1
|
Carney BW, Larson MC, Corwin MT, Lamba R. Imaging of Hepatobiliary Cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 2023:100964. [PMID: 37321910 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.100964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The liver and biliary tree are common sites of primary and secondary malignancies. MRI followed by CT is the mainstay for the imaging characterization of these malignancies with the dynamically acquired contrast enhanced phases being the most important for diagnosis. The liver imaging reporting and data system classification provides a useful framework for reporting lesions in patents with underlying cirrhosis or who are at high risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma. Detection of metastases is improved with the use of liver specific MRI contrast agents and diffusion weighted sequences. Aside from hepatocellular carcinoma, which is often diagnosed noninvasively, other primary hepatobiliary tumors may require biopsy for definite diagnosis, especially when presenting with nonclassic imaging findings. In this review, we examine the imaging findings of common and less common hepatobiliary tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin W Carney
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California.
| | - Michael C Larson
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California
| | - Michael T Corwin
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California
| | - Ramit Lamba
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ozaki K, Higuchi S, Kimura H, Gabata T. Liver Metastases: Correlation between Imaging Features and Pathomolecular Environments. Radiographics 2022; 42:1994-2013. [PMID: 36149824 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A wide range of imaging manifestations of liver metastases can be encountered, as various primary cancers preferably metastasize to the liver (organ-specific metastases), with the imaging characteristics largely depending on various primary tumor-specific factors such as histopathologic category, degree of tumor differentiation, histologic behavior, and intratumor alterations. Characteristic imaging features potentially can help provide a more precise diagnosis in some clinical settings. These settings include those of (a) primary cancers of hollow organs such as gastrointestinal organs, the lungs, and the bladder, owing to the appearance of metastases that cannot be applied to the liver, which is a parenchymal organ; (b) unknown primary tumors; (c) more than one primary tumor; (d) another emergent malignancy; and (e) transformation to a different histopathologic tumor subtype. The characteristic features include the target sign on T2-weighted MR images or during the hepatobiliary phase of hypovascular metastasis, the peripheral rim washout sign on delayed phase images, peritumor hyperintensity during the hepatobiliary phase, hypervascular metastasis, a cystic appearance with marked hyperintensity on T2-weighted images, marked hyperintensity on T1-weighted images, calcification, capsular retraction, absence of the vessel-penetrating sign, distribution of liver metastases, and rare intraductal forms of metastases. In addition to various factors associated with the primary cancer, desmoplastic reactions around the tumor-which can be observed in adenocarcinomas with peripheral and peritumor enhancement, distinct arterioportal shunts with metastases from pancreatic ductal carcinoma, and pseudocirrhosis-also can affect these findings. The authors review the characteristic imaging findings of liver metastases from various primary cancers, with a focus on the mechanisms that underlie organ-specific liver metastases. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kumi Ozaki
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.O., H.K.) and Pathology (S.H.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka-Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji, Fukui 910-1193, Japan; and Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan (T.G.)
| | - Shohei Higuchi
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.O., H.K.) and Pathology (S.H.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka-Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji, Fukui 910-1193, Japan; and Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan (T.G.)
| | - Hirohiko Kimura
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.O., H.K.) and Pathology (S.H.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka-Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji, Fukui 910-1193, Japan; and Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan (T.G.)
