1
|
Massanova M, Barone B, Caputo VF, Napolitano L, Ponsiglione A, Del Giudice F, Ferro M, Lucarelli G, Lasorsa F, Busetto GM, Robertson S, Trama F, Imbimbo C, Crocetto F. The detection rate for prostate cancer in systematic and targeted prostate biopsy in biopsy-naive patients, according to the localization of the lesion at the mpMRI: A single-center retrospective observational study. Prostate 2024. [PMID: 38924146 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate the detection rates of systematic, targeted and combined cores at biopsy according to tumor positions in biopsy-naïve patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of a single-center patient cohort (n = 501) that underwent transrectal prostate biopsy between January 2017 and December 2019 was performed. Multi-parametric MRI was executed as a prebiopsy investigation. Biopsy protocol included, for each patient, 12 systematic cores plus 3 to 5 targeted cores per lesion identified at the mpMRI. Pearson and McNemar chi-squared tests were used for statistical analysis to compare tumor location-related detection rates of systematic, targeted and combined (systematic + targeted) cores at biopsy. RESULTS Median age of patients was 70 years (IQR 62-72), with a median PSA of 8.5 ng/ml (IQR 5.7-15.6). Positive biopsies were obtained in 67.7% of cases. Overall, targeted cores obtained higher detection rates compared to systematic cores (54.3% vs. 43.1%, p < 0.0001). Differences in detection rates were, however, higher for tumors located at the apex (61.1% vs. 26.3%, p < 0.05) and anteriorly (44.4% vs. 19.3%, p < 0.05). Targeted cores similarly obtained higher detection rates in the posterior zone of the prostate gland for clinically significant prostate cancer. A poor agreement was reported between targeted and systematic cores for the apex and anterior zone of the prostate with, respectively κ = 0.028 and κ = -0.018. CONCLUSION A combined approach of targeted and systematic biopsy delivers the highest detection rate in prostate cancer (PCa). The location of the tumor could however greatly influence overall detection rates, indicating the possibility to omit (as for the base or posterior zone of the gland) or add (as for the apex or anterior zone of the gland) further targeted cores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Massanova
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
- Urology Department, Southend-On-Sea University Hospital, Southend-On-Sea, UK
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Urology Unit, AORN Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Francesco Caputo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Ponsiglione
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Sophie Robertson
- Urology Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Francesco Trama
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dell’Atti L, Slyusar V, Ronchi P, Manno S, Cambise C. Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Approach in Men Undergoing Kidney Transplant: A Retrospective Cohort Study at Three Referral Academic Centers. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:266. [PMID: 38337782 PMCID: PMC10855598 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14030266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, there are no studies evaluating the feasibility of a prostate biopsy approach in men undergoing a kidney transplant (KT). Owing to this evidence, we planned a retrospective population-based study to evaluate our experience of a transrectal prostate biopsy (TR-PB) approach and studied the impact on the complication rate and outcomes in patients undergoing KT with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS We collected data from KT patients who underwent PB with a transrectal approach. One week and two weeks after the PB, patients' information was collected regarding possible complications during the post-biopsy period. RESULTS A total of 121 patients were included in this study. Among them, Group 1 was composed of 59 patients undergoing TR-PB with an ultrasound (US) standard technique, and Group 2 consisted of 62 patients undergoing TR-PB with an MRI-US cognitive technique. We observed a 28.9% Clavien-Dindo grade ≤ 2 of early side effect rates (mostly rectal bleeding and other minor hematuria), with a very low rate of hospital re-admission for acute urinary retention (3.3%); only one man required hospitalization for rectal bleeding, and there were no major complications. CONCLUSIONS We can affirm that TR-PB can be a safe procedure with a low risk of severe complications when performed by skilled specialists with a standardized procedural pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucio Dell’Atti
- Department of Urology, University-Hospital of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Viktoria Slyusar
- Pain Therapy Center, Division of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University-Hospital of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Piero Ronchi
- Department of Urology, University-Hospital of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Stefano Manno
- Department of Urology, University-Hospital Renato Dulbecco, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| | - Chiara Cambise
- Department of Emergency, University-Hospital Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Roma, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alberti A, Nicoletti R, Polverino P, Rivetti A, Dibilio E, Resta GR, Makrides P, Caneschi C, Cifarelli A, D’Amico A, Moscardi L, Lo Re M, Peschiera F, Gallo ML, Pecoraro A, Sebastianelli A, Masieri L, Gacci M, Serni S, Campi R, Sessa F. Morbidity of Transrectal MRI-Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy at a Tertiary Referral Academic Centre: An Audit to Guide the Transition to the Transperineal Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5798. [PMID: 38136344 PMCID: PMC10742076 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) being still widespread globally, the EAU Guidelines strongly recommend the transperineal approach, due to the reported lower infectious risk. Our study aims to evaluate the impact of a standardized clinical pathway for TRPB on post-operative complications. We prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing mpMRI-targeted TRPB at our Academic Centre from January 2020 to December 2022. All patients followed a standardized, structured multistep pathway. Post-procedural complications were collected and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) Classification. Among 458 patients, post-procedural adverse events were reported by 203 (44.3%), of which 161 (35.2%) experienced CD grade 1 complications (hematuria [124, 27.1%], hematochezia [22, 4.8%], hematospermia [14, 3.1%], or a combination [20, 4.4%]), and 45 (9.0%) reported CD grade 2 complications (acute urinary retention or hematuria needing catheterization, as well as urinary tract infections, of which 2 cases required hospitalization). No major complications, including sepsis, were observed. At uni- and multivariable analysis, age > 70 years and BMI > 25 kg/ m2 for patients were identified as predictors of post-operative complications. The results of our study confirm that TRPB is a safe and cost-effective procedure with a low risk of severe adverse events in experienced hands and following a standardized pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Francesco Sessa
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.A.); (P.M.); (R.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Massanova M, Vere R, Robertson S, Crocetto F, Barone B, Dutto L, Ahmad I, Underwood M, Salmond J, Patel A, Celentano G, Bhatt JR. Clinical and prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings as predictors of general and clinically significant prostate cancer risk: A retrospective single-center study. Curr Urol 2023; 17:147-152. [PMID: 37448611 PMCID: PMC10337816 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the predictive values of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density (PSAD), digital rectal examination findings, and prostate volume, individually and in combination, for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in biopsy-naive patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 630 patients who underwent transrectal systematic prostate biopsy following prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. A standard 12-core biopsy procedure was performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the significant predictors of clinically significant cancer but not PCa. Results The median age, PSA level, and PSAD were 70 years, 8.6 ng/mL, and 0.18 ng/mL/mL, respectively. A total of 374 (59.4%) of 630 patients were biopsy-positive for PCa, and 241 (64.4%) of 374 were diagnosed with clinically significant PCa (csPCa). The PI-RADS v2 score and PSAD were independent predictors of PCa and csPCa. The PI-RADS v2 score of 5 regardless of the PSAD value, or PI-RADS v2 score of 4 plus a PSAD of <0.3 ng/mL/mL, was associated with the highest csPCa detection rate (36.1%-82.1%). Instead, the PI-RADS v2 score of <3 and PSAD of <0.3 ng/mL/mL yielded the lowest risk of csPCa. Conclusion The combination of the PI-RADS v2 score and PSAD could prove to be a helpful and reliable diagnostic tool before performing prostate biopsies. Patients with a PI-RADS v2 score of <3 and PSAD of <0.3 ng/mL/mL could potentially avoid a prostate biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Massanova
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rebecca Vere
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sophie Robertson
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Dutto
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Imran Ahmad
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mark Underwood
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jonathan Salmond
- Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Amit Patel
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
| | - Jaimin R. Bhatt
