Novel deep learning-based noise reduction technique for prostate magnetic resonance imaging

Minimizing prostate diffusion weighted MRI examination time through deep learning reconstruction

PURPOSE

To study the diagnostic image quality of high b-value diffusion weighted images (DWI) derived from standard and variably reduced datasets reconstructed with a commercially available deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 52 patients undergoing conventional prostate MRI with raw image data reconstructed using both conventional 2D Cartesian and DLR algorithms. Simulated shortened DWI acquisition times were performed by reconstructing images using DLR datasets harboring a reduced number of excitations (NEX). Two radiologists independently evaluated the image quality using a 4-point Likert scale. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis was performed for the entire cohort and a subset of patients identified as having clinically significant prostate cancer identified at MRI, and later confirmed by pathology.

RESULTS

Radiologists perceived less image noise for both restricted and large field of view (FOV) standard NEX dataset DLR diffusion images compared to conventionally reconstructed images with good interreader agreement. Diagnostic image quality was maintained for all DLR images using variably reduced NEX compared to conventionally reconstructed images employing the standard NEX. Improved signal to noise was observed for the restricted FOV DLR images compared to conventional reconstruction using standard NEX. DLR diffusion images derived from reduced NEX datasets translated to time reductions of up to 68 % and 39 % for the restricted and large FOV series acquisitions, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DLR of diffusion weighted images can reduce image noise at standard NEX and potentially reduce prostate MRI exam time when utilizing reduced NEX datasets without sacrificing diagnostic image quality.

Comparison of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging and multiplexed sensitivity-encoding combined with deep learning-based reconstruction in breast magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE) with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for breast imaging in comparison with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and MUSE alone.

METHODS

This study was conducted using conventional single-shot DWI and MUSE data of female participants who underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from June to December 2023. The k-space data in MUSE were reconstructed using both conventional reconstruction and DLR. Two experienced radiologists conducted quantitative analyses of DWI, MUSE, and MUSE-DLR images by obtaining the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of lesions and normal tissue and qualitative analyses by using a 5-point Likert scale to assess the image quality. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Image scores, SNR, CNR, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements among the three sequences were compared using the Friedman test, with significance defined at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

In evaluations of the images of 51 female participants using the three sequences, the two radiologists exhibited good agreement (ICC = 0.540-1.000, P < 0.05). MUSE-DLR showed significantly better SNR than MUSE (P < 0.001), while the ADC values within lesions and tissues did not differ significantly among the three sequences (P = 0.924, P = 0.636, respectively). In the subjective assessments, MUSE and MUSE-DLR scored significantly higher than conventional DWI in overall image quality, geometric distortion and axillary lymph node (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In comparison with conventional DWI, MUSE-DLR yielded improved image quality with only a slightly longer acquisition time.

How does intelligent noise reduction software influence the image quality in pelvic digital radiography; a phantom study

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to evaluate the effects of a novel noise reduction software (INR, Canon Europe, Amsterdam, NL) on image quality (IQ) in Digital Radiography (DR) pelvic phantom images.

METHODS

In total, 53 pelvic phantom images and 360 technical images of a Contrast Detail Radiography phantom (CDRAD) were collected, including 8 different exposure levels (between 0.8 and 40 mAs at 70 kV) and 6 intensities of INR (ranging from settings 0-10). The pelvic images were evaluated by three reporting radiographers using absolute Visual Grading Analysis (VGA). The CDRAD images were analyzed with a CDRAD computer software.

RESULTS

The VGA showed that the images with the INR software had higher IQ than the images with no INR. The observers gave a high VGA score to the images with INR of 3.2 mAs and higher. There was a tendency for an INR level of 5 or 7 to give the highest VGA scores. In addition, the CDRAD study showed a significant improvement in IQ with increasing INR levels at the lower exposure levels.

CONCLUSION

An improvement in overall IQ was seen at lower exposure levels when the INR software was used both for the VGA and the CDRAD study. Clinical tests including patient images need to be performed before implementing INR in practice to verify accurate diagnostic performance.

Interpreting Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Beyond Adenocarcinoma-Anatomical Variations, Mimickers, and Post-intervention Changes

Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer. However, its accuracy can be confounded by a spectrum of noncancerous entities with similar radiological features, posing a challenge for definitive diagnosis. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the MRI phenotypes of both common and rare benign prostate conditions that may be mistaken for malignancy. The narrative encompasses anatomical variants, other neoplastic processes, inflammatory conditions, and alterations secondary to medical interventions. Furthermore, this review underscores the critical role of MRI quality in diagnostic accuracy and explores the emerging contributions of artificial intelligence in enhancing image interpretation.

Enhanced image quality and lesion detection in FLAIR MRI of white matter hyperintensity through deep learning-based reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To delve deeper into the study of degenerative diseases, it becomes imperative to investigate whether deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) can improve the evaluation of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) on 3.0T scanners, and compare its lesion detection capabilities with conventional reconstruction (CR).

METHODS

A total of 131 participants (mean age, 46 years ±17; 46 men) were included in the study. The images of these participants were evaluated by readers blinded to clinical data. Two readers independently assessed subjective image indicators on a 4-point scale. The severity of WMH was assessed by four raters using the Fazekas scale. To evaluate the relative detection capabilities of each method, we employed the Wilcoxon signed rank test to compare scores between the DLR and the CR group. Additionally, we assessed interrater reliability using weighted k statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient to test consistency among the raters.

RESULTS

In terms of subjective image scoring, the DLR group exhibited significantly better scores compared to the CR group (P < 0.001). Regarding the severity of WMH, the DL group demonstrated superior performance in detecting lesions. Majority readers agreed that the DL group provided clearer visualization of the lesions compared to the conventional group.

CONCLUSION

DLR exhibits notable advantages over CR, including subjective image quality, lesion detection sensitivity, and inter reader reliability.

Assessment of multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging for glioma based on a deep learning reconstruction approach with the denoising method

BACKGROUND

Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with denoising has been reported as potentially improving the image quality of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multi-modal MRI is a critical non-invasive method for tumor detection, surgery planning, and prognosis assessment; however, the DLR on multi-modal glioma imaging has not been assessed.

PURPOSE

To assess multi-modal MRI for glioma based on the DLR method.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We assessed multi-modal images of 107 glioma patients (49 preoperative and 58 postoperative). All the images were reconstructed with both DLR and conventional reconstruction methods, encompassing T1-weighted (T1W), contrast-enhanced T1W (CE-T1), T2-weighted (T2W), and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR). The image quality was evaluated using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and edge sharpness. Visual assessment and diagnostic assessment were performed blindly by neuroradiologists.

RESULTS

In contrast with conventionally reconstructed images, (residual) tumor SNR for all modalities and tumor to white/gray matter CNR from DLR images were higher in T1W, T2W, and T2-FLAIR sequences. The visual assessment of DLR images demonstrated the superior visualization of tumor in T2W, edema in T2-FLAIR, enhanced tumor and necrosis part in CE-T1, and fewer artifacts in all modalities. Improved diagnostic efficiency and confidence were observed for preoperative cases with DLR images.

CONCLUSION

DLR of multi-modal MRI reconstruction prototype for glioma has demonstrated significant improvements in image quality. Moreover, it increased diagnostic efficiency and confidence of glioma.

