1
|
Lopes Vendrami C, Thorson DL, Borhani AA, Mittal PK, Hammond NA, Escobar DJ, Gabriel H, Recht HS, Horowitz JM, Kelahan LC, Wood CG, Nikolaidis P, Venkatesh SK, Miller FH. Imaging of Biliary Tree Abnormalities. Radiographics 2024; 44:e230174. [PMID: 39024175 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
Pathologic conditions of the biliary system, although common, can be difficult to diagnose clinically. Challenges in biliary imaging include anatomic variants and the dynamic nature of the biliary tract, which can change with age and intervention, blurring the boundaries of normal and abnormal. Choledochal cysts can have numerous appearances and are important to diagnose given the risk of cholangiocarcinoma potentially requiring surgical resection. Choledocholithiasis, the most common cause of biliary dilatation, can be difficult to detect at US and CT, with MRI having the highest sensitivity. However, knowledge of the imaging pitfalls of MRI and MR cholangiopancreatography is crucial to avoid misinterpretation. Newer concepts in biliary tract malignancy include intraductal papillary biliary neoplasms that may develop into cholangiocarcinoma. New paradigms in the classification of cholangiocarcinoma correspond to the wide range of imaging appearances of the disease and have implications for prognosis. Accurately staging cholangiocarcinoma is imperative, given expanding curative options including transplant and more aggressive surgical options. Infections of the biliary tree include acute cholangitis or recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, characterized by obstruction, strictures, and central biliary dilatation. Inflammatory conditions include primary sclerosing cholangitis, which features strictures and fibrosis but can be difficult to differentiate from secondary causes of sclerosing cholangitis, including more recently described entities such as immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis and COVID-19 secondary sclerosing cholangitis. The authors describe a wide variety of benign and malignant biliary tract abnormalities, highlight differentiating features of the cholangitides, provide an approach to interpretation based on the pattern of imaging findings, and discuss pearls and pitfalls of imaging to facilitate accurate diagnosis. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camila Lopes Vendrami
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Deanna L Thorson
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Amir A Borhani
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Pardeep K Mittal
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Nancy A Hammond
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - David J Escobar
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Helena Gabriel
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Hannah S Recht
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Jeanne M Horowitz
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Linda C Kelahan
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Cecil G Wood
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Paul Nikolaidis
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Sudhakar K Venkatesh
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| | - Frank H Miller
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.V., D.L.T., A.A.B., N.A.H., H.G., H.S.R., J.M.H., L.C.K., C.G.W., P.N., F.H.M.) and Pathology (D.J.E.), Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga (P.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim HS, Kang MJ, Kang J, Kim K, Kim B, Kim SH, Kim SJ, Kim YI, Kim JY, Kim JS, Kim H, Kim HJ, Nahm JH, Park WS, Park E, Park JK, Park JM, Song BJ, Shin YC, Ahn KS, Woo SM, Yu JI, Yoo C, Lee K, Lee DH, Lee MA, Lee SE, Lee IJ, Lee H, Im JH, Jang KT, Jang HY, Jun SY, Chon HJ, Jung MK, Chung YE, Chong JU, Cho E, Chie EK, Choi SB, Choi SY, Choi SJ, Choi JY, Choi HJ, Hong SM, Hong JH, Hong TH, Hwang SH, Hwang IG, Park JS. Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:161-202. [PMID: 38679456 PMCID: PMC11128785 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Sun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mee Joo Kang
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jingu Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital of Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Bohyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Hun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Soo Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong-Il Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Young Kim
- Department of Pathology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sil Kim
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haeryoung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hae Nahm
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Suk Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Eunkyu Park
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joo Kyung Park
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Myung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Byeong Jun Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong Chan Shin
- Department of Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Keun Soo Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Sang Myung Woo
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, Hospital, Immuno-Oncology Branch Division of Rare and Refractory Center, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Changhoon Yoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoungbun Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Ah Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Eun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Huisong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Im
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Kee-Taek Jang
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Young Jang
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Jun
