Use of lumason/sonovue in contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidney for characterization of renal masses-a meta-analysis

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of renal masses in the pre-transplant setting: literature review with case highlights

With the rising incidence of chronic kidney disease worldwide, an increasing number of patients are expected to require renal transplantation, which remains the definitive treatment of end stage renal disease. Medical imaging, primarily ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI, plays a large role in pre-transplantation assessment, especially in the characterization of lesions within the native kidneys. However, patients with CKD/ESRD often have relative contraindications to CT- and MR-contrast agents, limiting their utilization within this patient population. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), which combines the high temporal and spatial resolution of ultrasonography with intravascular microbubble contrast agents, provides a promising alternative. This review aims to familiarize the reader with the literature regarding the use of CEUS in the evaluation of cystic and solid renal lesions and provide case examples of its use at our institution in the pre-transplant setting.

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Small Renal Masses After CT/MRI

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in characterizing small renal masses (SRMs) measuring less than 3 cm and in distinguishing between malignant and benign SRMs. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2022 and January 2023 at the Radiology Department of (Anonymized data), with a total of 43 patients assessed via CT and MRI scans, which were subsequently studied by experienced radiologists who were blinded to the pathology results. The CEUS findings were then compared with histopathological examination outcomes or follow-up imaging results. Results: The study results revealed a notably high level of diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity at 0.875, specificity at 0.94, positive predictive value at 0.95, and negative predictive value at 0.86 for characterizing SRMs. Spearman rank correlation analysis substantiated a robust positive linear correlation between the CEUS findings and biopsy results (r = 0.972). Conclusions: These findings underscore the potential utility of CEUS as a valuable tool for discriminating between malignant and benign SRMs, carrying significant implications for clinical decision-making and leading to improved patient outcomes. However, larger validation studies are imperative to establish its role in routine clinical practice and to address potential limitations.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage is a safe and effective procedure for patients with malignant biliary obstruction and stage 3 chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (CEUS-PTCD) as a biliary drainage procedure in patients with malignant biliary obstruction and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD3).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2019 and December 2023, 634 patients who underwent CEUS-PTCD were retrospectively enrolled in this study. During the procedure, imaging parameters such as the maximum diameter of the dilated bile duct, presence of ascites, detailed findings from CEUS, and clinical outcomes were meticulously recorded. Laboratory results, including serum bilirubin levels, liver function tests, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), were evaluated in one day before and three days after procedure. The aforementioned parameters were compared using the paired-sample t test and the Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

A total of 66 (10.41 %) patients with malignant biliary obstruction and CKD3 were included in the final analysis (median age: 66, range: 30-89 years, 46 males and 20 females). Procedure records indicated that 23 patients (34.8 %) had a maximum biliary duct dilation diameter of ≤ 4 mm, while 5 patients (7.6 %) exhibited mild ascites. Additionally, 24 patients (36.4 %) had ultrasound contrast agent entry into both the biliary duct and bloodstream. All patients successfully achieved external bile drainage following CEUS-PTCD, with no significant complications observed during or after the intervention. Post-procedure, there was a statistically significant reduction in all previously elevated serum bilirubin and liver enzyme levels (P-values were less than 0.05). Furthermore, no statistically significant alterations in eGFR were observed prior to or following CEUS-PTCD across all patients (P = 0.295), including comparisons between groups with and without the ultrasound contrast agent into the bloodstream (P = 0.254).

CONCLUSION

CEUS-PTCD is a safe and effective biliary drainage procedure for patients with malignant biliary obstruction and CKD3.

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) represents a rare form of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the clinic. It is now understood that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) exhibits diverse manifestations and can be prone to misdiagnosis. Therefore, summarizing the distinctive features of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is essential for differentiation from ccRCC.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of qualitative and quantitative CEUS in diagnosing nccRCC to enhance our understanding of this condition.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 21 patients with confirmed nccRCC following surgery and assessed the characteristic conventional ultrasound and CEUS imaging features. The paired Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was employed to compare differences in CEUS time-intensity curve (TIC) parameters between the lesions and the normal renal cortex.

RESULTS

Routine ultrasound revealed the following primary characteristics in the 21 nccRCC cases: hypoechoic appearance (10/21, 47.6%), absence of liquefaction (18/21, 66.7%), regular shape (19/21, 90.5%), clear boundaries (21/21, 100%), and absence of calcification (17/21, 81%). Color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) indicated a low blood flow signal (only 1 case of grade III). Qualitative CEUS analysis demonstrated that nccRCC predominantly exhibited slow progression (76.1%), fast washout (57%), uniformity (61.9%), low enhancement (71.5%), and ring enhancement (61.9%). Quantitative CEUS analysis revealed that parameters such as PE, WiAUC, mTTI, WiR, WiPI, WoAUC, WiWoAUC, and WOR in the lesions were significantly lower than those in the normal renal cortex (Z=-3.980, -3.563, -2.427, -3.389, -3.980, -3.493, -3.528, -2.763, P < 0.001, < 0.001, = 0.015, = 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001, = 0.006). However, there were no significant differences in RT, TTP, FT, or QOF (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

nccRCC exhibits distinctive CEUS characteristics, including slow progression, fast washout, low homogeneity enhancement, and ring enhancement, which can aid in distinguishing nccRCC from ccRCC.