Effectiveness of deep learning-based reconstruction for improvement of image quality and liver tumor detectability in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in improving image quality and tumor detectability of isovoxel high-resolution breath-hold fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging (HR-BH-FS-T1WI) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective evaluated 42 patients with 98 liver tumors who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI between March 2023 and May 2023 using three techniques based on HBP imaging: isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI reconstructed (1) with DLR (BH-DLR +) and (2) without DLR (BH-DLR -) and (3) HR-FS-T1WI scanned with a free-breathing technique using a navigator-echo-triggered technique and DLR (Navi-DLR +). The three techniques were qualitatively and quantitatively compared by the Friedman test and the Bonferroni post-hoc test. Tumor detectability was compared using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

BH-DLR + (3.85, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than BH-DLR - (2.84) and Navi-DLR + (3.37) (p < 0.0167), and Navi-DLR + showed significantly better scores than BH-DLR - (p < 0.0167). BH-DLR + (3.77) and BH-DLR - (3.77) showed significantly better qualitative scores for respiratory motion artifact than Navi-DLR + (2.75) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in scores between BH-DLR + and BH-DLR - (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (0.32) and Navi-DLR + (0.33) showed significantly higher lesion-to-nonlesion CR than BH-DLR - (0.29) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in lesion-to-nonlesion CR between BH-DLR + and Navi-DLR + (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (89.8%) showed significantly better tumor detectability than BH-DLR - (76.0%) and Navi-DLR + (77.6%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of DLR for isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI was effective in improving image quality and tumor detectability.

Deep learning-based reconstruction for 3-dimensional heavily T2-weighted fat-saturated magnetic resonance (MR) myelography in epidural fluid detection: image quality and diagnostic performance

Background

Heavily T2-weighted fat-saturated (HT2W-FS) magnetic resonance myelography (MRM) is useful for diagnosing the cause of intracranial hypotension. Recently, deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) has been utilized to improve image signal-to-noise ratios and sharpness while reducing artifacts, all without lengthening acquisition times. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance and image quality of conventional reconstruction (CR) and DLR of 3-dimensional (3D) HT2W-FS MRM applied to detecting epidural fluid in patients with clinically suspected intracranial hypotension.

Methods

This retrospective study included 21 magnetic resonance myelography examinations using both CR and DLR in 21 patients who experienced orthostatic headache between April 2021 and September 2022. Quantitative image quality evaluation was performed by comparing signal-to-noise ratios at the lower thoracic levels. The image quality and artifacts were graded by three readers. The presence of epidural fluid was reported with a confidence score by two readers, and the area under the receiver operating curve, interobserver agreement, and inter-image-set agreement were evaluated. The conspicuity of the dura mater where the epidural fluid was detected was also investigated.

Results

Quantitative and subjective image quality, and artifacts significantly improved with DLR (all P<0.001). Diagnostic performance of DLR was higher for both readers [reader 1: area under the curve (AUC) of CR =0.929; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.902-0.950, AUC of DLR =0.965 (95% CI: 0.944-0.979), P=0.007; reader 2: AUC of CR =0.834 (95% CI: 0.798-0.866), AUC of DLR =0.877 (0.844-0.905), P=0.040]. Correlation with standard care of MRM in CR and DLR were both strong in reader 1 (rho =0.868-0.919, P<0.001), but was respectively strong and moderate in reader 2 (rho =0.734-0.805, P<0.001). Interobserver agreement was substantial (κ=0.708-0.762). The inter-image-set agreement was almost perfect for reader 1 (κ=0.907) and was substantial for reader 2 (κ=0.750). Dura mater conspicuity significantly improved with DLR (P<0.014, reader 1; P<0.001, readers 2 and 3).

Conclusions

HT2W-FS magnetic resonance myelography with DLR demonstrates substantial improvements in image quality and may improve confidence in detecting epidural fluid.

Verification of image quality improvement by deep learning reconstruction to 1.5 T MRI in T2-weighted images of the prostate gland

This study aimed to evaluate whether the image quality of 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate is equal to or higher than that of 3 T MRI by applying deep learning reconstruction (DLR). To objectively analyze the images from the 13 healthy volunteers, we measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the images obtained by the 1.5 T scanner with and without DLR, as well as for images obtained by the 3 T scanner. In the subjective, T2W images of the prostate were visually evaluated by two board-certified radiologists. The SNRs and CNRs in 1.5 T images with DLR were higher than that in 3 T images. Subjective image scores were better for 1.5 T images with DLR than 3 T images. The use of the DLR technique in 1.5 T MRI substantially improved the SNR and image quality of T2W images of the prostate gland, as compared to 3 T MRI.

Three-dimensional heavily T2-weighted FLAIR in the detection of blood-labyrinthine barrier leakage in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss: comparison with T1 sequences and application of deep learning-based reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Blood-labyrinthine barrier leakage has been reported in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). We compared immediate post-contrast 3D heavily T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), T1 spin echo (SE), and 3D T1 gradient echo (GRE) sequences, and heavily T2-weighted FLAIR (hvT2F) with and without deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in detecting perilymphatic enhancement.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients with unilateral SSNHL who underwent ear MRI with three sequences were included. We compared asymmetry scores, confidence scores, and detection rates of perilymphatic enhancement among the three sequences and obtained 3D hvT2F with DLR from 35 patients. The above parameters and subjective image quality between 3D hvT2F with and without DLR were compared.

RESULTS

Asymmetry scores and detection rate of 3D hvT2F were significantly higher than 3D GRE T1 and SE T1 (respectively, 1.37, 0.11, 0.19; p < 0.001). Asymmetry scores significantly increased with DLR compared to 3D hvT2F for experienced and inexperienced readers (respectively, 1.77 vs. 1.40, p = 0.036; 1.49 vs. 1.03, p = 0.012). The detection rate significantly increased only for the latter (57.1% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.022). Patients with perilymphatic enhancement had significantly higher air conduction thresholds on initial (77.96 vs. 57.79, p = 0.002) and 5 days after presentation (63.38 vs. 41.85, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

3D hvT2F significantly increased the detectability of perilymphatic enhancement compared to 3D GRE T1 and SE T1. DLR further improved the conspicuity of perilymphatic enhancement in 3D hvT2F. 3D hvT2F and DLR are useful for evaluating blood-labyrinthine barrier leakage; furthermore, they might provide prognostic value in the early post-treatment period.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Ten-minute post-contrast 3D heavily T2-weighed FLAIR imaging is a potentially efficacious sequence in demonstrating perilymphatic enhancement in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss and may be further improved by deep learning-based reconstruction.

KEY POINTS

• 3D heavily T2-weighted FLAIR (3D hvT2F) is a sequence sensitive in detecting low concentrations of contrast in the perilymphatic space. • 3D hvT2F sequences properly demonstrated perilymphatic enhancement in sudden sensorineural hearing loss compared to T1 sequences and were further improved by deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR). • 3D hvT2F and DLR are efficacious sequences in detecting blood-labyrinthine barrier leakage and with potential prognostic information.

Comparison of model-based versus deep learning-based image reconstruction for thin-slice T2-weighted spin-echo prostate MRI

PURPOSE

To compare a previous model-based image reconstruction (MBIR) with a newly developed deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction for providing improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in high through-plane resolution (1 mm) T2-weighted spin-echo (T2SE) prostate MRI.

METHODS

Large-area contrast and high-contrast spatial resolution of the reconstruction methods were assessed quantitatively in experimental phantom studies. The methods were next evaluated radiologically in 17 subjects at 3.0 Tesla for whom prostate MRI was clinically indicated. For each subject, the axial T2SE raw data were directed to MBIR and to the DL reconstruction at three vendor-provided levels: (L)ow, (M)edium, and (H)igh. Thin-slice images from the four reconstructions were compared using evaluation criteria related to SNR, sharpness, contrast fidelity, and reviewer preference. Results were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test using Bonferroni correction, and inter-reader comparisons were done using the Cohen and Krippendorf tests.

RESULTS

Baseline contrast and resolution in phantom studies were equivalent for all four reconstruction pathways as desired. In vivo, all three DL levels (L, M, H) provided improved SNR versus MBIR. For virtually, all other evaluation criteria DL L and M were superior to MBIR. DL L and M were evaluated as superior to DL H in fidelity of contrast. For 44 of the 51 evaluations, the DL M reconstruction was preferred.

CONCLUSION

The deep learning reconstruction method provides significant SNR improvement in thin-slice (1 mm) T2SE images of the prostate while retaining image contrast. However, if taken to too high a level (DL High), both radiological sharpness and fidelity of contrast diminish.

