Outcome of lateral humeral condylar mass fractures in children associated with elbow dislocation or olecranon fracture

Kirschner wire vs screw osteosynthesis of lateral condyle fractures in paediatric patients: a systematic review

This systematic review compares Kirschner wires versus a single cannulated screw for the treatment of lateral humeral condyle fractures in children. The purpose of this review is to review the current literature on fixation of lateral condyle fractures of the humerus, and to ascertain whether there is a difference in clinical outcomes of these fractures when fixated with K-wires vs screws. This systematic review of the literature comparing surgical management of paediatric (0-17 years of age) lateral condyle fractures with K-wire versus screw fixation was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic searches of three databases from inception to March 2022 yielded 17 studies which satisfied inclusion criteria, comprising 1,272 patients with a median age of 8.5 years. Eight hundred and fifty-five (67.2%) patients underwent K-wire fixation and 417 (32.8%) underwent screw fixation. Results were divided into comparative and single-arm studies. The median follow-up time was 23.3 months (range 3 months-22 years). A lateral prominence was observed in 114 (13.3%) patients with K-wires and 41 (9.8%) patients with a cannulated screw. An infection developed in 52 (6.1%) patients with K-wires, while only five (1.2%) patients with a screw developed an infection. A carrying angle deformity occurred in 61 (7.1%) patients with K-wires and seven (1.7%) patients with a screw. K-wires and cannulated screws are effective and safe methods of fixation for lateral humeral condyle fractures in children. K-wire fixation may have a greater incidence of infection but allows for safe non-operative removal and versatility with fractures of greater comminution, while screw fixation necessitates a second operation for removal following union.Level of Evidence III Systematic review.

Management of Lateral Condyle Humeral Fracture Associated With Elbow Dislocation in Children. A Retrospective International Multicenter Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Lateral humeral condyle fractures account for 12% to 17% of all distal humerus fractures in children, and usually occur as an isolated injury or are associated with radial neck and/or proximal ulna fractures. The presentation with a concomitant dislocation of the elbow is rare. Therefore, literature on young patients with this uncommon combination is sparse and mostly limited to case reports and small case series. The aim of the present study is to identify the best treatment strategy for this injury, recognize potential risk factors for the development of complications, and identify predictors of outcome.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective review of electronic and written medical records for skeletally immature patients who were diagnosed with a lateral condyle fracture of the humerus associated with elbow dislocation (ED). Data recorded included patient demographics, fracture classification, direction of the dislocation, treatment strategy, time to union, elbow range of motion, complications, and additional procedures. The modified Flynn criteria were used to determine the outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 23 patients who presented to 3 institutions with a concomitant lateral humeral condyle fractures and an ED. The mean age at the time of injury was 8.7 years (range: 6 to 13 y). The median time from injury to surgery was 1 day (interquartile range: 0.5, minimum to maximum: 0 to 29 d). The median follow-up was 24 weeks (interquartile range: 16, minimum to maximum: 4 to 120 wk). The injury occurred more commonly in males (79%) with Weiss type 3 fractures. The direction of the dislocation was posterior or posteromedial in most cases. Open reduction through a modified Kocher lateral approach and fixation with either Kirschner wires (N = 12) or cannulated screws (N = 9) was the preferred method of treatment. Eight patients (34.8%) developed complications, including persistent elbow stiffness (N = 5), elbow instability (N = 1), and avascular necrosis (N = 2). There were no cases of delayed union, nonunion, malunion, heterotopic ossification, neurological injury, or hardware failure. Patients treated with casting or Kirschner wire fixation had a significantly increased rate of elbow stiffness compared with screw fixation (50%, 25%, and 11%, respectively, P = 0.015). According to Flynn's criteria, 65% of the patients had good or excellent outcomes, and 35% had poor.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study demonstrate a higher than previously described rate of complications in children with lateral condyle humerus fracture associated with ED, including persistent elbow stiffness, avascular necrosis, and chronic elbow instability, leading to unsatisfactory clinical outcomes in over one-third of the cases. Our findings suggest that the internal fixation with screws, combined with a shorter postoperative immobilization period (2 wk) may lead to improved clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic, case series.

Possible Mechanism and Treatment Results of Combined Pediatric Fractures of the Humeral Lateral Condyle and Ipsilateral Ulnar Olecranon

OBJECTIVE

Combined fractures of the lateral condyle of the humerus and the ipsilateral ulnar olecranon are rarely seen in children. Therefore, the mechanism and suitable treatments remain debatable. This study describes the possible mechanism of combined humeral lateral condyle and ipsilateral ulnar olecranon fractures and presents the treatment results.

