Treatment response assessment following transarterial radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Clinical consensus statement: Establishing the roles of locoregional and systemic therapies for the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in Canada

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide and approximately one-third of patients present with intermediate-stage disease. The treatment landscape of intermediate-stage HCC is rapidly evolving due to developments in local, locoregional and systemic therapies. Treatment recommendations focused on this heterogenous disease stage and that take into account the Canadian reality are lacking. To address this gap, a pan-Canadian group of experts in hepatology, transplant, surgery, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, interventional radiology, and medical oncology came together to develop consensus recommendations on management of intermediate-stage HCC relevant to the Canadian context.

METHODS

A modified Delphi framework was used to develop consensus statements with strengths of recommendation and supporting levels of evidence graded using the AHA/ACC classification system. Tentative consensus statements were drafted based on a systematic search and expert input in a series of iterative feedback cycles and were then circulated via online survey to assess the level of agreement.

RESULTS & CONCLUSION

The pre-defined ratification threshold of 80 % agreement was reached for all statements in the areas of multidisciplinary treatment (n = 4), intra-arterial therapy (n = 14), biologics (n = 5), radiation therapy (n = 3), surgical resection and transplantation (n = 7), and percutaneous ablative therapy (n = 4). These generally reflected an expansion in treatment options due to developments in previously established or emergent techniques, introduction of new and more active therapies and increased therapeutic flexibility. These developments have allowed for greater treatment tailoring and personalization as well as a paradigm shift toward strategies with curative intent in a wider range of disease settings.

Role of interventional oncology in hepatocellular carcinoma: Future best practice beyond current guidelines

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Liver transplant remains the goal of curative treatment, but limited supply of organs decreases accessibility and prolongs waiting time to transplantation. Therefore, interventional oncology therapies have been used to treat the majority of HCC patients, including those awaiting transplant. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification is the most widely used staging system in management of HCC that helps allocate treatments. Since its inception in 1999, it was updated for the fifth time in November 2021 and for the first time shaped by expert opinions outside the core BCLC group. The most recent version includes additional options for early-stage disease, substratifies intermediate disease into three groups, and lists alternates to Sorafenib that can double the expected survival of advanced-stage disease. The group also proposed a new BCLC staging schema for disease progression, and endorsed treatment stage migration (TSM) directly into the main staging and treatment algorithm. This article reviews the recent developments underlying the current BCLC guidelines and highlights ongoing research, particularly involving radioembolization, that will shape future best practice.

Utility of Early Posttreatment PET/CT Evaluation Using FDG or 18F-FCH to Predict Response to 90Y Radioembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: Assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment response after transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is challenging, as response by conventional imaging criteria may not become apparent until 6 months after treatment. Though HCC exhibits variability avidity for FDG, some cases of HCC without avidity for FDG show avidity for 18F-FCH. Objectives: To evaluate the utility of early posttreatment evaluation by PET/CT using FDG or 18F-FCH to predict 6-month treatment response and survival after TARE in patients with HCC. Methods: This retrospective study included 37 patients (mean age 67 years; 34 men, 3 women) with documented HCC treated by TARE who underwent both pretreatment FDG PET/CT and 18F-FCH PET/CT, as well as early FDG PET/CT and/or 18F-FCH PET/CT 4-8 weeks after treatment; FDG PET/CT and 18F-FCH PET/CT examinations were performed on separate dates. Only one of 73 initially identified potentially eligible patients was excluded due to lack of HCC avidity for both FDG and 18F-FCH. Response assessment by mRECIST on multiphase CT or MRI was performed at one-month and six-months in 23 patients. Early PET/CT response and one-month mRECIST response were assessed as predictors of six-month mRECIST response. Univariable and multivariable predictors of overall survival (OS) were identified. Results: On pretreatment PET/CT, 28 (76%) patients were FDG-positive, 15 (41%) FCH-positive 6 (16%) both FDG-positive and FCH-positive. Twelve of 28 FDG-positive HCCs exhibited early response by FDG PET/CT; 7 of 15 FCH-positive HCCs exhibited early response by 18F-FCH PET/CT. Twelve (52%) patients exhibited six-month mRECIST response. Early posttreatment PET/CT response exhibited 100% (12/12) sensitivity and 100% (11/11) specificity for six-month mRECIST response, whereas one-month mRECIST response exhibited 67% (8/12) sensitivity and 100% (11/11) specificity for six-month mRECIST response. Early postteatment PET/CT response was a significant independent predictor of OS on univariable (hazard ratio: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.93, p=.03) and multivariable analyses (hazard ratio: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08-0.76, p=.01). Conclusion: Early post-TARE evaluation by PET/CT using FDG or 18F-FCH may predict six-month response and OS in patients with HCC. Clinical Impact: Early posttreatment evaluation with PET/CT could help more reliably identify true nonresponders after TARE, which in turn could prompt early adapted therapeutic management.