1
|
Lin Z, Wang T, Li Q, Bi Q, Wang Y, Luo Y, Feng F, Xiao M, Gu Y, Qiang J, Li H. Development and validation of MRI-based radiomics model to predict recurrence risk in patients with endometrial cancer: a multicenter study. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:5814-5824. [PMID: 37171486 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09685-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a fusion model based on clinicopathological factors and MRI radiomics features for the prediction of recurrence risk in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS A total of 421 patients with histopathologically proved EC (101 recurrence vs. 320 non-recurrence EC) from four medical centers were included in this retrospective study, and were divided into the training (n = 235), internal validation (n = 102), and external validation (n = 84) cohorts. In total, 1702 radiomics features were respectively extracted from areas with different extensions for each patient. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier was applied to establish the clinicopathological model (CM), radiomics model (RM), and fusion model (FM). The performance of the established models was assessed by the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to further determine the prognostic value of the models by evaluating the differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the high- and low-risk patients of recurrence. RESULTS The FMs showed better performance compared with the models based on clinicopathological or radiomics features alone but with a reduced tendency when the peritumoral area (PA) was extended. The FM based on intratumoral area (IA) [FM (IA)] had the optimal performance in predicting the recurrence risk in terms of the ROC, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that high-risk patients of recurrence defined by FM (IA) had a worse RFS than low-risk ones of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The FM integrating intratumoral radiomics features and clinicopathological factors could be a valuable predictor for the recurrence risk of EC patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT An accurate prediction based on our developed FM (IA) for the recurrence risk of EC could facilitate making an individualized therapeutic decision and help avoid under- or over-treatment, therefore improving the prognosis of patients. KEY POINTS • The fusion model combined clinicopathological factors and radiomics features exhibits the highest performance compared with the clinicopathological model and radiomics model. • Although higher values of area under the curve were observed for all fusion models, the performance tended to decrease with the extension of the peritumoral region. • Identifying patients with different risks of recurrence, the developed models can be used to facilitate individualized management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zijing Lin
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Ting Wang
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qiong Li
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Qiu Bi
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China
- Department of MRI, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650032, China
| | - Yaoxin Wang
- Department of MRI, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650032, China
| | - Yingwei Luo
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Feng Feng
- Department of Radiology, Nantong Tumor Hospital, Nantong University, Nantong, 226361, China
| | - Meiling Xiao
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China
| | - Yajia Gu
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Jinwei Qiang
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China.
| | - Haiming Li
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kamrava M, Leung E, Bachand F, Beriwal S, Chargari C, D'Souza D, Erickson B, Fokdal L, Han K, Harkenrider M, Lin L, Mahantshetty U, Nesvacil N, Ravi A, Schmid M, Vigneault E, Westerveld H, Yashar C, Nout R. GEC-ESTRO (ACROP)-ABS-CBG Consensus Brachytherapy Target Definition Guidelines for Recurrent Endometrial and Cervical Tumors in the Vagina. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:654-663. [PMID: 36191741 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Representatives from the Gynecologic Groupe European de Curietherapie-European Society for Radiation Therapy and Oncology (GYN GEC-ESTRO), the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and the Canadian Brachytherapy Group (CBG) met to develop international consensus recommendations for target definitions for image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for vaginal recurrences of endometrial or cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Seventeen radiation oncologists and 2 medical physicists participated. Before an in-person meeting each participant anonymously contoured 3 recurrent endometrial/cervical cancer cases. Participants contoured the residual gross primary tumor volume (GTV-Tres), a high-risk clinical target volume (CTV-THR), and an intermediate-risk clinical target volume (CTV-TIR), on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRIs). All contours were drawn using Falcon EduCase. Contours were reviewed at an in-person meeting during which a consensus document was created defining agreed-upon target definitions (Trial 1). After establishing these definitions, the group was sent one of the cases again (recurrent cervical cancer vaginal recurrence) and asked to contour the targets again (Trial 2). The Computerized Environment for Radiation Research (CERR) software (The Mathworks, Natwick, MA) was used to analyze the contours. Kappa statistics were generated to assess level of agreement between contours. A conformity index (CI), defined as the ratio between the intersection and union volume of a given pair of contours, was calculated. A simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) contour was created for the CTV-THR and CTV-TIR for the postmeeting case. RESULTS Consensus definitions for GTV-Tres, CTV-THR, and CTV-TIR were established. Kappa statistics (Trial 1/Trial 2) for GTV-Tres, CTV-THR, and CTV-TIR were 0.536/0.583, 0.575/0.743 and 0.522/0.707. Kappa statistics for Trial 2 for the CTV-THR and CTV-TIR showed "substantial" agreement while the GTV-Tres remained at moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS This consensus provides recommendations to facilitate future collaborations for MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy target definitions in endometrial/cervical vaginal recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric Leung
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Ontario
| | | | - Sushil Beriwal
- Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | - Kathy Han
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lilie Lin
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Nicole Nesvacil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Max Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Eric Vigneault
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Remi Nout
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maheshwari E, Nougaret S, Stein EB, Rauch GM, Hwang KP, Stafford RJ, Klopp AH, Soliman PT, Maturen KE, Rockall AG, Lee SI, Sadowski EA, Venkatesan AM. Update on MRI in Evaluation and Treatment of Endometrial Cancer. Radiographics 2022; 42:2112-2130. [PMID: 36018785 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the second most common gynecologic cancer worldwide and the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, with an increasing incidence in high-income countries. Although the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial cancer is a surgical staging system, contemporary published evidence-based data and expert opinions recommend MRI for treatment planning as it provides critical diagnostic information on tumor size and depth, extent of myometrial and cervical invasion, extrauterine extent, and lymph node status, all of which are essential in choosing the most appropriate therapy. Multiparametric MRI using a combination of T2-weighted sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging, and multiphase contrast-enhanced imaging is the mainstay for imaging assessment of endometrial cancer. Identification of important prognostic factors at MRI improves both treatment selection and posttreatment follow-up. MRI also plays a crucial role for fertility-preserving strategies and in patients who are not surgical candidates by helping guide therapy and identify procedural complications. This review is a product of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel and reflects a multidisciplinary international collaborative effort to summarize updated information highlighting the role of MRI for endometrial cancer depiction and delineation, treatment planning, and follow-up. The article includes information regarding dedicated MRI protocols, tips for MRI reporting, imaging pitfalls, and strategies for image quality optimization. The roles of MRI-guided radiation therapy, hybrid PET/MRI, and advanced MRI techniques that are applicable to endometrial cancer imaging are also discussed. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekta Maheshwari
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Stephanie Nougaret
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Erica B Stein
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Gaiane M Rauch
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Ken-Pin Hwang
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - R Jason Stafford
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Ann H Klopp
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Pamela T Soliman
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Andrea G Rockall
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Susanna I Lee
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Elizabeth A Sadowski
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.B.S., K.E.M.); Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging (G.M.R., A.M.V.), Department of Imaging Physics (K.P.H., R.J.S.), Department of Radiation Oncology (A.H.K.), and Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine (P.T.S.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.I.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (E.A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|