Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better?

Osteoporosis May Not Be an Absolute Contraindication for Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has received growing interest, particularly in younger populations, due to potential long-term survivability and improved bone preservation. Poor bone stock, as seen in osteoporosis, is considered a contraindication for this technique. This study evaluated whether osteoporotic patients < 75 years undergoing cementless TKA demonstrate similar 1) implant-related complications, 2) medical complications, 3) readmission rates, and 4) 3-year implant survivability.

METHODS

A retrospective query of a national administrative claims database was performed between 2010 and 2022 for patients less than or equal to 75 years old who have osteoporosis and underwent primary TKA. Osteoporotic patients were divided into cementless and cemented cohorts, and propensity scores were matched based on age, sex, obesity, and the Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI). Matching produced 7,923 patients (1,321 uncemented, 6,602 cemented). Multivariate logistic regressions evaluated the following outcomes: 90-day and 2-year implant-related complications, 90-day postoperative medical complications, and 90-day readmissions. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to assess 3-year all-cause revision implant survivability. The significance threshold was set to P < 0.01 to minimize type 1 bias.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in implant-related complications, medical complications, readmissions, and lengths of stay between cementless and cemented TKA groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated statistically similar 3-year survivability between cohorts (cemented: 97.6%, CI [confidence interval] 96.6 to 98.5; cementless: 97.2%, CI 96.7 to 97.7; P = 0.472).

CONCLUSION

Patients who have osteoporosis have equivalent medical and implant-related complications as well as 3-year implant survival following cementless TKA compared with a cemented technique. Our results support cementless TKA as a viable option for patients < 75 years, regardless of prior diagnosis of osteoporosis. Intraoperative decisions regarding bone quality are still necessary to discriminate between those who are candidates for cementless TKA with those who are not.

Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Resurgence-Who, When, Where, and How?

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common procedures in orthopaedics, but there is still debate over the optimal fixation method for long-term durability: cement versus cementless bone ingrowth. Recent improvements in implant materials and technology have offered the possibility of cementless TKA to change clinical practice with durable, stable biological fixation of the implants, improved operative efficiency, and optimal long-term results, particularly in younger and more active patients.

METHODS

This symposium evaluated the history of cementless TKA, the recent resurgence, and appropriate patient selection, as well as the historical and modern-generation outcomes of each implant (tibia, femur, and patella). Additionally, surgical technique pearls to assist in reliable, reproducible outcomes were detailed.

RESULTS

Historically, cemented fixation has been the gold standard for TKA. However, cementless fixation is increasing in prevalence in the United States and globally, with equivalent or improved results demonstrated in appropriately selected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless TKA provides durable biologic fixation and successful long-term results with improved operating room efficiency. Cementless TKA may be broadly utilized in appropriately selected patients, with intraoperative care taken to perform meticulous bone cuts to promote appropriate bony contact and biologic fixation.

Cementless versus Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Same Implant Design: A Mean 5-Year Follow-up Study

Cementless implant use continues to increase primarily due to increased numbers of younger and obese patients opting for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Given the increased use of cementless implants, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm clinical performance of cementless TKA using a highly porous tibial baseplate compared with its cemented counterpart of the same system. We conducted a retrospective case-control study of 400 patients undergoing primary TKA that included 200 patients with cementless components matched for age and body mass index (BMI) to 200 patients with cemented implants of the same implant design with a 5-year follow-up. We evaluated clinical results, complications, revisions, and overall survivorship between the cohorts. Statistical analysis was performed using student t-test and chi-square analysis. There was no statistical difference in age (64.3 vs. 64.3 p = 0.81), BMI (34 vs. 33.1 p = 0.19), preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) function (41 vs. 32.3 p = 0.22), and preoperative KSS knee score (39.2 vs. 38.3 p = 0.54) between the cementless and cemented cohorts, respectively. The cementless group had seven revisions, while the cemented group had nine revisions (p = 0.609). The cementless group had one revision due to aseptic loosening versus five in the cemented group (p = 0.09). Postoperative 5-year KSS knee scores were 92.84 versus 91.75 (p = 0.386) and function scores were 81.81 versus 69.65 (p = 0.00004) in the cementless and cemented groups, respectively. The cementless group had survivorship of 96.5% for all-cause revision compared with 95.5% in the cemented group at 5-year follow-up (p = 0.60). Cementless TKA using a highly porous tibial baseplate showed excellent midterm results with one case of aseptic loosening at 5-year follow-up and with similar Knee Society outcome scores and survivorship compared with the cemented group. Cementless TKA demonstrated noninferiority to cemented TKA and could be used as an alternative mode of fixation in patients opting for primary TKA. Additional long-term follow-up is needed to determine if cementless TKA can demonstrate improved survivorship over cemented TKA.

Survivorship and complications of cementless compared to cemented posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Controversy exists on the best fixation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Non-cemented fixation has been theorized to improve patient outcomes and longevity of implantation but no study has focused on comparison between cemented or cementless posterior-stabilized implants despite being the most commonly or second most frequently utilized implant in most total knee replacement registries.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria with observational and interventional papers, and review articles that focused on patients with cementless and cemented PS TKAs were used to analyze outcomes such as implant survivorship, complication, or revision rates. Using a combination of keywords, a systematic search was performed on Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library for Meta-Analysis.

RESULTS

When using the specified criteria, only 8 studies were selected for full-text analysis and meta-analysis after eliminating screening duplicates, titles, and abstracts without full-text access. These eight studies contain 1652 patients, 693 in the non-cemented Group, and 959 in the cemented total knee prosthesis Group. The meta-analysis revealed the advantage of cementless fixation over cemented fixation in implant survivorship, with 0.6% and 2.6% of aseptic loosening in each Group. The cumulative survival at 12 years was 97.4% for the cementless Group and 89.2% for the cemented Group. The subgroup with a stem showed a positive outcome for cementless fixation over cemented fixation regarding implant survivorship. No differences between the cemented and cementless TKAs were observed in patient-reported outcomes, revision rates, or radiolucent line development.

CONCLUSION

We observed comparable rates for cemented and cementless posterior-stabilized TKAs over a medium-term follow-up period.

Cementless and Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasties Have Similar Outcomes but Cementless Patellar Component Migration was Observed in a Paired Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become increasingly popular. Some surgeons are concerned about pain, implant stability, and metal-backed patellar component survivorship. This study investigated the outcomes of cementless compared with cemented TKA in bilateral cases.

METHODS

We randomized 80 knees in 40 osteoarthritic knee patients who underwent bilateral TKA with patellar resurfacing under one anesthesia. All participants received cementless prostheses in one knee and cemented prostheses in the other. The outcomes were knee function measured by the forgotten joint scores, modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, knee ranges of motion, pain levels, operative times, radiographic outcomes, and complications. All knees were followed for a minimum of 2 years (2 to 3 years).

RESULTS

Cementless and cemented TKA had similar functional outcomes in forgotten joint score (97 ± 5 versus 98 ± 3 points, P = .52), modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (3 ± 4 versus 3 ± 2 points, P = .96), and ranges of motion (134 ± 7° versus 134 ± 7°, P = .16). The postoperative pain was also similar (P > .05). There were 4 cementless patellar components had superior migration for an average of 3.5 mm (range, 1.77 to 4.16) without loosening. The mean time of migration was 4 (range, 2 to 6) weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless TKA had similar functional outcomes and recovery patterns compared with cemented TKA. However, there was concern of cementless component migration at patellae.

Impacts of Knee Arthroplasty on Activity Level and Knee Function in Young Patients: A Systematic Review

The annual demand for knee arthroplasty has been steadily rising, particularly in younger patients. The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the impact of knee arthroplasties on knee function and activity levels in young (≤55 years) patients. A PubMed search from inception (1977) to March 2022 to identify eligible studies produced 640 peer-reviewed studies for consideration. A total of 18 studies including 4,186 knee arthroplasties in 3,200 patients (mean patient age at the time of surgery: 47.4 years, range: 18-55 years) were ultimately included for analysis. Mean final follow-up (FFU) duration was 5.8 years (range: 2-25.1 years). Mean FFU improvement in Knee Society Clinical Score was 48.0 (1,625 knees, range: 20.9-69.0), Knee Society Function Score was 37.4 (1,284 knees, range: 20-65). Mean FFU for the Tegner and Lysholm activity scale was 2.8 (4 studies, 548 knees, range: 0.7-4.2); University of California Los Angeles Physical Activity Questionnaire score was 2.8 (3 studies, 387 knees, range: 1.2-5); lower extremity activity scale was 1.84 (529 knees). The available evidence suggest that young patients typically realize sustained improvements in knee function compared to preoperative levels; however, these improvements do not typically translate into a return to desired activity levels or quality of life, and this patient population should expect a higher and earlier risk for revision than their older counterparts. Further research, including robust registry data, is needed to establish evidence-based indications, expectations, and prognoses for outcomes after knee arthroplasty in young and active patients.