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bi S, Sun X, Sohaimi WFBW, Yusoff ALB. Study on the transferability of the knowledge-based VMAT model to predict IMRT plans in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:309. [PMID: 37653551 PMCID: PMC10469823 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01278-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of VMAT library-derived model transfer in the prediction of IMRT plans by dosimetry comparison among with three groups of IMRT plans: two groups of automatic IMRT plans generated by the knowledge-based the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) model and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) model and one group of manual IMRT plans. METHODS 52 prostate cancer patients who had completed radiotherapy were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups with 40 and 12 separately. Then both VMAT and IMRT plans were manually designed for all patients. The total plans in the group with 40 cases as training datasets were added to the knowledge-based planning (KBP) models for learning and finally obtained VMAT and IMRT training models. Another 12 cases were selected as the validation group to be used to generated auto IMRT plans by KBP VMAT and IMRT models. At last, the radiotherapy plans from three groups were obtained: the automated IMRT plan (V-IMRT) predicted by the VMAT model, the automated IMRT plan (I-IMRT) predicted by the IMRT model and the manual IMRT plan (M-IMRT) designed before. The dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risks (OARs) as well as the time parameters (monitor unit, MU) were statistically analyzed. RESULTS The dose limit of all plans in the training datasets met the clinical requirements. Compared with the training plans added to VMAT model, the dosimetry parameters have no statistical differences in PTV (P > 0.05); the dose of X% volume (Dx%) with D25% and D35% in rectal and the maximum dose (Dmax) in the right femoral head were lower (P = 0.04, P = 0.01, P = 0.00) while D50% in rectal was higher (< 0.05) in the IMRT model plans. In the 12 validation cases, both automated plans showed better dose distribution compared with the M-IMRT plan: the Dmax of PTV in the I-IMRT plans and the dose in volume of interesting (VOI) of bladder and bilateral femoral heads were lower with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Compared with the I-IMRT plans, dosimetric parameters in PTV and VOI of all OARs had no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05), but the Dmax in left femoral heard and D15% in the right femoral head were lower and have significant differences (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the low-dose regions, which was defined as all volumes outside of the PTV (RV) with the statistical parameters of mean dose (Dmean), the volume of covering more than 5 Gy dose (V5Gy), and also the time parameter (MU) required to perform the plan were considered. The results showed that Dmean in V-IMRT was smaller than that in the I-IMRT plan (P = 0.02) and there was no significant difference in V5Gy and MU (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Compared with the manual plan, the IMRT plans generated by the KBP models had a significant advantage in dose control of both OARs and PTV. Compared to the I-IMRT plans, the V-IMRT plans was not only without significant disadvantages, but it also achieved slightly better control of the low-dose region, which meet the clinical requirements and can used in the clinical treatment. This study demonstrates that it is feasible to transfer the KBP VMAT model in the prediction of IMRT plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suyan Bi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Xingru Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, Guangdong, China
| | | | - Ahmad Lutfi Bin Yusoff
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cereser L, Evangelista L, Giannarini G, Girometti R. Prostate MRI and PSMA-PET in the Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2697. [PMID: 37627956 PMCID: PMC10453091 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13162697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last years, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained a key role in the primary diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). While a negative MRI can avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies and the overdiagnosis of indolent cancers, a positive examination triggers biopsy samples targeted to suspicious imaging findings, thus increasing the diagnosis of csPCa with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of around 90%. The limitations of MRI, including suboptimal positive predictive values, are fueling debate on how to stratify biopsy decisions and management based on patient risk and how to correctly estimate it with clinical and/or imaging findings. In this setting, "next-generation imaging" imaging based on radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is expanding its indications both in the setting of primary staging (intermediate-to-high risk patients) and primary diagnosis (e.g., increasing the sensitivity of MRI or acting as a problem-solving tool for indeterminate MRI cases). This review summarizes the current main evidence on the role of prostate MRI and PSMA-PET as tools for the primary diagnosis of csPCa, and the different possible interaction pathways in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Cereser
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 20072 Milan, Italy;
- University Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), p.le S. Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Giannarini
- Urology Unit, University Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), p.le S. Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Rossano Girometti
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 20072 Milan, Italy;
- University Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), p.le S. Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100 Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chaddad A, Tan G, Liang X, Hassan L, Rathore S, Desrosiers C, Katib Y, Niazi T. Advancements in MRI-Based Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review and Future Prospects. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3839. [PMID: 37568655 PMCID: PMC10416937 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has become a common technique used in guiding biopsy and developing treatment plans for prostate lesions. While this technique is effective, non-invasive methods such as radiomics have gained popularity for extracting imaging features to develop predictive models for clinical tasks. The aim is to minimize invasive processes for improved management of prostate cancer (PCa). This study reviews recent research progress in MRI-based radiomics for PCa, including the radiomics pipeline and potential factors affecting personalized diagnosis. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with medical imaging is also discussed, in line with the development trend of radiogenomics and multi-omics. The survey highlights the need for more data from multiple institutions to avoid bias and generalize the predictive model. The AI-based radiomics model is considered a promising clinical tool with good prospects for application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Chaddad
- School of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin Universiy of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
- The Laboratory for Imagery, Vision and Artificial Intelligence, École de Technologie Supérieure (ETS), Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
| | - Guina Tan
- School of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin Universiy of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
| | - Xiaojuan Liang
- School of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin Universiy of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
| | - Lama Hassan
- School of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin Universiy of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
| | | | - Christian Desrosiers
- The Laboratory for Imagery, Vision and Artificial Intelligence, École de Technologie Supérieure (ETS), Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
| | - Yousef Katib
- Department of Radiology, Taibah University, Al Madinah 42361, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tamim Niazi
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barone B, Napolitano L, Calace FP, Del Biondo D, Napodano G, Grillo M, Reccia P, De Luca L, Prezioso D, Muto M, Crocetto F, Ferro M. Reliability of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with a Previous Negative Biopsy: Comparison with Biopsy-Naïve Patients in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111939. [PMID: 37296791 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance is an established imaging utilized in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as Gleason Score ≥ 4 + 3 or a maximum cancer core length 6 mm or longer, in patients with a previous negative biopsy. Methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective observational study at the University of Naples "Federico II", Italy. Overall, 389 patients who underwent systematic and target prostate biopsy between January 2019 and July 2020 were involved and were divided into two groups: Group A, which included biopsy-naïve patients; Group B, which included re-biopsy patients. All mpMRI images were obtained using three Tesla instruments and were interpreted according to PIRADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) version 2.0. Results: 327 patients were biopsy-naïve, while 62 belonged to the re-biopsy group. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, total PSA (prostate-specific antigen), and number of cores obtained at the biopsy. 2.2%, 8.8%, 36.1%, and 83.4% of, respectively, PIRADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 biopsy-naïve patients reported a clinically significant prostate cancer compared to 0%, 14.3%, 39%, and 66.6% of re-biopsy patients (p < 0.0001-p = 0.040). No difference was reported in terms of post-biopsy complications. Conclusions: mpMRI confirms its role as a reliable diagnostic tool prior to performing prostate biopsy in patients who underwent a previous negative biopsy, reporting a comparable detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biagio Barone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Paolo Calace
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Dario Del Biondo
- Unit of Urology, Hospital "Ospedale del Mare", ASL Napoli 1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy
