Prior iterative reconstruction (PIR) to lower radiation dose and preserve radiologist performance for multiphase liver CT: a multi-reader pilot study

Iterative Reconstruction: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives

ABSTRACT

Image reconstruction processing in computed tomography (CT) has evolved tremendously since its creation, succeeding at optimizing radiation dose while maintaining adequate image quality. Computed tomography vendors have developed and implemented various technical advances, such as automatic noise reduction filters, automatic exposure control, and refined imaging reconstruction algorithms.Focusing on imaging reconstruction, filtered back-projection has represented the standard reconstruction algorithm for over 3 decades, obtaining adequate image quality at standard radiation dose exposures. To overcome filtered back-projection reconstruction flaws in low-dose CT data sets, advanced iterative reconstruction algorithms consisting of either backward projection or both backward and forward projections have been developed, with the goal to enable low-dose CT acquisitions with high image quality. Iterative reconstruction techniques play a key role in routine workflow implementation (eg, screening protocols, vascular and pediatric applications), in quantitative CT imaging applications, and in dose exposure limitation in oncologic patients.Therefore, this review aims to provide an overview of the technical principles and the main clinical application of iterative reconstruction algorithms, focusing on the strengths and weaknesses, in addition to integrating future perspectives in the new era of artificial intelligence.

Diagnostic Performance in Low- and High-Contrast Tasks of an Image-Based Denoising Algorithm Applied to Radiation Dose-Reduced Multiphase Abdominal CT Examinations

BACKGROUND. Anatomic redundancy between phases can be used to achieve denoising of multiphase CT examinations. A limitation of iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques is that they generally require use of CT projection data. A frequency-split multi-band-filtration algorithm applies denoising to the multiphase CT images themselves. This method does not require knowledge of the acquisition process or integration into the reconstruction system of the scanner, and it can be implemented as a supplement to commercially available IR algorithms. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of the present study is to compare radiologists' performance for low-contrast and high-contrast diagnostic tasks (i.e., tasks for which differences in CT attenuation between the imaging target and its anatomic background are subtle or large, respectively) evaluated on multiphase abdominal CT between routine-dose images and radiation dose-reduced images processed by a frequency-split multiband-filtration denoising algorithm. METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included 47 patients who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT for known or suspected liver metastases (a low-contrast task) and 45 patients who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT for pancreatic cancer staging (a high-contrast task). Radiation dose-reduced images corresponding to dose reduction of 50% or more were created using a validated noise insertion technique and then underwent denoising using the frequency-split multi-band-filtration algorithm. Images were independently evaluated in multiple sessions by different groups of abdominal radiologists for each task (three readers in the low-contrast arm and four readers in the high-contrast arm). The noninferiority of denoised radiation dose-reduced images to routine-dose images was assessed using the jackknife alternative free-response ROC (JAFROC) figure-of-merit (FOM; limit of noninferiority, -0.10) for liver metastases detection and using the Cohen kappa statistic and reader confidence scores (100-point scale) for pancreatic cancer vascular invasion. RESULTS. For liver metastases detection, the JAFROC FOM for denoised radiation dose-reduced images was 0.644 (95% CI, 0.510-0.778), and that for routine-dose images was 0.668 (95% CI, 0.543-0.792; estimated difference, -0.024 [95% CI, -0.084 to 0.037]). Intraobserver agreement for pancreatic cancer vascular invasion was substantial to near perfect when the two image sets were compared (κ = 0.53-1.00); the 95% CIs of all differences in confidence scores between image sets contained zero. CONCLUSION. Multiphase contrast-enhanced abdominal CT images with a radiation dose reduction of 50% or greater that undergo denoising by a frequency-split multiband-filtration algorithm yield performance similar to that of routine-dose images for detection of liver metastases and vascular staging of pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL IMPACT. The image-based denoising algorithm facilitates radiation dose reduction of multiphase examinations for both low- and high-contrast diagnostic tasks without requiring manufacturer-specific hardware or software.

Utilisation of virtual non-contrast images and virtual mono-energetic images acquired from dual-layer spectral CT for renal cell carcinoma: image quality and radiation dose

Background

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common renal malignant tumour. We evaluated the potential value and dose reduction of virtual non-contrast (VNC) images and virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) from dual-layer spectral CT (DL-CT) in the diagnosis of RCC.