Picture Perfect: The Status of Image Quality in Prostate MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard imaging modality for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). Image quality is a fundamental prerequisite for the ability to detect clinically significant disease. In this critical review, we separate the issue of image quality into quality improvement and quality assessment. Beginning with the evolution of technical recommendations for scan acquisition, we investigate the role of patient preparation, scanner factors, and more advanced sequences, including those featuring Artificial Intelligence (AI), in determining image quality. As means of quality appraisal, the published literature on scoring systems (including the Prostate Imaging Quality score), is evaluated. Finally, the application of AI and teaching courses as ways to facilitate quality assessment are discussed, encouraging the implementation of future image quality initiatives along the PCa diagnostic and monitoring pathway. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Deep learning denoising reconstruction enables faster T2-weighted FLAIR sequence acquisition with satisfactory image quality

INTRODUCTION

Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) technologies are the latest methods attempting to solve the enduring problem of reducing MRI acquisition times without compromising image quality. The clinical utility of this reconstruction technique is yet to be fully established. This study aims to assess whether a commercially available DLR technique applied to 2D T2-weighted FLAIR brain images allows a reduction in scan time, without compromising image quality and thus diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

47 participants (24 male, mean age 55.9 ± 18.7 SD years, range 20-89 years) underwent routine, clinically indicated brain MRI studies in March 2022, that included a standard-of-care (SOC) T2-weighted FLAIR sequence, and an accelerated acquisition that was reconstructed using the DLR denoising product. Overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and artefacts for each sequence, and preferred sequence on direct comparison, were subjectively assessed by two readers.

RESULTS

There was a strong preference for SOC FLAIR sequence for overall image quality (P = 0.01) and head-to-head comparison (P < 0.001). No difference was observed for lesion conspicuity (P = 0.49), perceived SNR (P = 1.0), and perceived CNR (P = 0.84). There was no difference in motion (P = 0.57) nor Gibbs ringing (P = 0.86) artefacts. Phase ghosting (P = 0.038) and pseudolesions were significantly more frequent (P < 0.001) on DLR images.

CONCLUSION

DLR algorithm allowed faster FLAIR acquisition times with comparable image quality and lesion conspicuity. However, an increased incidence and severity of phase ghosting artefact and presence of pseudolesions using this technique may result in a reduction in reading speed, efficiency, and diagnostic confidence.

Deep learning-based image reconstruction for the multi-arterial phase images: improvement of the image quality to assess the small hypervascular hepatic tumor on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI

PURPOSE

To evaluated the impact of a deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction on multi-arterial-phase magnetic resonance imaging (MA-MRI) for small hypervascular hepatic masses in patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 55 adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with small hepatic hypervascular mass (≤ 3 cm) between December 2022 and February 2023. All patients underwent MA-MRI, subsequently reconstructed with a DL-based application. Qualitative assessment with Linkert scale including motion artifact (MA), liver edge (LE), hepatic vessel clarity (HVC) and image quality (IQ) was performed. Quantitative image analysis including signal to noise ratio (SNR), contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and noise was performed.

RESULTS

On both arterial phases (APs), all qualitative parameters were significantly improved after DL-based image reconstruction. (LE on 1st AP, 1.22 vs 1.61; LE on 2nd AP, 1.21 vs 1.65; HVC on 1st AP, 1.24 vs 1.39; HVC on 2nd AP, 1.24 vs 1.44; IQ on 1st AP, 1.17 vs 1.45; IQ on 2nd AP, 1.17 vs 1.47, all p values < 0.05). The SNR, CNR and noise were significantly improved after DL-based image reconstruction. (SNR on AP1, 279.08 vs 176.14; SNR on AP2, 334.34 vs 199.24; CNR on AP1, 106.09 vs 64.14; CNR on AP2, 129.66 vs 73.73; noise on AP1, 1.51 vs 2.33; noise on AP2, 1.45 vs 2.28, all p values < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MA-MRI with DL-based image reconstruction improved the qualitative and quantitative parameters. Despite the short acquisition time, high-quality MA-MRI is now achievable.

Impact of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Methods on MRI Throughput

Purpose To evaluate the effect of implementing two distinct commercially available deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithms on the efficiency of MRI examinations conducted in real clinical practice within an outpatient setting at a large, multicenter institution. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 7346 examinations from 10 clinical MRI scanners analyzed during the pre- and postimplementation periods of DLR methods. Two different types of DLR methods, namely Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)-based and k-space-based methods, were implemented in half of the scanners (three DICOM-based and two k-space-based), while the remaining five scanners had no DLR method implemented. Scan and room times of each examination type during the pre- and postimplementation periods were compared among the different DLR methods using the Wilcoxon test. Results The application of deep learning methods resulted in significant reductions in scan and room times for certain examination types. The DICOM-based method demonstrated up to a 53% reduction in scan times and a 41% reduction in room times for various study types. The k-space-based method demonstrated up to a 27% reduction in scan times but did not significantly reduce room times. Conclusion DLR methods were associated with reductions in scan and room times in a clinical setting, though the effects were heterogeneous depending on examination type. Thus, potential adopters should carefully evaluate their case mix to determine the impact of integrating these tools. Keywords: Deep Learning MRI Reconstruction, Reconstruction Algorithms, DICOM-based Reconstruction, k-Space-based Reconstruction © RSNA, 2024 See also the commentary by GharehMohammadi in this issue.

Flow independent black blood imaging with a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch: A feasibility study at 3 tesla

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of obtaining black-blood imaging with a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch at 3 T using a newly modified Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering for Black-Blood Imaging (REACT-BB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

REACT-BB provides black-blood images by adjusting the inversion time (TI) in REACT to the null point of blood. The optimal TI for REACT-BB was investigated in 10 healthy volunteers with TI varied from 200 ms to 1400 ms. Contrast ratios were calculated between muscle and three branch arteries of the aortic arch. Additionally, a comparison between REACT-BB and MPRAGE involved evaluating the depiction of high-intensity plaques in 222 patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack. Measurements included plaque-to-muscle signal intensity ratios (PMR), plaque volumes, and carotid artery stenosis rates in 60 patients with high-intensity plaques in carotid arteries.

RESULTS

REACT-BB with TI = 850 ms produced the black-blood image with the best contrast between blood and background tissues. REACT-BB outperformed MPRAGE in depicting high-intensity plaques in the aortic arch (55.4% vs 45.5%) and exhibited superior overall image quality in visual assessment (3.31 ± 0.70 vs 2.89 ± 0.73; p < 0.05). Although the PMR of REACT-BB was significantly lower than MPRAGE (2.227 ± 0.601 vs 2.285 ± 0.662; P < 0.05), a strong positive correlation existed between REACT-BB and MPRAGE (ρ = 0.935; P < 0.05), and all high-intensity plaques that MPRAGE detected were clearly detected by REACT-BB.

CONCLUSION

REACT-BB provides black-blood images with uniformly suppressed fat and blood signals over a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch with comparable or better high-signal plaque depiction than MPRAGE.

Improving Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy With Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction in Patients With Suspected Focal Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance and image quality of 1.5-mm slice thickness MRI with deep learning-based image reconstruction (1.5-mm MRI + DLR) compared to routine 3-mm slice thickness MRI (routine MRI) and 1.5-mm slice thickness MRI without DLR (1.5-mm MRI without DLR) for evaluating temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 117 MR image sets comprising 1.5-mm MRI + DLR, 1.5-mm MRI without DLR, and routine MRI from 117 consecutive patients (mean age, 41 years; 61 female; 34 patients with TLE and 83 without TLE). Two neuroradiologists evaluated the presence of hippocampal or temporal lobe lesions, volume loss, signal abnormalities, loss of internal structure of the hippocampus, and lesion conspicuity in the temporal lobe. Reference standards for TLE were independently constructed by neurologists using clinical and radiological findings. Subjective image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were analyzed. Performance in diagnosing TLE, lesion findings, and image quality were compared among the three protocols.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR (91.2%) for diagnosing TLE was higher than that of routine MRI (72.1%, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, 1.5-mm MRI + DLR showed higher sensitivity for hippocampal lesions than routine MRI (92.7% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.001), with improved depiction of hippocampal T2 high signal intensity change (P = 0.016) and loss of internal structure (P < 0.001). However, the pooled specificity of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR (76.5%) was lower than that of routine MRI (89.2%, P = 0.004). Compared with 1.5-mm MRI without DLR, 1.5-mm MRI + DLR resulted in significantly improved pooled accuracy (91.2% vs. 73.1%, P = 0.010), image quality, SNR, and CNR (all, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The use of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR enhanced the performance of MRI in diagnosing TLE, particularly in hippocampal evaluation, because of improved depiction of hippocampal abnormalities and enhanced image quality.