| | - Toshifumi Gabata
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.O., H.K.) and Pathology (S.H.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka-Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji, Fukui 910-1193, Japan; and Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan (T.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chartampilas E, Rafailidis V, Georgopoulou V, Kalarakis G, Hatzidakis A, Prassopoulos P. Current Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163997. [PMID: 36010991 PMCID: PMC9406360 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The role of imaging in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has significantly evolved and expanded beyond the plain radiological confirmation of the tumor based on the typical appearance in a multiphase contrast-enhanced CT or MRI examination. The introduction of hepatobiliary contrast agents has enabled the diagnosis of hepatocarcinogenesis at earlier stages, while the application of ultrasound contrast agents has drastically upgraded the role of ultrasound in the diagnostic algorithms. Newer quantitative techniques assessing blood perfusion on CT and MRI not only allow earlier diagnosis and confident differentiation from other lesions, but they also provide biomarkers for the evaluation of treatment response. As distinct HCC subtypes are identified, their correlation with specific imaging features holds great promise for estimating tumor aggressiveness and prognosis. This review presents the current role of imaging and underlines its critical role in the successful management of patients with HCC. Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Radiology has traditionally played a central role in HCC management, ranging from screening of high-risk patients to non-invasive diagnosis, as well as the evaluation of treatment response and post-treatment follow-up. From liver ultrasonography with or without contrast to dynamic multiple phased CT and dynamic MRI with diffusion protocols, great progress has been achieved in the last decade. Throughout the last few years, pathological, biological, genetic, and immune-chemical analyses have revealed several tumoral subtypes with diverse biological behavior, highlighting the need for the re-evaluation of established radiological methods. Considering these changes, novel methods that provide functional and quantitative parameters in addition to morphological information are increasingly incorporated into modern diagnostic protocols for HCC. In this way, differential diagnosis became even more challenging throughout the last few years. Use of liver specific contrast agents, as well as CT/MRI perfusion techniques, seem to not only allow earlier detection and more accurate characterization of HCC lesions, but also make it possible to predict response to treatment and survival. Nevertheless, several limitations and technical considerations still exist. This review will describe and discuss all these imaging modalities and their advances in the imaging of HCC lesions in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers. Sensitivity and specificity rates, method limitations, and technical considerations will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos Chartampilas
- Radiology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Correspondence:
| | - Vasileios Rafailidis
- Radiology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vivian Georgopoulou
- Radiology Department, Ippokratio General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Kalarakis
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 14152 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Division of Radiology, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 14152 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71500 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Adam Hatzidakis
- Radiology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Panos Prassopoulos
- Radiology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Caruso D, Polici M, Rinzivillo M, Zerunian M, Nacci I, Marasco M, Magi L, Tarallo M, Gargiulo S, Iannicelli E, Annibale B, Laghi A, Panzuto F. CT-based radiomics for prediction of therapeutic response to Everolimus in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Radiol Med 2022; 127:691-701. [PMID: 35717429 PMCID: PMC9308597 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01506-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
To test radiomic approach in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with Everolimus, with the aim to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and death.
Materials and methods
Twenty-five patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, 15/25 pancreatic (60%), 9/25 ileal (36%), 1/25 lung (4%), were retrospectively enrolled between August 2013 and December 2020. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT before starting Everolimus, histological diagnosis, tumor grading, PFS, overall survival (OS), death, and clinical data collected. Population was divided into two groups: responders (PFS ≤ 11 months) and non-responders (PFS > 11 months). 3D segmentation was performed on whole liver of naïve CT scans in arterial and venous phases, using a dedicated software (3DSlicer v4.10.2). A total of 107 radiomic features were extracted and compared between two groups (T test or Mann–Whitney), radiomics performance assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve, Kaplan–Meyer curves used for survival analysis, univariate and multivariate logistic regression performed to predict death, and interobserver variability assessed. All significant radiomic comparisons were validated by using a synthetic external cohort. P < 0.05 is considered significant.
Results
15/25 patients were classified as responders (median PFS 25 months and OS 29 months) and 10/25 as non-responders (median PFS 4.5 months and OS 23 months). Among radiomic parameters, Correlation and Imc1 showed significant differences between two groups (P < 0.05) with the best performance (internal cohort AUC 0.86–0.84, P < 0.0001; external cohort AUC 0.84–0.90; P < 0.0001). Correlation < 0.21 resulted correlated with death at Kaplan–Meyer analysis (P = 0.02). Univariate analysis showed three radiomic features independently correlated with death, and in multivariate analysis radiomic model showed good performance with AUC 0.87, sensitivity 100%, and specificity 66.7%. Three features achieved 0.77 ≤ ICC < 0.83 and one ICC = 0.92.
Conclusions
In patients affected by metastatic NETs eligible for Everolimus treatment, radiomics could be used as imaging biomarker able to predict PFS and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano Caruso
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza"-University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Polici
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza"-University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Rinzivillo
- Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
- ENETS Center of Excellence of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Zerunian
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza"-University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Nacci
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza"-University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Marasco
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza"-University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
- Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovica Magi
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza"-University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
- Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariarita Tarallo
- Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Gargiulo
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza"-University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Elsa Iannicelli
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza"-University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Annibale
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza"-University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
- Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza"-University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
- Radiology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy.
| | - Francesco Panzuto
- Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
- ENETS Center of Excellence of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, AOU Sant'Andrea, 00189, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|