Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may distinguish gallbladder adenoma from cholesterol polyps: a prospective case-control study

Preliminary study on diagnosis of gallbladder neoplastic polyps based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and grey scale ultrasound radiomics

Objective

Neoplastic gallbladder polyps (GPs), including adenomas and adenocarcinomas, are considered absolute indications for surgery; however, the distinction of neoplastic from non-neoplastic GPs on imaging is often challenging. This study thereby aimed to develop a CEUS radiomics nomogram, and evaluate the role of a combined grey-scale ultrasound and CEUS model for the prediction and diagnosis of neoplastic GPs.

Methods

Patients with GPs of ≥ 1 cm who underwent CEUS between January 2017 and May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Grey-scale ultrasound and arterial phase CEUS images of the largest section of the GPs were used for radiomics feature extraction. Features with good reproducibility in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient were selected. Grey-scale ultrasound and CEUS Rad-score models were first constructed using the Mann-Whitney U and LASSO regression test, and were subsequently included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis as independent factors for construction of the combined model.

Results

A total of 229 patients were included in our study. Among them, 118 cholesterol polyps, 68 adenomas, 33 adenocarcinomas, 6 adenomyomatoses, and 4 inflammatory polyps were recorded. A total of 851 features were extracted from each patient. Following screening, 21 and 15 features were retained in the grey-scale and CEUS models, respectively. The combined model demonstrated AUCs of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83 - 0.93) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74 - 0.93) in the training and testing set, respectively. When applied to the whole dataset, the combined model detected 111 of the 128 non-neoplastic GPs, decreasing the resection rate of non-neoplastic GPs to 13.3%.

Conclusion

Our proposed combined model based on grey-scale ultrasound and CEUS radiomics features carries the potential as a non-invasive, radiation-free, and reproducible tool for the prediction and identification of neoplastic GPs. Our model may not only guide the treatment selection for GPs, but may also reduce the surgical burden of such patients.

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for biliary tract disease

Conventional ultrasonography (US) for biliary tract disease shows high time and spatial resolution. In addition, it is simple and minimally invasive, and is selected as a first-choice examination procedure for biliary tract disease. Currently, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), which facilitates the more accurate assessment of lesion blood flow in comparison with color and power Doppler US, is performed using a second-generation ultrasonic contrast agent. Such agents are stable and provide a timeline for CEUS diagnosis. Gallbladder lesions are classified into three types: gallbladder biliary lesion (GBL), gallbladder polypoid lesion (GPL), and gallbladder wall thickening (GWT). Bile duct lesions can also be classified into three types: bile duct biliary lesion (BBL), bile duct polypoid lesion (BDPL), and bile duct wall thickening (BDWT). CEUS facilitates the differentiation of GBL/BBL from tumorous lesions based on the presence or absence of blood vessels. In the case of GPL, it is important to identify a vascular stalk attached to the lesion. In the case of GWT, the presence or absence of a non-contrast-enhanced area, the Rokitansky-Aschoff sinus, and continuity of a contrast-enhanced gallbladder wall layer are important for differentiation from gallbladder cancer. In the case of BDWT, it is useful to evaluate the contour of the contrast-enhanced medial layer of the bile duct wall for differentiating IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis. CEUS for ampullary carcinoma accurately reflects histopathological findings of the lesion. Evaluating blood flow in the lesion, continuity of the gallbladder wall, and contour of the bile duct wall via CEUS provides useful information for the diagnosis of biliary tract disease.

What's new in the hot gallbladder: the evolving radiologic diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common condition and its incidence is rising. New technologies have advanced the imaging diagnosis of AC, providing more structural and functional information as well as allowing the radiologist to distinguish AC from mimics and identify complications from both the disease and its management. Dual energy CT aids in detecting gallstones and gallbladder wall enhancement, which helps to diagnose AC and identify its complications. Similarly, contrast-enhanced and non-contrast perfusion ultrasound techniques improve detection of abnormal gallbladder wall enhancement. Advances in MR imaging including hepatobiliary contrast agents aid in characterizing post-cholecystectomy complications such as bile leaks. Newer interventional techniques have also expanded the suite of options for minimally invasive management. Lumen apposing metal stents provide more options for conservative treatment in non-surgical candidates and are compared to a standard percutaneous cholecystostomy. Radiologists should be familiar with these advanced imaging methods and intervention techniques and the value they can bring to the diagnosis and management of AC.

Value of Conventional Ultrasound-based Scoring System in Distinguishing Adenomatous Polyps From Cholesterol Polyps

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Ultrasound has increased the detection of gallbladder polyps, but it has limitations in evaluating the nature of gallbladder polyps, especially the maximum size of 1.0 to 1.5 cm. We assessed the value of ultrasound scoring system based on independent predictive parameters in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps with the maximum size of 1.0 to 1.5 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 163 patients with gallbladder polyps (1.0 to 1.5 cm) who underwent ultrasonography and cholecystectomy. Ultrasound image characteristics were compared between cholesterol polyps and adenomatous polyps in the training cohort from April 2018 to January 2020. An ultrasound scoring system was constructed in the training cohort, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated in the validation cohort from February 2020 to February 2021.

