1
|
Kamran R, Chan C, Jackman VA, Lee AC, Suk Y, Jackman L, Ditkofsky N, Nguyen E, Probyn L, Doria AS. Transgender and Gender Diverse Medical Education in Radiology: A Systematic Review. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:4272-4285. [PMID: 39304375 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Physicians report a lack of Transgender and Gender Diverse (TGD) health competency for medical imaging. This knowledge gap contributes to negative medical imaging experiences, discrimination, stigma, and diagnostic errors for TGD individuals. Medical education plays an important role in improving this. However, the current landscape and gaps in TGD medical education in radiology is underexplored. We aimed to fill the knowledge gap on the current state of TGD medical education in radiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS A PRISMA and SWiM guideline-compliant systematic review on TGD medical education in radiology was performed. Four databases were searched: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to May 13, 2024. Article screening and extraction occurred independently and in duplicate. Narrative synthesis was performed on TGD medical education material in radiology, educational recommendations, barriers/enablers to education, and current guidelines. RESULTS A total of 4360 records were identified with 76 articles included. Most articles (52, 68%) were from the United States. Most articles aimed to provide recommendations for TGD medical education in radiology (53, 69.7%). Some articles focused on developing medical education (7, 9.2%), evaluating medical education (7, 9.2%), evaluating guidelines (8, 10.5%), or developing guidelines (3, 4%). Identified TGD medical education in radiology is inconsistent, focusing on terminology guides, clinical scenarios, and cultural sensitivity workshops. Many current guidelines for TGD medical imaging were developed through extrapolation of guidance for cisgender patients, demonstrating limited relevance and meaningfulness for TGD patients. CONCLUSION This systematic review identifies a need to develop consistent TGD medical educational material in radiology in partnership with TGD patients to cover patient perspectives and guidance for medical imaging considerations. Results can be used to identify TGD medical education resources in radiology which may be helpful, and guide development of future medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhshan Kamran
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Cynthia Chan
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Victoria Anne Jackman
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Ann C Lee
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yujin Suk
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liam Jackman
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Noah Ditkofsky
- Department of Medical Imaging, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elsie Nguyen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Linda Probyn
- Department of Medical Imaging, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea S Doria
- Department of Medical Imaging, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hegde S, Carroll EF, Doo FX, Drzewiecki B, Jensen KK, Sertic M, Pierce TT. Imaging the acute complications of gender-affirming surgeries: a primer for radiologists in the emergency setting. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:2812-2832. [PMID: 38832942 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04385-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is increasingly being performed. GAS is tailored to the patient leading to a diverse spectrum of radiologic post-operative findings. Radiologists who are unfamiliar with expected anatomic alterations after GAS may misdiagnose important complications leading to adverse patient outcomes. This collaborative multi-institutional review aims to: Describe relevant embryology and native anatomy. Describe relevant Gender-Affirming Surgery (GAS) techniques and expected neo-anatomy with associated complications, including common terminology. Review expected imaging appearance of neo-anatomy/postoperative findings. Review multi-modality [ultrasound, plain film, retrograde urethrogram, computed tomography] emergent imaging findings. Understand unique patient evaluation and imaging protocol considerations in the GAS population. Discuss pearls and pitfalls of imaging in the acute post-GAS setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhi Hegde
- Department of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research and Translation (CURT), Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Evelyn F Carroll
- Breast Imaging/Hospital and Emergency Radiology Divisions, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Florence X Doo
- Body/Abdominal Imaging Division, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Beth Drzewiecki
- Pediatric Surgical Services (MGfC), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kyle K Jensen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Madeleine Sertic
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Theodore T Pierce
- Department of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research and Translation (CURT), Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sozio SJ, Soliman A, Shah K, Schonfeld S, Kempf J. Educating Radiology Stakeholders on Relevant Health Issues and Terminology Regarding LGBTQIA+ Patients in 2023. Acad Radiol 2023; 30:2422-2428. [PMID: 37311679 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Over 20% of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Queer or Questioning, Intersex, Asexual or Ally, and more (LGBTQIA+) community reports experiencing discrimination upon accessing health care, causing many to defer access to care and resulting in poorer outcomes. While members of this community routinely undergo imaging studies, little formal education exists within the field of radiology to review the unique health care needs of this population and the specific relevance to imaging, in addition to actionable methods to promote inclusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 1-hour educational conference was held for a cohort of radiology resident