Cemented is not superior to cementless total knee arthroplasty for complications: a propensity score matched analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is continued debate regarding the survivorship and revision rate of cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses. This includes the assessment of early revision surgery due to aseptic loosenings and periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Studies have not always taken into account the impact of comorbidities, such as diabetes, obesity, and tobacco. Therefore, we compared revisions in a large population of patients undergoing cemented or cementless TKAs at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years.

METHODS

A review of an administrative claims database was used to identify patients undergoing primary TKA, either cementless (n = 8,890) or cemented (n = 215,460), from October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2020. Revision surgery for PJI and aseptic loosening were identified with diagnosis and associated procedural codes at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years and then compared between groups. A propensity matched-analysis was performed for age, sex, Charles Comorbidity Index (CCI) > 3, alcohol abuse, tobacco use, obesity, and diabetes. Chi square tests assessed statistical significance of differences in the matched cohorts using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Cementless TKA was associated with similar revisions rates due to PJIs at 90 days (OR, 1.04, 95% CI 0.79-1.38, p = 0.83), 1 year (OR, 0.93, 95% CI 0.75-1.14, p = 0.53, and 2 years (OR, 0.87, 95% CI 0.73-1.05, p = 0.17) in comparison to the cemented TKA cohort. The odds ratio of revision due to aseptic loosening was similar as well at 90 days (OR, 0.67, 95% CI 0.34-1.31, 0.31), 1 year (OR, 1.09, 95% CI 0.73-1.61, p = 0.76), and 2 years (OR, 1.00, 95% CI 0.73-1.61, p = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found a comparable risk of PJI and aseptic loosening in cementless and cemented TKA when controlling for several comorbidities, such as tobacco, diabetes, and alcohol. Therefore, with proper patient selection, cementless TKAs can be performed with expectation of low risks of infections and aseptic loosenings.

Results of a Highly Porous Metal-Backed Cementless Patella Implant: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

Initial design cementless metal-backed patellar implants failed due to multiple reasons including implant design, use of first-generation polyethylene, and surgical technique. This study evaluates clinical outcomes and survivorship of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a current generation highly porous metal-backed patellar component. One-hundred twenty-five consecutive primary cementless TKAs with a compression molded highly porous metal-backed patella were reviewed. One-hundred three TKAs (82.4%) with 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up were available for review. These were matched with 103 consecutive TKAs using a cemented patella of the same implant design. The cementless cohort had a mean age of 65.5 years, body mass index (BMI) of 33.0, and follow-up of 64.4 months. Indications for cementless TKA were based on multiple factors including age, BMI, and bone quality. There were no revisions for loosening or mechanical failure of the cementless patella compared with two cemented patellae revised for aseptic loosening. Eight patients required revisions in the cementless cohort: three for prosthetic joint infection (PJI), two for instability, one periprosthetic femur fracture, one for patella instability, and one for extensor mechanism rupture. Five patients required revisions in the cemented cohort: two for aseptic patellar loosening, one for aseptic femoral loosening, one for PJI, and one for instability. All-cause survivorship at 5 years was 92.2 and 95.1% for the cementless metal-backed implant and cemented implant cohorts, respectively. Use of a compression molded highly porous metal-backed patella component demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic results at 5-year follow-up. Longer follow-up is required to evaluate the ability of highly porous cementless patella implants to provide durable long-term fixation.

New Horizons of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Considering the increasing number of young and active patients needing TKA, orthopedic surgeons are looking for a long-lasting and physiological bond for the prosthetic implant. Multiple advantages have been associated with cementless fixation including higher preservation of the native bone stock, avoidance of cement debris with subsequent potential third-body wear, and the achievement of a natural bond and osseointegration between the implant and the bone that will provide a durable and stable fixation.

DISCUSSION

Innovations in technology and design have helped modern cementless TKA implants to improve dramatically. Better coefficient of friction and reduced Young's modulus mismatch between the implant and host bone have been related to the use of porous metal surfaces. Moreover, biologically active coatings have been used on modern implants such as periapatite and hydroxyapatite. These factors have increased the potential for ingrowth by reducing micromotion and increasing osteoconductive properties. New materials with better biocompatibility, porosity, and roughness have been introduced to increase implant stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Innovations in technology and design have helped modern cementless TKA implants improve primary stability in both the femur and tibia. This means that short-term follow-up are comparable to cemented. These positive prognostic factors may lead to a future in which cementless fixation may be considered the gold-standard technique in young and active patients.

Cementless metal-backed patellar components in primary total knee arthroplasty using an implant of modern design

Aims

The use of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components has increased during the past decade. The initial design of cementless metal-backed patellar components had shown high failure rates due to many factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of a second-generation cementless, metal-backed patellar component of a modern design.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of 707 primary TKAs in 590 patients from a single institution, using a cementless, metal-backed patellar component with a mean follow-up of 6.9 years (2 to 12). A total of 409 TKAs were performed in 338 females and 298 TKAs in 252 males. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (34 to 87) and their mean BMI was 34.3 kg/m2 (18.8 to 64.5). The patients were chosen to undergo a cementless procedure based on age and preoperative radiological and intraoperative bone quality. Outcome was assessed using the Knee Society knee and function scores and range of motion (ROM), complications, and revisions.

Results

A total of 24 TKAs (3.4%) in 24 patients failed and required revision surgery, of which five were due to patellar complications (0.71%): one for aseptic patellar loosening (0.14%) and four for polyethylene dissociation (0.57%). A total of 19 revisions (2.7%) were undertaken in 19 patients for indications which did not relate to the patella: four for aseptic tibial loosening (0.57%), one for aseptic femoral loosening (0.14%), nine for periprosthetic infection (1.3%), one for popliteus impingement (0.14%), and four for instability (0.57%). Knee Society knee and function scores, and ROM, improved significantly when comparing pre- and postoperative values. Survival of the metal-backed patellar component for all-cause failure was 97.5% (95% confidence interval 94.9% to 100%) at 12 years.

Conclusion

The second-generation cementless TKA design of metal-backed patellar components showed a 97.5% survival at 12 years, with polyethylene dissociation from the metal-backing being the most common cause of patellar failure. In view of the increased use of TKA, especially in younger, more active, or obese patients, these findings are encouraging at mean follow-up of seven years.

Postoperative Hemodynamics of Total Knee Arthroplasty Unaffected by Cementless Approach under Contemporary Patient Blood Management Protocol: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

(1) Background: A cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a recent and an increasingly popular innovation that enhances porous fixation surfaces. However, the lack of cemented sealing of an exposed resected bone has raised concerns about the potential for greater blood loss. The goals of this study were to determine if a cementless approach impacts post-TKA hemodynamics and to identify risk factors for blood loss in instances of cementless (vs. cemented) TKAs under a contemporary patient blood management (PBM) protocol. (2) Methods: We recruited 153 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral TKAs between 2019 and 2023. All enrollees received cementless or cemented prostheses of the same design (cementless, 87; cemented, 66). After propensity score matching for demographics, there were 46 patients in each group. We then compared blood loss metrics (total [TBL] and estimated [EBL]), drainage volumes, hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and transfusion rates by group. (3) Results: Post-TKA hemodynamics (i.e., TBL, EBL, drainage, Hb level, and transfusion rate) of cementless (n = 46) and cemented (n = 46) TKA groups did not differ significantly. In addition, the proportions of patients with Hb drops > 3.0 g/dL were similar for the two groups. A logistic regression analysis revealed that only preoperative Hb and EBL during the early postoperative period were predictive of a substantial fall in Hb levels. The fixation method was not associated with Hb decline > 3.0 g/dL by postoperative Day 3. (4) Conclusion: The cementless TKA has no impact on customary post-TKA hemodynamics and is not associated with greater TKA-related blood loss when implementing a contemporary PBM protocol.

A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cemented, Uncemented, or Hybrid Techniques

In this study, we aim to explore the differences among the three types of fixation methods for the components of the knee joint in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These methods are cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation. Cemented fixation means that a special type of grout is used to attach the components to the bone. Uncemented fixation means that the components are designed to fit tightly into the bone and allow new bone growth to secure them. Hybrid fixation means that a combination of cemented and uncemented fixation is used for different components. We searched four online databases to find studies relevant to our research question. We use the R program (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) for network meta-analysis (NMA) to analyze the data from the studies. We calculate the mean difference (MD) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome, which are statistical measures of the difference and the uncertainty between methods. We use these measures for continuous outcomes, meaning they can have any value. For dichotomous outcomes, meaning they can only have two values, we use the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% CI, which are statistical measures of the relative risk and the uncertainty between methods. We assess the quality of randomized controlled trials, which are studies that randomly assign participants to different methods, using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 1, a tool that evaluates the potential biases in the studies. We include 21 studies, and our analysis shows that cemented TKA reveals a statistically significant decrease in pain with hybrid TKA (MD = -2.82). That said, we find no significant differences between uncemented and cemented or hybrid (MD = -0.80 and -2.02, respectively). The results show that there is no significant difference between uncemented TKA and cemented TKA or hybrid technique (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.35-2.14; RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.22-2.39, respectively). Also, we find no significant difference between cemented TKA and hybrid TKA (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.24-2.93). Cemented TKA is associated with a lower risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) incidence rate. Moreover, it shows a significant decrease in pain compared to hybrid TKA. Future research is needed to compare among the three interventions.