- Department of Pathology, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Jae Chon
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Min Kyu Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Chung
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Uk Chong
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Services Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eunae Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae Byeol Choi
- Department of Surgery, Korea Universtiy Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seo-Yeon Choi
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Ji Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Young Choi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Jeong Choi
- Department of Pathology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyung Hong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Ho Hong
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Hye Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - In Gyu Hwang
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Seong Park
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
TGR5 (G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1, GPBAR-1) is a G protein-coupled receptor with seven transmembrane domains and is widely distributed in various organs and tissues. As an important bile acid receptor, TGR5 can be activated by primary and secondary bile acids. Increased expression of TGR5 is a risk factor for polycystic liver disease and hepatobiliary cancer. However, there is evidence that the anti-inflammatory effect of the TGR5 receptor and its regulatory effect on hydrophobic bile acid confer protective effects against most liver diseases. Recent studies have shown that TGR5 receptor activation can alleviate the development of diabetic liver fibrosis, regulate the differentiation of natural killer T cells into NKT10 cells, increase the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors, inhibit the invasion of hepatitis B virus, promote white adipose tissue browning, improve arterial vascular dynamics, maintain tight junctions between bile duct cells, and protect against apoptosis. In portal hypertension, TGR5 receptor activation can inhibit the contraction of hepatic stellate cells and improve intrahepatic microcirculation. In addition, the discovery of the regulatory relationship between the TGR5 receptor and miRNA-26a provides a new direction for further studies of the molecular mechanism underlying the effects of TGR5. In this review, we describe recent findings linking TGR5 to various liver diseases, with a focus on the mechanisms underlying its effects and potential therapeutic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Dan Tang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Chang Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Lijin Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Setola SV, Avallone A, Palaia R, Grassi R, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Radiological assessment of secondary biliary tree lesions: an update. J Int Med Res 2021; 48:300060519850398. [PMID: 32597280 PMCID: PMC7432986 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519850398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To conduct a systematic literature review of imaging techniques and findings
in patients with peribiliary liver metastasis. Methods Several electronic datasets were searched from January 1990 to June 2017 to
identify studies assessing the use of different imaging techniques for the
detection and staging of peribiliary metastases. Results The search identified 44 studies, of which six met the inclusion criteria and
were included in the systematic review. Multidetector computed tomography
(MDCT) is the technique of choice in the preoperative setting and during the
follow-up of patients with liver tumors. However, the diagnostic performance
of MDCT for the assessment of biliary tree neoplasms was low compared with
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ultrasound (US), without and with contrast
enhancement (CEUS), is commonly employed as a first-line tool for evaluating
focal liver lesions; however, the sensitivity and specificity of US and CEUS
for both the detection and characterization are related to operator
expertise and patient suitability. MRI has thus become the gold standard
technique because of its ability to provide morphologic and functional data.
MRI showed the best diagnostic performance for the detection of peribiliary
metastases. Conclusions MRI should be considered the gold standard technique for the radiological
assessment of secondary biliary tree lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Abdominal Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Palaia
- Abdominal Surgical Oncology Division, Hepatobiliary Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassi
- Radiology Unit, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Abdominal Surgical Oncology Division, Hepatobiliary Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee DH. Current Status and Recent Update of Imaging Evaluation for Peri-Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY 2021; 82:298-314. [PMID: 36238748 PMCID: PMC9431946 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
