1
|
Fleming MT, Hermsen R, Purysko AS, Chau A, Davis P, Chapin BF, Schuster DM. True-Positive 18F-Flotufolastat Lesions in Patients with Prostate Cancer Recurrence with Baseline-Negative Conventional Imaging: Results from the Prospective, Phase 3, Multicenter SPOTLIGHT Study. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1080-1086. [PMID: 38782456 PMCID: PMC11218719 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
18F-rhPSMA-7.3 (18F-flotufolastat) is a high-affinity prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted diagnostic radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging in patients with prostate cancer. Here, we report findings from the SPOTLIGHT study (NCT04186845), assessing the performance of 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT for identifying prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive lesions confirmed by standard of truth (SoT) in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and negative conventional imaging at baseline. Methods: Men with biochemical recurrence received 296 MBq of 18F-flotufolastat intravenously and then underwent PET/CT 50-70 min later. 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT findings were evaluated by 3 masked central readers and verified using histopathology or follow-up confirmatory imaging (CT, MRI, bone scan, or 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT) as the SoT. The present analysis evaluated all patients who had negative conventional imaging at baseline, underwent 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT, and had SoT verification by histopathology or follow-up confirmatory imaging to report detection rate (DR), which is the number of patients with at least 1 PET-positive lesion, divided by the number of evaluable patients, and verified DR (VDR), which is the proportion of patients with at least 1 true-positive lesion as verified by SoT, of all patients scanned (PET-positive and PET-negative scans). DR and VDR were calculated and stratified according to prior therapy. Majority read data (agreement between ≥2 readers) are reported. Results: In total, 171 patients with negative baseline conventional imaging and SoT by histopathology or post-PET confirmatory imaging were evaluated. By majority read, the overall 18F-flotufolastat DR among these patients was 95% (163/171; 95% CI, 91.0%-98.0%), and 110 of 171 of these patients had at least 1 true-positive lesion identified (VDR, 64%; 95% CI, 56.7%-71.5%). In the postprostatectomy group (133/171), 8.3% of patients had at least 1 true-positive lesion in the prostate bed, 28% in pelvic lymph nodes, and 35% in other sites. Among those who had received radiotherapy (36/171), 50% of patients had true-positive detections in the prostate, 8.3% in pelvic lymph nodes, and 36% in other sites. Conclusion: 18F-flotufolastat frequently identified true-positive prostate cancer lesions in patients with negative conventional imaging. 18F-flotufolastat may help to better define sites of disease recurrence and inform salvage therapy decisions than does conventional imaging, potentially leading to improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T Fleming
- Virginia Oncology Associates, US Oncology Network, Norfolk, Virginia;
| | - Rick Hermsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Andrei S Purysko
- Section of Abdominal Imaging and Nuclear Radiology Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Albert Chau
- Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Phillip Davis
- Blue Earth Diagnostics Inc., Monroe Township, New Jersey
| | - Brian F Chapin
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - David M Schuster
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Green A, Temsah P, Goldfarb L, Sanfolippo K, Knoche E, Muzaffar R, Osman MM. Evaluating appropriateness of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT relative to standard of care imaging guidelines and the impact of ADT on positivity: a prospective study in 62 Veterans Administration patients at a single institution. Nucl Med Commun 2024; 45:526-535. [PMID: 38517329 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT is considered appropriate after negative standard of care (SOC) imaging. OBJECTIVE To prospectively compare 18F-fluciclovine to SOC imaging, investigate whether it should be done when SOC imaging is (+), and evaluate its detection rate in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy. METHODS We recruited 57 prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence with 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT and SOC imaging within 30 days. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score (GS), history of radical prostatectomy (RP), radiation therapy (RT) or hormone therapy (HT) were reviewed. RESULTS The 57 patients had a median PSA of 2.6 and average GS of 7.4; 27 (47.4%) had RP, 28 (49.1%) had RT, 1 (1.75%) had HT and 1 (1.75%) observation only. 18F-fluciclovine identified disease recurrence in 45/57 patients (78.9%), including oligometastasis in 18/45 (40%). SOC imaging identified recurrent disease in 12/57 patients (21.1%) while 18F-fluciclvoine identified additional sites of disease in 11/12 (91.7%). The (+) 18F-fluciclovine studies had a median PSA 2.6 ng/ml compared to 6.0 ng/ml in the (+) SOC studies. CONCLUSION 18F-fluciclovine was superior to SOC imaging for lesion detection, identification of oligometastasis and identification of additional sites of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen Green
