Head-to-head comparison of [68 Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 in dynamic PET/CT evaluation of the same group of recurrent prostate cancer patients

Comparison of novel PSMA-targeting [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 with its albumin binding derivative [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a first-in-human study

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising target for diagnosis and radioligand therapy (RLT) of prostate cancer. Two novel PSMA-targeting radionuclide therapy agents, [177Lu]Lu-P17-087, and its albumin binder modified derivative, [177Lu]Lu-P17-088, were evaluated in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. The primary endpoint was dosimetry evaluation, the second endpoint was radiation toxicity assessment (CTCAE 5.0) and PSA response (PCWG3).

METHODS

Patients with PSMA-positive tumors were enrolled after [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan. Five mCRPC patients received [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 and four other patients received [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 (1.2 GBq/patient). Multiple whole body planar scintigraphy was performed at 1.5, 4, 24, 48, 72, 120 and 168 h after injection and one SPECT/CT imaging was performed at 24 h post-injection for each patient. Dosimetry evaluation was compared in both patient groups.

RESULTS

Patients showed no major clinical side-effects under this low dose treatment. As expected [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 with longer blood circulation (due to its albumin binding) exhibited higher effective doses than [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 (0.151 ± 0.036 vs. 0.056 ± 0.019 mGy/MBq, P = 0.001). Similarly, red marrow received 0.119 ± 0.068 and 0.048 ± 0.020 mGy/MBq, while kidney doses were 0.119 ± 0.068 and 0.046 ± 0.022 mGy/MBq, respectively. [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 demonstrated excellent tumor uptake and faster kinetics; while [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 displayed a slower washout and higher average dose (7.75 ± 4.18 vs. 4.72 ± 2.29 mGy/MBq, P = 0.018). After administration of [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 and [177Lu]Lu-P17-088, 3/5 and 3/4 patients showed reducing PSA values, respectively.

CONCLUSION

[177Lu]Lu-P17-088 and [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 displayed different pharmacokinetics but excellent PSMA-targeting dose delivery in mCRPC patients. These two agents are promising RLT agents for personalized treatment of mCRPC. Further studies with increased dose and frequency of RLT are warranted to evaluate the potential therapeutic efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

177Lu-P17-087/177Lu-P17-088 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (NCT05603559, Registered at 25 October, 2022). URL OF REGISTRY: https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT05603559 .

Determining the optimal pharmacokinetic modelling and simplified quantification method of [18F]AlF-P16-093 for patients with primary prostate cancer (PPCa)

PURPOSE

This paper discusses the optimization of pharmacokinetic modelling and alternate simplified quantification method for [18F]AlF-P16-093, a novel tracer for in vivo imaging of prostate cancer.

METHODS

Dynamic PET/CT scans were conducted on eight primary prostate cancer patients, followed by a whole-body scan at 60 min post-injection. Time-activity curves (TACs) were obtained by drawing volumes of interest for primary prostatic and metastatic lesions. Optimal kinetic modelling involved evaluating three compartmental models (1T2K, 2T3K, and 2T4K) accounting for fractional blood volume (Vb). The simplified quantification method was then determined based on the correlation between the static uptake measure and total distribution volume (Vt) obtained from the optimal pharmacokinetic analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 17 intraprostatic lesions, 10 lymph nodes, and 36 osseous metastases were evaluated. Visually, the contrast of the tumor increased and showed the steepest incline within the first few minutes, whereas background activity decreased over time. Full pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that a reversible two-compartmental (2T4K) model is the preferred kinetic model for the given tracer. The kinetic parameters K1, k3, Vb, and Vt were all significantly higher in lesions when compared with normal tissue (P < 0.01). Several simplified protocols were tested for approximating comprehensive dynamic quantification in tumors, with image-based SURmean (the ratio of tumor SUVmean to blood SUVmean) within the 28-34 min window found to be sufficient for approximating the total distribution Vt values (R2 = 0.949, P < 0.01). Both Vt and SURmean correlated significantly with the total serum prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) levels (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study introduced an optimized pharmacokinetic modelling approach and a simplified acquisition method for [18F]AlF-P16-093, a novel PSMA-targeted radioligand, highlighting the feasibility of utilizing one static PET imaging (between 30 and 60 min) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Note that the image-derived input function in this study may not reflect the true corrected plasma input function, therefore the interpretation of the associated kinetic parameter estimates should be done with caution.

