1
|
Ma Y, Zeng J, Ding F, Xu Y, Wang Y, Zhong G, Liu N, Wang Y, Li Y, Chen S, Wei X, Zhu P, Jian G, Niu YS, Fu G, Liu C, Li G, Zhou X, Zhang A, Weng S. Cerebral 18F-FDG PET/CT Metabolism as Diagnostic Signature for Central Nervous System Toxicity After Immune Checkpoint Blockade Cancer Treatment. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1129-1136. [PMID: 38697671 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Our aim was to investigate probable biomarkers specific to immune-related central nervous system toxicity (CNST) in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) by analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT images. Methods: Cancer patients receiving ICI treatment were enrolled in a multicenter observational study that analyzed regional metabolic changes before and during CNST onset from January 2020 to February 2022. In 1:1 propensity score-matched pairs, the regional SUVmean of each bilateral brain lobe of CNST patients (CNST+) was compared with that of patients who had central nervous system infections (CNSIs) and patients without CNST or CNSI (CNST-). In a validation cohort, patients were recruited from February 2022 to July 2023 and followed up for 24 wk after the start of ICI. Early changes in regional SUVmean at 5-6 wk after therapy initiation were evaluated for ability to predict later CNST onset. Results: Of 6,395 ICI-treated patients, 2,387 underwent prognostic 18F-FDG PET/CT and 125 of the scanned patients had CNST (median time from ICI treatment to onset, 9 wk; quartile range, 2-23 wk). Regional 18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmean changes were higher in CNST+ than in CNST- patients (117 patient pairs) but were lower than in CNSI patients (50 pairs). Differentiating analysis reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.88) for CNST+ versus CNST- and of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89) for CNST+ versus CNSI. Changes in SUVmean were also higher before CNST onset than for CNST- (60 pairs; AUC, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66-0.83). In a validation cohort of 2,878 patients, preonset changes in SUVmean reached an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.94) in predicting later CNST incidence. Conclusion: Brain regional hypermetabolism could be detected during and before CNST clinical onset. CNST may be a distinct pathologic entity versus brain infections defined by 18F-FDG PET/CT brain scans. Regional SUV differences may be translated into early diagnostic tools based on moderate differentiating accuracy in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifei Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Institute of Abdominal Surgery, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Cancer, and Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Regional Medical Center Binhai Campus, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jiling Zeng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fadian Ding
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Institute of Abdominal Surgery, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Cancer, and Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Regional Medical Center Binhai Campus, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yiwei Xu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Youlong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Hainan Hospital of People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Sanya, China
| | - Guanqing Zhong
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nianqi Liu
- Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Educational Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yanqi Wang
- Department of Orthopedics and Spine Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- School of Public Health, Shantou University, Shantou, China
| | - Yiming Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shuqin Chen
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Xiaolong Wei
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Pengfei Zhu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Guangmin Jian
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yu Si Niu
- Acute Communicable Disease Epidemiology Division, Dallas County Health and Human Services, Dallas, Texas
| | - Guangzhen Fu
- Key Clinical Laboratory of Henan Province, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China; and
| | - Cantong Liu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Guiqiang Li
- Department of Orthopedics and Spine Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Xiaotong Zhou
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Ao Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China;
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shangeng Weng
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Institute of Abdominal Surgery, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Cancer, and Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Regional Medical Center Binhai Campus, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wehlte L, Walter J, Daisenberger L, Kuhnle F, Ingenerf M, Schmid-Tannwald C, Brendel M, Kauffmann-Guerrero D, Heinzerling L, Tufman A, Pfluger T, Völter F. The Association between the Body Mass Index, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and SUV of the Non-Tumorous Lung in the Pretreatment [ 18F]FDG-PET/CT of Patients with Lung Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1139. [PMID: 38893665 PMCID: PMC11171792 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2024] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: A debate persists on the prognostic value of the pre-therapeutic standardized uptake value (SUV) of non-tumorous lung tissue for the risk assessment of therapy-related pneumonitis, with most studies lacking significant correlation. However, the influence of patient comorbidities on the pre-therapeutic lung SUV has not yet been systematically evaluated. Thus, we aimed to elucidate the association between comorbidities, biological variables and lung SUVs in pre-therapeutic [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Methods: In this retrospective study, the pre-therapeutic SUV in [18F]FDG-PET/CT was measured in non-tumorous areas of both lobes of the lung. SUVMEAN, SUVMAX and SUV95 were compared to a multitude of patient characteristics and comorbidities with Spearman's correlation analysis, followed by a Bonferroni correction and multilinear regression. Results: In total, 240 patients with lung cancer were analyzed. An elevated BMI was significantly associated with increased SUVMAX (β = 0.037, p < 0.001), SUVMEAN (β = 0.017, p < 0.001) and SUV95 (β = 0.028, p < 0.001). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) showed a significantly decreased SUVMAX (β = -0.156, p = 0.001), SUVMEAN (β = -0.107, p < 0.001) and SUV95 (β = -0.134, p < 0.001). Multiple other comorbidities did not show a significant correlation with the SUV of the non-tumorous lung. Conclusions: Failure to consider the influence of BMI and COPD on the pre-therapeutic SUV measurements may lead to an erroneous interpretation of the pre-therapeutic SUV and subsequent treatment decisions in patients with lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Wehlte
