Computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation combined with transarterial embolization assisted by a three-dimensional visualization ablation planning system for hepatocellular carcinoma in challenging locations: a preliminary study

Ablative and non-surgical therapies for early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

A wide range of ablative and non-surgical therapies are available for treating small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with very early or early-stage disease and preserved liver function.

Objective

To review and compare the effectiveness of all current ablative and non-surgical therapies for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 3 cm).

Design

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data sources

Nine databases (March 2021), two trial registries (April 2021) and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews.

Review methods

Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of ablative and non-surgical therapies, versus any comparator, for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Randomised controlled trials were quality assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and mapped. The comparative effectiveness of therapies was assessed using network meta-analysis. A threshold analysis was used to identify which comparisons were sensitive to potential changes in the evidence. Where comparisons based on randomised controlled trial evidence were not robust or no randomised controlled trials were identified, a targeted systematic review of non-randomised, prospective comparative studies provided additional data for repeat network meta-analysis and threshold analysis. The feasibility of undertaking economic modelling was explored. A workshop with patients and clinicians was held to discuss the findings and identify key priorities for future research.

Results

Thirty-seven randomised controlled trials (with over 3700 relevant patients) were included in the review. The majority were conducted in China or Japan and most had a high risk of bias or some risk of bias concerns. The results of the network meta-analysis were uncertain for most comparisons. There was evidence that percutaneous ethanol injection is inferior to radiofrequency ablation for overall survival (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% credible interval 1.16 to 1.82), progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% credible interval 1.11 to 1.67), overall recurrence (relative risk 1.19, 95% credible interval 1.02 to 1.39) and local recurrence (relative risk 1.80, 95% credible interval 1.19 to 2.71). Percutaneous acid injection was also inferior to radiofrequency ablation for progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.63, 95% credible interval 1.05 to 2.51). Threshold analysis showed that further evidence could plausibly change the result for some comparisons. Fourteen eligible non-randomised studies were identified (n ≥ 2316); twelve had a high risk of bias so were not included in updated network meta-analyses. Additional non-randomised data, made available by a clinical advisor, were also included (n = 303). There remained a high level of uncertainty in treatment rankings after the network meta-analyses were updated. However, the updated analyses suggested that microwave ablation and resection are superior to percutaneous ethanol injection and percutaneous acid injection for some outcomes. Further research on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy was recommended at the workshop, although it is only appropriate for certain patient subgroups, limiting opportunities for adequately powered trials.

Limitations

Many studies were small and of poor quality. No comparative studies were found for some therapies.

Conclusions

The existing evidence base has limitations; the uptake of specific ablative therapies in the United Kingdom appears to be based more on technological advancements and ease of use than strong evidence of clinical effectiveness. However, there is evidence that percutaneous ethanol injection and percutaneous acid injection are inferior to radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation and resection.

Study registration

PROSPERO CRD42020221357.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131224) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 29. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Incomplete radiofrequency ablation following transarterial chemoembolization accelerates the progression of large hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose

To examine post-operative progression and risk impact of insufficient radiofrequency ablation (RFA) following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the prognosis of large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and Methods

From January 2014 to January 2021 were analyzed. A total of 343 patients with large HCC (diameter >5 cm) who received TACE combined with RFA were enrolled and were divided into two groups: complete ablation (CA, n = 172) and insufficient ablation (IA, n = 171). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined by the Kaplan-Meier curve and compared with the log-rank test. To find parameters influencing OS and PFS, clinicopathological variables underwent univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and PFS rates of the CA group were significantly higher than that of the IA group (P < 0.001). 25 (41%) patients in local tumor progression (LTP), 36 (59%) in intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR), and 0 (0%) in extrahepatic distant recurrence (EDR) in the CA group. 51 (32.1%) patients in LTP, 96 (60.4%) patients in IDR, and 12 (7.5%) cases in EDR in the IA group. The recurrence patterns of the two groups were statistically significant difference (P = 0.039). In multivariate analysis, inadequate ablation and conjunction with TKIs were both significant risk factors for OS and PFS. Apart from these, older age and >7 cm of tumor size were indicators of poor OS and multiple tumors were indicators of poor PFS.

