Early response evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy with PET/MRI to predict resectability in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

Baseline and interim [18F]FDG-PET/MRI to assess treatment response and survival in patients with M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by curative-intent therapy

BACKGROUND

To investigate the value of [18F]FDG-PET/MRI in predicting treatment response and survival in patients with primary M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma received [18F]FDG-PET/MRI at baseline and during neoadjuvant or definitive chemoradiotherapy. The treatment response was classified according to the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors 1.1. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses to assess the association between PET/MRI parameters and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

We included 40 M0 patients in the final analysis. The volume transfer constant (Ktrans) from baseline PET/MRI (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.688, P = 0.034) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) from baseline PET/MRI (AUC = 0.723, P = 0.006) or interim PET/MRI (AUC = 0.853, P < 0.001) showed acceptable AUC for predicting treatment response. The TLG from interim PET/MRI (interim TLG, P < 0.001) and extracellular volume fraction (Ve) on interim PET/MRI (interim Ve, P = 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS. Baseline Ve (P = 0.044) and interim TLG (P = 0.004) were significant predictors of PFS. The c-indices of the prognostic models combining interim TLG with Ve for predicting OS, and baseline Ve and interim TLG for predicting PFS were 0.784 and 0.699, respectively. These values were significantly higher than the corresponding c-indices of the TNM staging system (P = 0.002 and P = 0.047, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the baseline and interim [18F]FDG-PET/MRI qualitative imaging parameters aids in predicting the prognosis of patients with M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT05855291 and NCT05855278).

Does radiomics play a role in the diagnosis, staging and re-staging of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma?

Radiomics is an emerging field of investigation in medicine consisting in the extraction of quantitative features from conventional medical images and exploring their potentials in improving diagnosis, prognosis and outcome prediction after therapy. Clinical applications are still limited, mostly due to reproducibility and repeatability issues as well as to limited interpretability of predictive radiomic-based features/signatures. In the specific case of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, the expectancies are particularly high, mainly due to its increasing incidence and to the limited performance of conventional imaging techniques in assessing correct diagnosis and accurate pre-surgical tumor characterization. Accordingly, current literature was reviewed, emphasizing the methodological quality. In addition, papers were scored according to the Radiomic Quality Score (RQS), weighting more the clinical applicability and generalizability of the resulting models. According to the criteria of the search, only two papers were retained: the resulting technical quality was relatively high for both, while the corresponding RQS were 15 and 19 (on a scale of 31). Although the potentials of radiomics in the setting of GEJ adenocarcinoma are relevant, they remain largely unexplored, warranting an urgent need of high-quality, possibly prospective, multicenter studies.

The value proposition of integrative diagnostics for (early) detection of cancer. On behalf of the EFLM interdisciplinary Task and Finish Group "CNAPS/CTC for early detection of cancer"

Disruptive imaging and laboratory technologies can improve clinical decision processes and outcomes in oncology. However, certain obstacles must be overcome before these technologies can be fully implemented as part of the standard for care. An integrative diagnostic approach represents a unique opportunity to unleash the full diagnostic potential and paves the way towards personalized cancer diagnostics. To meet this demand, an interdisciplinary Task Force of the EFLM was initiated as a consequence of an EFLM/ESR during the CELME 2019 meeting in order to evaluate the clinical value of CNAPS/CTC (circulating nucleic acids in plasma and serum/circulating tumor cells) in early detection of cancer. Here, an overview of current disruptive techniques, their clinical implications and potential value of an integrative diagnostic approach is provided. Furthermore, requirements such as the establishment of diagnostic tumor boards, development of adequate software solutions and a change of mindset towards a new generation of diagnosticians providing actionable health information are presented. This development has the potential to elevate the position and clinical recognition of diagnosticians.

Initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MRI

BACKGROUND

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) may improve cancer staging by combining sensitive cancer detection with high-contrast resolution and detail. We compared the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI to 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer. Following ethical approval and informed consent, participants with newly diagnosed primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer were enrolled. Exclusions included prior/concurrent malignancy. Following 324 ± 28 MBq 18F-FDG administration and 60-min uptake, PET/CT was performed, immediately followed by integrated PET/MRI from skull base to mid-thigh. PET/CT was interpreted by two dual-accredited nuclear medicine physicians and PET/MRI by a dual-accredited nuclear medicine physician/radiologist and cancer radiologist in consensus. Per-participant staging was compared with the tumour board consensus staging using the McNemar test, with statistical significance at 5%.

RESULTS

Out of 26 participants, 22 (20 males; mean ± SD age 68.8 ± 8.7 years) completed 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI. Compared to the tumour board, the primary tumour was staged concordantly in 55% (12/22) with PET/MRI and 36% (8/22) with PET/CT; the nodal stage was concordant in 45% (10/22) with PET/MRI and 50% (11/22) with PET/CT. There was no statistical difference in PET/CT and PET/MRI staging performance (p > 0.05, for T and N staging). The staging of distant metastases was concordant with the tumour board in 95% (21/22) with both PET/MRI and PET/CT. Of participants with distant metastatic disease, PET/MRI detected additional metastases in 30% (3/10).

CONCLUSION

In this preliminary study, compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/MRI showed non-significant higher concordance with T-staging, but no difference with N or M-staging. Additional metastases detected by 18F-FDG PET/MRI may be of additive clinical value.

Gastrointestinal Applications of Iodine Quantification Using Dual-Energy CT: A Systematic Review

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can estimate tissue vascularity and perfusion via iodine quantification. The aim of this systematic review was to outline current and emerging clinical applications of iodine quantification within the gastrointestinal tract using DECT. The search was conducted with three databases: EMBASE, Pubmed and The Cochrane Library. This identified 449 studies after duplicate removal. From a total of 570 selected studies, 30 studies were enrolled for the systematic review. The studies were categorized into four main topics: gastric tumors (12 studies), colorectal tumors (8 studies), Crohn’s disease (4 studies) and miscellaneous applications (6 studies). Findings included a significant difference in iodine concentration (IC) measurements in perigastric fat between T1–3 vs. T4 stage gastric cancer, poorly and well differentiated gastric and colorectal cancer, responders vs. non-responders following chemo- or chemoradiotherapy treatment among cancer patients, and a positive correlation between IC and Crohn’s disease activity. In conclusion, iodine quantification with DECT may be used preoperatively in cancer imaging as well as for monitoring treatment response. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the capabilities and limitations of DECT in splanchnic flow.

Positron Emission Tomography-Based Response to Target and Immunotherapies in Oncology

2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) is a promising tool to support the evaluation of response to either target therapies or immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors both in clinical trials and, in selected patients, at the single patient's level. The present review aims to discuss available evidence related to the use of [¹⁸F]FDG PET (Positron Emission Tomography) to evaluate the response to target therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Criteria proposed for the standardization of the definition of the PET-based response and complementary value with respect to morphological imaging are commented on. The use of PET-based assessment of the response through metabolic pathways other than glucose metabolism is also relevant in the framework of personalized cancer treatment. A brief discussion of the preliminary evidence for the use of non-FDG PET tracers in the evaluation of the response to new therapies is also provided.