Hepatic hemangioma: contrast-enhancement pattern during the arterial and portal venous phases of spiral CT

Fat-suppressed, three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging using high-acceleration parallel acquisition and a dual-echo Dixon technique for gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI at 3 T

BACKGROUND

Parallel imaging (PI) techniques are used for overcoming lower spatial and time resolution for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). There is clinical need to overcome inevitable noise by decreased voxel size and signal-to-noise issue by using high-acceleration factor (AF).

PURPOSE

To determine whether the combination of a modified Dixon three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted (T1W) gradient echo technique (mDixon-3D-GRE) and high-acceleration ([HA], AF = 5) PI can provide breath-hold (BH) T1W imaging with better image quality than conventional fat-suppressed 3D-T1W-GRE (SPAIR-3D-GRE) for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board and informed consent was waived. There were 138 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MR at 3 T using either standard SPAIR-3D-GRE sequences with an AF of 2.6 (n = 68, Standard group) or mDixon-3D-GRE with an AF of 5 (n = 70, HA group). In the HA group, hepatobiliary phase was obtained three times using HA-mDixon-3D-GRE (AF = 5), HA-SPAIR-3D-GRE (AF = 5), and standard-SPAIR-3D-GRE (AF = 2.6). Image noise, quality, and anatomic depiction of dynamic phase were compared between standard and HA groups, and those of hepatobiliary phase were compared among the three image sets in HA group.

RESULTS

As for dynamic imaging, the HA-mDixon-3D-GRE images showed better anatomic details and overall image quality than standard-SPAIR-3D-GRE sequence (arterial phase: 3.56 ± 0.63 vs. 2.66 ± 0.69, P < 0.001). In the intra-individual comparison, HA-mDixon-3D-GRE provided better orang depiction and overall image quality than standard-SPAIR-3D-GRE (3.99 ± 0.75 vs. 3.0 ± 0.72, P < 0.001) and better fat suppression and significantly less noise than HA-SPAIR-3D-GRE (4.76 ± 0.43 vs. 3.71 ± 0.54, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The combined use of mDixon-3D-GRE sequence and high-acceleration PI provided better quality BH-T1W imaging compared with conventional SPAIR-3D-GRE for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI.

Navigated three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence for gadoxetic acid liver magnetic resonance imaging in patients with limited breath-holding capacity

PURPOSE

To determine whether a navigator-gated three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence (T1W-GRE, navigated LAVA) can improve diagnostic performance for the detection of focal liver lesions (FLLs) compared to standard breath-hold (BH) T1W-GRE breath-hold LAVA (BH-LAVA) during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of gadoxetic acid liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with limited breath-holding capacity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board and the requirement for informed consent was waived. We included 372 patients who underwent liver MRI including both navigated LAVA and BH-LAVA sequences. Overall image quality of the two HBP image sets was compared. In patients with limited breath-holding capacity, diagnostic performances in detecting FLLs on the two HBP images were compared using jackknife-alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis by two reviewers.

RESULTS

There were 13 cases (13/372; 3.5%) of image acquisition failure using the navigated LAVA sequence due to severe irregular breathing, and 50 of 359 patients had limited breath-holding capacity. In these patients, overall image quality of navigated LAVA (2.78 ± 0.95) was significantly better than that of BH-LAVA (2.42 ± 0.81, P < 0.005), and both readers showed significantly higher JAFROC figure-of-merit values with navigated LAVA compared to BH-LAVA (0.94 and 0.86 in reviewer 1, respectively; 0.89 and 0.83 in reviewer 2, respectively, P < 0.005). Overall image quality of navigated LAVA was also better than that of BH-LAVA in patients with sufficient breath-holding capacity (n = 309, 3.96 ± 0.88, 3.81 ± 0.66, respectively, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The navigated LAVA sequence could provide better image quality and diagnostic performance in detecting FLLs than BH-LAVA in patients with limited breath-holding capacity during HBP of gadoxetic acid MRI.

Evaluation of hepatic focal lesions using diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters

PURPOSE

To determine whether parameters obtained from intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using multiple b-values can improve characterization of common focal liver lesions (FLLs), compared with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCtotal ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and informed consent was waived. In all, 142 patients with 169 FLLs underwent liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including IVIM-DWI with multiple b factors at 3.0T. ADCtotal and IVIM-DWI-derived parameters including true diffusion (Dt ), pseudodiffusion (Dp ), and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated for each lesion and compared using dedicated software.

