1
|
Jacobson BC, Shami VM. Guidelines in Practice: The Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:397-399. [PMID: 37782289 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C Jacobson
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vasilakis T, Ziogas D, Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P, Koukoulioti E, Kapizioni C, Triantafyllou K, Facciorusso A, Papanikolaou IS. EUS-Guided Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions, What Is New? Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2176. [PMID: 37443568 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) are intramural lesions that arise underneath the gastric mucosa. SELs can be benign, but can also be malignant or have malignant potential. Therefore, correct diagnosis is crucial. Endosonography has been established as the diagnostic gold standard. Although the identification of some of these lesions can be carried out immediately, solely based on their echo characteristics, for certain lesions histological examination is necessary. Sometimes histology can be inconclusive, especially for smaller lesions. Therefore, new methods have been developed in recent years to assist decision making, such as contrast enhanced endosonography, EUS elastography, and artificial intelligence systems. In this narrative review we provide a complete overview of the gastric SELs and summarize the new data of the last ten years concerning the diagnostic advances of endosonography on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Vasilakis
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology Clinic, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Ziogas
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, 251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, 3 Kanellopoulou Str., 11525 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopoulio-Patision" General Hospital, 3-5, Theodorou Konstantopoulou Str., Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopoulio-Patision" General Hospital, 3-5, Theodorou Konstantopoulou Str., Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Koukoulioti
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Christina Kapizioni
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Section of Gastroenterology, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Naga YSE, Dhindsa BS, Deliwala S, Tun KM, Dhaliwal A, Ramai D, Bhat I, Singh S, Chandan S, Adler DG. Single-incision needle-knife biopsy for the diagnosis of GI subepithelial tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:640-645.e2. [PMID: 36460089 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS A histologic diagnosis of GI subepithelial tumors (SETs) is important because of the malignant potential of these lesions. The current modalities of choice, including EUS-guided FNA and biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) have demonstrated suboptimal diagnostic success. Single-incision with needle-knife (SINK) biopsy has emerged as an alternative diagnostic approach to increase tissue acquisition and diagnostic success. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the technical success, diagnostic success, and adverse events of SINK biopsy. METHODS We searched multiple databases including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to July 2022. The primary outcomes assessed were the technical success and diagnostic success of SINK in GI SETs. The secondary outcomes assessed were adverse events and whether immunohistochemical analysis could be successfully performed on tissue samples obtained via SINK. RESULTS Seven studies with a total of 219 SINK biopsy procedures were included in this meta-analysis. The technical success rate was 98.1% (95% CI, 94.9%-99.3%; P = .000; I2 = .0%), and the diagnostic success rate was 87.9% (95% CI, 82.6%-91.7%; P = .000; I2 = .0%). The immunohistochemical success rate was 88.3% (95% CI, 78.7%-93.9%; P = .000; I2 = 3.5%). The rate of adverse events was 7.5% (95% CI, 4.3%-12.7%; P = .00; I2 = 7.2%), and bleeding was the most common adverse event. CONCLUSION SINK biopsy is a safe diagnostic procedure with a high technical and diagnostic success in patients with GI SET. Further randomized controlled trials and direct comparison studies are needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassin Shams Eldien Naga
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Banreet Singh Dhindsa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Smit Deliwala
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kyaw Min Tun
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| | - Amaninder Dhaliwal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Florence, South Carolina, USA
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ishfaq Bhat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Shailender Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Centura Health, Denver, Colorado, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jia X, Wan L, Chen X, Ji W, Huang S, Qi Y, Cui J, Wei S, Cheng J, Chai F, Feng C, Liu Y, Zhang H, Sun Y, Hong N, Rao S, Zhang X, Xiao Y, Ye Y, Tang L, Wang Y. Risk stratification for 1- to 2-cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: visual assessment of CT and EUS high-risk features versus CT radiomics analysis. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:2768-2778. [PMID: 36449061 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09228-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the ability of CT and endoscopic sonography (EUS) in predicting the malignant risk of 1-2-cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) and to clarify whether radiomics could be applied for risk stratification. METHODS A total of 151 pathologically confirmed 1-2-cm gGISTs from seven institutions were identified by contrast-enhanced CT scans between January 2010 and March 2021. A detailed description of EUS morphological features was available for 73 gGISTs. The association between EUS or CT high-risk features and pathological malignant potential was evaluated. gGISTs were randomly divided into three groups to build the radiomics model, including 74 in the training cohort, 37 in validation cohort, and 40 in testing cohort. The ROIs covering the whole tumor volume were delineated on the CT images of the portal venous phase. The Pearson test