| | - Giorgio Napodano
- Unit of Urology, Hospital "Ospedale del Mare", ASL Napoli 1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Grillo
- Unit of Urology, Hospital "Ospedale del Mare", ASL Napoli 1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy
- Department of Medical-Surgical Biotechnologies and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Reccia
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi De Luca
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Domenico Prezioso
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Matteo Muto
- Department of Onco-Hematological Diseases, AORN "San Giuseppe Moscati", 83100 Avellino, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Diamand R, Peltier A, Roche JB, Lievore E, Lacetera V, Chiacchio G, Beatrici V, Mastroianni R, Simone G, Windisch O, Benamran D, Fourcade A, Nguyen TA, Fournier G, Fiard G, Ploussard G, Roumeguère T, Albisinni S. Optimizing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and prostate cancer grading accuracy. World J Urol 2023; 41:77-84. [PMID: 36509932 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04244-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the most efficient biopsy method to improve International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group accuracy with final pathology of the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen in the era of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-driven pathway. METHODS A total of 753 patients diagnosed by transrectal MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies (namely "standard method"), treated by RP, between 2016 and 2021 were evaluated. Biopsy methods included MRI-targeted biopsy, side-specific systematic biopsies relative to index MRI lesion and combination of both. Number of MRI-targeted biopsy cores and positive cores needed per index MRI lesion were assessed. Multivariable analysis was performed to analyze predictive factors of upgrading using MRI targeted and ipsilateral systematic biopsies method. RESULTS Overall, ISUP grade group accuracy varied among biopsy methods with upgrading rate of 35%, 49%, 27%, and 24% for MRI targeted, systematic, MRI targeted and ipsilateral systematic biopsies and standard methods, respectively (p < 0.001). A minimum of two positive MRI-targeted biopsies cores per index MRI lesion were required when testing MRI targeted and ipsilateral systematic biopsies method to reach equivalent accuracy compared to standard method. Omitting contralateral systematic biopsies spared an average of 5.9 cores per patient. At multivariable analysis, only the number of positive MRI-targeted biopsy cores per index MRI lesion was predictive of upgrading. CONCLUSION MRI targeted and ipsilateral systematic biopsies allowed an accurate definition of ISUP grade group and appears to be an interesting alternative when compared with standard method, reducing total number of biopsy cores needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Diamand
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Alexandre Peltier
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Elena Lievore
- Department of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France.,Department of Urology, IRCCS IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Mila, Italy
| | - Vito Lacetera
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Chiacchio
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Valerio Beatrici
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Olivier Windisch
- Department of Urology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Benamran
- Department of Urology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexandre Fourcade
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Cavale Blanche, CHRU Brest, Brest, France
| | - Truong An Nguyen
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Cavale Blanche, CHRU Brest, Brest, France
| | - Georges Fournier
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Cavale Blanche, CHRU Brest, Brest, France
| | - Gaelle Fiard
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Thierry Roumeguère
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Noh TI, Shim JS, Kang SH, Cheon J, Kang SG. Diagnostic performance of transperineal prostate targeted biopsy alone according to the PI-RADS score based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1142022. [PMID: 37035173 PMCID: PMC10080665 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1142022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of transperineal targeted biopsy (TB) or systematic biopsy (SB) alone based on combined TB+SB and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen for detecting prostate cancer (PCa) according to the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score. Materials and methods This study included 1077 men who underwent transperineal bi-parametric (bp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-ultrasound (US) fusion TB+SB (bpMRI-US FTSB) between April 2019 and March 2022. To compare the performance of each modality (TB, SB, and combined TB+SB) with the RP specimen (as the standard) for detecting PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. Results PCa was detected in 581 of 1077 men (53.9%) using bpMRI-US FTSB. CsPCa was detected in 383 of 1077 men (35.6%), 17 of 285 (6.0%) with PI-RADS 0 to 2, 35 of 277 (12.6%) with PI-RADS 3, 134 of 274 (48.9%) with PI-RADS 4, and 197 of 241 (81.7%) with PI-RADS 5, respectively. The additional diagnostic value of TB vs. SB compared to combined TB+SB for diagnosing csPCa were 4.3% vs. 3.2% (p=0.844), 20.4% vs 5.1% (p<0.001), and 20.3% vs. 0.7% (p<0.001) with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5, respectively. TB alone showed no significant difference in diagnostic performance for csPCa with combined TB+SB based on RP specimens in patients with PI-RADS 5 (p=0.732). Conclusion A need for addition of SB to TB in patients with PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions, however, TB alone may be performed without affecting the management of patients with PI-RADS 5.
Collapse
|
11
|
Boccellino M, Ambrosio P, Ballini A, De Vito D, Scacco S, Cantore S, Feola A, Di Donato M, Quagliuolo L, Sciarra A, Galasso G, Crocetto F, Imbimbo C, Boffo S, Di Zazzo E, Di Domenico M. The Role of Curcumin in Prostate Cancer Cells and Derived Spheroids. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143348. [PMID: 35884410 PMCID: PMC9320241 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
A major challenge in the clinical management of prostate cancer (PC) is to inhibit tumor growth and prevent metastatic spreading. In recent years, considerable efforts have been made to discover new compounds useful for PC therapy, and promising advances in this field were reached. Drugs currently used in PC therapy frequently induce resistance and PC progresses toward metastatic castration-resistant forms (mCRPC), making it virtually incurable. Curcumin, a commercially available nutritional supplement, represents an attractive therapeutic agent for mCRPC patients. In the present study, we compared the effects of chemotherapeutic drugs such as docetaxel, paclitaxel, and cisplatin, to curcumin, on two PC cell lines displaying a different metastatic potential: DU145 (moderate metastatic potential) and PC-3 (high metastatic potential). Our results revealed a dose-dependent reduction of DU145 and PC-3 cell viability upon treatment with curcumin similar to chemotherapeutic agents (paclitaxel, cisplatin, and docetaxel). Furthermore, we explored the EGFR-mediated signaling effects on ERK activation in DU145 and PC-3 cells. Our results showed that DU145 and PC-3 cells overexpress EGFR, and the treatment with chemotherapeutic agents or curcumin reduced EGFR expression levels and ERK activation. Finally, chemotherapeutic agents and curcumin reduced the size of DU145 and PC-3 spheroids and have the potential to induce apoptosis and also in Matrigel. In conclusion, despite different studies being carried out to identify the potential synergistic curcumin combinations with chemopreventive/therapeutic efficacy for inhibiting PC growth, the results show the ability of curcumin used alone, or in combinatorial approaches, to impair the size and the viability of PC-derived spheroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariarosaria Boccellino
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.B.); (P.A.); (A.F.); (M.D.D.); (L.Q.); (G.G.); (E.D.Z.); (M.D.D.)
| | - Pasqualina Ambrosio
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.B.); (P.A.); (A.F.); (M.D.D.); (L.Q.); (G.G.); (E.D.Z.); (M.D.D.)
| | - Andrea Ballini
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.B.); (P.A.); (A.F.); (M.D.D.); (L.Q.); (G.G.); (E.D.Z.); (M.D.D.)
- Correspondence: (A.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Danila De Vito
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (D.D.V.); (S.S.)
| | - Salvatore Scacco
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (D.D.V.); (S.S.)
| | - Stefania Cantore
- Independent Researcher, 70129 Bari, Italy
- Correspondence: (A.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Antonia Feola
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.B.); (P.A.); (A.F.); (M.D.D.); (L.Q.); (G.G.); (E.D.Z.); (M.D.D.)
| | - Marzia Di Donato
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.B.); (P.A.); (A.F.); (M.D.D.); (L.Q.); (G.G.); (E.D.Z.); (M.D.D.)
| | - Lucio Quagliuolo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.B.); (P.A.); (A.F.); (M.D.D.); (L.Q.); (G.G.); (E.D.Z.); (M.D.D.)
| | - Antonella Sciarra
- Department of Biology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80126 Naples, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Galasso
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.B.); (P.A.); (A.F.); (M.D.D.); (L.Q.); (G.G.); (E.D.Z.); (M.D.D.)
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (C.I.)
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (C.I.)
| | - Silvia Boffo
- Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122-6078, USA;
| | - Erika Di Zazzo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.B.); (P.A.); (A.F.); (M.D.D.); (L.Q.); (G.G.); (E.D.Z.); (M.D.D.)
| | - Marina Di Domenico
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.B.); (P.A.); (A.F.); (M.D.D.); (L.Q.); (G.G.); (E.D.Z.); (M.D.D.)
- Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122-6078, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Crocetto F, Russo G, Di Zazzo E, Pisapia P, Mirto BF, Palmieri A, Pepe F, Bellevicine C, Russo A, La Civita E, Terracciano D, Malapelle U, Troncone G, Barone B. Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Management—Current Challenges and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133272. [PMID: 35805043 PMCID: PMC9265840 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Prostate cancer (PCa) is a widespread malignancy, representing the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. In the last years, liquid biopsy has emerged as an attractive and promising strategy complementary to invasive tissue biopsy to guide PCa diagnosis, follow-up and treatment response. Liquid biopsy is employed to assess several body fluids biomarkers, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and RNA (ctRNA). This review dissects recent advancements and future perspectives of liquid biopsy, highlighting its strength and weaknesses in PCa management. Abstract Although appreciable attempts in screening and diagnostic approaches have been achieved, prostate cancer (PCa) remains a widespread malignancy, representing the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Drugs currently used in PCa therapy initially show a potent anti-tumor effect, but frequently induce resistance and PCa progresses toward metastatic castration-resistant forms (mCRPC), virtually incurable. Liquid biopsy has emerged as an attractive and promising strategy complementary to invasive tissue biopsy to guide PCa diagnosis and treatment. Liquid biopsy shows the ability to represent the tumor microenvironment, allow comprehensive information and follow-up the progression of the tumor, enabling the development of different treatment strategies as well as permitting the monitoring of therapy response. Liquid biopsy, indeed, is endowed with a significant potential to modify PCa management. Several blood biomarkers could be analyzed for diagnostic, prognostic and predictive purposes, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and RNA (ctRNA). In addition, several other body fluids may be adopted (i.e., urine, sperm, etc.) beyond blood. This review dissects recent advancements and future perspectives of liquid biopsies, highlighting their strength and weaknesses in PCa management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (B.F.M.); (A.P.); (B.B.)
| | - Gianluca Russo
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.R.); (P.P.); (F.P.); (C.B.); (U.M.); (G.T.)
| | - Erika Di Zazzo
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Pasquale Pisapia
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.R.); (P.P.); (F.P.); (C.B.); (U.M.); (G.T.)
| | - Benito Fabio Mirto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (B.F.M.); (A.P.); (B.B.)
| | - Alessandro Palmieri
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (B.F.M.); (A.P.); (B.B.)
| | - Francesco Pepe
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.R.); (P.P.); (F.P.); (C.B.); (U.M.); (G.T.)
| | - Claudio Bellevicine
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.R.); (P.P.); (F.P.); (C.B.); (U.M.); (G.T.)
| | | | - Evelina La Civita
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (E.L.C.); (D.T.)
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (E.L.C.); (D.T.)
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.R.); (P.P.); (F.P.); (C.B.); (U.M.); (G.T.)
| | - Giancarlo Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.R.); (P.P.); (F.P.); (C.B.); (U.M.); (G.T.)
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (B.F.M.); (A.P.); (B.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xie J, Jin C, Liu M, Sun K, Jin Z, Ding Z, Gong X. MRI/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Targeted Biopsy and Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsy for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:880336. [PMID: 35677152 PMCID: PMC9169152 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.880336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose For men suspected of having prostate cancer (PCa), the transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy (SB) was performed. MRI/TRUS fusion guided-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) could enhance PCa detection, allowing sampling of sites at higher risk which were not obvious with TRUS alone. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the detection rates of prostate cancer by MRI-TB or MRI-TB plus SB versus SB, mainly for diagnosis of high-risk PCa. Methods A literature Search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. We searched from inception of the databases up to January 2021. Results A total of 5831 patients from 26 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Compared to traditional TRUS-guided biopsy, MRI-TB had a significantly higher detection rate of clinically significant PCa (RR=1.27; 95%CI 1.15-1.40; p<0.001) and high-risk PCa (RR=1.41; 95% CI 1.22-1.64; p<0.001), while the detection rate of clinically insignificant PCa was lower (RR=0.65; 95%CI 0.55-0.77; p<0.001). MRI-TB and SB did not significantly differ in the detection of overall prostate cancer (RR=1.04; 95%CI 0.95-1.12; p=0.41). Compared with SB alone, we found that MRI-TB plus SB diagnosed more cases of overall, clinically significant and high-risk PCa (p<0.001). Conclusion Compared with systematic protocols, MRI-TB detects more clinically significant and high-risk PCa cases, and fewer clinically insignificant PCa cases. MRI-TB combined with SB enhances PCa detection in contrast with either alone but did not reduce the diagnosis rate of clinically insignificant PCa. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, CRD42021218475.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianfeng Xie
- Department of Ultrasound, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Chunchun Jin
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Mengmeng Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Second Clinical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasound Engineering Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Kun Sun
- Department of Ultrasound, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhanqiang Jin
- Department of Ultrasound, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhimin Ding
- Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Second Clinical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasound Engineering Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xuehao Gong
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Agnello L, Vidali M, Giglio RV, Gambino CM, Ciaccio AM, Lo Sasso B, Ciaccio M. Prostate health index (PHI) as a reliable biomarker for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022; 60:1261-1277. [PMID: 35567430 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prostate cancer (PCa) represents the second most common solid cancer in men worldwide. In the last decades, the prostate health index (PHI) emerged as a reliable biomarker for detecting PCa and differentiating between non-aggressive and aggressive forms. However, before introducing it in clinical practice, more evidence is required. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for assessing the diagnostic performance of PHI for PCa and for detecting clinically significant PCa (csPCa). METHODS Relevant publications were identified by a systematic literature search on PubMed and Web of Science from inception to January 11, 2022. RESULTS Sixty studies, including 14,255 individuals, met the inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PHI for PCa detection was 0.791 (95%CI 0.739-0.834) and 0.625 (95%CI 0.560-0.686), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PHI for csPCa detection was 0.874 (95%CI 0.803-0.923) and 0.569 (95%CI 0.458-0.674), respectively. Additionally, the diagnostic odds ratio was 6.302 and 9.206, respectively, for PCa and csPCa detection, suggesting moderate to good effectiveness of PHI as a diagnostic test. CONCLUSIONS PHI has a high accuracy for detecting PCa and discriminating between aggressive and non-aggressive PCa. Thus, it could be useful as a biomarker in predicting patients harbouring more aggressive cancer and guiding biopsy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Agnello
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| | - Matteo Vidali
- Foundation IRCCS Ca' Grande Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosaria Vincenza Giglio
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, AOUP "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| | - Caterina Maria Gambino
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, AOUP "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Bruna Lo Sasso
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, AOUP "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| | - Marcello Ciaccio
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, AOUP "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dinneen E, Allen C, Strange T, Heffernan-Ho D, Banjeglav J, Lindsay J, Mulligan JP, Briggs T, Nathan S, Sridhar A, Grierson J, Haider A, Panayi C, Patel D, Freeman A, Aning J, Persad R, Ahmad I, Dutto L, Oakley N, Ambrosi A, Parry T, Kasivisvanathan V, Giganti F, Shaw G, Punwani S. Negative mpMRI Rules Out Extra-Prostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:1057. [PMID: 35626214 PMCID: PMC9139507 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The accuracy of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) in the pre-operative staging of prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of mpMRI to accurately predict PCa extra-prostatic extension (EPE) on a side-specific basis using a risk-stratified 5-point Likert scale. This study also aimed to assess the influence of mpMRI scan quality on diagnostic accuracy. Patients and Methods: We included 124 men who underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP) as part of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study at our centre. Three radiologists retrospectively reviewed mpMRI blinded to RP pathology and assigned a Likert score (1-5) for EPE on each side of the prostate. Each scan was also ascribed a Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score for assessing the quality of the mpMRI scan, where 1 represents the poorest and 5 represents the best diagnostic quality. Outcome measurements and statistical analyses: Diagnostic performance is presented for the binary classification of EPE, including 95% confidence intervals and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 231 lobes from 121 men (mean age 56.9 years) were evaluated. Of these, 39 men (32.2%), or 43 lobes (18.6%), had EPE. A Likert score ≥3 had a sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), NPV, and PPV of 90.4%, 52.3%, 96%, and 29.9%, respectively, and the AUC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.86). The AUC was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.88), 0.78 (0.72-0.84), and 0.92 (0.88-0.96) for biparametric scans, PI-QUAL 1-3, and PI-QUAL 4-5 scans, respectively. Conclusions: MRI can be used effectively by genitourinary radiologists to rule out EPE and help inform surgical planning for men undergoing RARP. EPE prediction was more reliable when the MRI scan was (a) multi-parametric and (b) of a higher image quality according to the PI-QUAL scoring system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoin Dinneen
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.G.); (V.K.); (F.G.); (G.S.)
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (C.A.); (T.S.); (D.H.-H.); (S.P.)
| | - Tom Strange
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (C.A.); (T.S.); (D.H.-H.); (S.P.)
| | - Daniel Heffernan-Ho
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (C.A.); (T.S.); (D.H.-H.); (S.P.)
| | - Jelena Banjeglav
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Jamie Lindsay
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - John-Patrick Mulligan
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Tim Briggs
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Senthil Nathan
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Jack Grierson
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.G.); (V.K.); (F.G.); (G.S.)