Application of a deep learning algorithm for three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in patients at a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of a vendor-specific deep learning reconstruction algorithm (DLRA) in enhancing image quality and focal lesion detection using three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo images in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients at a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 83 high-risk patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI using a 3-T scanner. Triple arterial phase, high-resolution portal venous phase, and high-resolution hepatobiliary phase images were reconstructed using conventional reconstruction techniques and DLRA (AIRTM Recon DL; GE Healthcare) for subsequent comparison. Image quality and solid focal lesion detection were assessed by three abdominal radiologists and compared between conventional and DL methods. Focal liver lesion detection was evaluated using figures of merit (FOMs) from a jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis on a per-lesion basis.

RESULTS

DLRA-reconstructed images exhibited significantly improved overall image quality, image contrast, lesion conspicuity, vessel conspicuity, and liver edge sharpness and reduced subjective image noise, ringing artifacts, and motion artifacts compared to conventionally reconstructed images (all P < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the FOMs of non-cystic focal liver lesions between the conventional and DL methods, DLRA-reconstructed images showed notably higher pooled sensitivity than conventionally reconstructed images (P < 0.05) in all phases and higher detection rates for viable post-treatment HCCs in the arterial and hepatobiliary phases (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing DLRA can enhance the image quality in 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI examinations, leading to improved detection of viable post-treatment HCCs.

Deep learning denoising reconstruction for improved image quality in fetal cardiac cine MRI

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate deep learning (DL) denoising reconstructions for image quality improvement of Doppler ultrasound (DUS)-gated fetal cardiac MRI in congenital heart disease (CHD).

Methods

Twenty-five fetuses with CHD (mean gestational age: 35 ± 1 weeks) underwent fetal cardiac MRI at 3T. Cine imaging was acquired using a balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence with Doppler ultrasound gating. Images were reconstructed using both compressed sensing (bSSFP CS) and a pre-trained convolutional neural network trained for DL denoising (bSSFP DL). Images were compared qualitatively based on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = non-diagnostic to 5 = excellent) and quantitatively by calculating the apparent signal-to-noise ratio (aSNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (aCNR). Diagnostic confidence was assessed for the atria, ventricles, foramen ovale, valves, great vessels, aortic arch, and pulmonary veins.

Results

Fetal cardiac cine MRI was successful in 23 fetuses (92%), with two studies excluded due to extensive fetal motion. The image quality of bSSFP DL cine reconstructions was rated superior to standard bSSFP CS cine images in terms of contrast [3 (interquartile range: 2-4) vs. 5 (4-5), P < 0.001] and endocardial edge definition [3 (2-4) vs. 4 (4-5), P < 0.001], while the extent of artifacts was found to be comparable [4 (3-4.75) vs. 4 (3-4), P = 0.40]. bSSFP DL images had higher aSNR and aCNR compared with the bSSFP CS images (aSNR: 13.4 ± 6.9 vs. 8.3 ± 3.6, P < 0.001; aCNR: 26.6 ± 15.8 vs. 14.4 ± 6.8, P < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence of the bSSFP DL images was superior for the evaluation of cardiovascular structures (e.g., atria and ventricles: P = 0.003).

Conclusion

DL image denoising provides superior quality for DUS-gated fetal cardiac cine imaging of CHD compared to standard CS image reconstruction.

Evaluation of Extra-Prostatic Extension on Deep Learning-Reconstructed High-Resolution Thin-Slice T2-Weighted Images in Patients with Prostate Cancer

The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic performance for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) and image quality among three image datasets: conventional T2-weighted images (T2WIconv, slice thickness, 3 mm) and high-resolution thin-slice T2WI (T2WIHR, 2 mm), with and without deep learning reconstruction (DLR) in patients with prostatic cancer (PCa). A total of 88 consecutive patients (28 EPE-positive and 60 negative) diagnosed with PCa via radical prostatectomy who had undergone 3T-MRI were included. Two independent reviewers performed a crossover review in three sessions, in which each reviewer recorded five-point confidence scores for the presence of EPE and image quality using a five-point Likert scale. Pathologic topographic maps served as the reference standard. For both reviewers, T2WIconv showed better diagnostic performance than T2WIHR with and without DLR (AUCs, in order, for reviewer 1, 0.883, 0.806, and 0.772, p = 0.0006; for reviewer 2, 0.803, 0.762, and 0.745, p = 0.022). The image quality was also the best in T2WIconv, followed by T2WIHR with DLR and T2WIHR without DLR for both reviewers (median, in order, 3, 4, and 5, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, T2WIconv was optimal in regard to image quality and diagnostic performance for the evaluation of EPE in patients with PCa.

Impact of deep learning-based reconstruction and anti-peristaltic agent on the image quality and diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance enterography comparing single breath-hold single-shot fast spin echo with and without anti-peristaltic agent

Background

While anti-peristaltic agents are beneficial for high quality magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), their use is constrained by potential side effects and increased examination complexity. We explored the potential of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) to compensate for the absence of anti-peristaltic agent, improve image quality and reduce artifact. This study aimed to evaluate the need for an anti-peristaltic agent in single breath-hold single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) MRE and compare the image quality and artifacts between conventional reconstruction (CR) and DLR.

Methods

We included 45 patients who underwent MRE for Crohn's disease between October 2021 and September 2022. Coronal SSFSE images without fat saturation were acquired before and after anti-peristaltic agent administration. Four sets of data were generated: SSFSE CR with and without an anti-peristaltic agent (CR-A and CR-NA, respectively) and SSFSE DLR with and without an anti-peristaltic agent (DLR-A and DLR-NA, respectively). Two radiologists independently reviewed the images for overall quality and artifacts, and compared the three images with DLR-A. The degree of distension and inflammatory parameters were scored on a 5-point scale in the jejunum and ileum, respectively. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels were calculated in superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and iliac bifurcation level.

Results

In terms of overall quality, DLR-NA demonstrated no significant difference compared to DLR-A, whereas CR-NA and CR-A demonstrated significant differences (P<0.05, both readers). Regarding overall artifacts, reader 1 rated DLR-A slightly better than DLR-NA in four cases and rated them as identical in 41 cases (P=0.046), whereas reader 2 demonstrated no difference. Bowel distension was significantly different in the jejunum (Reader 1: P=0.046; Reader 2: P=0.008) but not in the ileum. Agreements between the images (Reader 1: ĸ=0.73-1.00; Reader 2: ĸ=1.00) and readers (ĸ=0.66 for all comparisons) on inflammation were considered good to excellent. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing inflammation in the terminal ileum were the same among DLR-NA, DLR-A, CR-NA and CR-A (94.42%, 81.83%, and 89.69 %; and 83.33%, 90.91%, and 86.21% for Readers 1 and 2, respectively). In both SMA and iliac bifurcation levels, SNR of DLR images exhibited no significant differences. CR images showed significantly lower SNR compared with DLR images (P<0.001).

Conclusions

SSFSE without anti-peristaltic agents demonstrated nearly equivalent quality to that with anti-peristaltic agents. Omitting anti-peristaltic agents before SSFSE and adding DLR could improve the scanning outcomes and reduce time.