METHODS

Children diagnosed with combined fractures of the humeral lateral condyle and ipsilateralulnar olecranon from July 2010 to July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Humeral lateral condyle fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with bioabsorbable pins. Ulnar olecranon fractures were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning with K-wires for Mayo type IA fractures and with tension-band wiring or a locking plate for Mayo type IIA fractures. The postoperative function and appearance of the elbow were evaluated using the Flynn criteria and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) at follow-up.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 19 patients aged from 4 to 11 years. Bony compression and avulsion by attached muscles and ligaments may be the leading factors causing the combined injuries, as the children fell with an outstretched and supinated elbow. The average follow-up time was 33 months. High MEPS of >90 indicated that good to excellent results were obtained without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposed a reasonable hypothesis for the mechanism of combined humeral lateral condyle and ipsilateral ulnar olecranon fractures in children. Satisfactory outcomes were achieved with bioabsorbable pins for lateral condyle fractures and closed reduction and percutaneous pinning with K-wires, tension-band wiring, or locking plate for olecranon fractures.

Unusual Combination of Lateral Condyle Mass Fracture and Olecranon Fracture in a Child: A Case Report

Fractures of the lateral condyle and olecranon are two of the most common elbow injuries in the pediatric age group. However, their simultaneous occurrence is rare. Proper understanding and management of these injuries are essential to prevent long-term complications. This case report presents a patient who suffered both fractures, with surgical intervention for the condyle and non-surgical management for the olecranon. A two-year-old female child was brought to the emergency department following a fall from monkey bars, landing on her outstretched left arm. Clinical examination showed a markedly swollen and tender elbow with a restricted range of motion. No neurovascular deficit was noted. Plain radiographs revealed a displaced fracture of the lateral condyle and an associated non-displaced olecranon fracture. Given the displacement of the lateral condyle fracture, surgical intervention was deemed necessary. The patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the lateral condyle using Kirschner wires. The olecranon fracture, being non-displaced, was managed conservatively with a posterior splint. The patient's postoperative recovery was uneventful. The Kirschner wires were removed at six weeks of follow-up, and active mobilization was started. The patient achieved full range of motion at three months post-injury. At a one-year follow-up, she had no pain, restriction, or any deformity, and radiographs confirmed the complete union of both fractures. Simultaneous fractures of the lateral condyle and olecranon in children are rare. The mechanism of injury is complex and warrants a high index of suspicion for associated injuries. Surgical fixation of the lateral condyle and conservative management of the olecranon fracture can yield excellent outcomes.

Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for treatment of unstable lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in children

Objective

In the past, obviously displaced lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in children were treated satisfactorily with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). However, in recent years, more studies have mentioned closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of these fractures.

Methods

In this retrospective investigation, the radiographic and clinical results of patients with these fractures that were initially managed with CRPP were newly classified. We classified these fractures into three groups according to the degree and pattern of fracture displacement as identified on four radiographic images. In Type I, the fracture is unstable and displacement is ≥2 mm; In Type II degree I, the fracture is unstable and displacement is >2 mm, with single rotation of fragment; In Type II degree II, the fracture is unstable and displacement is >2 mm, with single rotation of fragment, with rotation of fragment and antero-proximal displacement; In Type III, the fracture is unstable and displacement is >2 mm, with posterior dislocation of elbow joint. We also designed an algorithm for closed reduction of these fractures according to this new classification.

Results

We retrospectively analyzed the radiographic and clinical results of 37 unstable fractures (in 22 boys and 15 girls) that were treated with closed reduction. Twenty-one of 25 (84.0%) type I fractures, which could have been reduced to within 2 mm of residual displacement, were treated with closed reduction and pinning with 2 or 3 Kirschner wires (K wires). Three of 5 (60.0%) type II degree I, 3 of 4 (75.0%) type II degree II, and 3 of 3 (100%) type III fractures were treated with CRPP. In 4 of 25 (16.0%) type I, 2 of 5 (40.0%) type II degree I and 1 of 4 (25.0%) type II degree II fractures, closed reduction failed, so ORIF was implemented. There were no complications, such as nonunion, osteonecrosis of the capitellum, superficial or deep infection, malunion, cubitus varus or valgus, or early physeal arrest.

Conclusion

Although the management of type III fractures may not be more difficult than type II fractures with a rotated fracture fragment, as elbow dislocations are usually easy reducible. This retrospective study showed that type III fractures should not be ignored as a lateral condyle fracture that can be cured with CRPP and that lateral humeral condyle fractures with obvious displacement and rotation can be initially treated with CRPP to achieve satisfactory recovery of the elbow. Kirschner wire (K wire) fixation is recommended to avoid reoperation or anesthesia for hardware removal.