Conclusion

Insufficient ablation causes a poor survival outcome of TACE combined with RFA for large HCC, particularly, which can promote IDR.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and sequential ablation in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple therapeutic method (Hepatic Aarterial Infusion Chemotherapy-HAIC, lenvatinib and sequential ablation) in the treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma (Ad-HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 2018 to June 2021, data from 150 consecutive Ad-HCC patients were collected. All patients received HAIC combined with lenvatinib (H-L group, n = 97) or HAIC combined with lenvatinib and sequential ablation (H-L-A group, n = 53). Complications, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and intrahepatic progression-free survival (IPFS) were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences of baseline characteristics were found between groups. The time of median follow-up was 17.8 months (range, 6.8, 37.6 months). In comparison to the H-L group, the H-L-A group patients showed significantly longer median OS (>30 months vs 13.6 months, respectively; p = 0.010), PFS (12.8 vs. 5.6 months, respectively; p < 0.001), and IPFS (14.6 vs. 6.8 months, respectively; p = 0.002). According to the results from uni- and multivariable analyses, we considered α-fetoprotein and treatment modality as two survival independent prognostic factors. No significant change of the complication incidences was observed between H-L group and H-L-A group (12.4% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.890).

CONCLUSION

Compared to HAIC combined with lenvatinib only, HAIC combined with lenvatinib and sequential ablation was safer and more effective, improving survival outcomes of Ad-HCC patients. A prospective study will be designed validate the retrospective results.

Clinical Efficacy of Interventional Chemotherapy Embolization Combined with Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation on Patients with Liver Cancer

Due to the greater prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection, liver tumor is especially popular in China. In China, it is the 4th most prevalent tumor and the 3rd main reason for cancer fatalities. Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) account for more than 91% of every liver tumor case, and chemotherapy and immunotherapy are the better therapy choices. It is a serious threat to the lives and health of Chinese citizens. Patients diagnosed with liver tumors have a bad prognosis. Surgical resection, liver transplantation, chemotherapeutic embolization, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are all choices for patients who are detected early. More effective therapies can result in a better prognosis. This paper analyzes the clinical efficiency of interventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) integrated with monopolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on patients with a liver tumor. Initially, the dataset is collected and the patients are treated with combined TACE and RFA. The computed tomography (CT) images are obtained using three-phase CT imaging. The images are segmented using adaptive U-Net-based segmentation. The clinical efficiency of the patients is evaluated using Robust Residual Convolutional Neural Network (RR-CNN) which is optimized using Firefly Particle Swarm Optimization (FPSO) algorithm. The performance of the system is analyzed using the MATLAB simulation tool. In performance analysis, the proposed method of RR-CNN is high when compared to the existing method of CNN, logistic regression using genetic algorithm and KNN in overall parameters are accuracy, sensitivity, F1-score, and specificity. These integrated treatments have a suggested greater response frequency, indicating a synergistic impact by combination treatment in the initial stages.

Multi-Task Deep Learning Approach for Simultaneous Objective Response Prediction and Tumor Segmentation in HCC Patients with Transarterial Chemoembolization

This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based model to simultaneously perform the objective response (OR) and tumor segmentation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment. A total of 248 patients from two hospitals were retrospectively included and divided into the training, internal validation, and external testing cohort. A network consisting of an encoder pathway, a prediction pathway, and a segmentation pathway was developed, and named multi-DL (multi-task deep learning), using contrast-enhanced CT images as input. We compared multi-DL with other deep learning-based OR prediction and tumor segmentation methods to explore the incremental value of introducing the interconnected task into a unified network. Additionally, the clinical model was developed using multivariate logistic regression to predict OR. Results showed that multi-DL could achieve the highest AUC of 0.871 in OR prediction and the highest dice coefficient of 73.6% in tumor segmentation. Furthermore, multi-DL can successfully perform the risk stratification that the low-risk and high-risk patients showed a significant difference in survival (p = 0.006). In conclusion, the proposed method may provide a useful tool for therapeutic regime selection in clinical practice.

