1
|
Holzgreve A, Nitschmann A, Maier SH, Büttner M, Schönecker S, Marschner SN, Fleischmann DF, Corradini S, Belka C, la Fougère C, Bodensohn R, Albert NL, Niyazi M. FET PET-based target volume delineation for the radiotherapy of glioblastoma: A pictorial guide to help overcome methodological pitfalls. Radiother Oncol 2024; 198:110386. [PMID: 38880414 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
PET is increasingly used for target volume definition in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma, as endorsed by the 2023 ESTRO-EANO guidelines. In view of its growing adoption into clinical practice and upcoming PET-based multi-center trials, this paper aims to assist in overcoming common pitfalls of FET PET-based target delineation in glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA.
| | - Alexander Nitschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian H Maier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Marcel Büttner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Schönecker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Daniel F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barry N, Koh ES, Ebert MA, Moore A, Francis RJ, Rowshanfarzad P, Hassan GM, Ng SP, Back M, Chua B, Pinkham MB, Pullar A, Phillips C, Sia J, Gorayski P, Le H, Gill S, Croker J, Bucknell N, Bettington C, Syed F, Jung K, Chang J, Bece A, Clark C, Wada M, Cook O, Whitehead A, Rossi A, Grose A, Scott AM. [18]F-fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine positron emission tomography for radiotherapy target delineation: Results from a Radiation Oncology credentialing program. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100568. [PMID: 38585372 PMCID: PMC10998205 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The [18]F-fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) PET in Glioblastoma (FIG) study is an Australian prospective, multi-centre trial evaluating FET PET for newly diagnosed glioblastoma management. The Radiation Oncology credentialing program aimed to assess the feasibility in Radiation Oncologist (RO) derivation of standard-of-care target volumes (TVMR) and hybrid target volumes (TVMR+FET) incorporating pre-defined FET PET biological tumour volumes (BTVs). Materials and methods Central review and analysis of TVMR and TVMR+FET was undertaken across three benchmarking cases. BTVs were pre-defined by a sole nuclear medicine expert. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) confidence intervals (CIs) evaluated volume agreement. RO contour spatial and boundary agreement were evaluated (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], Jaccard index [JAC], overlap volume [OV], Hausdorff distance [HD] and mean absolute surface distance [MASD]). Dose plan generation (one case per site) was assessed. Results Data from 19 ROs across 10 trial sites (54 initial submissions, 8 resubmissions requested, 4 conditional passes) was assessed with an initial pass rate of 77.8 %; all resubmissions passed. TVMR+FET were significantly larger than TVMR (p < 0.001) for all cases. RO gross tumour volume (GTV) agreement was moderate-to-excellent for GTVMR (ICC = 0.910; 95 % CI, 0.708-0.997) and good-to-excellent for GTVMR+FET (ICC = 0.965; 95 % CI, 0.871-0.999). GTVMR+FET showed greater spatial overlap and boundary agreement compared to GTVMR. For the clinical target volume (CTV), CTVMR+FET showed lower average boundary agreement versus CTVMR (MASD: 1.73 mm vs. 1.61 mm, p = 0.042). All sites passed the planning exercise. Conclusions The credentialing program demonstrated feasibility in successful credentialing of 19 ROs across 10 sites, increasing national expertise in TVMR+FET delineation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Barry
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin A. Ebert
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Alisha Moore
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Roslyn J. Francis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Pejman Rowshanfarzad
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Ghulam Mubashar Hassan
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Sweet P. Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Back
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Benjamin Chua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane Womens Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mark B. Pinkham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrew Pullar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Claire Phillips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia
| | - Joseph Sia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Gorayski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Suki Gill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Jeremy Croker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Nicholas Bucknell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Catherine Bettington
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane Womens Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Farhan Syed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Kylie Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Joe Chang
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrej Bece
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine Clark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Mori Wada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Olivia Cook
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Angela Whitehead
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Alana Rossi
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Andrew Grose
