Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty

Is the Anterolateral or Posterolateral Approach More Effective for Early Postoperative Recovery after Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Currently, various minimally invasive surgical techniques are applied for total hip arthroplasty (THA). There are few studies comparing the early postoperative clinical outcomes of minimally invasive THA between anterolateral and posterolateral approaches. In this retrospective study, 62 patients underwent minimally invasive THA via either the anterolateral approach with an intermuscular exposure using the modified Watson-Jones approach (MIS-AL, 34 hips) or mini-incision THA with a posterolateral approach (MIS-PL, 28 hips). We analyzed intraoperative data, postoperative hematological data, postoperative radiographic findings, and the postoperative recovery of muscle strength. The mean surgical time was significantly longer in the MIS-PL than in the MIS-AL group. The mean postoperative serum C-reactive protein level was significantly higher in the MIS-PL group than in the MIS-AL group only on postoperative day 3. There were no significant between-group differences in the postoperative recovery rate of muscle strength during hip abduction. The recovery rate of muscle strength during hip extension was better in the MIS-AL group than in the MIS-PL group only on postoperative day 3. In conclusion, we found no obvious advantage in early postoperative recovery between the MIS-AL and MIS-PL approaches. Therefore, the benefit of rapid postoperative recovery was comparable between the MIS-AL and MIS-PL approaches.

Minimally Invasive Intermuscular Approaches Versus Conventional Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

To date, the literature has not yet revealed superiority of Minimally Invasive (MI) approaches over conventional techniques. We performed a systematic review to determine whether minimally invasive approaches are superior to conventional approaches in total hip arthroplasty for clinical and functional outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence to determine whether minimally invasive approaches are superior to conventional approaches for clinical outcomes.

METHODS

All studies comparing MI approaches to conventional approaches were eligible for analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were adhered to throughout this study. Registries were searched using the following MeSH terms: 'minimally invasive', 'muscle-sparing', 'THA', 'THR', 'hip arthroplasty' and 'hip replacement'. Locations searched included PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Union (EU) clinical trials register and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (World Health Organisation).

RESULTS

Twenty studies were identified. There were 1,282 MI total hip arthroplasty (THAs) and 1,351 conventional THAs performed. There was no difference between MI and conventional approaches for all clinical outcomes of relevance including all-cause revision (P = .959), aseptic revision (P = .894), instability (P = .894), infection (P = .669) and periprosthetic fracture (P = .940). There was also no difference in functional outcome at early or intermediate follow-up between the two groups (P = .38). In level I studies exclusively, random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in aseptic revision (P = .461) and all other outcomes between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Intermuscular MI approaches are equivalent to conventional THA approaches when considering all-cause revision, aseptic revision, infection, dislocation, fracture rates and functional outcomes. Meta-analysis of level 1 evidence supports this claim.

Radiographic results on acetabular cup placement with the SuperPath technique: a retrospective study of 756 cases

Background

The Supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip (SuperPath) technique is a relatively new minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Good clinical outcomes related to its use are reported in the literature. Nonetheless, there are still uncertainties about its validity in terms of radiographic outcomes.

Main purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the SuperPath in acetabular cup positioning through radiographic evaluation of acetabular inclination angle (IA) and acetabular anteversion (AA) angle within the safe zone described by Lewinnek. The leg length discrepancy (LLD), femoral offset (FO), and acetabular offset (AO) were also measured to ascertain the radiographic effectiveness of SuperPath in the acetabular cup placement.

Methods

Between January 2016 and December 2019, all SuperPath cases eligible for the study were included. They were operated by three orthopaedic surgeons with long-standing experience in THA via conventional posterolateral approach and who have performed SuperPath training fellowship. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical assessments (p-value < 0.05). Means ± standard deviation (SD) of the radiographic IA and AA were calculated for each year.

Results

A retrospective analysis of 756 THAs was performed. The average percentage of IA within the Lewinnek’s safe zone was from 80 to 85%, while the average percentage of AA was from 76 to 79%. Both IA and AA showed no statistically significant difference between two consecutive years. Good results, in the ranges of normal values, were also obtained for LLD, FO and AO, with homogeneous outcomes between 1 year and the following one.

Conclusion

It is possible to achieve good radiographic values of acetabular cup orientation through the SuperPath within the Lewinnek’s safe zone. These results are similar to those reported in the literature by authors using SuperPath. Low rate (0,3%) of hip dislocations were reported. Therefore, the SuperPath technique represents a good alternative THA approach. Nevertheless, there is not a statistically significant improvement in these radiographic parameters over a four-year time.

Level of evidence

Level IV, retrospective study.

Minimally Invasive Approaching in Hip Surgery—An Anatomical Investigation of 20 Specimens

Background and objectives: Based on the preparation of 20 formalin-fixed anatomical cadavers, the feasibility of the anterior, minimally invasive approach to the hip joint was investigated in each side of the body. The hypothesis of the study was that the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve can be spared under the use of this approach. Materials and Methods: The anterior approach to the hip was performed via an incision of 8 cm. The position of the nerve was noticed in relation to the skin incision, and the distance was measured in millimeters. The nerves main, gluteal and femoral trunk were distinguished and investigated for injury. Results: No injury of the main trunk was noticed. The average distance of the main trunk to the skin incision was 14.9 and 15.05 mm in the medial direction, respectively (p < 0.001). Injury of the gluteal branch has to be considered at an overall rate of 40%. Conclusions: The anterior, minimally invasive approach to the hip joint can be performed without injury of the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve.

Capsular repair vs capsulectomy in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

A major complication of total hip arthroplasty is dislocation. The hip joint capsule can be incised and repaired, or can be excised.