간문주변부의 해부학적 복잡성으로 인해 간문주변부 담관암은 그 진단과 치료가 어려운 질환으로 알려져 있다. 간문주변부 담관암이 의심되는 환자에 있어서, 영상 검사는 이상 소견의 발견 및 감별 진단, 종양의 종축 침범 부위의 파악, 인접 혈관 침범과 원격 전이 유무의 파악, 그리고 최종적으로 수술적 절제 가능 유무의 평가에 있어 핵심적인 역할을 하고 있다. 이 종설에서는 간문주변부 담관암의 분류 및 종양의 평가를 위해 권고되는 표준 영상 검사의 기법과 간문주변부 담관암의 전형적인 영상 소견에 대해 기술할 예정이다. 종축 방향의 종양 침범 파악, 인접 혈관 침범 및 원격 전이 유무의 평가에 있어서 각 영상 검사 소견과 그 진단능에 대해 논의할 예정이다. 이후 전통적인 절제 가능성 평가의 개념에 대해 고찰하고, 최근의 경향을 소개한다.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee DH, Kim B, Lee ES, Kim HJ, Min JH, Lee JM, Choi MH, Seo N, Choi SH, Kim SH, Lee SS, Park YS, Chung YE. Radiologic Evaluation and Structured Reporting Form for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer: 2019 Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology. Korean J Radiol 2020; 22:41-62. [PMID: 32901457 PMCID: PMC7772383 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiologic imaging is important for evaluating extrahepatic bile duct (EHD) cancers; it is used for staging tumors and evaluating the suitability of surgical resection, as surgery may be contraindicated in some cases regardless of tumor stage. However, the published general recommendations for EHD cancer and recommendations guided by the perspectives of radiologists are limited. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) study group for EHD cancer developed key questions and corresponding recommendations for the radiologic evaluation of EHD cancer and organized them into 4 sections: nomenclature and definition, imaging technique, cancer evaluation, and tumor response. A structured reporting form was also developed to allow the progressive accumulation of standardized data, which will facilitate multicenter studies and contribute more evidence for the development of recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bohyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Sun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyoung Jung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hye Min
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Moon Hyung Choi
- Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nieun Seo
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Hyun Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Soo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yang Shin Park
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Chung
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mostyka M, Birch MM, Samstein B, Pittman ME. Hidden Carcinoma: Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Lymphoepithelioma-Like Cholangiocarcinoma. Int J Surg Pathol 2020; 28:872-878. [PMID: 32429781 DOI: 10.1177/1066896920921560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Lymphoepithelioma-like intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare variant of cholangiocarcinoma that is associated with the Epstein-Barr virus. The intimate relationship between the malignant epithelial cells and the numerous lymphoid cells can make the diagnosis challenging on limited tissue samples. We present 2 cases in which the presence of a dense hematolymphoid infiltrate served to mask the diagnosis of carcinoma on initial frozen section and biopsy review, respectively. We bring awareness to this potential diagnostic pitfall and offer morphologic and immunohistochemical clues that may aid in recognition of this unusual and sometimes perplexing carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Mostyka
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meaghan M Birch
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin Samstein
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meredith E Pittman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lamarca A, Barriuso J, Chander A, McNamara MG, Hubner RA, ÓReilly D, Manoharan P, Valle JW. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ( 18FDG-PET) for patients with biliary tract cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol 2019; 71:115-129. [PMID: 30797051 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) in the diagnosis and staging of patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs) remains controversial, so we aimed to provide robust information on the utility of 18FDG-PET in the diagnosis and management of BTC. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis explored the diagnostic test accuracy of 18FDG-PET as a diagnostic tool for diagnosis of primary tumour, lymph node invasion, distant metastases and relapsed disease. Subgroup analysis by study quality and BTC subtype were performed. Changes in management based on 18FDG-PET and impact of maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) on prognosis were also assessed. A random effects model was used for meta-analyses. RESULTS A total of 2,125 patients were included from 47 eligible studies. The sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of 18FDG-PET for the diagnosis of primary tumour were 91.7% (95% CI 89.8-93.2) and 51.3% (95% CI 46.4-56.2), respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8668. For lymph node invasion, Se was 88.4% (95% CI82.6-92.8) and Sp was 69.1% (95% CI 63.8-74.1); AUC 0.8519. For distant metastases, Se was 85.4% (95% CI 79.5-90.2) and Sp was 89.7% (95% CI86.0-92.7); AUC 0.9253. For relapse, Se was 90.1% (95% CI 84.4-94.3) and Sp was 83.5% (95% CI 74.4-90.4); AUC 0.9592. No diagnostic threshold effect was identified. Meta-regression did not identify significant sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis revealed no change in results when analyses were limited to studies with low risk of bias/concern. The pooled proportion of change in management was 15% (95% CI 11-20); the majority (78%) due to disease upstaging. Baseline high SUVmax was associated with worse survival (pooled hazard ratio of 1.79; 95% CI 1.37-2.33; p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS There is evidence to support the incorporation of 18FDG-PET into the current standard of care for the staging (lymph node and distant metastases) and identification of relapse in patients with BTC to guide treatment selection; especially if the identification of occult sites of disease would change management, or if diagnosis of relapse remains unclear following standard of care imaging. The role for diagnosis of the primary tumour remains controversial due to low sensitivity and 18FDG-PET should not be considered as a replacement for pathological confirmation in this setting. LAY SUMMARY A positron emission tomography (PET scan), using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG), can help doctors identify areas of cancer in the body by highlighting "hot spots". These hotspots may be cancerous (true positive) but may also be non-cancerous, like inflammation (false positive). We show that PET scans are useful to assess how far advanced the cancer is (by assessing spread to lymph glands and to other organs) and also to identify if the cancer has recurred (for example after surgery), thus helping doctors to make treatment decisions. However, a biopsy is still needed for the initial diagnosis of a biliary tract cancer, because of the high chance of a "false positive" with PET scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Lamarca