physicians at our institution, in which topics including LGBTQIA+ health care disparities, clinical nuances relevant to the field of radiology, and actionable suggestions that both academic and private-practice centers can adopt to foster inclusion were presented. All attendees were required to complete a 12-question, multiple-choice preconference and postconference examination. RESULTS Median prelecture and postlecture quiz scores for four first-year radiology residents were 29% and 75%, for two second-year radiology residents were 29% and 63%, for two third-year radiology residents were 17% and 71%, and for three fourth-year radiology residents were 42% and 80%. CONCLUSION Multiple areas of opportunity to foster LGBTQIA+ inclusion at the provider and administration levels currently exist throughout the field of radiology. A radiology-focused education module regarding clinical nuances, health care inequities, and ways to foster an inclusive environment with the LGBTQIA+ community is an effective way to promote learner knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Sozio
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
| | - Andrew Soliman
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Kush Shah
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Steven Schonfeld
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Jeffrey Kempf
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Iv Kyrazis CB, Stein EB, Carroll EF, Crissman HP, Kirkpatrick DL, Wasnik AP, Zavaletta V, Maturen KE. Imaging Care for Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients: Best Practices and Recommendations. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220124. [PMID: 36602923 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people experience health disparities, and many avoid necessary medical care because of fears of discrimination or mistreatment. Disparate care is further compounded by limited understanding of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and gender-affirming surgery among the medical community. Specific to radiology, TGD patients report more negative imaging experiences than negative general health encounters, highlighting the need for guidance and best practices for inclusive imaging care. A patient's imaging journey provides numerous opportunities for improvement. Inclusive practice in a radiology department starts with ordering and scheduling the examination, facilitated by staff education on appropriate use of a patient's chosen name, gender identity, and pronouns. Contemporary electronic health record systems have the capacity for recording detailed sexual orientation and gender identity data, but staff must be trained to solicit and use this information. A welcoming environment can help TGD patients to feel safe during the imaging experience and may include institutional nondiscrimination policies, gender-neutral signage, and all-gender single-user dressing rooms and bathrooms. Image acquisition should be performed using trauma-informed and patient-centered care. Finally, radiologists should be aware of reporting considerations for TGD patients, such as avoiding the use of gender in reports when it is not medically relevant and using precise, respectful language for findings related to GAHT and gender-affirming surgical procedures. As a field, radiology has a range of opportunities for improving care delivery for TGD patients, and the authors summarize recommended best practices. See the invited commentary by Stowell in this issue. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Crysta B Iv Kyrazis
- From the Department of Radiology (C.B.I.K. [she/her]), E.B.S. [she/her], D.L.K. [he, him], A.P.W. [he, him], K.E.M. [she/her]) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.P.C. [she/her], K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B1 D502, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (E.F.C. [she/her]); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (V.Z. [they/them])
| | - Erica B Stein
- From the Department of Radiology (C.B.I.K. [she/her]), E.B.S. [she/her], D.L.K. [he, him], A.P.W. [he, him], K.E.M. [she/her]) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.P.C. [she/her], K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B1 D502, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (E.F.C. [she/her]); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (V.Z. [they/them])
| | - Evelyn F Carroll
- From the Department of Radiology (C.B.I.K. [she/her]), E.B.S. [she/her], D.L.K. [he, him], A.P.W. [he, him], K.E.M. [she/her]) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.P.C. [she/her], K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B1 D502, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (E.F.C. [she/her]); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (V.Z. [they/them])
| | - Halley P Crissman
- From the Department of Radiology (C.B.I.K. [she/her]), E.B.S. [she/her], D.L.K. [he, him], A.P.W. [he, him], K.E.M. [she/her]) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.P.C. [she/her], K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B1 D502, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (E.F.C. [she/her]); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (V.Z. [they/them])
| | - Daniel L Kirkpatrick
- From the Department of Radiology (C.B.I.K. [she/her]), E.B.S. [she/her], D.L.K. [he, him], A.P.W. [he, him], K.E.M. [she/her]) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.P.C. [she/her], K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B1 D502, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (E.F.C. [she/her]); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (V.Z. [they/them])
| | - Ashish P Wasnik
- From the Department of Radiology (C.B.I.K. [she/her]), E.B.S. [she/her], D.L.K. [he, him], A.P.W. [he, him], K.E.M. [she/her]) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.P.C. [she/her], K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B1 D502, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (E.F.C. [she/her]); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (V.Z. [they/them])
| | - Vaz Zavaletta
