Imaging and clinical findings in segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM)

Segmental arterial mediolysis after fenestrated endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair-A rare complication

Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a rare, noninflammatory, nonatherosclerotic condition that occurs commonly in mesenteric vessels. There are no known predisposing risk factors to the development of SAM. We present a case of a 67-year-old woman who presented with abdominal pain 2 days following discharge after an elective endovascular abdominal aortic intervention. Repeat imaging 2 days after readmission showed the presence of multiple new aneurysms involving the mesenteric vasculature. She underwent attempted endovascular embolization of the largest aneurysm. The postmortem and histopathologic examinations confirmed the diagnosis of SAM.

Imaging of Visceral Vessels

The visceral vasculature is inextricably intertwined with abdominopelvic disease staging, spread, and management in routine and emergent cases. Comprehensive evaluation requires specialized imaging techniques for abnormality detection and characterization. Vascular pathology is often encountered on nondedicated routine imaging examinations, which may obscure, mimic, or confound many vascular diagnoses. This review highlights normal arterial, portal venous, and systemic venous anatomy and clinically relevant variants; diagnostic pitfalls related to image-acquisition technique and disease mimics; and characteristics of common and rare vascular diseases to empower radiologists to confidently interpret the vascular findings and avoid misdiagnosis.

A review of histopathologic and radiologic features of non-atherosclerotic pathologies of the extracranial carotid arteries

Diseases of the carotid arteries can be classified into different categories based on their origin. Atherosclerotic carotid disease remains the most encountered arterial wall pathology. However, other less-common non-atherosclerotic diseases can have detrimental clinical consequences if not appropriately recognized. The underlying histological features of each disease process may result in imaging findings that possess features that are obvious of the disease. However, some carotid disease processes may have histological characteristics that manifest as non-specific radiologic findings. The purpose of this manuscript is to review various non-atherosclerotic causes of carotid artery disease as well as their histologic-radiologic characteristics to aid in the appropriate recognition of these less-commonly encountered pathologies.

Differentiating between segmental arterial mediolysis and other arterial vasculopathies to establish an early diagnosis - a systematic literature review and proposal of new diagnostic criteria

Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a rare vascular disease, characterized by acute but transient vulnerability of the wall of medium-sized arteries. The most characteristic feature of SAM is its biphasic course: an injurious phase marked by acute weakness of the arterial wall leading to acute dissection and/or hemorrhage, followed by a reparative phase in which granulation tissue and fibrosis restore the injured arterial wall. Residual stenosis, aneurysms, and/or arterial wall irregularities may remain visible on future imaging studies. Differentiating between SAM and other arterial vasculopathies is difficult due to its similarities with many other vascular diseases, such as vasculitis, fibromuscular dysplasia, inherited connective tissue disorders, and isolated visceral artery dissection. In this systematic review, we provide an overview on SAM, with an emphasis on the differential diagnosis and diagnostic work-up. We propose new diagnostic criteria to help establish a prompt diagnosis of SAM, illustrated by case examples from our multidisciplinary vascular clinic.

Rheumatic masqueraders: mimics of primary vasculitis - a case-based review

INTRODUCTION

Vasculitis conditions are often serious and sometimes fatal diseases, therefore it is paramount to diagnose correctly and treat appropriately. Mimics of primary vasculitis can include either non-inflammatory syndromes or secondary vasculitis where the underlying etiology of the vasculitis is being driven by infection, malignancy, drug-effect or other.

AREAS COVERED

This review comprises six individual cases of vasculitis mimics. Each case is presented and the clinical, radiographic, and histological features that distinguish the case from primary vasculitis are highlighted. Key mimics in large, medium and small vessel vasculitis are outlined.

EXPERT OPINION

The diagnosis of vasculitis requires a comprehensive assessment of clinical, radiographic, and histologic features. Clinicians should be familiar with mimics of primary vasculitis conditions. In the case of non-inflammatory mimics, it is important to differentiate from primary vasculitides in order to avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful immunosuppression. For cases of secondary vasculitis, identification of the correct etiologic cause is critical because treatment of the underlying stimulus is necessary for successful management and outcomes.