- Department of Medicine V, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Walter
- Department of Medicine V, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL CPC-M), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Lea Daisenberger
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Felix Kuhnle
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Ingenerf
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Diego Kauffmann-Guerrero
- Department of Medicine V, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL CPC-M), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Department of Medicine V, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL CPC-M), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Pfluger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Völter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Castagnoli F, Mencel J, Ap Dafydd D, Gough J, Drake B, Mcaddy NC, Withey SJ, Riddell AM, Koh DM, Shur JD. Response Evaluation Criteria in Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Cancers: Which to Use and How to Measure. Radiographics 2024; 44:e230047. [PMID: 38662587 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
As the management of gastrointestinal malignancy has evolved, tumor response assessment has expanded from size-based assessments to those that include tumor enhancement, in addition to functional data such as those derived from PET and diffusion-weighted imaging. Accurate interpretation of tumor response therefore requires knowledge of imaging modalities used in gastrointestinal malignancy, anticancer therapies, and tumor biology. Targeted therapies such as immunotherapy pose additional considerations due to unique imaging response patterns and drug toxicity; as a consequence, immunotherapy response criteria have been developed. Some gastrointestinal malignancies require assessment with tumor-specific criteria when assessing response, often to guide clinical management (such as watchful waiting in rectal cancer or suitability for surgery in pancreatic cancer). Moreover, anatomic measurements can underestimate therapeutic response when applied to molecular-targeted therapies or locoregional therapies in hypervascular malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma. In these cases, responding tumors may exhibit morphologic changes including cystic degeneration, necrosis, and hemorrhage, often without significant reduction in size. Awareness of pitfalls when interpreting gastrointestinal tumor response is required to correctly interpret response assessment imaging and guide appropriate oncologic management. Data-driven image analyses such as radiomics have been investigated in a variety of gastrointestinal tumors, such as identifying those more likely to respond to therapy or recur, with the aim of delivering precision medicine. Multimedia-enhanced radiology reports can facilitate communication of gastrointestinal tumor response by automatically embedding response categories, key data, and representative images. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Castagnoli
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., D.a.D., N.C.M., S.J.W., A.M.R., D.M.K., J.D.S.), Oncology (J.M.), Radiotherapy (J.G.), and Nuclear Medicine (B.D.), Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK; and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (F.C., D.M.K.)
| | - Justin Mencel
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., D.a.D., N.C.M., S.J.W., A.M.R., D.M.K., J.D.S.), Oncology (J.M.), Radiotherapy (J.G.), and Nuclear Medicine (B.D.), Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK; and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (F.C., D.M.K.)
| | - Derfel Ap Dafydd
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., D.a.D., N.C.M., S.J.W., A.M.R., D.M.K., J.D.S.), Oncology (J.M.), Radiotherapy (J.G.), and Nuclear Medicine (B.D.), Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK; and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (F.C., D.M.K.)
| | - Jessica Gough
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., D.a.D., N.C.M., S.J.W., A.M.R., D.M.K., J.D.S.), Oncology (J.M.), Radiotherapy (J.G.), and Nuclear Medicine (B.D.), Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK; and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (F.C., D.M.K.)
| | - Brent Drake
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., D.a.D., N.C.M., S.J.W., A.M.R., D.M.K., J.D.S.), Oncology (J.M.), Radiotherapy (J.G.), and Nuclear Medicine (B.D.), Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK; and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (F.C., D.M.K.)
| | - Naami Charlotte Mcaddy
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., D.a.D., N.C.M., S.J.W., A.M.R., D.M.K., J.D.S.), Oncology (J.M.), Radiotherapy (J.G.), and Nuclear Medicine (B.D.), Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK; and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (F.C., D.M.K.)
| | - Samuel Joseph Withey
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., D.a.D., N.C.M., S.J.W., A.M.R., D.M.K., J.D.S.), Oncology (J.M.), Radiotherapy (J.G.), and Nuclear Medicine (B.D.), Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK; and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (F.C., D.M.K.)
| | - Angela Mary Riddell
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., D.a.D., N.C.M., S.J.W., A.M.R., D.M.K., J.D.S.), Oncology (J.M.), Radiotherapy (J.G.), and Nuclear Medicine (B.D.), Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK; and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (F.C., D.M.K.)