and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm were used for feature selection, and the ROC curves were used to evaluate the model performance. RESULTS The presence of EUS- and CT-based morphological high-risk features, including calcification, necrosis, intratumoral heterogeneity, irregular border, or surface ulceration, did not differ between very-low and intermediate risk 1-2-cm gGISTs (p > 0.05). The radiomics model consisting of five radiomics features showed favorable performance in discrimination of malignant 1-2-cm gGISTs, with the AUC of the training, validation, and testing cohort as 0.866, 0.812, and 0.766, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Instead of CT- and EUS-based morphological high-risk features, the CT radiomics model could potentially be applied for preoperative risk stratification of 1-2-cm gGISTs. KEY POINTS • The presence of EUS- and CT-based morphological high-risk factors, including calcification, necrosis, intratumoral heterogeneity, irregular border, or surface ulceration, did not correlate with the pathological malignant potential of 1-2-cm gGISTs. • The CT radiomics model could potentially be applied for preoperative risk stratification of 1-2-cm gGISTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoxuan Jia
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Lijuan Wan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiaoshan Chen
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wanying Ji
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Shaoqing Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Yuangang Qi
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Jingjing Cui
- United Imaging Intelligence (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Yongteng North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100094, China
| | - Shengcai Wei
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Jin Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Fan Chai
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Caizhen Feng
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Yulu Liu
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yingshi Sun
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Nan Hong
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Shengxiang Rao
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Xinhua Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Youping Xiao
- Department of Radiology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
| | - Yingjiang Ye
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
| | - Lei Tang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, 100142, China.
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu J, Wei G, Wang Y, Cai J. Multifeature Fusion Classification Method for Adaptive Endoscopic Ultrasonography Tumor Image. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2023; 49:937-945. [PMID: 36681611 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been found to be of great advantage in the diagnosis of digestive tract submucosal tumors. However, EUS-based diagnosis is limited by variability in subjective interpretation on the part of doctors. Tumor classification of ultrasound images with the computer-aided diagnosis system can significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency and accuracy of doctors. In this study, we proposed a multifeature fusion classification method for adaptive EUS tumor images. First, for different ultrasound tumor images, we selected the region of interest based on prior information to facilitate the estimation in the subsequent works. Second, we proposed a method based on image gray histogram feature extraction with principal component analysis dimensionality reduction, which learns the gray distribution of different tumor images effectively. Third, we fused the reduced grayscale features with the improved local binary pattern features and gray-level co-occurrence matrix features, and then used the multiclassification support vector machine. Finally, in the experiment, we selected the 431 ultrasound images of 109 patients in the hospital and compared the experimental effects of different features and different classifiers. The results revealed that the proposed method performed best, with the highest accuracy of 96.18% and an area under the curve of 99%. It is evident that the method proposed in this study can efficiently contribute to the classification of EUS tumor images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junke Wu
- College of Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoliang Wei
- Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yaolei Wang
- College of Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Cai
- College of Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:46-58. [PMID: 36602835 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Subepithelial lesions (SEL) of the GI tract represent a mix of benign and potentially malignant entities including tumors, cysts, or extraluminal structures causing extrinsic compression of the gastrointestinal wall. SEL can occur anywhere along the GI tract and are frequently incidental findings encountered during endoscopy or cross-sectional imaging. This clinical guideline of the American College of Gastroenterology was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation process and is intended to suggest preferable approaches to a typical patient with a SEL based on the currently available published literature. Among the recommendations, we suggest endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with tissue acquisition to improve diagnostic accuracy in the identification of solid nonlipomatous SEL and EUS fine-needle biopsy alone or EUS fine-needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation sampling of solid SEL. There is insufficient evidence to recommend surveillance vs resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) <2 cm in size. Owing to their malignant potential, we suggest resection of gastric GIST >2 cm and all nongastric GIST. When exercising clinical judgment, particularly when statements are conditional suggestions and/or treatments pose significant risks, health-care providers should incorporate this guideline with patient-specific preferences, medical comorbidities, and overall health status to arrive at a patient-centered approach.