Extra-Articular Corrective Osteotomy for Malunion of Intra-Articular Fracture of the Elbow in a Child: A Case Report

Introduction

Malunion of intra-articular fracture of the elbow in children is uncommon and may be difficult to treat. Intra-articular corrective osteotomies are still not commonly performed in children, and the main reason is the concern regarding the risk of osteonecrosis. We present a case of extra-articular corrective osteotomy for malunion after open reduction and internal fixation for fracture dislocation of the elbow.

Case Report

An 8-year-old boy was injured by a fall and he underwent an operation the day after the injury with diagnosis of lateral condyle fracture of the right humerus. He was referred to our department 4 months after the operation due to restricted range of motion. His elbow exhibited cubitus varus, and range of motion was 80° of flexion, -30° of extension, 55° of pronation, and 85° of supination. Plain radiographs showed malunion, a Baumann angle of 3°, and a tilting angle of 5°. We diagnosed this injury not as lateral condyle fracture but as posterolateral dislocation with Milch type 1 lateral condyle fracture associated with osteochondral flap fracture of the coronoid process with computed tomography images at the time of injury. Because the patient was only 8 years old, we decided to perform an extra-articular corrective osteotomy to encourage bone remodeling and improve the flexion range of motion. After the operation, the range of motion improved as 130° of flexion, -30o of extension, 85o of pronation, and 90° of supination 4 years after the operation. Plain radiographs showed that the epiphysis of the capitellum was closed, and the trochlea presented a fishtail deformity.

Conclusion

We obtained relatively good outcomes with extra-articular corrective osteotomy, and long-term follow-up is necessary. Especially in the elbow, the injury itself may cause fishtail deformity due to avascular necrosis of the trochlea, and if an additional osteotomy is performed, the risk increases. Although there is concern about the occurrence of secondary osteoarthritis, we expect that the intra-articular deformity would be remodeled due to the patient's young age if normal elbow movement could be obtained.

Lateral Condyle Fracture of the Humerus Among Children Attending a Pediatric Emergency Department: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The lateral humeral condyle fractures in children accounts for one fifth of all elbow fractures. These fractures have a propensity to displace because of the pull of the extensor muscles on the condyle.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the epidemiology, injury patterns, complications, and predictors for conservative/surgical management in patients with lateral condyle humeral fractures between 0 and 18 years of age.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study conducted between January 2006 and December 2016.

RESULTS

There were 268 patients identified with lateral condyle elbow fracture. Majority of the patients (81.4%) with lateral condyle humeral fractures presented with either undisplaced or minimally displaced (<2 mm) fractures. The initial management in majority (90.7%) of the patients was conservative. Of the patients, 26.8% had secondary displacement at follow-up. The overall proportion of patients who required surgical intervention was 36.2%. Varus deformity of elbow (2.2%) and malunion (0.4%) were the complications noticed on long-term follow-up. Increased age and undisplaced fracture were statistically significant positive predictors for conservative management. The presence of concurrent elbow injuries and type of fracture (displaced >2 mm) were statistically significant positive predictors for surgical management.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that majority of the patients with lateral condyle humeral fractures had presented with either undisplaced or minimally displaced (<2 mm) fractures. The positive predictors for conservative management of fractures were increased age and undisplaced fracture. The positive predictors for surgical management of lateral condyle humerus fractures were concurrent injuries in elbow and type of fracture (displaced >2 mm). Physician vigilance to the possibility of additional migration of lateral condyle fractures initially managed conservatively, and the need for subsequent surgical stabilization plays an important role in the management of these fractures.

Accuracy of MRI and X-Ray Measurement of Displacement Distance of Humeral Lateral Condyle Fractures

Objective

To investigate the accuracy of X‐ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements in evaluating the displacement of humeral lateral condyle fracture (HLCF) in different positions of the forearm based on human cadaveric HLCF models.

