Quantitative multiparametric MR analysis of small renal lesions: correlation with surgical pathology

[Nephron sparing in the management of localized solid renal mass]

Managing a malignant renal tumor requires, first of all, a reflection on the necessity of its treatment. It must consider the renal function, altered at the time of diagnosis in 50% of cases. The treatment method chosen depends on many factors, in particular, the predicted residual renal function, the risk of chronic kidney disease, the need for temporary or long-term dialysis, and overall long-term survival. Other factors include the size, position, and number of tumors and a hereditary tumor background. When a renal-sparing management alternative is available, total nephrectomy should no longer be performed in patients with small malignant renal masses (cT1a). This may consist of surgery (partial nephrectomy or lumpectomy), percutaneous thermo-ablation (by radiofrequency, microwave, or cryotherapy). In patients with limited life expectancy, imaging-based surveillance may be proposed to suggest treatment in case of local progression. Good coordination between urologist, radiologist, nephrologist, and sometimes radiotherapist should allow optimal management of patients with a malignant renal tumor with or without underlying renal failure.

Scientific Status Quo of Small Renal Lesions: Diagnostic Assessment and Radiomics

Background: Small renal masses (SRMs) are defined as contrast-enhanced renal lesions less than or equal to 4 cm in maximal diameter, which can be compatible with stage T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Currently, 50-61% of all renal tumors are found incidentally. Methods: The characteristics of the lesion influence the choice of the type of management, which include several methods SRM of management, including nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, ablation, observation, and also stereotactic body radiotherapy. Typical imaging methods available for differentiating benign from malignant renal lesions include ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Although ultrasound is the first imaging technique used to detect small renal lesions, it has several limitations. CT is the main and most widely used imaging technique for SRM characterization. The main advantages of MRI compared to CT are the better contrast resolution and tissue characterization, the use of functional imaging sequences, the possibility of performing the examination in patients allergic to iodine-containing contrast medium, and the absence of exposure to ionizing radiation. For a correct evaluation during imaging follow-up, it is necessary to use a reliable method for the assessment of renal lesions, represented by the Bosniak classification system. This classification was initially developed based on contrast-enhanced CT imaging findings, and the 2019 revision proposed the inclusion of MRI features; however, the latest classification has not yet received widespread validation. Conclusions: The use of radiomics in the evaluation of renal masses is an emerging and increasingly central field with several applications such as characterizing renal masses, distinguishing RCC subtypes, monitoring response to targeted therapeutic agents, and prognosis in a metastatic context.

Role of multiparametric MRI in characterization of complicated cystic renal masses

Background

Bosniak classification improves sensitivity and specificity for malignancy among cystic renal masses characterized with MRI. The quantitative parameters derived from diffusion-weighted imaging, and contrast enhancement, can be used in distinguishing between benign and malignant cystic renal masses.

Methods

This prospective observational study included 58 patients (39 male and 19 female) with complicated cystic renal mass initially diagnosed by US or CT. All patients underwent multiparametric MRI study (Pre- and Post-Gd-enhanced T1WI, T2WI and DWI) by using 3 Tesla MRI scanner. Each cystic renal lesion was assigned a category based on Bosniak classification. Demographic data were recorded. ADC ratio, dynamic enhancement parameters in both corticomedullary and nephrographic phases as well as absolute washout were calculated and compared using ROC curve analysis.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of the multiparametric MRI in categorization of cystic renal masses according to Bosniak classification version 2019 were 90.32%, 100%, 100%, 90% and 94.83%, respectively, which was higher compared to biparametric MRI and conventional MRI.

Conclusions

Multiparametric MRI can be utilized to confidently evaluate cystic renal masses, overcoming the traditional limitations of overlapping morphological imaging features. Quantitative parameters derived from multiparametric MRI allow better evaluation of complex cystic renal tumors to distinguish between benign and malignant complex cystic renal lesions.

Quantitative 3-tesla multiparametric MRI in differentiation between renal cell carcinoma subtypes

Background

MRI provides several distinct quantitative parameters that may better differentiate renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), chemical shift signal intensity index (SII), and contrast enhancement in differentiation between different subtypes of renal cell carcinoma.

Results

There were 63 RCC as regard surgical histopathological analysis: 43 clear cell (ccRCC), 12 papillary (pRCC), and 8 chromophobe (cbRCC). The mean ADC ratio for ccRCC (0.75 ± 0.13) was significantly higher than that of pRCC (0.46 ± 0.12, P < 0.001) and cbRCC (0.41 ± 0.15, P < 0.001). The mean ADC value for ccRCC (1.56 ± 0.27 × 10−3 mm2/s) was significantly higher than that of pRCC (0.96 ± 0.25 × 10−3 mm2/s, P < 0.001) and cbRCC (0.89 ± 0.29 × 10−3 mm2/s, P < 0.001). The mean SII of pRCC (1.49 ± 0.04) was significantly higher than that of ccRCC (0.93 ± 0.01, P < 0.001) and cbRCC (1.01 ± 0.16, P < 0.001). The ccRCC absolute corticomedullary enhancement (196.7 ± 81.6) was significantly greater than that of cbRCC (177.8 ± 77.7, P < 0.001) and pRCC (164.3 ± 84.6, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that multiparametric MRI is able to afford some quantitative features such as ADC ratio, SII, and absolute corticomedullary enhancement which can be used to accurately distinguish different subtypes of renal cell carcinoma.

Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging were retrospectively evaluated. The standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated and compared between high-grade and low-grade ccRCC using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for all parameters.

