Constrictive pericarditis at abdominal CT: a commonly overlooked diagnosis

Dynamic assessment of the central vein throughout the cardiac cycle in adults with no right heart disease by cardiac CT

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the cardiac cycle on the vena cava and determine the phase of measuring maximum diameters.

METHODS

A total of 152 patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography (CT) were included. Patients' basic information was collected. The major axis, minor axis, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the vena cava in 10 phases reconstructed at 10% step from 5% to 95% R-R interval were measured in four planes (SVC1 layer: the bifurcation of the pulmonary artery; SVC2 layer: the superior vena cava (SVC) into the right atrium; IVC1 layer: the intersection of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the right atrium; IVC2 layer: the IVC into the anterior hepatic plane). The difference in vena cava diameters between cardiac cycles was determined using the linear mixed model.

RESULTS

The variations in diameter and CSA of the SVC in cardiac cycles were statistically significant (p < 0.05), while those of the suprahepatic IVC were not. In the SVC1 layer, the maximum value of the SVC major and minor axes was observed in 85% and 45% phases, respectively, while that in the SVC2 layer was observed in 45% phases. The maximum SVC diameters in the SVC1 and SVC2 layers were 19.48 ± 2.57 mm and 17.43 ± 3.09 mm, respectively. The SVC and IVC diameters and CSA were positively correlated with the body surface area in the linear mixed model.

CONCLUSION

The maximum SVC diameter and CSA were mostly observed in 45% phase, which provides a reference for selecting the best phase to measure the abnormality of vena cava diameter in the future.

Constrictive pericarditis--a curable diastolic heart failure

Constrictive pericarditis can result from a stiff pericardium that prevents satisfactory diastolic filling. The distinction between constrictive pericarditis and other causes of heart failure, such as restrictive cardiomyopathy, is important because pericardiectomy can cure constrictive pericarditis. Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis is based on characteristic haemodynamic and anatomical features determined using echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, cardiac MRI, and CT. The Mayo Clinic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization haemodynamic diagnostic criteria for constrictive pericarditis are based on the unique features of ventricular interdependence and dissociation of intrathoracic and intracardiac pressures seen when the pericardium is constricted. A complete pericardiectomy can restore satisfactory diastolic filling by removing the constrictive pericardium in patients with constrictive pericarditis. However, if inflammation of the pericardium is the predominant constrictive mechanism, anti-inflammatory therapy might alleviate this transient condition without a need for surgery. Early diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis is, therefore, of paramount clinical importance. An improved understanding of how constrictive pericarditis develops after an initiating event is critical to prevent this diastolic heart failure. In this Review, we discuss the aetiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis, with a specific emphasis on how to differentiate this disease from conditions with similar clinical presentations.

Refractory ascites as the only presenting symptom of chronic calcified constrictive pericarditis: a diagnostic challenge

Extracardiac manifestations of constrictive pericarditis, such as massive ascites and liver cirrhosis, often cover the true situation and lead to a delayed diagnosis. A young female patient was referred to this hospital due to a 4-year history of refractory ascites as the only presenting symptom. A diagnosis of chronic calcified constrictive pericarditis was eventually established based on echocardiography, ultrasonography, and computed tomography. Cardiac catheterization was not performed. Pericardiectomy led to relief of her ascites. Refractory ascites warrants thorough investigation for constrictive pericarditis.

[Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental cardiac findings in non-ECG-gated chest CT scans]

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental cardiac findings in non-ECG-gated chest CT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Non-ECG-gated chest CT examinations of 300 patients were retrospectively analyzed for incidental cardiac findings. Subsequently, these findings were evaluated for their clinical relevance by a cardiologist.

RESULTS

A total of 107 out of 300 examined patients had 174 incidental cardiac findings including coronary calcification (90), aortic/mitral valve calcification (42), iatrogenic changes (23), pericardial effusion (6), dilatation of the heart (4), myocardial changes (3), thrombus in the left ventricle (2), constrictive pericarditis (2) and atrial myxoma (1). Of the cardiac findings 51% were described in the written report and in 53 out of the 107 patients the cardiac findings were unknown. Newly detected incidental findings from 8 patients were rated as clinically significant: pericardial effusion (4), constrictive pericarditis (1), thrombus in the left ventricle (1), atrial myxoma (1) and dilatation of the heart (1).

CONCLUSION

Incidental cardiac findings are frequent in non-ECG-gated chest CT and may have a high clinical relevance.

Imaging the pericardium: appearances on ECG-gated 64-detector row cardiac computed tomography

Multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) with its high spatial and temporal resolution has now become an established and complementary method for cardiac imaging. It can now be used reliably to exclude significant coronary artery disease and delineate complex coronary artery anomalies, and has become a valuable problem-solving tool. Our experience with MDCT imaging suggests that it is clinically useful for imaging the pericardium. It is important to be aware of the normal anatomy of the pericardium and not mistake normal variations for pathology. The pericardial recesses are visible in up to 44% of non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated MDCT images. Abnormalities of the pericardium can now be identified with increasing certainty on 64-detector row CT; they may be the key to diagnosis and therefore must not be overlooked. This educational review of the pericardium will cover different imaging techniques, with a significant emphasis on MDCT. We have a large research and clinical experience of ECG-gated cardiac CT and will demonstrate examples of pericardial recesses, their variations and a wide variety of pericardial abnormalities and systemic conditions affecting the pericardium. We give a brief relevant background of the conditions and reinforce the key imaging features. We aim to provide a pictorial demonstration of the wide variety of abnormalities of the pericardium and the pitfalls in the diagnosis of pericardial disease.

Classic images: Cardiac computed tomography

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) has evolved into a valuable clinical tool for cardiac evaluation. Cardiac CT is increasingly used for imaging of the coronary arteries for the evaluation of (suspected) coronary artery disease, but many other cardiac structures may be the topic for CT investigation. This article reviews general indications for cardiac CT imaging. Common variants and pathologies of the cardiovascular system are illustrated by clinical examples.