A prospective randomised controlled trial of cemented and uncemented tibial baseplates: functional and radiological outcomes

INTRODUCTION

With the success of uncemented fixation in younger patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and the growing demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a younger cohort of patients, there has been an increasing interest in cementless tibial baseplate fixation. We sought to determine whether there was a clear advantage to the use of three different forms of tibial baseplate fixation. The primary outcome of this study was survivorship and secondary outcomes were functional and radiological outcomes, up until 10 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a randomised controlled trial and recruited 224 patients with 274 knees. Patients underwent TKA by a single surgeon utilising a standard surgical technique. All patients received a cruciate retaining TKA with a cementless femoral component, and were randomised to receive either a cemented tibial component, a pegged porous coated cementless tibial component with screws or a cementless tantalum monoblock tibial component with pegs. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS), radiological data and survivorship were assessed until 10 years post-operatively.

RESULTS

Pre-operative range of motion, alignment and PROMS were similar between the three groups. The use of cemented, cementless with screws or cementless with pegs fixation options, lead to differences in functional outcomes. There was greater improvement in the Oxford score and Knee Society Score in patients who received a cemented baseplate compared to tantalum and the pegged porous groups. However, radiological and survival outcomes were similar in all three groups. Overall survivorship was 99.6%, with one knee with cementless tibial fixation and screws revised for subsidence at 3 years. There were no cases of venous thromboembolism, periprosthetic fracture or infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of tibial fixation method, functional and radiological outcomes remain similar at follow-up at 10 years, with no clear difference in outcome between each group. Each method of fixation also had excellent survivorship over this period and should reassure surgeons that whichever method of fixation they choose, long-term outcomes are likely to be satisfactory.

No Blood Loss Increase in Cementless vs. Cemented Fixation Following Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Background and Objectives: Recent advancements in three-dimensional printing technology have enhanced the biologic fixation of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA), therefore increasing the utilization of newer-generation cementless implants. However, the lack of sealing and tamponade effect of cement on the resected bone surface after cementless TKA raises concerns regarding the potential for greater blood loss compared to cemented TKA. The aim of this study was to (1) compare blood loss and transfusion rates between cementless and cemented TKAs and (2) identify the risk factor for higher blood loss in patients who underwent 1-week-interval staggered bilateral (SB) TKA. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, propensity-matched study included 54 cementless and 53 cemented SB TKAs performed by a single surgeon from 2019 to 2023 with a single implant that has similar design features in both cementless and cemented implants. All patients underwent 1-week-interval SB TKA and received the same patient blood management (PBM) and rehabilitation protocol. The estimated total blood loss (TBL), transfusion rate, and total hemoglobin drop were assessed. Patients were categorized according to TBL into average TBL and higher TBL groups. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for higher blood loss. Results: There was no difference in TBL between cementless and cemented TKA groups (1233 ± 299 and 1282 ± 309 mL, respectively; p > 0.05). In addition, no between-group differences in the transfusion rate and mean total hemoglobin drop were observed. The logistic regression analyses revealed that whether TKA was cementless or cemented was not associated with higher blood loss; rather, the only identified risk factor was the pre-TKA patient blood volume (odd ratio 1.001, 95% confidence interval 1.000-1002, p = 0.026). Conclusions: Contemporary cementless fixation does not increase blood loss or transfusion rates compared to cemented fixation in patients undergoing 1-week-interval staggered bilateral TKA.

Cementless Compared to Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With More Revisions Within 1 Year of Index Surgery

Background

Cementless total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) have gained renewed interest due to improved implant designs and lower rates of revision than its cemented counterparts. The purpose of this study was to compare revision rates between cemented vs cementless TKAs within 1 year of primary arthroplasty.

Methods

This was a retrospective review from the PearlDiver Patient Record Database. International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients who had undergone cemented and cementless TKAs and subsequent surgical revisions. An unadjusted univariate analysis of patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and surgical revisions at 90 days and 1 year after TKA was performed using chi-squared testing. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were subsequently performed for 1-year surgical complications requiring revision.

Results

Of 324,508 patients, 312,988 (96.45%) underwent cemented TKAs, and 11,520 (3.55%) underwent cementless TKAs. Patients undergoing cementless TKA tended to be younger than patients undergoing cemented TKA (63.67 ± 9.15 cementless vs 66.22 ± 8.85 cemented, P < .001). Univariate chi-squared testing showed that cementless patients were more likely to require 1-component femoral or tibial revision at 90 days and 1 year, irrigation and debridement at 90 days and 1 year, and arthroscopy with lysis of adhesions at 1 year only. Similar findings were observed for these 3 revision procedures at 1 year after correcting for age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score using multivariate logistic regression analysis as cementless TKA patients had higher odds ratios for each of the revisions.

Conclusions

Small but significant differences were found in surgical revisions among cementless TKAs when compared to cemented TKAs within 1 year of the index procedure.

Cementless Metal-Backed Patellar Components in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Average 10-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Historically, 1st generation metal-backed cementless patellar implants demonstrated high failure rates due to multiple factors. The 2nd generation cementless implants were developed with purported improvements in component design and polyethylene wear characteristics. This study evaluated clinical results of a current generation cementless metal-backed patellar implant with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-six primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with metal-backed cementless patellae were compared to 183 cemented patellae with the same implant design. The cementless group mean age was 61 years (range, 40 to 81), mean body mass index (BMI) of 34.9 (range, 22.6 to 64.5), and mean follow-up of 10 years (range, 5 to 13). The cemented group mean age was 65 years (range, 32 to 89), mean BMI of 32.5 (range, 18.2 to 56.6), and mean follow-up of 10 years (range, 5 to 12). Significant demographic differences of age (P < .001), BMI (P < .01), and sex (P < .001) were found, with cementless patients being younger, heavier, and with more men.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in non-revision procedures (P = .214), TKA revisions (P = .639), patellar revisions (P = .151), and patellar aseptic loosening (P = .737). The 10-year survivorship of the cementless metal-backed patella was 95.9% with all-cause failure as the endpoint. The 10-year survivorship of the cemented patellar component was 98.9%.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated noninferiority of a 2nd generation HA-coated cementless metal-backed patellar implant in primary TKA compared to cemented patellae with 10-year survivorship of 95.9%. Advances in implant design and polyethylene wear properties have led to improved clinical results with metal-backed patellar components in primary TKA.

Is Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty Safe in Women Over 75 Y of Age?

BACKGROUND

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the subject of renewed interest. Previous concerns about survivorship have been addressed and there is an appeal in terms of biological fixation and surgical efficiency. However, even surgeon advocates have concerns about the risk of marked subsidence when using this technology in older patients at risk for osteoporosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 1,000 consecutive fully cementless mobile bearing TKAs performed at a single institution on women over 75 years of age who had postoperative and 1-year x-rays. The primary outcome was the incidence of subsidence.

RESULTS

There were three asymptomatic cases with definite subsidence and change in alignment. In a fourth symptomatic case, the femoral component subsided into varus and the tibia into valgus, thus maintaining alignment which facilitated nonoperative treatment in a 92-year-old. Overall, at 1 year, there were two- liner revisions for infection without recurrence. Five patients had further surgery, of which three were washouts and two were for periprosthetic fractures sustained postoperatively within 1 year. Seven patients had further anesthesia, of which five were manipulations and two were nonrecurrent closed reductions for spinouts.

CONCLUSION

Cementless TKA did not have a high risk of subsidence in this at-risk population. In the hands of experienced surgeons, these procedures can be used safely irrespective of bone quality.

Cementless Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty: 10 Years Follow-Up

Background Although most TKR surgeries are cemented, the interest in cementless TKR has increased dramatically during the last few years because of the new generation of cementless prostheses and the increased number of young patients who need TKR. Methods Ten years of retrospective reviews of 80 patients who had cementless, complete rotating platform TKR (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, Indiana) were performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age (above and below 70 years old). Functional outcomes at the final follow-up were evaluated clinically by filling out a satisfaction form, and the Oxford Knee Score as well as all medical and surgical complications were recorded for each patient. Results The 10-year cumulative implant survival rate was 100%, i.e. no patients had revision surgeries with no significant statistical difference between the two age groups. The 10-year evaluation rate was 90%. Conclusion The use of cementless TKA exhibited good survivability, long-term clinical and functional results, and no implant revision in various age groups, as well as a high satisfaction rate. There was no statistically significant difference between the results of different age groups.