- From the Department of Radiology (C.B.I.K. [she/her]), E.B.S. [she/her], D.L.K. [he, him], A.P.W. [he, him], K.E.M. [she/her]) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.P.C. [she/her], K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B1 D502, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (E.F.C. [she/her]); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (V.Z. [they/them])
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- From the Department of Radiology (C.B.I.K. [she/her]), E.B.S. [she/her], D.L.K. [he, him], A.P.W. [he, him], K.E.M. [she/her]) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.P.C. [she/her], K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B1 D502, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (E.F.C. [she/her]); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (V.Z. [they/them])
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schardein JN, Li G, Zaccarini DJ, Caza T, Nikolavsky D. Histological Evaluation of Vaginal Cavity Remnants Excised During Neourethral Stricture Repair in Transgender Men. Urology 2021; 156:296-302. [PMID: 34371062 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of patients who require vaginal cavity remnant excision and obliteration during neourethral stricture repair and to characterize the histological composition of the excised tissue. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of all transgender men who underwent neourethral stricture repair. Preoperative imaging and operative reports were reviewed to determine the presence of a vaginal cavity remnant that was excised and obliterated during neourethral reconstruction. Pathology slides were reviewed by 2 pathologists to determine if there was presence of stratified squamous epithelium consistent with vaginal tissue within the vaginal cavity remnant. RESULTS A total of 47 consecutive transgender men underwent neourethral stricture repair between January 2014 and December 2020. Of these, 18 patients (38%) with a mean age of 37 years (23-59) underwent excision and obliteration of a vaginal cavity remnant. Seventy eight percent (14/18) had a prior phalloplasty and 22% (4/18) had a prior metoidioplasty. Primary vaginectomy type was not associated with whether or not a patient had a vaginal cavity remnant (P = .12). Histological evaluation demonstrated the presence of vaginal epithelium in all vaginal cavity remnant specimens. CONCLUSION A high percentage of transgender men with neourethral strictures present with vaginal cavity remnants despite prior vaginectomy. Pathological evaluation confirms that all vaginal cavity remnant specimens contain vaginal epithelium that was either incompletely excised or regenerated. While the implications of this residual vaginal epithelium require further investigation, total removal of vaginal tissue primarily or during reconstruction is important given the risk of associated symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Guanqun Li
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | | | - Tiffany Caza
- Department of Pathology, Arkana Laboratories, Little Rock, AR
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Perry H, Fang AJ, Tsai EM, Slanetz PJ. Imaging Health and Radiology Care of Transgender Patients: A Call to Build Evidence-Based Best Practices. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:475-480. [PMID: 33663757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Transgender people have a gender identity that differs from their natal sex and experience many forms of discrimination, including within the health care field. Although transgender patients only comprise 0.6% of the adult US population, they frequently require imaging evaluation. Few published articles provide data-driven research on optimizing education of the radiology care team and delivery of inclusive and respectful imaging care to this vulnerable population; existing data suggest prior areas of success and prior areas of failure. Here, we offer specific recommendations on how radiology care team members can better serve transgender patients and begin generating much needed evidence-based best practices to improve their imaging health and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Perry
- Co-Division Chief/Medical Director of Breast Imaging, University of Vermont Medical Center, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
| | - Adam J Fang
- Division Director of Breast Imaging, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Erin M Tsai
- President, Vermont Radiological Society, University of Vermont Medical Center, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Priscilla J Slanetz
- Vice Chair of Academic Affairs and Associate Program Director, Diagnostic Radiology Residency, Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hassan O, Sun D, Jha P. Imaging in Gender Affirmation Surgery. Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:14. [PMID: 33515366 PMCID: PMC7847456 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-020-01029-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review This review summarizes recent developments in gender affirmation surgery, imaging findings in patients undergoing these surgeries, focusing on common postoperative radiologic appearances, complications, and pitfalls in interpretation. Recent Findings The imaging workup of masculinizing and feminizing genitourinary surgeries uses multiple modalities in presurgical planning and within the immediate and long-term postoperative period. CT and MRI can help identify immediate and remote postoperative complications. Fluoroscopic examinations can diagnose postoperative urethral complications after gender affirmation surgeries. Lastly, the patients can undergo imaging for unrelated acute and chronic pathology, and knowledge of these imaging findings can be very helpful. Summary Imaging plays a significant role in the care of transgender patients and, particularly, in those pursuing gender affirmation surgery. As insurance coverage expands for these surgical procedures, radiologists should be prepared to encounter, understand, and interpret pre and postoperative findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Hassan
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging and Ultrasound Section, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, box 0628, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0628, USA.
