Can whole-tumor radiomics-based CT analysis better differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell caricinoma: compared with conventional CT analysis?

Predictors of Benignity for Small Endophytic Echogenic Renal Masses

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate for distinguishing demographic and sonographic features of small (<3 cm) endophytic angiomyolipomas (AMLs) that differentiate them from endophytic renal cell carcinomas (RCCs).

METHODS

This is a Health Insurance Portablitiy and Accountablity Act (HIPAA)-compliant retrospective review of the demographics and ultrasound features of endophytic renal AMLs compared to a group of endophytic RCCs. AMLs were confirmed by identifying macroscopic fat on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), while RCCs were pathologically proven. Statistical analysis was used to compare findings in the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were a total of 66 patients with 66 AMLs, and 28 patients with 28 RCCs. Of the AMLs, 57 of 66 were in females, while 10 of the 28 RCC cases were in females (P < .0001). The mean AML long and short diameters were 11.0 × 9.3 mm and were statistically significantly smaller (P < .0001) than the diameters of the RCCs (23.4 × 22.1 mm). Likewise, the ratio of the long axis to the short axis measurement was statistically significantly different between the 2 groups (P < .0001). Of the studied sonographic features, statistically different features between AMLs and RCCs included an oval versus a round shape (P < .001), respectively, and the presence versus absence of an echogenic margin, respectively. Location of the mass, mass homogeneity, mass lobulation, and presence of cystic components were not distinguishing features using P < .01 levels.

CONCLUSION

For an endophytic echogenic mass in a female patient, a small size with an oval shape and an echogenic margin is statistically more likely to be an AML than an RCC, which may be helpful with management decisions.

Development of modified multi-parametric CT algorithms for diagnosing clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in small solid renal masses

OBJECTIVE

To refine the existing CT algorithm to enhance inter-reader agreement and improve the diagnostic performance for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in solid renal masses less than 4 cm.

METHODS

A retrospective collection of 331 patients with pathologically confirmed renal masses were enrolled in this study. Two radiologists independently assessed the CT images: in addition to heterogeneity score (HS) and mass-to-cortex corticomedullary attenuation ratio (MCAR), measured parameters included ratio of major diameter to minor diameter at the maximum axial section (Major axis / Minor axis), tumor-renal interface, standardized heterogeneity ratio (SHR), and standardized nephrographic reduction rate (SNRR). Spearman's correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between SHR and HS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent risk factors and then CT-score was adjusted by those indicators. The diagnostic efficacy of the modified CT-scores was evaluated using ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

The SHR and heterogeneity grade (HG) of mass were correlated positively with the HS (R = 0.749, 0.730, all P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis determined that the Major axis / Minor axis (> 1.16), the tumor-renal interface (> 22.3 mm), and the SNRR (> 0.16) as additional independent risk factors to combine with HS and MCAR. Compared to the original CT-score, the two CT algorithms combined tumor-renal interface and SNRR showed significantly improved diagnostic efficacy for ccRCC (AUC: 0.770 vs. 0.861 and 0.862, all P < 0.001). The inter-observer agreement for HG was higher than that for HS (weighted Kappa coefficient: 0.797 vs. 0.722). The consistency of modified CT-score was also superior to original CT-score (weighted Kappa coefficient: 0.935 vs. 0.878).

CONCLUSION

The modified CT algorithms not only enhanced inter-reader consistency but also improved the diagnostic capability for ccRCC in small renal masses.

A noninvasive comprehensive model based on medium sample size had good diagnostic performance in distinguishing renal fat-poor angiomyolipoma from homogeneous clear cell renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic value of a comprehensive model based on unenhanced computed tomography (CT) images for distinguishing fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fp-AML) from homogeneous clear cell renal cell carcinoma (hm-ccRCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients with fp-AML and 63 with hm-ccRCC. Demographic data and conventional CT features of the lesions were recorded (including sex, age, symptoms, lesion location, shape, boundary, unenhanced CT attenuation and so on). Whole tumor regions of interest were drawn on all slices to obtain histogram parameters (including minimum, maximum, mean, percentile, standard deviation, variance, coefficient of variation, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy) by two radiologists. Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, or independent samples t-test were used to compare demographic data, CT features, and histogram parameters. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to screen for independent predictors distinguishing fp-AML from hm-ccRCC. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of the models.

RESULTS

Age, sex, tumor boundary, unenhanced CT attenuation, maximum tumor diameter, and tumor volume significantly differed between patients with fp-AML and those with hm-ccRCC (P < 0.05). The minimum, mean, first percentile (Perc.01), Perc.05, Perc.10, Perc.25, Perc.50, Perc.75, Perc.90, Perc.95, and Perc.99 of the Fp-AML group were higher than those of the hm-ccRCC group (P < 0.05). Coefficient of variance, skewness, and kurtosis were lower than those in the hm-ccRCC group (all P < 0.05). Age, maximum tumor diameter, unenhanced CT attenuation, and Perc.25 were independent predictors for distinguishing fp-AML from hm-ccRCC (all P < 0.05). The comprehensive model, incorporating age, maximum tumor diameter, unenhanced CT attenuation, and Perc.25, showed the best diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.979).