Collapse
|
7
|
Khan S, Cui X, Nasir S, Rafiq SM, Qin B, Bai Q. Advances in endoscopic resection techniques of small gastric tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1001112. [PMID: 36091154 PMCID: PMC9453668 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1001112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are common gastrointestinal tumors typically originating from the muscularis propria layer of the stomach. Small gastric stromal tumors are usually detected incidentally during routine endoscopic examination. Although they may have malignant potentially, controversies remain regarding the need for endoscopic resection of small gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria. According to the guidelines of the European Society of Medical Oncology, all gastrointestinal stromal tumors >2 cm in size should be resected with endoscopic surveillance recommended for tumors <2 cm. Endoscopic resection including endoscopic mucosal dissection (EMD), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and snare assisted endoscopic resection. However, EMD and ESD procedures may be accompanied with serious complications including perforation, bleeding, and abdominal infection. Snare-assisted endoscopic resection is an alternative approach and has the advantages of a shorter procedure time and a low rate of perforation or bleeding. This study summarizes the safety and feasibility of a novel snare-assisted endoscopic resection technique and highlights the pros and cons of the different endoscopic approaches currently used for subepithelia small gastric tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suliman Khan
- Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, the Second Affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaona Cui
- Department of Anesthesiaology, the Second Affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Safyan Nasir
- Department of Medicine, Allied/District Headquarter Hospital Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Shoaib Mohammad Rafiq
- Department of Medicine, District Headquarter Hospital Gujranwala, Gujranwala, Pakistan
| | - Bo Qin
- Translational Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Bo Qin, ; Qian Bai,
| | - Qian Bai
- Department of Anesthesiaology, the Second Affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Bo Qin, ; Qian Bai,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Application of Endoscopic Ultrasound Combined with Multislice Spiral CT in Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Gastrointestinal Eminence Lesions. DISEASE MARKERS 2022; 2022:1417104. [PMID: 35811661 PMCID: PMC9259227 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1417104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the application of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) combined with multislice spiral CT (MSCT) in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with gastric eminence lesions. Methods A total of 160 patients with gastric eminence lesions enrolled in our hospital from June 2018 to June 2021 were included and received EUS and MSCT. The results of the two examinations and the postoperative pathological results were compared. Results The common pathological types of gastric eminence lesions include polyps and stromal tumors, with the most common sites of lesions in the gastric antrum, followed by the fundus of the stomach and the gastric body. Gastric eminence lesions mostly originate from the mucosal layer and muscularis mucosa, accounting for 83.13% of the total. With pathological results as the gold standard, the detection rate of MSCT was 90.63%, and that of EUS was 78.13%. With the joint diagnosis as a reference, the receiver operating curve (ROC) revealed a higher diagnostic efficiency of MSCT and EUS. Conclusion The accuracy of MSCT in the diagnosis of gastric eminence lesions is significantly higher than that of EUS, both of which can offer useful guidance for the choice of endoscopic treatment methods. The combination of MSCT and EUS examination before endoscopic gastroscopy may provide a better treatment efficacy on gastric protruding lesions with high safety.
Collapse
|
9
|
Goto O, Kaise M, Iwakiri K. Advancements in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors. Gut Liver 2021; 16:321-330. [PMID: 34456187 PMCID: PMC9099397 DOI: 10.5009/gnl210242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
A diagnosis of subepithelial tumors (SETs) is sometimes difficult due to the existence of overlying mucosa on the lesions, which hampers optical diagnosis by conventional endoscopy and tissue sampling with standard biopsy forceps. Imaging modalities, by using computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are mandatory to noninvasively collect the target's information and to opt candidates for further evaluation. Particularly, EUS is an indispensable diagnostic modality for assessing the lesions precisely and evaluating the possibility of malignancy. The diagnostic ability of EUS appears increased by the combined use of contrast-enhancement or elastography. Histology is the gold standard for obtaining the final diagnosis. Tissue sampling requires special techniques to break the mucosal barrier. Although EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is commonly applied, mucosal cutting biopsy and mucosal incision-assisted biopsy are comparable methods to definitively obtain tissues from the exposed surface of lesions and seem more useful than EUS-FNA for small SETs. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have a potential to drastically change the diagnostic strategy for SETs. Development and establishment of noninvasive methods including AI-assisted diagnosis are expected to provide an alternative to invasive, histological diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamu Goto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Kaise
