Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures: are results reproducible?

3D printing assisted MIPO for treatment of complex middle-proximal humeral shaft fractures

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to explore the clinical efficacy of 3-dimensional (3D) printing assisted minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique by comparing the clinical outcomes with traditional open reduction and internal plating fixation (ORIF) for treating complex middle-proximal humerus fractures (AO 12C fracture type).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 42 participants who received a complicated middle-proximal humerus fracture from the beginning of 2018 to the end of 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were assigned to two groups: MIPO with detailed preoperative planning assisted by 3D printing technique (MIPO group), and traditional ORIF (ORIF group).

RESULTS

This study included 21 patients in the ORIF group and 21 patients in the MIPO group. All patients were followed-up for at least one year (mean: 16.12 ± 4.13 months), and no difference was observed in the range of shoulder joint motion (ROM), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores and Constant scores between the two groups. However, the occurrence of complications (surgical incision site infection, implant loosening, bone nonunion and radial nerve palsy) in ORIF group was remarkably higher compared to the MIPO group. All the cases achieved bone union within the MIPO group. Significant differences were found in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss and fracture healing time between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative 3D printing assisted MIPO technique exhibits obvious advantages in high operational efficiency and low occurrence of complications, which is worthy of clinical application for treating complex middle-proximal humeral shaft fractures.

Lateral minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with long PHILOS for proximal metaphyseal-diaphyseal humeral fracture: surgical techniques and a clinical series

The minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for proximal metaphyseal-diaphyseal humeral fracture is an effective alternative treatment with satisfactory outcomes. In this study, we described the surgical techniques and clinical results using MIPO via a lateral approach and long PHILOS plate fixation in 23 patients. All fractures were successfully united within a mean union time of 13.5 weeks (range 9-18). There was no iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. The deltoid power was grade 5 in all patients, except for 2 patients who had associated brachial plexus injury and gunshot injury at the deltoid muscle. The mean Constant-Murley score was 85.6 (range 16-98) and DASH score was 12.1 (range 1.7-85). Based on these findings, the lateral MIPO with long PHILOS plate fixation could be an alternative for the proximal metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures of the humeral shaft.

[Therapy of Humeral Shaft Fractures]

Humeral shaft fractures are a rare but challenging entity of injuries of the upper extremity. Despite all advances in the past decades - including improved imaging, adjusted surgical techniques and new implant designs - the treatment of humeral shaft fractures and especially the treatment choice remains challenging. Treatment options need to be evaluated individually under consideration of fracture morphology, soft tissue and potential neurological damage as well as patient-specific factors (i.e., age, comorbidities). Moreover, the risk of common complications such as radial nerve palsy, infection, non-union and malrotation needs to be evaluated in order to facilitate the best possible therapy for each patient. The regular available treatment options include conservative (cast, brace, etc.) and surgical measures (ante- and retrograde nailing, angle-stable plate osteosynthesis). Furthermore, (temporary) external fixation remains an option in emergency and complicative cases. However, none of the aforementioned options have proven a superior gold standard. This review evaluates the currently available treatment options and their individual advantages as well as the probability of possible complications and is aiming to supply a guide for individual treatment choice.

Humeral shaft fracture: systematic review of non-operative and operative treatment

INTRODUCTION

Humeral shaft fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively. The optimal management is subject to debate. The aim was to compare non-operative and operative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture in terms of fracture healing, complications, and functional outcome.

METHODS

Databases of Embase, Medline ALL, Web-of-Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were systematically searched for publications reporting clinical and functional outcomes of humeral shaft fractures after non-operative treatment with a functional brace or operative treatment by intramedullary nailing (IMN; antegrade or retrograde) or plate osteosynthesis (open plating or minimally invasive). A pooled analysis of the results was performed using MedCalc.

RESULTS

A total of 173 studies, describing 11,868 patients, were included. The fracture healing rate for the non-operative group was 89% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84-92%), 94% (95% CI 92-95%) for the IMN group and 96% (95% CI 95-97%) for the plating group. The rate of secondary radial nerve palsies was 1% in patients treated non-operatively, 3% in the IMN, and 6% in the plating group. Intraoperative complications and implant failures occurred more frequently in the IMN group than in the plating group. The DASH score was the lowest (7/100; 95% CI 1-13) in the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis group. The Constant-Murley and UCLA shoulder score were the highest [93/100 (95% CI 92-95) and 33/35 (95% CI 32-33), respectively] in the plating group.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that even though all treatment modalities result in satisfactory outcomes, operative treatment is associated with the most favorable results. Disregarding secondary radial nerve palsy, specifically plate osteosynthesis seems to result in the highest fracture healing rates, least complications, and best functional outcomes compared with the other treatment modalities.

Treating multifocal humerus fractures: A comparison between the mipo technique and intramedullary nailing

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Proximal humerus fractures with metaphysodiaphyseal extension represent a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon due to their reduced incidence and the difficulty in the treatment decision. These can be treated with an intramedullary nail or using the MIPO technique, associating different advantages and complications depending on the procedure. The objective of this study was to compare metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with antegrade intramedullary nailing and those operated using the MIPO technique to see if there were significant differences in terms of functional, clinical, and radiological results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

retrospective, analytical and unicentric review of 29 patients with proximal fracture with metaphyseal-diaphyseal extension treated by MIPO technique and 33 patients surgically treated by antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) in our hospital from 2014 to 2020. Demographic, functional, radiographic and clinical data were obtained..

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between both groups in terms of fracture mechanism (p=0.34), fracture type (p=0.13) or Maresca classification (p=0.32). Surgical time was significantly shorter in the IMN group compared to the MIPO technique (p=0.014). No significant difference was observed regarding the need for blood transfusion (p=0.32). The mean consolidation in the MIPO group was 21 weeks compared to 21 weeks in the IMN, with no significant differences between both groups (p= 0.88). No significant differences were observed between CONSTANT test at one year in the MIPO group versus the IMN group (p=0.79), nor in radial nerve palsies (p=0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal fractures with metaphyseal-diaphyseal extension are a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon due to the infrequency, the complexity of these fractures and the fact that there is no established consensus on the ideal treatment for this type of injury. Both the MIPO technique with the Philos plate and the intramedullary nail are valid options for the treatment of these fractures, with no differences observed in terms of fracture consolidation time or in terms of functional results.

