1
|
Kesner AL, Brosch-Lenz J, Gear J, Lassmann M. Dosimetry Software for Theranostic Applications: Current Capabilities and Future Prospects. J Nucl Med 2025; 66:166-172. [PMID: 39778969 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Dosimetry is integral to informed implementation of radiopharmaceutical therapies, enabling personalized treatment planning and ensuring patient safety by calculating absorbed doses to organs and tumors. As the therapeutic radiopharmaceutical field continues to expand, dosimetry software has emerged as a crucial tool for optimization of treatment efficacy. This review discusses key features and capabilities that current dosimetry software solutions have or should have in the future. We highlight the need for standardization across platforms to support consistent and accurate dose calculations. Furthermore, we explore opportunities for advancing software, such as incorporating biologically effective dose modeling and improving uncertainty quantification. Looking ahead, we advocate for expanding infrastructure for open data sets and fostering ongoing collaboration between vendors and end users to guide the field toward greater integration and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L Kesner
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Jonathan Gear
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom; and
| | - Michael Lassmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pouget JP, Gabina PM, Herrmann K, Deandreis D, Konijnenberg M, Taieb D, van Leeuwen FWB, Kurth J, Eberlein U, Lassmann M, Lückerath K. EANM expert opinion: How can lessons from radiobiology be applied to the design of clinical trials? Part I: back to the basics of absorbed dose-response and threshold absorbed doses. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025; 52:1210-1222. [PMID: 39531084 PMCID: PMC11754366 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06963-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study by the EANM radiobiology working group aims to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) using radiopharmaceuticals approved by the EMA and FDA for neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. It seeks to understand the correlation between physical parameters such as absorbed dose and TRT outcomes, alongside other biological factors. METHODS We reviewed clinical studies on TRT, focusing on the relationship between physical parameters and treatment outcomes, and applying basic radiobiological principles to radiopharmaceutical therapy to identify key factors affecting therapeutic success. RESULTS The analysis revealed that mean absorbed dose alone is insufficient to predict treatment response or toxicity. For absorbed doses below a certain threshold, outcomes are unpredictable, while doses above this threshold improve the likelihood of biological responses. However, even at higher absorbed doses, response plateaus indicate the need for additional parameters to explain outcome variability, including heterogeneity in target expression, anatomical disease location, (epi)genetics, DNA repair capacity, and the tumor microenvironment, aspects that will be discussed in Part II of this analysis. CONCLUSION Understanding radiobiology is crucial for optimizing TRT. More dosimetric data is needed to refine treatment protocols. While absorbed dose is critical, it alone does not determine TRT outcomes. Future research should integrate biological parameters with physical dosimetry to enhance efficacy and minimize toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pierre Pouget
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France. Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre Le Cancer, INSERM U1194/IRCM, 208 Rue Des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France.
| | - Pablo Minguez Gabina
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Gurutzeta-Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Desirée Deandreis
- Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy and Paris Saclay University, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| | - Mark Konijnenberg
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Taieb
- Nuclear Medicine Diagnostic Imaging and Endoradiotherapy Center Aix-Marseille University CHU de La Timone, Marseille Cedex 5, Marseille, France
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jens Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Uta Eberlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Lassmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Lückerath
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao X, Jakobsson V, Tao Y, Zhao T, Wang J, Khong PL, Chen X, Zhang J. Targeted Radionuclide Therapy in Glioblastoma. ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES 2024. [PMID: 39042829 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.4c07850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
Despite the development of various novel therapies, glioblastoma (GBM) remains a devastating disease, with a median survival of less than 15 months. Recently, targeted radionuclide therapy has shown significant progress in treating solid tumors, with the approval of Lutathera for neuroendocrine tumors and Pluvicto for prostate cancer by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). This achievement has shed light on the potential of targeted radionuclide therapy for other solid tumors, including GBM. This review presents the current status of targeted radionuclide therapy in GBM, highlighting the commonly used therapeutic radionuclides emitting alpha, beta particles, and Auger electrons that could induce potent molecular and cellular damage to treat GBM. We then explore a range of targeting vectors, including small molecules, peptides, and antibodies, which selectively target antigen-expressing tumor cells with minimal or no binding to healthy tissues. Considering that radiopharmaceuticals for GBM are often administered locoregionally to bypass the blood-brain barrier (BBB), we review prominent delivery methods such as convection-enhanced delivery, local implantation, and stereotactic injections. Finally, we address the challenges of this therapeutic approach for GBM and propose potential solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaobin Zhao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119074, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore
- Theranostics Center of Excellence, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 11 Biopolis Way, Helios, Singapore 138667, Singapore
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Vivianne Jakobsson
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119074, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore
- Theranostics Center of Excellence, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 11 Biopolis Way, Helios, Singapore 138667, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Yucen Tao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119074, Singapore
- Theranostics Center of Excellence, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 11 Biopolis Way, Helios, Singapore 138667, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Tianzhi Zhao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119074, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore
- Theranostics Center of Excellence, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 11 Biopolis Way, Helios, Singapore 138667, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Jingyan Wang
- Xiamen University, School of Public Health, Xiang'an South Road, Xiamen 361102, China
| | - Pek-Lan Khong
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119074, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore
| | - Xiaoyuan Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119074, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore
- Theranostics Center of Excellence, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 11 Biopolis Way, Helios, Singapore 138667, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
- Departments of Surgery, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119074, Singapore
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore 138673, Singapore
| | - Jingjing Zhang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119074, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore
- Theranostics Center of Excellence, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 11 Biopolis Way, Helios, Singapore 138667, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stokke C, Gnesin S, Tran-Gia J, Cicone F, Holm S, Cremonesi M, Blakkisrud J, Wendler T, Gillings N, Herrmann K, Mottaghy FM, Gear J. EANM guidance document: dosimetry for first-in-human studies and early phase clinical trials. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:1268-1286. [PMID: 38366197 PMCID: PMC10957710 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06640-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
The numbers of diagnostic and therapeutic nuclear medicine agents under investigation are rapidly increasing. Both novel emitters and novel carrier molecules require careful selection of measurement procedures. This document provides guidance relevant to dosimetry for first-in human and early phase clinical trials of such novel agents. The guideline includes a short introduction to different emitters and carrier molecules, followed by recommendations on the methods for activity measurement, pharmacokinetic analyses, as well as absorbed dose calculations and uncertainty analyses. The optimal use of preclinical information and studies involving diagnostic analogues is discussed. Good practice reporting is emphasised, and relevant dosimetry parameters and method descriptions to be included are listed. Three examples of first-in-human dosimetry studies, both for diagnostic tracers and radionuclide therapies, are given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Stokke
- Department of Diagnostic Physics and Computational Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Silvano Gnesin
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Tran-Gia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Søren Holm
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Johan Blakkisrud
- Department of Diagnostic Physics and Computational Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Wendler
- Computer-Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
- Clinical Computational Medical Imaging Research, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Nic Gillings
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT West, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jonathan Gear
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT & Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fele-Paranj A, Saboury B, Uribe C, Rahmim A. Physiologically based radiopharmacokinetic (PBRPK) modeling to simulate and analyze radiopharmaceutical therapies: studies of non-linearities, multi-bolus injections, and albumin binding. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem 2024; 9:6. [PMID: 38252191 PMCID: PMC10803696 DOI: 10.1186/s41181-023-00236-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to develop a publicly shared computational physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to reliably simulate and analyze radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs), including probing of hot-cold ligand competitions as well as alternative injection scenarios and drug designs, towards optimal therapies. RESULTS To handle the complexity of PBPK models (over 150 differential equations), a scalable modeling notation called the "reaction graph" is introduced, enabling easy inclusion of various interactions. We refer to this as physiologically based radiopharmacokinetic (PBRPK) modeling, fine-tuned specifically for radiopharmaceuticals. As three important applications, we used our PBRPK model to (1) study the effect of competition between hot and cold species on delivered doses to tumors and organs at risk. In addition, (2) we evaluated an alternative paradigm of utilizing multi-bolus injections in RPTs instead of prevalent single injections. Finally, (3) we used PBRPK modeling to study the impact of varying albumin-binding affinities by ligands, and the implications for RPTs. We found that competition between labeled and unlabeled ligands can lead to non-linear relations between injected activity and the delivered dose to a particular organ, in the sense that doubling the injected activity does not necessarily result in a doubled dose delivered to a particular organ (a false intuition from external beam radiotherapy). In addition, we observed that fractionating injections can lead to a higher payload of dose delivery to organs, though not a differential dose delivery to the tumor. By contrast, we found out that increased albumin-binding affinities of the injected ligands can lead to such a differential effect in delivering more doses to tumors, and this can be attributed to several factors that PBRPK modeling allows us to probe. CONCLUSIONS Advanced computational PBRPK modeling enables simulation and analysis of a variety of intervention and drug design scenarios, towards more optimal delivery of RPTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Fele-Paranj
