Evaluation of patellofemoral joint in ADVANCE Medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty for severe valgus deformity of the knee with extra-articular deformities of the femur and tibia using a 3-dimensional image matching software system

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Knee osteoarthritis with femoral and/or tibial extra-articular deformities makes total knee arthroplasty (TKA) technically difficult to perform, especially using intramedullary-based instrumentation systems. The Athena Knee 3-dimensional (3-D) image matching software is effective for TKA with an extra-articular deformity, especially in case of using a long-stem prosthesis or not available computer-assisted navigation systems.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 79-year-old woman presented with right knee pain secondary to a progressive valgus deformity and gait disturbance. She had experienced a supracondylar femoral fracture fifteen years ago, and a tibial shaft fracture ten years ago on the same side; both of fractures were treated surgically. She had a severe valgus knee deformity and extra-articular deformity of femur and tibia, and valgus stress test detected medial knee instability. The range of motion was 0° in extension and 75° in flexion. Severe medial knee laxity compelled us to use a constrained and long-stem prosthesis, resulting in the use of an intramedullary guided system. The 3-D software system helped us to determine the amount of bone to cut as well as the appropriate entry points for the intramedullary rods and mechanical axis restoration. At two years after surgery, knee range of motion improved to 90° in flexion, and walking ability had also advanced from the use of two crutches to that of a T cane.

CONCLUSION

The 3-D image matching software system for preoperative planning was useful for TKA with extra-articular deformity, especially in the case of a long-stem prosthesis without using a navigation system.

Medial Pivot Versus Posterior-Stabilized Prosthesis Design in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies of clinical outcomes that compare the Medial Pivot design (MP) with the Posterior-Stabilized design (PS) were controversial. The meta-analysis was performed to summarize existing evidence, aiming to determine whether MP was superior to PS prosthesis.

METHODS

Search strategies followed the recommendations of the Cochrane collaboration. Electronic searches such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were systematically searched for publications concerning medical pivot and posterior stabilized prosthesis from the inception date to April 2021. Authors also manually checked and retrieved a reference list of included publications for potential studies, which the electronic searches had not found. Two investigators independently searched, screened, and reviewed the full text of the article. Disagreements generated throughout the process were resolved by consensus, and if divergences remain, they were arbitrated by a third author. Subsequently, patients were divided into the MP and PS groups.

RESULTS

This study included 18 articles, comprising a total of 2614 patients with a similar baseline. The results showed the PS group had a higher risk of the patellar clunk or crepitus. However, the theoretical advantages of MP prosthesis could not translate to the difference in knee function, clinical complications, revision rate and satisfaction. Similarly, the shape and mechanism of prostheses could not affect the implant position and postoperative alignment.

CONCLUSIONS

The MP prosthesis can reduce the patellar clunk or crepitus rate. However, choices between the MP and PS prosthesis would not affect knee function, clinical complications, revision rate, patient satisfaction, implant position, and postoperative alignment.

Comparison of Biomechanical Gait Parameters and Patient-Reported Outcome in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty With the Use of Fixed-Bearing Medial Pivot and Multi-radius Design Implants—Retrospective Matched-Cohort Study

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered to be highly successful in treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis. There are multiple implant designs available on the market, and it is difficult to point which one is the best. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes and gait pattern after TKA with the use of fixed-bearing medial pivot (K-Mod) vs multi-radius design (NexGen) implants and to compare them to norms for healthy patients with no osteoarthritis or arthroplasty procedure in anamnesis.

Methods

A group of 30 patients who received the medial pivot (MP) TKA and 33 patients who received the posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA between May and August of 2018 were included. All surgeries were performed in the level III academic hospital by a single surgeon. Every patient was asked to fulfill the The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Standard X-ray, biomechanical gait analysis using a motion capture system, and statistical analysis were performed at 2 years postoperatively.

Results

A total of 28 patients from either MP cohort (93%) or PS (85%) matched-control cohort completed the whole assessment at the final follow-up. There were statistically significant differences in a few gait parameters such as shorter mean step length both in operated and healthy limb, lower mean gait velocity, and lower mean walking cadence than the norm in both MP and PS groups. As to the WOMAC score, there was statistically significant improvement in both groups comparing preoperative and postoperative outcomes. Nevertheless, in the MP group, there was a significantly higher score, indicating worse outcomes, in the stiffness part of the WOMAC score than in the PS group. No significant differences were found between groups during radiological evaluation.

Conclusions

There were satisfying and promising clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes in both MP and PS groups with very little difference in relation to norm values. However, both implants failed in fully restoring gait patterns similar to the healthy limb of the same patient.

Medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other TKA designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical and patient-reported outcome measures of medially stabilised (MS) TKA when compared to other TKA designs.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses algorithm was used. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EMCARE databases were searched to June 2020. Studies with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up comparing an MS TKA design to any other TKA design were included. The statistical analysis was completed using Review Manager (RevMan), Version 5.3.