Evaluation of a deep learning magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction method for synthetic computed tomography generation in prostate radiotherapy

Background and Purpose

In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) only radiotherapy computed tomography (CT) is excluded. The method relies entirely on synthetic CT images generated from MRI. This study evaluates the compatibility of a commercial synthetic CT (sCT) with an accelerated commercial deep learning reconstruction (DLR) in MRI-only prostate radiotherapy.

Materials and Methods

For a group of 24 patients (cohort 1) the effects of DLR were studied in isolation. MRI data were reconstructed conventionally and with DLR from identical k-space data, and sCTs were generated for both reconstructions. The sCT quality, Hounsfield Unit (HU) and dosimetric impact were investigated. In another group of 15 patients (cohort 2) effects on sCT generation using accelerated MRI acquisition (40 % time reduction) reconstructed with DLR were investigated.

Results

sCT images from both cohorts, generated from DLR MRI data, were of clinically expected image quality. The mean dose differences for targets and organs at risks in cohort 1 were <0.06 Gy, corresponding to a 0.1 % prescribed dose difference. Similar dose differences were observed in cohort 2. Gamma pass rates for cohort 1 were 100 % for criteria 3 %/3mm, 2 %/2mm and 1 %/1mm for all dose levels. Mean error and mean absolute error inside the body, between sCTs, averaged over all cohort 1 subjects, were -1.1 ± 0.6 [-2.4 0.2] and 2.9 ± 0.4 [2.3 3.9] HU, respectively.

Conclusions

DLR was suitable for sCT generation with clinically negligible differences in HU and calculated dose compared to the conventional MRI reconstruction method. For sCT generation DLR enables scan time reduction, without compromised sCT quality.

Quality of T2-weighted MRI re-acquisition versus deep learning GAN image reconstruction: A multi-reader study

PURPOSE

To evaluate CycleGAN's ability to enhance T2-weighted image (T2WI) quality.

METHOD

A CycleGAN algorithm was used to enhance T2WI quality. 96 patients (192 scans) were identified from patients who underwent multiple axial T2WI due to poor quality on the first attempt (RAD1) and improved quality on re-acquisition (RAD2). CycleGAN algorithm gave DL classifier scores (0-1) for quality quantification and produced enhanced versions of QI1 and QI2 from RAD1 and RAD2, respectively. A subset (n = 20 patients) was selected for a blinded, multi-reader study, where four radiologists rated T2WI on a scale of 1-4 for quality. The multi-reader study presented readers with 60 image pairs (RAD1 vs RAD2, RAD1 vs QI1, and RAD2 vs QI2), allowing for selecting sequence preferences and quantifying the quality changes.

RESULTS

The DL classifier correctly discerned 71.9 % of quality classes, with 90.6 % (96/106) as poor quality and 48.8 % (42/86) as diagnostic in original sequences (RAD1, RAD2). CycleGAN images (QI1, QI2) demonstrated quantitative improvements, with consistently higher DL classifier scores than original scans (p < 0.001). In the multi-reader analysis, CycleGAN demonstrated no qualitative improvements, with diminished overall quality and motion in QI2 in most patients compared to RAD2, with noise levels remaining similar (8/20). No readers preferred QI2 to RAD2 for diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Despite quantitative enhancements with CycleGAN, there was no qualitative boost in T2WI diagnostic quality, noise, or motion. Expert radiologists didn't favor CycleGAN images over standard scans, highlighting the divide between quantitative and qualitative metrics.

Update on Optimization of Prostate MR Imaging Technique and Image Quality

Prostate MR imaging quality has improved dramatically over recent times, driven by advances in hardware, software, and improved functional imaging techniques. MRI now plays a key role in prostate cancer diagnostic work-up, but outcomes of the MRI-directed pathway are heavily dependent on image quality and optimization. MR sequences can be affected by patient-related degradations relating to motion and susceptibility artifacts which may enable only partial mitigation. In this Review, we explore issues relating to prostate MRI acquisition and interpretation, mitigation strategies at a patient and scanner level, PI-QUAL reporting, and future directions in image quality, including artificial intelligence solutions.

Deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction for improving the image quality of reduced-field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging of the pancreas

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) can reduce image noise and artifacts, thereby improving the signal-to-noise ratio and image sharpness. However, no previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of DLR in improving image quality in reduced-field-of-view (reduced-FOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) [field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot (FOCUS)] of the pancreas. We hypothesized that a combination of these techniques would improve DWI image quality without prolonging the scan time but would influence the apparent diffusion coefficient calculation.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of DLR for image quality improvement of FOCUS of the pancreas.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study evaluated 37 patients with pancreatic cystic lesions who underwent magnetic resonance imaging between August 2021 and October 2021. We evaluated three types of FOCUS examinations: FOCUS with DLR (FOCUS-DLR+), FOCUS without DLR (FOCUS-DLR-), and conventional FOCUS (FOCUS-conv). The three types of FOCUS and their apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were compared qualitatively and quantitatively.

RESULTS

FOCUS-DLR+ (3.62, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than FOCUS-DLR- (2.62) and FOCUS-conv (2.88) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, FOCUS-DLR+ showed the highest contrast ratio (CR) between the pancreatic parenchyma and adjacent fat tissue for b-values of 0 and 600 s/mm2 (0.72 ± 0.08 and 0.68 ± 0.08) and FOCUS-DLR- showed the highest CR between cystic lesions and the pancreatic parenchyma for the b-values of 0 and 600 s/mm2 (0.62 ± 0.21 and 0.62 ± 0.21) (P < 0.05), respectively. FOCUS-DLR+ provided significantly higher ADCs of the pancreas and lesion (1.44 ± 0.24 and 3.00 ± 0.66) compared to FOCUS-DLR- (1.39 ± 0.22 and 2.86 ± 0.61) and significantly lower ADCs compared to FOCUS-conv (1.84 ± 0.45 and 3.32 ± 0.70) (P < 0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study evaluated the efficacy of DLR for image quality improvement in reduced-FOV DWI of the pancreas. DLR can significantly denoise images without prolonging the scan time or decreasing the spatial resolution. The denoising level of DWI can be controlled to make the images appear more natural to the human eye. However, this study revealed that DLR did not ameliorate pancreatic distortion. Additionally, physicians should pay attention to the interpretation of ADCs after DLR application because ADCs are significantly changed by DLR.

Deep learning-based reconstruction and 3D hybrid profile order technique for MRCP at 3T: evaluation of image quality and acquisition time

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the image quality of the 3D hybrid profile order technique and deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) within a single breath-hold (BH) at 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 32 patients with biliary and pancreatic disorders. BH images were reconstructed with and without DLR. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the common bile duct (CBD) and periductal tissues, and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of CBD on 3D-MRCP were evaluated quantitatively. Two radiologists scored image noise, contrast, artifacts, blur, and overall image quality of the three image types using a 4-point scale. Quantitative and qualitative scores were compared using the Friedman test and post hoc Nemenyi test.

RESULTS

The SNR and CNR were not significantly different when under respiratory gating- and BH-MRCP without DLR. However, they were significantly higher under BH with DLR than under respiratory gating (SNR, p = 0.013; CNR, p = 0.027). The contrast and FWHM of MRCP under BH with and without DLR were lower than those under respiratory gating (contrast, p < 0.001; FWHM, p = 0.015). Qualitative scores for noise, blur, and overall image quality were higher under BH with DLR than those under respiratory gating (blur, p = 0.003; overall, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the 3D hybrid profile order technique and DLR is useful for MRCP within a single BH and does not lead to the deterioration of image quality and space resolution at 3 T MRI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Considering its advantages, this sequence might become the standard protocol for MRCP in clinical practice, at least at 3.0 T.

KEY POINTS

• The 3D hybrid profile order can achieve MRCP within a single breath-hold without a decrease in spatial resolution. • The DLR significantly improved the CNR and SNR of BH-MRCP. • The 3D hybrid profile order technique with DLR reduces the deterioration of image quality in MRCP within a single breath-hold.