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.H.); (C.P.); (D.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Aiman Haider
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.H.); (C.P.); (D.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Christos Panayi
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.H.); (C.P.); (D.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Dominic Patel
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.H.); (C.P.); (D.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.H.); (C.P.); (D.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Jonathan Aning
- North Bristol Hospitals Trust, Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Lane, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK; (J.A.); (R.P.)
| | - Raj Persad
- North Bristol Hospitals Trust, Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Lane, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK; (J.A.); (R.P.)
| | - Imran Ahmad
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK; (I.A.); (L.D.)
| | - Lorenzo Dutto
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK; (I.A.); (L.D.)
| | - Neil Oakley
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK;
| | - Alessandro Ambrosi
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milano, Italy;
| | - Tom Parry
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Charles Bell House, 2nd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK;
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.G.); (V.K.); (F.G.); (G.S.)
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.G.); (V.K.); (F.G.); (G.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (C.A.); (T.S.); (D.H.-H.); (S.P.)
| | - Greg Shaw
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.G.); (V.K.); (F.G.); (G.S.)
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (C.A.); (T.S.); (D.H.-H.); (S.P.)
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Charles Bell House, 2nd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grades the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071828. [PMID: 35406600 PMCID: PMC8997549 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
We sought to find further evidence showing the increase in PCa aggressiveness as PI-RADS score increases from four surrogates of PCa aggressiveness: i. prostate biopsy GG (≤3 vs. >3), ii. type of pathology in surgical specimens (favourable vs. unfavourable), iii. clinical stage (localised vs. advanced), and risk of recurrence of localised PCa after primary treatment (low-intermediate vs. high). A group of 692 PCa patients were diagnosed after 3-T multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and guided and/or systematic biopsies, showing csPCa (GG ≥ 2) in 547 patients (79%) and insignificant PCa (iPCa) in 145 (21%). The csPCa rate increased from 32.4% in PI-RADS < 3 to 95.5% in PI-RADS 5 (p < 0.001). GG ≥ 3 was observed in 7.6% of PCa with PI-RADS < 3 and 32.6% in those with PI-RADS > 3 (p < 0.001). Unfavourable pathology was observed in 38.9% of PCa with PI-RAD < 3 and 68.3% in those with PI-RADS > 3 (p = 0.030). Advanced disease was not observed in PCa with PI-RADS ≤ 3, while it existed in 12.7% of those with PI-RADS > 3 (p < 0.001). High-risk recurrence localised PCa was observed in 9.5% of PCa with PI-RADS < 3 and 35% in those with PI-RADS > 3 (p = 0.001). The PI-RADS score was an independent predictor of all surrogates of PCa aggressiveness as PSA density. We confirmed that mpMRI grades PCa aggressiveness.
Collapse
|
17
|
A combinatorial neural network analysis reveals a synergistic behaviour of multiparametric magnetic resonance and prostate health index in the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:e406-e410. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
18
|
Morote J, Borque-Fernando A, Triquell M, Celma A, Regis L, Escobar M, Mast R, de Torres IM, Semidey ME, Abascal JM, Sola C, Servian P, Salvador D, Santamaría A, Planas J, Esteban LM, Trilla E. The Barcelona Predictive Model of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061589. [PMID: 35326740 PMCID: PMC8946272 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
A new and externally validated MRI-PM for csPCa was developed in the metropolitan area of Barcelona, and a web-RC designed with the new option of selecting the csPCa probability threshold. The development cohort comprised 1486 men scheduled to undergo a 3-tesla multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and guided and/or systematic biopsies in one academic institution of Barcelona. The external validation cohort comprised 946 men in whom the same diagnostic approach was carried out as in the development cohort, in two other academic institutions of the same metropolitan area. CsPCa was detected in 36.9% of men in the development cohort and 40.8% in the external validation cohort (p = 0.054). The area under the curve of mpMRI increased from 0.842 to 0.897 in the developed MRI-PM (p < 0.001), and from 0.743 to 0.858 in the external validation cohort (p < 0.001). A selected 15% threshold avoided 40.1% of prostate biopsies and missed 5.4% of the 36.9% csPCa detected in the development cohort. In men with PI-RADS <3, 4.3% would be biopsied and 32.3% of all existing 4.2% of csPCa would be detected. In men with PI-RADS 3, 62% of prostate biopsies would be avoided and 28% of all existing 12.4% of csPCa would be undetected. In men with PI-RADS 4, 4% of prostate biopsies would be avoided and 0.6% of all existing 43.1% of csPCa would be undetected. In men with PI-RADS 5, 0.6% of prostate biopsies would be avoided and none of the existing 42.0% of csPCa would be undetected. The Barcelona MRI-PM presented good performance on the overall population; however, its clinical usefulness varied regarding the PI-RADS category. The selection of csPCa probability thresholds in the designed RC may facilitate external validation and outperformance of MRI-PMs in specific PI-RADS categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Morote
- Department of Urology, Vall d’Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (M.T.); (A.C.); (L.R.); (J.P.); (E.T.)
- Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-9327-46009
| | - Angel Borque-Fernando
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, IIS-Aragon, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - Marina Triquell
- Department of Urology, Vall d’Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (M.T.); (A.C.); (L.R.); (J.P.); (E.T.)
- Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Celma
- Department of Urology, Vall d’Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (M.T.); (A.C.); (L.R.); (J.P.); (E.T.)
- Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lucas Regis
- Department of Urology, Vall d’Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (M.T.); (A.C.); (L.R.); (J.P.); (E.T.)
- Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manel Escobar
- Department of Radiology, Vall d´Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (M.E.); (R.M.)
| | - Richard Mast
- Department of Radiology, Vall d´Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (M.E.); (R.M.)
| | - Inés M. de Torres
- Department of Pathology, Vall d´Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (I.M.d.T.); (M.E.S.)
- Department of Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - María E. Semidey
- Department of Pathology, Vall d´Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (I.M.d.T.); (M.E.S.)
- Department of Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - José M. Abascal
- Department of Urology, Parc de Salut Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (J.M.A.); (C.S.)
| | - Carles Sola
- Department of Urology, Parc de Salut Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (J.M.A.); (C.S.)
| | - Pol Servian
- Department of Urology, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain; (P.S.); (D.S.)
| | - Daniel Salvador
- Department of Urology, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain; (P.S.); (D.S.)
| | - Anna Santamaría
- Urology Research Group, Vall d´ Hebron Research Institute, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Jacques Planas
- Department of Urology, Vall d’Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (M.T.); (A.C.); (L.R.); (J.P.); (E.T.)
| | - Luis M. Esteban
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Escuela Universitaria Politécnica La Almunia, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50100 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - Enrique Trilla
- Department of Urology, Vall d’Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (M.T.); (A.C.); (L.R.); (J.P.); (E.T.)
- Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Semi-Automatic MRI Feature Assessment in Small- and Medium-Volume Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia after Prostatic Artery Embolization. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12030585. [PMID: 35328138 PMCID: PMC8946889 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: To assess the treatment response of benign prostatic syndrome (BPS) following prostatic artery embolization (PAE) using a semi-automatic software analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and clinical indexes. (2) Methods: Prospective, monocenter study of MRI and clinical data of n = 27 patients with symptomatic BPS before and (1, 6, 12 months) after PAE. MRI analysis was performed using a dedicated semi-automatic software for segmentation of the central and the total gland (CG, TG), respectively; signal intensities (SIs) of T1-weighted (T1w), T2-weighted (T2w), and diffusion-weighted images (DWI), as well as intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) and prostatic volumes (CGV, TGV), were evaluated at each time point. The semi-automatic assessed TGV was compared to conventional TGV by an ellipse formula. International prostate symptom score (IPSS) and international consultation on incontinence questionnaire−urinary incontinence short form (ICIQ-UI SF) questionnaires were used as clinical indexes. Statistical testing in the form of ANOVA, pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction, and multiple linear correlations, were conducted using SPSS. (3) Results: TGV was significantly reduced one, six, and 12 months after PAE as assessed by the semi-automatic approach and conventional ellipse formula (p = 0.005; p = 0.025). CGV significantly decreased after one month (p = 0.038), but showed no significant differences six and 12 months after PAE (p = 0.191; p = 0.283). IPP at baseline was demonstrated by 25/27 patients (92.6%) with a significant decrease one, six, and 12 months after treatment (p = 0.028; p = 0.010; p = 0.008). Significant improvement in IPSS and ICIQ-UI SF (p = 0.002; p = 0.016) after one month correlated moderately with TGV reduction (p = 0.031; p = 0.05, correlation coefficients 0.52; 0.69). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of CG significantly decreased one month after embolization (p < 0.001), while there were no significant differences in T1w and T2w SIs before and after treatment at each time point. (4) Conclusions: The semi-automatic approach is appropriate for the assessment of volumetric and morphological changes in prostate MRI following PAE, able to identify significantly different ADC values post-treatment without the need for manual identification of infarct areas. Semi-automatic measured TGV reduction is significant and comparable to the TGV calculated by the conventional ellipse formula, confirming the clinical response after PAE.