Methods

Three human cadaveric elbow HLCF fracture models were successfully established. The wrist joint was fixed, and the forearm was rotated forward along the mid‐axis. The maximum distance between the two segments of the lateral fracture gap was defined as LFS (lateral fracture space) distance, and the maximum distance between the two segments of the fracture gap at the anterior and posterior margins of the fracture model was defined as PFS (posterior fracture space). The LFS and PFS distances of the human cadaveric elbow HLCF fracture models were measured during forearm rotation at 0º, 45º, 90º, and 135º rotation using a Capture Motion System (CMS), positive and lateral elbow X‐ray, coronal and sagittal MRI scans, respectively, and the CMS measurements were considered as the true fracture gap distances. The values obtained by CMS, X‐ray, and MRI measurements for both LPS and PFS distances in the HLCF fracture model at each position during rotation were recorded. The LFS and PFS distances were measured by two independent orthopaedic and joint imaging physicians. The data were measured three times by each physician, and the final values were the average of the two measurements. The outcomes were determined by whether a statistical difference exists in the LFS and PFS among the CMS, X‐ray, and MRI groups.

Results

The interobserver agreement tests between the two observers showed good agreement in the measurements. A multiple sample ANOVA showed statistical differences in the LFS distances of HLCF measured at 0º, 45º, 90º, and 135º rotated by three radiographic measurements (P < 0.05). The LFS distances obtained by MRI and CMS measurements were greater than those obtained by X‐ray measurement in all positions using the LSD test (P < 0.05), and no statistical difference was found between the CMS and MRI methods in each position (P > 0.05). The same results were observed in terms of PFS values obtained by CMS, X‐ray, and MRI measurements at 0º, 45º, 90º, and 135º pronation. It was statistically different among the three groups as shown by multiple sample ANOVA (P < 0.05). The CMS and MRI measurements were greater than the X‐ray measurements (P < 0.05), while no statistical difference was observed between the CMS and MRI measurements (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

X‐rays often underestimate the degree of displacement of HLCF fractures; MRI measurements are closer to the true values compared with X‐ray.

Paediatric lateral condyle fracture with a posterolateral elbow dislocation: an atypical injury in a preadolescent

Paediatric lateral condyle fractures of the distal humerus are common but a concomitant elbow dislocation is rare. Typically, paediatric orthopaedic surgeons will treat lateral condyle fractures with pin or metaphyseal single-screw fixation and supplementary immobilisation for several weeks. These techniques sacrifice the early stability and mobilisation necessary to avoid stiffness after a complex elbow fracture-dislocation. We present an 11-year-old boy who sustained a traumatic posterolateral elbow dislocation with lateral condyle and coronoid fractures. Due to advanced skeletal age, both paediatric and adult treatment principles were applied to this rare injury. After initial closed reduction, open reduction and internal fixation of the distal humerus lateral condyle with divergent partially threaded compression screws was performed. Motion was initiated in 2 weeks and the patient regained almost full motion by 3 months. At 1.5-year follow-up, the affected limb carrying angle was unaffected and the patient had no functional limitations.

Complex paediatric fracture dislocation of the elbow - A rare case report

Traumatic elbow dislocation with concomitant fractures of the lateral condyle and the medial epicondyle in the paediatric population is an extremely rare injury. We are reporting a case of a locked fracture-dislocation of the elbow in an 11-year-old girl. The dislocation was treated by open reduction and the lateral condyle was surgically fixed. There are only seven similar cases described in the literature. This is the only reported case where the elbow dislocation was locked, requiring an open reduction.

Complications and functional outcomes after transolecranon distal humerus fracture

BACKGROUND

Transolecranon distal humerus fractures are uncommon injuries. This is the first multipatient case series to describe outcomes and complications following transolecranon distal humerus fractures in the adult population.

METHOD

Design: retrospective; setting: single level 1 trauma center; patients/participants: 16 patients; intervention: surgical management of transolecranon distal humerus fracture; main outcome measurement: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire after a minimum of 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients with open (n = 12) or closed (n = 4) transolecranon distal humerus fractures were identified. Nine female and 7 male patients with a mean age of 47 years were included. Mechanisms of injury included motor vehicle collisions (n = 3), motorcycle crashes (n = 4), ground-level falls (n = 3), falls from height (n = 4), train collision (n = 1), and an industrial accident (n = 1). Seven patients (44%) presented with nerve injury. Patients underwent open reduction with internal fixation (n = 15), external fixation (n = 6), or both (n = 5). Additional surgeries were ultimately required in 11 patients (69%), with a mean of 3 surgeries to manage each patient's elbow injuries. All patients returned for at least 3 clinical follow-up visits; mean clinical follow-up was 15.8 months and mean radiographic follow-up was 12.3 months. Complications were observed in 15 patients (94%). Eleven patients (69%) had limited range of motion with a flexion arc of less than 100° at their last clinic visit. Seven patients (44%) developed deep wound infections requiring repeat débridement and intravenous antibiotics. Implant removal was performed in 10 patients (62.5%) because of infection (n = 5), symptomatic hardware (n = 4), or device failure (n = 1). Heterotopic ossification was seen in 8 patients (50%) and post-traumatic arthrosis in 4 (25%). Two patients (12.5%) required flap reconstruction for soft tissue defects. Nonunion occurred in 7 patients (44%). DASH scores were obtained for 10 patients (62.5%) at a mean of 3.8 years after injury. The mean DASH score was 40.2, ranging from 4.2 to 76.5. Among respondents, 7 (70%) were able to resume working, with an average DASH work module score of 25.

