Solid renal masses: effectiveness and safety of image-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation

[Ablative therapy of small renal masses]

Renal cell cancer is nowadays predominantly diagnosed in early stages due to the widespread use of sectional imaging for unrelated symptoms. Small renal masses (<4 cm) feature a largely indolent biology with a very low risk for metastasis or even a benign biology in up to 30% of the cases. Consequently, there is a need for less invasive therapeutic alternatives to nephron-sparing surgery. Meanwhile, there is a broad portfolio of local ablation techniques to treat small renal tumors. These include the extensively studied radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation techniques as well as newer modalities like microwave ablation and irreversible electroporation as more experimental techniques. Tumor ablation can be performed percutaneously under image guidance or laparoscopically. In particular, the percutaneous approach is a less invasive alternative to nephron-sparing surgery with lower risk for complications. Comparative studies and meta-analyses report a higher risk for local recurrence after renal tumor ablation compared to surgery. However, long-term oncological results after treatment of small renal masses are promising and do not seem to differ from partial nephrectomy. The possibility for salvage therapy in case of recurrence also accounts for this finding. Especially old patients with an increased risk of surgical and anesthesiological complications as well as patients with recurrent and multiple hereditary renal cell carcinomas may benefit from tumor ablation. Tumor biopsy prior to intervention is associated with very low morbidity rates and is oncologically safe. It can help to assess the biology of the renal mass and prevent therapy of benign lesions.

[Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: update 2015]

BACKGROUND

Stage I renal cell carcinoma is a malignancy with a relatively good prognosis. The incidence of all renal cell carcinomas is approximately 9/100,000 persons. There are nearly 15,000 newly diagnosed patients every year (men twice as often as women).

TREND

In the last decade, a trend away from radical open resection towards nephron-sparing approaches has been observed. Currently, partial nephrectomy is the surgical gold standard for the treatment of small renal tumors. However, excellent clinical results are obtained using percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA): low complication rates and preservation of the renal function.

RESULTS

Primary and secondary technical success rates are 69-100% and 90-100%, respectively. In large series, major complication rates of RFA of 0-14% are reported. A relevant deterioration of renal function after RFA is very rare. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates, metastasis-free survival rates, cancer-specific survival rates, and overall survival rates are 88-93, 95-100, 98-100, and 58.3-85%, respectively. In this context, the lack of appropriate long-term data is often cited as a limitation.

CONCLUSION

Different meta-analyses come to the conclusion that in case of adequate tumor and patient selection RFA shows oncologic results comparable with surgical resection. Accepted indications for RFA are T1 renal tumors in patients with advanced age, significant comorbidities, reduced renal function, single kidney, and/or no wish for operation. Predictors for the success include tumor size and location as well as operator experience. To define the real efficacy of RFA in the treatment of renal tumors, randomized controlled clinical long-term studies are indicated.

Thermal Ablation of Renal Tumors: Indications, Techniques and Results

BACKGROUND

About 15,000 persons receive the diagnosis of kidney cancer in Germany every year. Surgical resection is the standard treatment for locally confined tumors, but minimally invasive thermoablative techniques are increasingly being used as well.

METHODS

This article is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed regarding the thermoablative techniques now used in clinical practice, with particular attention to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CA).

RESULTS

RFA and CA are suitable for patients who cannot undergo surgery because of comorbid illnesses or who have contralateral recurrences or a hereditary precancerous condition. The primary technical success rate of these procedures ranges from 88% to 100%. More than 95% of tumors under 3 cm in diameter can be completely ablated. Reported complication rates range from 1% to 7%. New data on long-term outcomes reveal metastasis-free survival rates of 88% to 99% five years after ablation. A major advantage of these procedures is that thermoablation does not impair renal function to any relevant extent and is thus a good option for patients with limited renal function or a single kidney.

CONCLUSION

The thermoablative techniques are an important addition to the armamentarium of effective treatments for locally confined renal tumors. The guidelines of the American and European urological societies now list thermoablation with RFA or CA as an option for the treatment of small renal tumors with curative intent. Thermoablation of renal tumors has not yet been studied in randomized controlled trials; these will be needed so that the efficacy of tumor control, survival rates, complication rates, and quality of life after treatment can be reliably evaluated to provide definitive confirmation of the value of interstitial techniques.

Analysis of radiofrequency ablation of small renal tumors in patients at high anesthetic and surgical risk: urologist experience with follow-up results in the initial six months

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the results of various types of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment of renal tumors in patients with excessive anesthetic and surgical risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for RFA performed in in high risk patients were retrospectively evaluated. Other RFA applications in patients with no anesthetic and/or surgical risk were excluded. RFA was by ultrasound or CT guided percutaneous (USG/CT-PRFA) and retroperitoneally or transperitoneally laparoscopic (R/T-LRFA) techniques under general or local anethesia. Follow-up data of enhanced CT or MRI after 1, 3 and 6 months were analysed for twelve RFA applications.

RESULTS

The RFA applications included 4 (40%) left-sided, 5 (50%) right-sided and 1 (10%) bilaterally RFA (simultaneously 1 right and 2 left). The localizations of tumors were 2 (16.6%) upper, 5 (41.6%) mid and 5 (41.6%) lower pole. The RFA applications included 9 (75%) USG-PRFA, 1 (8.3%) CT-PRFA, 1 (8.3%) T-LRFA and 1 (8.3%) R-LRFA. The mean age was 65.3 ± 8.5 (52-76) years. The mean tumor size was 29.6 ± 6.08 (15-40) mm. No complications related to the RFA were encountered in any of the cases. Failure (residual tumour) was determined in 8.3% (1/12) of USG-RFA application. The success rate was thus 91.7% (11/12). Other 1st, 3rd and 6th months follow-up data revealed no residua and recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA application appears to be safe as a less invasive and effective treatment modality in selected cases of small renal tumors in individuals with excessive anesthetic and also surgical risk.