Split-bolus pancreas CTA protocol for local staging of pancreatic cancer and detection and characterization of liver lesions

Simulated twin-phase pancreatic CT generated using single portal venous phase dual-energy CT acquisition in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a simulated twin-phase pancreatic protocol CT generated from a single portal venous phase (PVP) dual-energy CT (DECT) acquisition in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 63 patients with PDAC who underwent pancreatic protocol (pancreatic phase [PP] and PVP) DECT. Two data sets were created from this original acquisition-(1) Standard protocol (50 keV PP/65 keV PVP) and (2) Simulated protocol (40 keV/65 keV PVP). Using a 5-point scale, three readers scored image quality, tumor conspicuity, and arterial involvement by the PDAC. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the pancreas and tumor-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Qualitative scores, quantitative parameters, and radiation dose were compared between standard and simulated protocols.

RESULTS

No significant difference in detection rate of PDAC was seen between the standard (58/63, 92.1%) and simulated protocols (56/63, 88.9%) (P = 0.76). Subjective scoring for arterial involvement for celiac (P = 0.86), superior mesenteric (P = 0.88), splenic (P = 0.86), common hepatic (P = 0.52), gastroduodenal (P = 0.95), first jejunal (P = 0.48) arteries, and aorta (P = 1.00) were comparable between two protocols. The image quality (P = 0.14), the SNR of the pancreas (P = 0.15), and CNR (P = 0.54) were comparable between two protocols. The projected mean dose-length product (DLP) (629.6 ± 148.3 mGy cm) in the simulated protocol showed a 44% reduction in radiation dose compared to the standard protocol (mean DLP, 1123.3 ± 268.9 mGy cm) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Low keV images generated from a PVP DECT acquisition allows creation of a twin-phase pancreatic protocol CT with comparable diagnostic accuracy for detecting PDAC with significant reduction in radiation dose. Reduced radiation dose is desirable in surveillance and screening for pancreatic diseases.

Low keV portal venous phase as a surrogate for pancreatic phase in a pancreatic protocol dual-energy CT: feasibility, image quality, and lesion conspicuity

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of a proposed pancreatic protocol CT generated from portal-venous phase (PVP) dual-energy CT (DECT) acquisition and its impact on image quality, lesion conspicuity, and arterial visualization/involvement.

METHODS

We included 111 patients (mean age, 66.8 years) who underwent pancreatic protocol DECT (pancreatic phase, PP, and PVP). The original DECT acquisition was used to create two data sets-standard protocol (50 keV PP/65 keV PVP) and proposed protocol (40 keV/65 keV PVP). Three reviewers evaluated the two data sets for image quality, lesion conspicuity, and arterial visualization/involvement using a 5-point scale. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of pancreas and lesion-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Qualitative scores, quantitative parameters, and dose-length product (DLP) were compared between standard and proposed protocols.

RESULTS

The image quality, SNR of pancreas, and lesion-to-pancreas CNR of the standard and proposed protocol were comparable (p = 0.11-1.00). Lesion conspicuity was comparable between the standard and proposed protocols for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (p = 0.55) and pancreatic cysts (p = 0.28). The visualization of larger arteries and arterial involvement were comparable between the two protocols (p = 0.056-1.00) while the scores were higher for smaller vessels in the standard protocol (p < 0.0001-0.0015). DLP of the proposed protocol (670.4 mGy·cm) showed a projected 42% reduction than the standard protocol (1145.9 mGy·cm) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic protocol CT generated from a single PVP DECT acquisition is feasible and could potentially be an alternative to the standard pancreatic protocol with PP and PVP.

KEY POINTS

• The lesion conspicuity for focal pancreatic lesions was comparable between the proposed protocol and standard dual-phase pancreatic protocol CT. • Qualitative and quantitative image assessments were almost comparable between two protocols. • The radiation dose of a proposed protocol showed a projected 42% reduction from the conventional protocol.

Split-bolus CTA for mesenteric ischemia with a single scan opacifying arterial and mesenteric venous systems

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of split-bolus single-scan computed tomography angiography (CTA) protocol for evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia and alternate diagnoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, consecutive patients from 21 October 2016 to 6 May 2018 evaluated for mesenteric ischemia with split-bolus CTA (a single scan in concurrent arterial and portal venous phase) in a single tertiary academic institution were included. Intravenous contrast was administered on weight-based basis. Quantitative and qualitative assessments of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) attenuation and patency were performed by two independent reviewers. CT imaging findings were correlated with clinical reference outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four patients (age 66.3 ± 14.1 years, BMI 27.3 ± 6, 86 (56%) female) were included. CTA studies were performed with a volumetric CT dose index of 15.9 ± 5.5 mSv and dose length product of 1042.9 ± 389.4 mGy cm. Average intravenous contrast volume administered was 164.3 ± 12.1 cc. SMA attenuation was 263.6 ± 92.4HU, SMV was 190 ± 50.2HU. Qualitative assessment of SMA and SMV showed good opacification in all patients. 17/154 (11%) patients were diagnosed on CT with mesenteric ischemia; in 6/154 (4%), CTA studies were indeterminate; in 131/154 (85%), CTA confidently ruled out mesenteric ischemia. Alternate diagnoses were made in 38/154 (25%) patients. Using composite clinical outcomes as a reference standard, sensitivity of split-bolus CTA protocol for diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia is 100% (95% CI 79-100%), and specificity is 99% (95% CI 96-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Split-bolus CTA has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia.

