Modification and comparison of CT criteria in the preoperative assessment of hepatic arterial invasion by hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers

Backgrounds/Aims

Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021.

Methods

Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop.

Results

In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing.

Conclusions

The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.

Short-term and long-term clinical outcomes of combined major vessel resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis

Purpose

In the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA), combined resection of important hepatic vessels remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative complications and prognosis of combined and non-combined major vessel resections in patients undergoing radical resection for HCCA.

Methods

In this study, patients with HCCA who underwent curative resection between January 2007 and December 2018 were retrospectively enrolled. Postoperative complications and prognosis between the groups were compared using propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis.

Results

There were 310 patients included in this study. The portal vein resection (PVR) and hepatic artery resection (HAR) groups had a higher incidence of postoperative complications than the control group. Patients in the HAR group had an increased risk of abdominal and pleural effusion after surgery. Patients who underwent combined PVR had better overall survival (OS; P = 0.020) and disease-free survival (DFS; P = 0.020). After curative-intent resection, patients in the HAR group had improved OS (P = 0.027) and DFS (P = 0.023). The postoperative complications of combined vascular resection (VR) did not worsen long-term survival for patients.

Conclusion

In patients with HCCA, combined VR improved prognosis. The postoperative complications of combined VR do not worsen patient survival. Therefore, radical surgical resection is recommended.

Prediction model based on preoperative CT findings for carotid artery invasion in patients with head and neck masses

Objectives

To investigate the performance of a model in predicting carotid artery (CA) invasion in patients with head and neck masses using computed tomography (CT).

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with head and neck masses who underwent CT and surgery between January 2013 and July 2021. Patient characteristics and ten CT features were assessed by two radiologists. The patients were randomly allocated to a training cohort (n=106) and a validation cohort (n=109). Independent risk factors for CA invasion were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The predictive model was established as a nomogram using the training cohort. In addition, the calibration, discrimination, reclassification, and clinical application of the model were assessed in the validation cohort.

Results

A total of 215 patients were evaluated, including 54 patients with CA invasion. Vascular wall deformation (odds ratio [OR], 7.17; p=0.02) and the extent of encasement to the CA (OR, 1.02; p<0.001) were independent predictors of CA invasion in the multivariable analysis in the training cohort. The performance of the model was similar between the training and validation cohort, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.88-0.98) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.96) (p=0.07), respectively. The calibration curve showed a good agreement between the predicted and actual probabilities.

Conclusion

A predictive model for carotid artery invasion can be defined based on features that come from patient characteristics and CT data to help in improve surgical planning and invasion evaluation.

Intravenous combined with intrabiliary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of resectability of hilar cholangiocarcinomas

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the application value of combined intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IV-CEUS) with intrabiliary contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IB-CEUS) in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) resectability.

METHODS

Clinical data from 82 patients with HCCA confirmed by surgery and pathology were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative IV-CEUS + IB-CEUS and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) were performed and the results were compared with surgical and pathological findings.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the Bismuth-Corlette classification confirmed by IV-CEUS + IB-CEUS and MRCP was 95.12% (78/82) and 87.8% (72/82), respectively. The diagnostic precision of IV-CEUS + IB-CEUS was better than MRCP (p = 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and precision of CEUS for diagnosing lymph node metastases (72.7%, 93.3%, and 87.8%), intrahepatic metastases (78.6%, 98.5%, and 93.9%), invasion of the hepatic artery (92.9%, 98.5%, and 97.6%) and invasion of the portal vein (93.8%, 98.5%, and 97.6%) of HCCA were, respectively. The consistency between the preoperative evaluation of resectability confirmed by IV-CEUS +IB-CEUS and MRCP was 85.4% (70/82) and 78.0% (64/82), respectively. In addition, the evaluations did not have statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two evaluations (p = 0.266).

CONCLUSION

IV-CEUS combined with IB-CEUS has significant value in classifying HCCA and evaluating the resectability of lymph node metastases, liver metastases, and vessel invasion.