Characterization of solid renal neoplasms using MRI-based quantitative radiomics features

Characterization of renal masses with MRI-based radiomics: assessment of inter-package and inter-observer reproducibility in a prospective pilot study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate radiomics features' reproducibility using inter-package/inter-observer measurement analysis in renal masses (RMs) based on MRI and to employ machine learning (ML) models for RM characterization.

METHODS

32 Patients (23M/9F; age 61.8 ± 10.6 years) with RMs (25 renal cell carcinomas (RCC)/7 benign masses; mean size, 3.43 ± 1.73 cm) undergoing resection were prospectively recruited. All patients underwent 1.5 T MRI with T2-weighted (T2-WI), diffusion-weighted (DWI)/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and pre-/post-contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1-WI). RMs were manually segmented using volume of interest (VOI) on T2-WI, DWI/ADC, and T1-WI pre-/post-contrast imaging (1-min, 3-min post-injection) by two independent observers using two radiomics software packages for inter-package and inter-observer assessments of shape/histogram/texture features common to both packages (104 features; n = 26 patients). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess inter-observer and inter-package reproducibility of radiomics measurements [good (ICC ≥ 0.8)/moderate (ICC = 0.5-0.8)/poor (ICC < 0.5)]. ML models were employed using reproducible features (between observers and packages, ICC > 0.8) to distinguish RCC from benign RM.

RESULTS

Inter-package comparisons demonstrated that radiomics features from T1-WI-post-contrast had the highest proportion of good/moderate ICCs (54.8-58.6% for T1-WI-1 min), while most features extracted from T2-WI, T1-WI-pre-contrast, and ADC exhibited poor ICCs. Inter-observer comparisons found that radiomics measurements from T1-WI pre/post-contrast and T2-WI had the greatest proportion of features with good/moderate ICCs (95.3-99.1% T1-WI-post-contrast 1-min), while ADC measurements yielded mostly poor ICCs. ML models generated an AUC of 0.71 [95% confidence interval = 0.67-0.75] for diagnosis of RCC vs. benign RM.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics features extracted from T1-WI-post-contrast demonstrated greater inter-package and inter-observer reproducibility compared to ADC, with fair accuracy for distinguishing RCC from benign RM.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Knowledge of reproducibility of MRI radiomics features obtained on renal masses will aid in future study design and may enhance the diagnostic utility of radiomics models for renal mass characterization.

Molecular imaging for non-invasive risk stratification of renal masses

Anatomic imaging with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has long been the mainstay of renal mass characterization. However, those modalities are often unable to adequately characterize indeterminate, solid, enhancing renal masses - with some exceptions, such as the development of the clear-cell likelihood score on multi-parametric MRI. As such, molecular imaging approaches have gained traction as an alternative to anatomic imaging. Mitochondrial imaging with 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography/CT is a cost-effective means of non-invasively identifying oncocytomas and other indolent renal masses. On the other end of the spectrum, carbonic anhydrase IX agents, most notably the monoclonal antibody girentuximab - which can be labeled with positron emission tomography radionuclides such as zirconium-89 - are effective at identifying renal masses that are likely to be aggressive clear cell renal cell carcinomas. Renal mass biopsy, which has a relatively high non-diagnostic rate and does not definitively characterize many oncocytic neoplasms, nonetheless may play an important role in any algorithm targeted to renal mass risk stratification. The combination of molecular imaging and biopsy in selected patients with other advanced imaging methods, such as artificial intelligence/machine learning and the abstraction of radiomics features, offers the optimal way forward for maximization of the information to be gained from risk stratification of indeterminate renal masses. With the proper application of those methods, inappropriately aggressive therapy for benign and indolent renal masses may be curtailed.

The evolving management of small renal masses

Small renal masses (SRMs) are a heterogeneous group of tumours with varying metastatic potential. The increasing use and improving quality of abdominal imaging have led to increasingly early diagnosis of incidental SRMs that are asymptomatic and organ confined. Despite improvements in imaging and the growing use of renal mass biopsy, diagnosis of malignancy before treatment remains challenging. Management of SRMs has shifted away from radical nephrectomy, with active surveillance and nephron-sparing surgery taking over as the primary modalities of treatment. The optimal treatment strategy for SRMs continues to evolve as factors affecting short-term and long-term outcomes in this patient cohort are elucidated through studies from prospective data registries. Evidence from rapidly evolving research in biomarkers, imaging modalities, and machine learning shows promise in improving understanding of the biology and management of this patient cohort.