CONCLUSION

Management of transolecranon distal humerus fractures remain a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Complication rates, including deep infection and nonunion, are high, with frequent long-term functional limitations posed to the patient, as evidenced by DASH scores.

Combined lateral condyle mass and olecranon fractures: A proposed treatment algorithm and surgical technique

Combined lateral condyle mass and olecranon fractures are infrequently seen. These cases are easily missed, and only 12 previous cases are detailed in the English medical literature. The decision for surgical fixation usually depends on the amount of displacement of the individual fractures. However, the optimal surgical approach or technique for open reduction and internal fixation has not been agreed upon. We present three original case reports and analyse them together with all other known cases in the English literature. We discuss how to avoid missing these combined fractures and propose a treatment algorithm based on the different permutations of the fracture displacement. Our detailed surgical approach (using a posterior 'olecranon osteotomy' approach) is also described.

Chronic Ulnohumeral Subluxation After Surgical Treatment of Lateral Condylar Fracture Dislocation of the Elbow in a Child: A Case Report

CASE

A 10-year-old boy presented with chronic ulnohumeral subluxation 6 months after an open reduction of a Milch type II lateral condyle fracture subluxation performed at another hospital. The patient had persistent elbow pain and limited range of motion (ROM) between 20° and 50°. After the open reduction for chronic ulnohumeral subluxation and corrective osteotomy for articular surface reconstruction, he had an uneventful recovery with improved ROM of the affected elbow and no pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular corrective osteotomy for articular surface reconstruction may be feasible to improve mobility and relieve pain in pediatric patients with lateral condylar malunion and elbow subluxation.

Replacement or repair of terrible triad of the elbow: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment for terrible triad injuries remains a challenging clinical problem, and controversy exists of whether it is better to repair or replace the radial head. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of repair and arthroplasty replacement of the radial head in patients with terrible triad injury.

METHODS

Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched up to July 30, 2018 to identify the relevant studies, which included patients who had received treatments of the terrible triad of the elbow and also had reported with the quantitative outcomes. Outcomes of interest were functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Four studies with a total of 115 patients were included in the systematic review. Most patients were type II or III radial head fractures based on the Mason classification systems. Fifty-one patients received radial head repair surgery and 64 underwent replacement. Two studies had indicated that patients in the replacement group were significantly associated with better treatment outcome assessed by DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and MEPS (Mayo Elbow Performance Score) scores. The meta-analysis indicated that patients with the arthroplasty replacement were associated with significantly better ROM outcomes in flexion, extension, pronation than those with radial head repaired. In addition, patients in the replacement group showed fewer post-surgery complications than those in the repair group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review had indicated that patients with terrible triad injuries undergo arthroplasty replacement have better clinical outcomes and fewer post-surgery complications than those received the repair surgery. Radial head replacement might be a more effective treatment approach with good clinical outcomes for patients with a terrible triad of the elbow.

[Fracture of the medial and lateral epicondyle associated with elbow dislocation in children (about a case)]

La luxation du coude est une lésion relativement rare chez l’enfant. Elle représente 3 a 6% des traumatismes du coude, On constate souvent des fractures associées à cette luxation, ce sont le plus souvent des fractures de l’épicondyle médial, l’association d’une fracture de l’épicondyle latéral et médial à la fois à une luxation reste exceptionnelle. Nous rapportons le cas d’un enfant âgé de 13 ans victime d’un traumatisme du coude gauche par un mécanisme indirect. L’examen locomoteur a objectivé un coude gauche tuméfié, déformé avec une impotence fonctionnelle totale. La radiographie a mis en évidence une luxation posteroexterne du coude associée à une fracture de l’épicondyle latéral et de l’épicondyle médial qui se trouve incarcéré en intra articulaire. La prise en charge a consisté en une réduction de la luxation sous anesthésie, avec un contrôle scopique objectivant une bonne réduction, une fracture de l’épicondyle latéral jugée stade 1 selon la classification de Lagrange et Rigault après réduction et une fracture de l’épicondyle médial stade 2 selon la classification de Watson-Jones, d’où la décision d’opérer cette dernière, avec un abord postéromédial du coude. Le contrôle radiologique post opératoire immédiat et à distance jugé satisfaisant avec une ablation de l’attelle faite à 3 semaines, et une ablation de matériel d’ostéosynthèse faite à 6 semaines, une rééducation du coude était prescrite, avec un bon résultat clinique.