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
| | - Jorge Barriuso
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Amarjot Chander
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mairéad G McNamara
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Richard A Hubner
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Derek ÓReilly
- HPB Surgery Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Prakash Manoharan
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Juan W Valle
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Forner A, Vidili G, Rengo M, Bujanda L, Ponz-Sarvisé M, Lamarca A. Clinical presentation, diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int 2019; 39 Suppl 1:98-107. [PMID: 30831002 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogeneous group of tumours, derived from cells of the biliary tree, which represent the second most frequent primary liver tumour. According to the most recent classifications, CCA can be subdivided into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA) which include perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) CCA. CCA are usually identified at advanced stages, when the primary tumour grows enough to produce a large liver mass or when jaundice has developed because of biliary tree obstruction. The ongoing challenges in the identification of risk factors and definition of a specific population at higher risk of developing CCA are the main challenges for the development of screening programs. Therefore, late diagnosis remains an unresolved issue in CCA. Imaging plays an important role in the detection and characterization of CCA, helping with radiological diagnosis, guiding biopsy procedures and allowing staging of the tumour. This review focuses on clinical presentations and diagnosis and staging techniques of CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Forner
- Liver Unit, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Group, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gianpaolo Vidili
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Marco Rengo
- Academic Diagnostic Imaging Division - I.C.O.T. Hospital, University of Rome "Sapienza", Latina, Italy
| | - Luis Bujanda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Donostia/Instituto Biodonostia. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd)., Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Mariano Ponz-Sarvisé
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Programa Tumores Solidos y biomarcadrores, CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Angela Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhou H, Xu J, Wang S, Peng J. Role of cantharidin in the activation of IKKα/IκBα/NF‑κB pathway by inhibiting PP2A activity in cholangiocarcinoma cell lines. Mol Med Rep 2018; 17:7672-7682. [PMID: 29620225 PMCID: PMC5983964 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Cantharidin (CAN), a potent inhibitor of serine/threonine‑protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), is widely used in clinical practice, particularly in the treatment of advanced cancer due to its specific action on these types of cancer. In the present study, the inhibitory effect of CAN was examined in two cholangiocarcinoma cell lines (QBC939 and Hucc‑t1). Following treatment with CAN, cell viability was effectively reduced in QBC939 and Hucc‑t1 cells and normal human intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells. However, a slight increase in reactive oxygen species levels in QBC939 cells treated with CAN was observed post‑treatment. CAN significantly inhibited cell migration and invasion in a dose‑dependent manner. Western blot analysis demonstrated that the nuclear factor‑κB (NF‑κB) pathway was stimulated by CAN, which was confirmed by the upregulated phosphorylation levels of inhibitor of NF‑κB kinase subunit α (IKKα) and NF‑κB inhibitor α (IκBα) in cells, and an increased NF‑κB p65 subunit level in the nucleus. The expression levels of 72 kDa type IV collagenase (MMP2) and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) were downregulated by CAN. Notably, there was a negative association between MMP2 and MMP9 expression levels, and NF‑κB p65, although NF‑κB p65 regulates the expression of MMP2 and MMP9 and has a positive association with these proteins in various types of cancer. Notably, it was observed that CAN exerted specific inhibition on PP2A activity and thereby resulted in the activation of the IKKα/IκBα/NF‑κB pathway. Therefore, CAN‑induced cell inhibition maybe partially dependent on the activation of the IKKα/IκBα/NF‑κB pathway. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that CAN selectively and effectively inhibited cholangiocarcinoma cell migration and invasion. The present study may provide a novel insight into the use of CAN as a therapeutic candidate in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huijiang Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, Zhejiang 322000, P.R. China
| | - Jiangfeng Xu
- Department of General Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, Zhejiang 322000, P.R. China
| | - Shuai Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, Zhejiang 322000, P.R. China
| | - Jinfeng Peng