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Babak Saboury
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, US
| | - Carlos Uribe
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Arman Rahmim
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cicone F, Sjögreen Gleisner K, Sarnelli A, Indovina L, Gear J, Gnesin S, Kraeber-Bodéré F, Bischof Delaloye A, Valentini V, Cremonesi M. The contest between internal and external-beam dosimetry: The Zeno's paradox of Achilles and the tortoise. Phys Med 2024; 117:103188. [PMID: 38042710 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Radionuclide therapy, also called molecular radiotherapy (MRT), has come of age, with several novel radiopharmaceuticals being approved for clinical use or under development in the last decade. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a well-established treatment modality, with about half of all oncologic patients expected to receive at least one external radiation treatment over their disease course. The efficacy and the toxicity of both types of treatment rely on the interaction of radiation with biological tissues. Dosimetry played a fundamental role in the scientific and technological evolution of EBRT, and absorbed doses to the target and to the organs at risk are calculated on a routine basis. In contrast, in MRT the usefulness of internal dosimetry has long been questioned, and a structured path to include absorbed dose calculation is missing. However, following a similar route of development as EBRT, MRT treatments could probably be optimized in a significant proportion of patients, likely based on dosimetry and radiobiology. In the present paper we describe the differences and the similarities between internal and external-beam dosimetry in the context of radiation treatments, and we retrace the main stages of their development over the last decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cicone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Unit, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.
| | | | - Anna Sarnelli
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Luca Indovina
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jonathan Gear
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT & Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Silvano Gnesin
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
- Nantes Université, Université Angers, CHU Nantes, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, Médecine Nucléaire, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | | | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Unit of Radiation Research, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hirata K, Kamagata K, Ueda D, Yanagawa M, Kawamura M, Nakaura T, Ito R, Tatsugami F, Matsui Y, Yamada A, Fushimi Y, Nozaki T, Fujita S, Fujioka T, Tsuboyama T, Fujima N, Naganawa S. From FDG and beyond: the evolving potential of nuclear medicine. Ann Nucl Med 2023; 37:583-595. [PMID: 37749301 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-023-01865-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
The radiopharmaceutical 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has been dominantly used in positron emission tomography (PET) scans for over 20 years, and due to its vast utility its applications have expanded and are continuing to expand into oncology, neurology, cardiology, and infectious/inflammatory diseases. More recently, the addition of artificial intelligence (AI) has enhanced nuclear medicine diagnosis and imaging with FDG-PET, and new radiopharmaceuticals such as prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) have emerged. Nuclear medicine therapy using agents such as [177Lu]-dotatate surpasses conventional treatments in terms of efficacy and side effects. This article reviews recently established evidence of FDG and non-FDG drugs and anticipates the future trajectory of nuclear medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Hirata
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
| | - Koji Kamagata
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
| | - Daiju Ueda
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yanagawa
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Mariko Kawamura
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakaura
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Honjo Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Rintaro Ito
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Fuminari Tatsugami
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Yusuke Matsui
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Akira Yamada
- Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-2621, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Fushimi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Taiki Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0016, Japan
| | - Shohei Fujita
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Fujioka
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuboyama
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Fujima