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive model based on unenhanced CT imaging can accurately distinguish fp-AML from hm-ccRCC and may assist clinicians in tailoring precise therapy, while also helping to improve the diagnosis and management of renal tumors, leading to the selection of effective treatment options.

Artificial intelligence in fracture detection on radiographs: a literature review

Fractures are one of the most common reasons of admission to emergency department affecting individuals of all ages and regions worldwide that can be misdiagnosed during radiologic examination. Accurate and timely diagnosis of fracture is crucial for patients, and artificial intelligence that uses algorithms to imitate human intelligence to aid or enhance human performs is a promising solution to address this issue. In the last few years, numerous commercially available algorithms have been developed to enhance radiology practice and a large number of studies apply artificial intelligence to fracture detection. Recent contributions in literature have described numerous advantages showing how artificial intelligence performs better than doctors who have less experience in interpreting musculoskeletal X-rays, and assisting radiologists increases diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity, improves efficiency, and reduces interpretation time. Furthermore, algorithms perform better when they are trained with big data on a wide range of fracture patterns and variants and can provide standardized fracture identification across different radiologist, thanks to the structured report. In this review article, we discuss the use of artificial intelligence in fracture identification and its benefits and disadvantages. We also discuss its current potential impact on the field of radiology and radiomics.

Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in detection and prognostication of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

The prevalence of Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing among adults. Histopathologic samples obtained after surgical resection or from biopsies of a renal mass require subtype classification for diagnosis, prognosis, and to determine surveillance. Deep learning in artificial intelligence (AI) and pathomics are rapidly advancing, leading to numerous applications such as histopathological diagnosis. In our meta-analysis, we assessed the pooled diagnostic performances of deep neural network (DNN) frameworks in detecting RCC subtypes and to predicting survival.

Methods

A systematic search was done in PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus from inception to November 2023. The random effects model was used to calculate the pooled percentages, mean, and 95% confidence interval. Accuracy was defined as the number of cases identified by AI out of the total number of cases, i.e. (True Positive + True Negative)/(True Positive + True Negative + False Positive + False Negative). The heterogeneity between study-specific estimates was assessed by the I 2 statistic. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to conduct and report the analysis.

Results

The search retrieved 347 studies; 13 retrospective studies evaluating 5340 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled performance of the DNN was as follows: accuracy 92.3% (95% CI: 85.8-95.9; I 2 = 98.3%), sensitivity 97.5% (95% CI: 83.2-99.7; I 2 = 92%), specificity 89.2% (95% CI: 29.9-99.4; I 2 = 99.6%) and area under the curve 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.97.3; I 2 = 99.6%). Specifically, their accuracy in RCC subtype detection was 93.5% (95% CI: 88.7-96.3; I 2 = 92%), and the accuracy in survival analysis prediction was 81% (95% CI: 67.8-89.6; I 2 = 94.4%).

Discussion

The DNN showed excellent pooled diagnostic accuracy rates to classify RCC into subtypes and grade them for prognostic purposes. Further studies are required to establish generalizability and validate these findings on a larger scale.

Are There Ultrasound Features to Distinguish Small (<3 cm) Peripheral Renal Angiomyolipomas From Renal Cell Carcinomas?

BACKGROUND

Small echogenic renal masses are usually angiomyolipomas (AMLs), but some renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) can be echogenic and confused with an AML.

OBJECTIVES

This is a study to evaluate any distinguishing demographic and sonographic features of small (<3 cm) peripheral AMLs versus peripheral RCCs.

METHODS

This is a HIPAA-compliant retrospective review of the demographics and ultrasound features of peripheral renal AMLs compared with a group of peripheral RCCs. All AMLs had confirmation of macroscopic fat as noted on thin-cut CT or fat-saturation MRI sequence images. All RCCs were pathologically proven. Statistical analysis was used to compare findings in the two groups.

RESULTS

There were a total of 52 patients with 56 AMLs, compared with 42 patients with 42 RCCs. There were 42 females in the AML group versus 10 females in the RCC group (P < .0001). The AML diameters (15.7 mm × 12.0 mm) were statistically significantly smaller (Plargest  = .0085, Psmallest  < .001) than the diameters of the RCCs (19.9 mm × 18.5 mm). Ultrasound features found to be statistically different between the two groups were the ratio of the largest dimension to the smallest dimension (P < .001), a lobulated versus smooth margin of the AML (26 vs 30) compared with the RCC group (3 vs 39) (P = .0012), and an "unusual" versus a round shape (P < .001) of the AML group (45 vs 11) compared with the RCC group (9 vs 33). In the multivariable model, the patient sex, margin, and mass shape were predictive of AML, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92.

CONCLUSION

For a small (<3 cm) peripheral echogenic mass in a female patient, a lobulated lesion with an unusual shape is highly predictive of being an AML.