Clinical feasibility of deep learning reconstruction in liver diffusion-weighted imaging: Improvement of image quality and impact on apparent diffusion coefficient value

PURPOSE

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the liver suffers from low resolution, noise, and artifacts. This study aimed to investigate the effect of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification of liver DWI at 3 Tesla.

METHOD

In this prospective study, images of the liver obtained at DWI with b-values of 0 (DWI0), 50 (DWI50) and 800 s/mm2 (DWI800) from consecutive patients with liver lesions from February 2022 to February 2023 were reconstructed with and without DLR (non-DLR). Image quality was assessed qualitatively using Likert scoring system and quantitatively using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and liver/parenchyma boundary sharpness from region-of-interest (ROI) analysis. ADC value of lesion were measured. Phantom experiment was also performed to investigate the factors that determine the effect of DLR on ADC value. Qualitative score, SNR, CNR, boundary sharpness, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) for DWI were compared using paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients with 170 lesions were included. DLR group showed a higher qualitative score than the non-DLR group. for example, with DWI800 the score was 4.77 ± 0.52 versus 4.30 ± 0.63 (P < 0.001). DLR group also showed higher SNRs, CNRs and boundary sharpness than the non-DLR group. DLR reduced the ADC of malignant tumors (1.105[0.904, 1.340] versus 1.114[0.904, 1.320]) (P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the diagnostic value of malignancy for DLR and non-DLR groups (P = 57.3). The phantom study confirmed a reduction of ADC in images with low resolution, and a stronger reduction of ADC in heterogeneous structures than in homogeneous ones (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DLR improved image quality of liver DWI. DLR reduced the ADC value of lesions, but did not affect the diagnostic performance of ADC in distinguishing malignant tumors on a 3.0-T MRI system.

Evaluation of a Deep Learning Reconstruction for High-Quality T2-Weighted Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Deep learning (DL) reconstruction techniques to improve MR image quality are becoming commercially available with the hope that they will be applicable to multiple imaging application sites and acquisition protocols. However, before clinical implementation, these methods must be validated for specific use cases. In this work, the quality of standard-of-care (SOC) T2w and a high-spatial-resolution (HR) imaging of the breast were assessed both with and without prototype DL reconstruction. Studies were performed using data collected from phantoms, 20 retrospectively collected SOC patient exams, and 56 prospectively acquired SOC and HR patient exams. Image quality was quantitatively assessed via signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and edge sharpness. Qualitatively, all in vivo images were scored by either two or four radiologist readers using 5-point Likert scales in the following categories: artifacts, perceived sharpness, perceived SNR, and overall quality. Differences in reader scores were tested for significance. Reader preference and perception of signal intensity changes were also assessed. Application of the DL resulted in higher average SNR (1.2-2.8 times), CNR (1.0-1.8 times), and image sharpness (1.2-1.7 times). Qualitatively, the SOC acquisition with DL resulted in significantly improved image quality scores in all categories compared to non-DL images. HR acquisition with DL significantly increased SNR, sharpness, and overall quality compared to both the non-DL SOC and the non-DL HR images. The acquisition time for the HR data only required a 20% increase compared to the SOC acquisition and readers typically preferred DL images over non-DL counterparts. Overall, the DL reconstruction demonstrated improved T2w image quality in clinical breast MRI.

Assessment of deep learning-based reconstruction on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted prostate MRI image quality

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of a commercially available deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) algorithm with varying combinations of DLR noise reduction settings and imaging parameters on quantitative and qualitative image quality, PI-RADS classification and examination time in prostate T2-weighted (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) imaging.

METHOD

Forty patients were included. Standard-of-care (SoC) prostate MRI sequences including T2WI and DWI were reconstructed without and with different DLR de-noising levels (low, medium, high). In addition, faster T2WI(Fast) and DWI(Fast) sequences, and a higher resolution T2WI(HR) sequence were evaluated. Quantitative analysis included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Two radiologists performed qualitative analysis, independently evaluating imaging datasets using 5-point scoring scales for image quality and artifacts. PI-RADS category assignment was also performed by the more experienced radiologist.

RESULTS

All DLR levels resulted in significantly higher SNR and CNR compared to the DLR(off) acquisitions. DLR allowed the acquisition time to be reduced by 33% for T2WI(Fast) and 49% for DWI(Fast) compared to SoC, without affecting image quality, whilst T2WI(HR) with DLR allowed for a 73% increase in spatial resolution in the phase encode direction compared to SoC. The inter-reader agreement for image quality and artifact scores was substantial for all subjective measurements on T2WI and DWI. The T2WI(Fast) protocol with DLR(medium) and DWI(Fast) with DLR(low) received the highest qualitative quality score.

CONCLUSION

DLR can reduce T2WI and DWI acquisition time and increase SNR and CNR without compromising image quality or altering PI-RADS classification.

Trends in MR Arthrogram Utilization at a Tertiary Care Academic Center

The purpose is to evaluate the trends in MR arthrogram utilization at a tertiary care academic institution and to determine if there are factors that can be implicated in the utilization trends. Number of MR arthrograms of the shoulder, hip, and elbow from 2013-2020 at our institution were identified (n = 1882). Patient demographics including age, sex, sports participation, history of prior surgery, and physician referral were obtained. Descriptive statistics were performed to determine the prevalence of MR arthrograms. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship of time with prevalence of arthrograms. Chi-square tests and posthoc analyses with Bonferroni correction were used to assess if categorical variables were different between the years. There was overall decrease in the prevalence of MR arthrograms of the shoulder, hip, and elbow despite an increase in the overall MR volume during the study period. Linear regression models significantly predicated decrease in arthrogram prevalence with each passing year (P < 0.001). The percentage of orthopedic referrals for arthrograms in the hip (P = 0.002) and shoulder (P = < 0.001) decreased significantly towards the end of the study period. None of the other variables assessed were significant. At our tertiary care academic institution, arthrogram utilization has been drastically decreasing over the past 8 years. The percentage of orthopedic referrals for shoulder and hip arthrograms significantly decreased at the end of the study period.

A Feasibility Study on Deep Learning Reconstruction to Improve Image Quality With PROPELLER Acquisition in the Setting of T2-Weighted Gynecologic Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate deep learning (DL) to improve the image quality of the PROPELLER (Periodically Rotated Overlapping Parallel Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction technique) for 3 T magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis.

METHODS

Three radiologists prospectively and independently compared non-DL and DL PROPELLER sequences from 20 patients with a history of gynecologic malignancy. Sequences with different noise reduction factors (DL 25%, DL 50%, and DL 75%) were blindly reviewed and scored based on artifacts, noise, relative sharpness, and overall image quality. The generalized estimating equation method was used to assess the effect of methods on the Likert scales. Quantitatively, the contrast-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the iliac muscle were calculated, and pairwise comparisons were performed based on a linear mixed model. P values were adjusted using the Dunnett method. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the κ statistic. P value was considered statistically significant at less than 0.05.

RESULTS

Qualitatively, DL 50 and DL 75 were ranked as the best sequences in 86% of cases. Images generated by the DL method were significantly better than non-DL images ( P < 0.0001). Iliacus muscle SNR on DL 50 and DL 75 was significantly better than non-DL images ( P < 0.0001). There was no difference in contrast-to-noise ratio between the DL and non-DL techniques in the iliac muscle. There was a high percent agreement (97.1%) in terms of DL sequences' superior image quality (97.1%) and sharpness (100%) relative to non-DL images.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of DL reconstruction improves the image quality of PROPELLER sequences with improved SNR quantitatively.

Prostate MRI and image Quality: It is time to take stock

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) plays a vital role in prostate cancer diagnosis and management. With the increase in use of mpMRI, obtaining the best possible quality images has become a priority. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) was introduced to standardize and optimize patient preparation, scanning techniques, and interpretation. However, the quality of the MRI sequences depends not only on the hardware/software and scanning parameters, but also on patient-related factors. Common patient-related factors include bowel peristalsis, rectal distension, and patient motion. There is currently no consensus regarding the best approaches to address these issues and improve the quality of mpMRI. New evidence has been accrued since the release of PI-RADS, and this review aims to explore the key strategies which aim to improve prostate MRI quality, such as imaging techniques, patient preparation methods, the new Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) criteria, and artificial intelligence on prostate MRI quality.