RESULTS

Maximum size, height/width ratio, stone or sludge, vascularity, and hyperechoic spot were significantly different between cholesterol polyps and adenomatous polyps in the training cohort ( P <0.05). The independent predictive parameters for adenomatous polyps were lower height/width ratio, presence of vascularity and absence of hyperechoic spot. The total score was as follows: (height/width ratio, <0.9=4, ≥0.9=0) + (vascularity, present=3, absent=0) + (hyperechoic spot, absent=2, present=0). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasound scoring system ≥5 for diagnosis of adenomatous polyps in the validation cohort were 73.33%, 80.49%, and 78.57%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasound scoring system aids in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps, and effectively decreasing unnecessary cholecystectomy.

Value of prediction model in distinguishing gallbladder adenoma from cholesterol polyp

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gallbladder adenomatous polyp is a pre-cancerous neoplasm, and it is difficult to classify from cholesterol polyps before cholecystectomy. The study aimed to clarify the risk characteristics of gallbladder adenomas and establish a prediction model to differentiate gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyp lesions.

METHODS

From May 2019 to December 2021, the patients underwent cholecystectomy in the Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. According to the permanent pathology test, the patients were divided into adenomas and cholesterol polyps groups. All the included cases received ultrasound equipment examinations before cholecystectomy and their clinical information were completely recorded. Then the patients' baseline characteristics and ultrasound imaging variables were analyzed by logistic regression. Finally, a predictive model for gallbladder adenomas will be established and assessed based on the independent risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 423 cases including 296 cholesterol polyps and 127 gallbladder adenomas were analyzed in detail. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that solitary polyp lesion (OR = 2.954, 95% CI 1.759-4.960, P < 0.001), the maximal diameter of lesions (OR = 1.244, 95% CI 1.169-1.324, P < 0.001), and irregular shape of polyp lesions (OR = 5.549, 95% CI 1.979-15.560, P = 0.001) were the independent predictive factors of gallbladder adenomas. According to the results, regression equation of logit(P) = -3.828 + 1.083*number of gallbladder polyps lesions (GPLs) + 0.218*diameter of GPLs + 1.714*shape of GPLs was established. Area under the curve (AUC) was 0.828 (95% CI 0.782-0.874, P < 0.001). When logit P > 0.204, the sensitivity of estimating adenoma was 79.5%, the specificity of recognizing adenoma was 70.6%, and the whole correct ratio was 73.3%. While the AUC of diameter (10 mm) being a predictive factor in this study was only 0.790 (95% CI 0.741-0.839, P < 0.001). And the sensitivity and specificity of 10 mm as the optimal diagnostic cutoff value to diagnose adenomas were 74.8% and 65.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk factors of solitary polyp lesion, larger diameter, and irregular morphology feature of polyp lesions were significantly related to gallbladder adenomas. And the predictive model established in the study can effectively identify adenomas from cholesterol polyps and help patients to select the optimal treatment protocol.

Management of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations

Gallbladder polyps (also known as polypoid lesions of the gallbladder) are a common incidental finding. The vast majority of gallbladder polyps smaller than 10 mm are not true neoplastic polyps but are benign cholesterol polyps with no inherent risk of malignancy. In addition, recent studies have shown that the overall risk of gallbladder cancer is not increased in patients with small gallbladder polyps, calling into question the rationale for frequent and prolonged follow-up of these common lesions. In 2021, a Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound, or SRU, consensus conference was convened to provide recommendations for the management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps at US. See also the editorial by Sidhu and Rafailidis in this issue.

[Differential diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions by micro-flow imaging]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of micro-flow imaging (MFI) in evaluating blood flow characteristics and differential diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and ultrasound images of 73 patients with gallbladder polypoid lesions, including 24 patients with pathologically confirmed neoplastic polyps (n=24) and 49 with non-neoplastic polyps (n=49). All the patients underwent conventional ultrasound, MFI and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) before cholecystectomy. The blood flow characteristics of the lesions in color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and MFI were compared, and the consistency of the findings by these two modalities with those of CEUS were evaluated by weighted Kappa consistency test. The diagnostic performance of MFI for gallbladder polypoid lesions was assessed.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between MFI and CDFI in the evaluation of blood flow characteristics of gallbladder polypoid lesions (χ2=37.684, P < 0.001). MFI showed better performance than CDFI in displaying the blood flow characteristics of the polyps. The consistency in the findings was 0.118 between CDFI and CEUS and 0.816 between MFI and CEUS. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MFI in distinguishing neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps were 75.00%, 93.88% and 87.67%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MFI has a good consistency with CEUS in displaying the blood flow characteristics of gallbladder polypoid lesions and can accurately distinguish neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps, thus providing new ultrasound diagnostic evidence to support clinical decisions on optimal treatments of gallbladder polypoid lesions.