Early Survivorship of Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Varies by Age and Sex based on Data from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative

BACKGROUND

Outcome data for newer uncemented total knee arthroplasty designs has been mixed. Registry studies showed worse survivorship, but clinical trials have not demonstrated differences compared to cemented designs. There has been renewed interest in uncemented TKA with modern designs and improved technology. The utilizations of uncemented knees in Michigan, 2-year outcomes, and the effects of age and sex were evaluated.

METHODS

A statewide database from 2017 through 2019 was analyzed for incidence, distribution, and early survivorship of cemented vs. uncemented TKAs. There was 2-year minimum follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to generate time to first revision cumulative percent revision (CPR) curves. The impacts of age and sex were examined.

RESULTS

Use of uncemented TKAs increased from 7.0 to 11.3%. Uncemented TKAs were more commonly men, younger, heavier, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score>2, and opioid users (p<0.05). At 2 years, overall CPR was higher in uncemented (2.44% [2.00, 2.99] versus cemented (1.76% [1.64, 1.89]), particularly in women (uncemented (2.41 [1.87, 3.12]) vs cemented (1.64 [1.50, 1.80]). Revision rates were greater with uncemented women >70 years (1.2% 1 year, 1.02% 2 years) vs <70 years (0.56%, 0.53%), notably uncemented were inferior in both groups (p<0.05). Men, regardless of age, had similar survivorships with both cemented and uncemented designs.

CONCLUSION

The use of an uncemented TKA had an increased risk of early revision compared to cemented. This finding, however, was only apparent in women, especially those >70 years old. Surgeons should consider cement fixation in women >70 years.

Uncemented Tibial Fixation Has Comparable Prognostic Outcomes and Safety Versus Cemented Fixation in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Cemented and uncemented fixation are the primary methods of tibial prosthesis fixation in total knee arthroplasty. However, the optimal fixation method remains controversial. This article explored whether uncemented tibial fixation has better clinical and radiological outcomes, fewer complications, and revision rates compared to cemented tibial fixation.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to September 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared uncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and cemented TKA. The outcome assessment consisted of clinical and radiological outcomes, complications (aseptic loosening, infection, and thrombosis), and revision rate. Subgroup analysis was used to explore the effects of different fixation methods on knee scores in younger patients.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs were finally analyzed with 686 uncemented knees and 678 cemented knees. The mean follow-up time was 12.6 years. The pooled data revealed significant advantages of uncemented fixations over cemented fixations in terms of the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) (p = 0.01) and the Knee Society Score-Pain (KSS-Pain) (p = 0.02). Cemented fixations showed significant advantages in maximum total point motion (MTPM) (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between uncemented fixation and cemented fixation regarding functional outcomes, range of motion, complications, and revision rates. When comparing among young people (<65 years), the differences in KSKS became statistically insignificant. No significant difference was shown in aseptic loosening and the revision rate among young patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence shows better knee score, less pain, comparable complications and revision rates for uncemented tibial prosthesis fixation, compared to cemented, in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty Over the Past Decade: Excellent Survivorship in Contemporary Designs

BACKGROUND

Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is re-emerging due to improvements in biomaterials, surgical technique, and implant design. Albeit rare, failure of osseointegration typically occurs within the first 2 years, and limited data exist on survivorship of the modern cementless TKA designs. This study evaluated clinical survivorship of 2 contemporary cementless TKA designs at minimum 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 627 cementless TKAs were performed up to July 2022. Three hundred thirty-nine cases were eligible for 2-year follow-up. Indications centered around bone quality and involved predominantly younger patients. The 2 designs consisted of tibial components with a highly porous titanium ingrowth surface, a central keel, and peripheral cruciform pegs with a porous cobalt-chromium femur. Survivorship estimates were calculated using right-censored non-parametric Kaplan-Meier methodologies. A total of 226 TKAs obtained minimum 2-year follow-up with a mean of 3.6 years (range, 2 to 10).

RESULTS

The all-cause revision rate was 2.4% (8 of 339). The revision rate due to aseptic loosening was 0.6% (2 of 339) consisting of 2 femoral components. No tibial components were revised for aseptic loosening. Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from aseptic loosening was 99% (95% confidence interval 98 to 100) at a maximum of 10 years.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate encouraging survivorship of cementless fixation in primary TKA with use of contemporary ingrowth biomaterials and modern implant designs. This particular tibial implant design with a highly porous titanium fixation surface, central keel, and peripheral cruciform pegs demonstrated excellent clinical survivorship without failure which may portend superior fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV-case series, no control group/historical control group.

Effect of Tobacco Use on Radiolucent Lines in Modern Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty Tibial Components

Background

The link between tobacco consumption and wound complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is well established. However, the effect of tobacco use on biologic fixation in cementless TKA remains unknown. This study evaluated the influence of tobacco use on the presence of radiolucent lines of tibial components in cementless TKA.

Methods

A total of 293 consecutive cementless TKAs of 2 contemporary designs were retrospectively reviewed. Tibial radiolucent lines and component alignment were measured using an established measurement protocol. Patients with any history of tobacco use or active tobacco use (tobacco users) were compared to those with no history of tobacco use (tobacco nonusers). No significant differences which influenced outcomes were detected between the tobacco user and tobacco nonuser groups (P ≥ .071).

Results

Radiolucent lines decreased from 1-month to latest follow-up (mean 2.5 years) in all 10 radiographic zones regardless of tobacco use (P ≤ .084). However, evaluating intrapatient change in radiolucent line width, the tobacco nonuser group had more radiolucent lines resolve by the latest follow-up in nearly all radiographic zones, although most differences did not reach statistical significance, except for anteroposterior zone 1 (-31% vs -19%, P = .022). No tibial components were revised for aseptic loosening.

Conclusions

Results from this study suggest that any tobacco use prior to cementless TKA has the potential to hinder biologic fixation of tibial components. While no tibial components were revised for aseptic loosening, follow-up was relatively short at 2.5 years and therefore warrants further study to discern the effect of persistent radiolucent lines on long-term fixation.

Femoral and tibial cementless fixation neither increases blood loss nor impedes early functional recovery: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Whether cementless fixation on femoral and tibial components increases blood loss during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is unclear. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare blood loss and early functional recovery between patients who underwent cementless or cemented TKA.

Methods

Between November 2021 and April 2022, sixty-one eligible patients at our medical center were randomized to cementless and cemented group. The primary outcome was total blood loss (TBL). Secondary outcomes were drainage, knee swelling, anemia, transfusion, hematological indicators, early functional recovery, and postoperative complications. The early functional recovery included range of motion (ROM), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, walking distance.

Results

A total of 61 patients were analyzed, of whom 30 underwent cementless fixation. On postoperative day 1, the mean TBL was 394.39 ml (SD 182.97 ml) in the cementless group and 382.41 ml (SD 208.67 ml) in the cemented group (P = 0.863). By postoperative day 3, the corresponding mean TBL was higher at 593.48 ml (SD 230.04 ml) and 603.80 ml (SD 213.16 ml) (P = 0.751). The two groups did not differ significantly in drainage, knee swelling, anemia, levels of hemoglobin or hematocrit or platelets, ROM, HSS score, walking distance, or rates of transfusion or postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Cementless fixation on femoral and tibial components during TKA does not increase blood loss or impede early functional recovery, which suggests that clinicians need not worry about blood loss and early functional recovery when deciding what type of fixation to perform during TKA.

Trial registration

Number: ChiCTR2100052857; Date: November 6, 2021.

Trends in Total Knee Arthroplasty Cementing Technique Among Arthroplasty Surgeons-A Survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Members

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening persists as one of the leading causes of failure following cemented primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Cement technique may impact implant fixation. We hypothesized that there is variability in TKA cement technique among arthroplasty surgeons.

METHODS

A 28-question survey regarding variables in surgeons' preferred TKA cementation technique was distributed to 2,791 current American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) members with a response rate of 30.8% (903 respondents). Patterns of responses were analyzed by grouping respondents by their answers to certain questions including cementing technique, tibial cement location, and femoral cement location.

RESULTS

A total of 73.5% reported performing at least 7 of 8 of the highest consensus techniques, including vacuum mixing (79.9%), using two bags (76.1%), tibial implant first (95.2%), single-stage cementing (96.9%), compression of the implants in extension (91.7%), and use of a tourniquet (84.3%). Medium and high viscosity cement was most commonly used (37.9 and 37.8%, respectively). Finger pressurization was most common (76.1%) compared to a gun (29.8%). There were 26.5% of respondents performing 6 or fewer of the most common majority techniques and seemed to perform other less common techniques (eg, use of a single bag of cement, trialing or closure prior to cement curing, and heating to accelerate cement curing). Cement was most commonly applied to the entire bone and implant surface on both the tibia (46.4%) and femur (47.7%), leaving much variation in the remaining cement application location responses.

DISCUSSION

There appears to be variability in cemented TKA technique among arthroplasty surgeons. There were 26.5% of respondents performing less of the majority techniques and also performed other additional low-response rate techniques. Further studies that look at the impacts of variation in techniques on outcomes may be warranted. Our study demonstrates the need for defining best practices for cement technique given the substantial variability identified.