Minimal invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) in humeral shaft fractures

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the radiological and functional results of humeral shaft fractures treated with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) in our clinic. Materials and Methods: Data of 21 humeral shaft fractures of 20 patients treated with MIPPO were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, type of injury, fracture classification according to AO classification and fracture location, smoking, radial nerve injury were recorded. Radiographically, the union at 6th month and alignment were evaluated. Objective results were evaluated in terms of shoulder and elbow range of motion. Subjective results were assessed by the American Shoulder and Elbow Society Score (ASES), University of California, Los Angles (UCLA) score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), the Disability of The Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score and Constant Shoulder Score. Results: The average elbow motion was 131.4° ± 19.8°. The mean ASES and UCLA scores were 88.5 ± 16.4 and 32.1 ± 5.2, respectively. The mean MEPI and DASH scores were 93.1 ± 11.3 and 11.8 ± 20.0, respectively, and the Constant score was mean 9.1 ± 15.3. Nonunion was observed in two patient at 6th month. Conclusion: We believe that MIPPO is a successful technique for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures with minimal soft tissue damage, intact shoulder and elbow motion function.

MIPO helical pre-contoured plates in diaphyseal humeral fractures with proximal extension. Surgical technique and results

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of applying the MIPO technique with a helical-shaped plate in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures with proximal extension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present an observational prospective study of patients with a humeral shaft fracture involving the proximal humerus fixed with a long proximal humerus polyaxial locking plate with an anterior curvature and helical shape (ALPS® Zimmerbiomet, Warsaw, Indianapolis, USA), using a MIPO technique. Between January 2017 and July 2020, 15 patients were treated at our institution. Proximally a 4-5 cm anterolateral transdeltoid approach was made. And distally, a 5-7 cm incision was made 4 cm proximal to the elbow crease. At each follow-up, radiographs were taken to evaluate fracture healing. Funtional scales were applied to evaluate clinical results.

RESULTS

Ten women and five men were included, with a mean age of 62 yo (range 26-86). All but one fracture healed uneventfully. The mean time to union was 28 weeks (range 12-48 weeks). Two out of 15 patients presented complications (an atrophic nonunion and a peri‑implant distal fracture). None of the patients had a nerve palsy prior neither after the surgery. No other complications, including infection, were registered during follow-up. Shoulder range of motion showed the following means: abduction of 147° (range 50°-180°), anterior flexion of 144° (range 80°-180°), external rotation of 77,5 ° (range 70°-80°) and internal rotation of 54.5° (range 45°-60°). All patients recovered their pre-fracture elbow range of motion. All patients presented less than 10° of angular deviation in varus/valgus or ante/recurvatum after the surgical procedure. At the end of the follow-up, all final functional scores were "good" or "excellent": mean Constant-Murley score was 72 ± 13 (range 38-91), ASES score was 73 ± 12 (range 41-88), UCLA shoulder scale was 30 ± 3,5 (range 10-35), and Q-DASH score was 16.5 ± 0,11 (range 4-57).

CONCLUSION

When applied correctly, the treatment of diaphyseal humeral fractures involving the proximal humerus using a polyaxial locking helical plate with a MIPO technique is a reliable treatment method. It has high union rates with low complications.

Is Bridge Plating of Comminuted Humeral Shaft Fractures Advantageous When Using Compression Plates with Three versus Two Screws per Fragment? A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

Background

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) is one of the generally accepted surgical techniques for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. However, despite the high bone union rate, a variety of complications are still prevailing. Moreover, the current literature lacks data comparing the anterolateral MIPO approach using dynamic compression plates accommodating different numbers of screws. The aim of this study was to analyze the biomechanical performance of comminuted humeral shaft fractures fixed with dynamic compression plates using either two or three screws per fragment.

Methods

Six pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric humeri from donors aged 66.8 ± 5.2 years were randomized to two paired study groups for simulation of bridge-plated comminuted shaft fracture type AO/OTA 12-C1/2/3 without interfragmentary bony support, using a dynamic compression plate positioned on the anterolateral surface and fixed with two (group 1) or three (group 2) screws per fragment. All specimens underwent nondestructive quasistatic biomechanical testing under lateral bending, anterior bending, axial bending, and torsion in internal rotation, followed by progressively increasing cyclic torsional loading in internal rotation until failure.

Results

Initial stiffness of the plated specimens in lateral bending, anterior bending, axial bending, and torsion was not significantly different between the groups (P ≥ 0.22). However, cycles to 10°, 15°, and 20° torsional deformation and cycles to construct failure were significantly higher in group 2 compared with group 1 (P ≤ 0.03).

Conclusions

From a biomechanical perspective, no significant superiority is identified in terms of primary stability when using two or three screws per fragment for bridge compression plating of comminuted humeral shaft fractures. However, three-screw configurations provide better secondary stability and maintain it with a higher resistance towards loss of reduction under dynamic loading. Therefore, the use of a third screw may be justified when such better secondary stability is required.

Radial nerve palsy associated with closed humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review of 1758 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Humeral shaft fractures are often associated with radial nerve palsy (RNP) (8-16%). The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess the incidence of primary and secondary RNP in closed humeral shaft fractures. The secondary aim was to compare the recovery rate of primary RNP and the incidence of secondary RNP between operative and non-operative treatment.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in 'Trip Database', 'Embase' and 'PubMed' to identify original studies reporting on RNP in closed humeral shaft fractures. The Coleman Methodology Score was used to grade the quality of the studies. The incidence and recovery of RNP, fracture characteristics and treatment characteristics were extracted. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to compare operative versus non-operative treatment.

RESULTS

Forty studies reporting on 1758 patients with closed humeral shaft fractures were included. The incidence of primary RNP was 10%. There was no difference in the recovery rate of primary RNP when comparing operative treatment with radial nerve exploration (98%) versus non-operative treatment (91%) (p = 0.29). The incidence of secondary RNP after operative and non-operative treatment was 4% and 0.4%, respectively (p < 0.01).