RESULTS

The 22 studies meeting the inclusion criteria included 3011 patients and 4102 TKAs. Overall Oxford Knee Scores were significantly better (p = 0.0007) for MS TKA, but there was no difference in the Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS)-Knee, KSS-Function, and range of motion between MS and non-MS TKA designs. Significant differences were noted for sub-group analyses; MS TKA showed significantly worse KSS-Knee (p = 0.02) and WOMAC (p = 0.03) scores when compared to Rotating Platform (RP) TKA while significantly better FJS (p = 0.002) and KSS-knee scores (p = 0.0001) when compared to cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA.

CONCLUSION

This review and meta-analysis show that MS TKA designs result in both patient and clinical outcomes that are comparable to non-MS implants. These results suggest implant design alone may not provide further improvement in patient outcome following TKA, surgeons must consider other factors, such as alignment to achieve superior outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Loss of Knee Flexion and Femoral Rollback of the Medial-Pivot and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty During Early-Stance of Walking in Chinese Patients

Background The medial-pivot (MP) prosthesis was developed to produce more physiological postoperative knee kinematics and better patient satisfaction than traditional prostheses, but outcomes are inconsistent in different studies of Caucasian patients. This study aimed to investigate the postoperative patient satisfaction and in vivo knee kinematics of the MP and posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthesis during gait activity in Chinese patients.

Methods A retrospective analysis of 12 patients was received for this study in each MP group and PS group. Patient-reported satisfaction level and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were evaluated with questionnaires. A dual fluoroscopic imaging system was used to investigate in vivo knee kinematics of MP and PS total knee arthroplasty (TKA) during treadmill walking at a speed of 0.4 m/s.

Results Comparable promising patient satisfaction and overall FJS (MP 60.7 ± 15.35 vs. PS 51.3 ± 17.62, p = 0.174) were found between the MP and PS groups. Peak flexion appeared at around 70% of gait cycle with values of 52.4 ± 7.4° for MP and 50.1 ± 3.6° for PS groups (no difference). Both groups maintained a stable position at the stance phase and began to translated anteriorly at toe-off with an amount of 4.5 ± 2.3 mm in the MP and 6.6 ± 2.7 mm in the PS (p = 0.08) group until late swing. The range of this external rotation motion was 5.9 ± 4.8 and 6.2 ± 4.1° (p = 0.79) for the MP and PS, respectively.

Conclusion A similar knee kinematics pattern characterized by a loss of early-stance knee flexion and femoral rollback during walking was observed in the MP and PS TKAs. Our study confirmed similar effectiveness of MP TKA compared to PS TKA in Chinese patients, while the change of knee kinematics of both implants during slow walking should be noted.

Mid-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty-a mean five year follow-up based on one thousand, one hundred and twenty eight cases

PURPOSE

The unique medial-pivot (MP) design of ADVANCE® system largely simulates the movement of a normal knee joint and a high mid- and long-term success rate has been reported in limited populations. The aims of this study are to investigate the mid-term clinical outcomes and survivorship based on a large cohort with 1128 cases.

METHODS

One thousand seven patients received 1276 ADVANCE® MP TKAs from January 2011 to April 2016 in our institution were retrospectively investigated. The range of motion (ROM), the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes and Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to calculate the survivorship.

RESULTS

In an averaged five year follow-up, the results of 879 patients (1128 knees) were successfully obtained and the clinical outcomes of 1107 knees were recorded. One hundred forty-eight knees (11.6%) were lost to follow-up. Excellent mid-term ROM, KSS, KSFS, and WOMAC score were recorded. A total of 53 complications were identified and most complications were related to the discordance of femoropatellar joint. Taking revision for any reason as end point, the overall survivorship was 99.2% at seven years. When taking all cases lost to follow-up as failures, the survivorship was 83.8% at five years and 50.6% at seven years.

CONCLUSION

For MP designs, the intermediate clinical outcomes are good to excellent and the mid-term survivorship related to reasons other than infection is also satisfactory.

Comparison of clinical and radiographic results between total knee arthroplasties using medial pivot and posterior-stabilized prosthesis: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) between using medial-pivot (MP) and posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthesis. Does MP prosthesis and PS prosthesis influence the clinical results of a TKA?

METHODS

An electronic literature search of PubMed Medline and the Cochrane Library was performed from inception to October 1, 2019. A meta-analysis to compare postoperative outcomes of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Knee Society Score (KSS), range of motion (ROM), complications, and radiographic results between MP and PS prosthesis were conducted.