Posteromedial elbow dislocation with lateral humeral condylar fracture in children: Three case reports and a literature review

RATIONALE

Posteromedial dislocations of the elbow with lateral humeral condylar fractures (LCFs) are uncommon, and only isolated cases have been reported in the English-language literature. Because of the complex radiolucent cartilaginous structures and late-appearing ossification centers, radiological diagnosis of elbow dislocations with LCF in children is challenging.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report three children with posteromedial elbow dislocation: two patients with Milch type I and one patient with Milch type II LCF.

DIAGNOSES

In our report, radiographs showed only a small bone fragment, and arthrography or computed tomography were helpful diagnostic aids in cases 1 and 3. In contrast, the patient in case 2 was initially misdiagnosed as having an epiphyseal separation of the distal humerus, and open reduction and internal fixation through the posterior approach revealed Milch type II LCF.

INTERVENTIONS

In case 1 and 3, Milch type I LCFs, open reduction and internal fixation was performed through the posterolateral approach. On the other hand, in case 2, Milch type II LCF, open reduction and internal fixation was performed through the posterior approach.

OUTCOMES

Poor reduction of Milch type I LCFs resulted in incongruity of the articular surface and poor cosmetic results in two patients. In case 2, Milch type II LCF, plain radiographs showed adequate healing without elbow deformity and the clinical result was excellent.

LESSONS

Because LCFs are intra-articular fractures, anatomical reduction is crucial for satisfactory outcomes. We promote awareness of this injury, especially posteromedial dislocation with Milch type I LCF. Preoperative evaluation is helpful for achieving satisfactory outcomes, and open reduction and internal fixation through an anterolateral approach might be most appropriate for Milch type I LCFs.

Paediatric lateral condyle fractures: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Lateral condyle fractures of the humerus are common paediatric fractures. However, no conclusive statement has been made about their risk of complications, the management and epidemiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies with paediatric lateral condyle fracture were included, with 2440 children.

RESULTS

Most fractures had union, with 0.9% delayed union, 1.6% non-union and 1.5% malunion. Complications included valgus deformities (6.1%), varus deformities (7.8%), flexion loss (9.7%), extension loss (11.5%), prominent lateral condyle (27.3%), fishtail deformity (14.3%), avascular necrosis (1.7%), premature epiphyseal closure (5.4%) and neurological deficits (10.6%). Risk factors of complications include concomitant ipsilateral upper limb fractures, classification by Milch or Jakob, fracture displacement, fixation device, and inappropriate diagnosis and management.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended for fractures that are non-displaced on all radiographic views to be managed conservatively, while displaced fractures of > 2 mm requires surgical intervention. Minimally displaced fractures could be treated conservatively, though follow-up is recommended to detect displacement. Radiographs are also recommended at 1-week follow-up, with serial radiographs having no clinical significance. Kirschner wires or lag screws could be employed, and it is recommended that the Kirschner wires be left exposed and removed when there is clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture consolidation, typically at the 6-week interval. These fractures need close follow-up.

Malunited lateral condyle fracture of humerus with elbow dislocation: a diagnostic dilemma

Fracture of lateral condyle with dislocation of the elbow joint is rare in pediatric age. Diagnosis and management of these injuries could be a challenge. Delayed presentation of such injuries could be mistaken for a malunited supracondylar fracture of the humerus and treatment of these injuries remains controversial. We present 2 such cases, where the diagnosis of dislocation of elbow was missed at initial presentation and caused diagnostic confusion at late presentation. The problems faced in the diagnosis of these injuries and the management of late presenting cases are discussed.

Diagnosis, management and complications of distal humerus lateral condyle fractures in children

We review the diagnosis, evaluation and management of paediatric lateral condylar fractures. The complications of these fractures are also discussed, including the management of fracture non-union.

Use of Ganga Hospital Open Injury Severity Scoring for determination of salvage versus amputation in open type IIIB injuries of lower limbs in children-An analysis of 52 type IIIB open fractures

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Open injuries in children are rare compared to adults. In children with major open injuries, there is no specific scoring system to guide when to amputate or salvage the limb. The use of available adult scoring systems may lead to errors in management. The role of Ganga Hospital Open Injury Severity Scoring (GHOISS) for open injuries in adults is well established and its applicability for pediatric open injuries has not been studied. This study was done to analyse the usefulness of GHOISS in pediatric open injuries and to compare it with MESS(Mangled Extremity Severity Score).