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Iwakiri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Could computed tomography be used as a surrogate of endoscopic ultrasonography in the screening and surveillance of small gastric Gastrointestinal stromal tumors? Eur J Radiol 2020; 135:109463. [PMID: 33338760 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether computed tomography (CT) could be used for screening and surveillance of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs). METHOD A total of 162 pathologically confirmed small gGISTs (≤2 cm) between September 2007 and November 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Thirty-six lesions received contrast-enhanced CT after they were identified by endoscopy and EUS, and forty-three lesions received CT alone before surgery. The detection rate of CT for ≤1 cm gGISTs (micro-gGISTs) and 1-2 cm gGISTs (mini-gGISTs) was investigated, and the detection rate of CT alone was compared with that of CT following endoscopy and EUS. The relationship between EUS- and CT-detected high-risk features were assessed. RESULTS CT demonstrated a favorable detection rate for mini-gGISTs previously identified by EUS and endoscopy, whereas CT alone showed an inferior detection rate (100 % vs. 75 %, p = 0.02). CT showed a poor detection rate for micro-gGISTs, both for lesions received CT after identified by EUS and endoscopy, and those received CT alone (33.3 % vs. 14.8 %, p = 0.372). CT-detected heterogeneous enhancement pattern and presence of calcification were strongly correlated with heterogeneous echotexture (Spearman's ρ=0.66, p < 0.001) and echogenic foci (Spearman's ρ=0.79, p < 0.001) on EUS, respectively. CT-detected necrosis was moderately correlated with cystic spaces on EUS (Spearman's ρ=0.42, p = 0.02). No correlation was found between EUS- and CT- assessed irregular border. CONCLUSIONS CT could potentially be considered as a surrogate of EUS for surveillance of mini-gGISTs instead of micro-gGISTs, whereas couldn't be used as a screening modality for either micro- or mini-gGISTs.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang S, Luo H, Shen L. Clinical Efficacy of Single-Channel Gastroscopy, Double-Channel Gastroscopy, and Double Gastroscopy for Submucosal Tumors in the Cardia and Gastric Fundus. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1307-1313. [PMID: 31197688 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04286-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility and efficacy of single-channel gastroscopy, double-channel gastroscopy, and double gastroscopy in treating submucosal tumors in the cardia and gastric fundus. METHODS The data of 77 patients with submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the cardia and gastric fundus parts of the stomach who underwent single-channel gastroscopy, double-channel gastroscopy, and double gastroscopy were retrospectively analyzed. The observed therapeutic effect, complications, and local recurrence from these three groups were then compared. RESULTS All lesions were completely taken out under endoscopy, and the operation time for single-channel gastroscopy group was 20-90 min with an average of 44.5 min, and the postoperative hospitalization time was 5-9 days with an average of 7.5 days. The operation time for the double-channel gastroscopy group was 40-110 min with an average of 60.5 min, and the postoperative hospitalization time was 7-10 days with an average of 8.3 days, whereas the operation time of double gastroscopy group was 35-120 min with an average of 66.3 min, and the postoperative hospitalization time was 7-10 days with an average of 8.5 days. No patient was required to be transferred to the General Surgery Department for continuous treatment. Bleeding was noted from all the patients during operation, and hemostasis was performed successfully. Postoperative bleeding was not observed in any of the cases. Full-thickness resection was performed in all the three groups. No residual or recurrent lesions were detected via reexamination of gastroscopy in all the patients. CONCLUSION Single-channel gastroscopy, double-channel gastroscopy, and double gastroscopy present potential capability with distinctive advantages in the endoscopic treatment of submucosal tumors of the cardia and gastric fundus, and it also shows that appropriate operation methods should be selected based on the situation of an individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanshan Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Hubei Zhang Road (formerly Ziyang Road), Wuchang District No. 99, Jiefang Road 238, Wuhan, 430060, Hubei Province, China
| | - Hesheng Luo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Hubei Zhang Road (formerly Ziyang Road), Wuchang District No. 99, Jiefang Road 238, Wuhan, 430060, Hubei Province, China
| | - Lei Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Hubei Zhang Road (formerly Ziyang Road), Wuchang District No. 99, Jiefang Road 238, Wuhan, 430060, Hubei Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Park EY, Kim GH. Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors Using Endoscopic Ultrasonography or Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography: Which is Better? Clin Endosc 2019; 52:519-520. [PMID: 31722518 PMCID: PMC6900296 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2019.188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Young Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Gwang Ha Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kim SY, Shim KN, Lee JH, Lim JY, Kim TO, Choe AR, Tae CH, Jung HK, Moon CM, Kim SE, Jung SA. Comparison of the Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors. Clin Endosc 2019; 52:565-573. [PMID: 31311912 PMCID: PMC6900302 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2019.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most efficient imaging modality for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). However, abdominopelvic computed tomography (APCT) has other advantages in evaluating the characteristics, local extension, or invasion of SETs to adjacent organs. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic ability of EUS and APCT based on surgical histopathology results.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed data from 53 patients who underwent both EUS and APCT before laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric SETs from January 2010 to December 2017 at a single institution. On the basis of histopathology results, we assessed the diagnostic ability of the 2 tests.
