Small pancreatic ductal carcinomas on triple-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography: enhanced rims and the pathologic correlation

Rim enhancement of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: investigating the relationship with DCE-MRI-based radiomics and next-generation sequencing

Purpose

To identify the clinical and genetic variables associated with rim enhancement of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to develop a dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI-based radiomics model for predicting the genetic status from next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Materials and methods

Patients with PDAC, who underwent pretreatment pancreatic DCE-MRI between November 2019 and July 2021, were eligible in this prospective study. Two radiologists evaluated presence of rim enhancement in PDAC, a known radiological prognostic indicator, on DCE MRI. NGS was conducted for the tissue from the lesion. The Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were employed to identify clinical and genetic variables associated with rim enhancement in PDAC. For continuous variables predicting rim enhancement, the cutoff value was set based on the Youden's index from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiomics features were extracted from a volume-of-interest of PDAC on four DCE maps (Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and iAUC). A random forest (RF) model was constructed using 10 selected radiomics features from a pool of 392 original features. This model aimed to predict the status of significant NGS variables associated with rim enhancement. The performance of the model was validated using test set.

Results

A total of 55 patients (32 men; median age 71 years) were randomly assigned to the training (n = 41) and test (n = 14) sets. In the training set, KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 mutation rates were 92.3%, 61.8%, 14.5%, and 9.1%, respectively. Tumor size and KRAS variant allele frequency (VAF) differed between rim-enhancing (n = 12) and nonrim-enhancing (n = 29) PDACs with a cutoff of 17.22%. The RF model's average AUC from 10-fold cross-validation for predicting KRAS VAF status was 0.698. In the test set comprising 6 tumors with low KRAS VAF and 8 with high KRAS VAF, the RF model's AUC reached 1.000, achieving a sensitivity of 75.0%, specificity of 100% and accuracy of 87.5%.

Conclusion

Rim enhancement of PDAC is associated with KRAS VAF derived from NGS-based genetic information. For predicting the KRAS VAF status in PDAC, a radiomics model based on DCE maps showed promising results.

Retrospective evaluation of venous phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography images in patients who developed pancreatic adenocarcinomas after treatment for nonpancreatic primary cancer

Objectives:

To clarify venous phase contrast-enhanced CT findings in early pancreatic adenocarcinomas by retrospectively evaluating CT images of pancreatic adenocarcinomas that developed during follow-up after treatment for non-pancreatic cancers.

Methods:

The study cohort comprised six patients who developed pancreatic adenocarcinomas between April 2005 and April 2020 during follow-up after treatment for non-pancreatic primary cancers. Two radiologists retrospectively evaluated CT images and reached consensus on previously reported CT findings that were suggestive of small pancreatic adenocarcinomas; namely pancreatic duct interruption and dilatation, pancreatic parenchymal atrophy, focal hypoattenuated areas, and appearance of cystic lesions. Time intervals between the first CT with these suggestive findings and the latest pre-operative CT were recorded. Doubling times were calculated in patients with hypoattenuated areas on initial CT scans.

Results:

Small (<10 mm) focal hypoattenuated areas with (n = 2) or without rim enhancement (n = 1) were identified on initial CT images of three patients. Pancreatic duct interruption and dilatation, pancreatic parenchymal atrophy, and cystic lesion were identified in two, one and one patient, respectively. Time intervals between initial and latest preoperative CT examination were 6–19 months (median, 14.5 months). Tumor doubling time according to CT findings was calculated as 46–407 days (median 106 days).

Conclusion:

Venous phase contrast-enhanced CT can provide findings that are suggestive of early pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pancreatic phase contrast-enhanced CT should therefore be performed in patients with such findings with the aim of early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Advances in knowledge:

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma can develop subsequently in patients with non-pancreatic malignancies. Patients with non-pancreatic cancers are often followed up with monophasic contrast-enhanced CT in venous phase timing. Venous phase contrast-enhanced CT can provide some findings suggestive of early pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Knowledge of these findings is important for early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.