- Department of General Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, Zhejiang 322000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Grazioli L, Ambrosini R, Frittoli B, Grazioli M, Morone M. Primary benign liver lesions. Eur J Radiol 2017; 95:378-398. [PMID: 28987695 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Benign focal liver lesions can origin from all kind of liver cells: hepatocytes, mesenchymal and cholangiocellular line. Their features at imaging may sometimes pose difficulties in differential diagnosis with malignant primary and secondary lesions. In particular, the use of MDCT and MRI with extracellular and hepatobiliary Contrast Agents may non invasively help in correct interpretation and definition of hepatocellular or mesenchymal and inflammatory nature, allowing to choose the best treatment option. The peculiarities of main benign liver lesions at US, CT and MRI are described, with special attention to differential diagnosis and diagnostic clues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Grazioli
- ASST "Spedali Civili", P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | | | - Barbara Frittoli
- ASST "Spedali Civili", P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Marco Grazioli
- ASST "Spedali Civili", P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; University of Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Mario Morone
- ASST "Spedali Civili", P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alexander LF, Harri P, Little B, Moreno CC, Mittal PK. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Primary Hepatic Malignancies in Patients With and Without Chronic Liver Disease: A Pictorial Review. Cureus 2017; 9:e1539. [PMID: 28989828 PMCID: PMC5628780 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary hepatic malignancies are less common than metastatic diseases, but a recognition of these lesions is important for diagnosis and treatment planning. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides the most imaging information to diagnose lesions noninvasively and to narrow differential diagnoses. This paper reviews the imaging findings of chronic liver disease and primary hepatic malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, hepatic angiosarcoma, and primary hepatic lymphoma. Clinical and MRI features are reviewed to improve the readers’ recognition of these tumors, allowing for a narrower differential diagnosis when liver masses are encountered on abdominal imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren F Alexander
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Peter Harri
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Brent Little
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Courtney C Moreno
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Pardeep K Mittal
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Catalano O, Filice S, Avallone A, Piccirillo M, Leongito M, Palaia R, Grassi R, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Uncommon neoplasms of the biliary tract: radiological findings. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20160561. [PMID: 28731820 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report our cancer centre experience in the biliary tumours incidence other than cholangiocellular-carcinoma, emphasizing the radiological features. METHODS 197 patients with biliary disease undergoing Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were reviewed. Four radiologists evaluated retrospectively size, structure, anatomical site and signal intensity of lesions on MRI. Enhancement-pattern during the arterial-, portal- and late-phase on ultrasound, CT and MR study was assessed as well as the enhancement pattern during the hepatobiliary-phase on MRI. RESULTS 23 patients were selected. The lesion was intraductal in 5 cases, periductal in 14 and intrahepatic in 4. 16 lesions were solid, 5 uniloculated cystic and 2 complex cystic. In five patients the lesion was simple cyst, with a signal intensity in T1 weighted (T1W) and T2 weighted (T2W) similar to the gallbladder. In two patients with complex cystic lesion, the solid component was heterogeneously hypointense in T1 W, hyperintense in T2 W with a restricted diffusion. The solid component showed heterogeneous contrast-enhancement on CT, MR and ultrasound. The tumour was intrahepatic in two patients, with signal hypointense in T1 W and hyperintense in T2 W. Diffusion was restricted. The lesions showed heterogeneous contrast-enhancement. The periductal lesions were hypointense in T1 W, hyperintense in T2 W with restricted diffusion. The lesion showed progressive contrast-enhancement. Peribiliary melanoma was hyperintense in T1 W, hyperintense in T2 W with restricted diffusion and progressively contrast-enhanced. CONCLUSION Biliary tumours can have a wide spectrum of radiologic appearances and consequently represent a diagnostic challenge for the radiologist. Advances in knowledge: MRI is the technique of choice in diagnosing biliary tumours, including rare (non-CCC) tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- 1 Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS di Napol, Naples, Italy.,2 Division of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.,3 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, NaplesI, Italy.,4 Division of Radiology, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- 1 Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS di Napol, Naples, Italy.,2 Division of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.,3 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, NaplesI, Italy.,4 Division of Radiology, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy
| | - Orlando Catalano
- 1 Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS di Napol, Naples, Italy.,2 Division of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.,3 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, NaplesI, Italy.,4 Division of Radiology, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Filice