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Andrew M. Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and School of Cancer Medicine La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harat M, Miechowicz I, Rakowska J, Zarębska I, Małkowski B. A Biopsy-Controlled Prospective Study of Contrast-Enhancing Diffuse Glioma Infiltration Based on FET-PET and FLAIR. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1265. [PMID: 38610944 PMCID: PMC11010945 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Accurately defining glioma infiltration is crucial for optimizing radiotherapy and surgery, but glioma infiltration is heterogeneous and MRI imperfectly defines the tumor extent. Currently, it is impossible to determine the tumor infiltration gradient within a FLAIR signal. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET)-PET often reveals high-grade glioma infiltration beyond contrast-enhancing areas on MRI. Here, we studied FET uptake dynamics in tumor and normal brain structures by dual-timepoint (10 min and 40-60 min post-injection) acquisition to optimize analysis protocols for defining glioma infiltration. Over 300 serial stereotactic biopsies from 23 patients (mean age 47, 12 female/11 male) of diffuse contrast-enhancing gliomas were taken from areas inside and outside contrast enhancement or outside the FET hotspot but inside FLAIR. The final diagnosis was G4 in 11, grade 3 in 10, and grade 2 in 2 patients. The target-to-background (TBRs) ratios and standardized uptake values (SUVs) were calculated in areas used for biopsy planning and in background structures. The optimal method and threshold values were determined to find a preferred strategy for defining glioma infiltration. Standard thresholding (1.6× uptake in the contralateral brain) in standard acquisition PET images differentiated a tumor of any grade from astrogliosis, although the uptake in astrogliosis and grade 2 glioma was similar. Analyzing an optimal strategy for infiltration volume definition astrogliosis could be accurately differentiated from tumor samples using a choroid plexus as a background. Early acquisition improved the AUC in many cases, especially within FLAIR, from 56% to 90% sensitivity and 41% to 61% specificity (standard TBR 1.6 vs. early TBR plexus). The current FET-PET evaluation protocols for contrast-enhancing gliomas are limited, especially at the tumor border where grade 2 tumor and astrogliosis have similar uptake, but using choroid plexus uptake in early acquisitions as a background, we can precisely define a tumor within FLAIR that was outside of the scope of current FET-PET protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Harat
- Department of Neurooncology and Radiosurgery, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Science and Technology, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Izabela Miechowicz
- Department of Computer Science and Statistics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland;
| | - Józefina Rakowska
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, Poland;
| | - Izabela Zarębska
- Department of Radiotherapy, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland;
| | - Bogdan Małkowski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Albert NL, Galldiks N, Ellingson BM, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM, Cicone F, de Groot J, Koh ES, Law I, Le Rhun E, Mair MJ, Minniti G, Rudà R, Scott AM, Short SC, Smits M, Suchorska B, Tolboom N, Traub-Weidinger T, Tonn JC, Verger A, Weller M, Wen PY, Preusser M. PET-based response assessment criteria for diffuse gliomas (PET RANO 1.0): a report of the RANO group. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e29-e41. [PMID: 38181810 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00525-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) response criteria have been established and were updated in 2023 for MRI-based response evaluation of diffuse gliomas in clinical trials. In addition, PET-based imaging with amino acid tracers is increasingly considered for disease monitoring in both clinical practice and clinical trials. So far, a standardised framework defining timepoints for baseline and follow-up investigations and response evaluation criteria for PET imaging of diffuse gliomas has not been established. Therefore, in this Policy Review, we propose a set of criteria for response assessment based on amino acid PET imaging in clinical trials enrolling participants with diffuse gliomas as defined in the 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. These proposed PET RANO criteria provide a conceptual framework that facilitates the structured implementation of PET imaging into clinical research and, ultimately, clinical routine. To this end, the PET RANO 1.0 criteria are intended to encourage specific investigations of amino acid PET imaging of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - John de Groot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maximilian J Mair
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli IS, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin and City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Brain Tumour Centre, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Medical Delta, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy and IADI INSERM UMR 1254, Universitè de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center For Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Manzarbeitia-Arroba B, Hodolic M, Pichler R, Osipova O, Soriano-Castrejón ÁM, García-Vicente AM. 18F-Fluoroethyl-L Tyrosine Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics in the Differentiation of Treatment-Related Changes from Disease Progression in Patients with Glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:195. [PMID: 38201621 PMCID: PMC10778283 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The follow-up of glioma patients after therapeutic intervention remains a challenging topic, as therapy-related changes can emulate true progression in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. 18F-fluoroethyl-tyrosine (18F-FET) is a radiopharmaceutical that accumulates in glioma cells due to an increased expression of L-amino acid transporters and, contrary to gadolinium, does not depend on blood-brain barrier disruption to reach tumoral cells. It has demonstrated a high diagnostic value in the differentiation of tumoral viability and pseudoprogression or any other therapy-related changes, especially when combining traditional visual analysis with modern radiomics. In this review, we aim to cover the potential role of 18F-FET positron emission tomography in everyday clinical practice when applied to the follow-up of patients after the first therapeutical intervention, early response evaluation, and the differential diagnosis between therapy-related changes and progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marina Hodolic
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic;
| | - Robert Pichler
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine Kepler University Hospital—Neuromed Campus, 4020 Linz, Austria; (R.P.); (O.O.)
| | - Olga Osipova
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine Kepler University Hospital—Neuromed Campus, 4020 Linz, Austria; (R.P.); (O.O.)
| | | | - Ana María García-Vicente
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital of Toledo, 45007 Toledo, Spain; (B.M.-A.); (Á.M.S.-C.)
| |
Collapse
|