A CT-Based Clinical, Radiological and Radiomic Machine Learning Model for Predicting Malignancy of Solid Renal Tumors (UroCCR-75)

BACKGROUND

Differentiating benign from malignant renal tumors is important for patient management, and it may be improved by quantitative CT features analysis including radiomic.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare performances of machine learning models using bio-clinical, conventional radiologic and 3D-radiomic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant solid renal tumors using pre-operative multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A unicentric retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from a national kidney cancer database was conducted between January 2016 and December 2020. Histologic findings were obtained by robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. Lesion images were semi-automatically segmented, allowing for a 3D-radiomic features extraction in the nephrographic phase. Conventional radiologic parameters such as shape, content and enhancement were combined in the analysis. Biological and clinical features were obtained from the national database. Eight machine learning (ML) models were trained and validated using a ten-fold cross-validation. Predictive performances were evaluated comparing sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients with 132 renal lesions, including 111 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) (111/132, 84%) and 21 benign tumors (21/132, 16%), were evaluated (58 +/- 14 years, men 74%). Unilaterality (100/111, 90% vs. 13/21, 62%; p = 0.02), necrosis (81/111, 73% vs. 8/21, 38%; p = 0.02), lower values of tumor/cortex ratio at portal time (0.61 vs. 0.74, p = 0.01) and higher variation of tumor/cortex ratio between arterial and portal times (0.22 vs. 0.05, p = 0.008) were associated with malignancy. A total of 35 radiomics features were selected, and "intensity mean value" was associated with RCCs in multivariate analysis (OR = 0.99). After ten-fold cross-validation, a C5.0Tree model was retained for its predictive performances, yielding a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 42%, accuracy of 87% and AUC of 0.74.

CONCLUSION

Our machine learning-based model combining clinical, radiologic and radiomics features from multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT scans may help differentiate benign from malignant solid renal tumors.

Role of AI and Radiomic Markers in Early Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and Clinical Outcome Prediction: A Brief Review

Globally, renal cancer (RC) is the 10th most common cancer among men and women. The new era of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics have allowed the development of AI-based computer-aided diagnostic/prediction (AI-based CAD/CAP) systems, which have shown promise for the diagnosis of RC (i.e., subtyping, grading, and staging) and prediction of clinical outcomes at an early stage. This will absolutely help reduce diagnosis time, enhance diagnostic abilities, reduce invasiveness, and provide guidance for appropriate management procedures to avoid the burden of unresponsive treatment plans. This survey mainly has three primary aims. The first aim is to highlight the most recent technical diagnostic studies developed in the last decade, with their findings and limitations, that have taken the advantages of AI and radiomic markers derived from either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images to develop AI-based CAD systems for accurate diagnosis of renal tumors at an early stage. The second aim is to highlight the few studies that have utilized AI and radiomic markers, with their findings and limitations, to predict patients' clinical outcome/treatment response, including possible recurrence after treatment, overall survival, and progression-free survival in patients with renal tumors. The promising findings of the aforementioned studies motivated us to highlight the optimal AI-based radiomic makers that are correlated with the diagnosis of renal tumors and prediction/assessment of patients' clinical outcomes. Finally, we conclude with a discussion and possible future avenues for improving diagnostic and treatment prediction performance.

Distinguishing lipid-poor angiomyolipoma from renal carcinoma using tumor shape

OBJECTIVES

To validate the "overflowing beer sign" (OBS) for distinguishing between lipid-poor angiomyolipoma (AML) and renal cell carcinoma, and to determine whether it improves the detection of lipid-poor AML when added to the angular interface sign, a previously-validated morphologic feature associated with AML.

METHODS

Retrospective nested case-control study of all 134 AMLs in an institutional renal mass database matched 1:2 with 268 malignant renal masses from the same database. Cross-sectional imaging from each mass was reviewed and the presence of each sign was identified. A random selection of 60 masses (30 AML and 30 benign) was used to measure interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

Both signs were strongly associated with AML in the total population (OBS: OR 17.4 95% CI 8.0-42.5, p < 0.001; angular interface: OR 12.6, 95% CI 5.9-29.7, p < 0.001) and the population of patients excluding those with visible macroscopic fat (OBS: OR 11.2, 95% CI 4.8-28.7, p < 0.001; angular interface: 8.5, 95% CI 3.7-21.1, p < 0.001). In the lipid-poor population, the specificity of both signs was excellent (OBS: 95.6%, 95% CI 91.9%-98%; angular interface: 95.1%, 95% CI 91.3%-97.6%). Sensitivity was low for both signs (OBS: 31.4%, 95% CI 24.0-45.4%; angular interface: 30.5%, 95% CI 20.8%-41.6%). Both signs showed high levels of inter-rater agreement (OBS 90.0% 95% CI 80.5 - 95.9; angular interface 88.6, 95% CI 78.7-94.9) Testing for AML using the presence of either sign in this population improved sensitivity (39.0%, 95% CI 28.4%-50.4%, p = 0.023) without significantly reducing specificity (94.2%, 95% CI 90%-97%, p = 0.2) relative to the angular interface sign alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition of the OBS increases the sensitivity of detection of lipid-poor AML without significantly reducing specificity.