SOURCES OF DATA

We performed a systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines focusing on capsular repair and capsulectomy.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

We identified 31 articles (17 272 patients). Capsular repair produced a lower blood loss (465.2 vs 709.2 ml), and the procedure lasted 102.5 vs 96.08 min in patients who underwent capsulectomy. The patients undergoing capsulectomy experienced a dislocation rate of 3.06%, whereas in the patients undergoing capsular repair, the dislocation rate was 0.65%.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Most studies are retrospective observational studies, with no prospective randomized trials.

GROWING POINTS

Capsular preservation is association with a lower dislocation rate and a lower blood loss. Capsular excision does take statistically less time, but it is uncertain how a 6 min difference is clinically relevant.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Appropriately powered randomized clinical trials should be conducted to better define the association between the chosen implants, approach and outcome.

Postero-posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty

Introduction

Evolving surgical techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have sought to make the surgical procedures safer. This requires having highly reproducible incision landmarks and simplifying the procedures. The postero-posterolateral approach, a very posterior incision in the hip, meets those requirements. However, this has not helped to reduce the post-operative dislocation rate. The aim of this study was to assess the relevance of combining the postero-posterolateral approach and next-generation dual mobility cups (DMC) in terms of dislocation risk.

Materials and methods

One hundred and fifty-eight THA were performed consecutively using the postero-posterolateral approach on 150 patients, by a single surgeon, over a 49-month period (November 2010 to December 2014). All acetabular implants were impacted.

Results

Average length of the incision was 7 cm (6 to 9 cm). Mean duration of the surgical procedure was 75 minutes (40 to 100). Mean blood loss was estimated at 210 cc (25 to 410 cc). All patients could walk with assistance the day before transferring to a rehabilitation centre. There was one posterior dislocation (0.63%), without recurrence.

Conclusion

The straightforwardness and reproducibility of the anatomical landmarks used for the postero-posterolateral approach, added to the stability of the dual mobility cup, result in a safe combination in the therapeutic THA arsenal.

Learning Curve for the Direct Superior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty

Surgical learning curves are a representation of the number of cases required for a surgeon to reach a stable rate of outcomes and complications. In this study, the authors present the learning curve for the direct superior (DS) approach to total hip arthroplasty, which is a muscle-sparing modification to the mini-posterior technique. This was a retrospective analysis of the first 40 primary DS cases done by a single surgeon. These cases were divided into 2 groups of 20 and compared for intra- and postoperative complications, acetabular component positioning, and Harris Hip Score at 90 days after surgery. As a control, the first 20 primary mini-posterior cases were analyzed as the baseline performance of the surgeon and the DS approach. There was no statistically significant difference between the first and second sets of DS patients regarding Harris Hip Score, intraoperative complications, dislocations, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and components positioned within the Lewinnek safe zone. The only statistically significant difference between the first and second sets of DS cases was a decrease in operating time (P<.001). This suggests that the learning curve is less than 20 patients. The results also indicate that the first 20 DS cases ambulated farther (P=.007) and had a shorter length of stay (P=.007), outperforming the mini-posterior approach. This study suggests that the DS learning curve is short for surgeons trained in the posterior approach. The data could be especially pertinent as 90-day results and safety are becoming increasingly important in evaluating performance for bundled-payment models. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):e237-e243.].

2019 Frank Stinchfield Award: A comparison of prosthetic joint infection rates between direct anterior and non-anterior approach total hip arthroplasty

AIMS

We studied the impact of direct anterior (DA) versus non-anterior (NA) surgical approaches on prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and examined the impact of new perioperative protocols on PJI rates following all surgical approaches at a single institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 6086 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a single institution between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data obtained from electronic patient medical records included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, surgical approach, and presence of deep PJI. There were 3053 male patients (50.1%) and 3033 female patients (49.9%). The mean age and BMI of the entire cohort was 62.7 years (18 to 102, sd 12.3) and 28.8 kg/m² (13.3 to 57.6, sd 6.1), respectively. Infection rates were calculated yearly for the DA and NA approach groups. Covariates were assessed and used in multivariate analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for risk of development of PJI with DA compared with NA approaches. In order to determine the effect of adopting a set of infection prevention protocols on PJI, we calculated ORs for PJI comparing patients undergoing THA for two distinct time periods: 2013 to 2014 and 2015 to 2016. These periods corresponded to before and after we implemented a set of perioperative infection protocols.

RESULTS

There were 1985 patients in the DA group and 4101 patients in the NA group. The overall rate of PJI at our institution during the study period was 0.82% (50/6086) and decreased from 0.96% (12/1245) in 2013 to 0.53% (10/1870) in 2016. There were 24 deep PJIs in the DA group (1.22%) and 26 deep PJIs in the NA group (0.63%; p = 0.023). After multivariate analysis, the DA approach was 2.2 times more likely to result in PJI than the NA approach (OR 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 3.9); p = 0.006) for the overall study period.

CONCLUSION

We found a higher rate of PJI in DA versus NA approaches. Infection prevention protocols such as use of aspirin, dilute povidone-iodine lavage, vancomycin powder, and Gram-negative coverage may have been positively associated with diminished PJI rates observed for all approaches over time. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):2-8.

Comparison of the Incidence of Intra-operative Fractures in Hip Hemi-arthroplasty Performed in Supine and Lateral Positions

Purpose

The difficulty of femoral preparation with supine-position hip hemi-arthroplasty (HA) often leads to intra-operative fractures (IOFs). We aimed to clarify the incidence and types of IOFs in HA for hip fractures performed in the supine and lateral positions.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively investigated cases of HA for acute femoral neck fractures from June 2013 to May 2018. We examined the incidence and types of IOFs according to different approaches. We defined supine-position in HA as the supine and hip-hyperextended (over-range) femoral preparation position, and lateral position as the lateral and hip-flexed femoral preparation position. We used a short tapered wedged stem.