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., D.a.D., N.C.M., S.J.W., A.M.R., D.M.K., J.D.S.), Oncology (J.M.), Radiotherapy (J.G.), and Nuclear Medicine (B.D.), Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK; and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (F.C., D.M.K.)
| | - Joshua David Shur
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., D.a.D., N.C.M., S.J.W., A.M.R., D.M.K., J.D.S.), Oncology (J.M.), Radiotherapy (J.G.), and Nuclear Medicine (B.D.), Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK; and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (F.C., D.M.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hermosilla P, Soto R, Vega E, Suazo C, Ponce J. Skin Cancer Detection and Classification Using Neural Network Algorithms: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:454. [PMID: 38396492 PMCID: PMC10888121 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
In recent years, there has been growing interest in the use of computer-assisted technology for early detection of skin cancer through the analysis of dermatoscopic images. However, the accuracy illustrated behind the state-of-the-art approaches depends on several factors, such as the quality of the images and the interpretation of the results by medical experts. This systematic review aims to critically assess the efficacy and challenges of this research field in order to explain the usability and limitations and highlight potential future lines of work for the scientific and clinical community. In this study, the analysis was carried out over 45 contemporary studies extracted from databases such as Web of Science and Scopus. Several computer vision techniques related to image and video processing for early skin cancer diagnosis were identified. In this context, the focus behind the process included the algorithms employed, result accuracy, and validation metrics. Thus, the results yielded significant advancements in cancer detection using deep learning and machine learning algorithms. Lastly, this review establishes a foundation for future research, highlighting potential contributions and opportunities to improve the effectiveness of skin cancer detection through machine learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Hermosilla
- Escuela de Ingeniería Informática, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Avenida Brasil 2241, Valparaíso 2362807, Chile (E.V.); (C.S.); (J.P.)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weisman AJ, Huff DT, Govindan RM, Chen S, Perk TG. Multi-organ segmentation of CT via convolutional neural network: impact of training setting and scanner manufacturer. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2023; 9:065021. [PMID: 37725928 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/acfb06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Automated organ segmentation on CT images can enable the clinical use of advanced quantitative software devices, but model performance sensitivities must be understood before widespread adoption can occur. The goal of this study was to investigate performance differences between Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) trained to segment one (single-class) versus multiple (multi-class) organs, and between CNNs trained on scans from a single manufacturer versus multiple manufacturers.Methods. The multi-class CNN was trained on CT images obtained from 455 whole-body PET/CT scans (413 for training, 42 for testing) taken with Siemens, GE, and Phillips PET/CT scanners where 16 organs were segmented. The multi-class CNN was compared to 16 smaller single-class CNNs trained using the same data, but with segmentations of only one organ per model. In addition, CNNs trained on Siemens-only (N = 186) and GE-only (N = 219) scans (manufacturer-specific) were compared with CNNs trained on data from both Siemens and GE scanners (manufacturer-mixed). Segmentation performance was quantified using five performance metrics, including the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC).Results. The multi-class CNN performed well compared to previous studies, even in organs usually considered difficult auto-segmentation targets (e.g., pancreas, bowel). Segmentations from the multi-class CNN were significantly superior to those from smaller single-class CNNs in most organs, and the 16 single-class models took, on average, six times longer to segment all 16 organs compared to the single multi-class model. The manufacturer-mixed approach achieved minimally higher performance over the manufacturer-specific approach.Significance. A CNN trained on contours of multiple organs and CT data from multiple manufacturers yielded high-quality segmentations. Such a model is an essential enabler of image processing in a software device that quantifies and analyzes such data to determine a patient's treatment response. To date, this activity of whole organ segmentation has not been adopted due to the intense manual workload and time required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy J Weisman
- AIQ Solutions, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Daniel T Huff
- AIQ Solutions, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | | | - Song Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sachpekidis C, Stein-Thoeringer CK, Kopp-Schneider A, Weru V, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Hassel JC. Can physiologic colonic [ 18F]FDG uptake in PET/CT imaging predict response to immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3709-3722. [PMID: 37452874 PMCID: PMC10547632 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06327-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
