A pilot study of the diagnostic and prognostic values of FLT-PET/CT for pancreatic cancer: comparison with FDG-PET/CT

Clinical value of PET/CT with carbon-11 4DST in the evaluation of malignant and benign lung tumors

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of [¹¹C]4DST uptake in patients with lung nodules, including benign and malignant tumors, and to assess the correlation between [¹¹C]4DST uptake and proliferative activity of tumors in comparison with [¹⁸F]FDG uptake.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients (22 males and 4 females, mean age of 65.5-year-old) were analyzed in this prospective study. Patients underwent [¹¹C]4DST and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT imaging on the same day. Diagnosis of each lung nodule was confirmed by histopathological examination of tissue specimens at surgery, or during clinical follow-up after the PET/CT studies. To assess the utility of the semi-quantitative evaluation method, the SUV_max was calculated of [¹¹C]4DST and [¹⁸F]FDG uptake by the lesion. Proliferative activities of each tumor as indicated by the immunohistochemical Ki-67 index was also estimated using surgical specimens of patients. Then the relationship between the SUV_max of both PET/CT and the Ki-67 index was examined. Furthermore, the relationship between the uptake of [¹¹C]4DST or [¹⁸F]FDG and the histopathological findings, the clinical stage, and the clinical outcome of patients were also assessed.

RESULTS

There was a positive linear relationship between the SUV_max of [¹¹C]4DST images and the Ki-67 index (Correlation coefficients = 0.68). The SUV_max of [¹¹C]4DST in the 26 lung nodules were 1.65 ± 0.40 for benign lesions, 3.09 ± 0.83 for adenocarcinomas (P < 0.001 between benign and adenocarcinoma), and 2.92 ± 0.58 for SqCCs (P < 0.001 between benign and SqCC). Whereas, the SUVmax of [¹⁸F]FDG were 2.38 ± 2.27 for benign lesions, 6.63 ± 4.24 for adenocarcinomas (n.s.), and 7.52 ± 2.84 for SqCCs (n.s.). The relationship between TNM tumor stage and the SUV_max of [¹¹C]4DST were 2.54 ± 0.37 for T1, 3.48 ± 0.57 for T2, and 4.17 ± 0.72 for T3 (P < 0.005 between T1 and T2, and P < 0.001 between T1 and T3). In comparison with the TNM pathological stage, SUVmax of [¹¹C]4DST were 2.63 ± 0.49 for stage I, 3.36 ± 0.23 for stage II, 3.40 ± 1.12 for stage III, and 4.65 for stage IV (P < 0.05 between stages I and II). In comparison of the clinical outcome, the SUV_max of [¹¹C]4DST were 2.72 ± 0.56 for the no recurrence (No Rec.) group, 3.10 ± 0.33 for the recurrence-free with adjuvant chemotherapy after the surgery (the No Rec. Adjv. CTx. group) and 4.66 ± 0.02 for the recurrence group (Rec. group) (P < 0.001 between the No Rec and Rec. groups, and P < 0.005 between the No Rec. Adjv. CTx. and Rec. groups).

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT with [¹¹C]4DST is as feasible for imaging of lung tumors as [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT. For diagnosing lung tumors, [¹¹C]4DST PET is useful in distinguishing benign nodules from malignancies. [¹¹C]4DST uptake in lung carcinomas is correlated with the proliferative activity of tumors, indicating a promising noninvasive PET imaging of DNA synthesis in malignant lung tumors.

Clinical Impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Diagnostic Workup of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review

In this review, the performance of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in the diagnostic workup of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is evaluated. A comprehensive literature search up to September 2020 was performed, selecting studies with the presence of: sample size ≥10 patients and index test (i.e., “FDG” or “18F-FDG” AND “pancreatic adenocarcinoma” or “pancreas cancer” AND “PET” or “positron emission tomography”). The methodological quality was evaluated using the revised quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool and presented according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Basic data (authors, year of publication, country and study design), patients’ characteristics (number of enrolled subjects and age), disease phase, type of treatment and grading were retrieved. Forty-six articles met the adopted research criteria. The articles were divided according to the considered clinical context. Namely, besides conventional anatomical imaging, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), molecular imaging with FDG PET/CT is an important tool in PDAC, for all disease stages. Further prospective studies will be necessary to confirm the cost-effectiveness of such imaging techniques by testing its real potential improvement in the clinical management of PDAC.

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Treatment Efficacy and Clinical Outcome for Patients With Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been an important modality for detecting malignancies. Recently, an increasing number of studies reported the utility of FDG-PET parameters in predicting clinical outcomes and treatment assessment in variety of cancers. We aimed at clarifying both the prognostic role and assessment value of FDG-PET in pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

We systematically searched electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies to conduct this meta-analysis. Comparative analyses of the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival were performed to assess the utility of FDG-PET parameters in prognosis evaluation and treatment assessment by random-effect model.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies with 1762 patients met the inclusion criteria of this meta-analysis. The pooled results revealed that greater maximum standardized uptake value of the primary tumor was significantly correlated with poorer overall survival (HR, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.50; P < 0.001). Besides, greater reduction of maximum standardized uptake value after treatments indicated significant better overall survival (HR, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.98; P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters might be helpful not only for predicting survival outcome but also for selecting potentially efficacious treatments in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.