Results

Supine-position HA was used in 46 patients (23.7%) and lateral-position HA in 148 patients (76.3%). IOFs in supine-position HA occurred in 8 patients (17.4%) and included five Vancouver A_GT and three Vancouver B2 fractures. IOFs in lateral-position HA occurred in 3 patients (2.0%) and included one Vancouver A_GT and two Vancouver B fractures. Supine-position HA was a risk factor for IOFs (adjusted odds ratio, 9.71; 95% confidence interval, 2.37-39.8; P<0.01).

Conclusion

Supine-position in HA is an IOF risk factor and significantly increases the incidence of great trochanter fractures of Vancouver type A.

Enhanced recovery after posterior minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with continuous intraarticular anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible complications specific to the continuous intraarticular anaesthesia (CIA) in a minimally invasive posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty and its possible effects on the recovery, especially on pain and the length of hospitalisation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The surgical procedure is first precisely described step by step with numerous per-operating photographs. Particular technical points are detailed. The errors to be avoided are specified. A prospective series of 70 first-line total hip arthroplasties (one half with and one half without CIA) are analysed for the well-known results of total hip arthroplasty but specifically assessing: (a) specific possible complications to the minimally invasive posterior technique with the prolonged local anaesthesia and (b) effects on pain, duration of hospitalisation and satisfaction in patients (questionnaire).

RESULTS

(a) Very low level of immediate post-operative pain was observed in almost all of the patients. (b) Patient satisfaction was high in our series. (c) A repeated education was provided multiple times to avoid specific complications following the absence of pain and consequent inattention.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The minimally invasive posterior approach with continuous intraarticular anaesthesia is an entirely reliable hip arthroplasty procedure. The patients exhibited a significantly less pain and a fast rate of recovery, but preparatory education must be even more significant.

Function and activity after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to a healthy population

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to compare the daily activity and functionality in a patient cohort 12 months after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a direct anterior approach with a healthy non-operated control population.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients who underwent THA and 59 healthy individuals (control) were assessed regarding their daily activity and joint functionality utilizing the Harris hip score (HHS), the extra short musculoskeletal functional assessment questionnaire (XSFMA), the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey and a Stepwatch™ Activity Monitor (SAM). Post-operative x-ray images after THA were analysed regarding inclination and stem positioning.

RESULTS

Twelve months after surgery, the average HHS showed no significant difference between both groups equalling 90.7 points in the THA patient group and 90.8 in the healthy volunteer group. The XSFMA functional index scores were 11.0 (THA) and 5.0 (control) while the bother index summed up to a score of 15.3 (THA) and 7.6 (control) respectively thus differing significantly (p < 0.001). Daily activity equalled 4227 (THA) and 4687 (control) load cycles per day (p = 0.327) while a number of 5658 (THA) and 6417 (control) steps per day (p = 0.011) was recorded. The SF-36 physical component scores were 47.3 (THA) and 50.6 (control) points while the psychometric properties added up to a score of 56.1 (THA) and 55.9 (control). The physical component was determined to be significantly different (p < 0.001) whereas no statistically significant difference could be shown for the psychometric properties (p = 0.511). The radiographic analysis revealed an average cup inclination of 39.9° without signs of migration. Stem positioning was neutral in 53% of all cases while 36% were graded varus and 11% valgus.

CONCLUSION

In summary, our short-term results show an activity, functionality and quality of life for patients one year after THA comparable to healthy control individuals.

A regime of two intravenous injections of tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomised double-blind study

Tranexamic acid (TXA), an inhibitor of fibrinolysis, reduces blood loss after total knee arthroplasty. However, its effect on minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not clear. We performed a prospective, randomised double-blind study to evaluate the effect of two intravenous injections of TXA on blood loss in patients undergoing minimally invasive THA. In total, 60 patients (35 women and 25 men with a mean age of 58.1 years; 17 to 84) who underwent unilateral minimally invasive uncemented THA were randomly divided into the study group (30 patients, 20 women and ten men with a mean age of 56.5 years; 17 to 79) that received two intravenous injections 1 g of TXA pre- and post-operatively (TXA group), and a placebo group (30 patients, 15 women and 15 men with a mean age of 59.5 years; 23 to 84). We compared the peri-operative blood loss of the two groups. Actual blood loss was calculated from the maximum reduction in the level of haemoglobin. All patients were followed clinically for the presence of venous thromboembolism. The TXA group had a lower mean intra-operative blood loss of 441 ml (150 to 800) versus 615 ml (50 to 1580) in the placebo (p = 0.044), lower mean post-operative blood loss (285 ml (120 to 570) versus 392 ml (126 to 660) (p = 0.002), lower mean total blood loss (1070 ml (688 to 1478) versus 1337 ml (495 to 2238) (p = 0.004) and lower requirement for transfusion (p = 0.021). No patients in either group had symptoms of venous thromboembolism or wound complications. This prospective, randomised controlled study showed that a regimen of two intravenous injections of 1 g TXA is effective for blood conservation after minimally invasive THA.