RESULTS

Seven eligible studies involving 934 adult patients (MP group, n = 461; PS group, n = 473) were identified for analysis. This study showed no significant difference between the 2 groups in the WOMAC scores, KSS, ROM, and complications (P > .05). The differences of the femorotibial angle, position of implant, and patellar tilt were also not significant between the 2 groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis has shown that patients with the MP prosthesis have similar clinical results as patients with PS prosthesis. Furthermore, the radiographic results, especially patella tilt angle, were also similar between the 2 groups. Therefore, surgeons should be aware that the types of prostheses are not a decisive factor to ensure successful operation.

Early Patellofemoral Function of Medial Pivot Prostheses Compared with Posterior-Stabilized Prostheses for Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Objective

To systematically evaluate the patellofemoral joint design of medial pivot prosthesis, which incorporates a variety of “patella‐friendly” design features, by comparing clinical and radiographic results with another prosthesis.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with medial pivot prosthesis (Group MP, 126 cases) between September 2016 and April 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective study. For each patient reviewed, a control patient was matched, according to age, gender, side, body mass index (BMI), preoperative range of motion (ROM), and operating period, who had received primary unilateral TKA with a conventional posterior‐stabilized prosthesis at the same period as the study group (Group PS, 126 cases). All patients underwent at least 1‐year follow‐up. At the preoperative and final follow‐up periods, data on the Knee Society Score (KSS) score, WOMAC score, Kujala score, and ROM were collected. Merchant views were taken with the knee flexion at 30°, 60°, and 90° to measure patella shift and tilt. Preoperative posterior condylar angle (PCA) was also measured. Postoperative complications, including anterior knee pain, maltracking, patellar clunk or crepitus (PCC), were evaluated.

Results

There were no significant differences in the demographics or clinical characteristics between the two groups. No statistically significant difference was identified in the KSS total score, including knee score and function score, or in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score between the two groups after the operation. We found statistically significant differences in the postoperative Kujala scores and the ROMs between the two groups. The mean Kujala score in group MP was better than in group PS (MP 77.16 ± 3.80 vs PS 75.97 ± 4.06, P < 0.05), while the ROM in group PS was significantly higher than in group MP (MP 122.24° ± 4.45° vs PS 123.78° ± 6.05°, P < 0.05). Simultaneously, the preoperative/postoperative Kujala score improvement in group MP was observed to be significantly larger than in group PS (MP 27.82 ± 5.31 vs PS 26.17 ± 4.89, P < 0.05), but the average ROM improvement in group PS was significantly greater than in group MP (MP 19.00° ±9.90° vs PS 21.57° ± 9.62°). In the 90° Merchant view, the mean patella tilt of group MP was statistically smaller than that of group PS (MP 4.21° ± 1.62° vs PS 4.74° ± 1.95°, P < 0.05), and the average patella tilt change in group MP was significantly greater than in group PS (MP –3.8° ± 1.43° vs PS –3.23° ± 1.33°, P < 0.05). Preoperative PCA did not show significant differences between the two groups. Two cases of PCC and three cases of anterior knee pain were noted in group MP, and nine cases and six cases, respectively, were observed in group PS. The incidence of PCC was significantly lower in group MP (1.6% vs 7.1%, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in follow‐up time between the two groups.

Conclusion

The medial pivot prosthesis could achieve satisfactory outcomes with better patellofemoral performance attributed to its “patella‐friendly” design characteristics compared to the conventional posterior‐stabilized prosthesis.

Conventional computed tomography software can be used for accurate pre-operative templating in bipolar hip arthroplasty: A preliminary report

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of pre-operative templating for bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA) for displaced femoral neck fracture using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) of computed tomography (CT) images.

METHODS

Nineteen patients who underwent BHA were enrolled in this study. For pre- and post-operative evaluation, a CT scan was performed from the pelvis to the knee joints. MPR of the CT image was done using software to measure the femoral head cup diameter, offset, stem size, length of the modular neck, distance from the neck osteotomy, and femoral anteversion. We compared these parameters pre- and post-operatively.

RESULTS

Both the femoral head cup diameter and length of the modular neck were found to be significantly different between pre- and post-operative measurements, although the differences were minor. Other parameters, including the femoral offset, were not significantly different between the pre- and post-operative measurements. The size of the femoral stem, cup diameter, and length of the modular neck were consistent with the planned size and accurate (within ±1 size) in more than 84% cases.

CONCLUSION

Our pre-operative templating approach for BHA using MPR of CT has potential clinical utility as a complementary tool for pre-operative planning using three-dimensional templating software. Moreover, this technique could be feasible in most hospitals without additional expenditure.