- Department of Radiology, Saint Louis VA Medical Center, and
| | - Peter Temsah
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University and
| | | | - Kristen Sanfolippo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis VA Medical Center, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Eric Knoche
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis VA Medical Center, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Razi Muzaffar
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University and
| | - Medhat M Osman
- Department of Radiology, Saint Louis VA Medical Center, and
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University and
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao R, Xia Z, Ke M, Lv J, Zhong H, He Y, Gu D, Liu Y, Zeng G, Zhu L, Alexoff D, Kung HF, Wang X, Sun T. Determining the optimal pharmacokinetic modelling and simplified quantification method of [ 18F]AlF-P16-093 for patients with primary prostate cancer (PPCa). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2124-2133. [PMID: 38285206 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06624-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This paper discusses the optimization of pharmacokinetic modelling and alternate simplified quantification method for [18F]AlF-P16-093, a novel tracer for in vivo imaging of prostate cancer. METHODS Dynamic PET/CT scans were conducted on eight primary prostate cancer patients, followed by a whole-body scan at 60 min post-injection. Time-activity curves (TACs) were obtained by drawing volumes of interest for primary prostatic and metastatic lesions. Optimal kinetic modelling involved evaluating three compartmental models (1T2K, 2T3K, and 2T4K) accounting for fractional blood volume (Vb). The simplified quantification method was then determined based on the correlation between the static uptake measure and total distribution volume (Vt) obtained from the optimal pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS In total, 17 intraprostatic lesions, 10 lymph nodes, and 36 osseous metastases were evaluated. Visually, the contrast of the tumor increased and showed the steepest incline within the first few minutes, whereas background activity decreased over time. Full pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that a reversible two-compartmental (2T4K) model is the preferred kinetic model for the given tracer. The kinetic parameters K1, k3, Vb, and Vt were all significantly higher in lesions when compared with normal tissue (P < 0.01). Several simplified protocols were tested for approximating comprehensive dynamic quantification in tumors, with image-based SURmean (the ratio of tumor SUVmean to blood SUVmean) within the 28-34 min window found to be sufficient for approximating the total distribution Vt values (R2 = 0.949, P < 0.01). Both Vt and SURmean correlated significantly with the total serum prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) levels (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This study introduced an optimized pharmacokinetic modelling approach and a simplified acquisition method for [18F]AlF-P16-093, a novel PSMA-targeted radioligand, highlighting the feasibility of utilizing one static PET imaging (between 30 and 60 min) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Note that the image-derived input function in this study may not reflect the true corrected plasma input function, therefore the interpretation of the associated kinetic parameter estimates should be done with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiyue Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Zeheng Xia
- Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China
| | - Miao Ke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Jie Lv
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Huizhen Zhong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Yulu He
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Di Gu
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, Guangdong, China
| | - Yongda Liu
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, Guangdong, China
| | - Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, Guangdong, China
| | - Lin Zhu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - David Alexoff
- Five Eleven Pharma Inc., 3700 Market St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Hank F Kung
- Five Eleven Pharma Inc., 3700 Market St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Xinlu Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
| | - Tao Sun
- Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sallam M, Nguyen NT, Sainsbury F, Kimizuka N, Muyldermans S, Benešová-Schäfer M. PSMA-targeted radiotheranostics in modern nuclear medicine: then, now, and what of the future? Theranostics 2024; 14:3043-3079. [PMID: 38855174 PMCID: PMC11155394 DOI: 10.7150/thno.92612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