METHODS

All children (0-18 years) who were admitted with Open type IIIB injuries of lower limbs between January 2008 and March 2015 were included. MESS and GHOISS were calculated for all the patients. There were 50 children with 52 type IIIB Open injuries of which 39 had open tibial fractures and 13 had open femur fractures.

RESULTS

Out of 52 type IIIB open injuries, 48 were salvaged and 4 were amputated. A MESS score of 7 and above had sensitivity of 25% for amputation while GHOISS of 17 and above was found to be more accurate for determining amputation with sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 93.75%.

CONCLUSION

GHOISS is a reliable predictor of injury severity in type IIIB open fractures in children and can be used as a guide for decision-making. The use of MESS score in children has a lower predictive value compared to GHOISS in deciding amputation versus salvage. A GHOISS of 17 or more has the highest sensitivity and specificity to predict amputation.

Concurrent Lateral Condyle Mass Fracture With Olecranon Fracture: A Case Report and Brief Review of Literature

INTRODUCTION

There is very limited literature describing the association of lateral condyle mass (LCM) fracture of the distal humerus associated concurrently with olecranon fracture. Herein, a case is reported of a displaced LCM fracture with displaced olecranon fracture, due to complex trauma while getting out of a vehicle, which was managed by open reduction and internal fixation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 4.5- year- old boy suffered severe pain and swelling around his right elbow due to trauma which he suffered while trying to get out of a vehicle which was in motion. Plain radiographs of the anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique views showed a displaced lateral mass fracture associated with a displaced olecranon fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation was carried out and near normal function was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the paucity of literature and rare incidence of this injury, this case report highlights the need to be aware of other injuries which can occur in association with LCM fractures in children.

Anatomy, definition, and treatment of the "terrible triad of the elbow" and contemplation of the rationality of this designation

In the realm of orthopaedics, the terrible triad of the elbow is infamous, not simply because the prognosis is poor for most patients, but also, maybe to a greater extent, because the unique name of this malady attracts considerable attention and interest in both doctors and patients. The adjective terrible is bestowed on an elbow triad that comprises three coexisting complicated traumas; namely, radial head and ulnar coronoid process fractures and posterior dislocation of the elbow joint. In this review, the classification, treatment principles and prognosis for different forms of management of the radial head and ulnar coronoid process fractures and the ligaments lesions are introduced sequentially and various surgical procedures and their efficacy are discussed. This triad has long given orthopedic surgeons headaches. Nonetheless, in recent years a series of anatomical mechanical studies on the elbow joint have been published and there have been several breakthroughs in surgical techniques for managing this elbow triad. This review examines some memorable millstones and unveils trends in the current clinical norm for this triad. The accomplishments achieved recently have reportedly resulted in enhanced prognoses in the last two or three years compared with previous years. It is therefore high time to revise our thoughts about the justice and accuracy of defining this triad of the elbow as terrible. Lastly, we may safely conclude that the terrible triad of the elbow is much less terrible than previously, provided the commonly approved clinical approaches are undertaken.

Elbow dislocation with an associated lateral condyle fracture of the humerus: a rare occurrence in the pediatric population

BACKGROUND

In the pediatric population, reports of a concomitant lateral condyle fracture (LCF) of the humerus and an elbow dislocation are rare.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2013, we identified a group of 12 children who presented to our institution with a concomitant LCF and an elbow dislocation. This subset of fractures (group 1), all of which were managed surgically, is the subject of the present report. Their outcome was compared with that of all LCFs that were treated surgically at our institution during the study period (group 2, n=179). The length of surgery, recovery of range of motion (ROM), lateral spur formation, and the presence or absence of neurological or vascular complications, pin-tract infection, loss of fixation, and avascular necrosis or nonunion of the lateral condyle were used to describe the outcome of the fracture.

RESULTS

A concomitant elbow dislocation and LCF of the humerus was observed in 12 patients with a mean age of 5.5 years (range, 2 to 8), and a mean follow-up of 51 weeks. A posteromedial dislocation of the elbow was observed in most patients. The recovery of ROM appeared to be slower for patients with an associated elbow dislocation, but a full recovery of ROM was obtained in the long term. Lateral spur formation was seen in all fractures in group 1 and only in 72% of fractures in group 2 (P=0.02). A satisfactory outcome was observed in 92% of fractures in group 1 and in 88% of fractures in group 2 (P=0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant LCF of the humerus and an elbow dislocation are rare. Satisfactory outcomes can be expected when prompt reduction of the elbow dislocation and timely anatomic reduction and fixation of the fracture is obtained. A delayed recovery of elbow motion is common among this population, but a full recovery of ROM can be expected in the long term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-retrospective.

