Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in interventional oncology

Intraoperative Imaging Techniques in Oncology

Imaging-based procedures have become well integrated into the diagnosis and management of oncological patients and play a significant role in reducing morbidity and mortality rates. Here we describe the established and upcoming surgical oncological imaging techniques and their impact on cancer management.

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Contrast-Enhanced US Nonradiation Treatment Response Assessment Version 2024

The American College of Radiology Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) standardizes the imaging technique, reporting lexicon, disease categorization, and management for patients with or at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). LI-RADS encompasses HCC surveillance with US; HCC diagnosis with CT, MRI, or contrast-enhanced US (CEUS); and treatment response assessment (TRA) with CT or MRI. LI-RADS was recently expanded to include CEUS TRA after nonradiation locoregional therapy or surgical resection. This report provides an overview of LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024, including a lexicon of imaging findings, techniques, and imaging criteria for posttreatment tumor viability assessment. LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024 takes into consideration differences in the CEUS appearance of viable tumor and posttreatment changes within and in close proximity to a treated lesion. Due to the high sensitivity of CEUS to vascular flow, posttreatment reactive changes commonly manifest as areas of abnormal perilesional enhancement without washout, especially in the first 3 months after treatment. To improve the accuracy of CEUS for nonradiation TRA, different diagnostic criteria are used to evaluate tumor viability within and outside of the treated lesion margin. Broader criteria for intralesional enhancement increase sensitivity for tumor viability detection. Stricter criteria for perilesional enhancement limit miscategorization of posttreatment reactive changes as viable tumor. Finally, the TRA algorithm reconciles intralesional and perilesional tumor viability assessment and assigns a single LI-RADS treatment response (LR-TR) category: LR-TR nonviable, LR-TR equivocal, or LR-TR viable.

The adoption of LI-RADS: a survey of non-academic radiologists

PURPOSE

To understand the practice and determinants of non-academic radiologists regarding LI-RADS and the four current LI-RADS algorithms: CT/MRI, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), ultrasound (US), and CT/MRI Treatment Response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven themes were covered in this international survey, as follows: (1) demographics of participants and sub-specialty, (2) HCC practice and interpretation, (3) reporting practice, (4) screening and surveillance, (5) HCC imaging diagnosis, (6) treatment response, and (7) CT and MRI technique.

RESULTS

Of the 232 participants, 69.4% were from the United States, 25.0% from Canada, and 5.6% from other countries and 45.9% were abdominal/body imagers. During their radiology training or fellowship, no formal HCC diagnostic system was used by 48.7% and LI-RADS was used by 44.4% of participants. In their current practice, 73.6% used LI-RADS, 24.7% no formal system, 6.5% UNOS-OPTN, and 1.3% AASLD. Barriers to LI-RADS adoption included lack of familiarity (25.1%), not used by referring clinicians (21.6%), perceived complexity (14.5%), and personal preference (5.3%). The US LI-RADS algorithm was used routinely by 9.9% of respondents and CEUS LI-RADS was used by 3.9% of the respondents. The LI-RADS treatment response algorithm was used by 43.5% of the respondents. 60.9% of respondents thought that webinars/workshops on LI-RADS Technical Recommendations would help them implement these recommendations in their practice.

CONCLUSION

A majority of the non-academic radiologists surveyed use the LI-RADS CT/MR algorithm for HCC diagnosis, while nearly half use the LI-RADS TR algorithm for assessment of treatment response. Less than 10% of the participants routinely use the LI-RADS US and CEUS algorithms.

Imaging and Interventions for Lymphatic and Lymphatic-related Disorders

The lymphatic system is critical in fluid balance homeostasis. Yet, until recently, lymphatic imaging has been outside of mainstream medicine due to a lack of robust imaging and interventional options. However, during the last 20 years, both clinical lymphatic imaging and interventions have shown dramatic advancement. The key to imaging advancement has been the interstitial delivery of contrast agents through lymphatic-rich tissues. These techniques include intranodal lymphangiography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography. These methods provide the ability to image and recognize lymphatic anatomy and pathologic conditions. Percutaneous thoracic duct catheterization and embolization became the first widely accepted interventional technique for the management of chyle leaks. Advances in interstitial lymphatic embolization, as well as liver and mesenteric lymphatic interventions, have broadened the scope of possible lymphatic interventions. Also, recent techniques of lymphatic decompression allow for the treatment of a variety of lymphatic disorders. Finally, immunologic studies of central lymphatic fluid reveal the potential of lymphatic interventions on immunity. These advances herald an exciting new chapter for lymphatic imaging and interventions in the coming years.