Total hip arthroplasty with minimal invasive surgery in elderly patients with neck of femur fractures: our institutional experience

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether minimal invasive surgery (MIS) in elderly patients with neck of femur fractures would reduce the peri-operative complications and improve the post-operative ambulation and length of hospital stay in his cohort of patients. Forty elderly patients were treated with either total hip arthroplasty (THA) or bipolar prosthesis using MIS transgluteal approach. A matched reference group treated with a conventional surgical approach formed the control group. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. Selection of acetabular component included Novae® uncemented press fit dual mobility concept socket or Bipolar Hemi-Arthroplasty (BHA). The femoral implant was Corail® uncemented stem or Fjord® cemented stem when primary instability was encountered. The follow-up was done for all patients and its minimum length was more than thirty-six months. The average length of the skin incision was 7 (6-8) SD 0.7 cm. Eighteen THA, twenty-two BHA, thirty-seven uncemented femoral stems and three cemented stems were implemented. The length of the procedure was the same as those of the reference group. The operative and post-operative blood loss and analgesic use were significantly decreased in the MIS group. Radiographic implants positioning was similar amongst the two groups. No skin complication, no primary infection, no death within ninety days and no dislocations were observed. MIS approach for implanting THA after a femoral neck fracture in the elderly appears to be a reliable procedure.

Total hip arthroplasty through the mini-incision (Micro-hip) approach versus the standard transgluteal (Bauer) approach: a prospective, randomised study

PURPOSE

To compare outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA) through the mini-incision approach versus the standard transgluteal approach.

METHODS

80 women and 63 men aged 33 to 89 (mean, 62) years with primary osteoarthritis of the hip were randomised to undergo unilateral THA through a mini-incision approach (Micro-hip, n=55) or standard, lateral, transgluteal approach (Bauer, n=88). Levels of haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum creatine kinase, and C-reactive protein, length of hospital stay, mobilisation, and any complication were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain was assessed. Hip function was assessed using the Harris Hip Score and the Oxford Hip Score, whereas general health was assessed using the EQ-5D general health questionnaire. The cup inclination and varus/valgus of the stem position were measured using a goniometer.

RESULTS

The Micro-hip group achieved a significantly lower mean incision length (9.3 vs. 13.4 cm, p<0.001), mean surgical time (60 vs. 68 minutes, p=0.021), mean reduction in haemoglobin level (2.1 vs. 2.8 g/dl, p<0.001), and mean VAS for pain from hour 6 to day 6 (all p<0.05). One patient in the Micro-hip group developed early aseptic loosening of the cup and underwent revision surgery at month 4. Three patients in the Bauer group and one patient in the Micro-hip group sustained intra-operative nondisplaced fractures of the proximal femur, which were fixed with cerclages. Two patients in the Microhip group developed deep vein thrombosis during week 1.

CONCLUSION

THA through the Micro-hip approach achieved faster pain relief.

Mini-incision versus standard incision total hip arthroplasty regarding surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose

It remains controversial whether mini-incision (MI) benefits patients in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of MI on surgical and functional outcomes in THA patients.

Methods

A systematic electronic literature search (up to May 2013) was conducted to identify RCTs comparing MI with standard incision (SI) THA. The primary outcome measures were surgical and functional outcomes. According to the surgical approach taken, MI THA patients were divided into four subgroups for sub-group meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk differences (RDs) with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using a fixed-effect or random-effect model according to the heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 14 RCTs involving THA 1,174 patients met the inclusion criteria. The trials were medium risk of bias. The overall meta-analysis showed MI THA reduced total blood loss (95% CI, -201.83 to -21.18; p=.02) and length of hospital stay ( 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.08; p=.01) with significant heterogeneity. However, subgroup meta-analysis revealed posterior MI THA had perioperative advantages of reduced surgical duration ( 95% CI, -8.45 to -2.67; P<.001), less blood loss ( 95% CI, -107.20 to -1.73; P=.04) and shorter hospital stay ( 95% CI, -0.74 to -0.06; p=.002) with low heterogeneity. There were no significant differences between MI and SI THA groups in term of pain medication dose, functional outcome (HHS), radiological outcome or complications (P>.05, respectively).

Conclusions

Although no definite overall conclusion can be arrived at on whether MI THA is superior to SI THA, posterior MI THA clearly result in a significant decrease in surgical duration, blood loss and hospital stay. It seems to be a safe minimally invasive surgical procedure without increasing the risk of component malposition or complications.

The mini postero-postero-lateral mini incision in total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Mini invasive incisions in THA and femoral hip prostheses tend to minimise healing and recovery time. We have used a very posterior approach with technical modifications and precise skin landmarks to decrease surgical complexity, and we describe this experience here.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2012, 140 patients aged 79 years (range 53-93 years) were operated upon by the same surgeon in a continuous series using the same minimally invasive skin incision and six different types of implants. The incision was very posterior in the hip allowing direct visualisation of the acetabulum in the hip flexion position and visualisation of the femoral shaft extremity in a leg flexion position.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 100 minutes (range 75-110 min). Estimated blood loss was 385 cc (20-585 cc). Twenty-six patients had blood transfusion. The mean hospital stay was 6.8 days (5-20 days) including the time waiting for a rehabilitation centre. No operative complications related to the technique were recorded. On the postoperative radiograph, the femoral stem was aligned with the femoral axis within 3° in all patients. The mean acetabular angle to the ground plane was 40° (35-48°). No patient had a leg length discrepancy of more than four millimetres. The mean skin incision length was seven centimetres (six to eight centimetres). All patients were seen at the clinic after six weeks and the data were unchanged at this time point.

CONCLUSION

The method and skin landmarks we describe appear to be a safe way to perform minimally invasive total hip replacement.

Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The literature comparing limited incision and standard incision THAs is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival. Further, previously published meta-analyses cannot conclude that limited incision THA is better. With new data, we seek to discover if the answers now exist.