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, N15, W5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Shinji Naganawa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fernandes A, Oliveira A, Carvalho AL, Soares R, Barata P. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients Treated with Radioiodine. Nutrients 2023; 15:2680. [PMID: 37375584 DOI: 10.3390/nu15122680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, one of the most important bacteria of the human gut microbiota, produces butyrate (a short-chain fatty acid). Short-chain fatty acids are known to influence thyroid physiology and thyroid cancer's response to treatment. We aimed to analyze the relative abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii on the gut microbiota of differentiated thyroid cancer patients compared to controls and its variation after radioiodine therapy (RAIT). METHODS Fecal samples were collected from 37 patients diagnosed with differentiated thyroid cancer before and after radioiodine therapy and from 10 volunteers. The abundance of F. prausnitzii was determined using shotgun metagenomics. RESULTS Our study found that the relative abundance of F. prausnitzii is significantly reduced in thyroid cancer patients compared to volunteers. We also found that there was a mixed response to RAIT, with an increase in the relative and absolute abundances of this bacterium in most patients. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms that thyroid cancer patients present a dysbiotic gut microbiota, with a reduction in F. prausnitzii's relative abundance. In our study, radioiodine did not negatively affect F. prausnitzii, quite the opposite, suggesting that this bacterium might play a role in resolving radiation aggression issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Fernandes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Oliveira
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Luísa Carvalho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Raquel Soares
- Department of Biomedicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Barata
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gear J, Stokke C, Terwinghe C, Gnesin S, Sandström M, Tran-Gia J, Cremonesi M, Cicone F, Verburg F, Hustinx R, Giovanella L, Herrmann K, Gabiña PM. EANM enabling guide: how to improve the accessibility of clinical dosimetry. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1861-1868. [PMID: 37086275 PMCID: PMC10287783 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06226-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
Dosimetry can be a useful tool for personalization of molecular radiotherapy (MRT) procedures, enabling the continuous development of theranostic concepts. However, the additional resource requirements are often seen as a barrier to implementation. This guide discusses the requirements for dosimetry and demonstrates how a dosimetry regimen can be tailored to the available facilities of a centre. The aim is to help centres wishing to initiate a dosimetry service but may not have the experience or resources of some of the more established therapy and dosimetry centres. The multidisciplinary approach and different personnel requirements are discussed and key equipment reviewed example protocols demonstrating these factors are given in the supplementary material for the main therapies carried out in nuclear medicine, including [131I]-NaI for benign thyroid disorders, [177Lu]-DOTATATE and 131I-mIBG for neuroendocrine tumours and [90Y]-microspheres for unresectable hepatic carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Gear
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT & Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
| | - Caroline Stokke
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christelle Terwinghe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Silvano Gnesin
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mattias Sandström
- Section of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Sweden & Section of Medical Physics, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Johannes Tran-Gia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Radiation Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neuroscience Research Centre, PET/RM Unit, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital "Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Fredrik Verburg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roland Hustinx
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- GIGA-CRC in Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Luca Giovanella
- Clinic for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Pablo Minguez Gabiña
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Gurutzeta-Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
- Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Turner JH. Philosophy of Cancer Theranostics. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2023; 38:1-7. [PMID: 36493375 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2022.0082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Imagine a theranostic nuclear physician oncologist engaged in a Socratic philosophic dialogue. Questions that may be posed include the status of our current knowledge base of radiomolecular tumor biology, the meaning of precision in personalized dosimetry, the nature of responsibility for direct patient care, and the moral and ethical dimensions of individual quality of life (QOL) when survival is prolonged. This review invites reflective enquiry into one's personal practice of theranostics in cancer care, with the objective of optimizing clinical outcomes, not only in terms of prolonged survival but also individual QOL, in respect of its meaning for each patient, both physically and emotionally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Harvey Turner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pouget JP. Radiobiologie de la radiothérapie interne vectorisée. MÉDECINE NUCLÉAIRE 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mednuc.2023.01.151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
|
12
|
Bardiès M. Dosimétrie clinique en médecine nucléaire thérapeutique : statut et perspectives. MÉDECINE NUCLÉAIRE 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mednuc.2023.01.150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
|