Radiological tumor response and histopathological correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy as a bridge to liver transplantation

Longitudinal assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma response to stereotactic body radiation using gadoxetate-enhanced MRI: A case series

PURPOSE

To describe the longitudinal response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and who underwent liver transplant (LT) using gadoxetate-enhanced MRI.

METHODS

Five men (median age 61y, range 57-64y) with 6 HCCs treated with SBRT (median dose 50 Gy) who subsequently underwent LT were included in this retrospective study. Patients underwent gadoxetate-enhanced MRI before and after SBRT over a period of 3-18 months. Response was assessed using RECIST1.1, mRECIST, LI-RADS and image subtraction, by 2 observers in consensus. Percentage of pathologic tumor necrosis was evaluated.

RESULTS

LT was performed 278 days (IQR, 148-418d) after completion of SBRT and 48d after the last MRI. Histopathology demonstrated tumor necrosis of 48 ± 42% (range, 10-100%). Mean tumor size at baseline and last post-treatment MRIs pre-LT were 2.6 ± 0.8 cm and 2.4 ± 0.9 cm. Enhancing tumor component size at baseline MRI and last post-treatment MRI pre-LT were 1.6 ± 0.8 cm and 0.9 ± 1.0 cm. Responses assessed at the last LRI pre-LT were: partial response (PR, n = 3), stable disease (SD, n = 3) using RECIST1.1; complete response (CR, n = 2), partial response (PR, n = 2), stable disease (SD, n = 2) using mRECIST; and LR-TR viable (n = 4), LR-TR non-viable (n = 2) using LI-RADS. At the last MRI pre-LT, per-lesion features of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE, 4/6), portal venous washout (3/6) and capsule (3/6) were observed. 5/6 lesions displayed a hypointense perilesional halo on hepatobiliary phase with a mean delay of 3.1 months post-SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

This case-series showed decreased size, persistent APHE, and incomplete pathologic necrosis in most HCCs treated with SBRT undergoing transplant.

Updates on LI-RADS Treatment Response Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focusing on MRI

As the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and subsequent treatments with liver-directed therapies rise, the complexity of assessing lesion response has also increased. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (LI-RADS TRA) was created to standardize the assessment of response after locoregional therapy (LRT) on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Originally created based on expert opinion, these guidelines are currently undergoing revision based on emerging evidence. While many studies support the use of LR-TRA for evaluation of HCC response after thermal ablation and intra-arterial embolic therapy, data suggest a need for refinements to improve assessment after radiation therapy. In this manuscript, we review expected MR imaging findings after different forms of LRT, clarify how to apply the current LI-RADS TRA by type of LRT, explore emerging literature on LI-RADS TRA, and highlight future updates to the algorithm. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Early complete tumor response as a survival predictor in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy

Background and Purpose

To evaluate the different response patterns after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and their predictive value in local control and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods

Seventy-two HCC patients who were treated with SBRT during 2015-2020 were included in this retrospective study. The assessment was made using MRI, CT, and PET-CT. Local and systemic responses were determined according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria during follow up. Patients were categorized as early responders (complete response during 6 months after radiotherapy) or non-early responders (the rest of the patients). Prognostic factors were determined using multivariate logistic models.

Results

The median follow-up was 24.0 months (range, 7.7-74.5 months). We found that 84.7%（61/72) of patients achieved a complete response. Early responses occurred in 45 patients (45/72, 62.5%), and they had 1-, 2-, and 5- year intrahepatic outfield-free survival (OutFFS) rates of 86.2%, 80.3%, and 76.3% vs. 55.3%, 44.7%, and 33.5% in non-early responses patients, whereas the 1-, 2-, and 5- year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 95.5%, 84.5% and 79.5% and 74.1%, 56.2% and 56.2%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 97.7%, 92.1%, 79.1%, and 85.2%, 53.8%, and 40.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that early tumor response was an independent predictor of OutFFS, DMFS, and OS.

Conclusions

Early complete tumor response within 6 months after radiotherapy predicted better intrahepatic outfield-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival outcomes. Confirmation is warranted for early response on SBRT to guide decision making.

Prospective Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Waitlist for Liver Transplant

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There are no prospective data on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a bridge to liver transplantation for HCC. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT as bridging therapy, with comparison with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Patients were prospectively enrolled for SBRT under a standardized protocol from July 2015 and compared with a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent TACE or HIFU from 2010. The primary endpoint was tumor control rate at 1 year after bridging therapy. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of dropout, toxicity, and posttransplant survival. During the study period, 150 patients were evaluated (SBRT, n = 40; TACE, n = 59; HIFU, n = 51). The tumor control rate at 1 year was significantly higher after SBRT compared with TACE and HIFU (92.3%, 43.5%, and 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.02). With competing risk analysis, the cumulative incidence of dropout at 1 and 3 years after listing was lower after SBRT (15.1% and 23.3%) compared with TACE (28.9% and 45.8%; P = 0.034) and HIFU (33.3% and 45.1%; P = 0.032). Time-to-progression at 1 and 3 years was also superior after SBRT (10.8%, 18.5% in SBRT, 45%, 54.9% in TACE, and 47.6%, 62.8% in HIFU; P < 0.001). The periprocedural toxicity was similar, without any difference in perioperative complications and patient and recurrence-free survival rates after transplant. Pathological complete response was more frequent after SBRT compared with TACE and HIFU (48.1% vs. 25% vs. 17.9%, respectively; P = 0.037). In multivariable analysis, tumor size <3 cm, listing alpha-fetoprotein <200 ng/mL, Child A, and SBRT significantly reduced the risk of dropout.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT was safe, with a significantly higher tumor control rate, reduced the risk of waitlist dropout, and should be used as an alternative to conventional bridging therapies.