Update on Renal Cell Carcinoma Diagnosis with Novel Imaging Approaches

This review highlights recent advances in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) imaging. It begins with dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), which has demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of renal masses. Several studies have suggested the potential benefits of iodine quantification, particularly for distinguishing low-attenuation, true enhancing solid masses from hyperdense cysts. By determining whether or not a renal mass is present, DECT could avoid the need for additional imaging studies, thereby reducing healthcare costs. DECT can also provide virtual unenhanced images, helping to reduce radiation exposure. The review then provides an update focusing on the advantages of multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performance in the histological subtyping of RCC and in the differentiation of benign from malignant renal masses. A proposed standardized stepwise reading of images helps to identify clear cell RCC and papillary RCC with a high accuracy. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may represent a promising diagnostic tool for the characterization of solid and cystic renal masses. Several combined pharmaceutical imaging strategies using both sestamibi and PSMA offer new opportunities in the diagnosis and staging of RCC, but their role in risk stratification needs to be evaluated. Although radiomics and tumor texture analysis are hampered by poor reproducibility and need standardization, they show promise in identifying new biomarkers for predicting tumor histology, clinical outcomes, overall survival, and the response to therapy. They have a wide range of potential applications but are still in the research phase. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown encouraging results in tumor classification, grade, and prognosis. It is expected to play an important role in assessing the treatment response and advancing personalized medicine. The review then focuses on recently updated algorithms and guidelines. The Bosniak classification version 2019 incorporates MRI, precisely defines previously vague imaging terms, and allows a greater proportion of masses to be placed in lower-risk classes. Recent studies have reported an improved specificity of the higher-risk categories and better inter-reader agreement. The clear cell likelihood score, which adds standardization to the characterization of solid renal masses on MRI, has been validated in recent studies with high interobserver agreement. Finally, the review discusses the key imaging implications of the 2017 AUA guidelines for renal masses and localized renal cancer.

Characteristics of high frame frequency contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal tumors

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the characteristics of high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (H-CEUS) in renal lesions and to improve the ability for differential diagnosis of renal tumors.

METHODS

A total of 140 patients with renal lesions underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from July 2022 to July 2023. Based on the tumor pathology and the results of enhanced CT, tumor patients were divided into malignant and benign groups. All subjects were examined using gray-scale ultrasound, conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (C-CEUS), and H-CEUS, and their dynamic images were recorded. Two radiologists independently analyzed and recorded the results of ultrasound, C-CEUS, and H-CEUS images and statistically analyzed the features of C-CEUS and H-CEUS images. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the difference in age and maximum diameter of nodules between the benign and malignant groups. The χ2 test was used to compare the sex, mode of operation, gray-scale ultrasound characteristics, and enhancement characteristics of the two CEUS modes (enhancement mode, regression mode, enhancement degree, enhancement uniformity, enhancement or not, enhancement direction, post-enhancement boundary and range, and pseudocapsule) between the benign and malignant groups. The difference in vascular morphology of malignant nodules of varying sizes under two angiographic modes.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in gender (χ2 = 10.408, P = 0.001), mode of operation (χ2 = 47.089, P < 0.001), nodule composition (χ2 = 7.481, P = 0.003), nodule echo (χ2 = 20.926, P < 0.001), necrosis (χ2 = 31.343, P < 0.001) and nodule blood flow (χ2 = 9.006, P = 0.029) between the benign and malignant groups. There were significant differences in the regression model (χ2 = 6.782, P = 0.034) and enhancement direction (χ2 = 13.771, P = 0.001) between the two radiographic techniques in the malignant group. There was a significant difference in the enhancement uniformity between the two CEUS techniques in the benign group (χ2 = 8.264, P = 0.004). There was a significant difference between the two CEUS techniques in displaying the vascular morphology in the malignant group with the maximum diameter of nodules ≤ 4.0 cm (χ2 = 11.421, P < 0.022). However, there was no significant difference between the two techniques in the malignant group with the maximum diameter of nodules > 4.0 cm.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the frame rate of ultrasound images is helpful to accurately display the enhanced features and vascular morphology of renal tumors, especially for malignant tumors with a maximum diameter of ≤ 4.0 cm. Thus, H-CEUS can make up for the limitation of CEUS with regard to the display of vascular morphology.