- 1 Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS di Napol, Naples, Italy.,2 Division of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.,3 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, NaplesI, Italy.,4 Division of Radiology, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- 1 Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS di Napol, Naples, Italy.,2 Division of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.,3 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, NaplesI, Italy.,4 Division of Radiology, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy
| | - Mauro Piccirillo
- 1 Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS di Napol, Naples, Italy.,2 Division of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.,3 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, NaplesI, Italy.,4 Division of Radiology, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy
| | - Maddalena Leongito
- 1 Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS di Napol, Naples, Italy.,2 Division of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.,3 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, NaplesI, Italy.,4 Division of Radiology, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Palaia
- 1 Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS di Napol, Naples, Italy.,2 Division of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.,3 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, NaplesI, Italy.,4 Division of Radiology, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassi
- 1 Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS di Napol, Naples, Italy.,2 Division of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.,3 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, NaplesI, Italy.,4 Division of Radiology, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- 1 Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS di Napol, Naples, Italy.,2 Division of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.,3 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, NaplesI, Italy.,4 Division of Radiology, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- 1 Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS di Napol, Naples, Italy.,2 Division of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.,3 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, NaplesI, Italy.,4 Division of Radiology, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance, computed tomography and contrast enhanced ultrasound in radiological multimodality assessment of peribiliary liver metastases. PLoS One 2017. [PMID: 28632786 PMCID: PMC5478136 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We compared diagnostic performance of Magnetic Resonance (MR), Computed Tomography (CT) and Ultrasound (US) with (CEUS) and without contrast medium to identify peribiliary metastasis. METHODS We identified 35 subjects with histological proven peribiliary metastases who underwent CEUS, CT and MR study. Four radiologists evaluated the presence of peribiliary lesions, using a 4-point confidence scale. Echogenicity, density and T1-Weigthed (T1-W), T2-W and Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) signal intensity as well as the enhancement pattern during contrast studies on CEUS, CT and MR so as hepatobiliary-phase on MRI was assessed. RESULTS All lesions were detected by MR. CT detected 8 lesions, while US/CEUS detected one lesion. According to the site of the lesion, respect to the bile duct and hepatic parenchyma: 19 (54.3%) were periductal, 15 (42.8%) were intra-periductal and 1 (2.8%) was periductal-intrahepatic. According to the confidence scale MRI had the best diagnostic performance to assess the lesion. CT obtained lower diagnostic performance. There was no significant difference in MR signal intensity and contrast enhancement among all metastases (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in CT density and contrast enhancement among all metastases (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS MRI is the method of choice for biliary tract tumors but it does not allow a correct differential diagnosis among different histological types of metastasis. The presence of biliary tree dilatation without hepatic lesions on CT and US/CEUS study may be an indirect sign of peribiliary metastases and for this reason the patient should be evaluated by MRI.
Collapse
|
15
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Catalano O, Avallone A, Leongito M, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Peribiliary liver metastases MR findings. Med Oncol 2017; 34:124. [PMID: 28573638 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-0981-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
We described magnetic resonance (MR) features of peribiliary metastasis and of periductal infiltrative cholangiocarcinoma. We assessed 35 patients, with peribiliary lesions, using MR 4-point confidence scale. T1-weighted (T1-W), T2-weighted (T2-W) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) signal intensity, enhancement pattern during arterial, portal, equilibrium and hepatobiliary phase were assessed. We identified 24 patients with periductal-infiltrating cholangiocellular carcinoma. The lesions in 34 patients appeared as a single tissue, while in a single patient, the lesions appeared as multiple individual lesions. According to the confidence scale, the median value was 4 for T2-W, 4 for DWI, 3.6 for T1-W in phase, 3.6 for T1-W out phase, 3 for MRI arterial phase, 3.2 for MRI portal phase, 3.2 for MRI equilibrium phase and 3.6 for MRI hepatobiliary phase. According to Bismuth classification, all lesions were type IV. In total, 19 (54.3%) lesions were periductal, 15 (42.9%) lesions were intraperiductal, and 1 (2.8%) lesion was periductal intrahepatic. All lesions showed hypointense signal in T1-W and in ADC maps and hyperintense signal in T2-W and DWI. All lesions showed a progressive contrast enhancement. There was no significant difference in signal intensity and contrast enhancement among all metastases and among all metastases with respect to CCCs, for all imaging acquisitions (p value >0.05). MRI is the method of choice for biliary tract tumors thanks to the possibility to obtain morphological and functional evaluations. T2-W and DW sequences have highest diagnostic performance. MRI does not allow a correct differential diagnosis among different histological types of metastasis and between metastases and CCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Orlando Catalano
