Kapandji pinning and tuberosities fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus

Effect of humeral rotation on the reliability of radiographic measurements for proximal humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

There are concerns as to the reliability of proximal humerus radiographic measurements, particularly regarding the rotational position of the humerus when obtaining radiographs.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with proximal humerus fractures fixed surgically with locked plates received postoperative anteroposterior radiographs with the humerus in neutral rotation and in 30° of internal and external rotation. Radiographic measurements for head shaft angle, humeral offset and humeral head height were performed in each humeral rotation position. Intra-class correlation coefficient was used to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Mean differences (md) in measurements between humeral positions was evaluated using one-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

Head shaft angle demonstrated good-to-excellent reliability; the highest estimates for inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.94) and intra-rater reliability (ICC: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.98) were achieved in neutral rotation. There were significant differences in measurement values between each rotational position, with mean head shaft angle of 133.1° in external rotation, and increasingly valgus measurements in neutral (md: 7.6°; 95% CI: 5.0, 10.3°; p < 0.001) and internal rotation (md: 26.4°; 95% CI: 21.8, 30.9°; p < 0.001). Humeral head height and humeral offset showed good-to-excellent reliability in neutral and external rotation, but poor inter-rater reliability in internal rotation. Humeral head height was significantly greater using internal compared to external rotation (md: 4.5 mm; 95% CI: 1.7, 7.3 mm; p = 0.002). Humeral offset was significantly greater in external compared to internal rotation (md: 4.6 mm; 95% CI: 2.6, 6.6 mm; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Views of the humerus in neutral rotation and 30° of external rotation displayed superior reliability. Differences in radiographic measurement values, depending on humeral rotation views, can make for problematic correlations with patient outcome measures. Studies assessing radiographic outcomes following proximal humerus fractures should ensure standardized humeral rotation for obtaining anteroposterior shoulder radiographs, with neutral rotation and external rotation views likely yielding the most reliable results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

A comparative retrospective study of locking plate fixation versus a dedicated external fixator of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: Results after 5 years

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the proximal humerus (PHF) represent a common injury among orthopedic department; especially for three- and four-part fractures no consensus about the best treatment is still achieved. The aim of our study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients alternatively treated with plates and screws or external fixation system for a type III-IV proximal humerus fracture.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty-nine patients went surgery for type III-IV PHF between January 2011 and January 2014. According to the Neer classification, fractures were classified as type III in 50 cases (72,46%) and type IV in 19 cases (24,56%). 45 patients were treated with plates (65%) and 24 external fixators (35%). The patients' mean age was 62 years (range, 31-87 y). At five years, 60 patients (86,9%) were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Constant Score (CS), the range of motion, and radiological evaluation. The CS at five years was the primary outcome measure. Results were evaluated and compared with the contralateral unaffected side to avoid bias related to different ages.

RESULTS

At the final follow up, we found no clinical differences when comparing the two procedures. Moreover, when age was considered as a variable, a significative difference of the CS was observed in the group of patients younger than 65 years treated with a plate (Plate Group Mean: 79; SD: +/- 15. Ex Fi Mean: 58; SD:+/- 4. P = 0,008). In the group of patients older than 65 years, the two procedures did not show significative differences in outcomes (Plate Group Mean: 69; SD: +/- 15. Ex Fi Mean: 63; SD:+/- 7. P = 0,032). External fixation procedure was overall associated with a reduction in blood loss, surgical time, length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous techniques have a long tradition in PHF treatment; the introduction of dedicated external fixation system has the advantage to improve the stability and allow early rehabilitation when compared to the classical pinning technique. In our experience, the indication elderly patients with osteoporosis and comorbidities may benefit by this type of mini-invasive surgery with low soft tissue damages.