Collapse
|
20
|
Fan X, Xie N, Chen J, Li T, Cao R, Yu H, He M, Wang Z, Wang Y, Liu H, Wang H, Yin X. Multiparametric MRI and Machine Learning Based Radiomic Models for Preoperative Prediction of Multiple Biological Characteristics in Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:839621. [PMID: 35198452 PMCID: PMC8859464 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.839621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aims to develop and evaluate multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI)-based radiomic models as a noninvasive diagnostic method to predict several biological characteristics of prostate cancer. Methods A total of 252 patients were retrospectively included who underwent radical prostatectomy and MP-MRI examinations. The prediction characteristics of this study were as follows: Ki67, S100, extracapsular extension (ECE), perineural invasion (PNI), and surgical margin (SM). Patients were divided into training cohorts and validation cohorts in the ratio of 4:1 for each group. After lesion segmentation manually, radiomic features were extracted from MP-MRI images and some clinical factors were also included. Max relevance min redundancy (mRMR) and recursive feature elimination (RFE) based on random forest (RF) were adopted to select features. Six classifiers were included (SVM, KNN, RF, decision tree, logistic regression, XGBOOST) to find the best diagnostic performance among them. The diagnostic efficiency of the construction models was evaluated by ROC curves and quantified by AUC. Results RF performed best among the six classifiers for the four groups according to AUC values (Ki67 = 0.87, S100 = 0.80, ECE = 0.85, PNI = 0.82). The performance of SVM was relatively the best for SM (AUC = 0.77). The number and importance of DCE features ranked first in the models of each group. The combined models of MP-MRI and clinical characteristics showed no significant difference compared with MP-MRI models according to Delong’s tests. Conclusions Radiomics models based on MP-MRI have the potential to predict biological characteristics and are expected to be a noninvasive method to evaluate the risk stratification of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuhui Fan
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ni Xie
- Institution for Clinical Research, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingwen Chen
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tiewen Li
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Cao
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongwei Yu
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Meijuan He
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zilin Wang
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yihui Wang
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Research and Development, Yizhun Medical AI Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Han Wang
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Institution for Clinical Research, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Radiology, Jiading Branch of Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaorui Yin
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tao T, Wang C, Liu W, Yuan L, Ge Q, Zhang L, He B, Wang L, Wang L, Xiang C, Wang H, Chen S, Xiao J. Construction and Validation of a Clinical Predictive Nomogram for Improving the Cancer Detection of Prostate Naive Biopsy Based on Chinese Multicenter Clinical Data. Front Oncol 2022; 11:811866. [PMID: 35127526 PMCID: PMC8814531 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.811866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Prostate biopsy is a common approach for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with suspicious PCa. In order to increase the detection rate of prostate naive biopsy, we constructed two effective nomograms for predicting the diagnosis of PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) prior to biopsy. Materials and Methods The data of 1,428 patients who underwent prostate biopsy in three Chinese medical centers from January 2018 to June 2021 were used to conduct this retrospective study. The KD cohort, which consisted of 701 patients, was used for model construction and internal validation; the DF cohort, which consisted of 385 patients, and the ZD cohort, which consisted of 342 patients, were used for external validation. Independent predictors were selected by univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis and adopted for establishing the predictive nomogram. The apparent performance of the model was evaluated via internal validation and geographically external validation. For assessing the clinical utility of our model, decision curve analysis was also performed. Results The results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) (P<0.001, OR:2.102, 95%CI:1.687-2.620) and prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) grade (P<0.001, OR:4.528, 95%CI:2.752-7.453) were independent predictors of PCa before biopsy. Therefore, a nomogram composed of PSAD and PI-RADS grade was constructed. Internal validation in the developed cohort showed that the nomogram had good discrimination (AUC=0.804), and the calibration curve indicated that the predicted incidence was consistent with the observed incidence of PCa; the brier score was 0.172. External validation was performed in the DF and ZD cohorts. The AUC values were 0.884 and 0.882, in the DF and ZD cohorts, respectively. Calibration curves elucidated greatly predicted the accuracy of PCa in the two validation cohorts; the brier scores were 0.129 in the DF cohort and 0.131 in the ZD cohort. Decision curve analysis showed that our model can add net benefits for patients. A separated predicted model for csPCa was also established and validated. The apparent performance of our nomogram for PCa was also assessed in three different PSA groups, and the results were as good as we expected. Conclusions In this study, we put forward two simple and convenient clinical predictive models comprised of PSAD and PI-RADS grade with excellent reproducibility and generalizability. They provide a novel calculator for the prediction of the diagnosis of an individual patient with suspicious PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Tao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Changming Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Weiyong Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Lei Yuan
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Qingyu Ge
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Lang Zhang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Biming He
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Caiping Xiang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Haifeng Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuqiu Chen
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Xiao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Salciccia S, Rosati D, Viscuso P, Canale V, Scarrone E, Frisenda M, Catuzzi R, Moriconi M, Asero V, Signore S, De Dominicis M, Emiliozzi P, Carbone A, Pastore AL, Fuschi A, Di Pierro GB, Gentilucci A, Cattarino S, Mariotti G, Busetto GM, Ferro M, De Berardinis E, Ricciuti GP, Panebianco V, Magliocca FM, Del Giudice F, Maggi M, Sciarra A. Influence of operative time and blood loss on surgical margins and functional outcomes for laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective analysis. Cent European J Urol 2022; 74:503-515. [PMID: 35083069 PMCID: PMC8771133 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this article was to analyze whether operative time and blood loss during radical prostatectomy (RP) can significantly influence surgical margins (SM) status and post-operative functional outcomes. Material and methods We prospectively analyzed prostate cancer (PC) patients undergoing RP, using robot-assisted (RARP) or laparoscopic (LRP) procedures. Blood loss was defined using the variation in hemoglobin (Hb, g/dl) values from the day before surgery and no later than 4 hours after surgery. Results From a whole population of 413 cases considered for RP, 67% underwent LRP and 33.0% RARP. Positive SM (SM+) were found in 33.9% of cases. Mean surgical operative time was 172.3 ±76 min (range 49–485), whereas blood loss was 2.3 ±1.2 g/dl (range 0.3–7.6). Operative time and blood loss at RP were not significantly correlated (r = -0.028275; p = 0.684). SM+ rates significantly (p = 0.002) varied by operative time; a higher SM+ rate was found in cases with an operative time <120 min (41.2%) and >240 min (53.4%). The risk of SM+ significantly increased 1.70 and 1.94 times in cases with an operative time <120 min and >240 min, respectively, independently to the surgical approach. The rate of erectile disfunction (ED) varied from 22.4% to 60.3% between <120 min and >240 min procedures (p = 0.001). According to blood loss, SM+ rates slightly but significantly (p = 0.032) varied; a higher rate of SM+ was found in cases with a Hb variation between 2–4 g/dl (35.9%). Conclusions Independently to the surgical approach, operative time, more than blood loss at RP, represents a significant variable able to influence SM status and post-operative ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Salciccia
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Davide Rosati
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Viscuso
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittorio Canale
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Emiliano Scarrone
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Frisenda
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Catuzzi
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Moriconi
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Asero
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Signore
- Department of Urology, S. Eugenio Hospital, ASL Rome 2, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Emiliozzi
- Department of Urology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Carbone
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza Rome University, Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Antonio Luigi Pastore
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza Rome University, Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Andrea Fuschi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza Rome University, Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Giovanni Battista Di Pierro
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Gianna Mariotti
- Department of Urology, University Sapienza Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ettore De Berardinis
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Ricciuti
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomopathological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Massimo Magliocca
