SAKK 19/17: safety analysis of first-line durvalumab in patients with PD-L1 positive, advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2

First-line durvalumab in patients with PD-L1 positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a performance status of 2 (PS2). Primary analysis of the multicenter, single-arm phase II trial SAKK 19/17

INTRODUCTION

The safety and efficacy of first-line durvalumab in PS2 patients with advanced NSCLC is unknown. Here, we present the primary analysis of first-line durvalumab in PS2 patients, unsuitable for combination chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial patients with PD-L1 positive (tumor proportional score ≥25%), advanced NSCLC with PS2, received four-weekly durvalumab 1500 mg. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 6 months.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included. Median follow-up was 23.3 months (95% CI: 14.3-28.6). OS at 6 months was 60% (95% CI: 45-74%). Median OS was 8.5 months (95%CI: 4.4-16.7). Objective response rate and median progression free survival were 17% (95% CI: 8-30%) and 2.5 months (95% CI: 1.8-7.1), respectively. Thirty-three deaths were observed at the time point of the analysis. Seven early fatal events considered not treatment-related occurred during the first 5 weeks of treatment. Four out of the first 7 early fatal events (4/7; 57%) were respiratory failure in patients with advanced symptomatic primary lung tumors. Three more early fatal events occurred after exclusion of patients with grade ≥ 3 dyspnea. Treatment-related AEs ≥G3 were reported in 9 patients (19%) and included colonic perforation in one patient (grade 5), colitis in 4 patients (8%), increased lipase in 3 patients (6%), and hepatitis in 2 patients (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

First-line durvalumab in PS2 patients with advanced PD-L1 positive NSCLC results in a high number of early fatal events. When patients with grade ≥ 3 dyspnea are excluded a promising 6-month OS with an acceptable toxicity profile can be observed. Durvalumab could be an option instead of single agent chemotherapy for PS2 patients who are not candidates for platinum doublet chemotherapy provided they are well selected.

A phase II clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of durvalumab as first line therapy in advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2

Background

Approximately 30-40% of patients with advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with an impaired performance status (PS). There are limited prospective data on the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in these patients.

Methods

In this single-arm phase II clinical trial (NCT02879617), patients with previously untreated Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2 received durvalumab 1500 mg every 28 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety determined by grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

Findings

Between April 2017 and March 2021, 50 patients were enrolled, of whom 47 received durvalumab. With a median follow-up of 28 months, median OS was 6 months (95% CI 4-10). TRAEs grade 3 occurred in nine of 47 patients (19%, 95% CI 9%-33%). OS in patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 0, 1-49%, and ≥50% was six months (95% CI 3-15), 11 months (95% CI 4-16), and 11 months (95% CI 0-not reached (NR)), respectively. Health related quality of life (HQRL) assessed at baseline and during therapy demonstrated no statistically significant change over the course of treatment.

Interpretation

This study demonstrates that single agent durvalumab is safe and well tolerated in the 1st line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2, with an encouraging OS benefit in patients with PD-L1 positive tumors. This trial is amongst the largest prospective studies evaluating durvalumab in the 1st line treatment of advanced stage NSCLC and a PS of 2.

Funding

AstraZeneca, NCI P30CA047904.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in "Special" NSCLC Populations: A Viable Approach?

Over the last decade, the therapeutic scenario for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a major paradigm shift. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a meaningful clinical and survival improvement in different settings of the disease. However, the real benefit of this therapeutic approach remains controversial in selected NSCLC subsets, such as those of the elderly with active brain metastases or oncogene-addicted mutations. This is mainly due to the exclusion or underrepresentation of these patient subpopulations in most pivotal phase III studies; this precludes the generalization of ICI efficacy in this context. Moreover, no predictive biomarkers of ICI response exist that can help with patient selection for this therapeutic approach. Here, we critically summarize the current state of ICI efficacy in the most common "special" NSCLC subpopulations.