Longitudinal Ultrasound Assessment of Changes in Size and Number of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps

BACKGROUND. Previous European multisociety guidelines recommend routine follow-up imaging of gallbladder polyps (including polyps < 6 mm in patients without risk factors) and cholecystectomy for polyp size changes of 2 mm or more. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess longitudinal changes in the number and size of gallbladder polyps on serial ultrasound examinations. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients who underwent at least one ultrasound examination between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020 (as part of a hepatocellular carcinoma screening and surveillance program) that showed a gallbladder polyp. Number of polyps and size of largest polyp were recorded based primarily on review of examination reports. Longitudinal changes on serial examinations were summarized. Pathologic findings from cholecystectomy were reviewed. RESULTS. Among 9683 patients, 759 (8%) had at least one ultrasound examination showing a polyp. Of these, 434 patients (248 men, 186 women; mean age, 50.6 years) had multiple examinations (range, 2-19 examinations; mean, 4.8 examinations per patient; mean interval between first and last examinations, 3.6 ± 3.1 [SD] years; maximum interval, 11.0 years). Among these 434 patients, 257 had one polyp, 40 had two polyps, and 137 had more than two polyps. Polyp size was 6 mm or less in 368 patients, 7-9 mm in 52 patients, and 10 mm or more in 14 patients. Number of polyps increased in 9% of patients, decreased in 14%, both increased and decreased on serial examinations in 22%, and showed no change in 55%. Polyp size increased in 10% of patients, decreased in 16%, both increased and decreased on serial examinations in 18%, and showed no change in 56%. In 9% of patients, gallbladder polyps were not detected on follow-up imaging; in 6% of patients, gallbladder polyps were not detected on a follow-up examination but were then detected on later studies. No gallbladder carcinoma was identified in 19 patients who underwent cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION. Gallbladder polyps fluctuate in size, number, and visibility over serial examinations. Using a 2-mm threshold for growth, 10% increased in size. No carcinoma was identified. CLINICAL IMPACT. European multisociety guidelines that propose surveillance of essentially all polyps and a 2-mm size change as the basis for cholecystectomy are likely too conservative for clinical application.

Conventional Ultrasound Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differential Diagnosis of Gallbladder Cholesterol and Adenomatous Polyps (1-2 cm)

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine ultrasonic image characteristics that enable differentiation between cholesterol and adenomatous polyps and to assess the diagnostic efficacy of combining conventional ultrasound (CUS) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with gallbladder polyps of 1-2 cm in diameter were enrolled and examined by CUS and CEUS before cholecystectomy. The appearances on CUS and CEUS were recorded and analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the optimal size threshold for distinguishing cholesterol from adenomatous polyps. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify diagnostic variables. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the size, the independent variables, and the combined factors.

RESULTS

There were differences in size, number, vascularity on CUS and intralesional vascular shape, wash-out, and area under the curve on CEUS between the two groups (P < .05). ROC analysis indicated that a maximum diameter of 1.45 cm was the optimal threshold for the prediction of adenomatous polyps. The logistic regression analysis proved that the single polyp, presence of vascularity, and intralesional linear vessels were associated with adenomatous polyps (P < .05). ROC analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity for the combination of the three independent variables were 0.858, 87.3%, and 67.6%. The number combined with intralesional vascular shape had the highest diagnostic sensitivity of 91.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CUS and CEUS demonstrated great significance in the differential diagnosis of cholesterol and adenomatous polyps.

Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE

Abstract

Main recommendations

Primary investigation of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder should be with abdominal ultrasound. Routine use of other imaging modalities is not recommended presently, but further research is needed. In centres with appropriate expertise and resources, alternative imaging modalities (such as contrast-enhanced and endoscopic ultrasound) may be useful to aid decision-making in difficult cases. Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence.

Cholecystectomy is recommended in patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder measuring 10 mm or more, providing the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to assess perceived individual risk of malignancy. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence.

Cholecystectomy is suggested for patients with a polypoid lesion and symptoms potentially attributable to the gallbladder if no alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms is demonstrated and the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. The patient should be counselled regarding the benefit of cholecystectomy versus the risk of persistent symptoms. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence.

If the patient has a 6–9 mm polypoid lesion of the gallbladder and one or more risk factors for malignancy, cholecystectomy is recommended if the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. These risk factors are as follows: age more than 60 years, history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), Asian ethnicity, sessile polypoid lesion (including focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm). Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence.

If the patient has either no risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 6–9 mm, or risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion 5 mm or less, follow-up ultrasound of the gallbladder is recommended at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Follow-up should be discontinued after 2 years in the absence of growth. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.

If the patient has no risk factors for malignancy, and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 5 mm or less, follow-up is not required. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.

If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion grows to 10 mm, then cholecystectomy is advised. If the polypoid lesion grows by 2 mm or more within the 2-year follow-up period, then the current size of the polypoid lesion should be considered along with patient risk factors. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to decide whether continuation of monitoring, or cholecystectomy, is necessary. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.