Results The overall accuracy of EUS and APCT was 64.2% and 50.9%, respectively. In particular, the accuracy of EUS vs. APCT for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), leiomyomas, and ectopic pancreas was 83.9% vs. 74.2%, 37.5% vs. 0.0%, and 57.1% vs. 14.3%, respectively. Most of the incorrect diagnoses with EUS involved hypoechoic lesions originating in the fourth echolayer, with the most common misdiagnosed lesions being GISTs mistaken for leiomyomas and vice versa.
Conclusions APCT showed a lower overall accuracy than EUS; however, APCT remains a useful modality for malignant/potentially malignant gastric SETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Yoon Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Nam Shim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo-Ho Lee
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Young Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Oh Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - A Reum Choe
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chung Hyun Tae
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Kyung Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Mo Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Eun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Ae Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
CT Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound for Differentiating Small (2-5 cm) Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors From Leiomyomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213:586-591. [PMID: 31063418 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Abdominal CT or endoscopic ultrasound is recommended for the evaluation of gastric subepithelial tumors. However, few studies have compared the diagnostic performance of these two methods. We compared the diagnostic performance of CT versus endoscopic ultrasound for gastric subepithelial tumors smaller than 5 cm. We also identified significant CT findings associated with the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy-one patients with pathologically proven gastric subepithelial tumors were enrolled. We examined the diagnostic performance of CT compared with endoscopic ultrasound. We analyzed CT findings, including the location, long diameter (LD), short diameter (SD), LD-SD ratio, contour, margin, growth pattern, degree and pattern of enhancement, attenuation value, intralesional necrosis, calcification, hemorrhage, surface dimpling, and perilesional lymph node. RESULTS. Endoscopic ultrasound had a sensitivity of 77.6%, specificity of 61.5%, PPV of 90.0%, NPV of 38.1%, and accuracy of 74.6%. CT had a sensitivity of 84.5%, specificity of 53.8%, PPV of 89.1%, NPV of 43.8%, and accuracy of 78.9%. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of intralesional necrosis (odds ratio [OR], 10.88; p = 0.037) and an LD-SD ratio less than 1.5 (OR, 32.37; p = 0.002) were independent CT findings for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. CONCLUSION. CT is as effective as endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors smaller than 5 cm. Tumors with intralesional necrosis and an LD-SD ratio less than 1.5 may require further pathologic diagnosis.
Collapse
|
15
|
Ra JC, Lee ES, Lee JB, Kim JG, Kim BJ, Park HJ, Park SB, Choi BI. Diagnostic performance of stomach CT compared with endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:442-450. [PMID: 27654991 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0906-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the diagnostic ability of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) compared to endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) as a standard reference, and investigate the factors influencing the detection of small gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) (<5 cm) on MDCT with stomach protocol. METHODS We retrospectively investigated 70 patients who were suspected with gastric SETs on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and underwent both EUS and computed tomographic (CT) scanning. EUS was performed by two gastroenterologists, and location, size, echotexture, echogenicity, and layer of origin were described when gastric SETs were detected on EUS. MDCTs were reviewed based on consensus of two radiologists blinded to the EUS result. Size, location, enhancement pattern, and contour of the lesion detected on CT were described. We calculated the diagnostic ability of CT compared to EUS with respect to detection of gastric SETs, and investigated the factors influencing detection of SETs on CT. We also used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to obtain optimal cut-off size for predicting CT visibility of small SETs. RESULTS Of the 70 patients, who underwent both CT and EUS due to suspicious presence of SET on EGD, EUS detected 56 probable cases of SET and 14 cases of external compression. CT led to detection of 39 cases of SET out of the 56 cases. Sensitivity and specificity of CT was 69.6% and 100.0%, respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CT were 100.0% and 45.2%, respectively. There was a significant difference in mean size of CT-detected lesions compared to CT-invisible lesions (14.36 mm vs. 8.52 mm, p < 0.001), but no significant differences in terms of layer of origin and location between these two groups (p > 0.5) were observed. The ROC analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off value, also referred to prediction of CT visibility, was 10 mm. Out of 70 cases, 26 cases (37.14%) were identified as external compression or insignificant lesions such as lipoma, hemangioma, lymphangioma, or gastritis cystica on CT, and do not require regular follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Stomach CT shows good feasibility with respect to depiction of small SETs, especially in cases where size is larger than 10 mm. Henceforth, it is proposed that stomach CT would be a complimentary or problem-solving tool for SET in evaluating the presence of external compression and characterization of tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joon Chul Ra
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-755, Korea
| | - Eun Sun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-755, Korea.