Transarterial embolization for ruptured pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm due to segmental arterial mediolysis combined with median arcuate ligament syndrome: a case report

A 75-year-old female with a history of Parkinson's disease treatment and hypertension presented at the emergency section with sudden onset of right abdominal pain. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed beaded irregular stenosis and dilation of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and an aneurysm in the branch of the pancreaticoduodenal artery (PDA) that communicates with the common hepatic artery and SMA. Additionally, a hematoma had formed in the retroperitoneal space, and extravasation of contrast medium from the pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm (PDAA) into the hematoma was observed. The celiac artery (CA) was compressed by the median arcuate ligament; stenosis of the CA at its origin and dilation on the distal side were observed. Based on the imaging findings, it was diagnosed that PDAA was ruptured, SMA developed segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM), and CA developed median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS). The ruptured PDAA was thought to be caused by SAM combined with MALS. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) was performed for the ruptured PDAA. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of TAE for a ruptured PDAA caused by SAM and MALS. After TAE, the PDAA did not re-rupture.

Hepatic segmental arterial mediolysis: A case report and brief literature review

Key Clinical message

When evaluating patients with abdominal pain, it is important to consider SAM in the differential diagnosis, along with vasculitis, fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), atherosclerosis, mycotic aneurysms, and cystic medial degeneration.

Abstract

Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a rare arteriopathy which is an under-recognized and commonly missed diagnosis of abdominal pain. We report a case of a 58-year-old female who presented with abdominal pain and was misdiagnosed with a urinary tract infection. The diagnosis was made with CTA and managed with embolization. Despite appropriate intervention and close hospital monitoring, further complications were inevitable. We conclude that though literature has shown better prognosis and even complete resolution after medical and/or surgical intervention, close follow up and monitoring is needed to avoid unexpected complications.

Mesenteric Artery Dissection and Wall-Thickening, Case Study and General Review

Mesenteric artery dissection (D) and wall-thickening (WT) are rare vasculopathies that can lead to serious complications. This is a single center analysis of all patients evaluated for mesenteric arterial (celiac, superior (SMA) and/or inferior mesenteric (IMA)) D and/or WT from January 1, 2000, to January 31, 2020 at our hospital. Among the 101 included patients, the average age was 55.6 ± 13.6 years, mostly affecting men (62%). There were 20 celiac artery D, 8 WT, 15 D with WT, 15 SMA D, 7 WT, 8 D with WT, one IMA D, two WT, and 25 with multiple arterial involvement. Primary etiologies included segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) (n = 17), isolated D (n = 17), localized vasculitis of the gastrointestinal tract (LVGT) (n = 16), fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) (n = 13), extension of thoracoabdominal aortic D (n = 12), and trauma (n = 12). Most (71%) patients presented with abdominal pain. Hypertension (55%), hyperlipidemia (33%) and tobacco use (31%) were prevalent. Management included conservative (22%), medical (47%), endovascular (19%), and/or open repair (12%) with high in-hospital survival (98%) and symptom relief (73%). Our paper complements the scarce literature addressing the diagnosis and management of rare mesenteric vasculopathies. Most patients improved with conservative management, reserving endovascular or surgical interventions for symptomatic patients with more complicated presentations.

Value of second opinion subspecialty radiology consultation in suspected abdominal medium vessel vasculitis

PURPOSE

To perform a descriptive analysis of individuals with suspected Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) referred for second opinion imaging consultation.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was performed at a single institution. A consecutive sample was performed of individuals who underwent a second opinion CT or MR angiography subspecialty radiologist consultation between January 2008 and September 2019 for suspected abdominal medium vessel vasculitis. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were collected. Clinical and imaging findings were reported for PAN, small vessel vasculitis, and "non-vasculitis" groups. Agreement and diagnostic accuracy between final clinical and second opinion imaging diagnoses for PAN were determined. Two-tailed t-tests with a significant p-value < 0.05 were utilized.