Radiogenomics in Renal Cancer Management-Current Evidence and Future Prospects

Renal cancer management is challenging from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up. In cases of small renal masses and cystic lesions the differential diagnosis of benign or malignant tissues has potential pitfalls when imaging or even renal biopsy is applied. The recent artificial intelligence, imaging techniques, and genomics advancements have the ability to help clinicians set the stratification risk, treatment selection, follow-up strategy, and prognosis of the disease. The combination of radiomics features and genomics data has achieved good results but is currently limited by the retrospective design and the small number of patients included in clinical trials. The road ahead for radiogenomics is open to new, well-designed prospective studies, with large cohorts of patients required to validate previously obtained results and enter clinical practice.

Artificial intelligence and radiomics in evaluation of kidney lesions: a comprehensive literature review

Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) may increase the differentiation of benign from malignant kidney lesions, differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC), differentiation of oncocytoma from RCC, differentiation of different subtypes of RCC, to predict Fuhrman grade, to predict gene mutation through molecular biomarkers and to predict treatment response in metastatic RCC undergoing immunotherapy. Neural networks analyze imaging data. Statistical, geometrical, textural features derived are giving quantitative data of contour, internal heterogeneity and gray zone features of lesions. A comprehensive literature review was performed, until July 2022. Studies investigating the diagnostic value of radiomics in differentiation of renal lesions, grade prediction, gene alterations, molecular biomarkers and ongoing clinical trials have been analyzed. The application of AI and radiomics could lead to improved sensitivity, specificity, accuracy in detecting and differentiating between renal lesions. Standardization of scanner protocols will improve preoperative differentiation between benign, low-risk cancers and clinically significant renal cancers and holds the premises to enhance the diagnostic ability of imaging tools to characterize renal lesions.

Artificial intelligence for early detection of renal cancer in computed tomography: A review

Renal cancer is responsible for over 100,000 yearly deaths and is principally discovered in computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen. CT screening would likely increase the rate of early renal cancer detection, and improve general survival rates, but it is expected to have a prohibitively high financial cost. Given recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), it may be possible to reduce the cost of CT analysis and enable CT screening by automating the radiological tasks that constitute the early renal cancer detection pipeline. This review seeks to facilitate further interdisciplinary research in early renal cancer detection by summarising our current knowledge across AI, radiology, and oncology and suggesting useful directions for future novel work. Initially, this review discusses existing approaches in automated renal cancer diagnosis, and methods across broader AI research, to summarise the existing state of AI cancer analysis. Then, this review matches these methods to the unique constraints of early renal cancer detection and proposes promising directions for future research that may enable AI-based early renal cancer detection via CT screening. The primary targets of this review are clinicians with an interest in AI and data scientists with an interest in the early detection of cancer.

MRI-Based Radiomics and Urine Creatinine for the Differentiation of Renal Angiomyolipoma With Minimal Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study

Objectives

Standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are different to distinguish minimal fat angiomyolipoma (mf-AML) with minimal fat from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Here we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI-based radiomics in the differentiation of fat-poor AMLs from other renal neoplasms.

Methods

A total of 69 patients with solid renal tumors without macroscopic fat and with a pathologic diagnosis of RCC (n=50) or mf-AML (n=19) who underwent conventional MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) were included. Clinical data including age, sex, tumor location, urine creatinine, and urea nitrogen were collected from medical records. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were measured from renal tumors. We used the ITK-SNAP software to manually delineate the regions of interest on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and IVIM-DWI from the largest cross-sectional area of the tumor. We extracted 396 radiomics features by the Analysis Kit software for each MR sequence. The hand-crafted features were selected by using the Pearson correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Diagnostic models were built by logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed using five-fold cross-validation and the mean area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared between the models to obtain the optimal model for the differentiation of mf-AML and RCC. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the models.

Results

Clinical model based on urine creatinine achieved an AUC of 0.802 (95%CI: 0.761-0.843). IVIM-based model based on f value achieved an AUC of 0.692 (95%CI: 0.627-0.757). T2WI-radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.883 (95%CI: 0.852-0.914). IVIM-radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.874 (95%CI: 0.841-0.907). Combined radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.919 (95%CI: 0.894-0.944). Clinical-radiomics model yielded the best performance, with an AUC of 0.931 (95%CI: 0.907-0.955). The calibration curve and DCA confirmed that the clinical-radiomics model had a good consistency and clinical usefulness.

Conclusion

The clinical-radiomics model may be served as a noninvasive diagnostic tool to differentiate mf-AML with RCC, which might facilitate the clinical decision-making process.

Artificial intelligence for renal cancer: From imaging to histology and beyond

Artificial intelligence (AI) has made considerable progress within the last decade and is the subject of contemporary literature. This trend is driven by improved computational abilities and increasing amounts of complex data that allow for new approaches in analysis and interpretation. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has a rising incidence since most tumors are now detected at an earlier stage due to improved imaging. This creates considerable challenges as approximately 10%–17% of kidney tumors are designated as benign in histopathological evaluation; however, certain co-morbid populations (the obese and elderly) have an increased peri-interventional risk. AI offers an alternative solution by helping to optimize precision and guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. The narrative review introduced basic principles and provide a comprehensive overview of current AI techniques for RCC. Currently, AI applications can be found in any aspect of RCC management including diagnostics, perioperative care, pathology, and follow-up. Most commonly applied models include neural networks, random forest, support vector machines, and regression. However, for implementation in daily practice, health care providers need to develop a basic understanding and establish interdisciplinary collaborations in order to standardize datasets, define meaningful endpoints, and unify interpretation.