Effect of acoustic cluster therapy (ACT®) combined with chemotherapy in a patient-derived xenograft mouse model of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas respond poorly to chemotherapy, in part due to the dense tumor stroma that hinders drug delivery. Ultrasound (US) in combination with microbubbles has previously shown promise as a means to improve drug delivery, and the therapeutic efficacy of ultrasound-mediated drug delivery is currently being evaluated in multiple clinical trials. However, most of these utilize echogenic contrast agents engineered for imaging, which might not be optimal compared to specialized formulations tailored for drug delivery. In this study, we evaluated the in vivo efficacy of phase-shifting microbubble-microdroplet clusters that, upon insonation, form bubbles in the size range of 20-30 μm. We developed a patient-derived xenograft model of pancreatic cancer implanted in mice that largely retained the stromal content of the originating tumor and compared tumor growth in mice given chemotherapeutics (nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or liposomal irinotecan) with mice given the same chemotherapeutics in addition to ultrasound and acoustic cluster therapy. We found that acoustic cluster therapy significantly improved the effect of both chemotherapeutic regimens and resulted in 7.2 times higher odds of complete remission of the tumor compared to the chemotherapeutics alone.

A Review of Clinical Applications for Super-resolution Ultrasound Localization Microscopy

Microvascular structure and hemodynamics are important indicators for the diagnosis and assessment of many diseases and pathologies. The structural and functional imaging of tissue microvasculature in vivo is a clinically significant objective for the development of many imaging modalities. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a popular clinical tool for characterizing tissue microvasculature, due to the moderate cost, wide accessibility, and absence of ionizing radiation of ultrasound. However, in practice, it remains challenging to demonstrate microvasculature using CEUS, due to the resolution limit of conventional ultrasound imaging. In addition, the quantification of tissue perfusion by CEUS remains hindered by high operator-dependency and poor reproducibility. Inspired by super-resolution optical microscopy, super-resolution ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) was recently developed. ULM uses the same ultrasound contrast agent (i.e. microbubbles) in CEUS. However, different from CEUS, ULM uses the location of the microbubbles to construct images, instead of using the backscattering intensity of microbubbles. Hence, ULM overcomes the classic compromise between imaging resolution and penetration, allowing for the visualization of capillary-scale microvasculature deep within tissues. To date, many in vivo ULM results have been reported, including both animal (kidney, brain, spinal cord, xenografted tumor, and ear) and human studies (prostate, tibialis anterior muscle, and breast cancer tumors). Furthermore, a variety of useful biomarkers have been derived from using ULM for different preclinical and clinical applications. Due to the high spatial resolution and accurate blood flow speed estimation (approximately 1 mm/s to several cm/s), ULM presents as an enticing alternative to CEUS for characterizing tissue microvasculature in vivo. This review summarizes the principles and present applications of CEUS and ULM, and discusses areas where ULM can potentially provide a better alternative to CEUS in clinical practice and areas where ULM may not be a better alternative. The objective of the study is to provide clinicians with an up-to-date review of ULM technology, and a practical guide for implementing ULM in clinical research and practice.

The quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of small renal cell carcinoma subtypes and angiomyolipoma

Background

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been widely used for renal lesion diagnosis and differential diagnosis. However, qualitative analysis of CEUS is subject to examinations with low reproducibility. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic value of CEUS quantitative parameters in differentiating small renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes and angiomyolipoma (AML).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 97 cases of a small renal mass undergoing a CEUS before a radical or partial nephrectomy procedure. A region of interest (ROI) was placed in the tumor's maximum enhanced region (ROI_max) as much as possible, and adjacent renal cortex (ROI_refer) was selected from normal renal tissue around a mass of the same depth. The time-intensity curve (TIC) was used to analyze the ROI_max and the ROI_refer of the tumors quantitatively. Then the parameters of the ROI_max and the ROI_refer, including the differences between the parameters of the ROI_max and the ROI_refer, were analyzed statistically.

Results

In RCC and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the peak intensity (PI), slope (SL), area under the curve (AUC), area under the wash-in curve (AWI), area under the wash-out curve (AWO), time to peak intensity (TTP) and the mean transit time (MTT) were statistically significant between ROI_max and ROI_refer (all P=0.000). The △PI (△PI = PI_max - PI_refer), △SL (△SL = SL_max - SL_refer), △AUC (△AUC = AUC_max - AUC_refer), △AWI (△AWI = AWI_max - AWI_refer) and △AWO (△AWO = AWO_max - AWO_refer) of RCC were significantly higher than in AML (P=0.007, 0.000, 0.003, 0.048, 0.009, respectively), while the TTP (△TTP = TTP_max - TTP_refer) and △MTT (△MTT = MTT_max - MTT_refer) of RCC were significantly lower (both P=0.000). In comparison with papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), the △PI, △SL, △AUC and △AWO of ccRCC were all larger (all P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the combination of parameter difference for differentiating RCC from AML were 100%, 81.2%, and 0.965, respectively, and for differentiating ccRCC from pRCC and chRCC, 85.71%, 85.92% and 0.911, respectively.