PURPOSE

We used meta-analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data, clinical outcomes, and complication rates, and thus (1) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to standard incision THA; and (2) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over standard incision THA.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched using the terms "minimally", "invasive", and "total hip". Inclusion was limited to studies directly comparing limited incision with standard incision THA and reporting effect sizes.

RESULTS

We identified 418 articles. Of these 11 provided background information and 30 provided data (3548 THAs) for the systematic review. Limited incision THA was better than standard incision THA in four measures: length of hospitalization (6 versus 7 days), VAS pain at discharge (2 versus 4), blood loss (421 mL versus 494 mL), and the Harris hip score at 3 months postoperation (90 versus 84). There were no outcomes for which standard incision was better. There was no major difference in the rate of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term recovery favors limited incision over standard incision THA. The lack of consistent reporting for surgical outcomes, clinical outcomes, and complications continues to create difficulties when comparing limited and standard incision THAs.

Minimally invasive surgical approaches and traditional total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of radiological and complications outcomes

Background

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (MITHA) remains considerably controversial. Limited visibility and prosthesis malposition increase the risk of post-surgical complications compared to those of the traditional method.

Methods

A meta-analysis was undertaken of all published databases up to May 2011. The studies were divided into four subgroups according to the surgical approach taken. The radiological outcomes and complications of minimally invasive surgery were compared to traditional total hip arthroplasty (TTHA) using risk ratio, mean difference, and standardized mean difference statistics.

Results

In five studies involving the posterolateral approach, no significant differences were found between the MITHA groups and the TTHA groups in the acetabular cup abduction angle (p = 0.41), acetabular anteversion (p = 0.96), and femoral prosthesis position (p = 0.83). However, the femoral offset was significantly increased (WMD = 3.00; 95% CI, 0.40–5.60; p = 0.02). Additionally, there were no significant differences among the complications in both the groups (dislocations, nerve injury, infection, deep vein thrombosis, proximal femoral fracture) and revision rate (p>0.05). In three studies involving the posterior approach, there were no significant differences in radiological outcomes or all other complications between MITHA or TTHA groups (p>0.05). Three studies involved anterolateral approach, while 2 studies used the lateral approach. However, the information from imaging and complications was not adequate for statistical analysis.

Conclusions

Posterior MITHA seems to be a safe surgical procedure, without the increased risk of post-operative complication rates and component malposition rates. The posterolateral approach THA may lead to increased femoral offset. The current data are not enough to reach a positive conclusion that lateral and anterolateral approaches will result in increased risks of adverse effects and complications at the prosthesis site.

Is the internal rotation lag sign a sensitive test for detecting hip abductor tendon ruptures after total hip arthroplasty?

Introduction

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most frequently performed procedures in orthopaedics and weakness of external rotators is often recognized thereafter. However, the etiology of lateral hip pain is multifaceted. For the diagnosis of abductor tendon rupture, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard. As not every patient can be subjected to MRI, a clinical diagnostic test for easy detection of lesions of the abductor tendon is missing. Here, we present the internal rotation lack sign indicating abductor tendon pathology.

Methods

The patient is placed in lateral position on a stretcher with hips and knees in neutral position. The knee is flexed to 45° and the hip passively abducted and elevated by the investigator. With the foot passively abducted, the patient is then asked to bring his knee in direction to the examination table. This motion is also tested passively. The test is regarded positive, if no internal rotation is possible and/or if this is painful. If groin pain is elicited during either of the exercises, the test is also rated positive.

Results

We evaluated this test in 20 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All patients demonstrated a positive internal rotation lag sign. Twelve of them lag of internal rotation and evidence of anterior abductor tendon rupture on MRI, 8 with lag of internal rotation and no evidence of abductor tendon rupture.

Conclusion

The new clinical diagnostic sign presented here may improve the diagnosis of abductor tendon rupture in the future.

Level of Evidence: Diagnostic study, level I.

Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) is claimed to be superior to the standard technique, due to the potential reduction of soft tissue damage via a smaller and tissue-sparing approach. As a result of the lack of objective evidence of fewer muscle and tendon defects, controversy still remains as to whether minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty truly minimizes muscle and tendon damage. Therefore, the objective was to compare the influence of the surgical approach on abductor muscle trauma and to analyze the relevance to postoperative pain and functional recovery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2006 and July 2007, 44 patients with primary hip arthritis were prospectively included in the study protocol. Patients underwent cementless unilateral total hip arthroplasty either through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach (ALMI) (n = 21) or a modified direct lateral approach (mDL) (n = 16). Patients were evaluated clinically and underwent MR imaging preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Clinical assessment contained clinical examination, performance of abduction test and the survey of a function score using the Harris Hip Score, a pain score using a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0-10, as well as a satisfaction score using an NRS of 1-6. Additionally, myoglobin and creatine kinase were measured preoperatively, and 6, 24 and 96 h postoperatively. Evaluation of the MRI images included fatty atrophy (rating scale 0-4), tendon defects (present/absent) and bursal fluid collection of the abductor muscle.

RESULTS

Muscle and tendon damage occurred in both groups, but more lateral gluteus medius tendon defects [mDL 3/12mth.: 6 (37%)/4 (25%); ALMI: 3 (14%)/2 (9%)] and muscle atrophy in the anterior part of the gluteus medius [mean-standard (12): 1.75 ± 1.8; mean-MIS (12): 0.98 ± 1.1] were found in patients with the mDL approach. The clinical outcome was also poorer compared to the ALMI group. Significantly, more Trendelenburg's signs were evident and lower clinical scores were achieved in the mDL group. No differences in muscle and tendon damage were found for the gluteus minimus muscle. A higher serum myoglobin concentration was measured 6 and 24 h postoperatively in the mDL group (6 h: 403 ± 168 μg/l; 24 h: 304 ± 182 μg/l) compared to the ALMI group (6 h: 331 ± 143 μg/l; 24 h: 268 ± 145 μg/l).