Utility of radiomics features of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: model development and external validation

PURPOSE

To investigate the utility of radiomics features of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) to differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fpAML) from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multi-institutional study included two cohorts with pathologically confirmed renal tumors: 65 patients with ccRCC and 18 with fpAML in the model development cohort, and 17 with ccRCC and 13 with fpAML in the external validation cohort. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including DW-MRI. Radiomics analysis was used to extract 39 imaging features from the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. The radiomics features were analyzed with unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis. A random forest (RF) model was used to identify radiomics features important for differentiating fpAML from ccRCC in the development cohort. The diagnostic performance of the RF model was evaluated in the development and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

The cases in the developmental cohort were classified into three groups with different frequencies of fpAML by cluster analysis of radiomics features. RF analysis of the development cohort showed that the mean ADC value was important for differentiating fpAML from ccRCC, as well as higher-texture features including gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM)_long-run low gray-level enhancement (LRLGE), and GLRLM_low gray-level run emphasis (LGRE). The area under the curve values of the development [0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.00] and validation cohorts (0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.00) were similar (P = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

The radiomics features of ADC maps are useful for differentiating fpAML from ccRCC.

Novel Imaging Methods for Renal Mass Characterization: A Collaborative Review

CONTEXT

The incidental detection of localized renal masses has been rising steadily, but a significant proportion of these tumors are benign or indolent and, in most cases, do not require treatment. At the present time, a majority of patients with an incidentally detected renal tumor undergo treatment for the presumption of cancer, leading to a significant number of unnecessary surgical interventions that can result in complications including loss of renal function. Thus, there exists a clinical need for improved tools to aid in the pretreatment characterization of renal tumors to inform patient management.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence on noninvasive, imaging-based tools for solid renal mass characterization.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The MEDLINE database was systematically searched for relevant studies on novel imaging techniques and interpretative tools for the characterization of solid renal masses, published in the past 10 yr.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Over the past decade, several novel imaging tools have offered promise for the improved characterization of indeterminate renal masses. Technologies of particular note include multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the kidney, molecular imaging with targeted radiopharmaceutical agents, and use of radiomics as well as artificial intelligence to enhance the interpretation of imaging studies. Among these, 99mTc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (CT) for the identification of benign renal oncocytomas and hybrid oncocytic chromophobe tumors, and positron emission tomography/CT imaging with radiolabeled girentuximab for the identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, are likely to be closest to implementation in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of novel imaging tools stand poised to aid in the noninvasive characterization of indeterminate renal masses. In the future, these tools may aid in patient management by providing a comprehensive virtual biopsy, complete with information on tumor histology, underlying molecular abnormalities, and ultimately disease prognosis.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Not all renal tumors require treatment, as a significant proportion are either benign or have limited metastatic potential. Several innovative imaging tools have shown promise for their ability to improve the characterization of renal tumors and provide guidance in terms of patient management.

A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with a central scar-matched study

OBJECTIVE

Pre-operative differentiation between renal oncocytoma (RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is critical due to their different clinical behavior and different clinical treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a CT-based radiomics nomogram for the pre-operative differentiation of RO from chRCC.

METHODS

A total of 141 patients (84 in training data set and 57 in external validation data set) with ROs (n = 47) or chRCCs (n = 94) were included. Radiomics features were extracted from tri-phasic enhanced-CT images. A clinical model was developed based on significant patient characteristics and CT imaging features. A radiomics signature model was developed and a radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated. A radiomics nomogram model incorporating the Rad-score and independent clinical factors was developed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance was evaluated and validated in three models using ROC curves.

RESULTS

Twelve features from CT images were selected to develop the radiomics signature. The radiomics nomogram combining a clinical factor (segmental enhancement inversion) and radiomics signature showed an AUC value of 0.988 in the validation set. Decision curve analysis revealed that the diagnostic performance of the radiomics nomogram was better than the clinical model and the radiomics signature.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomics nomogram combining clinical factors and radiomics signature performed well for distinguishing RO from chRCC.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Differential diagnosis between renal oncocytoma (RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is rather difficult by conventional imaging modalities when a central scar was present.A radiomics nomogram integrated with the radiomics signature, demographics, and CT findings facilitates differentiation of RO from chRCC with improved diagnostic efficacy.The CT-based radiomics nomogram might spare unnecessary surgery for RO.

Differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from small clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using specific region of interest on contrast-enhanced CT: a new combination of quantitative tools

Background

To investigate the value of using specific region of interest (ROI) on contrast-enhanced CT for differentiating renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat (AML.wovf) from small clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Methods

Four-phase (pre-contrast phase [PCP], corticomedullary phase [CMP], nephrographic phase [NP], and excretory phase [EP]) contrast-enhanced CT images of AML.wovf (n = 31) and ccRCC (n = 74) confirmed by histopathology were retrospectively analyzed. The CT attenuation value of tumor (AVT), net enhancement value (NEV), relative enhancement ratio (RER), heterogeneous degree of tumor (HDT) and standardized heterogeneous ratio (SHR) were obtained by using different ROIs [small: ROI (1), smaller: ROI (2), large: ROI (3)], and the differences of these quantitative data between AML.wovf and ccRCC were statistically analyzed. Multivariate regression was used to screen the main factors for differentiation in each scanning phase, and the prediction models were established and evaluated.