In 1853, the perception of prostate cancer (PCa) as a rare ailment prevailed, was described by the eminent Londoner surgeon John Adams. Rapidly forward to 2018, the landscape dramatically altered. Currently, men face a one-in-nine lifetime risk of PCa, accentuated by improved diagnostic methods and an ageing population. With more than three million men in the United States alone grappling with this disease, the overall risk of succumbing to stands at one in 39. The intricate clinical and biological diversity of PCa poses serious challenges in terms of imaging, ongoing monitoring, and disease management. In the field of theranostics, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that harmoniously merge targeted imaging with treatments are integrated. A pivotal player in this arena is radiotheranostics, employing radionuclides for both imaging and therapy, with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) at the forefront. Clinical milestones have been reached, including FDA- and/or EMA-approved PSMA-targeted radiodiagnostic agents, such as [18F]DCFPyL (PYLARIFY®, Lantheus Holdings), [18F]rhPSMA-7.3 (POSLUMA®, Blue Earth Diagnostics) and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (Locametz®, Novartis/ ILLUCCIX®, Telix Pharmaceuticals), as well as PSMA-targeted radiotherapeutic agents, such as [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (Pluvicto®, Novartis). Concurrently, ligand-drug and immune therapies designed to target PSMA are being advanced through rigorous preclinical research and clinical trials. This review delves into the annals of PSMA-targeted radiotheranostics, exploring its historical evolution as a signature molecule in PCa management. We scrutinise its clinical ramifications, acknowledge its limitations, and peer into the avenues that need further exploration. In the crucible of scientific inquiry, we aim to illuminate the path toward a future where the enigma of PCa is deciphered and where its menace is met with precise and effective countermeasures. In the following sections, we discuss the intriguing terrain of PCa radiotheranostics through the lens of PSMA, with the fervent hope of advancing our understanding and enhancing clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Sallam
- Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre (QMNC), Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
- School of Environment and Science (ESC), Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
- Griffith Institute for Drug Discovery (GRIDD), Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
| | - Nam-Trung Nguyen
- Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre (QMNC), Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
| | - Frank Sainsbury
- School of Environment and Science (ESC), Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
- Griffith Institute for Drug Discovery (GRIDD), Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
| | - Nobuo Kimizuka
- Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Moto-oka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
- Center for Molecular Systems (CMS), Kyushu University, 744 Moto-oka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
- Research Center for Negative Emissions Technologies (K-NETs), Kyushu University, 744 Moto-oka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
| | - Serge Muyldermans
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology (CMIM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martina Benešová-Schäfer
- Research Group Molecular Biology of Systemic Radiotherapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen R, Ng YL, Yang X, Zhu Y, Li L, Zhao H, Huang G, Liu J. Assessing dynamic metabolic heterogeneity in prostate cancer patients via total-body [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging: quantitative analysis of [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in pathological lesions and normal organs. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:896-906. [PMID: 37889299 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06475-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to quantitatively assess [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in pathological lesions and normal organs in prostate cancer using the total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and to characterize the dynamic metabolic heterogeneity of prostate cancer. METHODS Dynamic total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans were performed on ten prostate cancer patients. Manual delineation of volume-of-interests (VOIs) was performed on multiple normal organs displaying high [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake, as well as pathological lesions. Time-to-activity curves (TACs) were generated, and the four compartment models including one-tissue compartmental model (1T1k), reversible one-tissue compartmental model (1T2k), irreversible two-tissue compartment model (2T3k) and reversible two-tissue compartmental model (2T4k) were fitted to each tissue TAC. Various rate constants, including K1 (forward transport rate from plasma to the reversible compartment), k2 (reverse transport rate from the reversible compartment to plasma), k3 (tracer binding on the PSMA-receptor and its internalization), k4 (the externalization rate of the tracer) and Ki (net influx rate), were obtained. The selection of the optimal model for describing the uptake of both lesions and normal organs was determined using the Akaike information criteria (AIC). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the cut-off values for differentiating physiological and pathological [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake. RESULTS Both 1T1k and 1T2k models showed relatively high AIC values compared to the 2T3k and 2T4k models in both pathological lesions and normal organs. The kinetic behavior of pathological lesions was better described by the 2T3k model compared to the 2T4k model, while the normal organs were better described by the 2T4k model. Significant variations in kinetic metrics, such as K1, k2, and k3, and Ki, were observed among normal organs with high [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake and pathological lesions. The high Ki value in normal organs was primarily determined by elevated K1 and low k3, rather than k2. Conversely, the high Ki value in pathological lesions, ranking second to the kidney and similar to salivary glands and spleen, was predominantly determined by the highest k3 value. Notably, k3 exhibited the highest performance in distinguishing between physiological and pathological [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.844 (95% CI, 0.773-0.915), sensitivity of 82.9%, and specificity of 74.1%. The k3 values showed better performance than SUVmean (AUC, 0.659), SUVmax (AUC, 0.637), and other kinetic parameter including K1 (AUC, 0.604), k2 (AUC, 0.634), and Ki (AUC, 0.651). CONCLUSIONS Significant discrepancies in kinetic metrics were detected between pathological lesions and normal organs, despite their shared high uptake of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. Notably, the k3 value exhibits a noteworthy capability to distinguish between pathological lesions and normal organs with elevated [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake. This discovery implies that k3 holds promise as a prospective imaging biomarker for distinguishing between pathologic and non-specific [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruohua Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Yee Ling Ng
- Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinlan Yang
- Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinjie Zhu
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Lianghua Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Haitao Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Gang Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Jianjun Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Flotufolastat F 18 (POSLUMA®) is an 18F-labelled radiohybrid (rh) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted imaging agent being developed by Blue Earth Diagnostics, a subsidiary of Bracco Imaging, for prostate cancer imaging. In May 2023, flotufolastat F 18 received its first approval in the USA as a radioactive diagnostic agent for positron emission tomography (PET) of PSMA positive lesions in men with prostate cancer with suspected metastasis who are candidates for initial definitive therapy or with suspected recurrence based on elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of flotufolastat F 18 leading to this first approval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-A Heo
- Springer Nature, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lindemann M, Oteiza A, Martin-Armas M, Guttormsen Y, Moldes-Anaya A, Berzaghi R, Bogsrud TV, Bach-Gansmo T, Sundset R, Kranz M. Glioblastoma PET/MRI: kinetic investigation of [ 18F]rhPSMA-7.3, [ 18F]FET and [ 18F]fluciclovine in an orthotopic mouse model of cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1183-1194. [PMID: 36416908 PMCID: PMC9931868 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06040-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common glioma and standard therapies can only slightly prolong the survival. Neo-vascularization is a potential target to image tumor microenvironment, as it defines its brain invasion. We investigate [18F]rhPSMA-7.3 with PET/MRI for quantitative imaging of neo-vascularization in GBM bearing mice and human tumor tissue and compare it to [18F]FET and [18F]fluciclovine using PET pharmacokinetic modeling (PKM). METHODS [18F]rhPSMA-7.3, [18F]FET, and [18F]fluciclovine were i.v. injected with 10.5 ± 3.1 MBq, 8.0 ± 2.2 MBq, 11.5 ± 1.9 MBq (n = 28, GL261-luc2) and up to 90 min PET/MR imaged 21/28 days after surgery. Regions of interest were delineated on T2-weighted MRI for (i) tumor, (ii) brain, and (iii) the inferior vena cava. Time-activity curves were expressed as SUV mean, SUVR and PKM performed using 1-/2-tissue-compartment models (1TCM, 2TCM), Patlak and Logan analysis (LA). Immunofluorescent staining (IFS), western blotting, and autoradiography of tumor tissue were performed for result validation. RESULTS [18F]rhPSMA-7.3 showed a tumor uptake with a tumor-to-background-ratio (TBR) = 2.1-2.5, in 15-60 min. PKM (2TCM) confirmed higher K1 (0.34/0.08, p = 0.0012) and volume of distribution VT (0.24/0.1, p = 0.0017) in the tumor region compared to the brain. Linearity in LA and similar k3 = 0.6 and k4 = 0.47 (2TCM, tumor, p = ns) indicated reversible binding. K1, an indicator for vascularization, increased (0.1/0.34, 21 to 28 days, p < 0.005). IFS confirmed co-expression of PSMA and tumor vascularization. [18F]fluciclovine showed higher TBR (2.5/1.8, p < 0.001, 60 min) and VS (1.3/0.7, p < 0.05, tumor) compared to [18F]FET and LA indicated reversible binding. VT increased (p < 0.001, tumor, 21 to 28 days) for [18F]FET (0.5-1.4) and [18F]fluciclovine (0.84-1.5). CONCLUSION [18F]rhPSMA-7.3 showed to be a potential candidate to investigate the tumor microenvironment of GBM. Following PKM, this uptake was associated with tumor vascularization. In contrast to what is known from PSMA-PET in prostate cancer, reversible binding was found for [18F]rhPSMA-7.3 in GBM, contradicting cellular trapping. Finally, [18F]fluciclovine was superior to [18F]FET rendering it more suitable for PET imaging of GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Lindemann