Conclusions

CEUS quantitative parameters have value in differentiating small RCC from AML and distinguishing ccRCC from pRCC and chRCC.

Evaluation of Suspected Small Bowel Ischemia Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with Computed Tomography Fusion

Small bowel ischemia can lead to fatal complications such as necrosis, perforation, and sepsis. Clinical examinations and laboratory tests are usually inconclusive in critically ill patients. The need for surgical exploration is decided based on imaging, examination, and clinical judgment. The decision to operate is time-critical and can be lifesaving, but surgical intervention has the potential to cause additional morbidity, especially in unstable patients. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is the study of choice in suspected small bowel ischemia but has poor specificity. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) provides real-time visualization of the bowel wall vascularity. In this case report, we used a CEUS with CT fusion examination to rule out small bowel ischemia in a critically ill patient with suspected closed loop small bowel obstruction on CECT and in whom surgical exploration would have not been well tolerated. The patient's condition later improved, and an abdominal CT showed no evidence of obstruction.

[Alternatives of histological material collection - When and how is histological confirmation by ultrasound (US), computer tomography (CT) or endosonography (EUS) useful?]

Histological classifications of tumorous lesions together with adequate staging are necessary for stage-appropriate and personalized therapies. The indications, technical possibilities, and limitations as well as potential complications of image-guided needle biopsy by ultrasound, computed tomography, and endosonography are described. Which procedure for which organ and which lesion?

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in pediatric interventional radiology

There is growing interest in the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in diagnostic and interventional radiology. CEUS applications in interventional radiology are performed with intravascular or intracavitary administration of microbubble-based US contrast agents to allow for real-time evaluation of their distribution within the vascular bed or in body cavities, respectively, providing additional information beyond gray-scale US alone. The most common interventional-radiology-related CEUS applications in children have been extrapolated from those in adults, and they include the use of CEUS to guide lesion biopsy and to confirm drain placement in pleural effusions and intra-abdominal fluid collections. Other applications are emerging in interventional radiology for use in adults and children, including CEUS to optimize sclerotherapy of vascular malformations, to guide arthrography, and for lymphatic interventions. In this review article we present a wide range of interventional-radiology-related CEUS applications, emphasizing the current and potential uses in children. We highlight the technical parameters of the CEUS examination and discuss the main imaging findings.

Meta-analysis and systematic review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the treatment response after locoregional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a useful tool to assess treatment response after percutaneous ablation or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the usefulness of CEUS in identifying residual tumor after locoregional therapy.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library databases were searched from their inception until March 8, 2021, for diagnostic test accuracy studies comparing CEUS to a reference standard for identifying residual tumors after locoregional therapy of HCC. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were obtained using a bivariate random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed by stratifying the studies based on study design, type of locoregional therapy, CEUS criteria for residual tumor, timing of CEUS follow up, and type of standard reference.

RESULTS

Two reviewers independently evaluated 1479 publications. After full-text review, 142 studies were found to be relevant, and 43 publications (50 cohorts) were finally included. The overall sensitivity of CEUS in detection of residual disease estimated from the bivariate random effects model was 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.89). Similarly, the overall specificity was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96). The diagnostic accuracy was 93.5%. The DOR was 70.1 (95% CI 62.2-148), and the AUROC was 0.95. Importantly, subgroup analysis showed no apparent differences in the diagnostic performance between locoregional therapy (TACE vs. ablation) and criteria used to define residual enhancement, timing of performing CEUS, study design, or type of reference standard.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is a highly accurate method to identify HCC residual tumor after TACE or percutaneous ablation.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Mediastinal Tumors

The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) with respect to their value in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant mediastinal tumors. Forty-two patients with mediastinal tumor underwent CEUS and CE-MRI respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic coincidence rate, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value of the two methods were compared. The value of different enhancement patterns in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant mediastinal tumors was analyzed. SonoLiver software was used to obtain the dynamic vascular pattern curve (DVPC) of the lesions, and parameters such as arrival time (AT), rise time (RT), time to peak (TTP), maximum intensity/peak intensity (IMAX) and quality of fit (QOF) were extracted from time-intensity curves for quantitative analysis. We found that (i) the specificity of CEUS was higher than that of CE-MRI, and the PPV and diagnostic coincidence rate of CEUS were equal to those of CE-MRI; (ii) the enhancement patterns and DVPC of CEUS differed between the benign and malignant groups, while there was no difference in CE-MRI enhancement intensity; and (iii) AT, RT and TTP in the malignant groups were significantly shorter, while IMAX was significantly higher. In conclusion, the application of quantitative parameters and DVPC of CEUS is worth popularizing. CEUS can be used as an effective alternative and complementary examination for patients who cannot undergo CE-MRI.