Results

Among the quantitative parameters determined by different ROIs, the degree of enhancement measured by ROI (2) and the enhanced heterogeneity measured by ROI (3) performed better than ROI (1) in distinguishing AML.wovf from ccRCC. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of RER_CMP (2), RER_NP (2) measured by ROI (2) and HDT_CMP and SHR_CMP measured by ROI (3) were higher (AUC = 0.876, 0.849, 0.837 and 0.800). Prediction models that incorporated demographic data, morphological features and quantitative data derived from the enhanced phase were superior to quantitative data derived from the pre-contrast phase in differentiating between AML.wovf and ccRCC. Among them, the model in CMP was the best prediction model with the highest AUC (AUC = 0.986).

Conclusion

The combination of quantitative data obtained by specific ROI in CMP can be used as a simple quantitative tool to distinguish AML.wovf from ccRCC, which has a high diagnostic value after combining demographic data and morphological features.

CT-based radiomics for differentiating renal tumours: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Differentiating renal tumours into grades and tumour subtype from medical imaging is important for patient management; however, there is an element of subjectivity when performed qualitatively. Quantitative analysis such as radiomics may provide a more objective approach. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the literature on computed tomography (CT) radiomics for grading and differentiating renal tumour subtypes. An educational perspective will also be provided.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was followed. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles. The quality of each study was assessed using the Radiomic Quality Score (RQS).

RESULTS

13 studies were found. The main outcomes were prediction of pathological grade and differentiating between renal tumour types, measured as area under the curve (AUC) for either the receiver operator curve or precision recall curve. Features extracted to predict pathological grade or tumour subtype included shape, intensity, texture and wavelet (a type of higher order feature). Four studies differentiated between low-grade and high-grade clear cell renal cell cancer (RCC) with good performance (AUC = 0.82-0.978). One other study differentiated low- and high-grade chromophobe with AUC = 0.84. Finally, eight studies used radiomics to differentiate between tumour types such as clear cell RCC, fat-poor angiomyolipoma, papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC and renal oncocytoma with high levels of performance (AUC 0.82-0.96).

CONCLUSION

Renal tumours can be pathologically classified using CT-based radiomics with good performance. The main radiomic feature used for tumour differentiation was texture. Fuhrman was the most common pathologic grading system used in the reviewed studies. Renal tumour grading studies should be extended beyond clear cell RCC and chromophobe RCC. Further research with larger prospective studies, performed in the clinical setting, across multiple institutions would help with clinical translation to the radiologist's workstation.

A Non-Invasive Scoring System to Differential Diagnosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) From Renal Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat (RAML-wvf) Based on CT Features

Background

Renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat (RAML-wvf) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have many overlapping features on imaging, which poses a challenge to radiologists. This study aimed to create a scoring system to distinguish ccRCC from RAML-wvf using computed tomography imaging.

Methods

A total of 202 patients from 2011 to 2019 that were confirmed by pathology with ccRCC (n=123) or RAML (n=79) were retrospectively analyzed by dividing them randomly into a training cohort (n=142) and a validation cohort (n=60). A model was established using logistic regression and weighted to be a scoring system. ROC, AUC, cut-off point, and calibration analyses were performed. The scoring system was divided into three ranges for convenience in clinical evaluations, and the diagnostic probability of ccRCC was calculated.

Results

Four independent risk factors are included in the system: 1) presence of a pseudocapsule, 2) a heterogeneous tumor parenchyma in pre-enhancement scanning, 3) a non-high CT attenuation in pre-enhancement scanning, and 4) a heterogeneous enhancement in CMP. The prediction accuracy had an ROC of 0.978 (95% CI, 0.956–0.999; P=0.011), similar to the primary model (ROC, 0.977; 95% CI, 0.954–1.000; P=0.012). A sensitivity of 91.4% and a specificity of 93.9% were achieved using 4.5 points as the cutoff value. Validation showed a good result (ROC, 0.922; 95% CI, 0.854–0.991, P=0.035). The number of patients with ccRCC in the three ranges (0 to <2 points; 2–4 points; >4 to ≤11 points) significantly increased with increasing scores.

Conclusion

This scoring system is convenient for distinguishing between ccRCC and RAML-wvf using four computed tomography features.

Exploration of an Integrative Prognostic Model of Radiogenomics Features With Underlying Gene Expression Patterns in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common malignancies in urinary system, and radiomics has been adopted in tumor staging and prognostic evaluation in renal carcinomas. This study aimed to integrate image features of contrast-enhanced CT and underlying genomics features to predict the overall survival (OS) of ccRCC patients.

