The diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of FDG-PET/CT follow-up for patients on adjuvant immunotherapy for high-risk malignant melanoma

Organ-specific accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in identifying immune-related adverse events in patients with high-risk melanoma treated with adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the organ-specific accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in identifying immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with high-risk (stage III/IV) surgically resected melanoma treated with an adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and determine the incidence of irAEs within the first year after starting treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This registry-based study included individuals who had undergone surgical removal of melanoma and were undergoing adjuvant ICI treatment (either nivolumab or pembrolizumab). The study specifically enrolled patients who had undergone both a baseline and at least one subsequent follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT scan. Follow-up scans were performed every third month in the first year after surgery to screen for disease recurrence. We retrospectively compared the follow-up scans with baseline scans to identify irAEs. Clinical information on irAEs was obtained from medical records and served as a reference standard for determining the accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients with 363 [18F]FDG-PET/CT scans were included, and 65 patients (52.8%) developed irAEs. In decreasing order, the organ-specific incidences of irAEs were: skin 26/65 (40%), muscle and joints 21/65 (32.3%), intestines 13/65 (20%), thyroid gland 12/65 (18.5%), lungs 4/65 (6.2%), and heart 2/65 (3.1%). The sensitivities and specificities of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosing irAEs were: skin 19% (95% CI: 7-39%) and 95% (88-98%), muscles and joints 71% (48-89%) and 83% (75-90%), intestines 100% (75-100%) and 85% (77-91%); thyroid gland 92% (62-99%) and 95% (89-98%), lungs 75% (19-99%) and 90% (83-95%), and heart 50% (13-99%) and 97% (92-99%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

[18F]FDG-PET/CT generally had moderate to high sensitivities (except for skin and heart) and specificities in diagnosing irAEs in patients receiving adjuvant ICI; this could be suggested to be systematically assessed and reported in scan reports.

Diagnostic Performance of [18F]F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non-Ophthalmic Malignant Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of More Than 10,000 Melanoma Patients

We described the diagnostic performance of [18F]F-FDG-PET in malignant melanoma by conducting a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature. The study was designed following PRISMA-DTA. Original articles with adequate crude data for meta-analytic calculations that evaluated [18F]F-FDG-PET and compared it with a valid reference standard were considered eligible. The pooled measurements were calculated based on the data level (patient/lesion-based). Regarding sub-groups, diagnostic performances were calculated for local, regional and distant involvement. The bivariate model was employed to calculate sensitivity and specificity. The initial search resulted in 6678 studies. Finally, 100 entered the meta-analysis, containing 82 patient-based (10,403 patients) and 32 lesion-based (6188 lesions) datasets. At patient level, overall, [18F]F-FDG-PET had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 81% (95%CI: 73-87%) and 92% (95%CI: 90-94%), respectively. To detect regional lymph node metastasis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 56% (95%CI: 40-72%) and 97% (95%CI: 94-99%), respectively. To detect distant metastasis, they were 88% (95%CI: 81-93%) and 94% (95%CI: 91-96%), respectively. At lesion level, [18F]F-FDG-PET had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 70% (95%CI: 57-80%) and 94% (95%CI: 88-97%), respectively. Thus, [18F]F-FDG-PET is a valuable diagnostic modality for melanoma assessment. It was accurate in various clinical scenarios. However, despite its high specificity, it showed low sensitivity in detecting regional lymph node metastasis and could not replace lymph node biopsy.

PET-CT underestimates the true pathological extent of disease at lymphadenectomy for melanoma patients after systemic therapy

INTRODUCTION

Modern systemic therapy has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma. Currently, patients with clinically involved lymph nodes require lymphadenectomy with associated morbidities. Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT) has demonstrated accuracy in melanoma detection and response to therapy. We aimed to identify whether a PET-CT directed lymphatic resection after systemic therapy is oncologically sound.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy after systemic therapy for melanoma with a preoperative PET-CT. Examined demographic, clinical, and perioperative parameters including extent of disease, systemic therapy and response, and PET-CT findings compared to pathological outcomes. We compared patients with "as or less than expected" outcomes on pathology against those with "more than expected" pathological outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. In 28 (71.8%), pathological outcomes were "as or less than expected" by PET-CT, and in 11 (28.2%) pathological outcome were "more than expected". "More than expected" occurred more frequently with advanced disease at presentation with 75% presenting with regional/metastatic disease versus only 42.9% in the "as or less than expected" group (p = 0.015). Poor response to therapy also trended towards the "more than expected" group with only 27.3% favorable response versus 53.6% favorable response in the "as or less than expected" group, not statistically significant. Extent of disease on imaging failed to predict pathological concordance.