Three point fixation of pediatric proximal humerus fractures by prebent wave-shaped wires: technical notes

Pediatric proximal humerus fractures are uncommon and mostly treated conservatively. However, surgical treatment should be considered in displaced fractures classified as Neer-Horowitz grade III-IV in children older than 11 years. We describe a three-point fixation method of applying two Kirschner wires, prebent into a wave shape, and inserted into the proximal humerus through a single cortical hole. In this minimally invasive approach, we treated four boys, obtaining accurate reduction and stable fixation, with all patients starting pendulous exercises the day after surgery. At follow-up, all patients had regained full shoulder range of motion, with no residual pain and no complications recorded.

A prospective study for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the Galaxy Fixation System

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the proximal humerus represent a common problem in clinical practice; in particular for three- or four-part fractures, there is no consensus regarding which is the best treatment. The aim of our study was to report clinical and radiological outcomes in patients treated with the Galaxy Fixation System™ for a proximal humerus fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients of which 18 (56.25%) women, and 14 (43.75%) men suffering from proximal humerus fractures were treated using the Galaxy Fixation System™. Fractures were classified according to Neer and only patients with a three- or four-part fracture with two-thirds of the methaphysis intact were included. Clinical examination included the Constant-Murley score, UCLA score and Quick DASH evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. In addition, at the final follow-up, patients were asked to complete the SF-12 questionnaire. The humeral head-shaft angle was evaluated by radiographs the day after surgery, as well as after 12 and 24 months.

RESULTS

All 32 patients were available for the 6th, 12th and 24th month follow-up examination. The mean interval between trauma and surgery was 2.7 days (range 0-6 days). The period of hospital stay ranged from 2 to 8 days with an average of three days. The time of healing ranged from 4 to 10 weeks with an average of 7 weeks. The mean Constant score increased from 72.9 after 6 months to a mean of 82.8 at 12 months (p < 0.05) to 88.9 at 24 months (p < 0.05). UCLA score ranged from 27.5 at 6 months to 29.5 at 12 months (p < 0.05) and finally improved to 32.3 at final follow-up (p < 0.05). Quick DASH varied from 7.2 at 6 months after surgery to 5.2 at 12 months after surgery (p > 0.05) and reached the value of 3.1 after 24 months (p > 0.05). Mean Mental Component (MCS) resulted in a value of 48.1, while the Physical Component (PCS) was 52.7. The mean head-shaft angulation was 137.6° the day after surgery compared with 137.5° (p > 0.05) measured 12 months later, and 137.2° measured 24 months later (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Galaxy Fixation System™ is a safe and efficient procedure for the treatment of three- or four-part proximal humerus fractures, providing an excellent outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective case series, Level IV.

Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 4-part displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: Multicenter retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Complex 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus are one of the most difficult fractures to manage. For several years, reverse total arthroplasty (RSA) has been proposed as an alternative to hemiarthroplasty (HA) when internal fixation is insufficient. The goal of this study was to compare the short and intermediate term results of these 2 different types of arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective, multicenter study, 57 HA and 41 RSA were reviewed after a follow-up of at least 2 years. The clinical evaluation was based on the absolute and adjusted Constant scores, Simple shoulder value (SSV) and the quick-DASH scores. The radiological assessment included standard radiological tests.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 39 months, the RSA group had a significantly higher adjusted Constant score than the HA group (83% vs 73%, respectively P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference in the absolute Constant score, the quick-DASH or the SSV scores. Active anterior elevation was better in the RSA group, while internal rotation was better in the HA group (130° vs 112°, P=0.01; sacrum vs L3, P=0.03). There was no significant difference in external rotation (28° vs 23°, P=0.31). The rate of complications was higher in the HA group than in the RSA group (24% vs 10%, P=0.01). The radiological rate of union of the greater tuberosity was similar in both groups (70%) and scapular notching was found in 23% of the RSA group.

CONCLUSION

The short and intermediate term clinical outcomes are better with RSA than with HA. The complication rate is higher with HA. Nevertheless, scapular notching occurred in more than 20% of patients with RSA, suggesting that care should be taken when using this prosthesis in young, active patients.