PSMA-PET/CT-guided salvage radiotherapy in recurrent or persistent prostate cancer and PSA < 0.2 ng/ml

A Phase 1 Trial of Image Guided Risk Volume-Adapted Postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

This was a phase 1 trial with the primary objective of identifying the most compressed dose schedule (DS) tolerable using risk volume-adapted, hypofractionated, postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Secondary endpoints included biochemical progression-free survival and quality of life (QOL).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were treated with 1 of 3 isoeffective DSs (DS1: 20 fractions, DS2: 15 fractions, and DS3: 10 fractions) that escalated the dose to the imaging-defined local recurrence (73 Gy3 equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions) and de-escalated the dose to the remainder of the prostate bed (48 Gy3 equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions). Escalation followed a standard 3 + 3 design with a 6-patient expansion at the maximally tolerated hypofractionated DS. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0 grade (G) 3 toxicity lasting >4 days within 21 days of PORT completion or G4 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary toxicities thereafter. QOL was assessed longitudinally through 24 months with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite short form.

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and December 2023, 15 patients were treated (3 with DS1, 3 with DS2, and 9 with DS3). The median follow-up was 48 months. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed on any DS, and thus, expansion occurred at DS3. The cumulative incidence of G3 GI and genitourinary toxicity was 7% and 9% at 24 months, respectively, with no G4 events observed. Transient, acute G2+ GI toxicity was the most common. QOL worsened transiently during study follow-up in urinary incontinence, GI, and sexual subdomains but was similar to baseline by 24 months. The biochemical progression-free survival was 91% at both 24 and 60 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximally tolerated hypofractionated DS for hypofractionated, risk volume-adapted PORT was determined to be DS3 (36.4 Gy to the prostate bed and 47.1 Gy to the imaging-defined recurrence in 10 daily fractions). No >G3 events were observed. Transient declines in QOL did not persist through 24 months.

The superior detection rate of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT compared to short axial field-of-view [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for early recurrent prostate cancer patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET imaging has been extensively utilized for the detection of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer. However, the detection rate declines to merely 10-40% when PSA levels are < 0.2 ng/mL employing short axial field-of-view (SAFOV) PET. Prior studies exhibited superior detection rates with total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET in BCR patients with PSA > 0.2 ng/mL. Nevertheless, the diagnostic utility of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET for BCR patients when PSA is < 0.2 ng/mL remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT could improve the detection rate compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL.

METHODS

Eighty BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL underwent total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. These patients were matched by baseline qualities to another 80 patients who received SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The detection rates of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were compared utilizing a chi-square test and stratified analysis. Image quality of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT and SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was assessed based on subjective scoring and objective parameters. The objective parameters measured were SUVmax, SUVmean, standard deviation (SD) of SUV, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of liver and gluteus maximus.

RESULTS

The image quality of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT was superior to that of SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in both early and delayed scans. The detection rate of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT for BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL was significantly higher than that of SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (73.75% vs. 43.75%, P < 0.001). Total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT resulted in noteworthy modifications to the treatment regimen when contrasted with SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

In BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL, total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT not only demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT but also led to significant alterations in treatment regimens.

Prostate cancer and elective nodal radiation therapy for cN0 and pN0-a never ending story? : Recommendations from the prostate cancer expert panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO)

For prostate cancer, the role of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for cN0 or pN0 patients has been under discussion for years. Considering the recent publications of randomized controlled trials, the prostate cancer expert panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) aimed to discuss and summarize the current literature. Modern trials have been recently published for both treatment-naïve patients (POP-RT trial) and patients after surgery (SPPORT trial). Although there are more reliable data to date, we identified several limitations currently complicating the definitions of general recommendations. For patients with cN0 (conventional or PSMA-PET staging) undergoing definitive radiotherapy, only men with high-risk factors for nodal involvement (e.g., cT3a, GS ≥ 8, PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml) seem to benefit from ENI. For biochemical relapse in the postoperative situation (pN0) and no PSMA imaging, ENI may be added to patients with risk factors according to the SPPORT trial (e.g., GS ≥ 8; PSA > 0.7 ng/ml). If PSMA-PET/CT is negative, ENI may be offered for selected men with high-risk factors as an individual treatment approach.

Can PSMA PET/CT help in dose-tailoring in post-prostatectomy radiotherapy?

There are few randomized trials to evaluate the use of PSMA-PET in the planning of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. There are two unresolved questions 1) should we increase the dose to lesions visible on PSMA-PET 2) can we reduce dose in the case of a negative PSMA-PET. In this review, we summarize and discuss the available evidence in the literature. We found that in general, there seems to be an advantage for dose-increase, but ta large recent study from the pre-PSMA era didn't show an advantage for dose escalation. Retrospective studies have shown that conventional doses to PSMA-PET-positive lesions seem sufficient. On the other hand, in the case of a negative PSMA-PET, there is no evidence that dose-reduction is possible. In the future, the combination of PSMA-PET with genomic classifiers could help in better identify patients who might benefit from either dose- de-or -increase. We further need to identify intraindividual references to help identify lesions with higher aggressiveness.

The Impact of PSMA PET/CT on Modern Prostate Cancer Management and Decision Making-The Urological Perspective

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET use in prostate cancer treatment has recently become a routinely used imaging modality by urologists. New, established data regarding its performance in different stages of prostate cancer, as well as gaining clinical knowledge with new tracers, drives the need for urologists and other clinicians to improve the utilization of this tool. While the use of PSMA PET/CT is more common in metastatic disease, in which it outperforms classical imaging modalities and drives treatment decisions and adjustments, recently, it gained ground in localized prostate cancer as well, especially in high-risk disease. Still, PSMA PET/CT might reveal lesions within the prostate or possibly locoregional or metastatic disease, not always representing true cancer when utilized in earlier stages of the disease, potentially adding diagnostic burden and changing treatment decisions. As urological treatment options advance toward focal treatments in localized organ-confined prostate cancer, recent reports suggest the utilization of PSMA PET/CT in treatment planning and follow-up and even when choosing active surveillance. This review aims to reveal the current perspective of urologists regarding its daily use.