First-line atezolizumab monotherapy versus single-agent chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen (IPSOS): a phase 3, global, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND

Despite immunotherapy advancements for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pivotal first-line trials were limited to patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 and a median age of 65 years or younger. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of first-line atezolizumab monotherapy with single-agent chemotherapy in patients ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

This trial was a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled study conducted at 91 sites in 23 countries across Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV NSCLC in whom platinum-doublet chemotherapy was deemed unsuitable by the investigator due to an ECOG PS 2 or 3, or alternatively, being 70 years or older with an ECOG PS 0-1 with substantial comorbidities or contraindications for platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Patients were randomised 2:1 by permuted-block randomisation (block size of six) to receive 1200 mg of atezolizumab given intravenously every 3 weeks or single-agent chemotherapy (vinorelbine [oral or intravenous] or gemcitabine [intravenous]; dosing per local label) at 3-weekly or 4-weekly cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were conducted in the safety-evaluable population, which included all randomised patients who received any amount of atezolizumab or chemotherapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03191786.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 11, 2017, and Sept 23, 2019, 453 patients were enrolled and randomised to receive atezolizumab (n=302) or chemotherapy (n=151). Atezolizumab improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy (median overall survival 10·3 months [95% CI 9·4-11·9] vs 9·2 months [5·9-11·2]; stratified hazard ratio 0·78 [0·63-0·97], p=0·028), with a 2-year survival rate of 24% (95% CI 19·3-29·4) with atezolizumab compared with 12% (6·7-18·0) with chemotherapy. Compared with chemotherapy, atezolizumab was associated with stabilisation or improvement of patient-reported health-related quality-of-life functioning scales and symptoms and fewer grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (49 [16%] of 300 vs 49 [33%] of 147) and treatment-related deaths (three [1%] vs four [3%]).

INTERPRETATION

First-line treatment with atezolizumab monotherapy was associated with improved overall survival, a doubling of the 2-year survival rate, maintenance of quality of life, and a favourable safety profile compared with single-agent chemotherapy. These data support atezolizumab monotherapy as a potential first-line treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC who are ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech Inc, a member of the Roche group.

Real-World Data of Combined Immunochemotherapy in Patients With Nonsquamous Advanced NSCLC. A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Introduction

On the basis of the landmark trial KEYNOTE-189 (KN-189), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has become the standard-of-care first-line treatment for patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without oncogenic driver alterations.KN-189 included a selected patient population and lacks external validity. In clinical practice, many patients do not meet the inclusion criteria of KN-189, although they are treated accordingly. It is unknown whether these patients benefit equally as the trial population.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without targetable oncogenic alterations who received the KN-189 treatment regimen between April 2018 and May 2021 at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. Patients were grouped into those who retrospectively met the inclusion criteria of KN-189 (group A) and those who did not (group B). Outcome parameters included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate. Multivariate subgroup analyses were performed.

Results

We identified 75 patients, including 29 patients in group A and 46 patients in group B. Median PFS was 9.2 and 4.6 months in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.12). Median OS was 16.5 and 6.5 months in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.11). Objective response rate was 59% in group A and 33% in group B (p = 0.03). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2 and active infections were significantly associated with shorter PFS and OS.

Conclusions

We report real-world data for patients treated according to the KN-189 regimen with inferior outcomes in patients who did not meet the KN-189 inclusion criteria. Better treatment options for this vulnerable patient population are needed.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse cardiac events in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although people are more and more aware of the cardiotoxicity caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of lung cancer, its incidence rate has not been systematically analyzed. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of cardiotoxicity related to the ICI therapies for lung cancer, so as to enhance clinicians' attention to cardiotoxicity, implement proper prevention and intervention for high-risk patients, and minimize the risk of cardiac dysfunction during and after completion of therapy.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search for relevant publications in PubMed and Scopus from inception to 19 April 2022. Pooled incidence and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for cardiotoxicity events were calculated.

Results

A total of 37 studies covering 38 trials, including 14,342 patients, were identified. The pooled risk ratios of incidence of any cardiac AEs were 1.944 [95% CI 0.8–4.725] (Single ICI versus chemotherapy), 1.677 [95% CI 1.065–2.64] (Single ICI plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy), and 0.478 [95% CI 0.127–1.798] (Single ICI versus Dual ICI). The incidence of myocarditis and arrhythmia were 0.003[95%CI 0.002–0.006] and 0.014[95%CI 0–0.037], respectively.

Conclusion

Single ICI did not increase the risk of cardiotoxicity compared with chemotherapy, and single ICI plus chemotherapy increased the risk of cardiotoxicity by 67% compared with chemotherapy alone. Combination immunotherapy did not increase the risk of cardiotoxicity compared with single ICI.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02760-2.