INTERPRETATION

One-in-ten patients with a closed humeral shaft fracture has an associated primary RNP, of which > 90% recovers without the need of (re-)intervention. No beneficial effect of early exploration on the recovery of primary RNP could be demonstrated when comparing patients managed non-operatively with those explored early. Patients managed operatively for closed humeral shaft fractures have a higher risk of developing secondary RNP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Systematic Review.

Comparison between osteosynthesis with interlocking nail and minimally invasive plating for proximal- and middle-thirds of humeral shaft fractures

PURPOSE

Options for the treatment of proximal- and middle-thirds of humeral shaft fractures include intramedullary interlocking nail (IMN) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO). However, whether IMN provides better clinical outcomes than MIPO surgical technique still remains unclear. This study was designed to compare clinical outcomes of the IMN with MIPO technique for the treatment of proximal- and middle-thirds of humeral shaft fractures.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort analysis of 55 proximal- and middle-thirds of humeral shaft fractures surgically treated using IMN (n = 25) or MIPO (n = 30) from January 2012 to January 2016. Peri-operative and follow-up data (a minimum of 1 year) of the patients (aged from 18 to 56 years) were collected. Operative time, union time, VAS scores, surgery-related complications, and implant removal rate were compared between the two groups in this study. Besides, the functional outcomes were evaluated using the Rating Scale of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' Form (ASES) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score System (MEPS).

RESULT

We found significantly shorter operative time and much less blood loss in IMN group, and lower VAS scores in the IMN group after surgery at first and third months but not at the sixth month. Complication rate was found to be relatively higher in the MIPO group when compared to the IMN group. No significant difference was observed between these two groups regarding ASES and MEPS scores. Three patients in the MIPO group suffered iatrogenic radial nerve injury and recovered after four to five months later. No implant failures occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary interlocking nail seemed to be superior to minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of proximal- and middle-thirds of humeral shaft fractures due to shorter operative time and union time, less early post-operative pain, and fewer complications. The intramedullary interlocking nail could be considered a better surgical option for the management of proximal middle humeral fractures, though it may also depend on the surgeons' skills and learning curve. Further in-depth prospective studies are in great need to verify our conclusion.

Geometrical analysis for assessing torsional alignment of humerus

BACKGROUND

Compared to other types of surgeries, minimally invasive surgeries (MISs) of humeral shaft fractures are associated with less radial nerve injury, less soft tissue injury and higher union rate. However, malrotation often occurs in MISs when closed reduction methods are used. This study aims to define specific palpable landmarks to help surgeons determine the correct torsional angle and reduce the incidence of malrotation.

METHODS

Twenty-eight normal humeral computed tomography scans were retrieved from our image database. One line was drawn through the vertices of the intertubercular sulcus of the humeral head in the coronal view, and another line was drawn through the longest axis between the medial and lateral condyles in the coronal view. The angle between these two lines was measured at least 3 times for each scan.

RESULTS

The profile of the intertubercular sulcus tangent line of the humeral head and the axis of the distal humerus was identified as the most accurate method for assessing the precision of torsion during MIS for humeral shaft fractures. The transepicondylar axis line is more internally rotated than the intertubercular sulcus tangent line. The mean angle was measured to be 41.1 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

The axis of the distal humeral condyles is internally rotated by approximately 41.1 degrees compared with the intertubercular sulcus tangent line of the humeral head. Minimally invasive surgeries can be performed by using these palpable landmarks. The torsional deformities can be reduced with the proper angle adjustment without the need for fluoroscopy. It can also be used to treat unstable comminuted humeral fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective Study, Diagnostic study, Level III.

Interlocking nailing of femoral shaft fractures with an extremely narrow medullary canal is associated with iatrogenic fractures

INTRODUCTION

Controversy exists regarding the use of reamed interlocking nailing in femoral shafts with extremely narrow medullary canals (diameter ≤ 9 mm). The aims of this study were to (1) investigate the association of age and sex on femoral canal diameter in patients with a simple femoral shaft fracture and (2) compare the outcomes and complications of interlocking nailing between wide and extremely narrow intramedullary canals.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For the purposes of this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients with simple femoral shaft fractures were recruited between January 2009 and December 2016. The patient demographic data were analyzed. Then, fractures treated with interlocking nailing were divided into the wide group (canal diameter > 9 mm) and narrow group. The primary outcome was union rate, and the secondary outcomes were complications such as thermal necrosis, fat embolism syndrome, iatrogenic fracture, and implant failure.

RESULTS

This study included 340 femoral shaft fractures. The average canal diameter was 9.97 ± 1.79 mm, with significantly wider canals in men than in women. Overall, 289 of the patients had undergone interlocking nail fixation, and a similar union rate and complications were noted between the wide canal and narrow canal groups, with the exception of the incidence of iatrogenic fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral shaft fractures associated with extremely narrow medullary canals are more common in women than in men. There was a similar union rate found when using interlocking nailing in a femoral shaft fracture in cases with extremely narrow and wider canals. Iatrogenic fracture is the only significant risk when using interlocking nailing in femoral shafts with extremely narrow canals.

Narrow locking compression plate vs long philos plate for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of spiral humerus shaft fractures

Background

Our hypothesis was that minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using long philos plate (LPP) would show better clinical and radiological outcomes and less complications than narrow locking compression plate (NLCP) for spiral humerus shaft fractures with or without metaphyseal fracture extension.

Methods

From January 2009 to May 2016, we retrospectively studied 35 patients who underwent MIPO for spiral humerus shaft fractures with or without metaphyseal fracture extension (AO classification 12 A, B, C except A3). Eighteen patients underwent MIPO with a 4.5 mm NLCP (group I) in the early period of this study, while 17 patients underwent MIPO with LPP (group II) in the later period. Range of motion (ROM), pre- and post-operative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral angulation of the fracture, operation time, amount of bleeding, and functional outcomes including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California at Los Angeles score, and Simple Shoulder Test score were analyzed at the final follow up.

Results

All patients had complete bony union and achieved satisfactory functional outcomes except 2 patients. In LPP group, better outcomes in postoperative fracture angulation on X-ray and operation time (p < 0.05) were shown. But, two revision surgery with NLCP and bone graft was performed owing to 2 metal failures.