Insights into Renal Cell Carcinoma with Novel Imaging Approaches

This article presents a comprehensive overview of new imaging approaches and techniques for improving the assessment of renal masses and renal cell carcinoma. The Bosniak classification, version 2019, as well as the clear cell likelihood score, version 2.0, will be discussed as new imaging algorithms using established techniques. Additionally, newer modalities, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, dual energy computed tomography, and molecular imaging, will be discussed in conjunction with emerging radiomics and artificial intelligence techniques. Current diagnostic algorithms combined with newer approaches may be an effective way to overcome existing limitations in renal mass and RCC characterization.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Non-Enhancing Renal Masses on CEUS

PURPOSE

To determine the natural history and necessity of long-term follow-up of renal masses that do not demonstrate enhancement on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study was approved by our local IRB and is HIPAA compliant. Exactly 405 patients with 620 non-enhancing renal masses on CEUS from a previously reported study were followed for up to 10 years. Techniques and equipment are described in the original manuscript. Patient charts and imaging studies were reviewed for the change in features. There were 117 (18.6%) patients lost to follow-up leading to 341 patients with 512 lesions. The lesion size, patient age, number of lesions per patient, and Bosniak class assigned at the initial examination was recorded.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 66 ± 12.6 years (range 17-95 years). Average time of follow-up was 58.9 ± 41.7 months (range 1-207 months). There was a mean of 1.5 ± 1.0 lesions per patient (range 1-7 lesions). Lesion size was 24.9 ± 18.2 mm (range 3-161 mm). There were 276 (53.9%) patients with >5-year follow-up and 78 (15.2%) patients with >10-year follow-up. The probability of change within 5 years was 0% (95% CI: 0-0.37 per 100PY) and 10 years 0% (95% CI: 0.0-0.18 per 100PY). Two lesions (0.4%) resolved by 60 months. Five lesions (1.0%) decreased in size. Four lesions (0.8%) increased in size >20% during the follow-up period but remained benign on subsequent imaging.

CONCLUSION

Any non-enhancing renal mass on CEUS can be classified as benign.

Qualitative Assessment of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Oncocytoma

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess whether clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) can be differentiated from renal oncocytoma (RO) on a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHODS

Between January 2021 and October 2022, we retrospectively queried and analyzed our prospectively maintained dataset. Renal mass features were scrutinized with conventional ultrasound imaging (CUS) and CEUS. All lesions were confirmed by histopathologic diagnoses after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). A multivariable analysis was performed to identify the potential predictors of ccRCC. The area under the curve (AUC) was depicted in order to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the multivariable model.

RESULTS

A total of 126 renal masses, including 103 (81.7%) ccRCC and 23 (18.3%) RO, matched our inclusion criteria. Among these two groups, we found significant differences in terms of enhancement (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) (p < 0.001), wash-in (fast vs. synchronous/slow) (p = 0.004), wash-out (fast vs. synchronous/slow) (p = 0.001), and rim-like enhancement (p < 0.001). On the multivariate logistic regression, heterogeneous enhancement (OR: 19.37; p = <0.001) and rim-like enhancement (OR: 3.73; p = 0.049) were independent predictors of ccRCC. Finally, these two variables had an AUC of 82.5% and 75.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic imaging for presurgical planning is crucial in the choice of either conservative or radical management. CEUS, with its unique features, revealed its usefulness in differentiating ccRCC from RO.

Gray-Scale, Color Doppler, Spectral Doppler, and Contrast-Enhanced Renal Artery Ultrasound: Imaging Techniques and Features

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is increasingly being detected in elderly patients as life expectancy increases. RAS induces hypertension or reduces renal function. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography are objective in detecting RAS but may cause iodine-induced nephrotoxicity or nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with RAS. Ultrasound (US) is, by contrast, a noninvasive and real-time imaging modality useful in patients with reduced renal function. Renal US is not as sensitive for detecting RAS because this technique indirectly assesses the renal artery by analyzing intrarenal hemodynamic changes. Although, ideally, US would be used to directly evaluate the renal artery, its current utility for RAS detection remains unclear. The purpose of this review is to introduce how to assess renal artery with US, to describe imaging features of renal artery US, to compare renal artery US and renal US, and to show how to perform work-up in patients in whom RAS is suspected.

Reasons why referring doctors order renal ultrasound contrast studies

PURPOSE

To determine the indications for CEUS for renal mass evaluation.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, IRB-approved, HIPAA compliant study analyzed data from 303 consecutive patients scheduled for a renal CEUS to determine the indications for the examination. A chart review was performed from 05/01/2020 through 05/31/2021 on all patients who received a renal CEUS. The patient demographics were extracted as well as the motivating factor for ordering the examination.

RESULTS

From the 303 patients, 114 were referred because of an indeterminate mass seen on CT and 28 were referred for long-term follow-up of a mass defined as benign or malignant was identified on CT. 9 patients were referred for a CEUS follow-up due to an indeterminate mass on MRI and 6 patients were referred for long-term follow-up of a mass defined as benign or malignant on MRI. 34 patients were referred for follow-up for characterization of a lesion seen on unenhanced ultrasound. 48 patients and 21 patients were referred for long-term follow-up of a previously observed benign or malignant lesion, respectively, seen on CEUS. CEUS was ordered in 21 patients to follow-up a partial nephrectomy and 5 patients for follow-up of a thermal ablation. 7 patients were referred because of a clinical finding.

CONCLUSION

The main reason for a renal CEUS referral is to characterize a mass which could not be characterized on CT or MRI. Another main indication is for long-term follow-up of lesions to decrease radiation dose. Referrals due to inability to receive CT or MRI contrast or renal insufficiency were minor indications.