RESULTS

ADC, D and MD values were significantly lower for high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). MK values were significantly higher in high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). However, D* and f were not significantly difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). MD had the largest area under the curve (AUC = 0.888), followed by ADC (AUC = 0.796), D (AUC = 0.780), MK (AUC = 0.736), f (AUC = 0.582), and D*(AUC = 0.533).

CONCLUSION

Diffusion-related parameters (D, ADC, MD, and MK) were able to significantly distinguish between low- and high-grade ccRCC. However, perfusion-related parameters (D* and f) were unable to separate high- and low-grade ccRCC. MD may be the most promising parameter for grading ccRCC in the clinic.

Diagnostic test accuracy of ADC values for identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of renal tumor subtypes and meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of ADC for differentiation of localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from other renal tumor types.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published until May 1, 2019, that reported ADC values of renal tumors. Methodological quality was evaluated. For the meta-analysis on diagnostic test accuracy of ADC for differentiation of ccRCC from other renal lesions, we applied a bivariate random-effects model and compared two subgroups of ADC measurement with vs. without cystic and necrotic areas.

RESULTS

We included 48 studies (2588 lesions) in the systematic review and 13 studies (1126 lesions) in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in ADC of renal parenchyma using b values of 0-800 vs. 0-1000 (p = 0.08). ADC measured on selected portions (sADC) excluding cystic and necrotic areas differed significantly from whole-lesion ADC (wADC) (p = 0.002). Compared to ccRCC, minimal-fat angiomyolipoma, papillary RCC, and chromophobe RCC showed significantly lower sADC while oncocytoma exhibited higher sADC. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity to differentiate ccRCC from other tumors were 80% (95% CI, 0.76-0.88) and 78% (95% CI, 0.64-0.89), respectively, for sADC and 77% (95% CI, 0.59-0.90) and 77% (95% CI, 0.69-0.86) for wADC. sADC offered a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve than wADC (0.852 vs. 0.785, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

ADC values of kidney tumors that exclude cystic or necrotic areas more accurately differentiate ccRCC from other renal tumor types than whole-lesion ADC values.

KEY POINTS

• Selective ADC of renal tumors, excluding cystic and necrotic areas, provides better discriminatory ability than whole-lesion ADC to differentiate clear cell RCC from other renal lesions, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.852 vs. 0.785, respectively (p = 0.02). • Selective ADC of renal masses provides moderate sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 78%, respectively, for differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, oncocytoma, and minimal-fat angiomyolipoma. • Selective ADC excluding cystic and necrotic areas are preferable to whole-lesion ADC as an additional tool to multiphasic MRI to differentiate clear cell RCC from other renal lesions whether the highest b value is 800 or 1000.

Imaging protocols for renal multiparametric MRI and MR urography: results of a consensus conference from the French Society of Genitourinary Imaging

OBJECTIVES

To develop technical guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging aimed at characterising renal masses (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, mpMRI) and at imaging the bladder and upper urinary tract (magnetic resonance urography, MRU).

METHODS

The French Society of Genitourinary Imaging organised a Delphi consensus conference with a two-round Delphi survey followed by a face-to-face meeting. Two separate questionnaires were issued for renal mpMRI and for MRU. Consensus was strictly defined using a priori criteria.

RESULTS

Forty-two expert uroradiologists completed both survey rounds with no attrition between the rounds. Fifty-six of 84 (67%) statements of the mpMRI questionnaire and 44/71 (62%) statements of the MRU questionnaire reached final consensus. For mpMRI, there was consensus that no injection of furosemide was needed and that the imaging protocol should include T2-weighted imaging, dual chemical shift imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (use of multiple b-values; maximal b-value, 1000 s/mm²) and fat-saturated single-bolus multiphase (unenhanced, corticomedullary, nephrographic) contrast-enhanced imaging; late imaging (more than 10 min after injection) was judged optional. For MRU, the patients should void their bladder before the examination. The protocol must include T2-weighted imaging, anatomical fast T1/T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (use of multiple b-values; maximal b-value, 1000 s/mm²) and fat-saturated single-bolus multiphase (unenhanced, corticomedullary, nephrographic, excretory) contrast-enhanced imaging. An intravenous injection of furosemide is mandatory before the injection of contrast medium. Heavily T2-weighted cholangiopancreatography-like imaging was judged optional.

CONCLUSION

This expert-based consensus conference provides recommendations to standardise magnetic resonance imaging of kidneys, ureter and bladder.

KEY POINTS

• Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) aims at characterising renal masses; magnetic resonance urography (MRU) aims at imaging the urinary bladder and the collecting systems. • For mpMRI, no injection of furosemide is needed. • For MRU, an intravenous injection of furosemide is mandatory before the injection of contrast medium; heavily T2-weighted cholangiopancreatography-like imaging is optional.

Needle track seeding in renal mass biopsies

A review and analysis of the literature demonstrates that needle track seeding in renal mass biopsy has been reported 16 times. This complication occurs almost exclusively among patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. The incidence is associated with multiple punctures of the mass, the use of core needles of ≥20 gauge, and lack of a coaxial sheath. Needle tract seeding may be associated with tumor upstaging and a worse prognosis. Fine-needle aspiration has a significantly lower rate of needle track seeding compared with large core needle biopsy (>20-gauge needle). A more formalized risk-based system for interpreting renal mass fine-needle aspiration may be useful as clinicians choose among an increasing number of therapeutic options.