Handgrip weakness, systemic inflammation indicators, and overall survival in lung cancer patients with well performance status: A large multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation and handgrip weakness have been used to predict mortality in many cancers. The purpose of current study was to evaluate the association of co-occurrence of inflammation indicators and handgrip weakness with overall survival (OS) of lung cancer (LC) patients with good performance status.

METHODS

The cutoff points for handgrip strength (HGS) and the four inflammation indicators were calculated using Maxstat. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve and C-index were used to select optimal inflammation indicator for predicting OS of LC patients. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) of mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to evaluate the association of indicators and the OS of LC patients.

RESULTS

Among the 1951 patients, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 60.6 ± 9.9 years, and 1300 (66.6%) patients were male. In patients with good performance status (PS), handgrip weakness (HR, 1.49; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.30-1.70, p < 0.001) and low advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) (HR, 2.05; 95%CI, 1.79-2.34, p < 0.001), high systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) (HR, 1.91; 95%CI, 1.66-2.19, p < 0.001), high platelet: lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (HR, 1.60; 95%CI, 1.40-1.82, p < 0.001), or high neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR, 2.01; 95%CI, 1.76-2.30, p < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality risk of LC patients. ALI had better C-index (0.624) and time-AUC in the prediction of OS in LC patients with good PS than other three combinations. The co-occurrence of handgrip weakness and low ALI more than doubled the risk of death in LC with good PS (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 2.06-2.89, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In LC patients who have good PS, patients with combined handgrip weakness and low ALI have the worst prognosis.

THE TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1800020329.

Quantification of ferroptosis pattern in bladder carcinoma and its significance on immunotherapy

The role of ferroptosis in tumor development and therapy has been previously proved. Nonetheless, its potential role in tumor microenvironment (TME) and immunotherapy for bladder carcinoma remains unclear. Based on 38 ferroptosis-related genes, the characteristic of ferroptosis patterns and interactions with immune cell-infiltrating features in 2043 bladder cancer samples were systematically investigated. We further proposed the FerrScore to quantify the ferroptosis patterns for each patient. As results, three diverse ferroptosis patterns with distinct tumor-infiltrating immune cell features were established. By determination of ferroptosis patterns of each patient, we found that high FerrScore was related to lower proportion of luminal-papillary molecular subtype, more frequent TP53 mutations, activation of immunity and stroma, and lower 5-year survival. High FerrScore also seemed to be associated with decreased neoantigen load, tumor mutational burden and poorer response to anti-PD-L1/1 therapy. External verification in two immunotherapy cohorts showed FerrScore was an independent and effective prognostic factor for therapeutic effect and survival outcome. Overall, the present study indicated the ferroptosis strongly is closely correlated with TME diversity. Evaluation of the ferroptosis patterns may strengthen the cognition of TME immune cell infiltrations and guide more individualized immunotherapeutic strategies in bladder carcinoma.

Impact of clinicopathological features on immune-based combinations for advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Aims: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently revolutionized the treatment landscape of metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The authors performed a meta-analysis aiming to evaluate the predictive value of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, age, sex, liver metastasis and histology in trials comparing first-line ICI-based combinations with chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients. Methods: Hazard ratios were analyzed. Results: ICI-based combinations significantly decreased the risk of death in several clinicopathological subgroups, including patients with no liver metastases (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74-0.95) and those with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.97). Conclusion: The benefit of ICI-based combinations over chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma was consistent across several clinicopathological subgroups, although a proportion of patients responded to chemotherapy alone.

Host immune-inflammatory markers to unravel the heterogeneous outcome and assessment of patients with PD-L1 ≥50% metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and poor performance status receiving first-line immunotherapy

Background

Patients with programmed cell death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) ≥50% metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and ECOG performance status (PS) of 2 treated with first‐line immunotherapy have heterogeneous clinical assessment and outcomes.

Methods

To explore the role of immune‐inflammatory surrogates by the validated lung immuno‐oncology prognostic score (LIPS) score, including the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the pretreatment use of steroids, alongside other prognostic variables. A retrospective analysis of 128 patients with PS2 and PD‐L1 ≥50% mNSCLC treated between April 2018 and September 2019 with first‐line pembrolizumab in a real‐world setting was performed.