RESULTS

Of the 58 participants, 9 were clinically diagnosed with PAN, 11 with small vessel vasculitis (including lupus, IgA, and ANCA-associated vasculitis), and 38 with non-vasculitis diagnoses. The non-vasculitis group included 15 SAM, 3 FMD, and 1 SAM-FMD spectrum diagnoses. Higher C-reactive protein level (51 vs 17, p = 0.04) and superior mesenteric artery involvement (56% vs 21%, p = 0.04) were more common in PAN than non-vasculitis diagnoses, while arterial dissection (40% vs 0%, p = 0.02) and celiac vasculature involvement (53% vs 0%, p = 0.003) were more common in the non-vasculitis group. There was 88% agreement (51/58; Cohen's kappa 0.56); sensitivity was 67% [95%-confidence interval (CI) 30-93%] and specificity was 92% (95%-CI 80-98%).

CONCLUSION

Isolated celiac artery involvement and arterial dissection were more common in non-inflammatory vasculopathies than PAN. Our findings highlight the need for multidisciplinary collaboration and awareness of the diverse findings of abdominal vasculopathies.

A Single Center 8 Year Experience of Segmental Arterial Mediolysis Management

OBJECTIVE

Segmental Arterial Mediolysis (SAM) is a rare, poorly understood vasculopathy that involves vacuolization of the arterial wall, most commonly of the visceral arteries. There are no established therapeutic or monitoring guidelines for SAM, and intervention typically depends on patient presentation. The purpose of this study is to review the management and outcomes of patients with this rare vascular disease METHODS: Single center retrospective review of patients diagnosed with SAM between 2011 and 2019. Included were patients with radiological diagnosis of SAM. Demographic factors, past medical history, presenting symptoms, affected vessels, management, and lesion characteristics over time were collected. Demographic and periprocedural factors, and medical management strategies were compared for those who required operative intervention versus those managed non-operatively.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included, 21 (70%) were male, mean age was 53.5 years (range: 35.7-72.2). Twenty-seven patients were managed non-operatively, 3 patients required surgical intervention. Patients who underwent operative intervention were more likely to present with pain >30 days (P < 0.05), and hemorrhage (P < 0.01). Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (n = 24, 80%). Arterial dissection was the most common radiological finding at time of presentation (n = 20, 67%). The celiac artery and its branches were most often involved (n=22, 73%) followed by the superior mesenteric artery and its branches (n = 15, 50%). Non-operative management most often consisted of anti-hypertensive therapy (n = 13, 43%), antiplatelet agents (n = 17, 57%%), and lipid-lowering agents (n = 13, 43%), with 7 patients receiving all three. Six patients demonstrated confirmed resolution of lesions during surveillance imaging, with average time to resolution of 325.5 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent intervention for SAM presented with either mesenteric ischemia or pseudoaneurysm rupture. In patients that present without those conditions, medical management consisting of anti-hypertensives, antiplatelet agents, and lipid-lowering therapy was effective. Non operative management resulted in symptom resolution in all patients and surveillance imaging showed resolution of radiographic abnormalities in 6 patients out of 27 at less than one year.

Segmental arterial mediolysis: a rare cause of an acute abdomen

Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a nonatherosclerotic, noninflammatory and nonimmune arteriopathy of unknown aetiology. We present the case of a 43-year-old male who presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain. A computed tomography of abdomen and pelvis showed a narrow, hypodense superior mesenteric artery after the origin, raising the possibility of thrombus or vasculitis. He was commenced on rivaroxaban and steroids. He subsequently presented with an acute abdomen in a collapsed state. Repeat imaging of his abdomen and pelvis revealed an ischaemic ileal segment and caecum. He required an emergency laparotomy with resection of the ischaemic segment and formation of a double-barrelled stoma. SAM is an important diagnosis for clinicians and radiologists to be aware of, given the risks of life-threatening haemorrhage and acute organ ischaemia. This is a commonly overlooked cause of abdominal pain, where an early diagnosis with lifestyle modifications may prevent disease progression and subsequent development of life-threatening complications.