CONCLUSION

Abductor muscle and tendon damage occurred in both approaches, but the gluteus medius muscle can be spared more successfully via the minimally invasive approach and is accompanied by a better clinical outcome. Therefore, going through the intermuscular plane, without any detachment or dissection of muscle and tendons, truly minimizes perioperative soft tissue trauma. Furthermore, MRI emerges as an important imaging modality in the evaluation of muscle trauma in THA.

Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

For total hip arthroplasty (THA), minimally invasive surgery (MIS) uses a smaller incision and less muscle dissection than the classic approach (CLASS), and may lead to faster rehabilitation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Does minimally invasive hip arthroplasty result in superior clinical outcomes?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 120 consecutive primary noncemented THAs in 120 patients were assigned to one of two groups (MIS or CLASS). The randomization sequence was stratified for two groups of surgeons, ie, those using a posterolateral approach (PL-CLASS or PL-MIS) and those using an anterolateral approach (AL-CLASS or AL-MIS). Length of the incisions was 18 cm for the CLASS procedures. MIS incisions were extended at the skin level to 18 cm at the end of the procedure. The primary end point was the Harris hip score (HHS) at 6 weeks postoperatively. Patient-centered questionnaires were obtained preoperatively and after 6 weeks and 1 year.

RESULTS

For the patients in the MIS group (average 7.8 cm incision length), statistically significant increased mean HHSs were seen compared with the CLASS group at 6 weeks and 1 year. This difference was small and mainly caused by the favorable results of the PL-MIS. In the MIS group, surgical time was longer. A learning curve was observed based on operation time and complication rate. Although not statistically significant, the perioperative complication rate was rather high in the (anterolateral) MIS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The minimal invasive approach in THA did not show a clinically relevant superior outcome in the first postoperative year.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes

Over the past decade, minimally invasive surgery has gained popularity as a means of optimising early postoperative rehabilitation and increasing patient satisfaction and cosmesis following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, this surgical exposure has also been associated with increased risk of iatrogenic nerve injury and implant mal-positioning due to limited visibility compared to conventionally larger surgical incisions. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of these two surgical exposures. A systematic review of the published and unpublished literature was conducted to include all randomised and non-randomised controlled trials comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive and conventional THA procedures. In total, 28 studies met the eligibility criteria and included 2,849 hips, i.e. 1,428 minimally invasive compared to 1,421 conventional THAs. The meta-analysis of the current evidence base showed that minimally invasive THA is associated with a significantly increased risk of transient lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy (p = 0.006) with no significantly better outcome.

A randomised clinical trial comparing minimally invasive surgery to conventional approach for endoprosthesis in elderly patients with hip fractures

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the concept of minimally invasive surgery has invaded the orthopaedic field and literature on the subject is spawning. Mini-incision surgery for total hip arthroplasty has been studied without a clear consensus on the efficacy, safety and advantage of that technique. To our knowledge, the efficacy and safety of mini-incisions in hip fracture surgery has not been studied in a randomised fashion.

METHODS

This study is a prospective clinically randomised trial whose primary objective was to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a single posterior mini-incision approach compared to a standard posterior approach for endoprosthesis in acute femoral neck fractures. The mini-incision was defined as less than 8 cm. 25 patients in the mini-incision surgery (MIS) group and 31 patients in the standard incision group (STD) were available for analysis. The following validated disease-specific outcome instruments were used: the Lower Extremity Measurement (LEM) and the Time Up and Go (TUG). Secondary endpoints of pain, function, and quality of life were assessed by the components of the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and SF-36. Radiographic outcomes were also evaluated as well as the rates of all reported complications and adverse events during the 2 years follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference for operative time, blood losses, 72 h postoperative haemoglobin as well as the need for transfusion therapy between the two groups. Also, there was no difference between the groups for postoperative morphine use and pain evaluation with the Visual Analog Scale. The functional assessment using LEM and TUG did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference between mini- and standard incision. However, the HHS and the physical function component of the SF-36 were statistically better at 2 years in favour of the standard incision group.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of the present study, we cannot recommend the use of a minimally invasive approach over a standard approach in the implantation of a cemented endoprosthesis.

The anterolateral minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique, pitfalls, and way out

Different approaches for the hip have been developed for minimally invasive surgery in total hip arthroplasty. The goal of minimally invasive surgery is to reduce invasiveness to skin, muscles, and bone and improve recovery time after total hip arthroplasty. This article describes the technique of a minimally invasive approach to the hip from the anterolateral direction step by step and includes preoperative settings and pitfalls.

Outcomes following the single-incision anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter observational study

The authors conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 1,152 patients across nine clinical sites across the United States, evaluating complications and function associated with the anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty using an orthopedic table. Eligible patients included those with primary diagnosis of hip arthritis. Outcomes included hospital stay, use of assistive devices, complications, and function. In the cohort of 1,152 patients treated with the anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty, the authors found (i) an acceptable complication profile with a very low dislocation rate, (ii) an early return to function, and (iii) a decline in complications in surgeons with greater than 100 case experiences.

