Early assessment of coagulation necrosis after hepatic microwave ablation: a comparison of non-enhanced and enhanced T1-weighted images

A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation

Ultrasound ablation techniques are minimally invasive alternatives to surgical resection and have rapidly increased in use. The response of tissue to HIFU ablation differs based on the relative contributions of thermal and mechanical effects, which can be varied to achieve optimal ablation parameters for a given tissue type and location. In tumor ablation, similar to surgical resection, it is desirable to include a safety margin of ablated tissue around the entirety of the tumor. A factor in optimizing ablative techniques is minimizing the recurrence rate, which can be due to incomplete ablation of the target tissue. Further, combining focal ablation with immunotherapy is likely to be key for effective treatment of metastatic cancer, and therefore characterizing the impact of ablation on the tumor microenvironment will be important. Thus, visualization and quantification of the extent of ablation is an integral component of ablative procedures. The aim of this review article is to describe the radiological findings after ultrasound ablation across multiple imaging modalities. This review presents readers with a general overview of the current and emerging imaging methods to assess the efficacy of ultrasound ablative treatments.

Microwave Ablation of Small Hepatic Metastases Using MR Guidance and Monitoring: Clinical Safety and Efficacy

Background

To evaluate the technical success and clinical safety of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) of small hepatic metastases.

Materials and Methods

Institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were obtained. A retrospective analysis of the patient data revealed 50 patients with small hepatic metastases (34 men, 16 women) who underwent MWA under MR guidance and monitoring. After the procedure, the intervention-related complications were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification system. Furthermore, the overall survival (OS) and local tumor-free survival (LTP) of the patients were analyzed.

Results

The patients who underwent MR-guided MWA achieved technical success. The mean energy, ablation duration per tumor, and procedure duration were 55.3 ± 9.4 kJ, 11.7 ± 5.6 min and 89.5 ± 30.9 min, respectively. Most adverse events and complications were CTCAE grade 1 or 2 or SIR classification grade A or B. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local tumor progression (LTP) rates were 65.9%, 31.5% and 18.5%, respectively, with a mean LTP of 19.216 months (95% CI: 16.208, 22.224); and the 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 81.8%, 60.8% and 44.7%, respectively, with a mean OS of 26.378 months (95% CI: 23.485, 29.270). Multivariate Cox’s regression analysis further illustrated that tumor location (challenging locations vs ordinary locations) and the anesthesia (general anesthesia VS local anesthesia) were important factors affecting LTP and OS.

Conclusion

MR-guided MWA can successfully treat small hepatic metastases with potentially favorable safety and technical efficacy.

Microwave ablation of hepatic malignant tumors using 1.5T MRI guidance and monitoring: feasibility and preliminary clinical experience

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and therapeutic efficacy of 1.5-T MRI-guided and monitored microwave ablation in patients with hepatic malignant tumors.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. Thirty-five patients (32 men, three women) with 48 lesions (maximum diameter < 3 cm) underwent microwave ablation under the guidance and monitoring of a 1.5-T MRI. The MRI-compatible microwave generator was appended with a magnetic shield case, and the cable was combined with a choke coil for shielding the Larmor processing frequency. The average age of the patients was 56.51 ± 11.36 years (31-77 years). Twenty-eight patients (37 lesions) displayed hepatocellular carcinoma and seven patients (11 lesions) had metastatic liver carcinoma. The mean maximum tumor diameter was 12.31 ± 4.72 mm (range 5.0-25.7 mm).Results: MRI scans were performed simultaneously without electromagnetic interference during ablation. The average maximum diameter of the hypointense zone of the last monitored T2WI sequence, hypointense zone of post-procedure T2WI sequence, and hyperintense zone of post-procedure T1WI were 28.82 ± 7.58 mm, 29.79 ± 7.91 mm, and 28.28 ± 8.37 mm, respectively, with no observed statistical difference (F = 0.434, p = .649). The technical success rate was 100%. The average follow-up duration was 11.43 ± 5.29 (4-33) months. The technique efficacy rate was 100%.Conclusion: MRI-guided and monitored microwave ablation of hepatic malignant tumors is feasible and potentially safe and effective.Key pointsMRI-guided microwave ablation of hepatic malignant tumors is feasible.The MRI monitoring scan could accurately reflect the scope of ablation lesion.On T1WI, the ablation lesions of liver showed the 'target sign'.

Percutaneous Liver Tumour Ablation: Image Guidance, Endpoint Assessment, and Quality Control

Liver tumour ablation nowadays represents a routine treatment option for patients with primary and secondary liver tumours. Radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation are the most widely adopted methods, although novel techniques, such as irreversible electroporation, are quickly working their way up. The percutaneous approach is rapidly gaining popularity because of its minimally invasive character, low complication rate, good efficacy rate, and repeatability. However, matched to partial hepatectomy and open ablations, the issue of ablation site recurrences remains unresolved and necessitates further improvement. For percutaneous liver tumour ablation, several real-time imaging modalities are available to improve tumour visibility, detect surrounding critical structures, guide applicators, monitor treatment effect, and, if necessary, adapt or repeat energy delivery. Known predictors for success are tumour size, location, lesion conspicuity, tumour-free margin, and operator experience. The implementation of reliable endpoints to assess treatment efficacy allows for completion-procedures, either within the same session or within a couple of weeks after the procedure. Although the effect on overall survival may be trivial, (local) progression-free survival will indisputably improve with the implementation of reliable endpoints. This article reviews the available needle navigation techniques, evaluates potential treatment endpoints, and proposes an algorithm for quality control after the procedure.