1
|
Romano G, Zirafa CC, Calabrò F, Alì G, Manca G, De Liperi A, Proietti A, Manfredini B, Di Stefano I, Marciano A, Davini F, Volterrani D, Melfi F. Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study for the Detection of Micrometastases in Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Tomography 2024; 10:761-772. [PMID: 38787018 PMCID: PMC11125324 DOI: 10.3390/tomography10050058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Lymphadenectomy represents a fundamental step in the staging and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To date, the extension of lymphadenectomy in early-stage NSCLC is a debated topic due to its possible complications. The detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) is a strategy that can improve the selection of patients in which a more extended lymphadenectomy is necessary. This pilot study aimed to refine lymph nodal staging in early-stage NSCLC patients who underwent robotic lung resection through the application of innovative intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and the pathological evaluation using one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA). Clinical N0 NSCLC patients planning to undergo robotic lung resection were selected. The day before surgery, all patients underwent radionuclide computed tomography (CT)-guided marking of the primary lung lesion and subsequently Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) to identify tracer migration and, consequently, the area with higher radioactivity. On the day of surgery, the lymph nodal radioactivity was detected intraoperatively using a gamma camera. SLN was defined as the lymph node with the highest numerical value of radioactivity. The OSNA amplification, detecting the mRNA of CK19, was used for the detection of nodal metastases in the lymph nodes, including SLN. From March to July 2021, a total of 8 patients (3 female; 5 male), with a mean age of 66 years (range 48-77), were enrolled in the study. No complications relating to the CT-guided marking or preoperative SPECT were found. An average of 5.3 lymph nodal stations were examined (range 2-8). N2 positivity was found in 3 out of 8 patients (37.5%). Consequently, pathological examination of lymph nodes with OSNA resulted in three upstages from the clinical IB stage to pathological IIIA stage. Moreover, in 1 patient (18%) with nodal upstaging, a positive node was intraoperatively identified as SLN. Comparing this protocol to the usual practice, no difference was found in terms of the operating time, conversion rate, and complication rate. Our preliminary experience suggests that sentinel lymph node detection, in association with the accurate pathological staging of cN0 patients achieved using OSNA, is safe and effective in the identification of metastasis, which is usually undetected by standard diagnostic methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Romano
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (F.C.); (B.M.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Carmelina Cristina Zirafa
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (F.C.); (B.M.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Fabrizia Calabrò
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (F.C.); (B.M.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Greta Alì
- Pathological Anatomy, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.A.); (A.P.); (I.D.S.)
| | - Gianpiero Manca
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.M.); (A.M.); (D.V.)
| | - Annalisa De Liperi
- 2nd Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Agnese Proietti
- Pathological Anatomy, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.A.); (A.P.); (I.D.S.)
| | - Beatrice Manfredini
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (F.C.); (B.M.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Iosè Di Stefano
- Pathological Anatomy, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.A.); (A.P.); (I.D.S.)
| | - Andrea Marciano
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.M.); (A.M.); (D.V.)
| | - Federico Davini
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (F.C.); (B.M.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Duccio Volterrani
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.M.); (A.M.); (D.V.)
| | - Franca Melfi
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (F.C.); (B.M.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pisano G, Wendler T, Valdés Olmos RA, Garganese G, Rietbergen DDD, Giammarile F, Vidal-Sicart S, Oonk MHM, Frumovitz M, Abu-Rustum NR, Scambia G, Rufini V, Collarino A. Molecular image-guided surgery in gynaecological cancer: where do we stand? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06604-1. [PMID: 38233609 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06604-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this review is to give an overview of the current status of molecular image-guided surgery in gynaecological malignancies, from both clinical and technological points of view. METHODS A narrative approach was taken to describe the relevant literature, focusing on clinical applications of molecular image-guided surgery in gynaecology, preoperative imaging as surgical roadmap, and intraoperative devices. RESULTS The most common clinical application in gynaecology is sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Other promising approaches are receptor-target modalities and occult lesion localisation. Preoperative SPECT/CT and PET/CT permit a roadmap for adequate surgical planning. Intraoperative detection modalities span from 1D probes to 2D portable cameras and 3D freehand imaging. CONCLUSION After successful application of radio-guided SNB and SPECT, innovation is leaning towards hybrid modalities, such as hybrid tracer and fusion of imaging approaches including SPECT/CT and PET/CT. Robotic surgery, as well as augmented reality and virtual reality techniques, is leading to application of these innovative technologies to the clinical setting, guiding surgeons towards a precise, personalised, and minimally invasive approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giusi Pisano
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Thomas Wendler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Chair for Computer-Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Near Munich, Germany
| | - Renato A Valdés Olmos
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory & Section Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Daphne D D Rietbergen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory & Section Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Giammarile
- Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sergi Vidal-Sicart
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi iSunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maaike H M Oonk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Rufini
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Collarino
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Valdés Olmos RA, Collarino A, Rietbergen DDD, Pereira Arias-Bouda L, Giammarile F, Vidal-Sicart S. Setting-up a training programme for intraoperative molecular imaging and sentinel node mapping: how to teach? How to learn? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023:10.1007/s00259-023-06496-7. [PMID: 38030743 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06496-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current expansion of image-guided surgery is closely related to the role played by radio-guided surgery in supporting the sentinel node (SN) procedure during more than three decades. The so-called triple approach (lymphoscintigraphy, gamma probe detection and blue dye) was not only essential in the seminal validation of the SN procedure but also a first collective learning effort based on skill transfer and outcome-related evaluation which laid the fundaments to delineate the field of intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) based on a similar multimodality approach and multidisciplinary practice. METHODS These elements are also becoming valid in the current incorporation of SPECT/CT and PET/CT to existing and new protocols of IMI procedures and SN mapping concerning other clinical applications. On the other hand, there is a growing tendency to combine novel modern technologies in an allied role with gamma guidance in the operating room following the development of hybrid tracers and multimodal detection approaches. Against this background, learning initiatives are required for professionals working in this area. RESULTS This objective has led to a group of European practitioners with large experience in SN mapping and IMI applications to give shape to a programme made up out of specific learning modules aimed to be used as a conductive thread in peripherical or centralised training instances concerning the topic. CONCLUSION The presented work, written as a tutorial review, is placed in an available prior-art context and is primarily aimed at medical and paramedical practitioners as well as at hardware and software developers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato A Valdés Olmos
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Angela Collarino
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Daphne D D Rietbergen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lenka Pereira Arias-Bouda
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Giammarile
- Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria
| | - Sergi Vidal-Sicart
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|