First-in-human study of PSMA-targeting agent, [18F]AlF-P16-093: dosimetry and initial evaluation in prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

This is a first-in-human study to evaluate the radiation dosimetry of a new prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiopharmaceutical, [18F]AlF-P16-093, and also initial investigation of its ability to detect PSMA-positive tumors using PET scans in a cohort of prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

METHODS

The [18F]AlF-P16-093 was automatically synthesized with a GE TRACERlab. A total of 23 patients with histopathologically proven PCa were prospectively enrolled. Dosimetry and biodistribution study investigations were carried out on a subset of six (6) PCa patients, involving multiple time-point scanning. The mean absorbed doses were estimated with PMOD and OLINDA software.

RESULTS

[18F]AlF-P16-093 was successfully synthesized, and radiochemical purity was > 95%, and average labeling yield was 36.5 ± 8.3% (decay correction, n = 12). The highest tracer uptake was observed in the kidneys, spleen, and liver, contributing to an effective dose of 16.8 ± 1.3 μSv/MBq, which was ~ 30% lower than that of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093. All subjects tolerated the PET examination well, and no reportable side-effects were observed. The PSMA-positive tumors displayed rapid uptake, and they were all detectable within 10 min, and no additional lesions were observed in the following multi-time points scanning. Each patient had at least one detectable tumor lesion, and a total of 356 tumor lesions were observed, including intraprostatic, lymph node metastases, bone metastases, and other soft tissue metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

We report herein a streamlined method for high yield synthesis of [18F]AlF-P16-093. Preliminary study in PCa patients has demonstrated its safety and acceptable radiation dosimetry. The initial diagnostic study indicated that [18F]AlF-P16-093 PET/CT is efficacious and potentially useful for a widespread application in the diagnosis of PCa patients.

A prospective head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with primary prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance and biodistribution of two similar PET agents, [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, in the same group of primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

METHODS

Fifty patients with untreated, histologically confirmed PCa by needle biopsy were enrolled. Each patient underwent [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT within a week. In addition to visual analysis, the standardized uptake value (SUV) was measured for semiquantitative comparison and correlation analysis.

RESULTS

[68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT detected more positive tumors than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (202 vs. 190, P = 0.002), both for intraprostatic lesions (48 vs. 41, P = 0.016) and metastatic lesions (154 vs. 149, P = 0.125), especially for intraprostatic lesions in low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients (21/23 vs. 15/23, P = 0.031). Furthermore, [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT exhibited a significantly higher SUVmax for most matched tumors (13.7 ± 10.2 vs. 11.4 ± 8.3, P < 0.001). For normal organs, [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT showed significantly lower activity in the kidney (SUVmean: 20.1 ± 6.1 vs. 29.3 ± 9.1, P < 0.001) and urinary bladder (SUVmean: 6.5 ± 7.1 vs. 20.9 ± 17.4, P < 0.001), but displayed a higher uptake in the parotid gland (SUVmean: 8.7 ± 2.6 vs. 7.6 ± 2.1, P < 0.001), liver (SUVmean: 7.0 ± 1.9 vs. 3.7 ± 1.3, P < 0.001), and spleen (SUVmean: 8.2 ± 3.0 vs. 5.2 ± 2.2, P < 0.001) than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

[68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT demonstrated higher tumor uptake and better tumor detectability than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, especially in low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients, which indicated that [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 may serve as an alternative agent for detection of PCa.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

68Ga-P16-093 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging in the Same Group of Primary Prostate Cancer Patients (NCT05324332, Registered 12 April 2022, retrospectively registered). URL OF REGISTRY: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05324332 .

