T1 signal intensity ratio of the pancreas as an imaging biomarker for the staging of chronic pancreatitis

Updates in the Diagnosis of Chronic Pancreatitis: Current Approaches and New Possibilities

This review provides a comprehensive update on the diagnostic approaches to chronic pancreatitis (CP), emphasizing recent advancements in imaging techniques, biomarker research, and multivariable scoring systems. Despite substantial progress in these areas, current diagnostic algorithms have limitations, particularly for early and non-calcific CP. Traditional criteria have focused on classic diagnostic signs, but "minimal change" CP is increasingly recognized through advanced imaging and function tests. This article aims to guide clinicians in applying current methods and available strategies for CP diagnosis and outline research efforts in the field.

T1 signal intensity ratio variability based on sampling strategies in the pancreas of children and young adults

PURPOSE

T1-weighted signal intensity ratios (SIR) comparing pancreas to spleen (SIRps) or muscle (SIRpm) can semiquantitatively assess T1 signal change associated with pancreatitis. However, there is no standardized methodology for generating these ratios. We set out to determine the impact of MRI sequence as well as region of interest (ROI) location, shape, and size on T1 SIR.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of T1-weighted MR images from 118 patients acquired 2018-2023. A single observer placed ovoid ROIs in the pancreas body/tail and head/uncinate, spleen, and left erector spinae muscle and large irregular ROIs in the pancreas tail and spleen. ROIs were placed on images from two sequences: 3D radial 2 point mDIXON RF spoiled gradient recalled echo sequence (radial) and breath-hold 3D 2-point mDIXON RF spoiled gradient echo (BH). T1 SIR were calculated from mean signal intensity, and agreement was calculated with intraclass correlations coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman difference analyses.

RESULTS

118 participants, 57 (48%) female, with mean age 13.7 ± 5.6 years (48%) were included. Agreement was good for SIRps based on irregular versus round ROIs (radial: ICC = 0.90; BH: ICC = 0.91). Agreement was moderate for SIR based on sampling the pancreas body/tail versus head/uncinate (ICC = 0.67-0.76) and poor to moderate based on reference organ (muscle vs. spleen) (ICC = 0.41-0.61). Between sequences, agreement was moderate (ICC = 0.55-0.72, mean difference 0.04-0.09).

CONCLUSION

The size and shape of the ROI used to sample the pancreas does not meaningfully change T1 SIR but the location sampled, the reference organ used, and the MRI sequence used meaningfully change T1 SIR, potentially impacting disease diagnosis and staging.

Enhancing preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and mass-forming chronic pancreatitis: a study on normalized conventional MR imaging parameters

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of signal intensity ratio (SIR) in distinguishing between mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), thereby reducing unnecessary pancreatectomies or delayed diagnosis brought by misdiagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 170 participants (34 with MFCP and 136 with PDAC) who underwent radical pancreatic surgery and were diagnosed via specimen pathology. The study group was carefully selected with a 1:4 ratio matching for sex, age, and operation time between two entities. T1 SIR, T2 SIR, arterial phase (AP) SIR, portal venous phase (VP) SIR, delay phase (DP) SIR, DWI0-50 SIR, and DWI500-1000 SIR, were calculated by dividing the signal intensity of lesions by that of the paraspinal muscle, serving as a reference organ. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was estimated to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Wilcoxon tests were employed for univariate analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine optimal cutoff points and AUC values for selected predictors. A tenfold cross-validation method was applied to validate the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

The ICC demonstrated excellent correlation for both intraobserver and interobserver(ICCs > 0.8). T1 SIR, AP SIR, VP SIR, and DP SIR were significantly lower in the PDAC group compared to the MFCP group, and exhibited good independent predictive properties with the sensitivities of 61.8, 61.8, 70.6, and 73.5%, specificities of 66.2, 68.4, 59.6, and 55.9%, and AUCs of 0.620, 0.659, 0.670, and 0.668, respectively, hovering around 0.7. The tenfold cross-validation confirmed the reliability and robustness of our findings, with consistent AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals over 1000 iterations.

CONCLUSION

T1 SIR, AP SIR, VP SIR, and DP SIR show promise as potential imaging biomarkers for distinguishing between MFCP and PDAC.