ASD-Net: a novel U-Net based asymmetric spatial-channel convolution network for precise kidney and kidney tumor image segmentation

Early intervention in tumors can greatly improve human survival rates. With the development of deep learning technology, automatic image segmentation has taken a prominent role in the field of medical image analysis. Manually segmenting kidneys on CT images is a tedious task, and due to the diversity of these images and varying technical skills of professionals, segmentation results can be inconsistent. To address this problem, a novel ASD-Net network is proposed in this paper for kidney and kidney tumor segmentation tasks. First, the proposed network employs newly designed Adaptive Spatial-channel Convolution Optimization (ASCO) blocks to capture anisotropic information in the images. Then, other newly designed blocks, i.e., Dense Dilated Enhancement Convolution (DDEC) blocks, are utilized to enhance feature propagation and reuse it across the network, thereby improving its segmentation accuracy. To allow the network to segment complex and small kidney tumors more effectively, the Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) module is incorporated in its middle layer. With its generalized pyramid feature, this module enables the network to better capture and understand context information at various scales within the images. In addition to this, the concurrent spatial and channel squeeze & excitation (scSE) attention mechanism is adopted to better comprehend and manage context information in the images. Additional encoding layers are also added to the base (U-Net) and connected to the original encoding layer through skip connections. The resultant enhanced U-Net structure allows for better extraction and merging of high-level and low-level features, further boosting the network's ability to restore segmentation details. In addition, the combined Binary Cross Entropy (BCE)-Dice loss is utilized as the network's loss function. Experiments, conducted on the KiTS19 dataset, demonstrate that the proposed ASD-Net network outperforms the existing segmentation networks according to all evaluation metrics used, except for recall in the case of kidney tumor segmentation, where it takes the second place after Attention-UNet.

Style Transfer-assisted Deep Learning Method for Kidney Segmentation at Multiphase MRI

Purpose

To develop and validate a semisupervised style transfer-assisted deep learning method for automated segmentation of the kidneys using multiphase contrast-enhanced (MCE) MRI acquisitions.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, institutional review board-approved study included 125 patients (mean age, 57.3 years; 67 male, 58 female) with renal masses. Cohort 1 consisted of 102 coronal T2-weighted MRI acquisitions and 27 MCE MRI acquisitions during the corticomedullary phase. Cohort 2 comprised 92 MCE MRI acquisitions (23 acquisitions during four phases each, including precontrast, corticomedullary, early nephrographic, and nephrographic phases). The kidneys were manually segmented on T2-weighted images. A cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) was trained to generate anatomically coregistered synthetic corticomedullary style images using T2-weighted images as input. Synthetic images for precontrast, early nephrographic, and nephrographic phases were then generated using the synthetic corticomedullary images as input. Mask region-based convolutional neural networks were trained on the four synthetic phase series for kidney segmentation using T2-weighted masks. Segmentation performance was evaluated in a different cohort of 20 originally acquired MCE MRI examinations by using Dice and Jaccard scores.

Results

The CycleGAN network successfully generated anatomically coregistered synthetic MCE MRI-like datasets from T2-weighted acquisitions. The proposed deep learning approach for kidney segmentation achieved high mean Dice scores in all four phases of the original MCE MRI acquisitions (0.91 for precontrast, 0.92 for corticomedullary, 0.91 for early nephrographic, and 0.93 for nephrographic).

Conclusion

The proposed deep learning approach achieved high performance in kidney segmentation on different MCE MRI acquisitions.Keywords: Kidney Segmentation, Generative Adversarial Network, CycleGAN, Convolutional Neural Network, Transfer Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

CT-derived textural analysis parameters discriminate high-attenuation renal cysts from solid renal neoplasms

AIM

To assess the utility of textural features on computed tomography (CT) to differentiate high-attenuation cysts from solid renal neoplasms among indeterminate renal lesions detected incidentally on CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were included if they had an indeterminate renal lesion on CT that was subsequently characterised on ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Up to three lesions per patient were included if they had a size ≥10 mm and density of 20-70 HU on unenhanced CT or any single phase of contrast-enhanced CT. Cases were categorised as benign or most likely benign cysts (Bosniak II and IIF) versus indeterminate (Bosniak III), mixed solid and cystic (Bosniak IV), or solid renal lesions. A random forest model was generated using 95 textural parameters and four clinical parameters for each lesion.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-four patients were included who had a total of 278 lesions. Of these, 193 (69%) were benign or most likely benign cysts and 85 (31%) were indeterminate, mixed cystic and solid, or solid renal lesions. The random forest model had an area under the curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65, 0.78), with a sensitivity and specificity of 81.2% and 38.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A multivariate model including textural and clinical parameters had moderate overall performance for discriminating benign or likely benign cysts from indeterminate, mixed solid and cystic, or solid renal lesions. This study serves as a proof of concept and may reduce the need for further follow-up by characterising a significant portion of indeterminate lesions on CT as benign.

Insights into Renal Cell Carcinoma with Novel Imaging Approaches

This article presents a comprehensive overview of new imaging approaches and techniques for improving the assessment of renal masses and renal cell carcinoma. The Bosniak classification, version 2019, as well as the clear cell likelihood score, version 2.0, will be discussed as new imaging algorithms using established techniques. Additionally, newer modalities, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, dual energy computed tomography, and molecular imaging, will be discussed in conjunction with emerging radiomics and artificial intelligence techniques. Current diagnostic algorithms combined with newer approaches may be an effective way to overcome existing limitations in renal mass and RCC characterization.