Head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 and 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a pilot study

PURPOSE

This pilot study was prospectively designed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of PET/CT using a PSMA-specific tracer [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 and a glucose metabolism probe 2-[¹⁸F]FDG in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients.

METHODS

Forty-two pathologically confirmed ccRCC patients were included. Within 1 week, each patient underwent [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 and 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT. In addition to visual analysis of tumor number, the standardized uptake value (SUV) was measured for semiquantitative comparison and correlation analysis.

RESULTS

For primary ccRCC patients, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate (19/22 vs. 13/22, P = 0.031) and higher tumor uptake (15.7 ± 9.0 vs. 5.1 ± 3.4, P < 0.001) than 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT. In addition, the SUVmax of the primary tumor on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 and 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT was significantly correlated with pT stage (for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093, r = 0.550, P = 0.008; for 2-[¹⁸F]FDG, r = 0.514, P = 0.014) and WHO/ISUP grade (for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093, r = 0.566, P = 0.006; for 2-[¹⁸F]FDG, r = 0.492, P = 0.020), respectively. For metastatic ccRCC patients, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT also demonstrated a better detection rate (21/22 vs. 14/22, P = 0.008) and higher tumor uptake (11.0 ± 6.4 vs. 4.4 ± 2.7, P < 0.001) than 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT. The SUVmax on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT had a significant association with PSMA expression in primary ccRCC (r = 0.776, P < 0.001) and metastatic ccRCC (r = 0.626, P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT demonstrates significantly better tumor detectability than 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT for ccRCC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

⁶⁸Ga-P16-093 and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in the Same Group of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients (NCT05432947, Registered 27 June 2021, retrospectively registered) URL OF REGISTRY: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05432947 .

Head-to-Head Comparison of 68 Ga-P16-093 and 68 Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT in Patients With Primary Prostate Cancer : A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of 68 Ga-P16-093 and 68 Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT in primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty untreated primary PCa patients were enrolled. Each patient underwent 68 Ga-P16-093 and 68 Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT within a week. In addition to visual analysis, SUV was measured for semiquantitative comparison and correlation analysis.

RESULTS

68 Ga-P16-093 PET/CT detected more positive tumors than 68 Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT (67 vs 56, P = 0.002), especially for intraprostatic lesions (29 vs 24, P = 0.025) and lymph node metastases (23 vs 17, P = 0.034). Further, 68 Ga-P16-093 PET/CT exhibited significantly higher SUV max of matched tumors (18.3 ± 14.4 vs 13.9 ± 11.8, P < 0.001). Besides, the SUV max of high-risk patients (based on D'Amico classification) on 68 Ga-P16-093 PET/CT was significantly higher than that of low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients (20.9 ± 9.9 vs 8.9 ± 9.1 vs 10.1 ± 5.2, P = 0.007). The SUV max of tumor measured by 68 Ga-P16-093 PET/CT had a moderate association with biopsy Gleason score ( r = 0.462, P = 0.005) and prostate-specific antigen value ( r = 0.491, P = 0.002), and significantly correlated with PSMA expression ( r = 0.732, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

68 Ga-P16-093 PET/CT exhibited higher tumor uptake and potentially better tumor detection capability than 68 Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT, which suggested that 68 Ga-P16-093 may be more suitable in the diagnosis and staging of primary PCa patients.

Modern Developments in Bifunctional Chelator Design for Gallium Radiopharmaceuticals

The positron-emitting radionuclide gallium-68 has become increasingly utilised in both preclinical and clinical settings with positron emission tomography (PET). The synthesis of radiochemically pure gallium-68 radiopharmaceuticals relies on careful consideration of the coordination chemistry. The short half-life of 68 min necessitates rapid quantitative radiolabelling (≤10 min). Desirable radiolabelling conditions include near-neutral pH, ambient temperatures, and low chelator concentrations to achieve the desired apparent molar activity. This review presents a broad overview of the requirements of an efficient bifunctional chelator in relation to the aqueous coordination chemistry of gallium. Developments in bifunctional chelator design and application are then presented and grouped according to eight categories of bifunctional chelator: the macrocyclic chelators DOTA and TACN; the acyclic HBED, pyridinecarboxylates, siderophores, tris(hydroxypyridinones), and DTPA; and the mesocyclic diazepines.