| | - Derek Sun
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging and Ultrasound Section, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, box 0628, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0628, USA
| | - Priyanka Jha
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging and Ultrasound Section, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, box 0628, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0628, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Custer T, Sayles H, Michael K. Assessing the Educational Climate: Transgender Content in Medical Imaging Curricula. JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/8756479320944930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to gather benchmark data on curricular content related to imaging of transgender patients. In addition, the intent was to explore program directors’ opinions on the need to include this content in the curriculum. Material and Methods: An online survey was emailed to all directors (n = 982) of accredited imaging programs in the United States. Results: In total, 331 (34%) program directors participated in the survey. Fifty-six percent currently do not include this content in their curriculum and 67% reported no discussion of adding the material. There was a modest and significant positive correlation between the program directors’ perceived level of knowledge, regarding imaging transgender patients, and their perceived importance of including this material in the curriculum ( r = 0.370; P < .001). Positive (55%), negative (7%), and neutral themes (38%) emerged from the qualitative data analysis. Conclusion: These findings were consistent with literature regarding a lack of curriculum specific to transgender patients. Program directors recognized the need to include this content, although barriers exist related to readiness to implement, limited faculty knowledge with the material, and lack of educational resources. Program directors are seeking strategies and resources to guide the integration of this material into the curriculum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya Custer
- Department of Medical Imaging & Therapeutic Sciences, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Harlan Sayles
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Kim Michael
- Department of Medical Imaging & Therapeutic Sciences, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nazarian M, Bluebond-Langner R, Smereka P, Zhao L, Ream J, Hindman N. Spectrum of imaging findings in gender-affirming genital surgery: Intraoperative photographs, normal post-operative anatomy, and common complications. Clin Imaging 2020; 69:63-71. [PMID: 32659682 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.06.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Gender-affirming surgery is becoming more accessible, and radiologists must be familiar with both terminology and anatomy following gender-affirming surgical procedures. This essay will review the most common gender-affirming genital surgeries, their post-operative anatomy, and common complications by providing intraoperative photographs, illustrations, and cross-sectional images. Routine radiologic imaging recommendations for transgender patients will also be reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Nazarian
- NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | | | - Paul Smereka
- NYU Langone Medical Center, 560 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | - Lee Zhao
- NYU Langone Medical Center, 222 E 41st St, New York, NY 10017, USA.
| | - Justin Ream
- NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Nicole Hindman
- NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stowell JT, Horowitz JM, Thomas S. Gender-affirming surgical techniques, complications, and imaging considerations for the abdominal radiologist. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:2036-2048. [PMID: 31915851 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02398-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Gender-affirming surgery is a group of surgical procedures that alters the physical appearance of a transgender person to resemble that socially associated with their identified gender. Masculinization and feminization surgeries include chest and breast surgery as well as genital reconstruction. The genital reconstruction surgeries have unique anatomic imaging features and are associated with complications that may require radiologic evaluation. This review provides a review of the imaging anatomy, expected findings, and complications associated with gender-affirming surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin T Stowell
- Department and Institution Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jeanne M Horowitz
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Stephen Thomas
- Department of Radiology, Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group, San Diego, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|