Radial head and neck injuries in children with elbow dislocations: a report of three cases

In children, traumatic elbow dislocations usually occur after the epiphysis has closed and with associated radial head and neck fractures and osteochondral fragments. The fragments are also usually interposed in the joint restricting complete congruent joint motion. We report on 3 children with traumatic elbow fracture-dislocation with associated radial head and neck injuries treated with open reduction and stabilisation. All patients achieved good outcomes and returned to pre-injury level of activities.

Comparison of Kirschner wires and AO cannulated screw internal fixation for displaced lateral humeral condyle fracture in children

PURPOSE

This retrospective study compares Kirschner wires versus 3.5-mm diameter AO cannulated screw internal fixation in treatment for the displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures.

METHODS

The study included 62 patients (42 boys, 20 girls; mean age 6.93 years; age range two to 14 years) with displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures. All patients were treated by open reduction and Kirschner wires or cannulated screw fixation. The clinical outcomes were evaluated according to the criteria of Hardacre et al. The mean follow-up period was 39.4 months (range 21-95 months).

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcome between these two groups (P > 0.05). Five patients (16.7%) developed skin infection around K-wires, while no infection occurred in fracture with screws. An obvious lateral prominence occurred in 11 (36.7%) patients with K-wires and four (12.5%) patients with screws. Nine (30%) patients with K-wires and two (6.3%) patients with screws had a lack of 10° of extension of the elbow compared with the other side.

CONCLUSION

Both K-wires and cannulated screw fixation are effective in treatment for displaced lateral humeral condyle fracture. K-wires can pass through the ossific nucleus of capitulum without damaging it, but a longer period of external fixation and local skin care will be required. The screws can reduce the possibility of lateral prominence and promote the function of elbow by continuously stabilising the fracture, but a second operation is need for screw removal.

Distal humerus lateral condyle fracture in children: when is the conservative treatment a valid option?

INTRODUCTION

Distal humerus condyle fracture in children is rare. These fractures often mislead the emergency physician or surgeon. However, treatment adapted to the degree of displacement achieves excellent clinical and radiographic results. The objective of this study was to clarify indications for conservative treatment of lateral humeral condyle fracture in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two children who had sustained lateral humeral condyle fracture between January 2007 and January 2010 were reviewed in April 2010. At this consultation, the children underwent clinical and radiological examination. The Hardacre functional score was used to determine objective clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Conservative treatment was exclusive to cases of lateral condyle displacement equal to or less than 1mm. All other fractures were managed by surgical open reduction and fixation using cross-pinning. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical or radiological outcome between conservative and surgical management.

DISCUSSION

Lateral humeral condyle fracture is difficult to diagnose in children. The majority of poor results reported in literature relate to inadequate initial treatment. Given a radiological aspect of hemarthrosis of the elbow, the emergency physician prescribes multiple X-ray views of the affected elbow (anteroposterior, lateral and internal oblique). The clinical aspect of lateral humeral condyle fracture is often characteristic (ecchymosis facing the head of the radius). Nondisplaced or minimally displaced lateral humeral condyle fracture can be managed conservatively under close survey. However, secondary displacement under the cast is often difficult or impossible to detect, and outpatient surgery is therefore being increasingly indicated in our department.

Outcomes after terrible triads of the elbow treated with the current surgical protocols. A review

Dislocation of the elbow associated with radial head and coronoid fracture, the so-called "terrible triad" of the elbow, is challenging to treat and has a history of complicated outcomes. However, advances in the knowledge of elbow kinematics combined with improved implants and surgical techniques during the past few years have led to the development of standard surgical protocols. This review article analyses the results in 137 elbow triad injuries of five studies treated using the current protocols. These include fixation of the coronoid fracture, repair or replacement the radial head, and repair of the lateral ligament complex, reserving medial collateral ligament repair and application of hinged external fixation for patients with residual instability. Treatment of these demanding injuries appeared effective in the majority of cases, i.e. with an average of 31 months of follow-up, overall flexion arc was 111.4°, averaged flexion was 132.5° with forearm rotation of 135.5°, Mayo elbow performance score was 85.6 points, and Broberg-Morrey score was 85 points. Nevertheless, the patient should be informed about the incidence of complications including joint stiffness, ulnar nerve symptoms or post-traumatic arthritis.