Conclusions

In spiral humeral shaft fractures, LPP group showed better fracture reduction on X-ray and shorter operation time except metal failure owing to weak fixation. Even though MIPO technique using LPP is easier and more accurate reduction method, rigid fixation should be considered.

Anteromedial minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for distal third humeral shaft fractures - Is it possible?: A cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the anteromedial minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) approach for distal third humeral shaft fractures and identify neurovascular structures at risk with this approach.

METHODS

Twenty cadaveric arms were fixed with 12-hole precontoured narrow locking compression plates (LCP) with the anteromedial approach using MIPO technique. The proximal approach was done between the biceps and deltoid muscle directly to the bone. The distal approach involved elevating the brachialis from medial intermuscular septum. The plate was inserted beneath the brachialis tunnel from distal to proximal. Three locking screws were fixed at each end through incisions and the rest of screws were inserted percutaneously. The arms were then dissected to identify damage to or direct contact between the screws and brachial artery (BA), median nerve (MN), musculocutaneous nerve (MCN), and radial nerve (RN). The distances from the screws to structures at risk, humeral length, and length of three distal screws in mediolateral (ML) direction were measured.

RESULTS

The average humeral length was 28.97 cm. The average danger zone for the BA and MN were 20.47%-62.66% of the humeral length from the lateral epicondyle, and 20.47%-75.02% for the MCN. The ulnar nerve was not endangered by this approach as it lies posteromedially to the humerus. The danger zone for the RN averaged 27.07%-43.74%, and the most dangerous screw that either penetrated or touched the nerve was at the fifth hole, which lay at 33.14% of the humeral length. The average length of three distal screws in ML direction were 41.4, 25.0 and 22.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The anteromedial MIPO approach can be performed through the internervous plane beneath the brachialis muscle without exposing any nerves or causing any muscle splitting with a 12-hole plate. Both proximal and distal screw insertion must be done with direct exposure. Insertion of percutaneous screws in the middle part of the plate between the two incisions is not possible. This approach could be an alternative for extra-articular distal third humeral shaft fractures which provides less invasive surgical dissection, allows the use of longer distal screws, and achieves better cosmesis.

Scientific and academic production and visibility of the Faculty of Health Sciences of Universidad del Cauca

Introduction: Bibliometric indexes are important indicators of the quality of the country’s medical programs. There are few studies of this kind at the Universidad del Cauca.Objective: To evaluate the scientific-academic activity of the Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS) of the Universidad del Cauca based on bibliometric production indicators of the authors, visibility and impact during the period 2010-2016.Materials and methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional, bibliometric research. Different categories of the academic production of the FHS were identified (citation by authors, language of publication, areas of health sciences), and the main journals where the authors published. In addition, the metric indicators of the journals and citation indexes of the authors were determined, as well as their enrollment in research groups and the most cited publications according to SCOPUS.Results: 183 articles were found. The main language of publication was Spanish and mainly in the clinical-surgical area. 60% of the articles of the main authors have some international collaboration. The Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud of Universidad del Cauca had the largest number of articles published by authors of the same faculty during the period under study.Conclusion: The scientific and academic production and visibility of the FHS of the Universidad del Cauca is low. The findings reveal the need for greater institutional support for research, and the creation and support of research groups and incubators. Therefore, this work seeks to encourage greater visibility of the FHS in the national and international scientific field.

Anterior approach in humeral plating osteosynthesis

CONTEXT

Humeral plating osteosynthesis is controversial, particularly regarding the choice between anterior and lateral approach, data for which in the context of a low-income country are lacking.

HYPOTHESIS

The anterior approach is an easy surgical technique, allowing good anatomic reconstruction. We hypothesize that the anterior approach is associated with fewer neurovascular lesions and functional sequelae than the lateral approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study with assessment update was carried out over a period of 6years 4months from January 2010 to June 2016, with consecutive recruitment in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. It consisted in a review of medical records, with physical reassessment on pre-designed and tested data-sheet. Sixty-two osteosyntheses were documented in 60 subjects operated on for humeral fracture or non-union. The following variables were studied: sociodemographic data, fracture profile, clinical profile, and functional shoulder and elbow results. Data analysis used the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 23.0. Associations between qualitative variables were assessed on Chi square test, or Fisher test when the expected sample size was less than 5, and between quantitative and qualitative variables on Student t-test for comparison of means; p values≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The anterior approach showed better results. Operative time was shorter, at 102.5min on average, for 262cm³ blood loss, versus 141.6min and 330cm³ on the lateral approach, with a significant correlation between the two variables. The incidence of postoperative radial paralysis was significantly higher with the lateral approach (22.6% versus 3.2%; p=0.02), and there were likewise higher rates of postoperative infection (9.7% versus 6.5%), secondary displacement, implant damage, and malunion. Reduction was more often anatomical with the anterior approach (28.1% versus 11%) and cortical fixation was better (83.9% versus 61.3%). Functional shoulder and elbow recovery was nearly normal with both approaches, with superimposable values and no statistically significant difference in (p=0.4).

CONCLUSION

Cameroon being a low-income country, the anterior approach is of therapeutic and prognostic interest, being easy to perform, with a low rate of postoperative complications and good functional outcome.

Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis of Humeral Shaft Fractures: Current State of the Art

Most closed humeral shaft fractures can be successfully managed nonsurgically. However, fractures for which closed treatment is unsuccessful are stabilized using either plates or intramedullary nails. There are shortcomings associated with each technique, including the potential complications of nonunion, infection, shoulder pain, and radial nerve injury. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), an innovative alternative treatment, is gaining in popularity. This technique is based on the anterior humeral shaft providing a relatively safe surface for plate application, and limited open exposures proximally and distally allow percutaneous insertion of the necessary implant. More than 40 articles have been published regarding MIPO, and it compares favorably to other available forms of treatment with excellent functional outcomes and a lower rate of iatrogenic radial nerve injury. Larger randomized controlled trials comparing this method with other accepted techniques, including nonsurgical management, are necessary to better define the role of MIPO in the management of humeral shaft fractures.

Rotational evaluation of humeral shaft fractures with proximal extension fixed using the MIPO technique

INTRODUCTION

Diaphyseal fractures with proximal humeral extension can be treated using a helical model, so it is lateral on the proximal aspect and on the diaphyseal segment in the anterior surface.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate possible rotational deviations using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and to determine how it affects upper limb function.