Update on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Hepatobiliary MR Imaging

The application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) in radiology has expanded exponentially. In recent years, an extremely large number of studies have reported about the hepatobiliary domain. Its applications range from differential diagnosis to the diagnosis of tumor invasion and prediction of treatment response and prognosis. Moreover, it has been utilized to improve the image quality of DL reconstruction. However, most clinicians are not familiar with ML and DL, and previous studies about these concepts are relatively challenging to understand. In this review article, we aimed to explain the concepts behind ML and DL and to summarize recent achievements in their use in the hepatobiliary region.

Deep learning-based imaging reconstruction for MRI after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: effects on image quality and assessment of treatment response

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of deep learning-based imaging reconstruction (DLR) on the image quality of MRI of rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and its accuracy in diagnosing pathological complete responses (pCR).

METHODS

We included 39 patients (men: women, 21:18; mean age ± standard deviation, 59.1 ± 9.7 years) with mid-to-lower rectal cancer who underwent a long-course of CRT and high-resolution rectal MRIs between January 2020 and April 2021. Axial T2WI was reconstructed using the conventional method (MRI_conv) and DLR with two different noise reduction factors (MRI_DLR30 and MRI_DLR50). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the tumor was measured. Two experienced radiologists independently made a blind assessment of the complete response on MRI. The sensitivity and specificity for pCR were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients did not have a pCR whereas five (12.8%) had pCR. Compared with the SNR of MRI_conv (mean ± SD, 7.94 ± 1.92), MRI_DLR30 and MRI_DLR50 showed higher SNR (9.44 ± 2.31 and 11.83 ± 3.07, respectively) (p < 0.001). Compared to MRI_conv, MRI_DLR30 and MRI_DLR50 showed significantly higher specificity values (p < 0.036) while the sensitivity values were not significantly different (p > 0.301). The sensitivity and specificity for pCR were 48.9% and 80.8% for MRI_conv; 48.9% and 88.2% for MRI_DLR30; and 38.8% and 86.7% for MRI_DLR50, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DLR produced MR images with higher resolution and SNR. The specificity of MRI for identification of pCR was significantly higher with DLR than with conventional MRI.

Deep learning reconstruction in pediatric brain MRI: comparison of image quality with conventional T2-weighted MRI

INTRODUCTION

Deep learning-based MRI reconstruction has recently been introduced to improve image quality. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of deep learning reconstruction in pediatric brain MRI.

METHODS

A total of 107 consecutive children who underwent 3.0 T brain MRI were included in this study. T2-weighted brain MRI was reconstructed using the three different reconstruction modes: deep learning reconstruction, conventional reconstruction with an intensity filter, and original T2 image without a filter. Two pediatric radiologists independently evaluated the following image quality parameters of three reconstructed images on a 5-point scale: overall image quality, image noisiness, sharpness of gray-white matter differentiation, truncation artifact, motion artifact, cerebrospinal fluid and vascular pulsation artifacts, and lesion conspicuity. The subjective image quality parameters were compared among the three reconstruction modes. Quantitative analysis of the signal uniformity using the coefficient of variation was performed for each reconstruction.

RESULTS

The overall image quality, noisiness, and gray-white matter sharpness were significantly better with deep learning reconstruction than with conventional or original reconstruction (all P < 0.001). Deep learning reconstruction had significantly fewer truncation artifacts than the other two reconstructions (all P < 0.001). Motion and pulsation artifacts showed no significant differences among the three reconstruction modes. For 36 lesions in 107 patients, lesion conspicuity was better with deep learning reconstruction than original reconstruction. Deep learning reconstruction showed lower signal variation compared to conventional and original reconstructions.

CONCLUSION

Deep learning reconstruction can reduce noise and truncation artifacts and improve lesion conspicuity and overall image quality in pediatric T2-weighted brain MRI.

Artificial intelligence based image quality enhancement in liver MRI: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation

Purpose

To compare liver MRI with AIR Recon Deep Learning™(ARDL) algorithm applied and turned-off (NON-DL) with conventional high-resolution acquisition (NAÏVE) sequences, in terms of quantitative and qualitative image analysis and scanning time.

Material and methods

This prospective study included fifty consecutive volunteers (31 female, mean age 55.5 ± 20 years) from September to November 2021. 1.5 T MRI was performed and included three sets of images: axial single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) T2 images, diffusion-weighted images(DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) maps acquired with both ARDL and NAÏVE protocol; the NON-DL images, were also assessed. Two radiologists in consensus drew fixed regions of interest in liver parenchyma to calculate signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and contrast to-noise-ratio (CNR). Subjective image quality was assessed by two other radiologists independently with a five-point Likert scale. Acquisition time was recorded.

Results

SSFSE T2 objective analysis showed higher SNR and CNR for ARDL vs NAÏVE, ARDL vs NON-DL(all P < 0.013). Regarding DWI, no differences were found for SNR with ARDL vs NAÏVE and, ARDL vs NON-DL (all P > 0.2517).CNR was higher for ARDL vs NON-DL(P = 0.0170), whereas no differences were found between ARDL and NAÏVE(P = 1). No differences were observed for all three comparisons, in terms of SNR and CNR, for ADC maps (all P > 0.32).

Qualitative analysis for all sequences showed better overall image quality for ARDL with lower truncation artifacts, higher sharpness and contrast (all P < 0.0070) with excellent inter-rater agreement (k ≥ 0.8143). Acquisition time was lower in ARDL sequences compared to NAÏVE (SSFSE T2 = 19.08 ± 2.5 s vs. 24.1 ± 2 s and DWI = 207.3 ± 54 s vs. 513.6 ± 98.6 s, all P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

ARDL applied on upper abdomen showed overall better image quality and reduced scanning time compared with NAÏVE protocol.

Impact of Deep Learning Reconstruction Combined With a Sharpening Filter on Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Uterus

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of deep learning (DL) reconstruction and a postprocessing sharpening filter on the image quality of single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) of the uterus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients who underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging were included. Parasagittal T2WI with a slice thickness of 4 mm was obtained with the periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) and SSFSE sequences (mean scan time, 204 and 22 seconds, respectively). The following 3 types of SSFSE images were reconstructed, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and tissue contrast were assessed: conventional reconstruction (SSFSE-C), DL reconstruction (SSFSE-DL), and DL with a sharpening filter (SSFSE-DLF). Three radiologists independently assessed image quality, and area under the visual grading characteristics curve (AUCVGC) analysis was performed to compare the SSFSE and PROPELLER images.

RESULTS

Compared with that of the PROPELLER images, the SNR of the SSFSE-C, SSFSE-DL, and SSFSE-DLF images was significantly lower (P < 0.05), significantly higher (P < 0.05), and equivalent, respectively. The SSFSE-DL images exhibited significantly lower contrast between the junctional zone and myometrium than those obtained with the other sequences (P < 0.05). In qualitative comparisons with the PROPELLER images, all 3 SSFSE sequences, SSFSE-DL, and SSFSE-DLF demonstrated significantly higher scores for artifacts, noise, and sharpness, respectively (P < 0.01). The overall image quality of SSFSE-C (mean AUCVGC, 0.03; P < 0.01) and SSFSE-DL (mean AUCVGC, 0.23; P < 0.01) was rated as significantly inferior, whereas that of SSFSE-DLF (mean AUCVGC, 0.69) was equivalent or significantly higher (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Using a combination of DL and a sharpening filter markedly increases the image quality of SSFSE of the uterus to the level of the PROPELLER sequence.

Deep Learning Applications in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Has the Future Become Present?