Semiautomated segmentation of hepatocellular carcinoma tumors with MRI using convolutional neural networks

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for semiautomated segmentation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors on MRI.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 292 patients (237 M/55F, mean age 61 years) with pathologically confirmed HCC between 08/2015 and 06/2019 and who underwent MRI before surgery. The dataset was randomly divided into training (n = 195), validation (n = 66), and test sets (n = 31). Volumes of interest (VOIs) were manually placed on index lesions by 3 independent radiologists on different sequences (T2-weighted imaging [WI], T1WI pre-and post-contrast on arterial [AP], portal venous [PVP], delayed [DP, 3 min post-contrast] and hepatobiliary phases [HBP, when using gadoxetate], and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]). Manual segmentation was used as ground truth to train and validate a CNN-based pipeline. For semiautomated segmentation of tumors, we selected a random pixel inside the VOI, and the CNN provided two outputs: single slice and volumetric outputs. Segmentation performance and inter-observer agreement were analyzed using the 3D Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).

RESULTS

A total of 261 HCCs were segmented on the training/validation sets, and 31 on the test set. The median lesion size was 3.0 cm (IQR 2.0-5.2 cm). Mean DSC (test set) varied depending on the MRI sequence with a range between 0.442 (ADC) and 0.778 (high b-value DWI) for single-slice segmentation; and between 0.305 (ADC) and 0.667 (T1WI pre) for volumetric-segmentation. Comparison between the two models showed better performance in single-slice segmentation, with statistical significance on T2WI, T1WI-PVP, DWI, and ADC. Inter-observer reproducibility of segmentation analysis showed a mean DSC of 0.71 in lesions between 1 and 2 cm, 0.85 in lesions between 2 and 5 cm, and 0.82 in lesions > 5 cm.

CONCLUSION

CNN models have fair to good performance for semiautomated HCC segmentation, depending on the sequence and tumor size, with better performance for the single-slice approach. Refinement of volumetric approaches is needed in future studies.

KEY POINTS

• Semiautomated single-slice and volumetric segmentation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) models provided fair to good performance for hepatocellular carcinoma segmentation on MRI. • CNN models' performance for HCC segmentation accuracy depends on the MRI sequence and tumor size, with the best results on diffusion-weighted imaging and T1-weighted imaging pre-contrast, and for larger lesions.

Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map-Based First- and High-Order Radiomic Features for the Discrimination of Sacral Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas With Overlapping Conventional Imaging Features

PURPOSE

Chondrosarcomas arise from the lateral pelvis; however, midline chondrosarcomas (10%) display similar imaging features to chordoma, causing a diagnostic challenge. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-based radiomic features and two novel diffusion indices for differentiating sacral chordomas and chondrosarcomas.

METHODS

A retrospective, multireader review was performed of 82 pelvic MRIs (42 chordomas and 40 chondrosarcomas) between December 2014 and September 2021, split into training (n = 69) and validation (n = 13) data sets. Lesions were segmented on a single slice from ADC maps. Eight first-order features (minimum, mean, median, and maximum ADC, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy) and two novel indices: restriction index (RI, proportion of lesions with restricted diffusion) and facilitation index (FI, proportion of lesions with facilitated diffusion) were estimated. One hundred seven radiomic features comparing patients with chondrosarcoma versus chordoma were sorted based on mean group differences.

RESULTS

There was good to excellent interobserver reliability for eight of the 10 ADC metrics on the training data set. Significant differences were observed (P < .005) for RI, FI, median, mean, and skewness using the training data set. Optimal cutpoints for diagnosis of chordoma were RI > 0.015; FI < 0.25; mean ADC < 1.7 × 10-3 mm2/s; and skewness >0.177. The optimal decision tree relied on FI. In a secondary analysis, significant differences (P < .00047) in chondrosarcoma versus chordoma were found in 18 of 107 radiomic features, including six first-order and 12 high-order features.

CONCLUSION

The novel ADC index, FI, in addition to ADC mean, skewness, and 12 high-order radiomic features, could help differentiate sacral chordomas from chondrosarcomas.

MR Virtual Biopsy of Solid Renal Masses: An Algorithmic Approach

Between 1983 and 2002, the incidence of solid renal tumors increased from 7.1 to 10.8 cases per 100,000. This is in large part due to the increase in the volume of ultrasound and cross-sectional imaging, although a majority of solid renal tumors are still found incidentally. Ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) have been the mainstay of renal mass screening and diagnosis but recent advances in magnetic resonance (MR) technology have made this the optimal choice when diagnosing and staging renal tumors. Our purpose in writing this review is to survey the modern MR imaging approach to benign and malignant solid renal tumors, consolidate the various imaging findings into an easy-to-read reference, and provide an imaging-based, algorithmic approach to renal mass characterization for clinicians. MR is at the forefront of renal mass characterization, surpassing ultrasound and CT in its ability to describe multiple tissue parameters and predict tumor biology. Cutting-edge MR protocols and the integration of diagnostic algorithms can improve patient outcomes, allowing the imager to narrow the differential and better guide oncologic and surgical management.

