Feasibility and safety of bedside percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with severe cholangitis

Impact of timing of ERCP on long term outcomes of ERCP for acute cholangitis - A single center retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Acute cholangitis is a critical medical emergency. The association between the timing of ERCP and clinical outcomes of acute cholangitis is still debated. The current study aims to evaluate whether ERCP within 48 h (urgent) is associated with improved long term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This study is a single-center retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. All patients admitted with acute cholangitis as per Tokyo guidelines at AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad between January 2022 to December 2022 were included. We evaluated the association between urgent ERCP and length of hospital stay, need for reintervention and readmissions, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of consecutive 301 patients underwent ERCP for acute cholangitis; of which 217 patients (31.3 % females; mean age 54.02 ± 14.9 years) underwent urgent ERCP. The remaining 84 (32.1 % females; mean age 56.56 ± 13.9 years) underwent routine ERCP. Fifty-eight (26.7 %) and 22 (26.2 %) patients with Grade III underwent urgent and routine ERCP respectively. The median (IQR) hospital stay for urgent ERCP was 8.00 (6.00 - 11.00) days and for routine ERCP was 11.00(8.00 - 15.00; p value 0.0001), with similar hospital stay post ERCP (p 0.26). There was no significant difference in mortality upto one year between patients who underwent urgent (22.1 %;48/217) or routine ERCP (31.0 %;26/84, p 0.135). The cox proportional hazard model showed that mortality is independently associated with older age (HR 1.034;95 %CI: 1.013 - 1.054; p 0.001) and malignancy (HR 8.64;95 %CI:4.728 - 15.790; p 0.0001). There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of need for reinterventions and readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Urgent ERCP for acute cholangitis is associated comparable overall mortality, need for reinterventions, and readmissions with decreased total length of hospital stay. There is an unmet need to confirm these findings by randomized controlled studies.

The role of endoscopy in malignant hilar obstruction

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHO) is a medical challenge as regards both forming a correct diagnosis and its adequate management, in terms of treatment alternatives and palliative options. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for the underlying disease, but the majority of patients are not suitable candidates because of an unresectable tumor or poor performance status. Biliary drainage (BD) can be achieved through the percutaneous transhepatic route or endoscopically, and the choice depends on a host of factors, including biliary anatomy and comorbidity of the patient. Though there is no consensus, the endoscopic approach is usually preferred over the former. Endoscopy can aid in both diagnosis (collection of histological as well as cytological samples, direct visualization of suspected malignant pathology, or use of endoscopic ultrasound [EUS] for evaluation and locoregional staging), and in achieving internal BD. Advances in the development of various stents, accessories and, more recently, the use of EUS have in fact further expanded its application in MHO management. The choice of stents to be used (type, make, and number), palliation methods, deployment techniques and the use of local ablative strategy are still evolving and require more data. The complexity of management of MHO mandates that each patient should receive a "personalized approach", all the way from establishing a diagnosis until final treatment, with the help of a multidisciplinary team effort. Herein, we provide a comprehensive literature review of the current role of endoscopy for MHO, according to its applications in various clinical settings.

Ultrasound-guided Bedside Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Critically Ill: A Friend Indeed

How to cite this article: Pachisia AV, Govil D. Ultrasound-guided Bedside Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Critically Ill: A Friend Indeed. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(1):4-5.

Is Ultrasound-guided Bedside Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Safe and Feasible in Critically Ill Patients with Severe Cholangitis? A Preliminary Single-center Experience

Background and aim

Severe cholangitis secondary to biliary obstruction carries high mortality unless biliary drainage is performed urgently. Owing to various patient-related and logistical issues, bedside biliary drainage is considered a salvage therapeutic option. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasonography (USG)-guided biliary drainage at the bedside in patients with severe cholangitis admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Materials and methods

A total of 20 patients with severe cholangitis admitted to ICU who underwent bedside percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) under USG guidance were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical outcomes, details about the PTBD procedure, and complications were recorded and analyzed.