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

The purpose of this study was to compare the operative outcome between mini and standard incisions in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We identified 12 randomised or quasi-randomised control trials (RCT or qRCT) published between 1996 and 2008. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the differences in results for surgical approach, trial quality, and follow-up duration. Operative time and blood loss were significantly reduced in the mini-incision group for studies with the posterior or posterolateral approach. Concerning postoperative complications, there were no significant differences between the two groups with no significant heterogeneity. No differences were observed between the two groups for Harris hip score and radiographic results except for cup anterversion. Although mini-incision appeared to have similar outcomes compared to standard incision, the follow-up is short-term according to current standards in THA. High-quality studies are required to compare the outcomes of these two procedures.

[Minimally invasive vs. transgluteal total hip replacement. A 3-month follow-up of a prospective randomized clinical study]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the results after total hip replacement (THR) using an MIS approach versus a regular transgluteal approach (Bauer approach).

METHOD

We compared 20 THRs using a modified Watson-Jones minimally invasive approach (MIS group) with 20 conventionally performed THRs using a Bauer approach (control group). In all cases, the same implants (Trilogy cup, MAYO stem) were used. The Harris Hip Score (HHS), the visual analogue scale, myoglobin level, and creatinine kinase level were measured preoperatively and up to 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Advantages of the MIS group were evaluated using the HHS in the categories of activity and range of motion 6 weeks postoperatively. In terms of function, gait, and total HHS, we found benefits in the MIS group 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Up to 48 h postoperatively, patients in the MIS group had lower myoglobin blood levels. No differences were found in creatinine kinase levels, pain sensation as measured by visual analogue scale, or implant positioning.

CONCLUSION

Use of the minimally invasive Watson-Jones approach shows advantages compared with the transgluteal Bauer approach 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Up to now there has been no prospective randomized clinical study that has definitely shown the superiority of the minimally invasive procedure. For that reason, the conventional approaches in THR are still the gold standard.

Outcomes-based evaluations supporting computer-assisted surgery and minimally invasive surgery for total hip arthroplasty

Minimally invasive surgeries, as well as computer-assisted surgery for total hip replacement have gained popularity over recent years. This article provides an overview of state-of-the-art minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and computer-assisted surgery for total hip arthroplasty. A comprehensive review of the literature for scientific evidence supporting the use of these technologies was undertaken. This review evaluates whether commonly asked questions concerning these topics have been addressed. Controversy remains as to whether there are significant benefits of MIS or computer-assisted surgery for total hip arthroplasty. Fortunately, most studies report similar outcomes for both technologies. Minimally invasive techniques have been developed that do not significantly increase operative time or immediate postoperative complications. Computer-assisted navigation has shown improved radiographic alignment for total hip arthroplasty and may allow MIS to be performed more optimally. The authors believe that both of these technologies are likely to have a place in the future for hip arthroplasty with expectations of increased successful outcomes with these techniques while lowering complications and costs. Long-term outcomes of both techniques will need to be investigated.

[Prospective and comparative study of minimally invasive posterior approach versus standard posterior approach in total hip replacement]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

There have been few prospective studies comparing minimally invasive approaches for total hip replacement. We wanted to ascertain the contribution of the minimally invasive posterior approach in comparison with the standard posterolateral approach in terms of early outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was prospective comparative consecutive series of patients. Patients with major architectural problems or undergoing revision arthroplasty were excluded. One hundred ten patients (116 hips) were divided into two groups which were comparable for number of patients, gender, age, body mass index, indication for surgery, and preoperative function scores. The preoperative ASA score was lower in the minimally invasive group (p=0.04). The patients were in the lateral reclining position for the two approaches and classical instrumentation using the same implants (stems and cemented or non-cemented cups) were used. We noted operative time and blood loss (using the Brecher method based on the hematocrit at day 1 and 5 and the number of blood transfusions), postoperative pain, and implant position. Functional outcome was assessed with the modified Harris score and the WOMAC index (at 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months). Statview(R) was used to search for statistical significance considering p<0.05 as significant.

RESULTS

Mean length of incision was 8.5 cm versus 15.1 cm. Mean blood loss was significantly less in the minimally invasive group (p=0.027) as was the level of postoperative pain as confirmed by the lesser consumption of morphine analgesics (p=0.006). Other operative variables as well as implant position were comparable. There were no major complications in the minimally invasive group. In the standard group, there was one case of common peroneal nerve palsy, two dislocations, and two fractures related to falls after prosthesis implantation. The WOMAC index was better after the minimally invasive approach at six weeks and at three months (p<0.05). The modified Harris score was better only at six weeks. Functional outcome and pain became comparable thereafter.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The minimally invasive posterior approach does not require an orthopedic table nor specific instrumentation. A minute procedure is required with ligature of the posteromedial circumflex artery of the thigh to improve exposure and limit intraoperative bleeding. It enables satisfactory reproducible implant positioning. Conversion to an open posterolateral approach is possible if needed. The minimally invasive posterior approach enables a reduction in intraoperative bleeding and in postoperative pain while allowing earlier more rapid rehabilitation. Early clinical outcome is better but beyond six weeks, the functional results are comparable for the two approaches. The minimally invasive posterior approach is a reliable reproducible approach with a progressive learning curve.

Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results

The interest in minimally invasive approaches for total hip replacement (THR) has not waned in any way. We carried out a prospective and comparative study in order to analyse the interest of the anterolateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach in comparison with a minimally invasive posterior (MIP) approach. A group of 35 primary THRs with a large head using the ALMI approach was compared with a group of 43 THR performed through a MIP approach. The groups were not significantly different with respect to age, sex, bony mass index, ASA score, Charnley class, diagnoses and preoperative Womac index and PMA score. The preoperative Harris Hip Score was significantly lower in the ALMI group. The duration of surgical procedure was longer and the calculated blood loss more substantial in the ALMI group. The perioperative complications were significantly more frequent in this group, with four greater trochanter fractures, three false routes, one calcar fracture, and two metal back bascules versus one femoral fracture in MIP group. Other postoperative data (implant positioning, morphine consumption, length of hospital stay, type of discharge) are comparable, such as the early functional results. No other complication has been noted during the first 6 months. The ALMI approach uses the intermuscular interval between the tensor fascia lata and the gluteus medius. It leaves intact the abductor muscles, the posterior capsule and the short external rotators. The early clinical results are excellent, despite the initial complications related to the initial learning curve for this approach and the use of a large head. The stability and the absence of muscular damage should permit acceleration of the postoperative rehabilitation in parallel with less perioperative complications after the initial learning curve.