AIM The development of biomarkers that can reliably and early predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is crucial in melanoma. In recent years, the gut microbiome has emerged as an important regulator of immunotherapy response, which may, moreover, serve as a surrogate marker and prognosticator in oncological patients under immunotherapy. Aim of the present study is to investigate if physiologic colonic [18F]FDG uptake in PET/CT before start of ICIs correlates with clinical outcome of metastatic melanoma patients. The relation between [18F]FDG uptake in lymphoid cell-rich organs and long-term patient outcome is also assessed. METHODOLOGY One hundred nineteen stage IV melanoma patients scheduled for immunotherapy with ipilimumab, applied either as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab, underwent baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT. PET/CT data analysis consisted of standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) calculations in the colon as well as measurements of the colon-to-liver SUV ratios (CLRmean, CLRmax). Visual grading of colon uptake based on a four-point scale was also performed. Moreover, the spleen-to-liver SUV ratios (SLRmean, SLRmax) and the bone marrow-to-liver SUV ratios (BLRmean, BLRmax) were calculated. We also measured serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels as a marker for bacterial translocation and surrogate for mucosal defense homeostasis. The results were correlated with patients' best clinical response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) as well as clinical signs of colitis. RESULTS Median follow-up [95%CI] from the beginning of immunotherapy was 64.6 months [61.0-68.6 months]. Best response to treatment was progressive disease (PD) for 60 patients, stable disease (SD) for 37 patients, partial response (PR) for 18 patients, and complete response (CR) for 4 patients. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a trend for longer PFS and OS in patients with lower colonic SUV and CLR values; however, no statistical significance for these parameters as prognostic factors was demonstrated. On the other hand, patients showing disease control as best response to treatment (SD, PR, CR) had significantly lower colonic MTV and TLG than those showing PD. With regard to lymphoid cell-rich organs, significantly lower baseline SLRmax and BLRmax were observed in patients responding with disease control than progression to treatment. Furthermore, patients with lower SLRmax and BLRmax values had a significantly longer OS when dichotomized at their median. In multivariate analysis, PET parameters that were found to significantly adversely correlate with patient survival were colonic MTV for PFS, colonic TLG for PFS, and BLRmax for PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS Physiologic colonic [18F]FDG uptake in PET/CT, as assessed by means of SUV, before start of ipilimumab-based treatment does not seem to independently predict patient survival of metastatic melanoma. On the other hand, volumetric PET parameters, such as MTV and TLG, derived from the normal gut may identify patients showing disease control to immunotherapy and significantly correlate with PFS. Moreover, the investigation of glucose metabolism in the spleen and the bone marrow may offer prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Sachpekidis
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Christoph K Stein-Thoeringer
- Laboratory of Translational, Microbiome Science, Internal Medicine I, University Clinic Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Vivienn Weru
- Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Olatunji E, Swanson W, Patel S, Adeneye SO, Aina-Tofolari F, Avery S, Kisukari JD, Graef K, Huq S, Jeraj R, Joseph AO, Lehmann J, Li H, Mallum A, Mkhize T, Ngoma TA, Studen A, Wijesooriya K, Incrocci L, Ngwa W. Challenges and opportunities for implementing hypofractionated radiotherapy in Africa: lessons from the HypoAfrica clinical trial. Ecancermedicalscience 2023; 17:1508. [PMID: 37113724 PMCID: PMC10129374 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The rising cancer incidence and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) warrants an increased focus on adopting or developing approaches that can significantly increase access to treatment in the region. One such approach recommended by the recent Lancet Oncology Commission for sub-Saharan Africa is hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), which can substantially increase access to radiotherapy by reducing the overall duration of time (in days) each person spends being treated. Here we highlight challenges in adopting such an approach identified during the implementation of the HypoAfrica clinical trial. The HypoAfrica clinical trial is a longitudinal, multicentre study exploring the feasibility of applying HFRT for prostate cancer in SSA. This study has presented an opportunity for a pragmatic assessment of potential barriers and facilitators to adopting HFRT. Our results highlight three key challenges: quality assurance, study harmonisation and machine maintenance. We describe solutions employed to resolve these challenges and opportunities for longer term solutions that can facilitate scaling-up use of HFRT in SSA in clinical care and multicentre clinical trials. This report provides a valuable reference for the utilisation of radiotherapy approaches that increase access to treatment and the conduct of high-quality large-scale/multi-centre clinical trials involving radiotherapy. Trial registration Not available yet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Olatunji
- Co-first authors
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, MD 21205, USA
| | - William Swanson
- Co-first authors
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Saloni Patel
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, MD 21205, USA
| | - Samuel Olaolu Adeneye
- NSIA-LUTH Cancer Treatment Center, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos 100254, Nigeria
| | - Funmilayo Aina-Tofolari