Results

Sixty-two patients with pathologically confirmed RCC who underwent contrast-enhanced DL-CT were retrospectively analysed. For the comparison between true non-contrast (TNC) and VNC images of the excretory phase, the attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and subjective image quality of tumours and different abdominal organs and tissues were evaluated. To compare corticomedullary phase images and low keV VMIs (40 to 100 keV) from the nephrographic phase, the attenuation, image noise, SNR and subjective lesion visibility of the tumours and renal arteries were evaluated. For the tumours, significant differences were not observed in attenuation, noise or SNR between TNC and VNC images (p > 0.05). For the abdominal organs and tissues, except for fat, the difference in attenuation was 100% within 15 HU and 96.78% within 10 HU. The subjective image quality of TNC and VNC images was equivalent (p > 0.05). The attenuation of lesions in 40 keV VMIs and renal arteries in 60 keV VMIs were similar to those in the corticomedullary images (p > 0.05). The subjective lesion visibility in low keV VMIs is slightly lower than that in the corticomedullary images (p < 0.05). Using VNC and VMIs instead of TNC and corticomedullary phase images could decrease the radiation dose by 50.5%.

Conclusion

VNC images and VMIs acquired from DL-CT can maintain good image quality and decrease the radiation dose for diagnosis of RCC.

CT Noise-Reduction Methods for Lower-Dose Scanning: Strengths and Weaknesses of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms and New Techniques

Iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms are the most widely used CT noise-reduction method to improve image quality and have greatly facilitated radiation dose reduction within the radiology community. Various IR methods have different strengths and limitations. Because IR algorithms are typically nonlinear, they can modify spatial resolution and image noise texture in different regions of the CT image; hence traditional image-quality metrics are not appropriate to assess the ability of IR to preserve diagnostic accuracy, especially for low-contrast diagnostic tasks. In this review, the authors highlight emerging IR algorithms and CT noise-reduction techniques and summarize how these techniques can be evaluated to help determine the appropriate radiation dose levels for different diagnostic tasks in CT. In addition to advanced IR techniques, we describe novel CT noise-reduction methods based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNN-based noise-reduction techniques may offer the ability to reduce image noise while maintaining high levels of image detail but may have unique drawbacks. Other novel CT noise-reduction methods are being developed to leverage spatial and/or spectral redundancy in multiphase or multienergy CT. Radiologists and medical physicists should be familiar with these different alternatives to adapt available CT technology for different diagnostic tasks. The scope of this article is (a) to review the clinical applications of IR algorithms as well as their strengths, weaknesses, and methods of assessment and (b) to explore new CT image reconstruction and noise-reduction techniques that promise to facilitate radiation dose reduction. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Deep learning assisted differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from focal liver lesions: choice of four-phase and three-phase CT imaging protocol

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether a three-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced CT protocol, when combined with a deep learning model, has similar accuracy in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other focal liver lesions (FLLs) compared with a four-phase protocol.

METHODS

Three hundred and forty-two patients (mean age 49.1 ± 10.5 years, range 19-86 years, 65.8% male) scanned with a four-phase CT protocol (precontrast, arterial, portal-venous and delayed phases) were retrospectively enrolled. A total of 449 FLLs were categorized into HCC and non-HCC groups based on the best available reference standard. Three convolutional dense networks (CDNs) with the input of four-phase CT images (model A), three-phase images without portal-venous phase (model B) and three-phase images without precontrast phase (model C) were trained on 80% of lesions and evaluated in the other 20% by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and confusion matrix analysis. The DeLong test was performed to compare the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of A with B, B with C, and A with C.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy in differentiating HCC from other FLLs on test sets was 83.3% for model A, 81.1% for model B and 85.6% for model C, and the AUCs were 0.925, 0.862 and 0.920, respectively. The AUCs of models A and C did not differ significantly (p = 0.765), but the AUCs of models A and B (p = 0.038) and of models B and C (p = 0.028) did.

CONCLUSIONS

When combined with a CDN, a three-phase CT protocol without precontrast showed similar diagnostic accuracy as a four-phase protocol in differentiating HCC from other FLLs, suggesting that the multiphase CT protocol for HCC diagnosis might be optimized by removing the precontrast phase to reduce radiation dose.