Decreased Survival of Medial Pivot Designs Compared with Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA Without Patellar Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

The medial pivot TKA design was introduced in the 1990s. These are fixed-bearing, medial-conforming implants with virtually no translation in the medial part of the knee, in contrast to the flat lateral part of the insert allowing for translation similar to the native knee during flexion and extension. Most primary TKAs performed in Norway and Australia are cruciate-retaining. All of the medial pivot implants in our study are cruciate-sacrificing but without a post-cam mechanism. The medial pivot implant design was developed to more closely mimic native knee motion, in the hope of improving function, and not primarily as a more constrained knee for difficult cases. In the past 10 to 12 years, a second-generation medial-pivot design has emerged, but there are no larger registry studies on the survival of these implants. Both cruciate-retaining and medial pivot designs are reported in the Australian and Norwegian registries, allowing for large-scale, comparative survivorship studies.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there any difference in survival between the medial pivot design and the three most commonly used cruciate-retaining TKA designs? (2) Is there any difference in survival among the different medial pivot implant designs? (3) What are the main indications for revision of medial pivot TKAs?

METHODS

Registry data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry and Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 2005 until the end of 2017 were used to compare the five different brands of medial pivot TKA designs (total primary TKAs assessed: 6310). In Australia, the study group of medial pivot implants represented 9% (6012 of 72,477) of the total number of cemented/hybrid TKAs without patellar resurfacing; 345 had cementless femoral components. In Norway, the study group represented 1% (298 of 47,820) of the total number of TKAs with cemented tibias without patellar resurfacing; all had cemented femoral components. The control group consisted of the three most commonly used cruciate-retaining TKA designs (n = 70,870; Australia n = 54,554; Norway n = 16,316). All TKAs used a fixed-bearing, cemented tibial component and did not involve patella resurfacing. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was assessed to estimate survivorship. We compared the groups by calculating the hazard ratios (HR) using Cox regression adjusted for age, gender and preoperative diagnosis with 95% CI. To answer our third question, we calculated the percentage of each revision indication from the total number of revisions in each group, and used a Cox regression analysis to compare revision causes and HRs. Analyses were performed separately by each registry. Accounting for competing risks (Fine and Gray) did not alter our findings [].

RESULTS

After controlling for potential confounding variables such as gender, age and preoperative diagnosis, we found an increased revision risk for the medial pivot compared with cruciate-retaining TKA designs in Australia (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2 to 1.7]; p < 0.001), but not in Norway (HR 1.5 [95% CI 0.9 to 2.4]; p = 0.1). Two brands of the medial pivot design reported to the AOANJRR showed an increased risk of revision compared with cruciate-retaining designs: the Advance® II MP (HR 1.7 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.6]; p = 0.004) and the GMK® Sphere (HR 2.0 [95% CI 1.5 to 2.6]; p < 0.001), whereas the MRK (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.4 to 1.5]; p = 0.4), the Evolution® MP (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.0 to 1.9]; p = 0.06) and the SAIPH® (HR 0.9 [95% CI 0.5 to 1.5]; p = 0.7) showed no difference. The most common reasons for revision of medial pivot implants in Australia were infection (27%), pain alone (19%), patellar erosion (13%), loosening/lysis (12%); in Norway the primary indications were loosening/lysis (28%), instability (28%), malalignment (11%) and pain alone (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

The medial pivot TKA design as a group had a higher revision rate than cruciate-retaining fixed-bearing controls in TKA performed without patellar component resurfacing. By brand, the Advance II MP and the GMK Sphere had inferior survivorship, whereas the MRK, the SAIPH and the Evolution MP had no differences in survivorship compared with cruciate-retaining controls. In Australia, TKAs with the medial pivot design without patella resurfacing had a higher rate of revisions for instability, malalignment, and patella erosion. In Norway, there was an increased risk of revision for lysis and loosening compared with the cruciate-retaining design. Several of these implants had short follow-up in this study. Further registry studies with longer follow up are therefore necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Medial Pivot Prostheses and Posterior-Stabilized Prostheses in Total Knee Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To compare medial pivot (MP) prostheses to two types of posterior-stabilized (PS) prostheses (NexGen and NRG) in terms of patient satisfaction, causes of dissatisfaction, and risk factors for dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A total of 453 patients who underwent primary TKA by one senior surgeon from August 2016 to August 2018 were investigated in a retrospective study, including 121, 219, and 113 patients in the MP, NexGen, and NRG groups, respectively. The mean age and follow-up time of patients were 70.82 ± 7.06 years and 20.64 ± 3.88 months. A survey was designed and responses were collected by telephone, WeChat, and outpatient follow up. Patient satisfaction, causes of dissatisfaction, post-TKA pain on a numeric rating scale (NRS), and range of motion (ROM) were compared among groups, and risk factors were investigated. Patient satisfaction included a five-level satisfaction rating (very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied), with five options for causes of dissatisfaction (persistent pain, limited ROM, knee instability, asthenia, and/or other factors).