If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion disappears, then monitoring can be discontinued. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.

Source and scope

These guidelines are an update of the 2017 recommendations developed between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery–European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A targeted literature search was performed to discover recent evidence concerning the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. The changes within these updated guidelines were formulated after consideration of the latest evidence by a group of international experts. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.

Key Point

• These recommendations update the 2017 European guidelines regarding the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps.

Value of high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound in distinguishing gallbladder adenoma from cholesterol polyp lesion

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic value of high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (H-CEUS) in distinguishing gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyp lesions with that of CEUS.

METHODS

This study enrolled 94 patients with gallbladder polyp lesions (GPLs) who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. CEUS and H-CEUS were performed before surgery. The perfusion features of GPLs and the final diagnosis as determined by both technologies were compared.

RESULTS

There were differences in vascular types between gallbladder adenomas and cholesterol polyp lesions observed on H-CEUS (p < 0.05), while there were no differences in vascular types between gallbladder adenomas and cholesterol polyp lesions observed on CEUS (p > 0.05). In the cholesterol polyp lesion group, there were no differences in vascular types between CEUS and H-CEUS (p > 0.05), while the vascular types were different between CEUS and H-CEUS in the gallbladder adenoma group (p < 0.05). The diagnostic value of H-CEUS in distinguishing gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyp lesions was better than that of CEUS.

CONCLUSIONS

H-CEUS improved the time resolution by increasing the frame rate, which helped to accurately reflect the difference in the microcirculation of GPLs and improved the ability of a differential diagnosis between cholesterol polyp lesions and adenomas. H-CUES may provide an effective means of imaging for patients with GPLs regarding the choice of treatment options.

KEY POINTS

• High frame rate CEUS improves the time resolution of CEUS by increasing the frame rate. • High frame rate CEUS is helpful to accurately evaluate the microvascular morphology of a gallbladder polyp lesion in the arterial phase. • High frame rate CEUS helps patients with gallbladder polyp lesions to choose the appropriate treatment means.

Is Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Superior to Computed Tomography for Differential Diagnosis of Gallbladder Polyps? A Cross-Sectional Study

Objective

To compare the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) versus computed tomography (CT) for distinguishing neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps. Given whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy is needed, differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps is more important than benign and malignant polyps.

Methods

A total of 89 consecutive patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder > 10 mm in size without local invasion or distant metastasis during primary screening were enrolled in this prospective and comparative study. All patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent CEUS and CT examinations prior to surgical resection. The enhancement patterns and microvascular imaging types were analyzed on CEUS. The maximum diameter and CT value of the lesions were also recorded and subjected to a comparative analysis. The clinical value of the two diagnostic methods is compared.

Results

Of the 89 patients, there were 58 (65.2%) cases of non-neoplastic polyps and 31 (34.8%) cases of neoplastic polyps. The average diameter of neoplastic polyps was significantly higher than that of non-neoplastic polyps (P<0.001). The detection rate using CEUS was 100%. The proportion of perceived non-neoplastic polyps in the nonenhanced and arterial phases were 48.3% and 77.6%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of neoplastic polyps (93.5%, P<0.001 and 100.0%, P<0.001, respectively). However, in the venous and delayed phases, all cholesterol polyps and neoplastic polyps were perceived. CT showed that non-neoplastic polyps exhibited delayed enhancement. On CEUS 29.0% neoplastic polyps showed a perfusion defect, whereas 6.9% non-neoplastic polyps showed a perfusion defect (P=0.005). The microvascular architecture of the lesions on CEUS was categorized into 4 types: spotty, linear, branched, and spinous, and there were significant differences between the two groups (P<0.001). The sensitivities and specificities were 87.10% and 68.97% for CEUS and 83.87% and 77.59% for CT, respectively (P=0.406).

Conclusions

CEUS and CT are useful for differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. Diagnostic efficacy was comparable between CEUS and CT. Thus, CEUS is preferred over CT in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps due to its comparable diagnostic efficacy and lack of radiation dose.

How Can We Manage Gallbladder Lesions by Transabdominal Ultrasound?

The most important role of ultrasound (US) in the management of gallbladder (GB) lesions is to detect lesions earlier and differentiate them from GB carcinoma (GBC). To avoid overlooking lesions, postural changes and high-frequency transducers with magnified images should be employed. GB lesions are divided into polypoid lesions (GPLs) and wall thickening (GWT). For GPLs, classification into pedunculated and sessile types should be done first. This classification is useful not only for the differential diagnosis but also for the depth diagnosis, as pedunculated carcinomas are confined to the mucosa. Both rapid GB wall blood flow (GWBF) and the irregularity of color signal patterns on Doppler imaging, and heterogeneous enhancement in the venous phase on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) suggest GBC. Since GWT occurs in various conditions, subdividing into diffuse and focal forms is important. Unlike diffuse GWT, focal GWT is specific for GB and has a higher incidence of GBC. The discontinuity and irregularity of the innermost hyperechoic layer and irregular or disrupted GB wall layer structure suggest GBC. Rapid GWBF is also useful for the diagnosis of wall-thickened type GBC and pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Detailed B-mode evaluation using high-frequency transducers, combined with Doppler imaging and CEUS, enables a more accurate diagnosis.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound to assess gallbladder polyps

PURPOSE

To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in distinguishing adenomatous gallbladder polyps from cholesterol gallbladder polyps.