Beyond Atherosclerosis and Fibromuscular Dysplasia: Rare Causes of Renovascular Hypertension

Renovascular hypertension is one of the most common forms of secondary hypertension. Over 95% of cases of renovascular hypertension are due either to atherosclerosis of the main renal artery trunks or to fibromuscular dysplasia. These two causes of renal artery stenosis have been extensively discussed in recent reviews and consensus. The aim of the current article is to provide comprehensive and up-to-date information on the remaining causes. While these causes are rare or extremely rare, etiologic and differential diagnosis matters both for prognosis and management. Therefore, the clinician cannot ignore them. For didactic reasons, we have grouped these different entities into stenotic lesions (neurofibromatosis type 1 and other rare syndromes, dissection, arteritis, and segmental arterial mediolysis) often associated with aortic coarctation and other arterial abnormalities, and nonstenotic lesions, where hypertension is secondary to compression of adjacent arteries and changes in arterial pulsatility (aneurysm) or to the formation of a shunt, leading to kidney ischemia (arteriovenous fistula). Finally, thrombotic disorders of the renal artery may also be responsible for renovascular hypertension. Although thrombotic/embolic lesions do not represent primary vessel wall disease, they are characterized by frequent macrovascular involvement. In this review, we illustrate the most characteristic aspects of these different entities responsible for renovascular hypertension and discuss their prevalence, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management, and prognosis.

Beyond Atherosclerosis and Fibromuscular Dysplasia: Rare Causes of Renovascular Hypertension

Renovascular hypertension is one of the most common forms of secondary hypertension. Over 95% of cases of renovascular hypertension are due either to atherosclerosis of the main renal artery trunks or to fibromuscular dysplasia. These two causes of renal artery stenosis have been extensively discussed in recent reviews and consensus. The aim of the current article is to provide comprehensive and up-to-date information on the remaining causes. While these causes are rare or extremely rare, etiologic and differential diagnosis matters both for prognosis and management. Therefore, the clinician cannot ignore them. For didactic reasons, we have grouped these different entities into stenotic lesions (neurofibromatosis type 1 and other rare syndromes, dissection, arteritis, and segmental arterial mediolysis) often associated with aortic coarctation and other arterial abnormalities, and nonstenotic lesions, where hypertension is secondary to compression of adjacent arteries and changes in arterial pulsatility (aneurysm) or to the formation of a shunt, leading to kidney ischemia (arteriovenous fistula). Finally, thrombotic disorders of the renal artery may also be responsible for renovascular hypertension. Although thrombotic/embolic lesions do not represent primary vessel wall disease, they are characterized by frequent macrovascular involvement. In this review, we illustrate the most characteristic aspects of these different entities responsible for renovascular hypertension and discuss their prevalence, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management, and prognosis.

Beyond Atherosclerosis and Fibromuscular Dysplasia: Rare Causes of Renovascular Hypertension

Renovascular hypertension is one of the most common forms of secondary hypertension. Over 95% of cases of renovascular hypertension are due either to atherosclerosis of the main renal artery trunks or to fibromuscular dysplasia. These two causes of renal artery stenosis have been extensively discussed in recent reviews and consensus. The aim of the current article is to provide comprehensive and up-to-date information on the remaining causes. While these causes are rare or extremely rare, etiologic and differential diagnosis matters both for prognosis and management. Therefore, the clinician cannot ignore them. For didactic reasons, we have grouped these different entities into stenotic lesions (neurofibromatosis type 1 and other rare syndromes, dissection, arteritis, and segmental arterial mediolysis) often associated with aortic coarctation and other arterial abnormalities, and nonstenotic lesions, where hypertension is secondary to compression of adjacent arteries and changes in arterial pulsatility (aneurysm) or to the formation of a shunt, leading to kidney ischemia (arteriovenous fistula). Finally, thrombotic disorders of the renal artery may also be responsible for renovascular hypertension. Although thrombotic/embolic lesions do not represent primary vessel wall disease, they are characterized by frequent macrovascular involvement. In this review, we illustrate the most characteristic aspects of these different entities responsible for renovascular hypertension and discuss their prevalence, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management, and prognosis.