The independent indicators for differentiating renal cell carcinoma from renal angiomyolipoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Background

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and angiomyolipoma (AML) was analyzed. The purpose of this study was to identify the independent indicators of CEUS for predicting RCC.

Methods

A total of 172 renal tumors (150 RCCs, 22 AMLs) in 165 patients underwent conventional ultrasound (CUS) and CEUS examinations before radical or partial nephrectomy, and the features on CUS and CEUS were analyzed.

Results

There were significant differences in echogenicity, blood flow signals in color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), peak intensity, homogeneity of enhancement, wash in, wash out, and perilesional rim-like enhancement between RCC and AML (P < 0.05 for all). Multivariate analysis indicated that perilesional rim-like enhancement (P = 0.035, odds ratio [OR] = 9.907, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.169–83.971) and fast wash out (P = 0.001, OR = 9.755, 95%[CI]: 2.497–38.115) were independent indicators for predicting RCC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for perilesional rim-like enhancement was 0.838 (95% CI: 0.774–0.890) with 76.7% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity, while the AUC of fast wash out was 0.833 (95% CI:0.768–0.885) with 74.7% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity.

Conclusions

This study indicated that CEUS has value in differentiating RCC and AML. Present perilesional rim-like enhancement and fast wash out may be important indicators for predicting RCC.

Clinical application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after percutaneous renal tumor ablation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in detecting incomplete ablation and local recurrence of renal tumors after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

31 patients were included for RFA treatment and underwent CEUS examination after RFA, ablation zone and contrast distribution in the ablation area were observed, CEUS images were compared with enhanced CT/MRI images to determine the residual tumors and local recurrence of renal tumors.

RESULTS

The average maximum diameters of the tumor and the ablation zone after the first RFA were 32.3 ± 14.7 mm and 35.9 ± 12.2 mm, respectively. A higher rate of complete tumor ablation was achieved if the ablation zone was larger than the primary tumor (p = 0.026). Within 1 month after RFA, contrast-enhanced CT/MRI examinations demonstrated incomplete ablation in 9 of 31 patients (29.0%), while CEUS revealed incomplete ablation in 8 of 31 patients (25.8%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CEUS in evaluating complete ablation of renal tumors were 88.9%, 100%, 100%, 95.7%, respectively. During the follow-up period, local recurrence was reported in 2 (7.4%) of the 27 patients with complete tumor ablation. Tumor recurrence signs in the two patients were identified by both CEUS and contrast-enhanced CT/MRI. Therefore, both the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the evaluation of tumor recurrence were 100%.

CONCLUSION

After percutaneous RFA of renal tumors, the effectiveness of CEUS in the follow-up assessment of residual and recurrent tumors is basically the same as that of contrast-enhanced CT/MRI.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of CEUS in the follow-up assessment of residual and recurrent tumors after RFA is basically the same as that of contrast-enhanced CT/MRI. Combining multiple follow-up methods may improve the detection rate of residual or recurrent tumors.

Diagnostic value and clinical significance of ultrasound combined with CT in cystic renal cell carcinoma

This study investigated the value and clinical significance of ultrasound combined with CT in the diagnosis of cystic renal cell carcinoma. A total of 85 patients with cystic renal cell carcinoma, who were admitted to the Oncology Department of Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University from December 2015 to April 2017, were selected as the study group, and 70 patients with benign renal cyst, who were examined in Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, were selected as the benign group. The patients in the two groups were examined by ultrasound and CT. The diagnostic value of ultrasound, CT, and ultrasound combined with CT in cystic renal cell carcinoma was analyzed. The sensitivity of ultrasound combined with CT was significantly higher than that of CT and ultrasound (P<0.05). The specificity and diagnostic coincidence rate of ultrasound combined with CT were significantly higher than those of CT (P<0.05). For unicapsular kidney cancer, there was no significant difference among ultrasound, CT and ultrasound combined with CT in the diagnosis of septum and wall nodule (P>0.05). For polycystic kidney cancer, there was no significant difference among ultrasound, CT and ultrasound combined with CT in the diagnosis of the presence or absence of septum (P>0.05). Ultrasound was significantly better than CT in cyst wall confounding (P<0.05). Ultrasound combined with CT was significantly better than ultrasound in calcification and blood supply of tumors (P<0.05). In conclusion, the accuracy of ultrasound combined with CT is higher than that of ultrasound or that of CT in the diagnosis of cystic renal cell carcinoma, which can be beneficial in accurately carrying out clinical diagnosis, reduce the incidence of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis caused by a single diagnosis and treatment. Ultrasound combined with CT is good for clinical screening and can guide clinical symptomatic treatment, which is worthy of generalizing in clinic.