Multiparametric MRI of Solid Renal Masses: Principles and Applications of Advanced Quantitative and Functional Methods for Tumor Diagnosis and Characterization

Solid renal masses (SRMs) are increasingly detected and encompass both benign and malignant masses, with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) being the most common malignant SRM. Most patients with SRMs will undergo management without a priori pathologic confirmation. There is an unmet need to noninvasively diagnose and characterize RCCs, as significant variability in clinical behavior is observed and a wide range of differing management options exist. Cross-sectional imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are increasingly used for SRM characterization. Multiparametric (mp) MRI techniques can provide insight into tumor biology by probing different physiologic/pathophysiologic processes noninvasively. These include sequences that probe tissue microstructure, including intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) and T₁ relaxometry; oxygen metabolism (blood oxygen level dependent [BOLD-MRI]); as well as vascular flow and perfusion (dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [DCE-MRI] and arterial spin labeling [ASL]). In this review, we will discuss each mpMRI method in terms of its principles, roles, and discuss the results of human studies for SRM assessment. Future validation of these methods may help to enable a personalized management approach for patients with SRM in the emerging era of precision medicine. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 2.

Deep-learning-based ensemble method for fully automated detection of renal masses on magnetic resonance images

Purpose

Accurate detection of small renal masses (SRM) is a fundamental step for automated classification of benign and malignant or indolent and aggressive renal tumors. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) may outperform computed tomography (CT) for SRM subtype differentiation due to improved tissue characterization, but is less explored compared to CT. The objective of this study is to autonomously detect SRM on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images (CE-MRI).

Approach

In this paper, we described a novel, fully automated methodology for accurate detection and localization of SRM on CE-MRI. We first determine the kidney boundaries using a U-Net convolutional neural network. We then search for SRM within the localized kidney regions using a mixture-of-experts ensemble model based on the U-Net architecture. Our dataset contained CE-MRI scans of 118 patients with different solid kidney tumor subtypes including renal cell carcinomas, oncocytomas, and fat-poor renal angiomyolipoma. We evaluated the proposed model on the entire CE-MRI dataset using 5-fold cross validation.

Results

The developed algorithm reported a Dice similarity coefficient of 91.20 ± 5.41 % (mean ± standard deviation) for kidney segmentation from 118 volumes consisting of 25,025 slices. Our proposed ensemble model for SRM detection yielded a recall and precision of 86.2% and 83.3% on the entire CE-MRI dataset, respectively.

Conclusions

We described a deep-learning-based method for fully automated SRM detection using CE-MR images, which has not been studied previously. The results are clinically important as SRM localization is a pre-step for fully automated diagnosis of SRM subtypes.

Radiogenomics in Renal Cancer Management-Current Evidence and Future Prospects

Renal cancer management is challenging from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up. In cases of small renal masses and cystic lesions the differential diagnosis of benign or malignant tissues has potential pitfalls when imaging or even renal biopsy is applied. The recent artificial intelligence, imaging techniques, and genomics advancements have the ability to help clinicians set the stratification risk, treatment selection, follow-up strategy, and prognosis of the disease. The combination of radiomics features and genomics data has achieved good results but is currently limited by the retrospective design and the small number of patients included in clinical trials. The road ahead for radiogenomics is open to new, well-designed prospective studies, with large cohorts of patients required to validate previously obtained results and enter clinical practice.

Differentiation of benign from malignant solid renal lesions using CT-based radiomics and machine learning: comparison with radiologist interpretation

PURPOSE

To assess the performance of a machine learning model trained with contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomics features in distinguishing benign from malignant solid renal masses and to compare model performance with three abdominal radiologists.

METHODS

Patients who underwent intra-operative ultrasound during a partial nephrectomy were identified within our institutional database, and those who had pre-operative contrast-enhanced CT examinations were selected. The renal masses were segmented from the CT images and radiomics features were derived from the segmentations. The pathology of each mass was identified; masses were labeled as either benign [oncocytoma or angiomyolipoma (AML)] or malignant [clear cell, papillary, or chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC)] depending on the pathology. The data were parsed into a 70/30 train/test split and a random forest machine learning model was developed to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. Three radiologists assessed the cohort of masses and labeled cases as benign or malignant.

RESULTS

148 masses were identified from the cohort, including 50 benign lesions (23 AMLs, 27 oncocytomas) and 98 malignant lesions (23 clear cell RCC, 44 papillary RCC, and 31 chromophobe RCCs). The machine learning algorithm yielded an overall accuracy of 0.82 for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.80. In comparison, the three radiologists had significantly lower accuracies (p = 0.02) ranging from 0.67 to 0.75.