RESULTS

Dt and ADCtotal were significantly lower in malignancies (0.95 ± 0.21, 1.14 ± 0.24, (×10(-3) mm(2) /sec)) than in benign FLLs (1.61 ± 0.34, 1.72 ± 0.37, (×10(-3) mm(2) /sec)). In the differential diagnosis of malignancies from benign lesions, Dt (Az value: 0.971) showed better diagnostic performance than ADCtotal (Az: 0.933) (P < 0.0005). Dt (Az: 0.961) also showed better diagnostic performance than ADCtotal (Az: 0.919) in differentiating hypervascular malignancies from benign hypervascular FLLs (P < 0.0005). In addition, Dp and f were significantly higher in hypervascular FLLs (35.74 ± 20.08 (×10(-3) mm(2) /sec), 28.14 ± 11.82 (%)) than hypovascular FLLs (21.87 ± 13.8 (×10(-3) mm(2) /sec), 12.2 ± 5.92 (%)) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Dt provided better diagnostic performance than ADCtotal in differentiating benign from malignant lesions. Dp and f were significant parameters for diagnosing hypervascular FLLs.

Mixed capillary venous retroperitoneal hemangioma

We report a case of mixed capillary venous hemangioma of the retroperitoneum in a 61-year-old man. Abdominal ultrasonography showed a mass to be hypoechoic with increased flow in color Doppler imaging. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a centripetal filling-in of the mass, located anterior to the left psoas muscle at the level of sacroiliac joint. On the basis of imaging features, preoperative diagnosis of hemangioma was considered and the mass was excised by laparoscopic method. Immunohistochemical studies were strongly positive for CD31 and CD34, and negative for calretinin, EMA, WT1, HMB45, Ki67, synaptophysin, and lymphatic endothelial cell marker D2-40. Histologically, the neoplasm was diagnosed as mixed capillary venous hemangioma.

Atypical hemangioma mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma with a special note on radiological and pathological findings

We report a case of hemangioma with an atypical vascular enhancement pattern. The hemangioma showed peripheral rim enhancement at the arterial phase during dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, and the peripheral enhanced zone was still apparent during the delayed phase, as shown on double-phase computed tomography hepatic arteriography. The rim enhancement pattern of this case, mimicking that of hepatocellular carcinoma, may be due to the surrounding liver parenchymal fibrotic change caused by an active hepatitis C viral infection.

Approach to a liver mass

Incidentally discovered liver masses are becoming more common with the increasing application and power of imaging techniques for the evaluation of abdominal conditions. Although such masses are often benign, conclusive diagnoses must be established in order to provide appropriate patient care. Various imaging modalities can be utilized to accurately diagnose such masses without resort to more invasive diagnostic measures.

Evaluation of nonmalignant liver masses

Nonmalignant liver masses are increasingly being recognized with the widespread use of imaging modalities such as ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The majority of these lesions are detected incidentally in asymptomatic patients. Based on the radiologic appearance, benign lesions can be categorized as solid or cystic, single or multiple, hypervascular or hypovascular. Based on histologic characteristics, they are classified as of hepatocellular, biliary, or mesenchymal origin. In the majority of patients, a proper diagnosis can be made based on these characteristics on imaging modalities alone. An invasive approach is seldom required. This review discusses the various characteristics of the most common benign liver lesions and recommends a practical approach.

Apresentações incomuns do hemangioma hepático: ensaio iconográfico

O nosso objetivo foi descrever e ilustrar aspectos incomuns do hemangioma hepático na ultra-sonografia (US), tomografia computadorizada (TC) e ressonância magnética (RM). A partir da análise retrospectiva de 300 casos de pacientes com diagnósticos de hemangioma hepático, por meio da análise combinada de exames de imagem, biópsia ou acompanhamento clínico, selecionamos aqueles com apresentação atípica em um ou mais métodos de imagem ou aqueles com evolução não usual, ilustrando os seus principais aspectos de imagem. Entre os casos apresentados, escolhemos pacientes com hemangiomas: hipoecogênicos na US; hipovasculares ou avasculares na TC e RM; com calcificações grosseiras; gigantes e medindo mais de 20 cm de diâmetro; predominantemente exofíticos; hipointensos em T2; promovendo defeito de perfusão; com cicatriz central e simulando hiperplasia nodular focal; com crescimento evolutivo. O hemangioma hepático é o tumor mais comum do fígado e geralmente tem apresentação típica. Porém, os seus diversos aspectos não usuais precisam ser conhecidos para auxiliar na orientação diagnóstica e conduta.