| | - Jong Beum Lee
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-755, Korea
| | - Jae Gyu Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-755, Korea
| | - Beom Jin Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-755, Korea
| | - Hyun Jeong Park
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-755, Korea
| | - Sung Bin Park
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-755, Korea
| | - Byung Ihn Choi
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-755, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tamura T, Yamashita Y, Ueda K, Kawaji Y, Itonaga M, Murata SI, Yamamoto K, Yoshida T, Maeda H, Maekita T, Iguchi M, Tamai H, Ichinose M, Kato J. Rapid On-Site Evaluation by Endosonographers during Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Clin Endosc 2017; 50:372-378. [PMID: 28103654 PMCID: PMC5565049 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2016.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2016] [Revised: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been used to diagnose gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs). Although rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has been reported to improve the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions, on-site cytopathologists are not routinely available. Given this background, the usefulness of ROSE by endosonographers themselves for pancreatic tumors has also been reported. However, ROSE by endosonographers for diagnosis of SMT has not been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA with ROSE by endosonographers for SMT, focusing on diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), compared with that of EUS-FNA alone. METHODS Twenty-two consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA with ROSE by endosonographers for SMT followed by surgical resection were identified. Ten historical control subjects who underwent EUS-FNA without ROSE were used for comparison. RESULTS The overall diagnostic accuracy for SMT was significantly higher in cases with than without ROSE (100% vs. 80%, p=0.03). The number of needle passes by FNA with ROSE by endosonographers tended to be fewer, although accuracy was increased (3.3±1.3 vs. 5.9±3.8, p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS ROSE by endosonographers during EUS-FNA for SMT is useful for definitive diagnosis, particularly for GIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Tamura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yasunobu Yamashita
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Kazuki Ueda
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yuki Kawaji
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Itonaga
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Murata
- Department of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Kaori Yamamoto
- Department of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takeichi Yoshida
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Hiroki Maeda
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takao Maekita
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Mikitaka Iguchi
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Tamai
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masao Ichinose
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Jun Kato
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nishida T, Goto O, Raut CP, Yahagi N. Diagnostic and treatment strategy for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer 2016; 122:3110-3118. [PMID: 27478963 PMCID: PMC5096017 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Revised: 06/05/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are considered to be potentially malignant mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Clinically relevant GISTs are rare; however, subclinical GISTs (mini‐GISTs) (1‐2 cm) and pathologic GISTs (micro‐GISTs) (<1 cm) are frequently reported. Most mini‐GISTs and almost all micro‐GISTs of the stomach may exhibit benign clinical behavior, and only mini‐GISTs with high‐risk features may progress. For this review, a provisional algorithm was used to propose diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with small GISTs. Because surgery is the only potentially curative treatment, in its application for small GISTs, the principles of sarcoma surgery should be maintained, and cost effectiveness should be considered. Indications for surgery include GISTs measuring ≥2 cm, symptomatic GISTs, and mini‐GISTs with high‐risk features (irregular borders, cystic spaces, ulceration, echogenic foci, internal heterogeneity, and tumor progression during follow‐up); however, a preoperative pathologic diagnosis is infrequently obtained. For small intestinal and colorectal GISTs, surgery is indicated irrespective of size because of their greater malignant potential. Otherwise, mini‐GISTs without high‐risk features, micro‐GISTs, and small submucosal tumors measuring <5 cm without high‐risk features may be followed by periodical endoscopic ultrasonography. Although surgical approaches and operative methods are selected according to tumor size, location, growth pattern, and surgical teams, laparoscopic surgery has produced similar oncologic outcomes and is less invasiveness compared with open surgery. After resection, pathologic examination for diagnosis and risk assessment is mandatory, and genotyping is also recommended for high‐risk GISTs. Endoscopic resection techniques, although feasible, are not routinely indicated for most mini‐GISTs or micro‐GISTs. Cancer 2016;122:3110–8. © 2016 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are potentially malignant, and endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration may play a major role in the diagnosis of small GISTs and submucosal tumors. Surgery is indicated for all intestinal GISTs and for small gastric GISTs in patients who have symptoms and/or high‐risk features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshirou Nishida
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Osamu Goto
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chandrajit Premanand Raut
