Combined vaccine-immune-checkpoint inhibition constitutes a promising strategy for treatment of dMMR tumors

Prophylaxis with abemaciclib delays tumorigenesis in dMMR mice by altering immune responses and reducing immunosuppressive extracellular vesicle secretion

BACKGROUND

The CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib is an FDA-approved agent and induces T-cell-mediated immunity. Previously, we confirmed the therapeutic potential of abemaciclib on mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors in mice. Here, we applied a prophylactic administration/dosage setting using two preclinical mouse models of dMMR-driven cancer.

METHODS

Mlh1-/- and Msh2loxP/loxP mice received repeated prophylactic applications of abemaciclib mesylate (75 mg/kg bw, per oral) as monotherapy or were left untreated. Blood phenotyping and multiplex cytokine measurements were performed regularly. The tumor microenvironment was evaluated by immunofluorescence and Nanostring-based gene expression profiling. Numbers, size and immune composition and activity of extracellular vesicles (EVs) were studied at the endpoint.

FINDINGS

Prophylactic abemaciclib-administration delayed tumor development and significantly prolonged overall survival in both mouse strains (Mlh1-/-: 50.0 wks vs. control: 33.9 wks; Msh2loxP/loxP;TgTg(Vil1-cre: 58.4 wks vs. control 44.4 wks). In Mlh1-/- mice, pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-2, IL-6) significantly increased, whereas IL-10 and IL-17A decreased. Circulating and splenic exhausted and regulatory T cell numbers were significantly lower in the abemaciclib groups. Deeper analysis of late-onset tumors revealed activation of the Hedgehog and Notch signaling in Mlh1-/- mice, and activation of the MAPK pathway in Msh2loxP/loxP;TgTg(Vil1-cre mice. Still, arising tumors had fewer infiltrating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (vs. control). Notably, prophylactic abemaciclib-administration prevented secretion of procoagulant EVs but triggered release of immunomodulatory EVs in Mlh1-/- mice.

INTERPRETATION

Prophylactic abemaciclib prolongs survival via global immunomodulation. Prophylactic use of abemaciclib should be considered further for individuals with inherited dMMR.

FUNDING

This work was supported by grants from the German research foundation [DFG grant number: MA5799/2-2] and the Brigitte und Dr. Konstanze Wegener-Stiftung to CM.

The DNA Damage Response and Inflammation in Cancer

Genomic stability in normal cells is crucial to avoid oncogenesis. Accordingly, multiple components of the DNA damage response (DDR) operate as bona fide tumor suppressor proteins by preserving genomic stability, eliciting the demise of cells with unrepairable DNA lesions, and engaging cell-extrinsic oncosuppression via immunosurveillance. That said, DDR sig-naling can also favor tumor progression and resistance to therapy. Indeed, DDR signaling in cancer cells has been consistently linked to the inhibition of tumor-targeting immune responses. Here, we discuss the complex interactions between the DDR and inflammation in the context of oncogenesis, tumor progression, and response to therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

Accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that DDR is intimately connected to the emission of immunomodulatory signals by normal and malignant cells, as part of a cell-extrinsic program to preserve organismal homeostasis. DDR-driven inflammation, however, can have diametrically opposed effects on tumor-targeting immunity. Understanding the links between the DDR and inflammation in normal and malignant cells may unlock novel immunotherapeutic paradigms to treat cancer.

Short-term immune-checkpoint inhibition partially rescues perturbed bone marrow hematopoiesis in mismatch-repair deficient tumors

Wide-spread cancer-related immunosuppression often curtails immune-mediated antitumoral responses. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a state-of-the-art treatment modality for mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors. Still, the impact of ICI-treatment on bone marrow perturbations is largely unknown. Using anti-PD1 and anti-LAG-3 ICI treatments, we here investigated the effect of bone marrow hematopoiesis in tumor-bearing Msh2loxP/loxP;TgTg(Vil1-cre) mice. The OS under anti-PD1 antibody treatment was 7.0 weeks (vs. 3.3 weeks and 5.0 weeks, control and isotype, respectively). In the anti-LAG-3 antibody group, OS was 13.3 weeks and thus even longer than in the anti-PD1 group (p = 0.13). Both ICIs induced a stable disease and reduced circulating and splenic regulatory T cells. In the bone marrow, a perturbed hematopoiesis was identified in tumor-bearing control mice, which was partially rescued by ICI treatment. In particular, B cell precursors and innate lymphoid progenitors were significantly increased upon anti-LAG-3 therapy to levels seen in tumor-free control mice. Additional normalizing effects of ICI treatment were observed for lin-c-Kit+IRF8+ hematopoietic stem cells, which function as a "master" negative regulator of the formation of polymorphonuclear-myeloid-derived suppressor cell generation. Accompanying immunofluorescence on the TME revealed significantly reduced numbers of CD206+F4/80+ and CD163+ tumor-associated M2 macrophages and CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells especially upon anti-LAG-3 treatment. This study confirms the perturbed hematopoiesis in solid cancer. Anti-LAG-3 treatment partially restores normal hematopoiesis. The interference of anti-LAG-3 with suppressor cell populations in otherwise inaccessible niches renders this ICI very promising for subsequent clinical application.

CDK4/6 blockade provides an alternative approach for treatment of mismatch-repair deficient tumors

Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors show a good response toward immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but developing resistance impairs patients’ outcomes. Here, we compared the therapeutic potential of an α-PD-L1 antibody with the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib in two preclinical mouse models of dMMR cancer, focusing on immune-modulatory effects of either treatment. Abemaciclib monotherapy significantly prolonged overall survival of Mlh1^−/− and Msh2^{loxP/loxP;TgTg(Vil1-cre)} mice (Mlh1^−/−: 14.5 wks vs. 9.0 wks (α-PD-L1), and 3.5 wks (control); Msh2^{loxP/loxP;TgTg(Vil1-cre)}: 11.7 wks vs. 9.6 wks (α-PD-L1), and 2.0 wks (control)). The combination was not superior to either monotherapy. PET/CT imaging revealed individual response profiles, with best clinical responses seen with abemaciclib mono- and combination therapy. Therapeutic effects were accompanied by increasing numbers of tumor-infiltrating CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T-cells and lower numbers of M2-macrophages. Levels of T cell exhaustion markers and regulatory T cell counts declined. Expression analysis identified higher numbers of dendritic cells and neutrophils within tumors together with high expression of DNA damage repair genes as part of the global stress response. In Mlh1^−/− tumors, abemaciclib suppressed the PI3K/Akt pathway and led to induction of Mxd4/Myc. The immune-modulatory potential of abemaciclib renders this compound ideal for dMMR patients not eligible for ICI treatment.

The effects of dendritic cell-based vaccines in the tumor microenvironment: Impact on myeloid-derived suppressor cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are a heterogenous population of professional antigen presenting cells whose main role is diminished in a variety of malignancies, including cancer, leading to ineffective immune responses. Those mechanisms are inhibited due to the immunosuppressive conditions found in the tumor microenvironment (TME), where myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells known to play a key role in tumor immunoevasion by inhibiting T-cell responses, are extremely accumulated. In addition, it has been demonstrated that MDSCs not only suppress DC functions, but also their maturation and development within the myeloid linage. Considering that an increased number of DCs as well as the improvement in their functions boost antitumor immunity, DC-based vaccines were developed two decades ago, and promising results have been obtained throughout these years. Therefore, the remodeling of the TME promoted by DC vaccination has also been explored. Here, we aim to review the effectiveness of different DCs-based vaccines in murine models and cancer patients, either alone or synergistically combined with other treatments, being especially focused on their effect on the MDSC population.