CONCLUSION

PET-CT underestimates pathological extent of disease in the lymphatic basin in 30% of patients after systemic therapy. We failed to identify predictors of more extensive disease and warn against limited PET-CT directed lymphatic resections.

The role of imaging and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with T3b-T4b melanoma with clinically negative disease

Background

Previous studies demonstrate minimal utility of pre-operative imaging for low-risk melanoma; however, imaging may be more critical for patients with high-risk disease. Our study evaluates the impact of peri-operative cross-sectional imaging in patients with T3b-T4b melanoma.

Methods

Patients with T3b-T4b melanoma who underwent wide local excision were identified from a single institution (1/1/2005 - 12/31/2020). Cross-sectional imaging was defined as body CT, PET and/or MRI in the perioperative period, with the following findings: in-transit or nodal disease, metastatic disease, incidental cancer, or other. Propensity scores were created for the odds of undergoing pre-operative imaging. Recurrence free survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

Results

A total of 209 patients were identified with a median age of 65 (IQR 54-76), of which the majority were male (65.1%), with nodular melanoma (39.7%) and T4b disease (47.9%). Overall, 55.0% underwent pre-operative imaging. There were no differences in imaging findings between the pre- and post-operative cohorts. After propensity-score matching, there was no difference in recurrence free survival. Sentinel node biopsy was performed in 77.5% patients, with 47.5% resulting in a positive result.

Conclusion

Pre-operative cross-sectional imaging does not impact the management of patients with high-risk melanoma. Careful consideration of imaging use is critical in the management of these patients and highlights the importance of sentinel node biopsy for stratification and decision making.

Artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis system supports diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter study

Background

This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis system (AI-CAD) emulating the diagnostic logic of radiologists for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, which contributed to clinical treatment decision-making.

Methods

A total of 689 ESCC patients with PET/CT images were enrolled from three hospitals and divided into a training cohort and two external validation cohorts. 452 CT images from three publicly available datasets were also included for pretraining the model. Anatomic information from CT images was first obtained automatically using a U-Net-based multi-organ segmentation model, and metabolic information from PET images was subsequently extracted using a gradient-based approach. AI-CAD was developed in the training cohort and externally validated in two validation cohorts.

Results

The AI-CAD achieved an accuracy of 0.744 for predicting pathological LNM in the external cohort and a good agreement with a human expert in two external validation cohorts (kappa = 0.674 and 0.587, p < 0.001). With the aid of AI-CAD, the human expert's diagnostic performance for LNM was significantly improved (accuracy [95% confidence interval]: 0.712 [0.669-0.758] vs. 0.833 [0.797-0.865], specificity [95% confidence interval]: 0.697 [0.636-0.753] vs. 0.891 [0.851-0.928]; p < 0.001) among patients underwent lymphadenectomy in the external validation cohorts.

Conclusions

The AI-CAD could aid in preoperative diagnosis of LNM in ESCC patients and thereby support clinical treatment decision-making.

Case report: Malignant melanoma of the lower limb with gastric metastasis

Introduction

Malignant melanoma with gastric metastasis is extremely rare. We report a case of gastric metastasis caused by malignant melanoma of the lower limb.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old woman was hospitalized for left plantar pain. The patient found a black maculopapular eruption on the left sole of her left foot, which caused pain when pressed, and the pain was aggravated by walking, so she went to our hospital for treatment. On the second day of admission, the lesion of the left foot was removed under local anesthesia, and the removed tissue was sent for pathological examination. Combined with immunohistochemistry, it was consistent with malignant melanoma. During hospitalization, the patient developed abdominal pain and asked for gastroscopy. Gastroscopy revealed two 0.5 cm × 0.6 cm spots that can be seen arising from the stomach mucosa which were slightly swollen, slightly black in the center, and without erosion, and no abnormality was found in the other parts. At the same time, a biopsy was taken under a gastroscope and pathology suggests malignant melanoma. The patient could not undergo subsequent treatment due to cost. The patient was followed up until February 2022 and was within the survival period.

Conclusion

Malignant melanoma gastric metastasis is extremely rare. When a patient has a previous history of melanoma surgery, this needs to be considered when gastrointestinal symptoms are present, and regular endoscopic screening is recommended. Early surgical treatment and postoperative chemotherapy or combined targeted therapy may improve the prognosis of patients.