Beyond Atherosclerosis and Fibromuscular Dysplasia: Rare Causes of Renovascular Hypertension

Renovascular hypertension is one of the most common forms of secondary hypertension. Over 95% of cases of renovascular hypertension are due either to atherosclerosis of the main renal artery trunks or to fibromuscular dysplasia. These two causes of renal artery stenosis have been extensively discussed in recent reviews and consensus. The aim of the current article is to provide comprehensive and up-to-date information on the remaining causes. While these causes are rare or extremely rare, etiologic and differential diagnosis matters both for prognosis and management. Therefore, the clinician cannot ignore them. For didactic reasons, we have grouped these different entities into stenotic lesions (neurofibromatosis type 1 and other rare syndromes, dissection, arteritis, and segmental arterial mediolysis) often associated with aortic coarctation and other arterial abnormalities, and nonstenotic lesions, where hypertension is secondary to compression of adjacent arteries and changes in arterial pulsatility (aneurysm) or to the formation of a shunt, leading to kidney ischemia (arteriovenous fistula). Finally, thrombotic disorders of the renal artery may also be responsible for renovascular hypertension. Although thrombotic/embolic lesions do not represent primary vessel wall disease, they are characterized by frequent macrovascular involvement. In this review, we illustrate the most characteristic aspects of these different entities responsible for renovascular hypertension and discuss their prevalence, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management, and prognosis.

Natural history and management outcomes of segmental arterial mediolysis

BACKGROUND

Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a poorly understood, nonatherosclerotic, noninflammatory disease resulting from arterial medial degeneration. Patients may present with aneurysm, dissection, stenosis, or bleeding from visceral or renal arteries. Treatment algorithms are poorly characterized.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with SAM was performed at our institution. Patients were identified by established criteria that include clinical presentation in combination with radiographic and serologic findings. Demographics, presenting symptoms, diagnostic evaluation, management, and outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 117 patients diagnosed with SAM between 2000 and 2016; 67.5% (n = 79) were male. Mean age was 52.7 years (range, 23.4-90 years); 69.2% (n = 81) presented with acute abdominal pain, 22.2% (n = 26) with flank pain, and 19.7% (n = 23) with back pain; 15.4% (n = 18) had abdominal pain longer than 30 days; 13.7% (n = 16) had acute hypertension, and 5.1% (n = 6) were hypotensive; 10.3% (n = 12) were asymptomatic. There were 93 (79.5%) dissections and 61 (52.1%) aneurysms. Hemorrhage was seen in 10 (8.5%). The celiac axis was affected in 54.7% (n = 64), renal arteries in 49.6% (n = 5 8), superior mesenteric artery in 43.6% (n = 51), and inferior mesenteric artery in 2.6% (n = 3). After diagnosis of SAM, aspirin was prescribed in 60.7% (n = 71). Statins were prescribed in 29.9% (n = 35). Antihypertensive medications were prescribed in 65% (n = 76), including beta blockers in 42.7% (n = 50); 40.2% (n = 47) of patients were prescribed anticoagulation. Interventions were performed in 26 (22%) patients; 13 had endovascular intervention only, 9 open surgery only, and 4 open and endovascular interventions. Of the 17 patients undergoing endovascular intervention, 19 procedures were performed, most commonly embolization (78.9% [n = 15]), followed by stenting (10.5% [n = 2]). Of the 13 patients undergoing open surgery, 14 procedures were performed, including arterial bypass (50% [n = 7]) and splenectomy with aneurysm ligation (15.4% [n = 2]). Other surgery involved thrombectomy (21.4% [n = 3]) and angioplasty (14.3% [n = 2]). Only 11.5% (n = 3) experienced a perioperative complication, including one hematoma, one abscess, and one death secondary to ongoing hemorrhage. Follow-up imaging was performed in 96.6% (n = 112). Mean follow-up was 1258 days (range, 2-5017 days). Of these, 27.7% (n = 31) had regression, 43.8% (n = 49) stability, and 28.6% (n = 32) progression. Average time between initial diagnosis and progression was 666 days.