METHODS

We followed 11 patients for a period of two years. The proximal approach was anterior-lateral, and the distal approach was anterior, dividing the brachial muscle. For rotational evaluation, we used the semi-axial incidence described by Oztuna et al., assessing the degree of retroversion of the humeral head in relation to the elbow. During follow-up, we measured bilateral range of motion, shoulder function (UCLA), and upper limb function (DASH).

RESULTS

For patients whose final result was an increase in retroversion, there was an average difference of 9°, with an increase in the final difference of external rotation of 3° compared with the other shoulder, and no difference between the final levels of internal rotation. In the patients whose final result was a decrease in retroversion, where the distal fragment was fixed in internal rotation, the difference observed was an average of 6°. These patients had an average decrease of the external rotation of 5° with an increase of the internal rotation by two levels. The final functional scores were "good" and "excellent" in all patients, with a mean UCLA of 31.8 points (28-34) and a mean DASH of 9.11 points (0.83-22.2).

CONCLUSION

In all patients, there was a difference in the humeral head retroversion compared to the contralateral limb, but with little clinical repercussion and good or excellent functional scores.

Effectiveness of sonography assisted minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) compare with fluoroscope assisted in femoral shaft fracture: A cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

A minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has an advantage of biological soft tissue preservation that consists of preserving bony blood supply, fracture hematoma and less soft tissue damage which leads to decreasing of infection rate and rapid bone healing. However, the radiation exposure is still a disadvantage of this technique. A sonography that provides dynamic real time imaging may be used as an alternative technique for assisting MIPO. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of MIPO in femoral shaft fracture between the sonography assisted and the fluoroscopy assisted.

METHODS

Twenty-eight cadaveric limbs were subjected to create femoral shaft fracture. Then, sonography assisted reduction with temporary external fixation and MIPO were performed. Images of the sonography and the fluoroscopy were recorded including before reduction, after reduction and after MIPO in order to identify fracture displacements in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions. Moreover, the anterior and posterior distances from edge of the bone to the plate were measured to confirm plate position. The effectiveness of this technique was defined as the proper plate position and acceptable alignment after fixation. All distances from the sonography and the fluoroscopy were also analyzed and compared using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman method to assess the agreements between two tests.

RESULT

All of the subjects were met the criteria for acceptable alignment. We found only three femoral shaft fracture (11%) operated with MIPO by sonography assisted that showed slipped plate off femoral bones. According to Pearson correlation, there were good to excellent agreements in term of measuring fracture displacement before (Pearson Correlation >0.7) and after reduction (Pearson Correlation >0.7) between these two tests. There was moderate agreement regarding to evaluation of plate position (Pearson Correlation 03.-0.7). When we compared two methods of measurement using Bland-Altman plot, there were no statistical significant difference (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Images from the sonography could provide visualization of the fracture during reduction and MIPO as accurately as the radiography. Thus, the sonography assisted MIPO in femoral shaft fracture can be done effectively comparing with radiographic assisted.

Comparison between antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN), open reduction plate osteosynthesis (ORPO) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in treatment of humerus diaphyseal fractures

INTRODUCTION

The three currently used methods of treatment: namely open reduction plate osteosynthesis (ORPO), Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), antegrade intramedullary nailing(IMN) are all reported as satisfactory procedures for treatment of humeral shaft fractures. However none of the published reports have a comparison of superiority of one procedure over the other. We evaluated the clinical, radiological and functional outcome of the three procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied adult patients with humerus shaft fractures over a period of 2 years from May 2014 to May 2016 in a level 1 trauma center. Forty-four were treated with IMN, 34 treated with ORPO, and 34 with MIPO. The null hypothesis tested in this study is that there is no difference between IMN, ORPO, MIPO with respect to union time, surgical time, complication rate, non-union rate and functional outcome. Functional outcome was studied by comparing the UCLA shoulder and MEP scores in the three groups.

RESULTS

112 patients were studied consisting of 83 males and 29 females with mean age of 39 years (range 18-70). IMN group showed early union with mean of 12.73 weeks compared to MIPO (14.45 weeks) and ORPO(13.58 weeks), (p<0.05). MIPO had no events of non-union, as compared to ORPO (5 non-unions) and IMN (10 non-unions), (p=0.04). The range of movement at the shoulder with the UCLA score was significantly better with a score of 32.26 in MIPO as compared to 27.54 in IMN and 28.82 in ORPO (p<0.05). The difference in MEPS score in the three groups was not significant (p=0.31). IMN required a mean of 117.95 minutes intraoperatively as compared to 131 and 150.58 mins in MIPO, ORPO respectively.

CONCLUSION

MIPO is overall better with respect to non-union, functional outcome and complications rate. The surgical time depends on the surgeons' skill and learning curve. Thus considering the advantages and risks involved in the various procedure and surgical acumen, each case should be individualized to have a good outcome. We advocate that MIPO can be safely used as an alternative in treating these fractures.

Is Anterior Bridge Plating for Mid-Shaft Humeral Fractures a Suitable Option for Patients Predominantly Involved in Overhead Activities? A Functional Outcome Study in Athletes and Manual Laborers

BACKGROUND

To assess the functional and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive anterior bridge plating (ABP) for mid-shaft humerus fractures in patients predominantly involved in overhead activities (athletes and manual laborers).

METHODS

Forty-eight patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were treated with ABP at a level-I trauma center using a 4.5-mm dynamic/locking compression plate and followed for a period of 1 year. Functional outcome was assessed using the Constant, Mayo elbow, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Range of motion (ROM), subjective strength, and radiographic union were assessed. A general satisfaction questionnaire was also administered.

RESULTS

Most patients achieved excellent functional and radiological outcomes. ROM and strength of the shoulder girdle exhibited clinically nonsignificant loss as compared to the opposite side. The mean time for return to the original activities was 64 days (range, 36 to 182 days) and the mean time for confirmed radiographic union was 45 days (range, 34 to 180 days). The mean Constant, Mayo elbow, DASH scores were 95.73 ± 5.76 (range, 79 to 100), 95.94 ± 6.74 (range, 85 to 100), and 1.56 ± 3.15 (range, 0.0 to 14.0), respectively. The majority of patients (43 patients, 89.6%) who fell in the excellent or very good category according to our questionnaire were extremely satisfied. There were 2 cases (4.17%) of nonunion and 3 patients (6.25%) had to change/modify their original occupation.