Results

Among 20 patients, 13 were male and 7 were female with a mean age of 50.5 years. The most common cause of biliary obstruction was gall bladder malignancy (45%, n = 9) followed by cholangiocarcinoma (25%, n = 5). Left- and right-sided PTBD was performed in 40% (n = 8) and 35% (n = 7) patients, respectively, while 25% (n = 5) of patients underwent bilateral PTBD. The technical success rate was 100%. A total of 65% (n = 13) of patients were discharged from ICU upon improvement while the remaining 35% (n = 7) died despite bedside PTBD. None of the patients had any major procedure-related complications.

Conclusions

Ultrsound-guided bedside PTBD seems to be a safe and effective option in critically ill patients with severe cholangitis when shifting of patients is not feasible.

How to cite this article

Singh J, Tripathy TP, Patel R, Chandel K. Is Ultrasound-guided Bedside Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Safe and Feasible in Critically Ill Patients with Severe Cholangitis? A Preliminary Single-center Experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(1):16-21.

Role of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage as an Adjunct to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Background

There is limited literature on the role of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) as an adjunct to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study evaluates the role of PTBD in patients with failed ERCP or post-ERCP cholangitis.

Methods

Retrospective evaluation of clinical and intervention records of patients with biliary obstruction referred for PTBD following failed ERCP or post-ERCP cholangitis was performed. The cause of biliary obstruction, baseline serum bilirubin, white blood cell (WBC) count, serum creatinine, and procalcitonin were recorded. Technical success and clinical success (resolution of cholangitis, reduction in bilirubin levels, WBC count, creatinine, and procalcitonin) were assessed.

Results

Sixty-three patients (35 females, mean age 51.4 years) were included. Indications for ERCP included malignant causes in 47 (74.6%) cases and benign causes in 16 (25.4%) cases. Indications for PTBD were failed ERCP in 21 (33.3%) and post-ERCP cholangitis in 42 (66.7%). PTBD was technically successful in all patients. Clinical success rate was 68.2% in the overall group. Mild hemobilia was noted in five (7.9%) patients. There were no major complications or PTBD related mortality. Cholangitis and acute kidney injury resolved following PTBD in 63.1% and 80% of the patients, respectively. Total serum bilirubin reduced by 47.8% and 69.4% after one week and one month of the PTBD, respectively. The average fall in procalcitonin was 5.17 ng/mL after one week of the PTBD.

Conclusion

PTBD is an important adjunctive drainage procedure in patients with ERCP failure or post-ERCP cholangitis.

Survival benefit of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for malignant biliary tract obstruction-a prospective study comparing external and internal drainage techniques

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical results of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with non-operable malignant biliary tract obstruction (MBTO) and the survival benefit of internal drainage.

METHODS

Prospective data of consecutive patients of PTBD from May 2014 to August 2017 was analyzed for 30-day, 90-day and 1-year mortality, and mean survival of patients undergoing external drainage (ED) and internal drainage (ID) using internal-external ring biliary catheterization or biliary stent were compared. Other important variables evaluated were drop in the total bilirubin (TBil) levels, improvement in pain and pruritus, procedure-related complications, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

In 87 cases (54 male, 33 female) with mean age 37.3 y (22-70 y; 95% CI: 31.1 y-43.5 y), 10, 45 and 32 patients underwent stenting, external and internal-external catheterization, respectively (total 152 procedures [> 1 in 35.63%, n = 31]). PTBD resulted in decrease in mean TBil by 8.2738 ± 0.912 mg/dL at 30 days (P < 0.001), 55.14% (n = 48) cases reaching 3 mg/dL at mean 45 days, and 35/48 cases received chemotherapy. Overall mortality was 6.89%, 37.93% and 90.80% at 30 days, 90 days and 1 year, respectively. Mean survival with ID (236.40 ± 33.37 days) was better than with ED (110.35 ± 26.16 days) (P < 0.001). Pain (62.06%; n = 54; mean Visual Analog Scale [VAS] score = 6.7) improved significantly (mean VAS score 3.4; P < 0.001). Pruritus (n = 29) was relieved in 100% of the cases. Complication rate of 18.39% (n = 16) and no procedure-related death were seen.

CONCLUSION

PTBD offers a safe and significant improvement in TBil, pain, and pruritus in non-operable MBTO, with ID offering additional survival benefit over ED.