The Evolution, Current Indications and Outcomes of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been performed by orthopedic surgeons for decades, but the cementless TKA has only recently gained much interest in the world of arthroplasty. Initially, early designs had multiple complications, particularly with aseptic loosening due to osteolysis and micromotion. However, modifications have shown good outcomes and excellent survivorship. Over the last several decades, changes in implant designs as well as implant materials/coatings have helped with bone in growth and stability. Furthermore, surgeons have been performing TKA in younger and more obese patients as these populations have been increasing. Good results from the cementless TKA compared to cemented TKA may be a better option in these more challenging populations, as several studies have shown greater survivorship in patients that are younger and have a greater BMI. Additionally, a cementless TKA may be more cost effective, which remains a concern in today's healthcare environment. Overall, cemented and cementless TKA have great results in modern times and there is still a debate as to which implant is superior.

The mid-term survival of cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of the ACS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty

Background

Till today, Cemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is significantly more used than Hybrid or Uncemented Fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare Cemented, Uncemented and Hybrid Fixation of the ACS Mobile Bearing TKA at Mid-term follow-up.

Methods

This study was an extended data report of our prospective single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial comprising 105 patients. The primary outcome was survival at five years of follow-up calculated by Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank test. The secondary outcome was function based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Results

Eighty-three patients were included, of which 25 belonged into group A (Cemented), 28 in group B (Uncemented), and 30 in group C (Hybrid). Mean follow-up was 5.8 ± 0.7 (range 5-7) years. The 5-year survival rates were 96.8% (95%CI: 90.5; 100) in the Cemented group, 94.2% (95%CI: 86.4; 100) in the Uncemented group, and 93.8% (95%CI: 85.4; 100) in the Hybrid group for revision for any reason (p = 0.80). Functional outcome was similar among the groups.

Conclusion

In our cohort of ACS Mobile Bearing TKA, there was no difference between Cemented, Uncemented, and Hybrid Fixation with regard to survival and function at Mid-term follow-up.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Register (NTR3893), 2013-03-12.

Level of evidence

II.

Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Shows Less Blood Loss but a Higher Rate of Aseptic Loosening Compared With Cementless Fixation: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to update the current evidence on functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates between cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by evaluating comparative studies published over the past 15 years.

METHODS

The PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central databases were used to search keywords and a total of 18 studies were included. Random and fixed effect models were used for the meta-analysis of pooled mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

A total of 5,222 patients were identified with a mean age of 64.4 ± 9.4 and 63 ± 8.6 years for the cemented and cementless TKA groups, respectively. The mean follow-up was 107.9 ± 30 and 104.3 ± 10 months for the cemented and cementless TKA groups, respectively. Cemented TKA showed a significantly greater postoperative Knee Society Score (MD = -0.95, 95% CI [-1.57, 0.33], P = .003) and range of motion (MD = -1.09, 95% CI [-1.88, -0.29], P = .0007), but no differences in other outcome scores were found. The incidence of periprosthetic joint infection, radiolucent lines, instability, and polyethylene wear was also comparable. Cemented TKA showed less perioperative blood loss (SMD = -438.41, 95% CI [-541.69, -35.14], P < .0001) but a higher rate of manipulation under anesthesia (OR = 3.39, 95% CI [1.64, 6.99], P = .001) and aseptic loosening (OR = 1.62, 95% CI [1.09, 2.41], P = .02) than cementless TKA. No differences were found in terms of the reoperation rate.

CONCLUSION

When cemented and cementless fixations are compared in primary TKA, comparable functional outcomes and reoperation rates can be achieved. Cemented TKA showed less blood loss but a higher rate of manipulation under anesthesia and aseptic loosening.

Press-Fit Dual-Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early Results With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Ultracongruent (UC) tibial bearings are being used with increasing frequency in the United States. Evidence suggests that the use of certain UC bearings may lead to improved patient satisfaction when compared with using conventional inserts. However, little is known as to what effect the use of UC tibial inserts has on bone ingrowth in uncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine the early clinical and radiographic results of TKA using a press-fit dual-pivot design.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2019, a consecutive series of 232 TKAs were implanted using a press-fit tibial and femoral component and a UC dual-pivot tibial insert. Sixty-two percent of patients were male. The average age was 56 years. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (range, 24-42 months) using KOOS-JR and Knee Society clinical and radiographic evaluation.

RESULTS

No patient had more than mild knee stiffness at the final follow-up. Two patients reported moderate knee pain with stair climbing. All other patients reported either mild or no pain with activity. Knee Society pain scores averaged 42 points. Flexion averaged 118 degrees. Three knees (1.3%) were revised (one each for flexion instability, tibial plateau fracture, and suspected femoral component loosening). No other cases of femoral or tibial loosening were identified.

CONCLUSION

Although the success of uncemented TKA is determined by a variety of factors, the use of this dual-pivot knee design did not appear to influence tibial or femoral component fixation at early follow-up, yielding acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Redefining Indications for Modern Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship in Patients >75 Years Old

BACKGROUND

Most studies on cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have excluded patients >75 years due to concerns that older patients have poorer bone mineral density and osteogenic activity. This study compared the midterm outcomes and survivorship of cemented and cementless TKA of the same modern design performed in patients >75 years.

METHODS

We identified a consecutive series of 120 primary cementless TKA performed in patients >75 years. Each case was propensity score matched 1:3 with 360 cemented TKA of the same modern design based on age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, bilateral procedures, liner type, and year of surgery. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) were collected preoperatively, at 6 months and 2 years. Implant survivorship was recorded at mean 4.2 years (range, 2.0-7.9).

RESULTS

Mean age was 79.0 ± 3.4 years (range, 75-92) in the cemented cohort and 78.9 ± 3.5 (range, 75-91) in the cementless cohort (P = .769). There was no difference in final postoperative scores or improvement in scores at 2 years. The percentage of patients that met the minimal clinically important difference was also similar (KOOS-JR, 68.9% vs 69.2%, P = .955; SF-12 Physical, 71.7% vs 66.7%, P = .299). Seven-year survivorship free from aseptic revision was 99.4% for cemented knees and 100% for cementless knees (log-rank, P = .453).

CONCLUSION

Patients over 75 years undergoing cementless or cemented TKA of the same modern design had comparable outcomes and survivorship in the midterm. The theoretical risks of cementless fixation in this age group were not realized in this study.

What Are the All-Cause Survivorship Rates and Functional Outcomes in Patients Younger Than 55 Years Undergoing Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Approximately one-fourth of TKAs will be performed in patients 55 years or younger within the next decade. Postoperative outcomes for younger patients who had a knee arthroplasty were systematically reviewed in 2011; however, numerous studies evaluating young patients who had both a TKA and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have been reported in the past decade. Therefore, to better counsel this growing population of young patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, an updated understanding of their expected postoperative outcomes is warranted.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review, we evaluated (1) all-cause survivorship, (2) reasons for revision, (3) patient-reported outcomes, and (4) return to physical activity and sport in patients 55 years or younger undergoing primary TKA or UKA.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, SportDiscus, and CINAHL was performed to identify all original studies evaluating outcomes after primary knee arthroplasty for young patients (55 years of age or younger) from inception until March 2021. The following keywords were used: knee, arthroplasty, replacement, pain, function, revision, survivorship, sport, physical activity, and return to play. Only original research studies that were related to knee arthroplasty and reported postoperative outcomes with a minimum 1-year follow-up for patients 55 years or younger were included. Unpublished materials, publications not available in English, and studies with a primary diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score was used to evaluate the study quality of case series and comparative studies, while the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Jadad scale were used for randomized studies. The primary outcomes of interest for this study were all-cause survivorship rate, reasons for all-cause revision, Knee Society and Knee Society Function scores (minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 7.2 and 9.7, respectively), WOMAC scores (MCID 10), Tegner scores (no reported MCID for knee arthroplasty), and return to physical activity or sport. Knee Society and Knee Society Function scores range from 0 to 100, with scores from 85 to 100 considered excellent and below 60 representing poor outcomes. All-cause survivorship rate and reasons for revision were both reported in 17 total studies. Knee Society scores were presented in 19 and Knee Society Function scores were reported in 18 included studies. WOMAC scores and Tegner scores were each found in four included studies, and return to physical activity and return to sport analyses were performed in seven studies. Overall, 21 TKA studies and five UKA studies were included in this analysis, featuring 3095 TKA knees and 482 UKA knees.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier estimates of all-cause survivorship ranged from 90% to 98% at 5 to 10 years of follow-up after TKA and from 84% to 99% (95% CI 93% to 98%) at 10 years to 20 years post-TKA. All-cause UKA survivorship was 90% at 10 years and 75% at 19 years in the largest Kaplan-Meier estimate of survivorship for patients younger than 55 who underwent UKA. Common reasons for revision in TKA patients were polyethylene wear/loosening, aseptic tibial loosening, and infection, and in UKA patients the common reasons for revision were knee pain, aseptic loosening, progression of knee osteoarthritis, and polyethylene wear/loosening. Knee Society scores ranged from 85 to 98 for 5-year to 10-year follow-up and ranged from 86 to 97 at 10-year to 20-year follow-up in TKA patients. Knee Society Function scores ranged from 70 to 95 for 5-year to 10-year follow-up and ranged from 79 to 86 at 10-year to 20-year follow-up. Return to physical activity and sport was reported variably; however, most patients younger than 55 have improved physical activity levels after knee arthroplasty relative to preoperative levels.