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Abdominal Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Maddalena Leongito
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fang J, Ma X, Yu D, Ma X, Xiang Y, Guo L. Specific imaging characteristic of solitary necrotic nodule of the liver: Marked peripheral rim-like enhancement with internal hypointensity on longer delayed MRI. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:3563-3573. [PMID: 28124105 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4731-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2016] [Revised: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To obtain specific imaging findings of solitary necrotic nodule of the liver (SNNL) using longer delayed contrast-enhanced MRI and compare them with those of three mimic hepatic diseases. METHODS Sixteen patients with SNNL underwent plain and contrast-enhanced triphasic CT and multiphasic MRI with delayed time prolonged to 2 h after contrast bolus injection. Twenty-three patients with mimic lesions including seven with eight HCCs, five with five iCCs and 11 with metastatic lesions served as the control group. Those patients also received plain and multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI. Imaging features of lesions such as peripheral wash-out time were evaluated. RESULTS Among the 16 SNNLs, with a prolonged delayed MRI time, the enhancement degree of tumour periphery increased gradually. When it was up to 1 h, all lesions represented moderate/marked peripheral enhancement with internal hypointensity. However, the peripheral wash-out in seven HCCs (87.5%) and all metastatic lesions except three appeared at 10 or 15 min, one iCC (20%) at 30 min and the other lesions at 1 h. CONCLUSIONS Longer MRI with a delayed time of 1-2 h may be useful in diagnosis SNNL, revealing the specific imaging characteristic of SNNL as pronounced peripheral enhancement with internal hypointensity. KEY POINTS • Longer delayed MRI plays an important role in the diagnosis of SNNL. • Characteristic imaging feature of SNNL is pronounced peripheral enhancement with internal hypointensity. • Periphery wash-out time can differentiate SNNL from mimic diseases. • Imaging findings of SNNL on routine CT and MRI are unspecific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayang Fang
- Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Ji'nan City, Shandong, China, 250012
| | - Xiaoyuan Ma
- Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Ji'nan City, China
| | - Dexin Yu
- Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Ji'nan City, Shandong, China, 250012.
| | - Xiangxing Ma
- Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Ji'nan City, Shandong, China, 250012
| | - Ying Xiang
- Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Ji'nan City, Shandong, China, 250012
| | - Lijuan Guo
- Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Ji'nan City, Shandong, China, 250012
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tsai TH, Hsu JS, Lai ML, Liu GC, Shih MCP, Chen CY. Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of bile duct dilatations. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41:485-92. [PMID: 27039319 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0612-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) when used with conventional T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (T2WI) and MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for diagnosing bile duct dilatations. METHODS Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study protocol and waived the informed consent requirement. The study included 151 consecutive patients (70 men, 81 women) with intra- and/or extra-hepatic bile duct dilatation examined using MR imaging. Two radiologists independently and randomly reviewed 3 image sets (A: MRCP and T2WI; B: DWI; and C: combined T2WI, MRCP, and DWI) at different occasions to differentiate between malignancy, biliary lithiasis, and benign dilatation. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of these imaging sets were calculated and compared. RESULTS For both readers, combined T2WI, MRCP, and DWI exhibited significantly higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for malignant dilatation, compared with conventional T2WI and MRCP (P < 0.01 for both readers). However, DWI did not significantly affect the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for biliary lithiasis or benign dilatation. CONCLUSION The addition of DWI to T2WI and MRCP sequences yields significantly higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy when examining bile duct dilatations, particularly malignant dilatations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu-Hsueh Tsai
- Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100 Tz You 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Jui-Sheng Hsu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100 Tz You 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Lai Lai
- Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100 Tz You 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Gin-Chung Liu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100 Tz You 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chen Paul Shih
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chiao-Yun Chen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100 Tz You 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan. .,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|