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomopathological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ferro M, de Cobelli O, Musi G, del Giudice F, Carrieri G, Busetto GM, Falagario UG, Sciarra A, Maggi M, Crocetto F, Barone B, Caputo VF, Marchioni M, Lucarelli G, Imbimbo C, Mistretta FA, Luzzago S, Vartolomei MD, Cormio L, Autorino R, Tătaru OS. Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221109020. [PMID: 35814914 PMCID: PMC9260602 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221109020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common worldwide diagnosed malignancy in male population. The diagnosis, the identification of aggressive disease, and the post-treatment follow-up needs a more comprehensive and holistic approach. Radiomics is the extraction and interpretation of images phenotypes in a quantitative manner. Radiomics may give an advantage through advancements in imaging modalities and through the potential power of artificial intelligence techniques by translating those features into clinical outcome prediction. This article gives an overview on the current evidence of methodology and reviews the available literature on radiomics in PCa patients, highlighting its potential for personalized treatment and future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy, via Ripamonti 435 Milano, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco del Giudice
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Francesco Caputo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d’Annunzio, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy; Urology Unit, ‘SS. Annunziata’ Hospital, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Urology, ASL Abruzzo 2, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Alessandro Mistretta
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mihai Dorin Vartolomei
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Târgu Mures, Târgu Mures, Romania
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Luigi Cormio
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
- Urology Unit, Bonomo Teaching Hospital, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Octavian Sabin Tătaru
- Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies, I.O.S.U.D., George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Târgu Mures, Târgu Mures, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Significant Inter- and Intralaboratory Variation in Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Study of 35,258 Patients in The Netherlands. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215378. [PMID: 34771542 PMCID: PMC8582481 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Gleason grading of prostate cancer is essential for treatment strategies and patient prognosis. Previous studies showed grading variation between pathologists when grading prostate cancer. Our study analyzed the presence and extent of grading variation between and within pathology laboratories in The Netherlands. In our nationwide retrospective study, we analyzed prostate needle biopsy reports of 35,258 patients in The Netherlands graded by 40 pathology laboratories. We found a considerable variation between and within pathology laboratories, as over half of the laboratories graded significantly different from the national mean. This likely affects treatment strategy and prognosis assessment of prostate cancer patients. Abstract Purpose: Our aim was to analyze grading variation between pathology laboratories and between pathologists within individual laboratories using nationwide real-life data. Methods: We retrieved synoptic (n = 13,397) and narrative (n = 29,377) needle biopsy reports from the Dutch Pathology Registry and prostate-specific antigen values from The Netherlands Cancer Registration for prostate cancer patients diagnosed between January 2017 and December 2019. We determined laboratory-specific proportions per histologic grade and unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) for International Society of Urological Pathologists Grades 1 vs. 2–5 for 40 laboratories due to treatment implications for higher grades. Pathologist-specific proportions were determined for 21 laboratories that consented to this part of analysis. The synoptic reports of 21 laboratories were used for analysis of case-mix correction for PSA, age, year of diagnosis, number of biopsies and positive cores. Results: A total of 38,321 reports of 35,258 patients were included. Grade 1 ranged between 19.7% and 44.3% per laboratory (national mean = 34.1%). Out of 40 laboratories, 22 (55%) reported a significantly deviant OR, ranging from 0.48 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39–0.59) to 1.54 (CI 1.22–1.93). Case-mix correction was performed for 10,294 reports, altering the status of 3/21 (14%) laboratories, but increasing the observed variation (20.8% vs. 17.7%). Within 15/21 (71%) of laboratories, significant inter-pathologist variation existed. Conclusion: Substantial variation in prostate cancer grading was observed between and within Dutch pathology laboratories. Case-mix correction did not explain the variation. Better standardization of prostate cancer grading is warranted to optimize and harmonize treatment.
Collapse
|
25
|
Parkin CJ, Gilbourd D, Grills R, Chapman S, Weinstein S, Joshi N, Indrajit B, Kam J, Smilovic T, Shepherd A, Gikenye N, Louie-Johnsun MW. Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy remains a safe method in confirming a prostate cancer diagnosis: a multicentre Australian analysis of infection rates. World J Urol 2021; 40:453-458. [PMID: 34674018 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03862-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Worldwide, transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle remains the most common method of diagnosing prostate cancer. Due to high infective complications reported, some have suggested it is now time to abandon this technique in preference of a trans-perineal approach. The aim of this study was to report on the infection rates following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy in multiple Australian centres. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were collected from seven Australian centres across four states and territories that undertake transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, including major metropolitan and regional centres. In four centres, the data were collected prospectively. Rates of readmissions due to infection, urosepsis resulting in intensive care admission and mortality were recorded. RESULTS 12,240 prostate biopsies were performed in seven Australian centres between July 1998 and December 2020. There were 105 readmissions for infective complications with rates between centres ranging from 0.19 to 2.60% and an overall rate of 0.86%. Admission to intensive care with sepsis ranged from 0 to 0.23% and overall 0.03%. There was no mortality in the 12,240 cases. CONCLUSION Infective complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsies are very low, occurring in less than 1% of 12,240 biopsies. Though this study included a combination of both prospective and retrospective data and did not offer a comparison with a trans-perineal approach, TRUS prostate biopsy is a safe means of obtaining a prostate cancer diagnosis. Further prospective studies directly comparing the techniques are required prior to abandoning TRUS based upon infectious complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron J Parkin
- Department of Urology, Gosford Hospital, Central Coast Local Health District, Holden St, Gosford, NSW, 2250, Australia.
| | | | - Richard Grills
- Department of Surgery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,West Coast Urology, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Sue Chapman
- St. John of God Bunbury Hospital, College Grove, WA, Australia
| | | | - Neil Joshi
- Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Andrew Shepherd
- St. John of God Bunbury Hospital, College Grove, WA, Australia
| | - Njeri Gikenye
- Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark W Louie-Johnsun
- Department of Urology, Gosford Hospital, Central Coast Local Health District, Holden St, Gosford, NSW, 2250, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Gosford Private Hospital, North Gosford, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee CU, Choi J, Sung SH, Chung JH, Song W, Kang M, Sung HH, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Jeon HG. The Role of Prostate Combination Biopsy Consisting of Targeted and Additional Systematic Biopsy. J Clin Med 2021; 10:4804. [PMID: 34768322 PMCID: PMC8584506 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To identify the role of combination biopsy, which consists of both targeted and additional systematic cores, in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with PSA levels 2.5-15 ng/mL who have a suspicious prostate lesion (with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥ 3) on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) between January 2016 and December 2018. We analyzed biopsy results by PI-RADS score and biopsy methods (systematic, targeted, and combination biopsy). RESULTS Of the 711 total patients, an average of 4.0 ± 1.8 targeted and 8.6 ± 3.1 additional systematic biopsies were performed. The additional systematic biopsies were sampled outside the targeted biopsy area. The combination biopsies detected more csPCa (201 patients, 28.3%) than did the targeted (175 patients, 24.6%) or systematic (124 patients, 17.4%) biopsies alone (p < 0.001). In the initial biopsy samples, there was a 7% increase in the detection of csPCa than in targeted biopsy (62% to 69%). It increased by 11% in repeat biopsy (46% to 57%). There was no statistical significance in both groups (p = 0.3174). CONCLUSIONS Combination biopsy has the benefit of detecting csPCa in both initial and repeat biopsy when there is a suspicious lesion on mpMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung Un Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Urology, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (S.H.S.); (J.H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.H.S.); (B.C.J.); (S.I.S.); (S.S.J.); (H.M.L.)
| | - Joongwon Choi
- Department of Urology, VHS Medical Center, Seoul 05368, Korea;
| | - Si Hyun Sung
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Urology, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (S.H.S.); (J.H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.H.S.); (B.C.J.); (S.I.S.); (S.S.J.); (H.M.L.)
| | - Jae Hoon Chung
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Urology, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (S.H.S.); (J.H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.H.S.); (B.C.J.); (S.I.S.); (S.S.J.); (H.M.L.)
| | - Wan Song
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Urology, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (S.H.S.); (J.H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.H.S.); (B.C.J.); (S.I.S.); (S.S.J.); (H.M.L.)
| | - Minyong Kang
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Urology, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (S.H.S.); (J.H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.H.S.); (B.C.J.); (S.I.S.); (S.S.J.); (H.M.L.)