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Niimi K, Goto O, Kawakubo K, Nakai Y, Minatsuki C, Asada-Hirayama I, Mochizuki S, Ono S, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Isayama H, Fujishiro M, Koike K. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration skill acquisition of gastrointestinal submucosal tumor by trainee endoscopists: A pilot study. Endosc Ultrasound 2016; 5:157-64. [PMID: 27386472 PMCID: PMC4918298 DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.183970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an effective method for tissue diagnosis of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) that are difficult to diagnose by standard endoscopic biopsy. However, the learning curve, especially for gastrointestinal SMT, has not been sufficiently established. The aim of our study was to assess the skill acquisition and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for gastrointestinal SMT in trainee endoscopists in order to elucidate the optimal starting standards of EUS-FNA. MATERIALS AND METHODS We prospectively evaluated 51 EUS-FNA procedures for gastrointestinal SMT between May 2010 and March 2014. The procedure was performed by two trainee endoscopists and two expert endoscopists. We investigated the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA and the factors associated with the accuracy between the trainee endoscopists and expert endoscopists. RESULTS The rate of adequate EUS-FNA materials for histological examination was 86.3%. Although infections occurred in two cases (3.9%), which were managed conservatively, no severe complications were identified. Comparing the trainee endoscopists with expert endoscopists, there was no significant difference in the rate of gaining adequate specimen (76.5% vs. 82.3%, P = 0.4626). However, the mean number of passes of the trainees tended to be more than that of the expert endoscopists (2.1 pass vs. 1.7 pass, P = 0.0511), and lesions located in the middle third of the stomach were the predictive factors for nondiagnostic tumors by the trainee endoscopists (P = 0.0075). CONCLUSION EUS-FNA for gastrointestinal SMT by trainee endoscopists can be safely performed under the supervision of EUS-FNA expert endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Niimi
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Center for Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Goto
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chihiro Minatsuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Satoshi Mochizuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ono
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinya Kodashima
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Koike
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tsuji Y, Kusano C, Gotoda T, Itokawa F, Fukuzawa M, Sofuni A, Matsubayashi J, Nagao T, Itoi T, Moriyasu F. Diagnostic potential of endoscopic ultrasonography-elastography for gastric submucosal tumors: A pilot study. Dig Endosc 2016; 28:173-8. [PMID: 26530730 DOI: 10.1111/den.12569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2015] [Revised: 10/29/2015] [Accepted: 11/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Qualitative diagnosis for gastric submucosal tumors (SMT) is not easy. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in combination with EUS-elastography (EUS-EG) is reported useful for qualitatively diagnosing pancreatic tissues. We prospectively studied whether EUS-EG could be useful in qualitative diagnosis of gastric SMT. METHODS We prospectively registered 25 consecutive patients with gastric SMT diagnosed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy and carried out qualitative evaluations using EUS-EG (May 2013 to March 2015) followed by histopathological diagnosis using EUS-FNA or endoscopic mucosal cutting biopsy. Elastic scores of gastric SMT were compared to the cytological diagnosis. RESULTS Of 25 patients, 22 had a confirmed cytological diagnosis. Regarding the Giovannini elastic score, of three patients with aberrant pancreas, one was score 1 and two were score 2; of eight patients with leiomyoma, seven were score 2 and one was score 3. Both of two patients with schwannoma were score 4. Of nine patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor, six were score 4 and three were score 5. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is harder than other types of gastric SMT, and our study's findings suggested the usefulness of EUS-EG, which can also assess tumor hardness of gastric SMT. CONCLUSION EUS-EG might be helpful for the differential diagnosis of gastric SMT, especially to differentiate GIST from other SMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichiro Tsuji
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chika Kusano
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takuji Gotoda
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumihide Itokawa
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masakatsu Fukuzawa
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Sofuni
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Takao Itoi
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fuminori Moriyasu
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ectopic pancreas in the stomach successfully resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Case Rep Med 2015; 2015:147927. [PMID: 25878668 PMCID: PMC4387910 DOI: 10.1155/2015/147927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A 32-year-old Japanese man presented with a gastric submucosal tumor. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed a sessile submucosal tumor measuring approximately 10 mm in diameter on the greater curvature of the gastric antrum. Endoscopic ultrasonography examination revealed a solid tumor with a diameter of 11.8 mm, which was located in the deep mucosal and submucosal layers. The internal echogenicity was homogenous and hypoechoic. Biopsy examinations were performed twice but were not diagnostic since only the intact mucosal layer was obtained. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with ectopic pancreas in the stomach by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This case underscores the usefulness of the ESD technique for the pathological diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumors.