METHODS

A total of 164 patients with gallbladder polyps were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent B-mode ultrasound (US) and CEUS before cholecystectomy. Gallbladder polyps were divided into cholesterol polyp group and adenomatous polyp group according to pathology. Differences in patient's age, gender, maximum polyp size, number, presence of gallstones, vascularity and stalk width measured by US and vascular stalk width measured by CEUS were tested between the two groups. The diagnostic performance of specific US features was evaluated. The independent factors related with adenomatous polyps were analyzed by multiple logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

There were 114 cholesterol polyps and 50 adenomatous polyps in 164 patients analyzed in the study. Differences in maximum size, vascularity, and stalk width of the gallbladder polyp were significant between the two groups (p < 0.05), whereas differences in patient's age, gender, number of gallbladder polyp, and presence of gallstones between the two groups were not (p > 0.05). Stalk width was wider than vascular stalk width between the two groups (p < 0.05). Vascular stalk width was also statistically different between the two groups (p < 0.05). The diagnostic performance of vascular stalk width was more significant than stalk width. Only vascular stalk width and vascularity were independent factors related with adenomatous polyps.

CONCLUSION

Vascular stalk width measured by CEUS is more accurate than stalk width measured by grayscale US in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps.

Is contrast enhanced ultrasonography an accurate way to diagnose gallbladder adenoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Gallbladder adenoma (GA) is a precancerous neoplasm and needs surgical resection. It is difficult to differentiate adenoma from other gallbladder polyps using imaging examinations. The aim of present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of gallbladder adenoma.

METHODS

The searches were conducted by two independent researchers to find the relevant studies published from 1/1/2009 until end of 30/06/2019. The search included published literature in the English language in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE via Ovid, The Cochrane Library, and Trip databases. For literature published in other languages, national databases (Magiran and SID), KoreaMed, and LILACS were searched. The risk of bias of every article was evaluated by using QUADAS-2. On the basis of the results from the 2 × 2 tables, pooled measures for sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curves (AUC) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the DerSimonian Lair methodology.

RESULTS

Overall, 868 patients were studied in the 10 studies chosen for inclusion. Of these 10 studies, 5 (50%) were retrospective and 5 (50%) were prospective. The total prevalence of gallbladder adenoma in 10 studies was 16% (95% CI 13%, 18%). The sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound were 0.846 (95% CI 0.818-0.871) and 0.870 (95% CI: 0.844-0.894), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 40.807 (95% CI 18.838-88.393).

CONCLUSION

CEUS is a reliable, non-invasive, and no-radiation-exposure imaging modality with a high sensitivity and specificity for detection of gallbladder adenoma. Nonetheless, it should be applied cautiously, and large scale, well-designed trials are necessary to assess its clinical value.

Differential diagnosis of focal gallbladder lesions: The added value of contrast enhanced ultrasound with liner transducers

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To evaluate the benefits of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with high frequency transducers in characterization of focal gallbladder lesions (FGL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2017 to April 2019, 59 FGL detected by B mode ultrasound (BMUS) were examined, first with the low frequency convex transducer (1-5 MHz) and afterwards with high frequency transducer (7.5-12 MHz). High frequency dynamic CEUS were applied after bolus injection of 4.8 ml Sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles (SonoVue®, Milan). The BMUS and CEUS imaging features were recorded and compared. All lesions were confirmed by surgical resection and histopathologic results.

RESULTS

The final diagnoses of 59 FGL included gallbladder adenocarcinoma (n = 15), gallbladder polyps (n = 11), gallbladder adenomas (n = 18), focal adenomyomatosis (n = 9), and gallbladder Ascariasis debris (n = 6). The mean diameter of FGL was 24.5±11.4 mm, and mean depth to the abdominal wall was 21.2±7.3 mm. While applying CEUS with high frequency transducer, specific diagnostic features, including arterial phase irregular intralesional vascularity (10/15, 66.7%), late phase hypoenhancement (12/15, 80%), destruction of gallbladder wall (8/15, 53.3%), infiltration to the adjacent liver (6/15, 40.0%) were significantly higher in malignant FGL. The overall sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for the correct characterization of malignant FGL were significantly improved by CEUS with high frequency transducer (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 88.5%, accuracy 100%).

CONCLUSION

With its superior contrast resolution, CEUS performed with high frequency transducers is helpful to achieve better visualization of gallbladder fundus and make differential diagnosis of gallbladder lesions, which might greatly improve diagnostic confidence between malignant and benign FGL.