Method

We extracted 107 radiomics features out of 205 patients with available CT images obtained from TCIA database and corresponding clinical and genetic information from TCGA database. LASSO-COX and SVM-RFE were employed independently as machine-learning algorithms to select prognosis-related imaging features (PRIF). Afterwards, we identified prognosis-related gene signature through WGCNA. The random forest (RF) algorithm was then applied to integrate PRIF and the genes into a combined imaging-genomics prognostic factors (IGPF) model. Furthermore, we constructed a nomogram incorporating IGPF and clinical predictors as the integrative prognostic model for ccRCC patients.

Results

A total of four PRIF and four genes were identified as IGPF and were represented by corresponding risk score in RF model. The integrative IGPF model presented a better prediction performance than the PRIF model alone (average AUCs for 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 0.814 vs. 0.837, 0.74 vs. 0.806, and 0.689 vs. 0.751 in test set). Clinical characteristics including gender, TNM stage and IGPF were independent risk factors. The nomogram integrating clinical predictors and IGPF provided the best net benefit among the three models.

Conclusion

In this study we established an integrative prognosis-related nomogram model incorporating imaging-genomic features and clinical indicators. The results indicated that IGPF may contribute to a comprehensive prognosis assessment for ccRCC patients.

A CT-Based Tumoral and Mini-Peritumoral Radiomics Approach: Differentiate Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the role of tumor and mini-peritumor in the context of CT-based radiomics analysis to differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fp-AML) from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Methods

A total of 58 fp-AMLs and 172 ccRCCs were enrolled. The volume of interest (VOI) was manually delineated in the standardized CT images and radiomics features were automatically calculated with software. After methods of feature selection, the CT-based logistic models including tumoral model (Ra-tumor), mini-peritumoral model (Ra-peritumor), perirenal model (Ra-Pr), perifat model (Ra-Pf), and tumoral+perirenal model (Ra-tumor+Pr) were constructed. The area under curves (AUCs) were calculated by DeLong test to evaluate the efficiency of logistic models.

Results

The AUCs of Ra-peritumor of nephrographic phase (NP) were slightly higher than those of corticomedullary phase (CMP). Furthermore, the Ra-Pr showed significant higher efficiency than the Ra-Pf, and relative more optimal radiomics features were selected in the Ra-Pr than Ra-Pf. The Ra-tumor+Pr combined tumoral and perirenal radiomics analysis was of most significant in distinction compared with Ra-tumor and Ra-peritumor.

Conclusion

The validity of NP to differentiate fp-AML from ccRCC was slightly higher than that of CMP. To the NP analysis, the Ra-Pr was superior to the Ra-Pf in distinction, and the lesions invaded to the perirenal tissue more severely than to the perifat tissue. It is important to the individual therapeutic surgeries according to the different lesion location. The pooled tumoral and perirenal radiomics analysis was the most promising approach in distinguishing fp-AML and ccRCC.

Early dark cortical band sign on CT for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from fat poor angiomyolipoma and detecting peritumoral pseudocapsule

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively evaluate whether the early dark cortical band (EDCB) on CT can be a predictor to differentiate clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from fat poor angiomyolipoma (Fp-AML) and to detect peritumoral pseudocapsules in ccRCC.

METHODS

The EDCBs, which are comprised of unenhanced thin lines at the tumor-renal cortex border in the corticomedullary phase, on the CT images of 342 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy were evaluated. Independent predictors among the clinical and CT findings for differentiating ccRCC from Fp-AML were identified using multivariate analyses. The diagnostic performance of the EDCB for diagnosing peritumoral pseudocapsule in ccRCC and differentiating ccRCC from Fp-AML was calculated.

RESULTS

The EDCB was observed in 157 of 254 (61.8%) ccRCCs, 4 of 31 (12.9%) chromophobe RCCs, 1 of 21 (4.8%) papillary RCCs, 3 of 11 (27.3%) clear cell papillary RCCs, 3 of 8 (37.5%) oncocytomas, and 0 of 17 (0%) Fp-AMLs. There was substantial interobserver agreement for the EDCB (k = 0.719). The EDCB was a significant predictor for differentiating ccRCC from Fp-AML (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value of the EDCB for differentiating ccRCC from Fp-AML were 61.8%, 100%, 100%, and 14.9%, respectively, and those for detecting pseudocapsule in 236 ccRCCs were 62.3%, 68.8%, 96.5%, and 11.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although diagnostic accuracy of the EDCB for detecting peritumoral pseudocapsule in RCC is inadequate, it can be a predictor for differentiating ccRCC from Fp-AML with high specificity and PPV.

KEY POINTS

• The early dark cortical band (EDCB) sign is observed in nearly two-thirds of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) that are treated by partial nephrectomy and have substantial interobserver agreement. • The EDCB is a significant predictor for differentiating ccRCCs from fat poor angiomyolipomas, with a high specificity and positive predictive value. • Diagnostic accuracy of the EDCB for detecting peritumoral pseudocapsule in ccRCC is inadequate, though better than those in the nephrographic and excretory-phase images.

Automated segmentation of kidney and renal mass and automated detection of renal mass in CT urography using 3D U-Net-based deep convolutional neural network

OBJECTIVES

To develop a 3D U-Net-based deep learning model for automated segmentation of kidney and renal mass, and detection of renal mass in corticomedullary phase of computed tomography urography (CTU).

