1
|
He K, Wan D, Li S, Yuan G, Gao M, Han Y, Li Z, Hu D, Meng X, Niu Y. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance urography for measuring split kidney function in pediatric patients with hydronephrosis: comparison with renal scintigraphy. Pediatr Nephrol 2024; 39:1447-1457. [PMID: 38041747 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-06224-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Split kidney function (SKF) is critical for treatment decision in pediatric patients with hydronephrosis and is commonly measured using renal scintigraphy (RS). Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance urography (NCE-MRU) is increasingly used in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using NCE-MRU as an alternative to estimate SKF in pediatric patients with hydronephrosis, compared to RS. METHODS Seventy-five pediatric patients with hydronephrosis were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent NCE-MRU and RS within 2 weeks. Kidney parenchyma volume (KPV) and texture analysis parameters were obtained from T2-weighted (T2WI) in NCE-MRU. The calculated split KPV (SKPV) percent and texture analysis parameters percent of left kidney were compared with the RS-determined SKF. RESULTS SKPV showed a significant positive correlation with SKF (r = 0.88, p < 0.001), while inhomogeneity was negatively correlated with SKF (r = - 0.68, p < 0.001). The uncorrected and corrected prediction models of SKF were established using simple and multiple linear regression. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated good agreement of both predictive models. The residual sum of squares of the corrected prediction model was lower than that of the uncorrected model (0.283 vs. 0.314) but not statistically significant (p = 0.662). Subgroup analysis based on different MR machines showed correlation coefficients of 0.85, 0.95, and 0.94 between SKF and SKPV for three different scanners, respectively (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS NCE-MRU can be used as an alternative method for estimating SKF in pediatric patients with hydronephrosis when comparing with RS. Specifically, SKPV proves to be a simple and universally applicable indicator for predicting SKF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kangwen He
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Dongyi Wan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Shichao Li
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Guanjie Yuan
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Mengmeng Gao
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yunfeng Han
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Daoyu Hu
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaoyan Meng
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| | - Yonghua Niu
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steden K, Figiel J, Hoyer J, Kamalanabhaiah SR. Kidney Hypertrophy in Living Kidney Donors and Their Corresponding Recipients. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:627-631. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.11.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
3
|
Kon M, Nakamura M, Moriya K, Nishimura Y, Hirata Y, Nishida M, Higuchi M, Kitta T, Shinohara N. What are the Optimal Renal Ultrasound Parameters for Detecting Small Kidney in Young Children? Res Rep Urol 2021; 13:767-772. [PMID: 34737981 PMCID: PMC8558043 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s318793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Recent guidelines do not recommend routine screening of vesicoureteral reflux after a first febrile urinary tract infection in children without abnormal findings on ultrasound or atypical/recurrent urinary tract infection. Currently, there are no clear ultrasonographic parameters for detecting abnormalities in renal size, especially in young children. The aim of the present study was to determine an optimal cutoff value for detecting small kidney in children without apparent congenital anomalies except vesicoureteral reflux by retrospective chart review. Patients and Methods Children aged ≤3 years who had undergone nuclear renal scans and ultrasound were enrolled. Small kidney was defined as split renal function of <40%. Optimal cutoff values of various ultrasonographic parameters for detecting small kidney were calculated. Results Of the 69 children included in the present study, small kidney was identified in 20. There was a significant difference in renal size between each kidney in patients with small kidney, whereas there was no significant difference in those without small kidney. With a ratio of estimated renal area of 74.26%, maximum area under the curve with the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy rate were obtained. In addition, simple measurement of renal length with a cutoff of 4.97 cm showed high specificity comparable with estimated renal area. Conclusion Small kidney may be screened by two-dimensional measurement on ultrasonographic examination, even in young children. With the cutoff described, risk stratification or an individualized approach may be possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masafumi Kon
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Michiko Nakamura
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kimihiko Moriya
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoko Nishimura
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yurie Hirata
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Mutsumi Nishida
- Diagnostic Center for Sonography and Division of Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Madoka Higuchi
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takeya Kitta
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Nobuo Shinohara
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Branchereau J, Prudhomme T, Bessede T, Verhoest G, Boissier R, Culty T, Matillon X, Defortescu G, Sallusto F, Terrier N, Drouin S, Karam G, Badet L, Timsit MO. [Living donor nephrectomy: The French guidelines from CTAFU]. Prog Urol 2021; 31:50-56. [PMID: 33423748 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To propose surgical recommendations for living donor nephrectomy. METHOD Following a systematic approach, a review of the literature (Medline) was conducted by the CTAFU regarding functional and anatomical assessment of kidney donors, including which side the kidney should be harvested from. Distinct surgical techniques and approaches were evaluated. References were considered with a predefined process to propose recommendations with the corresponding levels of evidence. RESULTS The recommendations clarify the legal and regulatory framework for kidney donation in France. A rigorous assessment of the donor is one of the essential prerequisites for donor safety. The impact of nephrectomy on kidney function needs to be anticipated. In case of modal vascularization of both kidneys without a relative difference in function or urologic abnormality, removal of the left kidney is the preferred choice to favor a longer vein. Mini-invasive approaches for nephrectomy provide faster donor recovery, less donor pain and shorter hospital stay than open surgery. CONCLUSION These French recommendations must contribute to improving surgical management of candidates for kidney donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Branchereau