- PET Imaging Center Tromsø, University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromsø, Norway
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Ana Oteiza
- PET Imaging Center Tromsø, University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromsø, Norway
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Montserrat Martin-Armas
- PET Imaging Center Tromsø, University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromsø, Norway
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Yngve Guttormsen
- PET Imaging Center Tromsø, University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromsø, Norway
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Angel Moldes-Anaya
- PET Imaging Center Tromsø, University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromsø, Norway
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Rodrigo Berzaghi
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Trond Velde Bogsrud
- PET Imaging Center Tromsø, University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromsø, Norway
- PET Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Tore Bach-Gansmo
- PET Imaging Center Tromsø, University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromsø, Norway
| | - Rune Sundset
- PET Imaging Center Tromsø, University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromsø, Norway
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Mathias Kranz
- PET Imaging Center Tromsø, University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromsø, Norway.
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in primary prostate cancer diagnosis: First-line imaging is afoot. Cancer Lett 2022; 548:215883. [PMID: 36027998 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) is an excellent molecular imaging technique for prostate cancer. Currently, PSMA PET for patients with primary prostate cancer is supplementary to conventional imaging techniques, according to guidelines. This supplementary function of PSMA PET is due to a lack of systematic review of its strengths, limitations, and potential development direction. Thus, we review PSMA ligands, detection, T, N, and M staging, treatment management, and false results of PSMA PET in clinical studies. We also discuss the strengths and challenges of PSMA PET. PSMA PET can greatly increase the detection rate of prostate cancer and accuracy of T/N/M staging, which facilitates more appropriate treatment for primary prostate cancer. Lastly, we propose that PSMA PET could become the first-line imaging modality for primary prostate cancer, and we describe its potential expanded application.
Collapse
|
9
|
Langbein T, Wang H, Rauscher I, Krönke M, Knorr K, Wurzer A, Schwamborn K, Maurer T, Horn T, Haller B, Wester HJ, Eiber M. Utility of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 positron emission tomography for imaging of primary prostate cancer and pre-operative efficacy in N-staging of unfavorable intermediate to very high-risk patients validated by histopathology. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1334-1342. [PMID: 34992154 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
18F-rhPSMA-7.3, the lead compound of a new class of radiohybrid prostate-specific membrane antigen (rhPSMA) ligands, is currently in phase III trials for prostate cancer (PCa) imaging. Here, we describe our experience in primary PCa staging. Methods: We retrospectively identified 279 patients with primary PCa who underwent 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET/CT (staging cohort). A subset of patients (83/279) subsequently underwent prostatectomy with lymph node (LN) dissection without prior treatment (efficacy cohort). Distribution of tumor lesions was determined for the staging cohort and stratified by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score. Involvement of pelvic LN was assessed retrospectively by 3 blinded independent central readers, and a majority rule was used for analysis. Standard surgical fields were rated on a five-point scale independently for PET and for morphological imaging. Results were compared to histopathological findings on a patient-, right vs. -left, and template-basis. Results: For the staging cohort 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET was positive in 275/279 (98.6%), 106/279 (38.0%), 46/279 (16.5%), 65/279 (23.3%) and 5/279 (1.8%) patients for local, pelvic nodal, extrapelvic nodal, metastatic bone, and visceral metastatic disease. In the efficacy cohort, LN metastases were present in 24/83 patients (29%), located in 48/420 (11%) resected templates and in 33/166 (19.9%) hemi-pelvic templates in histopathology. Based on majority vote results, the patient-level sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for pelvic nodal metastases were 66.7% (95%CI, 44.7-83.6%), 96.6% (95%CI, 87.3-99.4%) and 88.0% (95%CI, 78.5-93.8%) for 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET and 37.5% (95%CI, 19.6-59.2%), 91.5% (95%CI, 80.6-96.8%) and 75.9% (95%CI, 65.0-84.3%) for morphological imaging, respectively. 