CONCLUSION

A machine learning model trained with CT-based radiomics features can provide superior accuracy for distinguishing benign from malignant solid renal masses compared to abdominal radiologists.

AI-Driven Robust Kidney and Renal Mass Segmentation and Classification on 3D CT Images

Early intervention in kidney cancer helps to improve survival rates. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is often used to diagnose renal masses. In clinical practice, the manual segmentation and quantification of organs and tumors are expensive and time-consuming. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown a significant advantage in assisting cancer diagnosis. To reduce the workload of manual segmentation and avoid unnecessary biopsies or surgeries, in this paper, we propose a novel end-to-end AI-driven automatic kidney and renal mass diagnosis framework to identify the abnormal areas of the kidney and diagnose the histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The proposed framework first segments the kidney and renal mass regions by a 3D deep learning architecture (Res-UNet), followed by a dual-path classification network utilizing local and global features for the subtype prediction of the most common RCCs: clear cell, chromophobe, oncocytoma, papillary, and other RCC subtypes. To improve the robustness of the proposed framework on the dataset collected from various institutions, a weakly supervised learning schema is proposed to leverage the domain gap between various vendors via very few CT slice annotations. Our proposed diagnosis system can accurately segment the kidney and renal mass regions and predict tumor subtypes, outperforming existing methods on the KiTs19 dataset. Furthermore, cross-dataset validation results demonstrate the robustness of datasets collected from different institutions trained via the weakly supervised learning schema.

Artificial intelligence and radiomics in evaluation of kidney lesions: a comprehensive literature review

Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) may increase the differentiation of benign from malignant kidney lesions, differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC), differentiation of oncocytoma from RCC, differentiation of different subtypes of RCC, to predict Fuhrman grade, to predict gene mutation through molecular biomarkers and to predict treatment response in metastatic RCC undergoing immunotherapy. Neural networks analyze imaging data. Statistical, geometrical, textural features derived are giving quantitative data of contour, internal heterogeneity and gray zone features of lesions. A comprehensive literature review was performed, until July 2022. Studies investigating the diagnostic value of radiomics in differentiation of renal lesions, grade prediction, gene alterations, molecular biomarkers and ongoing clinical trials have been analyzed. The application of AI and radiomics could lead to improved sensitivity, specificity, accuracy in detecting and differentiating between renal lesions. Standardization of scanner protocols will improve preoperative differentiation between benign, low-risk cancers and clinically significant renal cancers and holds the premises to enhance the diagnostic ability of imaging tools to characterize renal lesions.

Differentiation of benign from malignant solid renal lesions with MRI-based radiomics and machine learning

BACKGROUND

Solid renal masses are often indeterminate for benignity versus malignancy on magnetic resonance imaging. Such masses are typically evaluated with either percutaneous biopsy or surgical resection. Percutaneous biopsy can be non-diagnostic and some surgically resected lesions are inadvertently benign.

PURPOSE

To assess the performance of ten machine learning (ML) algorithms trained with MRI-based radiomics features in distinguishing benign from malignant solid renal masses.

METHODS

Patients with solid renal masses identified on pre-intervention MRI were curated from our institutional database. Masses with a definitive diagnosis via imaging (for angiomyolipomas) or via biopsy or surgical resection (for oncocytomas or renal cell carcinomas) were selected. Each mass was segmented for both T2- and post-contrast T1-weighted images. Radiomics features were derived from the segmented masses for each imaging sequence. Ten ML algorithms were trained with the radiomics features gleaned from each MR sequence, as well as the combination of MR sequences.

RESULTS

In total, 182 renal masses in 160 patients were included in the study. The support vector machine algorithm trained on radiomics features from T2-weighted images performed superiorly, with an accuracy of 0.80 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79. Linear discriminant analysis (accuracy = 0.84 and AUC = 0.77) and logistic regression (accuracy = 0.78 and AUC = 0.78) algorithms trained on T2-based radiomics features performed similarly. ML algorithms trained on radiomics features from post-contrast T1-weighted images or the combination of radiomics features from T2- and post-contrast T1-weighted images yielded lower performance.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning models trained with radiomics features derived from T2-weighted images can provide high accuracy for distinguishing benign from malignant solid renal masses.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Machine learning models derived from MRI-based radiomics features may improve the clinical management of solid renal masses and have the potential to reduce the frequency with which benign solid renal masses are biopsied or surgically resected.

MRI-Based Radiomics and Urine Creatinine for the Differentiation of Renal Angiomyolipoma With Minimal Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study

Objectives

Standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are different to distinguish minimal fat angiomyolipoma (mf-AML) with minimal fat from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Here we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI-based radiomics in the differentiation of fat-poor AMLs from other renal neoplasms.