Locoregional Combined With Systemic Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Inevitable Trend of Rapid Development

Despite the application of antiviral drugs and improved surveillance tools, the number of patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at an advanced stage and with a dismal prognosis is still on the rise. Systemic treatment with multiple multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as sorafenib, has been a widely utilized approach for a decade. In addition, the use of a combination of TKIs with other types of compounds, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antiangiogenic inhibitors, has shown efficacy in treating advanced HCC. However, the presence of intolerable adverse events, low disease response and control rates, and relative short overall survival of such combinatory therapies makes novel or optimized therapies for advance HCC urgently needed. Locoregional therapy (transarterial chemoembolization, and thermal ablation) can destroy primary tumors and decrease tumor burden and is widely used for HCC management. This type of treatment modality can result in local hypoxia and increased vascular permeability, inducing immunogenic effects by releasing tumor antigens from dying cancer cells and producing damage-associated molecular patterns that facilitate antiangiogenic therapy and antitumor immunity. The combination of systemic and locoregional therapies may further produce synergistic effects without overlapping toxicity that can improve prognoses for advanced HCC. In preliminary studies, several combinations of therapeutic modes exhibited promising levels of safety, feasibility, and antitumor effects in a clinical setting and have, thus, garnered much attention. This review aims to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date overview of the underlying mechanisms of combined systemic and locoregional therapies in the treatment of advanced HCC, commenting on both their current status and future direction.

Optimized nerve block techniques while performing percutaneous hepatic ablation:

Percutaneous image guided thermal ablation has become a cornerstone of therapy for patients with oligometastatic disease and primary liver malignancies. Evolving from percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), thermal ablation utilizing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) have become the standard approach in the treatment of isolated lesions that fit within the size criteria for curative intent therapy (typically 3-4cm). With the evolution of more intense thermal ablation, such as MWA, the dramatic increase in both the size of ablation zone and intensity of heat generation have extended the limits of this technique. As a result of these innovations, intra-procedural and post-procedural pain have also significantly increased, requiring either higher levels of intravenous sedation or, in some institutions, general anesthesia. In addition to the increase in therapeutic intensity, the use of intravenous sedation during aggressive ablation procedures carries the risk of over-sedation when the noxious insult (i.e. the ablation) is removed, adding further difficulty to post-procedural recovery and management. Furthermore, high subdiaphragmatic lesions become challenging in this setting due to issues relating to sedation and compliance with breath hold/breathing instructions. Although general anesthesia may mitigate these complications, the added resources associated with providing general anesthesia during ablation is not cost effective and may result in substantial delays in treatment. The reduction of Aerosol Generating Medical Procedures (AGMP), such as intubation due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, must also be taken into consideration. Due to the potential increased risk of infection transmission, alternatives to general anesthesia should be considered when safe and possible. Upper abdominal regional nerve block techniques have been used to manage pain related to trauma, surgery, and cancer; however, blocks of this nature are not well described in the interventional radiology literature. The McGill University group has developed experience in using such blocks as splanchnic, celiac and hepatic hilar nerve blocks to provide peri-procedural pain control [1]. Since incorporating these techniques (along with hydrodissection with tumescent anesthesia), we have also observed in our high volume ablation center a dramatic decrease in the amount of sedatives administered during the procedure, a decrease in patient discomfort during localization and ablation, as well as decreased pain post-procedure. Faster time to discharge and overall reduction in room procedural time serve as added benefits. The purpose of this publication is to outline and illustrate the practical application and use of nerve block/regional anesthesia techniques with respect to percutaneous hepatic thermal ablation.