CONCLUSION

Although all-cause survivorship rates were frequently above 90% and patient-reported outcome scores were generally in the good to excellent range, several studies reported long-term survivorship rates from 70% to 85% and fair patient-reported outcome scores, which must be factored into any preoperative counseling with patients. We could not control for surgeon volume in this report, and prior research suggests that increasing volume is associated with less frequent complications; in addition, the studies we included were variably affected by selection bias, transfer bias, and assessment bias, which makes it likely that the findings of our review represent best-case estimates. To limit the frequency of revision in patients younger than 55 years undergoing TKA, clinicians should be cautious of polyethylene wear/loosening, aseptic tibial loosening, and infection, while knee pain and progression of knee osteoarthritis are also common reasons for revision in patients younger than 55 undergoing UKA. Further research should isolate younger knee arthroplasty patients and evaluate postoperative activity levels while accounting for preoperative physical activity and sport participation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: the ROSA knee system

INTRODUCTION

The ROSA (Robotic Surgical Assistant) Knee system (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be considered as collaborative robotics, where the surgeon remains in charge of the procedure and collaborates with a smart robotic tool, to perform the surgery with a high accuracy and reproducibility. The aim was to describe: (1) its concept and surgical technique; (2) its advantages and potential limits; (3) the early experience with this system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The goal during its development phase was to keep the surgeon active and at the center of the operation: the surgeon handles the saw and performs the cuts while the robotic arm places and holds the guide at the right place. The ROSA knee platform assists the surgeon for the distal femoral cut, the femoral component sizing and positioning, the tibial cut and the ligament balance. This robotic system has two options: image-based with 3D virtual model; or image-less, based on intraoperative landmarks acquisition. All the classic surgical techniques can be used: measured resection, gap balancing, functional alignment, kinematic alignment. Some techniques recently developed are more ROSA-specific: Robotic personalized TKA, ROSA-FuZion technique.

RESULTS

Its advantages as compared to other available systems include: radiographs in standing position, collaborative robotic system where the robot completes the surgeon skills, "off-the-shelf" implants, predictive robotic with concept of machine learning incorporated into the system. Two cadaveric studies have reported the high accuracy and reproducibility of this device. This robotic system is recent and currently no clinical series has enough follow-up to report clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The ROSA knee system is a robotically assisted semi-autonomous surgical system with some specific characteristics. The aim of this collaborative robotic system is to improve the accuracy and reliability of the bone resections and the ligament balancing, without replacing the steps well performed by the surgeon.

Long-term effects of cemented and cementless fixations of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

To determine the long-term effects (a minimum follow-up time 8.8 years) of cemented and cementless fixations used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and China Wangfang database were interrogated for appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through July 2020. Data were extracted and assessed for accuracy by 2 of the authors acting independently. Any controversial discrepancies were resolved after discussion with a third author.

RESULT

Eight RCTs were included with low to moderate bias risks. The cemented fixation of TKA was comparable to cementless fixation in terms of implant survival (relative risk, 1.016; 95% CI 0.978 to 1.056; P = 0.417), Knee Society (KS) knee score (standardized mean difference (SMD), - 0.107; 95% CI - 0.259 to 0.045; P = 0.168), KS function score (SMD - 0.065; 95% CI - 0.238 to 0.109; P = 0.463), KS pain score (SMD - 0.300; 95% CI - 0.641 to 0.042; P = 0.085), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (SMD - 0.117; 95% CI - 0.307 to 0.073; P = 0.227), HSS score (SMD - 0.027; 95% CI - 0.270 to 0.217; P = 0.829), range of motion (SMD 0.061; 95% CI - 0.205 to 0.327; P = 0.652) at ≥ 8.8 years of follow-up. In terms of radiographic outcomes at ≥ 8.8 years of follow-up, the incidence of a radiolucent line in the cementless group was lower than for the cemented group (SMD 3.828; 95% CI 2.228 to 6.576; P < 0.001). However, the maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the cementless group was greater than for the cemented group (SMD - 0.739; 95% CI - 1.474 to - 0.005; P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up verified that cementless and cemented fixation have similar prosthesis survival rates, clinical scores and mobility. However, radiography suggested that each technique had an advantage with regard to the radiolucent line and MTPM.

Comparable mid-term revision rates of primary cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasties in 201,211 cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007-2017)

PURPOSE

Long-term failure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is mostly due to loosening of the prosthesis. In this study, the short- and mid-term revision rates of cemented vs cementless TKAs were investigated. Comparable short- and mid-term survival rates of both fixation methods were expected.

METHODS

Data on all cemented and cementless TKAs performed between 2007 and 2017 were retrieved from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. The cumulative crude incidence of revision of cemented and cementless TKA was calculated. Death was considered a competing risk. Revision rates were compared using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. The associations between fixation method and type of revision or reason for revision were tested using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 190,651 (94.8%) cemented and 10,560 (5.3%) cementless TKAs were evaluated. Both groups had comparable case characteristics. Cemented TKAs were inserted more often in cases with previous knee surgery compared to cementless TKAs (32% vs 27%). The cumulative incidence of revision after 9 years was 5.5% (CI 5.3-5.6%) for cemented and 5.8% (CI 5.2-6.4%) for cementless TKAs (p = 0.2). Cementless TKAs were more often revised due to loosening of the tibial (27% vs 18%; p < 0.001) or the femoral component (7% vs 5%; p = 0.005) than cemented TKAs. Cemented TKAs were more often revised due to infection (17% vs 9%; p = 0.004) than cementless TKAs.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, cemented and cementless TKAs have comparable short- and mid-term revision rates based on a nationwide register study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Evaluating Long Term Outcomes and Survivorship of Cruciate Retaining and Sacrificing Knee Replacements Done for Degenerative Arthritis in Patients Under 55 Years

BACKGROUND

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is the gold standard of treatment for end stage arthritis not responding to conservative treatment. With a recent increase in the younger population presenting with osteoarthritis (OA) we undertook this study to evaluate long-term outcomes and survivorship of TKA in this cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study cohort included 328 patients, < 55 years, with OA, who underwent TKA using Cruciate Retaining (CR), and Posterior Stabilized (PS) implants with a minimum follow up of 15 years. Revision surgery was the end point of our analysis and Kaplan-Meier evaluation of survivorship was measured. Knee Society Scores (KSS) and Range of Motion (ROM) were assessed to evaluate outcomes.

RESULTS

Survivorship of the CR and PS implants with revision as end point, for aseptic loosening was 97.3% and 96%, and revision for all causes was 89.7% and 86.1%, respectively, at 15 years. The outcomes of CR implants were better than the PS cohort in terms of function and survivorship.

CONCLUSION

Long term survivorship and outcome analysis of TKA in patients < 55 years showed good results with excellent survivorship, with both CR and PS implants. The CR cohort demonstrated better long-term survivorship, though the difference was not statistically significant. Deep infection and aseptic loosening were the commonest causes for failure.

Excellent mid-term follow-up for a new 3D-printed cementless total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) offers the potential for strong biological fixation compared with cemented TKA where fixation is achieved by the mechanical integration of the cement. Few mid-term results are available for newer cementless TKA designs, which have used additive manufacturing (3D printing). The aim of this study was to present mid-term clinical outcomes and implant survivorship of the cementless Stryker Triathlon Tritanium TKA.

METHODS

This was a single institution registry review of prospectively gathered data from 341 cementless Triathlon Tritanium TKAs at four to 6.8 years follow-up. Outcomes were determined by comparing pre- and postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) scores, and pre- and postoperative 12-item Veterans RAND/Short Form Health Survey (VR/SF-12) scores. Aseptic loosening and revision for any reason were the endpoints which were used to determine survivorship at five years.

RESULTS

At mid-term follow-up, the mean KOOS JR score improved significantly from 33.14 (0 t0 85, standard deviation (SD) 21.88) preoperatively to 84.12 (15.94 to 100, SD 20.51) postoperatively (p < 0.001), the mean VR/SF-12 scores improved significantly from physical health (PH), 31.21 (SD 5.32; 23.99 to 56.77) preoperatively to 42.62 (SD 10.72; 19.38 to 56.82) postoperatively (p < 0.001) and the mental health (MH), 38.15 (SD 8.17; 19.06 to 60.75) preoperatively to 55.09 (SD 9.64; 19.06 to 66.98) postoperatively (p < 0.001). A total of 11 revisions were undertaken, with an overall revision rate of 2.94%, including five for periprosthetic joint infection (1.34%), three for loosening (0.80%), two for instability (0.53%), and one for pain (0.27%). The overall survivorship was 97.06% and survivorship for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 98.40%, with a 99.5% survivorship of the 3D-printed tibial component.