CONCLUSIONS

ABP is fundamentally different from traditional open posterior plating or conventional intramedullary nailing. It gives relative stability with union taking place by callus formation, and a longer plate on the tensile surface ensures that the humerus can withstand greater amount of rotational and bending stresses. The minimally invasive nature causes minimal soft tissue damage and, if done correctly, causes no damage to the vital structures in proximity. ABP for mid-shaft humerus fractures in patients predominantly engaged in overhead activities is a safe and effective treatment modality yielding high rates of union, excellent functional recovery, minimal biological disruption, better cosmesis, and superior satisfaction rates.

The treatment of distal third humeral diaphyseal fractures: Is there still a place for the external fixation?

INTRODUCTION

The treatment for humeral diaphyseal fractures is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of treating humeral distal third diaphyseal fractures by using external fixation technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively review 65 cases of diaphyseal humeral fractures (31 type A, 23 type B and 11 type C of the AO/OTA classification) treated with external fixation (Orthofix FAD small) between 2008 and 2013. The mean follow-up was 48 months (24-72 months). There were 12 open fractures; however, no cases of concomitant vascular injury were described. The transolecranic traction was always applied to promote partial reduction through ligamentotaxis. In case of interposition of soft tissues impeding reduction, a small incision was performed allowing mobilization of bone ends.

RESULTS

All fractures resulted healed at a mean of 11 weeks (range 9-13 weeks); the average time of removal of the external fixator was 88 days (range 65-95 days). At the last follow-up, the mean elbow flexion was 132.6° (Min 126°-Max 137°) and the mean elbow extension was 6.4° (Max 0°-Min 13°). The Cassebaum's index rated as excellent in 47.8 % (31 patients), good in 37 % (24 patients), fair in 9.2 % (6 patients) and poor in 6 % (4 patients). The mean DASH score at the final follow-up was 14.7 (range 0-33); 15 patients had a range score between 10 and 20, 43 had less than 10, and seven had more than 20. We observed three cases of superficial infections and two cases of acute radial nerve palsy recovered within 3 months.

CONCLUSION

According to the excellent clinical results and full rate of consolidation, we state external fixation as a valid option in the treatment of distal third humeral diaphyseal fractures.

Case-Match Controlled Comparison of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis and Intramedullary Nailing for the Stabilization of Humeral Shaft Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To compare the risk of major complications after either minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) or intramedullary nailing (IMN) of humeral shaft fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective, case-match controlled study.

SETTING

A major metropolitan tertiary referral trauma center in Australia.

PATIENTS

Thirty patients with fractures of the humeral shaft.

INTERVENTION

Either MIPO or IMN were performed on 15 patients each with traumatic humeral shaft fractures.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

The cumulative risk of 3 major complications associated with these procedures: nonunion, infection, and iatrogenic radial nerve injury.

RESULTS

An overall major complication rate of 53% was observed in the patients treated with IMN; one complication (7%) was identified in those managed with humeral MIPO, a nonunion. Complications after IMN included 4 patients (27%) with nonunion, 3 patients (20%) with iatrogenic radial nerve injuries, and 1 patient (7%) with a wound infection. Statistical analysis revealed a significant between-group difference (P = 0.01) in the cumulative rate of major complications. When each of these complications was considered independently, no statistically significant difference was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that humeral MIPO results in a significantly lower pooled major complication rate than that of IMN, and it should therefore be considered an attractive alternative to IMN in those patients requiring surgical stabilization of a traumatic humeral shaft fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Newly designed minimally invasive plating of a humerus shaft fracture; a different introduction of the plate

PURPOSE

Open reductions and internal fixations are currently being used the most in surgeries of humeral shaft fractures. However, there are some limitations such as invasive techniques and formation of many operation scars. To overcome these limitations, a minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis has been recently introduced. However, this has technical limitations such as deep dissections of the distal portion and narrowness of the fixation space. To address these problems, we designed another introductory technique of a minimally invasive osteosynthesis and we have examined the clinical usefulness of that.

METHODS

The results were retrospectively analyzed with 83 patients who visited INHA hospital due to a humeral shaft fractures and who had undergone the above said surgery from the beginning of 2010 to the end of 2012. The patients were divided into two groups: patients treated by the MIPO technique using the newly designed dual approaches (group A) and patients treated by open reduction and plating internal fixation (group B).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in mean duration of injury, the mean fracture union time, range of motion and MEPI for group A and B. There was no statistical significance between the two groups. However, the occurrence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in group B, was significantly higher than in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

MIPOs using the dual approaches on the adult humerus shaft fracture show an excellent bony union without nerve injury which is clinically useful.

Is minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture advantageous compared with the conventional open technique?

BACKGROUND

The minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique has been described and used effectively in humeral shaft fractures. However, the postoperative deformity resulting from malreduction with the minimally invasive technique has not received adequate attention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative malrotation and the functional results of the MIPO technique and conventional plating in open reduction and internal fixation after humeral shaft fracture.

METHODS

A prospective cohort research was performed; 53 cases of humeral shaft fractures in a level I trauma center were included and allocated into group I for open reduction and internal fixation or group II for MIPO. Computed tomography was used to measure the postoperative malrotation. The status of the union, functional scoring, and muscle strength were recorded at 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Both groups exhibited satisfactory union results and final shoulder function scoring. Shoulder girdle musculature of both groups exhibited considerable strength loss with no obvious intergroup discrepancy, with greater internal rotation strength loss compared with external rotation. A significantly increased incidence of postoperative malrotation >20° was observed in the MIPO group (40.9% vs. 0%; P < .01). A linear correlation between postoperative malrotation and range of rotation loss was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The MIPO technique might be advantageous as a cosmetic consideration; however, it did not improve postoperative function and strength restoration results more than the open technique. Moreover, MIPO was associated with greater postoperative malrotation, which was considered to be correlated with subsequent long-term shoulder degeneration.