Methods

A total of 69 patients with solid renal tumors without macroscopic fat and with a pathologic diagnosis of RCC (n=50) or mf-AML (n=19) who underwent conventional MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) were included. Clinical data including age, sex, tumor location, urine creatinine, and urea nitrogen were collected from medical records. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were measured from renal tumors. We used the ITK-SNAP software to manually delineate the regions of interest on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and IVIM-DWI from the largest cross-sectional area of the tumor. We extracted 396 radiomics features by the Analysis Kit software for each MR sequence. The hand-crafted features were selected by using the Pearson correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Diagnostic models were built by logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed using five-fold cross-validation and the mean area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared between the models to obtain the optimal model for the differentiation of mf-AML and RCC. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the models.

Results

Clinical model based on urine creatinine achieved an AUC of 0.802 (95%CI: 0.761-0.843). IVIM-based model based on f value achieved an AUC of 0.692 (95%CI: 0.627-0.757). T2WI-radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.883 (95%CI: 0.852-0.914). IVIM-radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.874 (95%CI: 0.841-0.907). Combined radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.919 (95%CI: 0.894-0.944). Clinical-radiomics model yielded the best performance, with an AUC of 0.931 (95%CI: 0.907-0.955). The calibration curve and DCA confirmed that the clinical-radiomics model had a good consistency and clinical usefulness.

Conclusion

The clinical-radiomics model may be served as a noninvasive diagnostic tool to differentiate mf-AML with RCC, which might facilitate the clinical decision-making process.

Utility of radiomics features of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: model development and external validation

PURPOSE

To investigate the utility of radiomics features of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) to differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fpAML) from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multi-institutional study included two cohorts with pathologically confirmed renal tumors: 65 patients with ccRCC and 18 with fpAML in the model development cohort, and 17 with ccRCC and 13 with fpAML in the external validation cohort. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including DW-MRI. Radiomics analysis was used to extract 39 imaging features from the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. The radiomics features were analyzed with unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis. A random forest (RF) model was used to identify radiomics features important for differentiating fpAML from ccRCC in the development cohort. The diagnostic performance of the RF model was evaluated in the development and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

The cases in the developmental cohort were classified into three groups with different frequencies of fpAML by cluster analysis of radiomics features. RF analysis of the development cohort showed that the mean ADC value was important for differentiating fpAML from ccRCC, as well as higher-texture features including gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM)_long-run low gray-level enhancement (LRLGE), and GLRLM_low gray-level run emphasis (LGRE). The area under the curve values of the development [0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.00] and validation cohorts (0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.00) were similar (P = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

The radiomics features of ADC maps are useful for differentiating fpAML from ccRCC.

Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Cancer

Artificial intelligence is rapidly expanding into nearly all facets of life, particularly within the field of medicine. The diagnosis, characterization, management, and treatment of kidney cancer is ripe with areas for improvement that may be met with the promises of artificial intelligence. Here, we explore the impact of current research work in artificial intelligence for clinicians caring for patients with renal cancer, with a focus on the perspectives of radiologists, pathologists, and urologists. Promising preliminary results indicate that artificial intelligence may assist in the diagnosis and risk stratification of newly discovered renal masses and help guide the clinical treatment of patients with kidney cancer. However, much of the work in this field is still in its early stages, limited in its broader applicability, and hampered by small datasets, the varied appearance and presentation of kidney cancers, and the intrinsic limitations of the rigidly structured tasks artificial intelligence algorithms are trained to complete. Nonetheless, the continued exploration of artificial intelligence holds promise toward improving the clinical care of patients with kidney cancer.

An Ultrasonic-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses

Objectives

This study was conducted in order to develop and validate an ultrasonic-based radiomics nomogram for diagnosing solid renal masses.

Methods

Six hundred renal solid masses with benign renal lesions (n = 204) and malignant renal tumors (n = 396) were divided into a training set (n = 480) and a validation set (n = 120). Radiomics features were extracted from ultrasound (US) images preoperatively and then a radiomics score (RadScore) was calculated. By integrating the RadScore and independent clinical factors, a radiomics nomogram was constructed. The diagnostic performance of junior physician, senior physician, RadScore, and radiomics nomogram in identifying benign from malignant solid renal masses was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) in both the training and validation sets. The clinical usefulness of the nomogram was assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The radiomics signature model showed satisfactory discrimination in the training set [area under the ROC (AUC), 0.887; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.860–0.915] and the validation set (AUC, 0.874; 95% CI, 0.816–0.932). The radiomics nomogram also demonstrated good calibration and discrimination in the training set (AUC, 0.911; 95% CI, 0.886–0.936) and the validation set (AUC, 0.861; 95% CI, 0.802–0.921). In addition, the radiomics nomogram model showed higher accuracy in discriminating benign and malignant renal masses compared with the evaluations by junior physician (DeLong p = 0.004), and the model also showed significantly higher specificity than the senior and junior physicians (0.93 vs. 0.57 vs. 0.46).