CONCLUSION

This 3D-printed cementless total knee system shows excellent survivorship at mid-term follow-up. This design and the ability to obtain cementless fixation offers promise for excellent long-term durability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):32-37.

A comprehensive comparison between cementless and cemented fixation in the total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether the cement should be used in the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was still in controversy. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of two kinds of fixation.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective/retrospective observational studies from PubMed (on 2019 September), EMBASE (on 2019 September), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Web of Science (on 2019 September) were searched. Only studies followed more than 2 years was included for the review. The PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane Handbook were adopted to assess the quality of the results reported in included studies to ensure that the results of our meta-analysis were reliable and veritable. The continuous and dichotomous outcomes were collected in a standard form, and the data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 software. Finally, the results were presented in the Forest plots.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies involving 2369 patients in cementless TKA and 2654 patients in cemented TKA were included. The rate of revision was not significantly different in two groups (p = 0.55). More than eight reasons caused revision were found in our study, the aseptic loosing was the most common, followed by the periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), neither was significantly different (p = 0.88 and 0.45, respectively). While significantly better long-term functional recovery was found in cementless TKA in terms of Knee Society Function Score (p = 0.004) and manipulation under anesthesia (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Cementless fixation did not decrease the rate of revision after the total knee arthroplasty compared with the cemented fixation, while the long-term functional recovery was significantly better in the cementless group.

Greater Blood Loss in Contemporary Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty than Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty despite Tranexamic Acid Use: A Match-Controlled Retrospective Study

The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess whether tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss in cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) comparable to levels observed with cemented fixation. After exclusions from 109 consecutive TKAs, 76 cementless knees were matched to 78 cemented knees of identical implant and surgeon. Blood loss with and without TXA was compared. There was no difference between cohorts in sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification, or preoperative hemoglobin (p ≥ 0.119). Use of TXA reduced median drain output by only 205 mL in cementless knees compared to 470 mL in cemented knees (p < 0.001). Median drain output per hour was highest in cementless knees without TXA (39.5 mL) followed by cemented knees without TXA (38.2 mL), cementless knees with TXA (28.5 mL), and cemented knees with TXA (12.7 mL; p < 0.001). Hemoglobin drop and total blood loss did not differ between cohorts regardless of TXA use. Cementless fixation in TKA resulted in greater intra-articular blood loss as measured by drain output, despite the use of TXA. Further research is warranted to examine whether a higher TXA dose, TXA delivery method, or the application of bone wax sealant would mitigate blood loss in cementless TKA, and subsequently whether intra-articular blood accumulation resulting in postoperative hemarthrosis affects recovery, function, and clinical outcomes.

The 22 to 25-Year Survival of Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patients

BACKGROUND

Despite cementless total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) have potential advantages over cemented TKAs, there are conflicting results. The purpose of the present study is to determine the long-term clinical and radiographic results, the survival rate, and the prevalence of osteolysis of cemented vs cementless TKAs.

METHODS

A total of 261 patients (522 knees) who underwent bilateral simultaneous TKAs were included in the present study (mean age, 62.5 ± 5.5 years). Patients were evaluated clinically, radiographically, and also using computed tomography scans. A mean follow-up period was 23.8 years (range, 22-25 years).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the Knee Society total score, change in total score, knee function score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score in the 2 groups. In total, 8 knees (3%) were revised in the cementless group and 5 knees (2%) in the cemented group. Radiographs and computed tomography scans showed no femoral, tibial, or patellar osteolysis in either group. The rate of survival at 25 years was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92%-100%) in the cementless group and 98% (95% CI, 94%-100%) in the cemented group, with reoperation for any reason as the end point. The rate of survival at 25 years was 98% (95% CI, 94%-100%), with reoperation for aseptic loosening as the end point in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

At this length of follow-up, cementless TKA has comparable outcomes and survivorship to cemented TKA.

Cementless knee arthroplasty: a review of recent performance

Cementless knee arthroplasty has seen a recent resurgence in popularity due to conceptual advantages, including improved osseointegration providing biological fixation, increased surgical efficiency, and reduced systemic complications associated with cement impaction and wear from cement debris. Increasingly younger and higher demand patients are requiring knee arthroplasty, and as such, there is optimism cementless fixation may improve implant survivorship and functional outcomes.

Compared to cemented implants, the National Joint Registry (NJR) currently reports higher revision rates in cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but lower in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, recent studies are beginning to show excellent outcomes with cementless implants, particularly with UKA which has shown superior performance to cemented varieties. Cementless TKA has yet to show long-term benefit, and currently performs equivalently to cemented in short- to medium-term cohort studies. However, with novel concepts including 3D-printed coatings, robotic-assisted surgery, radiostereometric analysis, and kinematic or functional knee alignment principles, it is hoped they may help improve the outcomes of cementless TKA in the long-term. In addition, though cementless implant costs remain higher due to novel implant coatings, it is speculated cost-effectiveness can be achieved through greater surgical efficiency and potential reduction in revision costs. There is paucity of level one data on long-term outcomes between fixation methods and the cost-effectiveness of modern cementless knee arthroplasty.

This review explores recent literature on cementless knee arthroplasty, with regards to clinical outcomes, implant survivorship, complications, and cost-effectiveness; providing a concise update to assist clinicians on implant choice.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(1):48–57.

Cemented vs. cementless fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Over 100,000 total knee replacements (TKRs) are carried out in the UK annually, with cemented fixation accounting for approximately 95% of all primary TKRs. In Australia, 68.1% of all primary TKRs use cemented fixation, and only 10.9% use cementless fixation. However, there has been a renewed interest in cementless fixation as a result of improvements in implant design and manufacturing technology.

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of cemented and cementless fixation in primary TKR. Outcome measures included the revision rate and patient-reported functional scores.

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from the earliest available date to November 2018 for randomized controlled trials of primary TKAs comparing cemented versus cementless fixation outcomes.

Six studies met our inclusion criteria and were analysed. A total of 755 knees were included; 356 knees underwent cemented fixation, 399 underwent cementless fixation. They were followed up for an average of 8.4 years (range: 2.0 to 16.6).

This study found no significant difference in revision rates and knee function in cemented versus cementless TKR at up to 16.6-year follow-up.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:793-798. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200030

A matched cohort study between cementless TKA and cemented TKA shows a reduction in tourniquet time and manipulation rate

Introduction

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is now becoming more acceptable with the advent of newer ongrowth constructs and better initial fixation. It has been proposed that cementless TKA may save OR time and result in a lower incidence of manipulation. This study was designed to assess the difference between cemented and cementless TKA.

Methods

Our hospital statistician performed a matched cohort analysis between 127 cementless TKAs and 127 cemented TKRs performed by a single surgeon. Patients were matched on age and BMI. Mean tourniquet time between the cemented and cementless TKAs was assessed as well as the rate of manipulation between these groups. Of note, a tourniquet was routinely used in both the cementless and cemented cohorts to reduce confounding bias.

Results

A total of 127 cementless TKAs with a mean age of 60.8 years and mean BMI 32.2 were compared to 127 cemented TKAs with a mean age of 61.5 years and mean BMI of 32.2 at an average follow-up of 2.0 years. There was a statistically significant reduction in tourniquet time in the cementless TKA cohort at 45.7 min compared to the cemented TKA cohort at 54.8 min (p = 0.001). Estimated blood loss was similar in both the cementless (179.5 ml) and cemented (196 ml) cohorts (p = 0.3) and postoperative outcomes, including UCLA score.In addition, the cementless TKA cohort had a manipulation rate of 0% compared to 3.1% for the cemented TKA group (p = 0.044).

Discussion and conclusion

While cementless and cemented TKA have shown similar PROMs and survivorship, we demonstrated a significant reduction in tourniquet time with cementless TKRs, with similar estimated blood loss, and a lower incidence of manipulation with cementless TKRs in this matched cohort study. The increased cost of a cementless implant may be negated if one considers the cost savings of not using cement, the cost savings of not performing manipulations, and the shorter operative time.

Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Contemporary Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with cementless fixation have been studied in multiple series with varying success. The aim of this study was to prepare a systematic review of the literature to evaluate clinical outcomes and revtpdelision rates of patients undergoing contemporary cementless TKA.