CONCLUSIONS

SAM is an uncommon disease that may require intervention; it is therefore important that the vascular surgery community be aware of this disease. Follow-up imaging is required to monitor for disease progression.

Contrast-Enhanced CT for the Diagnosis of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the diagnostic and prognostic roles of CT in the management of acute mesenteric ischemia. CONCLUSION. Acute mesenteric ischemia is defined as inadequate blood supply to the gastrointestinal tract resulting in ischemic and inflammatory injury. The prognosis is poor without treatment. Contrast-enhanced CT has become the cornerstone of diagnosis to identify features of vascular disorders and of intestinal ischemic injury and to visualize bowel necrosis.

High-Value Multidetector CT Angiography of the Superior Mesenteric Artery: What Emergency Medicine Physicians and Interventional Radiologists Need to Know

The superior mesenteric artery (SMA) provides vital blood supply to the midgut, and an acute abnormality can rapidly precipitate bowel ischemia and infarction and lead to morbidity and mortality. Vascular diseases that acutely compromise the SMA threaten its tributaries and include occlusion, dissection, aneurysm rupture, pseudoaneurysm, vasculitis, and SMA branch hemorrhage into the bowel. Emergency medicine physicians rely on the radiologist to identify SMA abnormalities, to characterize them, and to detail findings that guide the appropriate triage of these patients. As such, radiologists must be cognizant of the features that influence patient treatment to assist vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists in decision making. Some patients can be treated medically, while clinical and radiographic findings may suggest the need for interventional or surgical repair of the artery. In the latter case, multidetector CT findings aid in determining which of the various surgical and endovascular treatment options is optimal, and both vascular and gastrointestinal sequelae of acute SMA abnormalities contribute to these determinations. The authors review acute life-threatening conditions involving the SMA including acute occlusion, dissection, aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, and hemorrhage and discuss the vascular and gastrointestinal multidetector CT findings in each of these conditions that help to guide surgical and interventional management. ^©RSNA, 2019.

Frequency and causes of delayed diagnosis of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms with CT: Lessons learned

Objective

Visceral artery pseudoaneurysms (VAPA) are associated with a high morbidity and mortality, but sometimes are missed in initial computed tomography (CT) examinations. The aims of this study were to determine the frequency and causes of misdiagnoses of VAPA with CT.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively identified 77 patients with VAPA in our database who underwent contrast-enhanced CT. The frequency of delayed diagnosis was determined and the reasons were noted. We identified the etiology of VAPA, measured size, and noted the affected vessels.

Results

Forty-five of the 77 patients (58 %) had a delayed diagnosis of VAPA. There was no difference in the rate of missed VAPA in symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients (p = 0.255). The majority of VAPA were associated with previous surgery or interventions (n = 48/62 %). The major affected vessel was the hepatic (n = 31) followed by the splenic artery (n = 17). The main reasons for misdiagnosis were a missed arterial phase in CT (n = 16/36 %), artifacts masking the aneurysm (n = 9/20 %), overlooked pseudoaneurysm (n = 19/42 %), and misinterpretation by attending radiologists (n = 1/2 %). Missed VAPA were smaller (median 8 mm) than those VAPA that were initially diagnosed (median 13 mm, p < 0.01), but occurred with a similar frequency in larger and smaller visceral arteries (p = 0.601).

Conclusions

Our study showed that 58 % of VAPA were diagnosed with delay, with the following four reasons for misdiagnosis: Lack of an arterial contrast phase in CT, no techniques for artifact reduction, and lack of awareness of the radiologists. Avoiding delayed diagnosis will most probably improve outcome of patients with VAPA.

Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM): Systematic review and analysis of 143 cases

Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a rare but serious nonatherosclerotic, noninflammatory vasculopathy of unknown etiology that often results in dissection, aneurysm, occlusion, or stenosis of, primarily, the abdominal arteries. Current literature lacks consensus on diagnostic criteria and management options for SAM. This review summarizes 143 cases and aims to advance appropriate recognition and management of SAM. Literature review of all relevant SAM case studies from 2005 to 2018 yielded 126 individual SAM cases from 66 reports. We identified 17 additional SAM cases from our center, bringing our analysis to 143 patients. Patients with SAM were most commonly men (68%) in their 60s. Hypertension (43%), tobacco use (12%), and hyperlipidemia (12%) were common comorbidities. Abdominal pain (80%) and intraabdominal bleeding (50%) were the most common presenting symptoms. Computed tomography was the most frequently used imaging method (78%), and histology was available in 44% of cases. The most commonly affected vessels were the superior mesenteric (53%), hepatic (45%), celiac (36%), renal (26%), and splenic (25%) arteries with aneurysm (76%), dissection (61%), and arterial rupture (46%). Treatments included coil embolization (28%), abdominal organ surgery (24%), open arterial repair (21%), and medical management (20%). Case-specific treatment modalities yielded symptom relief in the vast majority (91%) of patients, with a mortality rate of 7%.

Coronary Artery Involvement in Segmental Arterial Mediolysis: A Case Report

Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is an increasingly recognized disorder affecting small- to medium-sized muscular arteries. A patient with SAM involving the visceral arteries who was also found to have multivessel coronary artery involvement is described. The patient underwent a battery of biochemical, imaging, and genetic tests to exclude other vasculitides and connective tissue disorders. The aim is to shed light on the potential for SAM to affect the coronary arteries and recommend screening of the coronary arteries of patients with SAM. © RSNA, 2019.

Spontaneous hemoperitoneum resulting from segmental arterial mediolysis

Segmental arterial mediolysis is a rare but potentially life-threatening arteropathy of medium to large arteries that can be managed with endovascular treatment for patients who are hemodynamically unstable. We present a case of segmental arterial mediolysis in a 73-year-old woman who developed spontaneous hemoperitoneum in the emergency department after initially presenting with unrelated upper respiratory complaints. Her initial computed tomography revealed an aneurysm arising off the right hepatic artery. She was taken to the interventional radiology suite for embolization and multiple aneurysms along the right hepatic artery were identified that had the appearance of segmental arterial mediolysis. She initially stabilized but then developed acute renal failure and had a decrease in hemoglobin on postprocedure day 2. She was taken back to the angiography suite where multiple small left gastric and left hepatic trunk aneurysms were identified, with a small area of extravasation evident. The vessel was coiled from the liver to the origin of the left gastric artery. She was discharged and had a follow-up angiogram 2 months later, which showed interval development of an aneurysm to the distal right hepatic artery.

Segmental Arterial Mediolysis: Abdominal Imaging of and Disease Course in 111 Patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to identify the imaging characteristics of segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) at presentation and establish the longitudinal course of disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with SAM at a single institution from 2000 through 2015. Diagnosis was based on published guidelines with multidisciplinary consensus. Imaging studies obtained at initial evaluation were reviewed to evaluate imaging findings and vascular territory distribution. All subsequent follow-up imaging studies were reviewed to assess for progression, stability, or regression.

RESULTS

We identified 111 patients (79 men and 32 women; median age, 51 years) who met the diagnostic criteria for SAM. Abdominal pain was the most common presentation (74%), followed by flank pain (21%). SAM most commonly affected the renal arteries (47%), superior mesenteric artery (46%), celiac trunk (46%), hepatic artery (23%), iliac arteries (18%), and splenic artery (14%). The most common imaging findings were dissection (86%), aneurysm (57%), beading or webs (28%), occlusion (19%), and a rind or wall thickening (15%). The 247 available follow-up imaging studies for 97 patients (median follow-up, 12 months) showed progression in 19 patients (20%), with either stability or regression observed in the remaining patients.

CONCLUSION

SAM most commonly affects the renal arteries, superior mesenteric artery, and celiac artery. Dissections and aneurysms are the most common imaging findings. Follow-up imaging studies show stability or regression in most patients.