Method to reduce variations of inclination angle of the acetabular component during mini-incision hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

To reduce variations of cup inclination after total hip arthroplasty using the mini-incision posterior approach, we introduced two techniques, one at a time. The first technique is measuring a pelvic tilt angle in the frontal plane in the initial lateral position in the operating room. The second technique is using a tilt-meter to adjust the direction of a cup holder. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of these techniques.

METHODS

For 106 hips operated on, the cementless acetabular component was impacted using a cup holder targeting 45 degrees in inclination and 20 degrees in anteversion. These hips were divided into three consecutive groups. For the first group (30 hips), no radiograph in the lateral position was obtained, and the alignment frame of the cup holder was aligned parallel to the floor by eye measurement. For the second group (56 hips), we measured the pelvic tilt angle, and tilted the alignment frame by eye measurement. For the third group (20 hips), we measured the pelvic tilt angle and tilted the alignment frame using the tilt meter. Inclination and anteversion angles were measured on postoperative radiographs. The absolute value of the difference between the measured angle and the target angle was defined as the inclination error or anteversion error, respectively.

RESULTS

The inclination error was more than 5 degrees for 33% in the first group, 20% in the second group, and 0% in the third group (P = 0.015, chi-squared test). There was a significant difference between the first group and the third group (P = 0.0039). For the anteversion error, there were no significant differences among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjustment using a tilt-meter after measuring a pelvic tilt angle is a useful method to reduce the rate of large inclination error.

Antero-lateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach for total hip arthroplasty technique and early results

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgery represents one of the most recent techniques to have emerged within THA. In conventional THA, the incision typically measures 15-20 cm. Minimal invasive approach defined as less invasive to the skin, muscles, or bone may reduce complications and improve recovery time. A number of different approaches and methods have been described in literature.

PURPOSE

This is a prospective study describing the technique and early results of the modified antero-lateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach and comparing our results to the results of other investigators interested in minimal invasive THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties (cemented and cementless) were done through a modified ALMI approach (6-8 cm), in which we kept the hip abductors intact. Neither special instruments nor specially designed prostheses were needed. Minimum follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean Harris hip score for patients after 12-month follow-up was 90 while the mean Merle d'Abugine mean score was 16.5. Both scores reached almost the maximum values within 3 months after surgery. The cup abduction angle for 70% patients was between 35 degrees and 45 degrees. No femoral stem mal-alignment was recorded. The mean operative time of cemented prosthesis was 65 min while that of the cementless prosthesis was 55 min. No wound complications or dislocations were recorded. All the patients were allowed to weight bear in the second post-operative day and involved in an early rehabilitation program.

CONCLUSION

ALMI hip approach with sparing of hip abductors is safe and gives excellent orientation for positioning of prosthesis components. It also allows early and smooth post-operative rehabilitation with fast recovery of the patient in terms of weight bearing.

Resurfacing hip arthroplasty: comparison of a minimally invasive versus standard approach

Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing recently has gained popularity as a femoral-bone-preserving procedure. There has been a concomitant upsurge in demand by patients and the surgical community for the use of minimally invasive techniques for hip arthroplasty procedures. The fundamental questions are whether these techniques can lead to better short-term outcomes without leading to increased operative times, blood loss, transfusion requirements, length of stay, and clinical and/or radiographic complications. We compared a group of 25 patients (25 hips) in whom resurfacing with a minimally invasive approach was done, with a cohort of 25 patients (25 hips) who had resurfacing using a standard procedure. Patients were followed up for a mean of 19 months (range, 17-22 months). The minimally invasive group had less intraoperative blood loss (566 mL in the minimally invasive group versus 683 mL), and better 3-month Harris hip scores (78 versus 70 points). At latest followup, there were no differences in clinical (mean Harris hip scores 95 and 93 points, respectively) or radiographic outcomes. This minimally invasive approach may be a reasonable option for joint resurfacing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, Level II (retrospective comparison study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty

Patients are inquiring about mini-incision primary total hip arthroplasty with increasing frequency. There are no published randomized controlled trials to substantiate claims that the mini-incision direct lateral approach is better than a standard approach. The purpose of our study was to review our initial experience with the mini-incision technique through the direct lateral approach, with the intent of implementing a randomized controlled trial if the approach could be shown as safe and effective. Of importance was determining if there is any difference in component positioning and if there is any difference in intraoperative or postoperative complications between the two groups. We retrospectively compared a consecutive series of 87 primary total hip arthroplasties. Thirty-four total hip arthroplasties were done using a mini-incision direct lateral approach. The mean abduction angle was 45 degrees for both groups. The femoral stem alignment was within five degrees of neutral in 97% of the mini group and 94% of the standard group. There were no dislocations, infections, neurologic or wound complications. There were no differences in medical complications or blood transfusions. A significant decrease was found regarding body mass index, which reflects the bias in patient selection and lack of randomization. We conclude that it is safe to continue further study with this approach because as there was no increase in complications or component malpositioning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level III (retrospective comparative study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.