Advances in MRI of Chronic Pancreatitis

MRI and MRCP play an essential role in diagnosing CP by imaging pancreatic parenchyma and ducts. Quantitative and semi-quantitative MR imaging offers potential advantages over conventional MR imaging, including simplicity of analysis, quantitative and population-based comparisons, and more direct interpretation of disease progression or response to drug therapy. Using parenchymal imaging techniques may provide quantitative metrics for determining the presence and severity of acinar cell loss and aid in diagnosing CP. Given that the parenchymal changes of CP precede the ductal involvement, there would be a significant benefit from developing a new MRI/MRCP based, more robust diagnostic criteria combining ductal and parenchymal findings.

Management of chronic pancreatitis

Chronic pancreatitis results from repeated episodes of pancreatic inflammation and associated fibrosis leading to the loss of functional exocrine and endocrine pancreatic function. The disease is manifested by abdominal pain, deterioration in quality of life, food maldigestion and malabsorption, diabetes, and an increased risk for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This review summarizes the latest evidence on the diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis and its manifestations. In particular, this review discusses advances in understanding of the role of genetic disorders in the mechanisms of the disease and surgical options for patients refractory to medical therapy. Furthermore, clinical trials are under way to develop medical therapeutics.

Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis Using Postmortem Computed Tomography and Postmortem Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Case Report and a Review of Literature

ABSTRACT

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is inflammation of the pancreas, which may be due to a wide variety of etiologies that share a final common pathway of premature activation of pancreatic enzymes and resultant autodigestion of pancreatic parenchyma. Acute pancreatitis is easy to diagnose clinically, with the presence of at least 2 of the 3 criteria (upper abdominal pain, serum amylase or lipase level greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal, or characteristic findings on imaging studies) of the revised Atlanta classification. However, postmortem imaging examinations of pancreatitis are extremely rare, and very few successful cases have been reported. Here, we present a case report of a single patient who underwent autopsy and postmortem imaging. Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMRI) showed peripancreatic inflammation and acute peripancreatic fluid collection in the left anterior pararenal space, which is consistent with the examination by autopsy. The advantages of PMMRI in AP have also been demonstrated. Our study also confirmed the advantage of PMCT angiography in the diagnosis of AP. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of PMCT and PMMRI combined with postmortem pathology in the diagnosis of AP.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Management of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is a disorder caused by the failure of the pancreas to deliver a minimum/threshold level of specific pancreatic digestive enzymes to the intestine, leading to the maldigestion of nutrients and macronutrients, resulting in their variable deficiencies. EPI is frequently underdiagnosed and, as a result, patients are often not treated appropriately. There is an urgent need to increase awareness of and treatment for this condition. The aim of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update Expert Review was to provide Best Practice Advice on the epidemiology, evaluation, and management of EPI.

METHODS

This Expert Review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPUC and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: EPI should be suspected in patients with high-risk clinical conditions, such as chronic pancreatitis, relapsing acute pancreatitis, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, cystic fibrosis, and previous pancreatic surgery. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: EPI should be considered in patients with moderate-risk clinical conditions, such as duodenal diseases, including celiac and Crohn's disease; previous intestinal surgery; longstanding diabetes mellitus; and hypersecretory states (eg, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinical features of EPI include steatorrhea with or without diarrhea, weight loss, bloating, excessive flatulence, fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies, and protein-calorie malnutrition. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Fecal elastase test is the most appropriate initial test and must be performed on a semi-solid or solid stool specimen. A fecal elastase level <100 μg/g of stool provides good evidence of EPI, and levels of 100-200 μg/g are indeterminate for EPI. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Fecal elastase testing can be performed while on pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Fecal fat testing is rarely needed and must be performed when on a high-fat diet. Quantitative testing is generally not practical for routine clinical use. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Response to a therapeutic trial of pancreatic enzymes is unreliable for EPI diagnosis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Cross-sectional imaging methods (computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound) cannot identify EPI, although they play an important role in the diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic disease. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Breath tests and direct pancreatic function tests hold promise, but are not widely available in the United States. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Once EPI is diagnosed, treatment with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is required. If EPI is left untreated, it will result in complications related to fat malabsorption and malnutrition, having a negative impact on quality of life. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: PERT formulations are all derived from porcine sources and are equally effective at equivalent doses. There is a need for H2 or proton pump inhibitor therapy with non-enteric-coated preparations. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: PERT should be taken during the meal, with the initial treatment of at least 40,000 USP units of lipase during each meal in adults and one-half of that with snacks. The subsequent dosage can be adjusted based on the meal size and fat content. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: Routine supplementation and monitoring of fat-soluble vitamin levels are appropriate. Dietary modifications include a low-moderate fat diet with frequent smaller meals and avoiding very-low-fat diets. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Measures of successful treatment with PERT include reduction in steatorrhea and associated gastrointestinal symptoms; a gain of weight, muscle mass, and muscle function; and improvement in fat-soluble vitamin levels. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 15: EPI should be monitored and baseline measurements of nutritional status should be obtained (body mass index, quality-of-life measure, and fat-soluble vitamin levels). A baseline dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan should be obtained and repeated every 1-2 years.

Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis using semi-quantitative MRI features of the pancreatic parenchyma: results from the multi-institutional MINIMAP study

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic performance of parenchymal MRI features differentiating CP from controls.

METHODS

This prospective study performed abdominal MRI scans at seven institutions, using 1.5 T Siemens and GE scanners, in 50 control and 51 definite CP participants, from February 2019 to May 2021. MRI parameters included the T1-weighted signal intensity ratio of the pancreas (T1 score), arterial-to-venous enhancement ratio (AVR) during venous and delayed phases, pancreas volume, and diameter. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of these parameters individually and two semi-quantitative MRI scores derived using logistic regression: SQ-MRI Model A (T1 score, AVR venous, and tail diameter) and Model B (T1 score, AVR venous, and volume).

RESULTS

When compared to controls, CP participants showed a significantly lower mean T1 score (1.11 vs. 1.29), AVR venous (0.86 vs. 1.45), AVR delayed (1.07 vs. 1.57), volume (54.97 vs. 80.00 ml), and diameter of the head (2.05 vs. 2.39 cm), body (2.25 vs. 2.58 cm), and tail (1.98 vs. 2.51 cm) (p < 0.05 for all). AUCs for these individual MR parameters ranged from 0.66 to 0.79, while AUCs for the SQ-MRI scores were 0.82 and 0.81 for Model A (T1 score, AVR venous, and tail diameter) and Model B (T1 score, AVR venous, and volume), respectively. After propensity-matching adjustments for covariates, AUCs for Models A and B of the SQ-MRI scores increased to 0.92 and 0.93, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Semi-quantitative parameters of the pancreatic parenchyma, including T1 score, enhancement ratio, pancreas volume, diameter and multi-parametric models combining these parameters are helpful in diagnosis of CP. Longitudinal analyses including more extensive population are warranted to develop new diagnostic criteria for CP.

Integrated Physiology of the Exocrine and Endocrine Compartments in Pancreatic Diseases: Workshop Proceedings

The Integrated Physiology of the Exocrine and Endocrine Compartments in Pancreatic Diseases workshop was a 1.5-day scientific conference at the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) that engaged clinical and basic science investigators interested in diseases of the pancreas. This report provides a summary of the proceedings from the workshop. The goals of the workshop were to forge connections and identify gaps in knowledge that could guide future research directions. Presentations were segregated into six major theme areas, including 1) pancreas anatomy and physiology, 2) diabetes in the setting of exocrine disease, 3) metabolic influences on the exocrine pancreas, 4) genetic drivers of pancreatic diseases, 5) tools for integrated pancreatic analysis, and 6) implications of exocrine-endocrine cross talk. For each theme, multiple presentations were followed by panel discussions on specific topics relevant to each area of research; these are summarized here. Significantly, the discussions resulted in the identification of research gaps and opportunities for the field to address. In general, it was concluded that as a pancreas research community, we must more thoughtfully integrate our current knowledge of normal physiology as well as the disease mechanisms that underlie endocrine and exocrine disorders so that there is a better understanding of the interplay between these compartments.