Benign gallbladder diseases: Imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gallbladder diseases

Benign gallbladder diseases usually present with intraluminal lesions and localized or diffuse wall thickening. Intraluminal lesions of the gallbladder include gallstones, cholesterol polyps, adenomas, or sludge and polypoid type of gallbladder cancer must subsequently be excluded. Polyp size, stalk width, and enhancement intensity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and degree of diffusion restriction may help differentiate cholesterol polyps and adenomas from gallbladder cancer. Localized gallbladder wall thickening is largely due to segmental or focal gallbladder adenomyomatosis, although infiltrative cancer may present similarly. Identification of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses is pivotal in diagnosing adenomyomatosis. The layered pattern, degree of enhancement, and integrity of the wall are imaging clues that help discriminate innocuous thickening from gallbladder cancer. High-resolution ultrasound is especially useful for analyzing the layering of gallbladder wall. A diffusely thickened wall is frequently seen in inflammatory processes of the gallbladder. Nevertheless, it is important to check for coexistent cancer in instances of acute cholecystitis. Ultrasound used alone is limited in evaluating complicated cholecystitis and often requires complementary computed tomography. In chronic cholecystitis, preservation of a two-layered wall and weak wall enhancement are diagnostic clues for excluding malignancy. Magnetic resonance imaging in conjunction with diffusion-weighted imaging helps to differentiate xathogranulomatous cholecystitis from gallbladder cancer by identifying the presence of fat and degree of diffusion restriction. Such distinctions require a familiarity with typical imaging features of various gallbladder diseases and an understanding of the roles that assorted imaging modalities play in gallbladder evaluations.

The management of gallbladder polyps

Neoplastic gallbladder polyps (NGP) are rare; the prevalence in the overall population is less than 10%. NGP are associated with a risk of malignant degeneration and must be distinguished from other benign gallbladder polypoid lesions that occur more frequently. NGP are adenomas and the main risk associated with their management is to fail to detect their progression to gallbladder cancer, which is associated with a particular poor prognosis. The conclusions of the recent European recommendations have a low level of evidence, based essentially on retrospective small-volume studies. Abdominal sonography is the first line study for diagnosis and follow-up for NGP. To prevent the onset of gallbladder cancer, or treat malignant degeneration in its early phases, all NGP larger than 10mm, or symptomatic, or larger than 6mm with associated risk factors for cancer (age over 50, sessile polyp, Indian ethnicity, or patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis) are indications for cholecystectomy. Apart from these situations, simple sonographic surveillance is recommended for at least five years; if the NGP increases in size by more than 2mm in size, cholecystectomy is indicated. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is possible but if the surgeon feels that the risk of intra-operative gallbladder perforation is high, conversion to laparotomy should be preferred to avoid potential intra-abdominal tumoral dissemination. When malignant NGP is suspected (size greater than 15mm, signs of locoregional extension on imaging), a comprehensive imaging workup should be performed to search for liver extension: in this setting, radical surgery should be considered.

Clinical relevance of gallbladder polyps; is cholecystectomy always necessary?

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder polyps are common incidental findings during abdominal ultrasonography. Cholecystectomy is recommended for polyps equal or greater than 10 mm on ultrasound due to their malignant potential. However, the majority of lesions appear to be pseudopolyps with no malignant potential. Our aim was to determine the correlation between ultrasonographic findings and histopathological findings after cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyps in two institutions.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was performed at two Dutch institutions of patients who underwent cholecystectomy. All cholecystectomies for suspected gallbladder polyps between January 2010 and August 2017 were included. Ultrasonographic and histopathological reports were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients underwent cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyps. At abdominal ultrasound sixty-five patients (60.2%) were diagnosed with multiple gallbladder polyps. The mean diameter of the polyps was 11 mm. On pathological examination after cholecystectomy, only three specimens harbored true polyps. No anomalies were found in 48 (44%) patients and 51 (47%) had cholesterolosis.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of true gallbladder polyps was much lower in this study than reported in literature. After cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyps diagnosed by ultrasound, 97% of patients had non-neoplastic or not identifiable lesions in the gallbladder. These findings question the usefulness of current guidelines for management of suspected gallbladder polyps.

Prevalence and Sonographic Detection of Gallbladder Polyps in a Western European Population

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer is rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality necessitating the early identification of premalignant and malignant lesions to improve overall prognosis. Despite limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound (US) in the detection of gallbladder polyps, it plays a key role in current European guidelines. The aim of this study was to investigate gallbladder polyp prevalence in a western European population and assess the diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal US.