Deep learning technologies and applications demonstrate one of the most important upcoming developments in radiology. The impact and influence of these technologies on image acquisition and reporting might change daily clinical practice. The aim of this review was to present current deep learning technologies, with a focus on magnetic resonance image reconstruction. The first part of this manuscript concentrates on the basic technical principles that are necessary for deep learning image reconstruction. The second part highlights the translation of these techniques into clinical practice. The third part outlines the different aspects of image reconstruction techniques, and presents a review of the current literature regarding image reconstruction and image post-processing in MRI. The promising results of the most recent studies indicate that deep learning will be a major player in radiology in the upcoming years. Apart from decision and diagnosis support, the major advantages of deep learning magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction techniques are related to acquisition time reduction and the improvement of image quality. The implementation of these techniques may be the solution for the alleviation of limited scanner availability via workflow acceleration. It can be assumed that this disruptive technology will change daily routines and workflows permanently.

Feasibility of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in ischemic cardiomyopathy using 2D-multisegment LGE combined with artificial intelligence reconstruction deep learning noise reduction algorithm

BACKGROUND

Despite the low spatial resolution of 2D-multisegment late gadolinium enhancement (2D-MSLGE) sequences, it may be useful in uncooperative patients instead of standard 2D single segmented inversion recovery gradient echo late gadolinium enhancement sequences (2D-SSLGE). The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility and comparison of 2D-MSLGE reconstructed with artificial intelligence reconstruction deep learning noise reduction (NR) algorithm compared to standard 2D-SSLGE in consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM).

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with known ICM referred for a clinically indicated CMR were enrolled in this study. 2D-MSLGE were reconstructed using a growing level of NR (0%,25%,50%,75%and 100%). Subjective image quality, signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated in each dataset and compared to standard 2D-SSLGE. Moreover, diagnostic accuracy, LGE mass and scan time were compared between 2D-MSLGE with NR and 2D-SSLGE.

RESULTS

The application of NR reconstruction ≥50% to 2D-MSLGE provided better subjective image quality, CNR and SNR compared to 2D-SSLGE (p < 0.01). The best compromise in terms of subjective and objective image quality was observed for values of 2D-MSLGE 75%, while no differences were found in terms of LGE quantification between 2D-MSLGE versus 2D-SSLGE, regardless the NR applied. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy of 2D-MSLGE NR 75% were 87.77%,96.27%,96.13%,88.16% and 94.22%, respectively. Time of acquisition of 2D-MSLGE was significantly shorter compared to 2D-SSLGE (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

When compared to standard 2D-SSLGE, the application of NR reconstruction to 2D-MSLGE provides superior image quality with similar diagnostic accuracy.

Fast T2-Weighted Imaging With Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction: Evaluation of Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) can potentially improve image quality by reduction of noise, thereby enabling fast acquisition of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, a systematic evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance of MRI using short acquisition time with DLR has rarely been investigated in men with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE

To assess the image quality and diagnostic performance of MRI using short acquisition time with DLR for the evaluation of extraprostatic extension (EPE).

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

One hundred and nine men.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3 T; turbo spin echo T2-weighted images (T2WI), echo-planar diffusion-weighted, and spoiled gradient echo dynamic contrast-enhanced images.

ASSESSMENT

To compare image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and subjective analysis using Likert scales on three T2WIs (MRI using conventional acquisition time, MRI using short acquisition time [fast MRI], and fast MRI with DLR) were performed. The diagnostic performance for EPE was evaluated by three independent readers.

STATISTICAL TESTS

SNR, CNR, and image quality scores across the three imaging protocols were compared using Friedman tests. The diagnostic performance for EPE was assessed using the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Fast MRI with DLR demonstrated significantly higher SNR (mean ± SD, 14.7 ± 6.8 vs. 8.8 ± 4.9) and CNR (mean ± SD, 6.5 ± 6.3 vs. 3.4 ± 3.6) values and higher image quality scores (median, 4.0 vs. 3.0 for three readers) than fast MRI. The AUCs for EPE were significantly higher with the use of DLR (0.86 vs. 0.75 for reader 2 and 0.82 vs. 0.73 for reader 3) compared with fast MRI, whereas differences were not significant for reader 1 (0.81 vs. 0.74; P = 0.09).

DATA CONCLUSION

DLR may be useful in reducing the acquisition time of prostate MRI without compromising image quality or diagnostic performance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Deep learning-accelerated T2-weighted imaging of the prostate: Impact of further acceleration with lower spatial resolution on image quality

PURPOSE

To compare image quality in prostate MRI among standard T2-weighted imaging (T2-std), accelerated T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) with high resolution (T2-HR) and more accelerated T2WI with lower resolution (T2-LR) using both conventional reconstruction (C) and deep learning reconstruction (DL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 46 consecutive patients, T2-std, T2-HR and T2-LR were acquired in 3:32 min, 1:06 min and 0.52 min, respectively. Both reconstruction techniques (C and DL) were applied to T2-HR and T2-LR. Five sets of images (T2-std, T2-HR_C, T2-LR_C, T2-HR_DL, and T2-LR_DL) for each patient were independently evaluated by two radiologists. Quantitative analysis including the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast ratio (CR) and qualitative analysis with a 5-point scale for the sharpness of structures, ghosting or other artifacts, noise and overall image quality were performed.

RESULTS

The SNR was not different in either the peripheral zone (PZ) or transition zone (TZ) between T2-LR_DL and T2-std with the median value of 21.7 versus 22.6 in PZ and 16.5 versus 17.3 in TZ, respectively. The CR between the prostate gland and muscle was significantly lower on T2-HR_C and T2-LR_C than on T2-std. Most of the evaluated factors showed significantly lower scores on T2-HR_C and T2-LR_C than on T2-std. Although noise and overall image quality on T2-HR_DL and other artifacts on T2-LR_DL were rated significantly lower than on T2-std (median value 4.0 versus 4.5, P < 0.001; 4.5 versus 5.0, P = 0.001; 4.5 versus 5.0, P = 0.006, respectively), other factors did not differ between T2-std and T2-HR_DL or T2-LR_DL.

CONCLUSION

DL is useful to improve image quality in accelerated T2WI of the prostate gland. Using DL, accelerated T2WI with lower spatial resolution than T2-std can be achieved with similar image quality in much shorter scan time (75.5% reduction in the acquisition time).

Accelerated T2-Weighted TSE Imaging of the Prostate Using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparison with Standard T2-Weighted TSE Imaging

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate has become the standard of care in prostate cancer evaluation. Recently, deep learning image reconstruction (DLR) methods have been introduced with promising results regarding scan acceleration. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of deep learning image reconstruction (DLR) in a shortened acquisition process of T2-weighted TSE imaging, regarding the image quality and diagnostic confidence, as well as PI-RADS and T2 scoring, as compared to standard T2 TSE imaging. Sixty patients undergoing 3T mpMRI for the evaluation of prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled in this institutional review board-approved study between October 2020 and March 2021. After the acquisition of standard T2 TSE imaging (T2_S), the novel T2 TSE sequence with DLR (T2_DLR) was applied in three planes. Overall, the acquisition time for T2_S resulted in 10:21 min versus 3:50 min for T2_DLR. The image evaluation was performed by two radiologists independently using a Likert scale ranging from 1-4 (4 best) applying the following criteria: noise levels, artifacts, overall image quality, diagnostic confidence, and lesion conspicuity. Additionally, T2 and PI-RADS scoring were performed. The mean patient age was 69 ± 9 years (range, 49-85 years). The noise levels and the extent of the artifacts were evaluated to be significantly improved in T2_DLR versus T2_S by both readers (p < 0.05). Overall image quality was also evaluated to be superior in T2_DLR versus T2_S in all three acquisition planes (p = 0.005-<0.001). Both readers evaluated the item lesion conspicuity to be superior in T2_DLR with a median of 4 versus a median of 3 in T2_S (p = 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). T2-weighted TSE imaging of the prostate in three planes with an acquisition time reduction of more than 60% including DLR is feasible with a significant improvement of image quality.