Conclusions

The ultrasonic-based radiomics nomogram shows favorable predictive efficacy in differentiating solid renal masses.

A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with a central scar-matched study

OBJECTIVE

Pre-operative differentiation between renal oncocytoma (RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is critical due to their different clinical behavior and different clinical treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a CT-based radiomics nomogram for the pre-operative differentiation of RO from chRCC.

METHODS

A total of 141 patients (84 in training data set and 57 in external validation data set) with ROs (n = 47) or chRCCs (n = 94) were included. Radiomics features were extracted from tri-phasic enhanced-CT images. A clinical model was developed based on significant patient characteristics and CT imaging features. A radiomics signature model was developed and a radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated. A radiomics nomogram model incorporating the Rad-score and independent clinical factors was developed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance was evaluated and validated in three models using ROC curves.

RESULTS

Twelve features from CT images were selected to develop the radiomics signature. The radiomics nomogram combining a clinical factor (segmental enhancement inversion) and radiomics signature showed an AUC value of 0.988 in the validation set. Decision curve analysis revealed that the diagnostic performance of the radiomics nomogram was better than the clinical model and the radiomics signature.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomics nomogram combining clinical factors and radiomics signature performed well for distinguishing RO from chRCC.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Differential diagnosis between renal oncocytoma (RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is rather difficult by conventional imaging modalities when a central scar was present.A radiomics nomogram integrated with the radiomics signature, demographics, and CT findings facilitates differentiation of RO from chRCC with improved diagnostic efficacy.The CT-based radiomics nomogram might spare unnecessary surgery for RO.

Cross-sectional imaging assessment of renal masses with emphasis on MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful complementary imaging tool for the diagnosis and characterization of renal masses, as it provides both morphologic and functional information. A core MRI protocol for renal imaging should include a T1-weighted sequence with in- and opposed-phase images (or, alternatively with DIXON technique), T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted images as well as a dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence with subtraction images, followed by a delayed post-contrast T1-weighted sequence. The main advantages of MRI over computed tomography include increased sensitivity for contrast enhancement, less sensitivity for detection of calcifications, absence of pseudoenhancement, and lack of radiation exposure. MRI may be applied for renal cystic lesion characterization, differentiation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from benign solid renal tumors, RCC histologic grading, staging, post-treatment follow-up, and active surveillance of patients with treated or untreated RCC.

Differentiating Benign from Malignant Renal Tumors Using T2- and Diffusion-Weighted Images: A Comparison of Deep Learning and Radiomics Models Versus Assessment from Radiologists

BACKGROUND

Differentiating benign from malignant renal tumors is important for selection of the most effective treatment.

PURPOSE

To develop magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based deep learning (DL) models for differentiation of benign and malignant renal tumors and to compare their discrimination performance with the performance of radiomics models and assessment by radiologists.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

A total of 217 patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (N = 173) or a testing cohort (N = 44).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fast spin-echo sequence T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) at 3.0T.

ASSESSMENT

A radiologist manually labeled the region of interest (ROI) on each image. Three DL models using ResNet-18 architecture and three radiomics models using random forest were developed using T2WI alone, DWI alone, and a combination of the two image sets to discriminate between benign and malignant renal tumors. The diagnostic performance of two radiologists was assessed based on professional experience. We also compared the performance of each model and the radiologists.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to assess the performance of each model and the radiologists. P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

RESULTS

The AUC of the DL models based on T2WI, DWI, and the combination was 0.906, 0.846, and 0.925 in the testing cohorts, respectively. The AUC of the combination DL model was significantly better than that of the models based on individual sequences (0.925 > 0.906, 0.925 > 0.846). The AUC of the radiomics models based on T2WI, DWI, and the combination was 0.824, 0.742, and 0.826 in the testing cohorts, respectively. The AUC of two radiologists was 0.724 and 0.667 in the testing cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Thus, the MRI-based DL model is useful for differentiating benign from malignant renal tumors in clinic, and the DL model based on T2WI + DWI had the best performance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Radiomics to better characterize small renal masses

PURPOSE

Radiomics is a specific field of medical research that uses programmable recognition tools to extract objective information from standard images to combine with clinical data, with the aim of improving diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive accuracy beyond standard visual interpretation. We performed a narrative review of radiomic applications that may support improved characterization of small renal masses (SRM). The main focus of the review was to identify and discuss methods which may accurately differentiate benign from malignant renal masses, specifically between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes and from angiomyolipoma without visible fat (fat-poor AML) and oncocytoma. Furthermore, prediction of grade, sarcomatoid features, and gene mutations would be of importance in terms of potential clinical utility in prognostic stratification and selecting personalised patient management strategies.