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent cholecystectomy for US detected gallbladder polypoid lesions at four hospitals in Ireland and the United Kingdom between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively collected. Patient demographics, ultrasonographic, and histopathologic findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients underwent cholecystectomy for US-detected gallbladder polyps. After histopathologic examination, pseudopolyps were found in 75 (56%) specimens with dysplastic or malignant polyps seen in only six (4.5%) specimens. Mean size for neoplastic polyps was 33 mm. The positive predictive value for US in detecting neoplastic polyps in this study was 4.5%, which is significantly lower than the 10%-15% reported previously.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the prevalence of neoplastic polyps in this study is higher than in the previous literature, the distribution of pseudopolyps and true polyps is as expected. With all malignant polyps being >10 mm in diameter, these findings support the current size thresholds stated in European guidelines. The poor diagnostic accuracy of US demonstrated may have led to significant number of patients undergoing unnecessary surgical intervention, further supporting the argument for improved strategies for the investigation of gallbladder polyps.

Computer-aided diagnosis of gallbladder polyps based on high resolution ultrasonography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Gallbladder polyp is a common disease with an overall population prevalence between 4 and 7%. It can be classified as neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. Surgical treatment is necessary for neoplastic polyps. Due to its easy accessibility and nonradioactive, ultrasonography is the mostly used preoperative diagnosis tool for gallbladder polyps. However, human image analysis depends greatly on levels of experience, which results in many overtreatment cases and undertreatment cases in clinics.

METHODS

In this study, we proposed an ultrasound image segmentation algorithm, combined with principal components analysis (PCA) and AdaBoost algorithms to construct a computer-aided diagnosis system for the differentiate diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps.

RESULTS

The proposed segmentation method achieved a high accuracy of 95% for outlining the gallbladder region. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity for the proposed computer-aided diagnosis system based on the segmented images are 87.54%, 86.52% and 89.40%, compared to 69.05%, 67.86% and 70.17% with convolutional neural network. The diagnosis result is also slightly higher than the human eyes of sonologists (86.22%, 85.19% and 89.18% as an average of four sonologists), while with a much faster diagnosis speed (0.02s vs 3s).

CONCLUSIONS

We proposed an efficient ultrasound image segmentation approach and a reliable system of automatic diagonals of neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps. The results show that the diagnosis accuracy is competitive to the expert sonologists while requires much less diagnosis time.

Quantitative contrast-enhanced US helps differentiating neoplastic vs non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps

OBJECTIVES

To differentiate between large (≥ 1 cm in diameter) gallbladder (GB) non-neoplastic and neoplastic polyps using quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) findings.

METHODS

From September 2017 to May 2018, 29 patients (10 males; median age, 63 years) with GB polyps of ≥ 1 cm in diameter who were undergoing cholecystectomy were consecutively enrolled. All patients underwent preoperative conventional US and CEUS examinations. Quantitative analysis of CEUS findings using time-intensity curves between the two groups was independently performed by two radiologists. The interobserver agreement for the quantitative analysis of the CEUS results was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS examination.

RESULTS

After the cholecystectomy, the patients were classified into the non-neoplastic polyp group (n = 12) and the neoplastic polyp group (n = 17) according to the pathological results. The interobserver agreement for quantitative assessment between the two radiologists was near perfect to substantial. Quantitative assessment of the CEUS findings revealed that the rise time, mean transit time, time to peak, and fall time of non-neoplastic GB polyps were significantly shorter than those of neoplastic polyps (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, p = 0.013, and p = 0.002, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of the quantitative CEUS parameters for the differentiation between the two groups were 76.5-100% and 75%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.765-0.887.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative analysis of CEUS findings could be valuable in differentiating GB neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps.

KEY POINTS

• Quantitative analysis of CEUS findings could be valuable in differentiating gallbladder neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps. • Quantitative analysis of CEUS findings in gallbladder polyps provides cut-off values for differentiation between neoplastic polyps and non-neoplastic polyps with near-perfect to substantial interobserver agreement.

Uncommon Intraluminal Tumors of the Gallbladder and Biliary Tract: Spectrum of Imaging Appearances

Intraluminal pathologic conditions of the bile ducts and gallbladder are common, most frequently consisting of calculi and adenocarcinoma. In recent years, intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts (IPN-B), which is analogous to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, has been recognized as a distinct pathologic entity and a precursor lesion to adenocarcinoma of the bile ducts. Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the bile duct was subsequently described as a distinct pathologic entity. With increased awareness and advances in imaging techniques, these lesions are diagnosed with increased frequency at preoperative imaging. A similar neoplasm in the gallbladder is referred to as intracholecystic papillary neoplasm. These lesions are often diagnosed at a preinvasive stage and have a better prognosis than invasive cholangiocarcinoma when treated with curative resection, underscoring the importance of an accurate imaging diagnosis. The most common causes of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder are cholesterol polyps and adenomyomatosis. These lesions need to be differentiated from the less common but clinically important adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder. Imaging is crucial to identify polyps that are at high risk for malignancy so that the appropriate management choice between imaging follow-up and cholecystectomy can be made by the treating physicians. Other less common gallbladder tumors, such as gallbladder adenomas, lymphoma, and metastases to the gallbladder, can manifest as intraluminal tumors; and awareness of these lesions is also important. In this article, the recent literature is reviewed; and the imaging appearances, histopathologic findings, and management of uncommon intraluminal tumors of the bile ducts and gallbladder and their mimics are discussed. ^©RSNA, 2019.