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Urology, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (S.H.S.); (J.H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.H.S.); (B.C.J.); (S.I.S.); (S.S.J.); (H.M.L.)
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Urology, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (S.H.S.); (J.H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.H.S.); (B.C.J.); (S.I.S.); (S.S.J.); (H.M.L.)
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Urology, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (S.H.S.); (J.H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.H.S.); (B.C.J.); (S.I.S.); (S.S.J.); (H.M.L.)
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Urology, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (S.H.S.); (J.H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.H.S.); (B.C.J.); (S.I.S.); (S.S.J.); (H.M.L.)
| | - Hyun Moo Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Urology, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (S.H.S.); (J.H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.H.S.); (B.C.J.); (S.I.S.); (S.S.J.); (H.M.L.)
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Samsung Medical Center, Department of Urology, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (S.H.S.); (J.H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.H.S.); (B.C.J.); (S.I.S.); (S.S.J.); (H.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ferro M, Crocetto F, Bruzzese D, Imbriaco M, Fusco F, Longo N, Napolitano L, La Civita E, Cennamo M, Liotti A, Lecce M, Russo G, Insabato L, Imbimbo C, Terracciano D. Prostate Health Index and Multiparametric MRI: Partners in Crime Fighting Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13184723. [PMID: 34572950 PMCID: PMC8466029 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In the last decades, the widespread use of PSA as the standard tool for prostate cancer diagnosis led to a high rate of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. More recently, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) became part of the diagnostic pathway, and several next-generation PSA-based tests (PHI, PHI density, 4Kscore, STHLM3) have been proposed. The multivariable approach promises to help with a better stratification of PCa patients at initial diagnosis. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the prostate health index (PHI) and mpMRI for the prediction of positive biopsy and of high-grade PCa at radical prostatectomy (RP). Our findings suggested that PHI had a better ability than mpMRI to predict positive biopsy, whereas a comparable performance in the identification of pathological aggressive PCa was pointed out. Notably, PHI and PHI density might represent useful biomarkers to recognize high-grade PCa in patients with low or uncertain PI-RADS scores on mpMRI. Abstract Widespread use of PSA as the standard tool for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis led to a high rate of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the prostate health index (PHI) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the prediction of positive biopsy and of high-grade PCa at radical prostatectomy (RP). To this end, we prospectively enrolled 196 biopsy-naïve patients who underwent mpMRI. A subgroup of 116 subjects with biopsy-proven PCa underwent surgery. We found that PHI significantly outperformed both PI-RADS score (difference in AUC: 0.14; p < 0.001) and PHI density (difference in AUC: 0.08; p = 0.002) in the ability to predict positive biopsy with a cut-off value of 42.7 as the best threshold. Conversely, comparing the performance in the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) at RP, we found that PHI ≥ 61.68 and PI-RADS score ≥ 4 were able to identify csPCa (Gleason score ≥ 7 (3 + 4)) both alone and added to a base model including age, PSA, fPSA-to-tPSA ratio and prostate volume. In conclusion, PHI had a better ability than PI-RADS score to predict positive biopsy, whereas it had a comparable performance in the identification of pathological csPCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (N.L.); (L.N.); (C.I.)
| | - Dario Bruzzese
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (D.B.); (G.R.)
| | - Massimo Imbriaco
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.I.); (L.I.)
| | - Ferdinando Fusco
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (N.L.); (L.N.); (C.I.)
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (N.L.); (L.N.); (C.I.)
| | - Evelina La Civita
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (E.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.L.); (M.L.)
| | - Michele Cennamo
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (E.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.L.); (M.L.)
| | - Antonietta Liotti
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (E.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.L.); (M.L.)
| | - Manuela Lecce
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (E.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.L.); (M.L.)
| | - Gianluca Russo
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (D.B.); (G.R.)
| | - Luigi Insabato
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.I.); (L.I.)
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (N.L.); (L.N.); (C.I.)
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (E.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.L.); (M.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-8-1746-2038
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Comparison of Accuracies between Real-Time Nonrigid and Rigid Registration in the MRI-US Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11081481. [PMID: 34441415 PMCID: PMC8392836 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly important in the detection and localization of prostate cancer. Regarding suspicious lesions on MRI, a targeted biopsy using MRI fused with ultrasound (US) is widely used. To achieve a successful targeted biopsy, a precise registration between MRI and US is essential. The purpose of our study was to show any decrease in errors using a real-time nonrigid registration technique for prostate biopsy. Nineteen patients with suspected prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled in this study. Registration accuracy was calculated by the measuring distance of corresponding points by rigid and nonrigid registration between MRI and US, and compared for rigid and nonrigid registration methods. Overall cancer detection rates were also evaluated by patient and by core. Prostate volume was measured automatically from MRI and manually from US, and compared to each other. Mean distances between the corresponding points in MRI and US were 5.32 ± 2.61 mm for rigid registration and 2.11 ± 1.37 mm for nonrigid registration (p < 0.05). Cancer was diagnosed in 11 of 19 patients (57.9%), and in 67 of 266 biopsy cores (25.2%). There was no significant difference in prostate-volume measurement between the automatic and manual methods (p = 0.89). In conclusion, nonrigid registration reduces targeting errors.
Collapse
|
29
|
Wenzel M, Preisser F, Wittler C, Hoeh B, Wild PJ, Tschäbunin A, Bodelle B, Würnschimmel C, Tilki D, Graefen M, Becker A, Karakiewicz PI, Chun FKH, Kluth LA, Köllermann J, Mandel P. Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11050882. [PMID: 34063557 PMCID: PMC8155831 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The impact of MRI-lesion targeted (TB) and systematic biopsy (SB) Gleason score (GS) as a predictor for final pathological GS still remains unclear. Methods: All patients with TB + SB, and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 01/2014-12/2020 were analyzed. Rank correlation coefficient predicted concordance with pathological GS for patients’ TB and SB GS, as well as for the combined effect of SB + TB. Results: Of 159 eligible patients, 77% were biopsy naïve. For SB taken in addition to TB, a Spearman’s correlation of +0.33 was observed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading, and downgrading were 37.1, 37.1 and 25.8%, respectively. For TB, a +0.52 correlation was computed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading for TB biopsy GS were 45.9, 33.3, and 20.8%, respectively. For the combination of SB + TB, a correlation of +0.59 was observed. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading were 49.7, 15.1 and 35.2%, respectively. The combined effect of SB + TB resulted in a lower upgrading rate, relative to TB and SB (both p < 0.001), but a higher downgrading rate, relative to TB (p < 0.01). Conclusions: GS obtained from TB provided higher concordance and lower upgrading and downgrading rates, relative to SB GS with regard to final pathology. The combined effect of SB + TB led to the highest concordance rate and the lowest upgrading rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (C.W.); (P.I.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: + 49-69-6301-83147; Fax: + 49-69-6301-80069
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Clarissa Wittler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Peter J. Wild
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (P.J.W.); (A.T.); (J.K.)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
- Wildlab, University Hospital Frankfurt MVZ GmbH, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Alexandra Tschäbunin
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (P.J.W.); (A.T.); (J.K.)
| | - Boris Bodelle
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany;
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (C.W.); (P.I.K.)
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (D.T.); (M.G.)
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (D.T.); (M.G.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (D.T.); (M.G.)
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (C.W.); (P.I.K.)
| | - Felix K. H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Jens Köllermann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (P.J.W.); (A.T.); (J.K.)
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|