Collapse
|
21
|
Goto O, Uraoka T, Horii J, Yahagi N. Expanding indications for ESD: submucosal disease (SMT/carcinoid tumors). Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2014; 24:169-81. [PMID: 24679229 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2013.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for submucosal tumors (SMTs) within the superficial submucosal layer, but perforation frequently occurs during ESD for SMTs located at the deeper layer. Endoscopic resection for small esophageal SMTs is acceptable, although candidates for endoscopic removal are rare. Laparoscopic assistance will be effective for minimally invasive endoscopic local resection for certain types of gastric SMT. Endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device would be better than ESD for rectal carcinoid in terms of simplicity and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamu Goto
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Toshio Uraoka
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Joichiro Horii
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liu Z, Guo J, Sun S, Ren W, Tang S, Xie L, Huang L. Evaluation of transabdominal ultrasound after oral administration of an echoic cellulose-based gastric ultrasound contrast agent for demonstrating small gastric subepithelial masses. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 39:424-31. [DOI: 10.1007/s00261-013-0059-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
23
|
Nishida T, Kawai N, Yamaguchi S, Nishida Y. Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Dig Endosc 2013; 25:479-89. [PMID: 23902569 DOI: 10.1111/den.12149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2013] [Accepted: 06/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Small submucosal tumors (SMT) without symptoms are frequently found by endoscopic and radiological examinations. To find proper diagnostic measures and therapeutic indications for histologically undiagnosed SMT, we reviewed published articles in PubMed between 1990 and March 2013 using the key words 'submucosal tumor' and the name of a specific disease. SMT is observed in a wide range of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases and conditions, including compression by extra-GI organs and lesions, congenital tumors, inflammation, and benign as well as malignant neoplastic lesions. In the diagnosis of diseases and decision-making for therapy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) may play a key role. Symptomatic SMT and SMT histologically diagnosed as malignant or potentially malignant tumors such as gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) should be treated by surgery. SMT >5 cm, SMT increasing in size and those with'high-risk features' including irregular border, heterogeneous internal echo such as anechoic area, and heterogeneous enhancement by contrast media may also be removed by surgery. Laparoscopic approach is feasible for gastric GIST <5 cm and this is considered less invasive than the open approach. Emerging techniques using flexible endoscopes appear less invasive, but require further evidence and are still under clinical study. Correct diagnosis of SMT is challenging; however, EUS and EUS-FNA are useful in the histological diagnosis and clinical decision-making. In the future, minimally invasive approaches may be a mainstream of surgical treatment for small SMT.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kong SH, Yang HK. Surgical treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Gastric Cancer 2013; 13:3-18. [PMID: 23610714 PMCID: PMC3627804 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2013.13.1.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2013] [Revised: 03/09/2013] [Accepted: 03/10/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor is the most common mesenchymal tumor in the gastrointestinal tract and is most frequently developed in the stomach in the form of submucosal tumor. The incidence of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor is estimated to be as high as 25% of the population when all small and asymptomatic tumors are included. Because gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor is not completely distinguished from other submucosal tumors, a surgical excisional biopsy is recommended for tumors >2 cm. The surgical principles of gastrointestinal stromal tumor are composed of an R0 resection with a normal mucosa margin, no systemic lymph node dissection, and avoidance of perforation, which results in peritoneal seeding even in cases with otherwise low risk profiles. Laparoscopic surgery has been indicated for gastrointestinal stromal tumors <5 cm, and the indication for laparoscopic surgery is expanded to larger tumors if the above mentioned surgical principles can be maintained. A simple exogastric resection and various transgastric resection techniques are used for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in favorable locations (the fundus, body, greater curvature side). For a lesion at the gastroesophageal junction in the posterior wall of the stomach, enucleation techniques have been tried preserve the organ's function. Those methods have a theoretical risk of seeding a ruptured tumor, but this risk has not been evaluated by well-designed clinical trials. While some clinical trials are still on-going, neoadjuvant imatinib is suggested when marginally unresectable or multiorgan resection is anticipated to reduce the extent of surgery and the chance of incomplete resection, rupture or bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong-Ho Kong
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|