[Radiologic diagnosis of the gallbladder and bile ducts - part 2 : Acute and chronic cholecystitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), benign and malignant masses of the biliary system]

Upper abdominal pain, icterus and cholestasis are the symptoms leading to evaluation of the biliary tract. Together with its complications biliary stone disease is the main reason for inflammation of the biliary system. A distinction is made between acute and chronic variants. In chronic bile duct inflammation primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and more recently IgG4-associated sclerosing cholangitis are of particular importance. Besides benign and tumor-like-lesions, malignant entities as gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) in its three locations have to be mentioned. Despite all recent improvements, specificity of bile-tract imaging still remains limited, especially regarding malignant masses. Therefore the final diagnosis is made in many cases by histological analysis.

A Case of Tubular Adenoma of Gallbladder Diagnosed Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been used to diagnose gallbladder (GB) diseases for recent years because it is sensitive to visualize vascularity. Herein, we report a case who had a 1.7 cm × 1.2 cm polypoid lesion located in the gallbladder fundus with a feeding artery located in the stalk. On CEUS, the lesion showed early arterial phase enhancement (time to peak enhancement 18 s), persisting throughout the venous and delay phases. This enhancing pattern suggested that the lesion was a GB adenoma rather than a GB carcinoma. Cholecystectomy was performed, and pathology of the tissue revealed tubular adenoma of the GB.

The efficacy of real-time colour Doppler flow imaging on endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the usefulness of real-time colour Doppler flow (CDF) endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for differentiating neoplastic gallbladder (GB) polyps from non-neoplastic polyps.

METHODS

Between August 2014 and December 2016, a total of 233 patients with GB polyps who underwent real-time CDF-EUS were consecutively enrolled in this prospective study. CDF imaging was subjectively categorized for each patient as: strong CDF pattern, weak CDF pattern and no CDF pattern.

RESULTS

Of the 233 patients, 115 underwent surgical resection. Of these, there were 90 cases of non-neoplastic GB polyps and 23 cases of neoplastic GB polyps. In a multivariate analysis, a strong CDF pattern was the most significant predictive factor for neoplastic polyps; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 52.2 %, 79.4 %, 38.7 %, 86.9 % and 73.9 %, respectively. Solitary polyp and polyp size were associated with an increased risk of neoplasm.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a strong CDF pattern as well as solitary and larger polyps on EUS may be predictive of neoplastic GB polyps. As real-time CDF-EUS poses no danger to the patient and requires no additional equipment, it is likely to become a supplemental tool for the differential diagnosis of GB polyps.

KEY POINTS

• Differential diagnosis between neoplastic polyps and non-neoplastic polyps of GB is limited. • The use of real-time CDF-EUS was convenient, with high agreement between operators. • The real-time CDF-EUS is helpful in differential diagnosis of GB polyps.

Gallbladder polypoid lesions >15mm as indicators of T1b gallbladder cancer risk

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Gallbladder polyps (GBPs) are found in 5-7% of the adult population. However, it is very important to differentiate between benign and malignant polyps to establish an appropriate treatment. The present study aimed to determine the relevance of the 10-mm size criterion and attempted to determine the cut-off diameter of T1b tumours, which requires additional surgical intervention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cases with GBPs were collected between January 2005 and January 2015. A total of 109 patients were enroled retrospectively. Information on age, sex, ultrasound findings, and blood laboratory tests was reviewed. The 10-mm criterion and T1b tumours were examined.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine females and 40 males were included in the study. Patient age was 45±10.7years (range 27-70years). The 10-mm cut-off sensitivity and specificity for predicting malignant polyps was 93.6% and 85.2%, respectively. Fifteen patients had malignant pathologic results, and one patient had GBP <10mm (intraepithelial, 8mm). Two patients had intraepithelial tumours of 12 and 13mm. Twelve malignant patients had T1b tumours with polyp sizes >15mm.

CONCLUSION

Gallbladder cancer may occur in polyps of <10mm. Larger size and older age were predictors of neoplastic GBPs. We suggest 15mm as the optimal cut-off point to predict T1b cancer.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in gallbladder disease: a pictorial review

With its excellent contrast and spatial resolution, and the ability to image in real-time, ultrasound is the main imaging modality for assessing the gallbladder (GB). The application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the GB is now increasingly recognized as a useful addition to ultrasound and other cross-sectional imaging in the assessment of neoplastic and non-neoplastic GB disease. With the ability to image microcirculation and optimal contrast resolution, CEUS allows high-quality delineation in real-time, allowing for increased diagnostic confidence. In addition, ultrasound contrast agents have a favorable safety profile and can be used if CT or MR contrast agents are contraindicated or undesired. In this review, the CEUS appearances of a range of GB diseases encountered are presented, including adenomyomatosis, polyps, carcinoma, sludge, and cholecystitis with mural ulceration or perforation.