Two-dimensional (2D) morphologic measurements can quantify the severity of liver disease in children with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD)

MR and Ultrasound Elastography for Fibrosis Assessment in Children: Practical Implementation and Supporting Evidence-AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Quantitative MRI and ultrasound biomarkers of liver fibrosis have become important tools in the diagnosis and clinical management of children with chronic liver disease (CLD). In particular, MR elastography (MRE) is now routinely performed in clinical practice to evaluate the liver for fibrosis. Ultrasound shear-wave elastography has also become widely performed for this purpose, especially in young children. These noninvasive methods are increasingly used to replace liver biopsy for the diagnosis, quantitative staging, and treatment monitoring of patients with CLD. Although ultrasound has advantages of portability and lower equipment cost, available evidence indicates that MRI may have greater reliability and accuracy in liver fibrosis evaluation. In this AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review, we describe how, why, and when to use MRI- and ultrasound-based elastography methods for liver fibrosis assessment in children. Practical approaches are discussed for adapting and optimizing these methods in children, with consideration of clinical indications, patient preparation, equipment requirements, acquisition technique, as well as pitfalls and confounding factors. Guidance is provided for interpretation and reporting, and representative case examples are presented.

Liver and spleen volume and stiffness in patients post-Fontan procedure and patients with ARPKD compared to normal controls

PURPOSE

Both congestive (patients post-Fontan hepatopathy) and congenital (patients with ARPKD) disease can lead to hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension with eventual development of splenomegaly. We investigated liver and spleen stiffness as measured by MRE between post-Fontan, ARPKD patients and controls independent of organ volume.

METHODS

Our study included 122 subjects (70 Fontan patients, 14 ARPKD patients, and 38 controls). The mean MRE liver and spleen stiffness values of Fontan patients and patients with ARPKD were compared to controls. Similarly, the liver and spleen volumes of the Fontan patients and patients with ARPKD were then compared to the volumes of controls.

RESULTS

Post-Fontan and ARPKD patients, mean liver stiffness, mean liver volume as well as mean spleen stiffness and mean spleen volume were higher than mean liver stiffness, mean liver volume, mean spleen stiffness, and mean spleen volume of controls. While liver stiffness correlated to liver volume in controls, we found no correlation between stiffness and volume in either Fontan or ARPKD patients, which indicates MRE's ability to act as an independent biomarker. However, these findings are not true in the spleen, where there is significant association between volume and stiffness in patients with ARPKD, but not in Fontan patients or controls.

CONCLUSION

Liver and spleen stiffness and volumes are significantly different among Fontan patients, ARPKD patients, and controls. Our findings suggest that beyond diagnosing fibrosis, MRE cut-off values could be disease-specific since not only the severity but the underlying pathology causing organ congestion or fibrosis influences MRE results.