RESULTS

Overall, 89.84% of patients were satisfied with the results of primary TKA. There were no significant differences among the three groups regarding the side of the operation, the length of hospitalization in days, or the average follow-up time. Patient satisfaction was similar among the MP (87.38%), NexGen (89.89%), and NRG groups (90.32%). Persistent pain after TKA was the major cause of dissatisfaction (32/40), but no difference in the frequency of this complaint was found among the groups (P = 0.663). The NRS score (P = 0.598) and the ROM (P = 0.959) of the MP group were not significantly different from those of the NexGen and NRG groups. Gender, length of hospitalization, and follow-up time were all uncorrelated with patient satisfaction, but age showed a very weak correlation with patient satisfaction (r = 0.110, P = 0.033). Moreover, the NRS score (r = 0.459, P < 0.000) and the ROM (r = -0.175, P = 0.001) were significantly correlated with patient dissatisfaction. The odds ratio of dissatisfaction was 6.37 (P < 0.000) in patients with moderate to severe pain (NRS ≥ 3) compared to patients with mild pain (NRS < 3).

CONCLUSION

Patient satisfaction and function were not found to be higher in the MP group than in the two PS groups, and persistent pain was the major cause of and an important risk factor for patient dissatisfaction.

Influence of Narrow Femoral Implants on Intraoperative Soft Tissue Balance in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Narrow femoral implants were developed to improve fit and prevent overhang in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared intraoperative soft tissue balance between standard and narrow implants in posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA.

METHODS

We enrolled 30 consecutive patients with varus osteoarthritis undergoing PS TKA using an image-free navigation system. Standard and narrow femoral trial implants were inserted, and their soft tissue balance was measured. Subgroup analysis, based on the actual implanted femoral implant, was performed to assess the influence of narrow implants on soft tissue balance.

RESULTS

Narrow trial group had significantly larger joint component gaps than standard trial group at all measured flexion angles, except at 60° (P < .05). For the standard implant cohort, narrow trial group had significantly larger joint component gaps than standard trial group at 30°, 120°, and 135° flexion (P < .05). For the narrow implant cohort, narrow trial group had significantly larger joint component gaps than standard trial group at all measured flexion angles, except at 0° and 60° (P < .05). Narrow trial group had significantly larger varus ligament balance than standard trial group at 45° and 60° flexion (P < .05). The varus angles for standard implants were comparable between groups; however, narrow trial group had significantly larger varus angles for narrow implants than standard trial group at 45°, 60°, and 120° flexion (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The medial-lateral dimension and volume of the femoral component may influence intraoperative soft tissue balance in PS TKA. The effects may be greater when narrow implants are selected to avoid component overhang.

Does the medial pivot knee improve the clinical and radiographic outcome of total knee arthroplasty? A single centre study on two hundred and ninety seven patients

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a cost-effective surgery with a survival rate higher than 90% after 15 years. Nevertheless, patients are unsatisfied in more than 15% of cases. Medial pivot (MP) prosthetic designs were introduced in late 90's with the aim to reproduce natural knee kinematics. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the survivorship and clinical outcomes of a novel design of MP knee with a minimum follow-up of five years.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent primary TKA using the K-Mod dynamic congruence implant (Gruppo Bioimpianti, Peschiera Borromeo, Milan, Italy) between 2012 and 2013 at a single institution. A total of 339 patients (351 knees) were included with a mean age of 74 years (range 41-89). The Knee Society score, the global range of movement, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis score, Forgotten Joint score, and the short-term form 12 health survey were collected. FJS and SF-12 were collected only post-operatively. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated according to the Knee Society's roentgenographic evaluation system. Kaplan-Meyer (KM) curves were performed to evaluate implant survivorship. A two-tailed paired t test was performed to evaluate the differences between pre-operative and post-operative score.

RESULTS

A total 297 patients (315 knees) were available for clinical and radiographic analysis, and the mean follow-up was 66.4 months. A total of 17 patients (17 knees 5.4%) experienced a post-operative complication, and a reoperation was performed in five patients (5 knees 1.6%). Four patients had a periprosthetic joint infection, and two patients had a post-traumatic periprosthetic femoral fracture. The KM survivorship at five years was 98.2% (95% CI 0.96 to 0.99) for revision for any reason. There was a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) in all the objective and subjective outcomes measured.

CONCLUSION

The K-Mod dynamic congruence design has shown an excellent clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome in primary TKAs.

Comparison of Coronal Prosthetic Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using 3 Computer-Assisted Navigation Systems

Recent advances in surgical tools such as navigation systems have contributed to accurate implantation in total knee arthroplasty. Although several navigation systems have been developed, reports regarding which navigation system has better accuracy are few. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the accuracy of postoperative coronal alignment among 3 navigation systems. A total of 90 knee prostheses were implanted for 90 patients with osteoarthritis. Thirty patients were enrolled in each of the following 3 navigation groups: Stryker Navigation System II (computed tomography-free navigation; Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey); OrthoPilot version 4.2 navigation system (computed tomography-free navigation; B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany); and VectorVision navigation system (computed tomography-based navigation system; BrainLAB, Munich, Germany). Thirty consecutive total knee arthroplasties performed via the conventional method without navigation were selected as a control group for comparison with the navigation groups. Postoperative coronal mechanical axis and femoral and tibial coronal component angles were compared among the groups using long-leg standing radiographs for the rate of outliers beyond 3°. No differences were observed in the mean femoral and tibial component angles among the navigation and conventional groups. However, the proportion of outliers beyond 3° was higher in the conventional group than in the 3 navigation groups. No significant differences in the outlying values were found among the 3 navigation groups. These 3 navigation systems achieved equally accurate coronal mechanical alignment with fewer outliers. The navigation systems exhibited more precise implantation than the conventional method. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e621-e628.].

