Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in oncology patients receiving gadoxetic acid and updated risk of estimate of NSF in patients receiving gadoxetic acid with moderate and severe renal impairment

Update on Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Safety, From the AJR Special Series on Contrast Media

Since its introduction more than 35 years ago, gadolinium-enhanced MRI has fundamentally changed medical practice. Although extraordinarily safe, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) may have side effects. Four distinct safety considerations include acute allergiclike reactions, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), gadolinium deposition, and symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure. Acute reactions after GBCA administration are uncommon-far less than with iodinated contrast agents-and, although rare, serious reactions can occur. NSF is a rare but serious sclerodermalike condition occurring in patients with kidney failure after exposure to American College of Radiology (ACR) group I GBCAs. Group II and III GBCAs are considered lower risk, and, through their use, NSF has largely been eliminated. Unrelated to NSF, retention of trace amounts of gadolinium in the brain and other organs has been recognized for over a decade. Deposition occurs with all agents, although linear agents appear to deposit more than macrocyclic agents. Importantly, to date, no data show any adverse biologic or clinical effects from gadolinium deposition, even with normal kidney function. This article summarizes the latest safety evidence of commercially available GBCAs with a focus on new agents, discusses updates to the ACR NSF GBCA safety classifications, and describes approaches for strengthening the evidence needed for regulatory decisions.

Prediction of histopathologic grades of bladder cancer with radiomics based on MRI: Comparison with traditional MRI

PURPOSE

To compare biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI) radiomics signatures and traditional MRI model for the preoperative prediction of bladder cancer (BCa) grade.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 255 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed 113 low-grade and 142 high-grade BCa. The traditional MRI nomogram model was developed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression by the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), vesical imaging reporting and data system, tumor size, and the number of tumors. Volumes of interest were manually drawn on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and ADC maps by 2 radiologists. Using one-way analysis of variance, correlation, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator methods to select features. Then, a logistic regression classifier was used to develop the radiomics signatures. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the diagnostic abilities of the radiomics and traditional MRI models by the DeLong test. Finally, decision curve analysis was performed by estimating the clinical usefulness of the 2 models.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curves (AUCs) of the traditional MRI model were 0.841 in the training cohort and 0.806 in the validation cohort. The AUCs of the 3 groups of radiomics model [ADC, T2WI, bp-MRI (ADC and T2WI)] were 0.888, 0.875, and 0.899 in the training cohort and 0.863, 0.805, and 0.867 in the validation cohort, respectively. The combined radiomics model achieved higher AUCs than the traditional MRI model. decision curve analysis indicated that the radiomics model had higher net benefits than the traditional MRI model.

CONCLUSION

The bp-MRI radiomics model may help distinguish high-grade and low-grade BCa and outperforming the traditional MRI model. Multicenter validation is needed to acquire high-level evidence for its clinical application.

Onconephrology: mitigation of renal injury in chemotherapy administration

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Onconephrology was first coined as a name for the intersection of cancer medicine and nephrology in the early 2010s. It was recognized then that beyond and understanding of kidney physiology, a new generation of nephrologists skilled in both molecular biology and precision medicine were needed to deal with the challenges of emerging cancer therapies. Stem cell transplants, biologic agents, adjuvants blocking basic cellular signaling pathways, immunotherapy were found to promote novel anticancer outcomes, but also to pose new risks to the kidneys. The field rapidly overlapped with emerging expertise in vascular glomerular disease, glomerular disease, and the same biologic agents now applied to auto immune systemic and kidney diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many categories of chemotherapeutic agents have been discovered to have adverse renal side effects. In this review, we address classic chemotherapeutic nephrotoxicity and oncologic clinical situations leading to acute kidney injury. We also review the frontiers of nephrotoxicity reported with cell cycle inhibitors, diverse classes of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, anticancer vaccines, and thrombotic microangiopathies triggered by malignancy and chemotherapy. The aim will be to focus on published strategies to mitigate nephrotoxicity.

SUMMARY

As onconephrology expands into its own field, it gives birth to new subdisciplines. An understanding that patient populations want the benefits of chemotherapy without the renal (and other) systemic toxicities is emerging. A need to develop a new class of molecular and genetic experts in onconephrology to mitigate nephrotoxicity from chemotherapy is apparent and urgent.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of the Cancer-Targeting MRI Contrast Agent MT218 in Healthy Males

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of MT218, a peptide-targeted gadolinium-based contrast agent, in healthy males.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose study including 30 healthy male subjects. In each dose group (0.01, 0.02, 0.04, and 0.08 mmol/kg), 4 subjects received MT218 and 2 subjects received placebo (saline) in bolus injections. The highest dose group (0.08 mmol/kg) was assessed in 2 cohorts, 1 fasted and 1 nonfasted. Clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and electrocardiograms were investigated. Gadolinium concentrations were measured in plasma samples collected before administration and over a 24-hour period postinjection, and in urine specimens collected until 22 days. A noncompartmental model was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. A clinical and biological safety follow-up was carried out for up to 6 months.

RESULTS

No clinically significant modifications in biochemistry, hematology, urinalysis, electrocardiogram parameters, or vital signs were reported at any time point for any treatment group. No serious adverse events were observed in any dose group. Transient dizziness, hyperhidrosis, and injection site coldness were the main adverse events reported in both the MT218 and placebo groups. The mean total apparent clearance decreased slightly with increasing dose, and the median plasma t 1/2 ranged from 1.7 hours in the 0.01 mmol/kg group to 2.7 hours in the 0.08 mmol/kg nonfasted group. MT218 was rapidly excreted via renal filtration with 42.9% to 52.8% of the injected dose measured in urine within the first hour after administration, and 92.5% to 117.3% in urine within 24 hours. No Gd was detected by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in urine after 21 days.

CONCLUSION

Single intravenous administration of MT218 was safely tolerated in the healthy males. Its pharmacokinetic parameters and safety profile are well aligned with those of other gadolinium-based contrast agents.