METHODS

A search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for English-language articles published between 2005 and 2018 to identify studies examining survivorship and clinical outcomes of cementless TKAs. Studies that reported clinical and/or radiographic outcomes were included. Data collected included the number of TKAs, implant utilized, primary diagnosis, mean age and follow-up, implant survivorship, complications, revisions, and clinical outcome scores. All hybrid constructs and revision TKAs were excluded. Poisson regression analysis was used to determine the revision incidence rates per 1,000 person-years.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies with 10,447 TKAs met inclusion criteria, of which 8,187 were primary cementless TKAs. The mean follow-up was 7 years. The revision incidence per 1,000 person-years was 4.8 for all cementless designs. The complication rate for all cementless TKAs was 6%, with deep venous thrombosis being the most common complication. The mean postoperative Knee Society Score and Functional Score were 92 and 83, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

While newer-generation cementless designs have shown improved survivorship and clinical outcomes compared with earlier-generation cementless designs, the literature for cementless designs remains limited when compared with cemented designs. Further studies are needed to determine if cementless TKA can achieve the same benefits that have been realized with cementless total hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses

INTRODUCTION

Knee osteoarthritis is the main indication for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is now accepted that cementless implantation of the femoral component provides equivalent results to cemented one, however, the optimal fixation method of the tibial component remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship of cemented versus cementless tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective, monocentric study, including 109 TKA (Zimmer^® Natural Knee II ultra-congruent mobile-bearing) implanted between 2004 and 2010 for primary osteoarthritis, comparing 2 groups depending on tibial component fixation method, one cemented (n = 68) and one cementless (n = 41). Clinical (Knee Society Rating System (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores, range of motion) and radiodiological outcomes were assessed at last follow-up with a minimal follow-up of 5 years.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up were 8.14 [5.31-12.7] and 8.06 [5.22-12.02] years, respectively, in cemented and cementless groups. The tibial component survival rate was 100% [95CI: 91.4-100] in the cementless group and 97.1% [95CI: 89.78-99.42] in the cemented group (2 aseptic loosenings) (p = 0.27). Radiolucent lines were present in 31.7% (n = 13) of the cementless and 44.1% (n = 30) of the cemented baseplates (p = 0.2). The postoperative KSS knee score was higher in the cementless group (99 ± 3 vs. 97 ± 7.5; p = 0.02), but there was no significant difference in KSS function, global KSS and HSS scores. Mean range of flexion was 120 ± 10° in the cementless group and 122.5 ± 15° in the cemented group (p = 0.37). No significant differences were found on the radiographic data or on complications.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the survival rate of the tibial component is not influenced by its fixation method at a mean follow-up of 8 years in osteoarthritis, which confirms the reliability of cementless fixation in primary TKA.

Cementless Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Various Patient Populations: A Literature Review

The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed in the United States has increased considerably in recent years, with a major contribution from younger patients. Maximizing survivorship of these implants has always been a point of emphasis. Early TKA designs with cementless fixation were associated with high rates of complications and implant failures. However, recent advances in cementless designs have shown excellent results. The decision to use cemented or cementless fixation for patients undergoing TKA is typically based on the surgeon's experience and preference. However, several patient characteristics must also be taken into account. The purpose of this review was to describe the clinical outcomes of studies in which a cementless TKA system was utilized for patients who (1) were less than 60 years of age, (2) were greater than 75 years of age, (3) were obese, (4) had rheumatoid arthritis, and (5) had osteonecrosis of the knee. Based on the studies included in this review, it appears that cementless fixation is a viable option for patients who have all of the above demographics.

Outcomes of Cementless-Backed Patellar Components

Because of the early follow-up positive outcomes with cementless fixation, continued evaluations need to be performed to ensure longer-term efficacy. Additionally, although many studies report on the results of femoral and tibial component fixation, few studies report specifically on patellar outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to report on the: (1) implant survivorship; (2) complications; and (3) radiographic outcomes in a large cohort of patients who received cementless total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), with particular attention to the patellar component. A total of 261 patients who underwent cementless TKA by a single, high-volume academic surgeon were studied. Patients had a mean age of 66 years and were distributed between 192 women (74%) and 69 men. All patients received the same cementless tibial, femoral, and patellar components. Mean follow-up period was 4.5 years (range, 4-5 years). Primary outcomes evaluated included all postoperative complications, with particular emphasis on the patellar component. Only one patellar loosened leading to a patellar aseptic loosening rate of 0.3% (1 of 261). The one patellar loosening was the component being dislodged after a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) at 6 weeks. This was revised to a cemented component and the patient is doing well 4 years later. A second patient experienced a patellar tendon rupture, later surgically repaired. Another patient sustained a patella fracture that was managed nonoperatively. The fracture healed by 1 year and the patient continued to have an otherwise successful outcome, now at 2 years follow-up. No progressive radiolucencies, subsidence, or changes in initial postoperative axial alignment were observed at final follow-up. The results from this study highlight a 98% success rate at mean 4.5 years follow-up in a large cohort of patients with a diverse spread of demographic details. Specific to the patella, only one patient experienced an adverse event, which was managed nonoperatively. Therefore, based on this data, patellar fixation in cementless TKA can be considered a safe technique.

Cemented vs Uncemented Femoral Components: A Randomized, Controlled Trial at 10 Years Minimum Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

The type of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) fixation (cemented or uncemented) is still subject to debate. The aim of this study is to assess the survival rate, clinical outcomes, and radiological results of TKA according to the fixation type.

METHODS

A total of 130 patients were randomly assigned to either the cement group (cemented femoral and tibial implants) or the hybrid group (cemented tibial implant, uncemented femoral implant). The inclusion criteria were patients between 50 and 90 years old who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis between 2004 and 2005 without a history of open knee surgery. Revisions and complications were reported, as well as clinical scores and radiological signs of loosening.

RESULTS

One hundred eighteen patients had complete data at 10 years of minimum follow-up (59 in each group). The mean age was 72 years old. The mean follow-up was 13 years. The survival rate was 98% at 13 years in both groups (1 aseptic loosening at 2 years in the cement group, 1 septic loosening in the hybrid group). The complication rate in the cement group was 8.5% (n = 5) vs 12.1% (n = 7) in the hybrid group (P = .8). The clinical results were not significantly different. In the cement group, 25% of patients (n = 15) had radiolucent lines at 10 years. In the hybrid group, 33% of patients had bone transparencies, not evolving or symptomatic.

CONCLUSION

At a minimum follow-up of 10 years, there were no significant differences between cemented TKA and hybrid TKA for the survivorship, the complication rate, the clinical scores, or the radiological signs of loosening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Comparison of infection in cemented, cementless and hybrid primary total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of joint replacement surgeries. Surgeons often take extra measures to reduce the risk of PJI. Whilst many studies have compared between cemented, cementless and hybrid fixation (femoral cementless, tibial cemented), most focus on survivorship, clinical and function outcome scores as primary endpoints. This meta-analysis aims to study the association between fixation methods and risk of PJI in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data from studies assessing prevalence of PJI in each fixation type were extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

Twelve RCT comprising a total of 1573 knees were included. Six RCT compared between cemented (n = 486 knees) and cementless (n = 440 knees) fixation, while six RCT compared between hybrid (n = 324 knees) and cementless (n = 323 knees) fixation. Network meta-analysis did not reveal any fixation type that significantly increased the infection rate in TKA. Rate of all infection was lowest in cemented TKA as compared to cementless (odds ratio (OR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-2.28) and hybrid (OR 0.63, 95%CI 0.13-2.99) TKA. Rate of PJI requiring revision surgery was lowest in cementless TKA as compared to cemented (OR 0.89, 95%CI 0.30-2.41) and hybrid (OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.09-2.71) TKA. Rate of PJI not requiring revision surgery was lowest in cemented TKA as compared to hybrid (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.06-6.10) and cementless (OR 0.55, 95% 0.14-5.63).

CONCLUSION

Unlike total hip arthroplasties, fixation method is not a predisposing risk factor for infections in TKA. However, this meta-analysis may not have sufficient statistical power to show a significant difference between fixation types. It is recommended that prophylactic precautions against other known risk factors for infection should still be clinically practiced.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

High Midterm Survival Rate of Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty After High Tibial Osteotomy: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is technically more demanding than TKA in a native knee. Studies have reported increased intraoperative and postoperative complication of TKA with previous HTO. The aim of this study is to compare the survival and complication rates and functional outcomes of uncemented TKA with previous HTO to primary TKA at our institution over a decade.

METHODS

This case-control study included 41 uncemented TKA after HTO between 2002 and 2012. For each case, 2 control patients were matched based on age and gender without previous HTO. The 2 groups were comparable for body mass index, as well as preoperative functional scores.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 7.8 ± 2.4 (range, 5-13.6) years. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in functional outcomes or radiological imaging, particularly the rate of radiological loosening. There was no significant difference in complications (9; 22%) in the group of TKA after HTO vs the control group (14; 17%). One revision was performed in the group of TKA after HTO for septic loosening, and no revisions in the control group. The survival rate at a mean follow-up of 8 years was 97.6% in the group TKA after HTO vs 100% in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Uncemented TKAs following HTO have no significant difference in functional and radiological outcomes and survivorship compared to uncemented primary TKA at midterm follow-up.