Analysis of in-vivo articular cartilage contact surface of the knee during a step-up motion

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have reported on the tibiofemoral articular cartilage contact kinematics, however, no data has been reported on the articular cartilage geometry at the contact area. This study investigated the in-vivo tibiofemoral articular cartilage contact biomechanics during a dynamic step-up motion.

METHODS

Ten healthy subjects were imaged using a validated magnetic resonance and dual fluoroscopic imaging technique during a step-up motion. Three-dimensional bone and cartilage models were constructed from the magnetic resonance images. The cartilage contact along the motion path was analyzed, including cartilage contact location and the cartilage surface geometry at the contact area.

FINDINGS

The cartilage contact excursions were similar in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions in the medial and lateral compartments of the tibia plateau (P>0.05). Both medial and lateral compartments were under convex (femur) to convex (tibia) contact in the sagittal plane, and under convex (femur) to concave (tibia) contact in the coronal plane. The medial tibial articular contact radius was larger than the lateral side in the sagittal plane along the motion path (P<0.001).

INTERPRETATIONS

These data revealed that both the medial and lateral compartments of the knee experienced convex (femur) to convex (tibia) contact in sagittal plane (or anteroposterior direction) during the dynamic step-up motion. These data could provide new insight into the in-vivo cartilage contact biomechanics research, and may provide guidelines for development of anatomical total knee arthroplasties that are aimed to reproduce normal knee joint kinematics.

Effects of Suture and Tourniquet on Intraoperative Kinematics in Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effects of suture (soft tissue closure) and air tourniquet use on intraoperative kinematics in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

The study included 20 patients with varus-type knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using computed tomography (CT)-based navigation. Intraoperative tibiofemoral kinematics from maximum extension to maximum flexion were measured using the computed tomography-based navigation. The measurements were performed 3 times as follows: measurement 1: before suture (tourniquet on), measurement 2: after suture (tourniquet on), and measurement 3: after tourniquet removal. Details of kinematics including knee joint gap, tibiofemoral rotational angles, and anteroposterior (AP) distance between the femur and tibia were compared among the 3 measurements and statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

On the medial side, there was no significant difference among the 3 measurements in the extension gap, but measurement 1 showed a significantly larger flexion gap compared with the other 2 measurements. On the lateral side, there was no significant difference between the extension and flexion gaps in all measurements. The anteroposterior distance in measurement 1 showed that the femur was positioned significantly more anterior to the tibia at 10° and 20° of flexion compared with the other 2 measurements after suture. There was no significant difference among the 3 measurements in the tibiofemoral rotation angles.

CONCLUSION

These results found that the effect of suture and tourniquet was minimal, and that intraoperative kinematics can effectively evaluate postoperative passive kinematic conditions.

Navigation-based tibial rotation at 90° of flexion is associated with better range of motion in navigated total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

In clinical practice, people with better femorotibial rotation in the flexed position often achieve a favourable postoperative maximum flexion angle (MFA). However, no objective data have been reported to support this clinical observation. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the correlation between the amount of intraoperative rotation and the pre- and postoperative flexion angles.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with varus osteoarthritis undergoing computer-assisted posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were enrolled. After registration, rotational stress was applied towards the knee joint, and the rotational angles were recorded by using a navigation system at maximum extension and 90° of flexion. After implantation, rotational stress was applied for a second time, and the angles were recorded once more. The MFA was measured before surgery and 1 month after surgery, and the correlation between the amount of femorotibial rotation during surgery and the MFA was statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

Although the amount of tibial rotation at maximum extension was not correlated with the MFA, the amount of tibial rotation at 90° of flexion after registration was positively correlated with the pre- and postoperative MFA (both p < 0.005). However, no significant relationship was observed between the amount of tibial rotation after implantation and the postoperative MFA (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that better femorotibial rotation at 90° of flexion is associated with a favourable postoperative MFA, suggesting that the flexibility of the surrounding soft tissues is an important factor for obtaining a better MFA, which has important clinical relevance. Hence, further evaluation of navigation-based kinematics during TKA may provide useful information on MFA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic studies, development of diagnostic criteria in a consecutive series of patients, and a universally applied "gold" standard, Level II.

Medial pivot knee in primary total knee arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a medial pivot design was developed in order to mimic normal knee kinematics; the highly congruent medial compartment implant should improve clinical results and decrease contact stresses. Clinical and radiographic mid-term outcomes are satisfactory, but we need other studies to evaluate long-term results and indications for unusual cases.