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU de Nantes, 5, allée de lÎle-Gloriette, 44093 Nantes cedex 01, France
| | - T Prudhomme
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU de Toulouse, avenue du Pr-Jean-Poulhès, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - T Bessede
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, hôpital de Bicêtre, université de Paris-Saclay, 78, rue du Général-Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - G Verhoest
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - R Boissier
- Service d'urologie et transplantation, hôpital de La Conception, université Aix-Marseille, 47, boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - T Culty
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49100 Angers, France
| | - X Matillon
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - G Defortescu
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU Rouen, 37, boulevard Gambetta, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - F Sallusto
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU de Toulouse, avenue du Pr-Jean-Poulhès, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - N Terrier
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, boulevard de la Chantourne, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - S Drouin
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, université Paris Sorbonne, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - G Karam
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU de Nantes, 5, allée de lÎle-Gloriette, 44093 Nantes cedex 01, France
| | - L Badet
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - M-O Timsit
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; PARCC, INSERM, équipe labellisée par la Ligue Contre le Cancer, 56, rue Leblanc, université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, hôpital Necker, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lal H, Singh A, Prasad R, Yadav P, Akhtar J, Barai S, Mishra P, Bhadauria D, Kaul A, Prasad N, Verma P. Determination of split renal function in voluntary renal donors by multidetector computed tomography and nuclear renography: How well do they correlate? SA J Radiol 2021; 25:2009. [PMID: 33824742 PMCID: PMC8008088 DOI: 10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of computed tomography (CT) for estimation of split renal function (SRF) has been reported previously. However, most of these studies have small samples, and many do not account for the renal attenuation at CT. Objective The aim of this study was to compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) volumetry-attenuation-based SRF with that obtained via Tc99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) renal scintigraphy in voluntary renal donors. Methods Between January 2017 and January 2020, 526 voluntary renal donors were enrolled prospectively. All donors underwent contrast CT and DTPA scan before surgery. The semiautomatic region of interest (ROI) tool was applied slice by slice on axial CT images acquired in the arterial phase. The renal contour was drawn semiautomatically with mouse clicks around the renal parenchyma, and the renal volume was ascertained. Using renal volume and attenuation, SRF was determined and compared with results obtained at DTPA imaging. Results The mean age was 44.91 ± 10.97 years (mean ± s.d.). There was no significant difference in SRF based on DTPA and MDCT volumetry for the left kidney (49.18% ± 3.40% vs. 49.15% ± 3.38%, p = 0.540) and for the right kidney (50.82% ± 3.40% vs. 50.86% ± 3.39%, p = 0.358). A very good correlation was observed between the two methods for the left kidney (r = 0.953, p = 0.000) and the right kidney (r = 0.955, p = 0.000). On simple linear regression analysis, 90.8% of DTPA SRF values for the left kidney and 91.3% of DTPA SRF values for the right kidney could be predicted correctly using the corresponding MDCT SRF values. Conclusion MDCT volumetry-attenuation-derived estimation of SRF for living renal donors could be an alternative to renal scintigraphy-based SRF estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hira Lal
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Anuradha Singh
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Raghunandan Prasad
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Priyank Yadav
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Faculty Health Sciences, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Javed Akhtar
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Sukanta Barai
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Prabhakar Mishra
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Dharmendra Bhadauria
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Anupma Kaul
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Narayan Prasad
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Pragati Verma
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fiev D, Proskura A, Khokhlachev S, Taratkin M, Borisov V, Chernenkiy M, Gabdulina S, Leonard SP, Alyaev Y, Rivas JG, Enikeev D, Glybochko P. A prospective study of novel mathematical analysis of the contrast-enhanced computed tomography vs renal scintigraphy in renal function evaluation. Eur J Radiol 2020; 130:109169. [PMID: 32663764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE whilst renal scintigraphy (RS) can be associated with interobserver variability, it remains the standard method of evaluating split renal function. AIM to compare the efficacy of the novel technique of kidney function assessment and renal scintigraphy. METHOD for this prospective single-arm study we recruited patients who were recommended dynamic renal scintigraphy with 99mTc-DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentacetate). After scintigraphy, mathematical analysis of computed tomography (MACT) was done in all patients, by a single person (SK) blinded to RS results. RESULTS the study included a total of 97 patients with mean age of 50.9 (range, 23-78) years. From this sample, 65 were females and 32 males. All patients underwent both RS and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for further MACT in 2016-2018. CT results were found to be similar to renal scintigraphy results with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.945 (р < 0.001). Substantial similarities in renal plasma flow for both kidneys were also observed (0.815, р < 0.001). CONCLUSION MACT proved feasible, effective and safe in estimating renal function. Its results are closely correlated with RS findings and could be easily integrated into surgical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry Fiev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexandra Proskura
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Khokhlachev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mark Taratkin
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; EAU Section on Urological Imaging, Netherlands; Young Academic Urologists, EAU, Netherlands
| | | | - Mikhail Chernenkiy
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Svetlana Gabdulina
- Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Stephen Pax Leonard
- Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yuriy Alyaev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; EAU Section on Uro-technology, Netherlands.
| | - Petr Glybochko
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|