Results

With a median follow‐up of 15.3 months, the 1‐year overall survival (OS) and median progression‐free survival (PFS) were 32.3% (95% CI: 30.9–33.9) and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.8–4.7), respectively. The NLR, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and pretreatment steroids results were the only significant prognostic factors on the univariate analysis and independent prognostic factors by the multivariate analysis on both OS and PFS. The LIPS score, including the NLR and pretreatment steroids, identified 29 (23%) favourable‐risk patients, with 0 factors, 1‐year OS of 67.6% and median PFS of 8.2 months; 57 (45%) intermediate‐risk patients, with 1 factor, 1‐year OS 32.1% and median PFS 2.7 months; 42 (33%) poor‐risk patients, with both factors, 1‐year OS of 10.7% and median PFS of 1.2 months.

Conclusions

The assessment of pre‐existing imbalance of the host immune response by combined blood and clinical immune‐inflammatory markers may represent a way to unravel the heterogeneous outcome and assessment of patients with mNSCLC and poor PS in the immune‐oncology setting.

Poor performance status patient with long-lasting major response to pembrolizumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with coexisting POLE mutation and deficient mismatch repair pathway

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents a major breakthrough in lung cancer treatment. For patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and poor performance status (PS), the availability of sensitivity markers to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) would be useful for attending physicians and assist them in their decision-making process. Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) can lead to high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and coexist with mutations in polymerase proofreading (DNA polymerase Epsilon POLE and delta 1 POLD1) with a specific mutational signature. This would result in high tumor mutational burden and programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) overexpression. We report herein on a NSCLC case with MSI-H and POLE mutation in a patient with inaugural poor general condition, who exhibited prolonged response to anti-programmed cell death protein (PD-1) therapy. Additionally, there was a marked improvement of the patient's performance status, from PS 3 before ICI administration to PS 1 upon ICI therapy.

First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC), either as single agents or combined with chemotherapy. The evidence sustaining their role for poor performance status (ECOG PS ≥2) patients is limited.

METHODS

We search PubMed and the proceedings of international oncology meetings to perform a systematic review to assess the outcomes poor PS NSCLC patients who received ICIs as first-line treatment. A meta-analysis included retrospective studies focusing on pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% NSCLC. We reported the global objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and landmark progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively) in ECOG PS ≥2 and 0-1 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included in the systematic review. Thirty-two retrospective studies focused on pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% cases. In total, 1,030 out of 5,357 (19%) of patients across 30 studies presented with a PS ≥2 at pembrolizumab initiation. In 18 studies with detailed clinical information, worse outcomes in poor PS compared to good PS patients were documented. The meta-analysis revealed that ORR and DCR within the PS ≥2 patient population were 30.9% and 41.5% respectively (55.2% and 71.5% in PS 0-1 patients). The rates of PFS (at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months) and OS (at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months) were approximately double in the good PS compared to the poor PS group of patients. In the three prospective trials where of ICIs in PS 2 populations, the diverse strictness in PS definition likely contributed to the differential outcomes observed. Six retrospective studies dealt with chemo-immunotherapy combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Still with limited prospective evidence sustaining the role of immunotherapy in previously untreated NSCLC with poor PS, 19% of patients in retrospective series dealing with pembrolizumab in PD-L1 ≥50% tumors had an ECOG PS ≥2. Clinical effort encompassing the definition of poor PS, of the factors conditioning it, and the development of dedicated treatment strategies is required to improve the outcomes in this patient population.

The progress and challenge of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer

The use of programmed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors is the standard therapy for the first-line or second-line treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In contrast to current traditional treatments such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments can directly attenuate tumour-mediated exhaustion and effectively modulate the host anti-tumour immune response in vivo. In addition, compared with traditional therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy can significantly prolong survival without obvious side effects in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Ideally, several biomarkers could be used to monitor the safety and effectiveness of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments; however, the current lack of optimal prognostic markers remains a widespread limitation and challenge for further clinical applications, as does the possibility of immune-related adverse events and drug resistance. In this review, we aimed to summarise the latest progress in anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 treatment of advanced NSCLC, worldwide, including in China. An exploration of underlying biomarker identification and future challenges will be discussed in this article to facilitate translational studies in cancer immunotherapy.