Comparison of Midterm Clinical and Radiographic Results Between Total Knee Arthroplasties Using Medial Pivot and Posterior-Stabilized Prosthesis-A Matched Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the theoretical advantage of a knee design that can more reliably replicate the medial pivot (MP) of the natural knee, only a few clinical studies have compared the clinical results between the MP prosthesis and another design of prosthesis. We compared the midterm results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using an MP prosthesis vs a posterior-stabilized prosthesis via a matched-pair analysis; we included results related to patellofemoral joint symptoms.

METHODS

The midterm clinical and radiographic results of 125 consecutive patients (150 knees) who underwent a TKA with the ADVANCE MP prosthesis were compared with those of a control group who had undergone a primary TKA with a posterior-stabilized prosthesis.

RESULTS

Values of the Knee Society's Knee Scoring System, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Kujala and Feller scoring systems, as well as the range of motion after TKA, did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. No differences in femorotibial angle and component position, including the patella component, were observed between the 2 groups. No significant differences in the change of patella tilt angle and the postoperative patellar translation were observed between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with the MP prosthesis experienced satisfactory pain relief and a functional recovery, providing results similar to those of the posterior-stabilized prosthesis, including the resolution of patellofemoral joint symptoms.

Navigation-based femorotibial rotation pattern correlated with flexion angle after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To investigate whether intraoperative kinematics obtained by navigation systems can be divided into several kinematic patterns and to assess the correlation between the intraoperative kinematics with maximum flexion angles before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHOD

Fifty-four posterior-stabilised (PS) TKA implanted using an image-free navigation system were evaluated. At registration and after implantation, tibial internal rotation angles at maximum extension, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, and maximum flexion were collected. The rotational patterns were divided into four groups and were examined the correlation with maximum flexion before and after operation.

RESULTS

Tibial internal rotation from 90° of flexion to maximum flexion at registration was correlated with maximum flexion angles pre- and postoperatively. The four groups showed statistically different kinematic patterns. The group with tibial external rotation up to 90° of flexion, following tibial internal rotation at registration, achieved better flexion angles, compared to those of another groups (126.7° ± 12.0°, p < 0.05). The group with tibial external rotation showed the worst flexion angles (80.0° ± 40.4°, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the group with limited extension showed worse flexion angles (111.6° ± 8.9°, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Navigation-based kinematic patterns found at registration predict postoperative maximum flexion angle in PS TKA. Navigation-based kinematics can be useful information during TKA surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic studies, development of diagnostic criteria in a consecutive series of patients and a universally applied "gold" standard, Level II.

No difference in patellar kinematics between fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation

PURPOSE

The influence of cruciate-ligament-retaining (CR-TKA) and cruciate-ligament-substituting (CS-TKA) TKA on tibiofemoral kinematics was analysed in many investigations. However, the influence on patellar kinematics is unclear so far. The aim of this study was to compare patellar kinematics of the natural knee with those after CR- and CS-TKA.

METHODS

Patellar kinematics of nine healthy whole-body cadaveric knees before and after CR- and CS-TKA was investigated using a commercial optical computer navigation system. Patellar kinematics of the healthy knee was compared with those after CR- and CS-TKA.

RESULTS

No significant difference between the natural knee and the knee after TKA or between both types of TKA for patellar kinematics could be found. Interestingly, both types of TKA resulted in a more medial patellar shift and a contrary patellar tilt and rotation behaviour. CR- and CS-TKA resulted in smaller values for patellar epicondylar distance at all flexion angles.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found no influence of prosthesis type on patellar kinematics. Factors like component alignment and prosthesis design seem to be more important in terms of adequate restoration of patellar kinematics in TKA than whether choosing CR- or CS-TKA.

Fibular axes are not a reliable landmark for tibial mechanical axes of osteoarthritic knees that underwent total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The sagittal fibular axis serves as an intra-operative landmark during conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, only a few relevant anatomical studies have been published regarding its use as an extramedullary guide. Furthermore, the correlation between the coronal fibular and tibial mechanical axes in osteoarthritic knees has been only reported once. Here, the hypothesis of this study is that the fibula can be a reliable intra-operative landmark, in the sagittal and coronal planes, among patients with osteoarthritis who have undergone TKA.

METHODS

Osteoarthritic knees (n = 62) after TKA were evaluated using three-dimensional image-matching software. The angles between the tibial mechanical axis and the fibular shaft axis were measured in the sagittal and coronal planes. Moreover, correlations between the angles and patient-specific factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean angle between the tibial mechanical and fibular shaft axes was 2.6° ± 2.3° for posterior inclination in the sagittal plane and 0.9° ± 2.0° for varus inclination in the coronal plane. The percentage of subjects with the fibular shaft axis within 2° of the tibial mechanical axis was 17.7 and 69.3 % in the sagittal and coronal planes, respectively. No patient-specific factors were correlated with the angle between the tibial mechanical and fibular shaft axes.