Posterior minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of distal third humeral shaft fractures with segmental isolation of the radial nerve

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes of a cohort of patients with distal third humeral shaft fractures treated using a posterior minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique. Twenty-one patients were retrospectively evaluated, 13 men and 8 women with an average age of 37 years. The surgery was performed through two posterior incisions away from the fracture site. The radial nerve was identified and protected. The fracture was fixed with a narrow 4.5/5.0mm locking compression plate. After an average follow-up of 22 months, flexion-extension of the elbow was 138°±7°, with a range of motion of 131°. Shoulder motion was 160° in forward flexion, 59° in external rotation, and internal rotation was to the spinous process of 9th thoracic vertebra. Pain severity was 0.5 on the VAS. The DASH score was 9. Average Constant score was 84. MEPI was 97. Fracture union was obtained in all patients. One patient developed transient postoperative radial nerve palsy. These results demonstrate that the posterior MIPO technique is a reliable option for treating distal third humeral shaft fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Radiographic landmark for humeral head rotation: a new radiographic landmark for humeral fracture fixation

BACKGROUND

There is no definite radiographic landmark in plain radiographs for proximal humeral rotation, which is an important parameter for avoiding rotational malalignment during fracture fixation. Here, we used radiographic images of cadaveric humeri to determine whether the landmark of the crest of lesser tuberosity (CoLT) in plain radiographs could be used to determine humeral rotation.

METHODS

Twenty adult cadaveric humeri were collected and seven consecutive radiographic anteroposterior views (45°, 30°, 15° internal rotation; neutral rotation; and 15°, 30°, 45° external rotation) were obtained for each specimen.

RESULTS

The proportional distance (PD) of the CoLT landmark relative to the humeral head was measured and analysed. The mean PDs of the CoLT landmark were 10.2%, 17.9%, 25.6%, 35.9%, 53.4%, and 62.9% of the diameter of the humeral head, corresponding to 45°, 30°, and 15° external rotation, neutral rotation, and 15° and 30° internal rotation, respectively. We found significant differences in the mean PDs with humeral rotation.

CONCLUSION

The projection of the CoLT in plain radiographs can be used as an important landmark to assess humeral head rotation and will be a useful landmark for rotational control of fracture fixation.

Fracture of distal humerus: MIPO technique with visualization of the radial nerve

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes in patients treated for humerus distal third fractures with MIPO technique and visualization of the radial nerve by an accessory approach, in those without radial palsy before surgery.

METHODS

The patients were treated with MIPO technique. The visualization and isolation of the radial nerve was done by an approach between the brachialis and the brachiorradialis, with an oblique incision, in the lateral side of the arm. MEPS was used to evaluate the elbow function.

RESULTS

Seven patients were evaluated with a mean age of 29.8 years old. The average follow up was 29.85 months. The radial neuropraxis after surgery occurred in three patients. The sensorial recovery occurred after 3.16 months on average and also of the motor function, after 5.33 months on average, in all patients. We achieved fracture consolidation in all patients (M=4.22 months). The averages for flexion-extension and prono-supination were 112.85° and 145°, respectively. The MEPS average score was 86.42. There was no case of infection.

CONCLUSION

This approach allowed excluding a radial nerve interposition on site of the fracture and/or under the plate, showing a high level of consolidation of the fracture and a good evolution of the range of movement of the elbow. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

Minimal invasive ostheosintesis for treatment of diaphiseal transverse humeral shaft fractures

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate patients with transverse fractures of the shaft of the humerus treated with indirect reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws through minimally invasive technique.

METHODS:

Inclusion criteria were adult patients with transverse diaphyseal fractures of the humerus closed, isolated or not occurring within 15 days of the initial trauma. Exclusion criteria were patients with compound fractures.

RESULTS:

In two patients, proximal screw loosening occurred, however, the fractures consolidated in the same mean time as the rest of the series. Consolidation with up to 5 degrees of varus occurred in five cases and extension deficit was observed in the patient with olecranon fracture treated with tension band, which was not considered as a complication. There was no recurrence of infection or iatrogenic radial nerve injury.

CONCLUSION:

It can be concluded that minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate can be considered a safe and effective option for the treatment of transverse fractures of the humeral shaft. Level of Evidence III, Therapeutic Study.

The function and muscle strength recovery of shoulder after humeral diaphysis fracture following plating and intramedullary nailing

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the shoulder function and shoulder girdle muscle strength of humeral diaphysis fractures postoperatively following intramedullary nailing (IMN) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

Fifty cases of humeral diaphysis fractures were randomly allocated into two groups. Antegrade IMN and ORIF were, respectively, performed in group I and II. Union status, functional scoring, range of motion, muscle strength of shoulder girdle including external/internal rotation and abduction/adduction strength were recorded at 18 months after surgery. Statistical package for social sciences 13.0 was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Group I had lower functional score than group II (P < 0.05). Both groups had approximately 50 % of muscle strength loss on injured side. In group II, the internal rotation strength loss was significantly greater compared to group I (P < 0.01). The total side to side (internal plus external) range of rotation (ROR) lack and external ROR lack of involved shoulder was significantly greater in group I (P = 0.005 and 0.049). The range of abduction lack was also significantly greater in group I.

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgically treated groups had significant loss of muscle strength of shoulder girdle when measured at 18 months postoperatively. There was greater loss of rotation strength in ORIF group than the IMN group. However, IMN had lower functional scores and a decreased range of motion postoperatively. The assumption that rotator cuff damage caused by nailing leads to weaker abduction strength than plating was not supported.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture: a reproducible technique with the assistance of an external fixator

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has become a popular option for treatment of humeral shaft fractures. However, indirect reduction might risk unpromising results, with mal-alignment/mal-union or nonunion. The purpose of this study was to describe a reproducible MIPO technique that used an external fixator during the procedure as a tool for reduction and maintenance, and to assess the outcomes in patients with humeral shaft fracture.

METHODS

Of 31 consecutive cases of humeral shaft fracture in 30 patients, 29 were included in this study. There were seven simple (type A) and 22 comminuted (type B or C) fractures. After the insertion of one Schanz pin on each proximal and distal humerus, a provisional reduction was achieved by connecting the pins with a monolateral external fixator. The MIPO procedure was then performed over the anterior aspect of the humerus. To evaluate the efficacy of the provisional reduction by external fixator, coronal and sagittal alignments were assessed. We also assessed bony and functional results, including complications, from this technique.