An Explorative Study of the Incidental High Renal Excretion of [18F]PSMA-1007 for Prostate Cancer PET/CT Imaging

Positron emission tomography (PET) of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) allows for accurate diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer (PCa). Compared to other PSMA PET tracers available, [18F]PSMA-1007 is predominantly excreted via the hepatobiliary tract resulting in low renal excretion which improves evaluation of the pelvic area. However, some patients do show high urinary uptake of [18F]PSMA-1007. The present study aimed to investigate this sudden high urinary uptake of [18F]PSMA-1007 by evaluating [18F]PSMA-1007 PET scans from PCa patients. In this single-center retrospective study, patients that underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET imaging between July 2018 and January 2021 were included. Data regarding the individual patient characteristics, scan acquisition and batch production were analyzed. To determine the urinary excretion of [18F]PSMA-1007, a region of interest was drawn in the bladder, and standardized uptake values (SUVs) were calculated and compared to SUVs in the prostate. An SUVmax of >10 was considered high urinary excretion, an SUVmax 7.5−10 intermediate and an SUVmax < 7.5 low urinary excretion. A total of 344 patients underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT imaging, with 37 patients receiving three or more [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans. The mean SUVmean and SUVmax of the bladder were 3.9 (SD 2.9) and 5.9 (SD 4.2), respectively. Fourteen percent of patients showed high urinary uptake of [18F]PSMA-1007. Twelve of the thirty-seven patients (32.4%) that had multiple scans showed a varying urinary uptake of [18F]PSMA-1007 per PSMA PET/CT scan. In terms of patient characteristics, risk factors, medication and blood laboratory results, no significant influencing variables were found. Nor was there a difference observed in the batch size and the mean radiochemical purity of PSMA-1007 for high- and low-excreting patients. However, the bladder volume affected the mean SUVmax in the bladder significantly, with higher SUVs in lower bladder volumes. In this study, we observed that a higher SUV in the urinary tract seemed to occur in patients with low bladder volume. A prospective study is needed to corroborate this hypothesis.

Kit-based preparation of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 (PSMA-093) using different commercial 68Ge/68Ga generators

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an important biomarker for molecular imaging and a target for radionuclide therapy of prostate cancer. Recently, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 as a PSMA-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agent for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. As an alternative PSMA imaging agent, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 ([⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-093) showed excellent blood clearance and rapid tumor uptake, desirable in vivo properties for avidly detecting primary tumor and metastatic lesions in patients. To improve the availability and test the robustness of radiolabeling reaction, eluents of ⁶⁸Ga/HCl from different sources of generators were evaluated.

PROCEDURES

Commercially available ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga generators from Eckert & Ziegler, ITG and iThemba were eluted with varying molarities of hydrochloric acid (0.05-0.6 M, as recommended by each company) and reacted with P16-093 kits. Radiolabeling yields, in vitro stabilities, in vitro cell uptakes and drug release criteria of different preparations were investigated. PET/computed tomography (CT) imaging of prostate cancer patients with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 produced by using different sources of ⁶⁸Ga were performed.

RESULTS

Optimized P16-093 kit containing 15 μg of P16-093 (precursor) and 68 mg of sodium acetate trihydrate (buffer), a formulation previously tested in humans, was successfully labeled with eluents from Eckert & Ziegler, ITG and iThemba's generators. In vitro cell uptake studies showed that [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093, formulated with ITG and iThemba's generators, exhibited equivalent PSMA-specific uptakes. Clinical studies in prostate cancer patients exhibited exceedingly comparable maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for each lesion regardless of source of the generator used in preparation.

CONCLUSION

Using different vendors' generator and lyophilized P16-093 kits, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 could be conveniently and reliably prepared by a simple one-step reaction with excellent yields. Clinically useful doses of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-P16-093 imaging tracer could be made available using different ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga generators.