KEY POINTS

• Split-bolus CTA protocol for mesenteric ischemia has great diagnostic accuracy with lower radiation exposure and fewer images to interpret compared with standard multiphasic CTA.

White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part II, update on imaging techniques and screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy with a poor 5-year survival rate. Its high mortality rate is attributed to its aggressive biology and frequently late presentation. While surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment, only 10-20% of patients will present with surgically resectable disease. Over the past several years, development of vascular bypass graft techniques and introduction of neoadjuvant treatment regimens have increased the number of patients who can undergo resection with a curative intent. While the role of conventional imaging in the detection, characterization, and staging of patients with PDAC is well established, its role in monitoring treatment response, particularly following neoadjuvant therapy remains challenging because of the complex anatomic and histological nature of PDAC. Novel morphologic and functional imaging techniques (such as DECT, DW-MRI, and PET/MRI) are being investigated to improve the diagnostic accuracy and the ability to measure response to therapy. There is also a growing interest to detect PDAC and its precursor lesions at an early stage in asymptomatic patients to increase the likelihood of achieving cure. This has led to the development of pancreatic cancer screening programs. This article will review recent updates in imaging techniques and the current status of screening and surveillance of individuals at a high risk of developing PDAC.

Split-bolus vs. multiphasic contrast bolus protocol in patients with pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and dose reduction potential of a split-bolus protocol(SBP) compared with a multiphasic protocol(MPP) in the detection of recurrent or progressive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC) or cholangiocarcinoma(CC) using contrast- enhanced computed tomography(CECT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 56 patients who underwent CECT, 28 with our institutional standard MPP(100 ml contrast bolus) and 28 with a novel SBP(110 ml). Radiation exposure was determined in terms of total dose- length product(DLP) and computed tomography dose index(CTDI). Image quality was measured objectively by analysis of attenuation in Hounsfield units(HU) in regions of interest(ROIs) and subjectively by two blinded readers using a Likert scale. Diagnostic accuracy and interreader variability were tested.

RESULTS

The total DLP of the SBP group(498.1 ± 43.7 mGy*cm) was significantly lower than in the MPP group(1,092.5 ± 106.9 mGy*cm; p < 0.001). The SBP showed higher contrast enhancement of all critical anatomical structures including portal vein, liver, and pancreas compared with the MPP, except for the aorta(SBP: 326.9 ± 15.7 HU vs. MPP: 246.7 ± 12.2 HU; p < 0.001). Subjective analysis revealed poorer image quality ratings for important landmarks with the MPP (resection surface: p = 0.624, portal vein: p = 0.395, liver p = 0.361). The two blinded readers correlated significantly. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV), and overall interreader variabilities correlated significantly. Furthermore, significantly fewer slices per exam were required for the SBP(1,823 vs. 3,235; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The SBP provides the same image quality and diagnostic accuracy as an MPP while significantly lowering radiation exposure in CT follow-up of PDAC or CC.

Applicability of current NCCN Guidelines for pancreatic adenocarcinoma resectability: analysis and pitfalls

PURPOSE

To test the applicability of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN v 3.2017) resectability criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in clinical practice, at a high-volume tertiary referral center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

102 consecutive patients (53 female; mean age 66.2 years, range 34-90 years) with biopsy proven, non-metastatic PDAC were evaluated by our multidisciplinary pancreatic cancer program between July 2013 and February 2016. Retrospective review of staging pancreatic CT angiography was performed, and radiographic features were categorized as conforming to or non-conforming to existing v 3.2017 definitions.

RESULTS

Among 102 patients, 10 (10%) had CTA evidence of vascular involvement that did not conform to existing NCCN Guidelines. Six new scenarios of vascular involvement were identified. The remaining 92 patients presented with resectable (n = 20 [22%]), borderline resectable (n = 42 [45.6%]), or unresectable (n = 30 [33%]) PDAC. Approximately half (n = 21 [51%]) of borderline resectable patients' tumors demonstrated isolated venous involvement, whereas 39% had both arterial and venous involvement. A minority (11%) demonstrated only major arterial involvement. Assignment to unresectable status reflected both arterial and venous involvement (11, 37%), arterial involvement only (10, 33%) patients, and unreconstructible venous involvement in 9 (30%).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, current NCCN resectability guidelines for PDAC do not accurately classify vascular involvement identified in approximately 10% of patients. Revision of the current guidelines could be helpful to clinical practice.