- NSIA-LUTH Cancer Treatment Center, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos 100254, Nigeria
| | - Stephen Avery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | - Katy Graef
- BIO Ventures for Global Health, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Robert Jeraj
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
| | - Adedayo O Joseph
- NSIA-LUTH Cancer Treatment Center, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos 100254, Nigeria
| | - Joerg Lehmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Heng Li
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, MD 21205, USA
| | - Abba Mallum
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
- Department of Oncology, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban 4091, South Africa
| | - Thokozani Mkhize
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
- Department of Oncology, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban 4091, South Africa
| | - Twalib Athumani Ngoma
- Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Dar Es Salaam 3592, Tanzania
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, PO box 65001, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Andrej Studen
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
- Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
| | - Krishni Wijesooriya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Luca Incrocci
- Co-senior authors
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wilfred Ngwa
- Co-senior authors
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, MD 21205, USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Positron emission tomography molecular imaging to monitor anti-tumor systemic response for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1671-1688. [PMID: 36622406 PMCID: PMC10119238 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06084-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) achieve a milestone in cancer treatment. Despite the great success of ICI, ICI therapy still faces a big challenge due to heterogeneity of tumor, and therapeutic response is complicated by possible immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Therefore, it is critical to assess the systemic immune response elicited by ICI therapy to guide subsequent treatment regimens. Positron emission tomography (PET) molecular imaging is an optimal approach in cancer diagnosis, treatment effect evaluation, follow-up, and prognosis prediction. PET imaging can monitor metabolic changes of immunocytes and specifically identify immuno-biomarkers to reflect systemic immune responses. Here, we briefly review the application of PET molecular imaging to date of systemic immune responses following ICI therapy and the associated rationale.
Collapse
|
9
|
Predictive Biomarkers for Immune-Related Endocrinopathies following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020375. [PMID: 36672324 PMCID: PMC9856539 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, in the context of the increase in the life expectancy of cancer patients, special attention has been given to immunotherapy and, indeed, to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has increased rapidly, and approximately 40% of cancer patients are eligible for this treatment. Although their impact is valuable on cancer treatment, immune checkpoint inhibitors come with side effects, known as immune-related adverse effects. These can affect many systems, including cutaneous, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neural, and pulmonary systems. In this review, we focus on immune-related endocrinopathies that affect around 10% of all treated patients. Endocrine dysfunctions can manifest as hypophysitis, thyroid dysfunction, hypoparathyroidism, insulin-deficient diabetes mellitus, and primary adrenal insufficiency. Currently, there are multiple ongoing clinical trials that aim to identify possible predictive biomarkers for immune-related adverse effects. The design of those clinical trials relies on collecting a variety of biological specimens (tissue biopsy, blood, plasma, saliva, and stool) at baseline and regular intervals during treatment. In this review, we present the predictive biomarkers (such as antibodies, hormones, cytokines, human leukocyte antigens, and eosinophils) that could potentially be utilized in clinical practice in order to predict adverse effects and manage them appropriately.
Collapse
|
10
|
Gao Y, Wu C, Chen X, Ma L, Zhang X, Chen J, Liao X, Liu M. PET/CT molecular imaging in the era of immune-checkpoint inhibitors therapy. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1049043. [PMID: 36341331 PMCID: PMC9630646 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1049043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 04/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy, especially immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has paved a new way for the treatment of many types of malignancies, particularly advanced-stage cancers. Accumulating evidence suggests that as a molecular imaging modality, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can play a vital role in the management of ICIs therapy by using different molecular probes and metabolic parameters. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical data to support the importance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging in the treatment of ICIs, including the evaluation of the tumor microenvironment, discovery of immune-related adverse events, evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, and prediction of therapeutic prognosis. We also discuss perspectives on the development direction of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging, with a particular emphasis on possible challenges in the future. In addition, we summarize the researches on novel PET molecular probes that are expected to potentially promote the precise application of ICIs.
Collapse
|