CONCLUSIONS

The angle between the tibial mechanical and fibular shaft axes differed among patients, independent of patient-specific factors, and did not appear to be a reliable intra-operative landmark. Surgeons should use values from individual pre-operative evaluations of the axis as reference for conventional TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

Semimembranosus Release Reduces Tibial Internal Rotation and Flexion Angle in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Medial release for varus knee is a key procedure to obtain appropriate soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The influence of semimembranosus release during cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA on knee kinematics and clinical outcomes were investigated in consecutive 50 patients (25: semimembranosus release group, 25: minimum release group) with moderate varus osteoarthritis using a navigation system. Semimembranosus release significantly reduced the amount of tibial internal rotation before bone cut and after all prostheses implanted. Despite of no significant differences in clinical scores between the groups, minimum release group exhibited significantly higher postoperative flexion angle compared to the semimembranosus release group. Minimal medial release with avoiding semimembranosus release maintains tibial internal rotation in CR TKA, resulting in achievement of postoperative high flexion angle.

Factors affecting intraoperative kinematic patterns and flexion angles in navigated total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To investigate the factors affecting intraoperative kinematics, as measured with a navigation system, and their effect on maximum flexion angles during total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHOD

One hundred posterior stabilised (PS) TKAs performed using an image-free navigation system were evaluated. Tibial internal rotation angles at maximum extension, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, and maximum flexion were collected at registration and after implantation. The varus angles from the coronal mechanical axis were also collected. The rotational patterns were divided into four groups to investigate whether flexion contracture and varus deformity affected the kinematic patterns, and correlated with the maximum pre- and post-operative flexion angles.

RESULTS

At registration, the flexion angles at maximum extension differed significantly between the kinematic groups; the flexion angle at maximum extension at registration was negatively correlated with the pre-operative maximum flexion angle (R(2) = 0.226, p < 0.0001) and the post-operative maximum flexion angle (R(2) = 0.059, p = 0.0167). Varus deformity at registration also differed significantly between the kinematic groups; varus deformity at registration was negatively correlated with the pre-operative maximum flexion angle (R(2) = 0.087, p = 0.0036) and post-operative maximum flexion angle (R(2) = 0.101, p = 0.0027).

CONCLUSION

Navigation-based measurements in patients undergoing PS TKA indicated that pre-operative flexion contracture and varus deformity are negatively correlated with both pre- and post-operative maximum flexion angles. The results may improve the ease with which surgeons can interpret intraoperative kinematics, by providing a multi-dimensional perspective. With further knowledge regarding intraoperative kinematics, it might be possible to improve surgical approach, prosthesis design, and clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

[Patella position and patellofemoral osteoarthritis after unicompartmental arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

Changes of patellar position (height, tilt, and shift) and arthritis of the patellofemoral joint might potentially influence outcome after unicompartmental knee replacement.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this work is to evaluate the influence of the aforementioned parameters on postoperative outcome.

METHODS

Literature analysis via PubMed.

RESULTS

A total of 12 relevant studies (three about Patellar height, two about patellar tilt and shift, seven about patellofemoral osteoarthritis) could be identified. Regarding Patellar height, two out of three studies demonstrated a postoperative decrease. With regard to patellar tilt and shift, only one study identified postoperative lateralization of the patella to be a predictor for poor outcome. The radiological appearance of arthritis of the patellofemoral joint does not significantly influence postoperative knee function except for cases where only the lateral patellar facet is affected. Anterior knee pain has no influence on clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Literature data do not allow for a precise statement about the possible influence of patellar position on the outcome after unicompartmental knee replacement. With proper patient selection, good results can be achieved despite patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Is it possible to re-establish pre-operative patellar kinematics using a ligament-balanced technique in total knee arthroplasty? A cadaveric investigation

PURPOSE

Several authors emphasise that the appearance of patellar maltracking after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is caused by rotational malalignment of the femoral and tibial components. Ligament-balanced femoral component rotation was not found to be associated with abnormal postoperative patellar position. We hypothesised that a ligament-balanced technique in TKA has the ability to best re-establish patellar kinematics.

METHODS

In ten cadaveric knees TKA was performed assessing femoral rotation in ligament-balanced and different femoral and tibial component rotation alignments. Patellar kinematics after different component rotations were analysed using a commercial computer navigation system.

RESULTS

Ligament-balanced femoral rotation showed the best re-establishment of patellar kinematics after TKA compared to the healthy pre-operative knee. In contrast to tibial component rotation, femoral component rotation had a major impact on patellofemoral kinematics.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation suggests that a ligament-balanced technique in TKA is most likely to re-establish natural patellofemoral kinematics. Tibial component rotation did not influence patellar kinematics.