A case of atypical caudate lobe hemangioma mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma: CT and angiographic manifestations

We report a case of caudate lobe hemangioma with an atypical CT enhancement pattern. In the present case, hemangioma exhibited a very subtle discontinuous peripheral rim enhancement at the post-enhanced arterial phase, and the peripheral enhanced zone had a moderately increased enhancement degree and with widened enhancement thickness during the portal-phase and delayed-phase. The slow enhancement rate for this caudate lobe hemangioma was due to sluggish perfusion by the small feeding arteries of caudate lobe branches as demonstrated by angiography.

Liver cancer imaging: role of CT, MRI, US and PET

Liver imaging in patients with a history of known or suspected malignancy is important because the liver is a common site of metastatic spread, especially tumours from the colon, lung, pancreas and stomach, and in patients with chronic liver disease who are at risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma. Since benign liver lesions are common, liver-imaging strategies should incorporate liver lesion detection and characterisation. Survey examination in patients with a known extra-hepatic malignancy to exclude the presence of hepatic and extra-hepatic involvement is normally undertaken with a contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination. When patients with hepatic metastases are being considered for metastasesectomy, they undergo a staging examination with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using tissue-specific contrast agents. Patients with chronic liver disease who are at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma undergo periodic liver screening for focal liver detection, usually with ultrasonography (US) with MRI being used when US is equivocal. Finally, contrast-enhanced MRI with extra-cellular gadolinium chelates is preferred for characterisation of indeterminate hepatic masses with liver biopsy used when tissue diagnosis is needed.

Abdominal MDCT: liver, pancreas, and biliary tract

Multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) enables rapid thin-section acquisition of regional body anatomy. MDCT is adapted to hepatic and pancreatic imaging to produce, in appropriate clinical circumstances, a multipass multiplanar study obtained during defined circulatory phases to best outline vasculature and detect and characterize focal parenchymal lesions. In this chapter, a rational approach to hepatic and pancreatic MDCT acquisition is outlined with emphasis on circulatory phases and contrast material pharmacokinetics as well as biological characteristics of focal parenchymal lesions.

Diagnosis, management, and outcomes of 115 patients with hepatic hemangioma

BACKGROUND

Hepatic hemangiomas are congenital vascular malformations and are the most common benign hepatic tumors. Because the use of cross-sectional imaging has increased, benign hepatic tumors, especially hemangiomas, are encountered more frequently, so clinicians should be familiar with the most appropriate diagnostic tests, management, and outcomes of patients with hepatic hemangioma.

STUDY DESIGN

All patients with a primary diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma referred for surgical evaluation at our institution between January 1992 and December 2000 were identified from a prospective database. Demographics, presentation, tumor characteristics, diagnostic studies, surgical procedures, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS; Of 115 patients in the study, nearly half were asymptomatic. In symptomatic patients, abdominal pain or discomfort was the most common presenting symptom. At our institution, the diagnosis of hemangioma was established by ultrasonographic studies in 57% of patients tested, by CT scan in 73%, and by MRI in 84%. In patients with large tumors considered for resection, direct angiography or, more recently, CT angiography, confirmed the diagnosis in 27 of 29 patients (93%). Enucleation was performed in 31 (60%) of the 52 patients who underwent surgical resection; 63 patients were observed. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 patients (25%), and there were no perioperative deaths. Of the patients with symptoms before resection, 96% had resolution of symptoms after operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic hemangioma can be diagnosed in most patients using noninvasive studies, particularly MRI. Hepatic hemangiomas can be removed safely if patients become symptomatic or when malignancy cannot be excluded. CT angiography can be a valuable preoperative study in patients with large tumors, and enucleation is the procedure of choice. In asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients, hepatic hemangiomas usually have a benign course and can be observed.

Benign liver neoplasms

A variety of benign focal liver lesions are easily characterized with currently available imaging techniques and contrast agents. The most common benign liver lesions, such as hemangioma, bile duct cyst, and FNH, reveal characteristic cross-sectional imaging features that allow an accurate diagnosis. For atypical variants and more uncommon lesions, including HCA, angiomyelioma, infantile hemagioendothelioma, and mesenchymal hamartoma, integration of clinical data can often help in the interpretation of imaging studies. Finally, for the remaining lesions, such as hepatic adenomatosis, the imaging findings may not be specific enough to negate the need for a tissue biopsy.

Benign focal lesions of the liver

This article focuses on the origin, diagnosis, and management of focal benign lesions of the liver. The most common lesions include cavernous hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatic adenoma, and nodular regenerative hyperplasia. A number of less frequent occurring lesions are also discussed. In general, the common lesions can be diagnosed by radiologic imaging, but occasionally biopsies are required, and surgical removal is often needed.