METHODS

Data on 882 kidneys obtained from CTU data of 441 patients with renal mass were used to learn and evaluate the deep learning model. The CTU data of 35 patients with small renal tumors (diameter ≤ 1.5 cm) were used for additional testing. The ground truth data for the kidney, renal tumor, and cyst were manually annotated on corticomedullary phase images of CTU. The proposed segmentation model for kidney and renal mass was constructed based on a 3D U-Net. The segmentation accuracy was evaluated through the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The volume of the maximum 3D volume of interest of renal tumor and cyst in the predicted segmentation by the model was used as an identification indicator, while the detection performance of the model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operation characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The proposed model showed a high accuracy in segmentation of kidney and renal tumor, with average DSC of 0.973 and 0.844, respectively. It performed moderately in the renal cyst segmentation, with an average DSC of 0.536 in the test set. Also, this model showed good performance in detecting renal tumor and cyst.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed automated segmentation and detection model based on 3D U-Net shows promising results for the segmentation of kidney and renal tumor, and the detection of renal tumor and cyst.

KEY POINTS

• The segmentation model based on 3D U-Net showed high accuracy in segmentation of kidney and renal neoplasm, and good detection performance of renal neoplasm and cyst in corticomedullary phase of CTU. • The segmentation model based on 3D U-Net is a fully automated aided diagnostic tool that could be used to reduce the workload of radiologists and improve the accuracy of diagnosis. • The segmentation model based on 3D U-Net would be helpful to provide quantitative information for diagnosis, treatment, surgical planning, etc.

Differential diagnosis of hypervascular ultra-small renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat in early stage by using thin-section multidetector computed tomography

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference between imaging features of ultra-small renal cell carcinoma (usRCC) and angiomyolipoma with minimal fat (mfAML) whose enhancement were both hypervascular by using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Confirmed by pathology, 40 cases of hypervascular usRCC and 21 cases of hypervascular mfAML both with diameter of 2 cm or less were compared and analyzed retrospectively, including traditional imaging features and thin-section computed tomography (CT) dynamic enhanced parameters. Meanwhile, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each significant parameter and the information with diagnostic value was selected to construct the prediction model.

RESULTS

Comparison of traditional imaging features: the features, included age, shape, location, central location of tumor, wedge sign, renal cortex lift sign, black star sign, enhanced homogeneity in cortical phase (CP) and enhancement pattern had no significant difference between usRCC and mfAML (P > 0.05); sex, cystic degeneration or necrosis, pseudocapsule sign, and enhanced homogeneity in nephrographic phase (NP) had significant differences between usRCC and mfAML (P < 0.05). Comparison of CT dynamic enhanced parameters: the CT value, NEV and REV of usRCC were all higher than mfAML in both CP and NP (P < 0.01). Respectively, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.74, 0.75, 0.78, 0.83, 0.81 and 0.78. The sensitivity and specificity for differentiating ucRCC from mfAML were 85.0% and 76.2% respectively when NEV_NP was 73.6 HU as the critical value. Multivariate analysis showed that male, cystic degeneration or necrosis, and NEV_NP higher than 73.6 HU as an independent risk factor for usRCC (P < 0.01). The AUC value of the prediction model constructed by the combination was 0.94, the accuracy was 86.89%, the sensitivity was 82.50%, and the specificity was 95.24%.

CONCLUSION

Morphological characteristics in traditional diagnosis of small renal carcinoma (diameter of 4 cm or less) have certain significance in differentiating hypervascular usRCC and mfAML in early stage, but the diagnostic efficacy was limited. Sex, cystic degeneration or necrosis, and quantitative parameters measured after enhancement play an important role in differential diagnosis of hypervascular usRCC and mfAML, and the prediction model constructed by the combination has a good diagnostic performance.

Radiomics Applications in Renal Tumor Assessment: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Radiomics texture analysis offers objective image information that could otherwise not be obtained by radiologists′ subjective radiological interpretation. We investigated radiomics applications in renal tumor assessment and provide a comprehensive review. A detailed search of original articles was performed using the PubMed-MEDLINE database until 20 March 2020 to identify English literature relevant to radiomics applications in renal tumor assessment. In total, 42 articles were included in the analysis and divided into four main categories: renal mass differentiation, nuclear grade prediction, gene expression-based molecular signatures, and patient outcome prediction. The main area of research involves accurately differentiating benign and malignant renal masses, specifically between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes and from angiomyolipoma without visible fat and oncocytoma. Nuclear grade prediction may enhance proper patient selection for risk-stratified treatment. Radiomics-predicted gene mutations may serve as surrogate biomarkers for high-risk disease, while predicting patients’ responses to targeted therapies and their outcomes will help develop personalized treatment algorithms. Studies generally reported the superiority of radiomics over expert radiological interpretation. Radiomics provides an alternative to subjective image interpretation for improving renal tumor diagnostic accuracy. Further incorporation of clinical and imaging data into radiomics algorithms will augment tumor prediction accuracy and enhance individualized medicine.