RESULTS

There was no case of mal-union >10°, and mean angulation was 1.3° (range 0°-9°) in the coronal plane and 1.2° (range 0°-8°) in the sagittal plane. Twenty-eight of 29 fractures were united, including three delayed unions, with a mean union time of 19.1 weeks (range 12.3-38.4 weeks) and a mean follow-up of 20.8 months (range 13.5-31.0 months). There was one hypertrophic nonunion that healed after fixing with two additional screws. Except one patient with associated injury in the elbow, all patients recovered to pre-injury joint motion. There were two cases of postoperative radial nerve palsy that both recovered completely. We attributed them to manipulation, and not to the Schanz pins or plate fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures with external fixator-assisted reduction and MIPO resulted in excellent reductions and high union rates.

Humeral shaft fractures

Management of humeral shaft fractures has historically been largely conservative. A significant body of literature, dating back to the 1970s, has shown that functional bracing may achieve greater than 90 % union rates and acceptable functional outcomes. More recently, however, with the advent of new surgical techniques and implant options, less tolerance for acceptable deformity and functional deficits, and less patience with conservative management, many treating orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly likely to consider surgical intervention. This article reviews the current recommendations for treatment of humeral shaft fractures, including both nonoperative and operative intervention. It also discusses the current thinking and operative trends in humeral shaft fracture fixation.

[Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis of proximal humeral shaft fractures with long PHILOS plates]

OBJECTIVE

Closed reduction and minimally invasive stabilization of proximal humeral shaft fractures with long PHILOS plates. The presented technique enables stable extramedullary fixation of the fractures without affecting surrounding nerves.

INDICATIONS

Proximal humeral shaft fractures that may not be fixed by intramedullary nailing because of a narrow, deformed or occupied intramedullary canal or because of open growth plates.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Fractures that may not be reduced adequately by traction or with percutaneous techniques. Furthermore, fractures with delayed or nonunion and pseudarthrosis should not be treated with this technique.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

An anterolateral delta split approach is used to create an epiperiosteal tunnel along the humeral shaft from proximally to distally. A second incision is made distally at the lateral border of the biceps muscle. The brachialis muscle is dissected longitudinally. The PHILOS plate is twisted so that the proximal part of the plate can be placed laterally and the distal part anterolaterally at the humeral shaft. The plate is inserted into the epiperiostal tunnel and fixed with percutaneous screws.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

The arm is immobilized in a Gilchrest bandage until wounds are healed. Active-assisted physiotherapeutic mobilization without loading starts on the first postoperative day. Active mobilization starts 8-12 weeks postoperatively. In cases of soft tissue irritation the PHILOS plate may be removed after 1 year.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2011 a total of 16 patients (8 women and 8 men) were treated with the presented technique. The patients mean age was 61 years. According to the AO classification, five fractures were classified as type A, eight as type B and three fractures as type C. All patients had clinical and radiological follow-up examinations after a mean of 24 months (12-38 months). All fractures showed complete bony consolidation at the final follow-up. The mean Constant-Murley score was 81 points representing 84% of the Constant-Murley score of the healthy contralateral shoulder. The average DASH score was 33 points and the mean SF36 was 85 points.

Minimally invasive percutaneous plating of proximal humeral shaft fractures with the Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS)

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated our results after minimally invasive percutaneous plating of proximal humeral shaft fractures with the Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS, Synthes, Switzerland).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2008, 15 patients with unilateral displaced proximal humeral shaft fractures were treated and followed up over a median period of 27 months (range, 12-38 months). The final follow-up included anteroposterior and lateral x-rays, range of shoulder motion, pain by visual analog scale (VAS), the Constant-Murley shoulder score, the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Elbow (DASH) score, and the Short Form 36 (SF36) assessment.

RESULTS

No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. No secondary fracture displacement or radial neuropathy was observed postoperatively. One patient had open reduction and internal fixation for pseudoarthrosis 16 months after the initial surgery. At the final follow-up, the median range of motion of the operated shoulder was flexion, 145°; extension, 45°; internal rotation, 40°; external rotation, 70°; and abduction, 135°. Median results on outcome assessments were VAS pain score, 0 points; Constant-Murley score, 74 points, representing 87.5% of the median Constant-Murley score of the unaffected shoulder; DASH score, 34 points, and the SF36, 83 points.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive percutaneous plating with the PHILOS offers a valid option in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures with comparable rates of nonunion and lower rates of radial neuropathy compared with open procedures. Furthermore, the results indicate that this method is associated with lower rates of wound infection and a shorter stay in the hospital for the patient.

Treatment of proximal and middle one-third humeral fractures with lateral distal tibial helical plate

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of treating patients with proximal and middle one-third humeral fractures treated with lateral distal tibial helical plate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2004 to January 2009, 12 patients (8 men, 4 women: average age: 46.8 years, range: 25-63) with proximal and middle one-third humeral fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using lateral distal tibial helical plate. Standard anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained and evaluated. Shoulder function was assessed according to the Constant-Murley score.

RESULTS

At follow-up (average: 18 months), all fractures had healed (average: 15 weeks, range: 9-23). There were no cases of intraoperative complications, implant failures, infections, or iatrogenic intra- or post-operative nerve lesions. All patients achieved at least 100° of abduction by 3 months post-surgery and full range of movement by 12 months post-surgery, with the exception of one patient who had an impingement symptom with moderate loss of abduction and external rotation. The average Constant-Murley score was 88 points at 12-month follow-up. According to Constant-Murley score, 28% of patients had excellent functional outcome, 64% had good outcome, 8% had moderate outcome, and none had failure. According to self-reporting, all patients had returned to the pre-injury level of activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The lateral distal tibial helical plate promotes bone healing and minimizes the damage to the deltoid muscle insertion region, thereby facilitating rapid and good functional recovery. In addition, the helical plate design avoids affecting sliding of the biceps tendon and maintains good reduction position. The lateral distal tibial helical plate is an effective surgical option for proximal and middle one-third humeral fractures.