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 showed higher interobserver agreement than morphological imaging (patient-level Fleiss' κ=0.54; 95%CI, 0.47-0.62 vs. 0.24; 95%CI, 0.17-0.31). A mean standardized uptake value ratio of 6.6 (95%CI, 5.2-8.1) documented a high image contrast between local tumors and adjacent low urinary tracer retention. Conclusion: 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET offers superior diagnostic performance to morphological imaging for primary N-staging of newly diagnosed PCa, shows lower inter-reader variation, and offers good distinction between primary tumor and bladder background activity. With increasing NCCN risk group an increasing frequency of extra-prostatic tumor lesions was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Langbein
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Hui Wang
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Isabel Rauscher
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Markus Krönke
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Karina Knorr
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | | | - Kristina Schwamborn
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Institute of Pathology, Germany
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik and Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Thomas Horn
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Urology, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Eiber
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Malaspina S, Taimen P, Kallajoki M, Oikonen V, Kuisma A, Ettala O, Mattila K, Boström PJ, Minn H, Kalliokoski K, Postema EJ, Miller MP, Scheinin M. Uptake of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Prostate Cancer: A Phase 1 Proof-of-Concept Study. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2021; 37:205-213. [PMID: 34962139 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2021.0322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Malaspina
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Pekka Taimen
- Institute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Center, University of Turku and Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Markku Kallajoki
- Institute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Center, University of Turku and Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Vesa Oikonen
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Anna Kuisma
- Department of Oncology and University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Kalle Mattila
- Department of Oncology and University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Peter J Boström
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Heikki Minn
- Department of Oncology and University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Kari Kalliokoski
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | | | - Mika Scheinin
- Institute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Center, University of Turku and Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Clinical Research Services Turku-CRST Ltd., Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Neels OC, Kopka K, Liolios C, Afshar-Oromieh A. Radiolabeled PSMA Inhibitors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:6255. [PMID: 34944875 PMCID: PMC8699044 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PSMA has shown to be a promising target for diagnosis and therapy (theranostics) of prostate cancer. We have reviewed developments in the field of radio- and fluorescence-guided surgery and targeted photodynamic therapy as well as multitargeting PSMA inhibitors also addressing albumin, GRPr and integrin αvβ3. An overview of the regulatory status of PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals in the USA and Europe is also provided. Technical and quality aspects of PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals are described and new emerging radiolabeling strategies are discussed. Furthermore, insights are given into the production, application and potential of alternatives beyond the commonly used radionuclides for radiolabeling PSMA inhibitors. An additional refinement of radiopharmaceuticals is required in order to further improve dose-limiting factors, such as nephrotoxicity and salivary gland uptake during endoradiotherapy. The improvement of patient treatment achieved by the advantageous combination of radionuclide therapy with alternative therapies is also a special focus of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver C. Neels
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Bautzner Landstrasse 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Bautzner Landstrasse 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany;
- Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, School of Science, Technical University Dresden, Mommsenstrasse 4, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - Christos Liolios
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Zografou, 15771 Athens, Greece;
- INRASTES, Radiochemistry Laboratory, NCSR “Demokritos”, Ag. Paraskevi Attikis, 15310 Athens, Greece
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Bern University Hospital (Inselspital), Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland;
| |
Collapse
|