METHODS

A detailed search of original articles was performed using the PubMed-MEDLINE database until 20 September 2020 to identify the English literature relevant to radiomics applications in renal tumour assessment. In total, 42 articles were included in the analysis in 3 main categories related to SRM: prediction of benign versus malignant SRM, subtypes, and nuclear grade, and other features of aggressiveness.

CONCLUSION

Overall, studies reported the superiority of radiomics over expert radiological assessment, but were mainly of retrospective design and therefore of low-quality evidence. However, it is clear that radiomics is an attractive modality that has the potential to improve the non-invasive diagnostic accuracy of SRM imaging and prediction of its natural behaviour. Further prospective validation studies of radiomics are needed to augment management algorithms of SRM.

Kidney cancer management 3.0: can artificial intelligence make us better?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Artificial intelligence holds tremendous potential for disrupting clinical medicine. Here we review the current role of artificial intelligence in the kidney cancer space.

RECENT FINDINGS

Machine learning and deep learning algorithms have been developed using information extracted from radiomic, histopathologic, and genomic datasets of patients with renal masses.

SUMMARY

Although artificial intelligence applications in medicine are still in their infancy, they already hold immediate promise to improve accuracy of renal mass characterization, grade, and prognostication. As algorithms become more robust and generalizable, artificial intelligence is poised to significantly disrupt kidney cancer care.

Preoperative prediction of the stage, size, grade, and necrosis score in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using MRI-based radiomics

PURPOSE

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common subtype of renal cell carcinoma. Currently, there is a lack of noninvasive methods to stratify ccRCC prognosis prior to any invasive therapies. The purpose of this study was to preoperatively predict the tumor stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score of ccRCC using MRI-based radiomics.

METHODS

A multicenter cohort of 364 histopathologically confirmed ccRCC patients (272 low [< 4] and 92 high [≥ 4] SSIGN score) with preoperative T2-weighted and T1-contrast-enhanced MRI were retrospectively identified and divided into training (254 patients) and testing sets (110 patients). The performance of a manually optimized radiomics model was assessed by measuring accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under precision-recall curve (AUPRC) on an independent test set, which was not included in model training. Lastly, its performance was compared to that of a machine learning pipeline, Tree-Based Pipeline Optimization Tool (TPOT).

RESULTS

The manually optimized radiomics model using Random Forest classification and Analysis of Variance feature selection methods achieved an AUROC of 0.89, AUPRC of 0.81, accuracy of 0.89 (95% CI 0.816-0.937), specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.875-0.984), and sensitivity of 0.72 (95% CI 0.537-0.852) on the test set. The TPOT using Extra Trees Classifier achieved an AUROC of 0.94, AUPRC of 0.83, accuracy of 0.89 (95% CI 0.816-0.937), specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.875-0.984), and sensitivity of 0.72 (95% CI 0.537-0.852) on the test set.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative MR radiomics can accurately predict SSIGN score of ccRCC, suggesting its promise as a prognostic tool that can be used in conjunction with diagnostic markers.

Radiomics in Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Radiomics may answer questions where the conventional interpretation of medical imaging has limitations. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the (current) status of evidence in the application of radiomics in the field of renal masses. We focused on its role in diagnosis, sub-entity discrimination and treatment response assessment in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and benign renal masses. Our quantitative synthesis showed promising results in discrimination of tumor dignity, nevertheless, the value added to human assessment remains unclear and should be the focus of future research. Furthermore, the benefit regarding treatment response assessment remains unclear as well, since the existing studies are investigating already abandoned systemic therapies (ST), which no longer represent the current “reference” standard. Open science could enable to establish technical and clinical validity of radiomic signatures prior to the incorporation of radiomics into everyday clinical practice.

Abstract

Radiomics may increase the diagnostic accuracy of medical imaging for localized and metastatic RCC (mRCC). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Doing so, we comprehensively searched literature databases until May 2020. Studies investigating the diagnostic value of radiomics in differentiation of localized renal tumors and assessment of treatment response to ST in mRCC were included and assessed with respect to their quality using the radiomics quality score (RQS). A total of 113 out of 1098 identified studies met the criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis. Median RQS of all studies was 13.9% (5.0 points, IQR 0.25–7.0 points), and RQS increased over time. Thirty studies were included into the quantitative synthesis: For distinguishing angiomyolipoma, oncocytoma or unspecified benign tumors from RCC, the random effects model showed a log odds ratio (OR) of 2.89 (95%-CI 2.40–3.39, p < 0.001), 3.08 (95%-CI 2.09–4.06, p < 0.001) and 3.57 (95%-CI 2.69–4.45, p < 0.001), respectively. For the general discrimination of benign tumors from RCC log OR was 3.17 (95%-CI 2.73–3.62, p < 0.001). Inhomogeneity of the available studies assessing treatment response in mRCC prevented any meaningful meta-analysis. The application of radiomics seems promising for discrimination of renal tumor dignity. Shared data and open science may assist in improving reproducibility of future studies.