According to the PI-RADSv2 classification, GTV was manually delineated in MRI (GTV-MRI) by two experts in consensus. For volumetric analysis, we compared GTV-MRI and GTV-Histo. Subsequently, we isotropically enlarged GTV-MRI in 1 mm increments within the prostate and also compared those with GTV-Histo regarding the absolute volumes. For evaluating the spatial accuracy, we considered the coverage ratio of GTV-Histo, the Sørensen–Dice coefficient (DSC), as well as the contact with the urethra. Results In 19 of 22 patients MRI underestimated the intraprostatic tumor volume compared to histopathological reference: median GTV-Histo (4.7 cm3, IQR: 2.5–18.8) was significantly (p<0.001) lager than median GTV-MRI (2.6 cm3, IQR: 1.2–6.9). A median expansion of 1 mm (range: 0–4 mm) adjusted the initial GTV-MRI to at least the volume of GTV-Histo (GTVexp-MRI). Original GTV-MRI and expansion with 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm covered in median 39% (IQR: 2%–78%), 62% (10%–91%), 70% (15%–95%), 80% (21–100), 87% (25%–100%) of GTV-Histo, respectively. Best DSC (median: 0.54) between GTV-Histo and GTV-MRI was achieved by median expansion of 2 mm. The urethra was covered by initial GTVs-MRI in eight patients (36%). After applying an expansion with 2 mm the urethra was covered in one more patient by GTV-MRI. Conclusion Using histopathology as reference, we demonstrated that MRI underestimates intraprostatic tumor volume. A 2 mm–expansion may improve accurate GTV-delineation while respecting the balance between histological tumor coverage and overtreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Kramer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Selina Kiefer
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lara Ceci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - August Sigle
- Department of Urology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benedict Oerther
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann
- Department of Urology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Bock
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Uncovering the invisible-prevalence, characteristics, and radiomics feature-based detection of visually undetectable intraprostatic tumor lesions in 68GaPSMA-11 PET images of patients with primary prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:1987-1997. [PMID: 33210239 PMCID: PMC8113179 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05111-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Primary prostate cancer (PCa) can be visualized on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) with high accuracy. However, intraprostatic lesions may be missed by visual PSMA-PET interpretation. In this work, we quantified and characterized the intraprostatic lesions which have been missed by visual PSMA-PET image interpretation. In addition, we investigated whether PSMA-PET-derived radiomics features (RFs) could detect these lesions. Methodology This study consists of two cohorts of primary PCa patients: a prospective training cohort (n = 20) and an external validation cohort (n = 52). All patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and histology sections were obtained after surgery. PCa lesions missed by visual PET image interpretation were counted and their International Society of Urological Pathology score (ISUP) was obtained. Finally, 154 RFs were derived from the PET images and the discriminative power to differentiate between prostates with or without visually undetectable lesions was assessed and areas under the receiver-operating curve (ROC-AUC) as well as sensitivities/specificities were calculated. Results In the training cohort, visual PET image interpretation missed 134 tumor lesions in 60% (12/20) of the patients, and of these patients, 75% had clinically significant (ISUP > 1) PCa. The median diameter of the missed lesions was 2.2 mm (range: 1–6). Standard clinical parameters like the NCCN risk group were equally distributed between patients with and without visually missed lesions (p < 0.05). Two RFs (local binary pattern (LBP) size-zone non-uniformality normalized and LBP small-area emphasis) were found to perform excellently in visually unknown PCa detection (Mann-Whitney U: p < 0.01, ROC-AUC: ≥ 0.93). In the validation cohort, PCa was missed in 50% (26/52) of the patients and 77% of these patients possessed clinically significant PCa. The sensitivities of both RFs in the validation cohort were ≥ 0.8. Conclusion Visual PSMA-PET image interpretation may miss small but clinically significant PCa in a relevant number of patients and RFs can be implemented to uncover them. This could be used for guiding personalized treatments. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-020-05111-3.
Collapse
|
28
|
Roberts MJ, Morton A, Donato P, Kyle S, Pattison DA, Thomas P, Coughlin G, Esler R, Dunglison N, Gardiner RA, Doi SA, Emmett L, Yaxley J. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT tumour intensity pre-operatively predicts adverse pathological outcomes and progression-free survival in localised prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:477-482. [PMID: 32696091 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04944-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) improves prostate cancer staging. Intraprostatic PSMA intensity may predict clinically relevant oncological outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between intraprostatic PSMA intensity and adverse pathology outcomes, including biochemical progression-free survival (PFS) after radical prostatectomy. METHODS This is a cohort study of 71 patients with MRI-guided, biopsy-proven prostate cancer and pre-operative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT prior to radical prostatectomy (RP). Intraprostatic PSMA intensity was correlated to adverse pathology outcomes (Gleason score and upgrading from biopsy, pathological stage) and PFS using multivariate statistical analysis. RESULTS 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT intensity in vivo predicted all of Gleason score on RP, upgrading from biopsy to RP histopathology, pathological stage, positive surgical margins and PFS. 74.6% (53/71) of patients were free from progression at a median follow-up of 19.5 months (0.4-48 months). Predictive accuracy was particularly enhanced by PSMA among patients with biopsy Gleason score ≤ 3 + 4 (n = 39) as the most significant predictor of PFS according to Cox-proportional hazards regression. Cox-regression adjusted survival analysis predicted a 5.48-fold increase in hazard for Gleason score ≤ 3 + 4 patients with high (SUVmax > 8) compared with low (SUVmax < 8) PSMA intensity. CONCLUSION Intraprostatic 68Ga-PSMA-11 intensity is prognostic and may be a valuable new biomarker in localised prostate cancer, especially in men with biopsy-proven Gleason 3 + 4 disease considering an initial approach of active surveillance or focal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4006, Australia.
| | - Andrew Morton
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4006, Australia
| | - Peter Donato
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4006, Australia
| | - Samuel Kyle
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4006, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David A Pattison
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4006, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Paul Thomas
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4006, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Geoff Coughlin
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rachel Esler
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Nigel Dunglison
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Robert A Gardiner
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia
- Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia
| | - Suhail A Doi
- Department of Population Medicine, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - John Yaxley
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|